This is what he means The Spurs dynasty (5) has more titles then the Warriors (4) dynasty. But in total the Warriors have 7 titles and Spurs only have 5
The Celtics have more championships the reason when the NBA started the Lakers we’re playing in Minneapolis won 5 there when moved to LA they got 12. The Celtics have stayed in Boston since 1946 won 17 championships there let’s make the 18 vs the Mavs
Celtics should have more. I know people shot on the 60s titles for the Celtics but nobody talks about how the lakers first ring was in 1949 and was the BAA not the NBA. The lakers literally have 16 NBA titles but they count the BAA one as 17 which is like the browns saying they have 4 Super Bowl wins. EVERY Celtics fan knows who Red Auerbach is, have any lakers fans ever heard the name John Kundla? Do they know he won them 5 “NBA” championships before 1955 as head coach?
Nah if anything the lakers would have more bozo. The lakers won more titles with more teams in the league then the shitty ass celtics, so therefore the lakers are obviously the clearly better and more successful overall franchise. The lakers also have way more and better fans then the celtikkks and of course LA is a much nicer and better city then shitty Boston . Get tf outta here with that bs 🤡🤡🤡
Also, the exact knowledge of the individual fan is irrelevant because contemporarily, you guys were harrassing Bill Russell while he was winning, so fan support and knowledge affects championships? Get the fuck out of here, by that logic, the Celtics only have 6 championships.
The Celtics and Lakers maybe tied, but the city of Boston has more. The Lakers won five of those championships while they were in Minneapolis and Boston won all 17 in the same city and as the same franchise. So in reality Los Angeles has 12 and Boston has 17.
Nice job you damn Bostonian, you won your fake championships when there was 8 teams in the league and teams had like 3-5 black players! You have won 1 championship in almost 40 years. You are a poverty franchise no different than the Knicks since there was a 3 point line! By the way, you guys traded franchises to the Clippers in 1979, which technically you have only 4 rings.
@@BabylonGateLA Which City has a better quality of living? Which City has a bigger crime rate? Which City has the richer folk ruining the lives of the average person? Which City is a smuggy, piece of shit with a degenerate superficial society? I can assure you only the first one applies to Boston.
I wouldn't do that. So you're going to the Sixers those championships? Do we also subtract the 3 they won in Oakland and only count the championships from 1975 and 2022? Do the Sixers only win 2 because their first was won in Syracuse.?
Half of the Lakers championships they were the Minneapolis Lakers. The Los Angeles Lakers are not even close to Boston. If LA fans want to celebrate Minneapolis's championships... It comes across as desperate.
I hate when people say that yes it's a fact the Lakers played in Minneapolis but it's still the Lakers, it's not like they changed both the city and the name like the Thunder and Supersonics teams that are still connected. Boston won most of their championships in the prehistoric era when the NBA was not as strong less teams most of the Lakers titles we're in the modern era started from Magic to today.
It’s the same franchise but their first title shouldn’t count. They won their first title in 1949 in the BAA and the count that as an NBA championship 😂. They also won 5 of their 17 before 1955. Yet it’s the Celtics who people say won all their rings in the plumbers era, in that case then the lakers won their rings in the goddamn pickup basketball era.
@@the_o_man Would the Philly Warriors count for Golden State or Sonics count for the Thunder? Is ownership the determining factor? If so, would the Clippers have started over with their new owner? Kansas City Royals became Sacramento Kings so that would count? Vancouver Grizzlies to Memphis too? The rings should count wherever you won them. The fans of that city funded the team that won the rings.
Another hating Celtic's fan. Let me real Lakers are the better franchise and has been for over 30 years. The Celtics can never top what the Lakers have done in modern times
@@phucyew9394 that franchise won 17, and the owner of the Celtics wanted to put the Celtics in the West so the Clippers and Celtics owners and boards swaped.
Last one just confused the hell outta me with the graphics and audio
YeS iT iS tHe SpUrS
It’s the warriors, they have 6
@@jodanengbers 7
This is what he means
The Spurs dynasty (5) has more titles then the Warriors (4) dynasty.
