Johnny Depp And Amber Heard - What Happens To Their Careers Now
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 06. 2022
- Please support the sponsors of today's show
MEUNDIES - Get 15% off your first order at www.meundies.com/campea
Watch the full episode this clip is from here:
• Massive DC And Warner ...
Viewer Question:
BALLZ 2 DA WALLZ -.Hey John and team. So what happens now? Johnny Depp lost his first court case pretty badly. He won the second
one, but Heard won part of her countercase too. I know you only like talking about this stuff when it affects the movies we see, so how is this
going to impact the movies we will or won’t see Depp or Heard starring in moving forward?
Watch John's new documentary, "Movie Trailers: A Love Story" available now worldwide at www.vimeo.com/ondemand/movietr... and also available in the US and UK on Amazon Video.
Leave a question when you tip at streamelements.com/movieblogt... and it will be answered on the Mail Bag show. (Remember, you are submitting a TIP to support the channel. You are not "buying" a question to be on the show. We're happy to answer the questions or comments you submit with your tips, but we reserve the right to not air any question or comment if we consider it inappropriate, unconstructive or disruptive to the flow of the show).
JOHN’S GEAR LINKS
Main Cameras
Sony A6400 - amzn.to/2VsMMyx
Sony A6600 - amzn.to/3bbfivl
Canon XC15 - amzn.to/3abgZY8
Mic pre-amps
Cloudlifter - amzn.to/3ckgvRa
Good Cheaper Cameras John Uses
Canon Vixia R800 - amzn.to/2yfa8zI
Logitech c920 Webcam - amzn.to/3eiul8m
Main Microphones
Rode Procaster - amzn.to/3cum1AT
Good Cheaper Mics John Uses Sometimes
Audio-Technica ATR2100x (usb and xlr) - amzn.to/34FSIID
Blue Yeti (usb) - amzn.to/2XyVZb8
Lapel Mic
FiFine (usb) - amzn.to/2VvzocW
Shotgun Mics
Rode VideoMic GO (small on camera mic) - amzn.to/34A3YX0
Rode NTG2 (main Studio mic) - amzn.to/2REkH6d
Sennheiser MKE 600 (main Studio mic) - amzn.to/3eo5boY
Soundboard/Mixer
RODEcaster Pro (main) (usb) - amzn.to/2RzozFC
Behringer Xenyx 1204USB (backup board) - amzn.to/2yf8VZn
Streaming Software
Wirecast Pro
Wirecast Control Surface - amzn.to/34DzjrG
Lights
Nanlite Lumipad 25 (main studio lights) - amzn.to/2XAeVXd
Neewer Ring Light (secondary lights) - amzn.to/2RDRoAP
FalconEyes F7 Pocketlite (background color lights) - amzn.to/3emBgNT
Selfie Ring - (guest light) - amzn.to/3a6esOZ
Show Notes Computer
iPad Pro 2020 - amzn.to/34ALhCA
Submit your topic or question for The John Campea Show here:
www.thejohncampeashow.com/contact
Follow John on Instagram:
/ johncampea - Zábava
John, you didn't watch her "performance" on the stand if you think Heard is a good actor! Even her own acting coach admitted that she can't cry on command.
LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE, she lied on the stand, photoshopped pics, accidentally received all of johnies text messages and found nothing !
U are right these are idiots just making mess in air😂😂😂
Alerted TMZ of her court appearance with an alleged bruise on her face.
The UK court wasn’t neutral in its ruling either. It was clearly biased
Exactly!
@@LarryJ602 UK wasn't about AH. It was about The Sun. And we're talking about two different districts /countries. So legally the UK doesn't mean anything to this trial. And the UK Court found that she lied but for some reason still found her credible.
JD is not the winner bc of the amount of money. He is the winner bc he won all 3 of his counts. Which means the jury said her statements of being a DV victim were false and were made with malice. She also brought 3 counts of defamation against 3 statements that JD’s attorney made. She won the one that said she and her friends set up JD and trashed her penthouse and framed Jd for it. She lost the other 2 that said her DV claim was a hoax. Thus one can infer that the jury thought she lied about her DV
John is low key misrepresenting what the UK court said. It was a civil case, no judgement was rendered on whether or not he was guilty of actually beating Heard. What they ruled was that there was reasonable doubt over whether or not Heard’s statements were true and therefore they didn’t qualify as defamation.
Thank you! I see too many people get hung up on the whole "wife beater" thing without actually looking into what the case was about.
It's because he knows nothing of it that he hasn't read on Variety. Most people don't speak on subjects they know nothing about, but not Campea
@@OCMRick I don’t think this is true. People talk about things they know little about all the time. See the Dunning-Kruger effect. This is especially true regarding news stories, where many people have more confidence in the accuracy of something they read or hear when they know little about the subject, while people with more knowledge are more skeptical.
