As for the day lights, I find this really usefull from a driver perspective. When the car is moving it supposed to have them on, so they would be visible on the road, regardles the weather or daytime. Even during the sunny day, if you are driving towards the sun, you are blinded, those lights of a car coming towards you are still visible and you can be warn that something is comming your way. There are numerous dash cam videos where the accident could be avoided if a driver doing a sudden manuveur in a limited visibility, hit a car with no lights on, simply because it was not visible on the road and the driver who caused the accident, had a limited information about the road situation and made a wrong decision.
It's also safty measure for people. If you are crossing parking lot or a street you can see which car is moving or will be moving towards you. Without lights on you might think it's still and when you start crossing street you might be run over.
You have an amazing and clear headed wife and she totally rocks that short boyish haircut. I dont think the laws you mentioned are that weird though. They make sense to me.
Oh yeah, the wildlife thing is taken very seriously here. And honestly rightfully so. If it wasn't some species would have died out long time ago. I thought it was common in Europe but apparently not. Few years ago one żubr crossed the border to Germany, it was the first wild żubr on German soil since the beginning of 20th century. Someone saw it and got scared so they informed the local authorities and they supposedly "didn't know what to do" and they SHOT IT. I honestly don't know what was going on inside those people's heads. I'm also very sad about the poor żubry that died here recently, but in this case I think soldiers didn't want that to happen BUT they should be more careful for sure.
That is only one reason why I want to leave my country and go to Poland. The Polish have a great respect for life and nature in general. Here ppl are scared of the most common things, if the press or TV tells them. No common sense. They go to the woods and want them empty, no animals, everything is automatically dangerous, if they encounter an animal, it must be wrong. At least they don't want it there, even better shot. 😢They would not build a proper fence for their chickens, but have all foxes killed. Then they tell you how dangerous rabies is which is not the topic, does not even exist anymore here, and the foxes are healthy, but they feel like they need to inform you about a disease they read about in school years ago to look smart. Just pure nonsense killing you daily. Maybe that's why I married a Pole, love the groundedness and life attitude ❤😂
about the drinking in public rights: city councils who are in general not as stupid as the government have the possibility to overturn this absurd law by designating some zones where the drinking is allowed. So f.ex. in Poznań where I live you literally have the signs saying "here you are allowed to drink alcohol" f.ex. at the Warta river
Niepicie na ulicy czy podobne miejsca jest słuszne, więc nie zaden glupi rząd a raczej glupi ten co chla na ulicy zamiast kulturalnie usiąść przy stoliku, wlac piwo do kielicha i tak wypić
The weirdest Polish law for me is that a firearms license holder is not allowed to own even a single piece of ammunition without owning a matching firearm at the exact same time. So you have all the paperwork to go buy a gun together with as much ammo as you have the money for. However being in possession of ammo alone without a matching gun is by law equal to owning an illegal firearm. That's between 2 and 8 years of prison. Insane if you consider that it is fully legal to borrow guns and ammo at a shooting range. Someone can just eject an unused round out and drop it into your bag and by the time you exit the range you will technically be a felon. This even includes the caliber you are eligible to buy if you were to buy the firearm first. You can't even sell the gun alone and keep the ammo until you buy a replacement. In such a case you either buy a replacement first and then sell the first one, or sell the first one together with the ammo and when you buy the second one you buy ammo again. This absolutely retarded law can be traced back to the 1961 Bill of weapons, ammunition and explosives when all the legal guns were owned by the communist state and only leased to the selected officials.
Niby dlaczego jest to Twoim zdaniem głupie prawo? Tak właściwie to po co komuś amunicja bez broni? Rozumiem podejście, że dla samego faktu, bo czemu niby nie, ale z drugiej strony - jeśli ma się ściśle uregulowaną politykę dostępu do broni, to całkowicie normalne, że starać się ona będzie obejmować jak najszerszy zakres tegoż (naturalnie, nigdy tak naprawdę tego nie osiągnie, bo zawsze znajdzie się „coś jeszcze” np. powiedzmy szara strefa starych broni czarnoprochowych, no ale to inny temat). A z drugiej strony powiedzieć można: załatwi ktoś gdzieś se nielegalnie giwerę, to po co mu ułatwiać zadanie, żeby już miał w zanadrzu naboje kupione. Albo że wykorzysta naboje do konstrukcji jakieś własnej broni. Głupie czy nie - to zależy jak kto patrzy na powszechny dostęp lub nie. Ale czy jakieś dziwne czy szokujące? Nie powiedział bym.