But in total the Warriors have 7 titles and Spurs only have 5
@@jodanengberswas this a “aww I see what ya did there good one”
Or a
“6>7 dummy obviously/apparently🤷🏾♂️ . What we talking about?”
The last question 😭😭
he's right now with the celtics
You beat me to it brah 😎 damn 😂
The 3rd question confused me…
That’s how you know they don’t watch basketball
How
@@hezyxHe went 1/3 on easy questions
I don't even really watch basketball but even, I, got 3/3. That says a lot for them.
said it’s the spurs but it was the warriors
Tim D got all the Spurs Championships 😭🐐
“Chanpionships”
Meaning NBA Championships
The Celtics have more championships the reason when the NBA started the Lakers we’re playing in Minneapolis won 5 there when moved to LA they got 12. The Celtics have stayed in Boston since 1946 won 17 championships there let’s make the 18 vs the Mavs
I don’t know basketball that well and I still got all of them
Google
Lakers Celtics 17th Champion.
Warriors 7th Champion 🏆
Lakers 16. Bubbles dont count
Actually it’s Golden State’s 5th championship because two of those championships were won by the Philadelphia Warriors.
@@jacksonconley5117 same team just moved courts lol.
Celtics should have more. I know people shot on the 60s titles for the Celtics but nobody talks about how the lakers first ring was in 1949 and was the BAA not the NBA. The lakers literally have 16 NBA titles but they count the BAA one as 17 which is like the browns saying they have 4 Super Bowl wins. EVERY Celtics fan knows who Red Auerbach is, have any lakers fans ever heard the name John Kundla? Do they know he won them 5 “NBA” championships before 1955 as head coach?
Nah if anything the lakers would have more bozo. The lakers won more titles with more teams in the league then the shitty ass celtics, so therefore the lakers are obviously the clearly better and more successful overall franchise. The lakers also have way more and better fans then the celtikkks and of course LA is a much nicer and better city then shitty Boston . Get tf outta here with that bs 🤡🤡🤡
People remember Red Auerbach because he was involved until his death and was the last coach to have any serious mark on the franchise.
Also, the exact knowledge of the individual fan is irrelevant because contemporarily, you guys were harrassing Bill Russell while he was winning, so fan support and knowledge affects championships? Get the fuck out of here, by that logic, the Celtics only have 6 championships.
Bubbles dont count so it would be 15
@@Supylocothat would be incorrect
Man’s looking like tony robbins 😅
Correction, The Los Angeles Lakers have 12 NBA Championships.
No they dont
@@HurricaneProd14 didn’t get the joke
@@triple-touchdown-master2770 ya ur right
@@triple-touchdown-master2770 what joke
@@Musydid911 Minneapolis lakers have 5 championships and LA Lakers have 12
👍
The Celtics and Lakers maybe tied, but the city of Boston has more. The Lakers won five of those championships while they were in Minneapolis and Boston won all 17 in the same city and as the same franchise. So in reality Los Angeles has 12 and Boston has 17.
but the celtics only have 4 post ABA merger
Nice job you damn Bostonian, you won your fake championships when there was 8 teams in the league and teams had like 3-5 black players! You have won 1 championship in almost 40 years. You are a poverty franchise no different than the Knicks since there was a 3 point line! By the way, you guys traded franchises to the Clippers in 1979, which technically you have only 4 rings.
@@SISKCERTWaJaVlogsThat’s a poverty franchise in the modern era 😂😂 4 championships since they have a 3 point line!
oh yea lakers have 18.5 chips to bostons 17.
(one in the nbl and .5 in the ist)
@@BabylonGateLA 4 post aba nba merger to lakers 12
Lakers have 12. The other 5 were won in Minnesota. Dont @ me!.🙄🙄
Different city same franchise
Now hes right but there playoff run was easy
Nice
I’m so confused on the last question
Yes its the Spurs
GSW has the third most Championship titles.