In other words, he isn’t a lawyer or law enthusiast, so he has no reason not to trust whatever summary of the UK trial he happened to have heard. It is practically expected that he would speak with a higher degree of confidence than someone who knows more about it, and understands the potential ambiguity.
At least that is what I heard somewhere. I’m not a psychologist, but I read an article about this once, so I am pretty sure I know what I am talking about 😉
@@baertheblader9402 For clarity then...Most people who have a platform* I'm quite sure he doesn't care to look into it, as I said he's just parroting whatever Variety/Deadline post
The judge unfortunately had a son that works for the sun. I don't understand why they aren't making an appeal over it? Or more light gets shed on this either?
"Mutualy abusive relationship" MY ASS. Seriously what do you loose by acknowledging male victims of domestic violence? Do you loose your feminist cred? Is feminist cred really that worth?
I guess we can say the same for Winstein :D
Obviously hasn't watched the trial. They found she acted with actual malice in accusing him of increasingly outrageous crimes with no evidence. The UK judge believed her when she said on oath she donated the divorce settlement. I believe she suffers from the disorders outlined. That doesn't negate the lies she told to get the money. That's why she didn't succeed on the countersuit which mentioned ' hoax'. Why should JD suffer anymore than he already has.
Exactly.
John wants to cite legal bonafides then the start of that is reading the basis for her credibility.
It's ridiculous basis, donation she never fulfilled (to a Children's Hospital!) And that the 6 US cops willing to testify against Heard are less credible than her
Anyone else get bothered by John's misinterpretation of the UK trial lawd have mercy
he keeps repeating that Johnny is a Wife beater, it´s so annoying
@@jonathangimenos9777 he probably read that Johnny pledged a beating to Amber and confused it with actually giving one
No spine to admit he was wrong 😑. Pride is a hell of a drug…
I remember when John Campea said Johnny should let it go.
Because he’s a wife beater
John, I have always respected your opinion on most topics, but, I actually WATCHED the trial and saw the FACTS. You say you don't follow it because it disgusts you, that's totally fine. Then DON'T speak about it! You believe a SINGLE judge in one case and accept that as fact but you doubt a JURY? Not to mention that the cases are not synonymous. Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, then to open it and remove all doubt. Sorry John but much respect lost!
Word
John a lot of the evidence brought forth in the US case was not allowed in the UK case bc AH was not a party and only a witness. The UK judge has ties with a close friend of AH and with the Sun newspaper. You can’t compare that case to this one bc SH was the defendant in this case
It is funny that an alleged abuser lost his carrier with just a word from a malicious person, and an actual abuser can still revive after this.
This is some of the most out of touch analysis of the trial that I have heard. He won every claim he had against Heard. It wasn't close. Amber's claim was against his lawyer making a defamatory statement, not about DV.
There are a lot worse out there, believe me. For the most outrageous, I would recommend an article from the Guardian. I think looking at it as a scorecard approximates the takeaway of someone who hasn't paid attention to the trial at all and just sees headlines about the verdict.
But you are right: Johnny's defamation win was a slam dunk. Literally a verdict that the sexual abuse claims were a lie. There's a lot of curiosity about what the AH win on claim two was based on, though, since they ruled calling her allegations a hoax *wasn't* defamation. Give that some spin and it takes some of the shine off Johnny's win if you haven't been paying attention.
WTF? They didn't talk AT ALL about the trial... only about their future careers.
john literally knows nothing about the uk court case or the us court case, he must’ve only read some articles and not watched the actual thing on tv or youtube
He cites the 120 page judgement but doesn't see the context of the UK system, the now proven lies that Justice Nichol recklessly assumed were proof of Amber's credibility and the judges rejection of US police testimony to mention only a couple of the myriad issues and not get into the judges wealth of personal connections to The Sun and his wife's connection to Amber Heard
Hamada himself testified that she lied that’s an automatic black list in wb she lied and and called every one that testified against her a liar there’s a chance that she might face charges for lying in court that’s gonna give her a hard time getting job offers from studios plus the public opinion is not in her favor what studio will take a chance hiring someone that’s hated by the public.
Actually there are courts on 3 separate continents that might have grounds and intent to charge her with perjury. So ... she has a mountain of court time pending, depending on whether these three countries really decide to go after her.
Ok...Amber Heard is not a good actress, that's my only gripe with this clip. Even her acting coach said she's a terrible actress. Plus what male talent will want to be alone with her when we all know she is capable of telling monstrous lies. She's a walking liability.
Walter Hamada used industry code that everyone on this show understands very well but Erin & Kris would know back to front. Amber has no "chemistry" not that the two lead actors lack it, just Amber, she is the one person in the film series they wanted to replace and still might for reasons completely seperate to public relations, Hamada was awkwardly forced to admit the first film only worked because they worked the magic of "editing" over her takes and then tried to dissuade her from returning by giving her low pay for the sequel and short notice before filming.
