Sounds like I’ll need to get started on a part two! I would recommend Unearthing The Bible by Titus Kennedy. There are tons of cool discoveries in that book. It’s pretty brief on each but it gives a great overview. Thanks for the feedback!
There is so much controversy among non-believers concerning Daniel and his prophecies. Many non-believing scholars date the writing of Daniel centuries after Nebuchadnezzar's reign because they do not believe the accuracy of his prophetic words. Of course we know that God's Prophets had to be 100% accurate, and Daniel was! As far as I have read, scholars have found no record that the Darius of Daniel 6 was a historical person. Yes, please do a part 2.
A prime example for human blind and rude pride is the people that dismiss ancient scriptures full of intricate details, preseved by the generations - fiction!! I mean how on earth can you conclude that?!?! Some people!!
The fiction, @user-yq2tu5bd5i, is the spiritual interpretation overlaid over historical detail. Accuracy of historical detail means NOTHING regarding claims about God. For example: Yes, it is accurate to say donald trump was the 45th President of the United States. This fact does NOT in any way prove trump was "anointed by God" as thousands of people claim.
There is a reason why non-believers attack the book of Daniel. Jesus Himself referred to Daniel, so if you can make Daniel out as a forgery, the divinity of Christ starts to crumble. Do not give into that temptation and believe!
Stephen King's books 'confirm' the existence of many, many contemporary things, but that does not make Stephen Kings stories all true. Some true facts thrown in with a lot of fiction does not make a history, it just makes the overall story seem more realistic.
Ha Ha, rather childish but some humour. It does distort/deny the role of exactly such information and discoveries in archaeological & historical evidence & confirmation. You appear to be easily triggered by the legitimate use of a simple word. Maybe your overreaction is prejudice & maybe not. It depends on how serious your "joke " was🤔
Being surprised by the finds of biblical archaeology is like being surprised after finding the original of a story after reading fan fictions about it. There of course are elements of truth (or the original work) in it. But that doesn't prove the information in the bible (or the fan fiction) to be true (or canon). Still an interesting discipline (and well funded, unlike other archaeological disciplines)
@@ronbyrd1616 XD then the Ilias would be true because we found Troia. The stories collected in the bible are still myths. Won't judge anyone for believing in them of course. Believing isn't knowing though.
@@ronbyrd1616 Not at all. You would EXPECT writers to get some basic facts about the settings in their stories correct. For example, when writing the Spider-Man comics, many artists and writers use real-world references. 2,000 years from now, intelligent people wouldn't decide that since New York was proven to be a real place, then Spider-Man must be real, too. They would look for evidence of New York AND look for evidence of super-powers as two separate claims. We are still waiting for evidence of ANY of the supernatural claims of the Bible, and no amount of evidence for the mundane will satisfy those claims. Even if it was demonstrated beyond all doubt that mankind originated from two people, the claim that God created them would still need to be supported by further evidence. Otherwise, the claim that those two people came from aliens would be just as valid as any other claim, if there were no evidence. Speaking of myths, you do realize that Greek mythology correctly names many real places and people, right? Yet you don't believe in Zeus, I assume? Same reason.
@@saintmalaclypse3217you're just being incredibly childish It's ridiculous to take a presumed error in the Bible as evidence that the Bible is false & simultaneously say but if its true it's in way evidence that it is not false. In relative terms at least the balance of the evidence has shifted.
@@josephodoherty7864 A book, any book, can contain truths and falsehoods. You cannot assume that because a part of a story is true, it must all be true. Each claim stands on its own merit. Even if you verify every historical claim in the bible down to the last "begat", none of that would point to a single miracle being true. It's childish to assume otherwise. Speaking of which, children learn this when they find mistakes in a textbook. They're quickly taught that a single mistake is just that - a single mistake, which stands on its own, and affects nothing of the rest of the book. Why don't you understand that, if children do?
So what , someone is named in a book, and there is evidence for a ruler by archaeology, this makes other claims per se not (more) true from that book....🧐☝️The city of Ebla is not found in the bible, but has played a huge role in the neighborhood, strange.
Why so easily triggered? The video specifically mentioned how a seeming error of one logical or factual category is, often, taken as evidence against the truth of other elements in the book/story and that being so it's totally valid to say that in that case evidence for the disputed material is in contrast a relative shift in the balance of evidence. It's not earth shattering but your antagonism says more about you & how you evaluate facts around this topic than it is a criticism of the beliefs of others.
First, Daniel didn’t write the book, second…the information you offered was already known for over 150 years, it’s not new news to me or many other people! Lastly there’s in the biblical narrative mythology, legends and history! If you’re unable to recognize that…school hasn’t been useful!
It was new to me, so I'm great full he has made this video. After reading your reply, I believe you to be an arrogant self opinionated little man who likes to run his mouth off. He had gone to quit some trouble to make this video for people like me that don't have that information.
Can't wait for part two, thank you for your time and dedication.
Thanks for watching!
Part two, definitely!
Really well put together video! Keep up the great work! I can't believe you only have 166 subscribers - you deserve more!
Thank you so much for the feedback!
Definitely would like to see more archaeological discoveries corroborating the Bible!
Yes please make a 2nd part. If you can provide some sources for further study, that would make it even more awesome. Thank you!!