@@Musydid911 bro hes probably joking stfu 😭
Celtics will one before Lakers do
It’s not really a tie in championship titles and loses
Boston Celtics 17-5
Los Angeles / mpls Lakers 17-15
Lakers have 16. Bubbles dont count
Lakers clearly better than, same titke but way more conference final tropies.
@@thialhoinj1971 it’s scripted bro
More nba finals>less nba finals
We're is Chicago
The Warriors got more
Bro how do you not know the first one?
17>12
@@phucyew9394Lol different city same franchise
Lakers over Celtics
👇
Celtics over Lakers
👇
@@Musydid911Who’s more r@cist, Boston or LA?
@@BabylonGateLA Who has more homeless people? Boston or LA?
@@Musydid911 Who has richer people? Which city has more capital?
@@BabylonGateLA Which City has a better quality of living? Which City has a bigger crime rate? Which City has the richer folk ruining the lives of the average person? Which City is a smuggy, piece of shit with a degenerate superficial society? I can assure you only the first one applies to Boston.
If we count out the championship because those were built from Philly in Spurs have more title
I wouldn't do that. So you're going to the Sixers those championships? Do we also subtract the 3 they won in Oakland and only count the championships from 1975 and 2022? Do the Sixers only win 2 because their first was won in Syracuse.?
Bulls
Why do te Lakers count Minneapolis titles but haven’t retired those players numbers?
It’s both of them they have 17 championships
Lakers got 16. Bubbles dont count
@@nonamewillbegiven7228 That was a Mickey Mouse Ring
Joey Salads making Sports videos now?
Tied 😂😂
The last question like what?
Nah me and the warriors have more
said warriors i guesssed wilt had a chip somewhere
They won one with rick barry, and at least one with Paul Arizin from my understanding
Depends who the refs ate
69th like!
Half of the Lakers championships they were the Minneapolis Lakers. The Los Angeles Lakers are not even close to Boston. If LA fans want to celebrate Minneapolis's championships... It comes across as desperate.
I hate when people say that yes it's a fact the Lakers played in Minneapolis but it's still the Lakers, it's not like they changed both the city and the name like the Thunder and Supersonics teams that are still connected. Boston won most of their championships in the prehistoric era when the NBA was not as strong less teams most of the Lakers titles we're in the modern era started from Magic to today.
If you wanna play that card then Clippers have Boston’s last 6 and Boston has 11
Same franchise. Location doesn't matter
@@bacoeall of the Celtics' titles was won in Boston
@@the_o_manYes finally someone who knows
Lakers have 18 championships (1 in NBL, 1 in BAA, 16 in NBA)
On IST
5 of the Lakers championships were in Minneapolis and shouldn't really be counted towards the total.
Same franchise. Location doesn't matter
It’s the same franchise but their first title shouldn’t count. They won their first title in 1949 in the BAA and the count that as an NBA championship 😂. They also won 5 of their 17 before 1955. Yet it’s the Celtics who people say won all their rings in the plumbers era, in that case then the lakers won their rings in the goddamn pickup basketball era.
@@the_o_man Would the Philly Warriors count for Golden State or Sonics count for the Thunder? Is ownership the determining factor? If so, would the Clippers have started over with their new owner? Kansas City Royals became Sacramento Kings so that would count? Vancouver Grizzlies to Memphis too? The rings should count wherever you won them. The fans of that city funded the team that won the rings.
Completely agree
Another hating Celtic's fan. Let me real Lakers are the better franchise and has been for over 30 years. The Celtics can never top what the Lakers have done in modern times
Mistake!!!
Early
Celtics have the most. Lakers didnt win all of theirs in LA
But their team did.
You sound like the people who say "nO cElTiCs dOnT hAvE 17! 12 wErE wOn bY tHe CLiPpErS oWnEr!"
@@Musydid911 what you on about? 😂
@@phucyew9394 that franchise won 17, and the owner of the Celtics wanted to put the Celtics in the West so the Clippers and Celtics owners and boards swaped.
@@phucyew9394 I think the players also swapped but I'm not sure
Bubbles dont count
Plumbers era rings don't count