The crew here are not convincing me of their bona fides by missing the trees for the forest there but luckily I've loved the show for years and know they know these things, so I assume, like with the Will Smith slap where the initial social media of the panellists changed markedly from what was said on the show, politics are coming into this when this case specifically was about credibility but people are assigning assumed credibility based on gender not evidence
You clearly didn’t watch the trial and keep mentioning “wife beater” and “uk trial” when it’s well known she committed perjury and they didn’t allow his evidence in.
I love how the lady on the panel was actually honest about Amber Heard's acting abilities.
@@harold3165 because she essentially said “she’s pretty” and it’s not that far off. Have you seen the Snyder Cut. That accent she’s doing oooooof. She was always a bad actress.
Been watching you for years now John since the Collider days with Harloff, Ellis etc but I'm sorry man but unless you actually know whats going on and are informed about the trial in the US and UK you shouldn't be talking about this topic.
Also Johnny was never proven to be a wife beater in the UK
John lost me wen he said Amber heard was a good actriz...he lost all the credibility at that point lmao...n it seems like John is upset Amber lost 🤔
Exactly, John knows industry code, simply watch Walter Hamadas testimony, he says in so many words that they instantly regretted hiring her , wanted to recast, tried to dissuade her return by not giving her the price hike she wanted , still want her out and that it has NOTHING to do with any negative PR.
For bonus points her own acting coach said at trial she can't emote convincingly e.g. cry
"She is a good actress." If you guys hadn't already told us you weren't watching the trial that closely, we would know by this statement that you haven't been watching that closely. Her "crying" monologues on the stand were painful and insulting. (Later: Thanks to Kris Carr for restoring the balance.)
He still keeps holding on to that UK case as being legitimate despite everything in the Virginia case showing what a load of crock it was.
Dude you obviously didn't watch the trial at all. She clearly lied. Altered photos, saying she didn't leak the video to tmz. Not to mention her own words in several audio recordings. The UK court did not rule he was a wife beater. It ruled the newspaper being sued did not defame him by publishing it's story. Plus amber heard wasn't the defendent in that case so to compare them is wrong. Do your research man.
Exactly!!!
It's Obvious nobody on this panel even watched ANY of the trial!! She LIED about everything.
The jury unanimously found her testimony UN-Creditable...
meaning they didn't believe a word she said. She faked what little evidence she had!!
Johnny has been vindicated 100%. And he has powerful true, friends on his side, that will help reignite his career.
Robert Downey Jr. & Tim Burton to name a few.
There was no cross examination of Amber Heard in the UK trial. She was allowed to say anything she wanted without scrutiny. All the Sun had to do is prove she was the source of the story not that the story was factual. It was also decided by one judge not a jury. Hardly the standard set by US defamation law.
@@Midnight_Rider_777
EXACTLY!!!! 100% !!!
People ...
it's not that hard to
find out what the facts are:
UK trial vs US trial
She's an abuser, if this was a dude it wouldn't be a question
Amen!!!!!!!!!
The idea that Johnny Depp's career was already on the rocks since 2017 seems a stretch considering he was in Crimes of Grindelwald in 2018 and was due to return in that role until he got hit with the MeToo hoax.
MeToo was actually a really good idea and movement at first, and should have always been for not just women, unfortunately it got hijacked by those who just want to use it as a shield to protect their own interests and lies. The "believe all women/accusers" bs that came from that movement was the real crime.
The UK judge was corrupt. People idolise Johnny not disney or Warner brothers. Johnny now is bigger than Warner or disney...
Jesus John, stop listening to the sound of your own voice and do some research cause she clearly lied and it was proven in the court. You are a clear symbol of the defamation and if you aren't informed on the matter and yet continue to use the slurs put on johnny as if they are fact even after the evidence proving to the contrary. That's just ignorant and wrong on your part mate. Couldn't have given a shit before the trial happened but after seeing all that evidence, she is a terrible person and a liar and deserves what she gets.
He's proving Johnny Depps point on the stand, Johnny said that no matter what the outcome of the trial there will always be people who believe in the lies that has been spread for the past 6 years- There are a lot of people like Campea out there
I could care less if Heard’s career is over, she did it to herself. Deal with it!
Johnny is back heard is done. No one will watch a film with her in it. Play the middle man if you want. Social and judicial had spoken!!
yup
NO he is not johnny was done before this
@@johansvensson833 cry more
The only reason Johnny lost in the UK is because Amber's lies were believed.
Just for context: I went into this trial not on anyone’s side; I just wanted to watch a legal trial live.
The allegations in the UK court were ‘true’ based on the evidence allowed in the court. JD wasn’t allowed the evidence that he brought into the US and he was suing for a different reason. She clearly made this up to get money, he’s innocent based on the evidence, which just highlights how shit the UK trial really was. Put it this way, do you believe 7 people who found him innocent or 1 biased person who found him guilty? And that’s before you even get into the fact that the whole world who actually WATCHED the trial believe him. Studios would be silly not to hire him now.