Sounds like I’ll need to get started on a part two! I would recommend Unearthing The Bible by Titus Kennedy. There are tons of cool discoveries in that book. It’s pretty brief on each but it gives a great overview. Thanks for the feedback!
Great channel!
Thank you!
Thanks. I'd like to see more. Archeology is something I know little about. Nice to have verification.
There is so much controversy among non-believers concerning Daniel and his prophecies. Many non-believing scholars date the writing of Daniel centuries after Nebuchadnezzar's reign because they do not believe the accuracy of his prophetic words. Of course we know that God's Prophets had to be 100% accurate, and Daniel was! As far as I have read, scholars have found no record that the Darius of Daniel 6 was a historical person. Yes, please do a part 2.
A prime example for human blind and rude pride is the people that dismiss ancient scriptures full of intricate details, preseved by the generations - fiction!!
I mean how on earth can you conclude that?!?!
Some people!!
The fiction, @user-yq2tu5bd5i, is the spiritual interpretation overlaid over historical detail.
Accuracy of historical detail means NOTHING regarding claims about God.
For example: Yes, it is accurate to say donald trump was the 45th President of the United States.
This fact does NOT in any way prove trump was "anointed by God" as thousands of people claim.
In which museums are the cylinder and tablet displayed?
Seems to me Denying such a Book as Daniel warrants denying the entire Old Testament! It is the New Testament that we should question!
There is a reason why non-believers attack the book of Daniel. Jesus Himself referred to Daniel, so if you can make Daniel out as a forgery, the divinity of Christ starts to crumble. Do not give into that temptation and believe!
Stephen King's books 'confirm' the existence of many, many contemporary things, but that does not make Stephen Kings stories all true. Some true facts thrown in with a lot of fiction does not make a history, it just makes the overall story seem more realistic.
Ha Ha, rather childish but some humour. It does distort/deny the role of exactly such information and discoveries in archaeological & historical evidence & confirmation. You appear to be easily triggered by the legitimate use of a simple word. Maybe your overreaction is prejudice & maybe not. It depends on how serious your "joke " was🤔
Being surprised by the finds of biblical archaeology is like being surprised after finding the original of a story after reading fan fictions about it.
There of course are elements of truth (or the original work) in it. But that doesn't prove the information in the bible (or the fan fiction) to be true (or canon).
Still an interesting discipline (and well funded, unlike other archaeological disciplines)
It proves, in addition to it being a corroborated fact, that those calling the HOLY SCRIPTURES a myth and a lie, wrong .
@@ronbyrd1616 XD then the Ilias would be true because we found Troia. The stories collected in the bible are still myths. Won't judge anyone for believing in them of course. Believing isn't knowing though.
@@ronbyrd1616 Not at all. You would EXPECT writers to get some basic facts about the settings in their stories correct. For example, when writing the Spider-Man comics, many artists and writers use real-world references. 2,000 years from now, intelligent people wouldn't decide that since New York was proven to be a real place, then Spider-Man must be real, too. They would look for evidence of New York AND look for evidence of super-powers as two separate claims.
We are still waiting for evidence of ANY of the supernatural claims of the Bible, and no amount of evidence for the mundane will satisfy those claims. Even if it was demonstrated beyond all doubt that mankind originated from two people, the claim that God created them would still need to be supported by further evidence. Otherwise, the claim that those two people came from aliens would be just as valid as any other claim, if there were no evidence.
Speaking of myths, you do realize that Greek mythology correctly names many real places and people, right? Yet you don't believe in Zeus, I assume? Same reason.
@@saintmalaclypse3217you're just being incredibly childish
It's ridiculous to take a presumed error in the Bible as evidence that the Bible is false & simultaneously say but if its true it's in way evidence that it is not false. In relative terms at least the balance of the evidence has shifted.
@@josephodoherty7864 A book, any book, can contain truths and falsehoods. You cannot assume that because a part of a story is true, it must all be true. Each claim stands on its own merit. Even if you verify every historical claim in the bible down to the last "begat", none of that would point to a single miracle being true.
It's childish to assume otherwise. Speaking of which, children learn this when they find mistakes in a textbook. They're quickly taught that a single mistake is just that - a single mistake, which stands on its own, and affects nothing of the rest of the book. Why don't you understand that, if children do?
So what , someone is named in a book, and there is evidence for a ruler by archaeology, this makes other claims per se not (more) true from that book....🧐☝️The city of Ebla is not found in the bible, but has played a huge role in the neighborhood, strange.
Why so easily triggered? The video specifically mentioned how a seeming error of one logical or factual category is, often, taken as evidence against the truth of other elements in the book/story and that being so it's totally valid to say that in that case evidence for the disputed material is in contrast a relative shift in the balance of evidence. It's not earth shattering but your antagonism says more about you & how you evaluate facts around this topic than it is a criticism of the beliefs of others.
@@josephodoherty7864 Ad Hominem ?
First, Daniel didn’t write the book, second…the information you offered was already known for over 150 years, it’s not new news to me or many other people! Lastly there’s in the biblical narrative mythology, legends and history! If you’re unable to recognize that…school hasn’t been useful!
It was new to me, so I'm great full he has made this video. After reading your reply, I believe you to be an arrogant self opinionated little man who likes to run his mouth off. He had gone to quit some trouble to make this video for people like me that don't have that information.