The legal analysts were shocked by the outcome of the uk trial as well. Then we found out the judge had ties to the sun. Then it all made sense.
@@redhood420 yep you nailed it. And the judge was only ruling based on the evidence she provided the newspaper with (which turned out to be manipulated via photo editing software) and he came to that conclusion based on his drug use which is ridiculous.
Amber never was even close to a B-list actress and everything she got was based on she being pretty hot. She's toast. As for Johnny, I'd pay to watch whatever he's in as I've done for the last 2 decades.
@@carladams9345 and without acting chops to get serious roles she's a goner
I do not why he is comparing the UK court with the US court, they have extremely different justice systems and it’s really not as black and white innocent and guilty in the UK
John is completely wrong with what he said happened in the UK case, he needs to read up on what actually happened in that case.
What actually happened there?
That's the problem though with the UK trial in which he is right in the way he is wrong. People are very often confused with the misconception of the UK trial.
There was also some connection to the newspaper The Sun with the Judge involved and he was a very shady Judge. That’s who Johnny was sewing in the UK, the newspaper not Amber herself.
The case in UK was also not a win for Amber she was not a defendant in the case... Get ya'll facts straight guys come on😤 it was Johnny Vs The Sun. The Judge was found to have ties with The Sun as well😮💨
I'm supprised people using the UK Court case as a basis for Amber?
If anything that court case should be called into question. What a joke to justice.
Amber commmited purjury and not the first time!
Lol, stick around, Campea does opinion not facts and even then it's probably a regurgitated Variety/THR piece
The UK court case was a joke... Can't even be in the question lol
okay.. did I just hear someone call Heard's abuse and dv against Johnny (chopped off finger) referred to as 'shenanigans'... I am going to assume I miss-heard. 1. The UK trial is a non-factor. It was wether a newspaper at the time had the right to print that based of the info they got. The trial heavily or rather solely relied on Amber being a believable witness... so the judge, not a jury, decided yes the Sun had been entitled to print that. Only it now has been revealed that while the Sun may or may not have had the right to print based of Amber's lies... everything she said was indeed a LIE 2. Amber is a middling actress. I liked her in drive angry, but literally forgot half her performances. And Yes, Meera could have been anyone else. 3. JD stated that he was not going back to Disney and his demeanour during Hamada's testimony suggests he is really hurt by WB actions/treatment (fire him , keep her). But I am sure he will be back as a lead faster than you can think. 4. Unless someone finds proof of juror impropriety, which I admit is a possibility given some social media activity, I do not see any grounds for an appeal.
It will age as well as Sharon Osbourne on The Talk with a panel of women laughing that a psychotic wife chopped of her husband's penis after he filed for divorce and made him watch while she chopped it up in the garbage disposal.
John is positioning himself like it's forward thinking to acknowledge the long history of women being abused as we have been striving to do for the better part of 50 years now but to then laugh off the psychological and physical destruction of a man.
It's very off putting to say the least. As a guy who had legal run ins and narrowly escaped a woman like this with help from friends I saw John as a carefully thought out guy who was relatable and this makes me think if knew him IRL he'd give me a subtle shove under the bus if it's where he found me struggling.
Abuse has no gender.
Hey John And Everyone else that will Read This Comment I just want to add as someone from the UK There has Been A lot of Controversy Concerning The UK trail since the USA Trail Got Under Way It Has come out that the judge in the UK trail is best mates with Murdoch and the judge’s Son who works with his dad knows the reporter that made the Headline and report and they also are both Friends of Amber so as you can see many conflicts of interest took part in the UK trail that lead to Johnny losing over here but like I said it’s all being looked into now and there is a possibility that the ruling that was made will be basically Voided
Yeah, it was absolute madness.
*trial
I have watched nearly all of the trial. I don't see a world where she wins her appeal. All that will happen is, that she even loses the case she had won.
Also: I highly disagree. She is not a great actress. She is pretty terrible and forgettable.
I think, quite the opposite, provided that it doesn't take place in Virginia but California, and it doesn't get Livestreamed so the jury aren't pressured to conform to the public's desire. His PR team will have a considerably more difficult turn without videos taken out of context and all comments will be like screaming into dead space. His money and misogyny won't factor into any of it, he won't control the narrative, and then I'll be willing to accept that as a real win. Imo, his actions were borderline sociopathic during the proceedings, they were the actions of a man who couldn't care less about what was happening in the court, because whatever does, he will end up reframing it and controlling it. If he'd smacked her while she was on the stand, the internet would have found a way to make it seem like it's her fault, and that he was just a kind hearted innocent man who's *definitely not on drugs* doing the right thing.
I still can't believe he bought his verdict, it's convoluted but he still did! I want this done differently, I want it done where there's no freaking way he or any of his zombie army could control the narrative
@@samf.s.7731 Obviously we saw a different trial.
@@samf.s.7731 amber's PR team hard at work I see
@samf.s.7731 Wow you swallowed all the lies that AH has spoken and didn't take into account the audios where she states that she hit him, causes physical fights, cut off the tip of his finger, calls him a baby because he hides from her physical abuse. You need to help women that have actually been ab used not AH who says she is ab used and yet pictures the next day show no injuries. Yet there are pictures with JD having black eyes, even EM was in puctures with black eye while dating AH. There are even pictures with AH bruised knuckles just there is no proof that JD hit her at all. You need to take off your believe all women glasses and look at the proof.
UK case wasn’t legit and also dirty, everyone who has followed and done research knows this There was also some connection to the newspaper The Sun with the Judge involved and he was a very shady Judge. That’s who Johnny was sewing in the UK, the newspaper not Amber herself. Also, Amber didn’t win anything on Johnny in this case, she won against something one of his old attorneys said to the media a while back. Johnny won on all 3 counts of his case, Amber won 1 of 3. That’s a 5 to 1 victory for Johnny, that’s total vindication for him and a total loss for her. Tired of this getting spinned in the medias like this was somehow split!!
It wasn’t just he won a court case, the way the UK judge behaved and the evidence of this case I think he is vindicated. I do think the articles criticizing the trial because it hurts victims, we had her say “who is going to believe you” and admitted to hitting him. Women do have leeway in getting physical with men we don’t. Debatable how much if any that leeway should be. The abuse is overshadowed by her slander.
I don’t like how they DID NOT address the EXTREME of Amber and her LIES. And how NO ONE backed up any of her stories and claims.
Her career is DONE however after all this SO MANY have reached out and supported Johny from FANS, Friends, Peers, Producers etc.
We will see MORE of Johnny for years to come. He is LOVED and RESPECT.
Amber. Is a TURD.
I don’t think John understands the UK case or this at all. Very different. He doesn’t even understand why Johnny won this case outright and what exactly amber ‘won’. And thank you Kris. Amber is a terrible ACTRESS. John and rob are nuts to say she’s good.
Super disappointed in John. It just shows that he did not watch the trial and just read the headlines of the media. He should do his due digilience and watch the trial or watch CZcams legal experts that talk about the case.
Honestly, I do not think John cares about the JD and Amber, which is fine. But I find it troubling that he acts like he looked it all up and then... comes out with this. I think, he believes the verdicts - regardless of the fine print - are all that will be deciding moving forward, but at least with JD, I think that the details of what actually happened will now save his career.
I encourage anyone that actually wants to know the details go look it up cause John knows very little about it, the UK case was only about if "the sun" was liable, that judge only viewed the few things amber brought to the table, Johnny wasn't allowed to provide any evidence to the contrary and in this US trial he was and it unanimously proved she was the agressor Johnny was the victim, she lied, manipulated evidence and so on..
100% !!!!!!
Heard is a good actress?
The tears she couldn't muster out during the trial would strongly disagree with you, John...
🤣
John is a fool for saying Amber is a good actress. Hahaha 😆😂🤡
Her acting in court made her lose this case
John you obviously didn’t watch the trial, he won the case and heard can’t appeal so stop spreading lies about him losing to her
Framing someone for domestic violence is equated to shenanigans 😭.
Amber's shenanigangs, I guess Ezra Miller did some Oopsies and Kevin Spacey is facing a trial in the UK based on a series of unfortunate events. Sad take. Really sad..
The 1 point Amber got is extremely out of context.....its 1 point she got for depps lawyer having said something defamatory about her.
She didnt get ANY points on any of the abuse cases....in other words she lied over and over and so is her career....over.
It wasn't even defamatory about her, because the jury already admitted that her abuse allegations against him are false. But Johnny's former lawyer in that sentence implied that she and her friends, after Johnny left the hourse, tried to frame him pouring wine on the floor, setting a scene, and calling the police, meaning that it was a sort of conspiracy by all of them. If you weren't there or don't have a bold evidence, you can't say that.
@@MsLucy4ever - Yes, it was my understanding that her one "win" was almost more damning to her credibility. The analysis I saw was that the jurors clearly thought Amber had tried to pull some kind of fraud and hoax of abuse. They simply didn't agree about the role her friends took, so they awarded her the $2 mil because that one statement implicating the friends couldn't be verified.
well the statement she won on wasn't even that defamatory. basically for those that didn't read it JD's lawyer said "she called the cops, the cops came saw nothing and left so Amber and her friends trashed the penthouse, called her lawyer and publicist to get their story straight and then called 911"
ok, by saying that statement was false all it really says is AT WORST JD trashed his own Penthouse...who gives a shit?
also the real reason she won was likely because it's really hard to prove that not only Amber, but all her friends and well as a lawyer colluded against JD to make said mess.
The UK trial outcome you pretty much have to take with a grain of salt... UK court system is very different and perhaps even worse than the US court system.... A lot of the evidence that won him his case here in the US was basically casted aside by the judge in the UK...
Right now Amber heard is a huge liability to movie studios. When you have 4M people take their time to sign remove Amber heard from aquaman2 petition despite Western mainstream media defending her you have a huge problem.
I'd like to see Johnny Depp in a Quentin Tarantino movie
John, please quit being ignorant and pushing the Johnny is a wife beater narrative, the UK judge literally only looked at the photo amber provided, that was btw proven enhanced and doctored in this trial, also that UK judge wasn't interested in proving if johnny was innocent, Johnny was suing a UK news paper that the judges realitive works for, plus he refused to look at Johnnys evidence, so stop with the "UK court proved he's a wife beater" cause they absolutely didn't, they didn't wanna hear it and just exonerated their home paper and moved on...
Much love respect and admiration for Johnny for putting up with all the bullsh"t and mayhem that the media put him through. He never gave up and justice has finally been served. 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾💯
I watched the trial, things that came out, the things about that her testimomy dont match her own evidence. Those thing destroyed her in publics eye forever. Specially walter hamada testifying wb wanna recast heard in 2018 because the chemistry wasn't right in the 1st movie.
@@darrel7589 oh yeah it destroyed her career pretty much. UK trial was against the sun statement, it was different they couldn't provide this amount evidence against her because the trail wasn't against her. I was on ambers side when the op-ed first came out back in day, now i am on johnnys side because now can see clearly who is lying who is in the wrong and who was the abuser.
Remember how you said you hate talking about this and here you are again lol
I’m sorry, but are you seriously backing a person who committed domestic violence to come back? If this was the other way round you’d be ranting about how bad a studio would be to hire them. She shouldn’t work in Hollywood again.
I mean the amount of people in Hollywood who have allegedly or been charged with domestic abuse or a drunken fight and come back is so big that I genuinely think if they said bye to all of them half of Hollywood would be gone
For me it's not the fact that she is a domestic abuser. It's that she literally had a years-long campaign of fabricating injuries and committing a fraud to defame someone in a disturbingly calculated way. I honestly don't understand how that's not a criminal offense.
@@WastedPo she’s just a vile human-being with a unfounded sense of entitlement. I think it will be looked at, I know Australia are already investigating her, so I wouldn’t be surprised if the American authorities start looking too.
there are a few guys that did stuff and came back to Hollywood
@@cjspyker I’m not saying people don’t deserve a second chance (depending on what they’ve done), but there’s a huge difference between doing drink and drugs and actually being a DV offender (in more than 1 instance). The fact people just accept it is the worrying part. There are plenty of actor I refuse to watch cos of their real life actions (Kevin Spacy immediately comes to mind).
The public doesn't like her, because she's an abuser who accused her victim of her own crimes. That's despicable and pretty unforgivable.
Honestly wouldn’t be surprised if the next time we see him on screen there will be a round of applause
I can't trust a thing those 2 dudes on this show says, I mean for Fooks sake Amber is a horrible actress. I cried on command in front of a judge to show how sorry I was for my 3rd arrest. Got probation and released that day, committed 4 crimes 8 hours after release. That's acting I don't know what the hell she was doing.
Oh, and the UK trial was not about abuse, it was Johnny going after The Sun for printing her side of the story (that a US jury found to be all lies) without any proof of abuse. The Sun case was a Libel case, but he lost that one even though there was a conflict of interest with the judge having connections to Amber outside of the court. Please do more research before you just start speaking, it took me 15 seconds on Google to find this out... and it only took that long cause I packed a bowl first.
Hey John Johnny Deep will get his career back dude, and he won the public opinion, which is the most important part! People will tune in to see him in future movies 🍿 which means more money 💰 than the $10 million he is getting. Plus the UK 🇬🇧 court is super duper bias ASF
UK court used Amber's non existent charity donations as the basis for the assertion she is not a "Gold Digger" and then inferred from this that she was not conducting a hoax & would have no reason to lie about abuse. It was crazy and the judge should have recused.
John should have Black Belt Barrister appear to give it some context as a UK lawyer , they can even talk martial arts!
John it's really obvious you did not watch the US trial and completely misunderstood the ruling of the UK trial. You have a huge platform and it's irresponsible to twist the facts and spread misinformation. Oh and Amber is a terrible actress...she couldnt even produce a tear on the stand while talking about her alleged abuse.
Says the guy spreading misinformation…
@@aidanfoley6463 nothing in my original comment is misinformation. Amber couldn't cry on the stand, John has said in a previous video he wasn't paying attention to the trial, and he keeps erroneously speaking about the ruling in the UK trial.
So WB will still let Amber be in Aquaman even if 10 mins, they will still let Ezra be in the Flash…… YET THEY WILL CUT OFF JOHNNY. Make it make sense. What a joke of a company. If I am Johnny I’d never work with them again either way.
Well John I guess you were dead wrong about this one
John for a previous lawyer, you’re not looking at the details. Just admit you don’t understand this case
He'd never do that
@@jamiekelly6851 this is a movie talk show, not a courtroom show.
Johnny deserves a second chance he’s made mistakes in the past but haven’t we all
What mistakes? besides the average human mistakes.
@@theoutlawking9123 True
@@sclark6807 I mean the drugs
@@joshgaming3106 Come on, hes an actor, they all do drugs.
@@sclark6807 Some do, less than you'd assume but more than you'd hope
imagine if WB hadn't removed Johnny from fantastic beasts 3 they would be racking in the money right now with all the support Johnny has received from this trial
People should not talk about a topic if they have not closely followed the details.
He does that a lot I’ve noticed
We’re gonna hear cheers in the theater the next time Johnny hits that silver screen! 🍿 🎥 And Amber is going to be filming Walmart employee training videos
😂😂😂
The UK trial is under investigation.
It won't be surprising if the results are thrown out and it's either done again or Johnny is just granted victory.
The judge in that case literally cited the fact that she gave her settlement money to charity as a reason why he was willing to trust her word over Johnny's, that is what his verdict came down to, who do I believe more? Turns out he believed a liar, & it is possible that the verdict in that case could be overturned, but that would require Johnny saying he wants another trial, not sure he would want that.
Watching John beat down a victim of domestic violence is…well, I honestly thought better of him than this. You yourself made a video about what if he won the case, and now you’re playing takebacksies and insisting he should continue to be punished and pilloried. Why do you assist the abuser in attacking her victim like this? You’re doing exactly what she wanted the world to do - join in her cruelty. Why? Because you don’t like POTC? How petty.
It hurts my heart. I’ve always thought of John as one of the kinder, more wholesome hosts here. But I hate how he handles this topic and his derision and condemnation of a victim just feels icky. I’ve been watching since 2017, but I think I need to take a step back from this channel’s content.
My thoughts exactly but hatred of men is embedded deep within society
You are obviously did not pay attention to a word he's saying. Do you honestly expect John campea to have the same opinion as you or everyone else? And now you feel so hurt on what you think he said that he clearly did not said what you said that you need a break from his channel content because he's not what you think he was? Horses(h)it
@@mgsgamer what?
I've had the same regard for John long term too.
I hope he actually goes over the trial properly and gets right, this is a tremendous slap in the face for men who have run ins with Abusive women.
@@johnnyweiner746horses sit on what?
He can make a comeback. Put him in the MCU as mephisto!
We need a sequel to what's eating gilberts grape
I don’t think he’d be best used in the MCU since he’s such a great character actor but I’d love to see him hop on testosterone and transform into an MCU character. Can you imagine an old jacked JD?
@@Zachary_Dale im sure he will be in a future pirates movie. Another jack sparrow movie equals a billion dollars for disney
I think you got this one wrong John. There is a massive sentiment towards Johnny, this trial serves as a slingshot to his career. He is undoubtedly now a major asset to any film he is in, so I think studios will be chasing him, not just rolling the dice warily. Something fundamental changed in this trial. Before this trial, for most people it was just a he said she said kind of thing, and a lot tended to believe AH based on ME2 and such sentiments. However, millions of people saw her credibility being destroyed on the stand testifying, and the vast majority of people now believe Johnny was the victim here, not the aggressor and that creates a wave of sympathy that will have massive impact on his next projects. My bet - he'll be back to A-list very soon.
Idk. The films will have to be entertaining. Depp’s previous film were not great and the box office showed in the eyes of the audience besides the Pirates films. I don’t think Disney will take him back.
@@Literal_Sense Yeah, but I'm saying the current wave of sympathy towards him will make him an asset in the box office. That's my claim, that the trial serves a slingshot to his career.
Amber Heard was not a good actress when she was on the stand. Terrible acting and fake crying.
The thing I don't get is how was he found guilty in the UK if there was no evidence of him abusing her???
They allow Heresay in the UK. The UK lawsuit was bullshit based on laws
@@dannyo5364 Exactly, she didn't have to provide actual proof of abuse besides her words. Which is Heresay.
@@TevinLWright21 that doesn’t seem right then that they ruled him guilty in the UK
@@MrGMovieReviews The judge technically didn't rule in his favor for the sun using the words "wife beater" based off of Heards testimony in the UK.
Amber is a good actress, WTF Am I hearing, I dont even like her in Aquaman which is btw her biggest role yet.
I think there's a possibility that Johnny's career will be restored because if you followed the trial and social media, the amount of people supporting him is staggering. People really feel like he was wronged by Amber Heard. Before with the UK trial because it wasn't public, a lot of people (including studios) had no idea just how badly Amber was lying and treating JD. Now with this trial public, I believe many studios will give JD a second chance. Especially seeing how many people are behind him now.
The UK court case was biased af for Amber
That UK trial sound real sketchy
and one that takes place in buttcrack Virginia is not
@@Nicho213007 Let me guess, you're one of those "belive all women" fools?
I'm from the UK and the judge who was ruling on the case had a Son as an editor of the Sun news paper. The UK justice system is well known the circle the wagon and protect the establishment with regards to their press.
@Nicho213007 So you ignore all the audios of AH admitting to hitting, starting physical fights, mentally, physically and emotionally ab using JD. I am guessing you also didn't see the trial where she lied about ab use and there were pictures the next day that showed no ab use. But yet JD had a black eye in several pictures EM had a black eye while dating AH. AH was photograph with bruised knockles after one of her physical fights that she starts. You need to open your eyes and support women that are actually ab used not AH the lier
Amber can make money with an OF account 🤣
Word lol 😂
lmfao bro nah she only good for instagram famous now :D
Massively misrepresenting the whole reason of the UK trial.
Disagree, she’s a terrible actress
After winning this trial, Johnny stan-dom has hit an all time high. It would be foolish of Disney not to keep Johnny on in Pirates or whatever franchise. As was already stated in this thread, John, you're clueless about the crazy love for JD right now.
John is proof that Amber Heard defamed Johnny lmao
He wasn’t defamed because he abused her
@@jameson5755 AH was the only ab user in that relationship. Explain why there is no proof that she had any injuries.
Why you guys keep saying Johnny lost uk case? The uk case was corrupt, therefore irrelevant, Johnny 1 - Abuser 0!!
I'm surprised that John and the panel didn't mention that Walter Hamada testified [looking seriously pissed while doing so....] ,for Depp's side. He stated that AB had a diminished role in Aquaman 2 due to her lack of chemistry with Jason Momoa. She was instructed by WB NOT to even mention them during the trial. Also, one of her witnesses described key plot points and spoilers from Aquaman 2. If she does appeal, the timing of that may coincide with the film's release. This is not the same thing as Armie Hammer and Murder on the Nile where it's a major ensemble piece, so sticking someone in the background in the posters will work. No, she's Mera and will have to be front and center for the film's press tour. So now WB has to do some major crisis management with both Heard and Miller. Karma for not bringing back Henry Cavill......
Also Heard committed perjury in the UK case. She may face consequences.
She's probably just not going over there or to Australia especially.
AH-s most honest performance was in Zombieland when as a zombie she chased Jesse Eisenbergs character all over the house trying to eat him. That practically foreshadowed her entire relationship with Johnny.
This right here is a side-effect of only following biased news outlets like variety, you should have just followed trial or just go watch LegalBytes' recaps dude.
amber heard isn’t appealing btw john unless she wants to pay 10+ million dollars just to lose again
She's not a good actress 😂.
I wouldn’t pay much attention to what the uk court said the court system here is a joke
British courts are very pro women in domestic abuse cases , and they tend to believe a lot of what the woman tends to say
I hope is shows men that they don’t have to be afraid to speak up about abuse, especially abuse from women.
Hopefully more men now will be willing to speak out
issue is people keep talking about the last pirates of the Caribbean film and him being late and being injured (an injury heard apparently caused) delaying produ tion and pissing off Disney execs, he also went back on the substances but has anyone considered that all may have been as a result of the abuse we now know he was being subjected to by his wife?
Here's a followup question for you. How do you explain the number of box office flops he headlined between Pirates 4 and 5?
@@carladams9345 So you haven’t seen The Lone Ranger, Transcendence, Mortdecai, or Alice Through the Looking Glass?
@@jaybling6687 here’s a better response. She lost. get over it.
@@lawrencelord9777 I’m not defending her. Outside of Aquaman being a big hit, she doesn’t have any notable projects. And as Kris said, she’s not a standout performer. So Hollywood doesn’t lose anything if she doesn’t work again. But Depp’s career status was becoming questionable even before this drama unfolded with the examples I gave.
@@carladams9345 All of them came out between Pirates 4 and 5.
But sir .. Warner Brothers are indeed working with him again because he is in the cast of beetle juice 2 .
Lets not kid ourselves, AH was never an actress of great talent. If it wasn't for Johnny's influence and star power, its likely she would be nothing less than a C list actress stuck in guest star roles in TV dramas like The OC or landing insignificant parts in bad movies.
I wish John looked more in depth at the case in UK to see how it was a mockery!!!
I already know this clip would make me angry. So I’m just gonna skip this one lmaoo
Amber Heard clearly can act??? You havent watch the trial have you guys? lmao...
Her career was kinda done once the poopa story dropped
I imagine Depp is only going to be taking projects that he’s personally interested in,
people forget “Waiting for the Barbarians” he was great in that.