@@GrandePaco. A rozumiesz, że piszę o posiadaczach pozwoleń? Takich co mają w domu promesy i mogą za godzinę wrócić do domu z bronią i amunicją. W tym także sportowców i myśliwych, którzy mogą pożyczyć broń razem z amunicją od kolegi z pozwoleniem. Tym właśnie ludziom zabrania się kupić choćby jednego naboju, który mogli by wykorzystać w broni klubowej czy w broni kolegi. Tak samo nie wolno im sprzedać broni zostawiając sobie amunicję gdy następna broń ma być w tym samym kalibrze. Ten przepis ma korzenie w komunistycznej Ustawie z 1961 roku kiedy legalna broń była wyłącznie państwowa. Wydawano broń razem z amunicją, a potem zdawałeś broń razem z amunicją. Obecnie jest to sztuczna przeszkoda, która legalnym posiadaczom na maksa utrudnia życie, a obchodzi się to kupując i rejestrując najtańszy złom w danym kalibrze. Wtedy w tym kalibrze kupujesz pestki bez limitu.
Kolejne niezrozumienie polskiego prawa Przed podejściem do egzaminu, każdy przyszły kierowca wykonuje szereg badań, których celem jest wykrycie ewentualnych przeciwwskazań do prowadzenia pojazdu. Lekarz, wyspecjalizowany w badaniu kierowców, wskazuje ewentualne wymogi lub ograniczenia wynikające ze stanu zdrowia kierowcy. W przypadku wykrycia wady wzroku, stosowna adnotacja trafi do karty badań przyszłego kierowcy. Taki kandydat będzie zdawał egzamin w zaleconych soczewkach kontaktowych lub okularach (w przypadku ich braku, zdający nie zostanie dopuszczony do egzaminu). Po zdaniu egzaminu, kierowca otrzyma dokument ze stosowną adnotacją, dotyczącą wymogu noszenia okularów lub soczewek podczas kierowania samochodem. Zapis ten można znaleźć w polu nr 12 prawa jazdy. Stosuje się następujące oznaczenia: • 01.01 - dla okularów, • 01.02 - dla soczewek kontaktowych, • 01.03 - dla szkieł ochronnych, • 01.04 - dla szkieł matowych, • 01.05 - dla przepaski na oko, • 01.06 - dla okularów lub szkieł kontaktowych. Rozdzielenie soczewek i okularów zastosowano, ponieważ przy niektórych wadach wzroku nie zaleca się noszenia szkieł kontaktowych.
Where? In the UK it's called low beam and high beam. There is no requirement to have the headlights on here during the day. I have not heard the term "daytime running lights", which is used differently (I guess) to low beam and high beam, which are more technical terms to distinguish between those two modes of headlights. @@VigosDad
@@KamilsView I guess the daytime lights is a feature in the new cars, that have such option available. I.e some cars have a led lights that works only during the day, and after sunset they swtich to a normal low beam
You mentioned drinking in public places. But there is also ATTEMBTED drinking in public. Attembting here means that you eighter opened or moved drink to your mouth but didn't drink. The punishment is fine higher than for drinking in public. Ex Dee.
The law for the lights is actually all lights not daylight lights. Technically illegal not to have all the lights on but seems that newer cars that come with daylight lights no one cars even the police. I see the police all the time with no taillights. The issue I have is when there is fog or raining people think their lights are on and not so hard to see cars sometimes. The karp from what I read was from the EU. I remember seeing the live carp in the stores but now not so much. The thing is that Poles would leave in the bathtub for a few days to clean them in order to eat. The carp is still killed to sale so not sure what the agenda was here. On the phone in the crosswalk law came out last year or this year. New law. It went in effect with the new law that if you see a pedestrian coming to the crosswalk you have to stop. They do not need to wait to cross the cars must stop if it looks like someone wants to cross. Some of the others I have not heard before. For hands on wheel makes no sense as you need to shift when in the towns.
If Muslims can get DEADLY offended by cartoon in foreign country polish people have full right to be offened at someone mocking their believes in thier own country.
You are completely wrong about the law on insulting religious feelings. First of all, this provision applies to all religions, Judaism, Orthodoxy, Islam, etc., not only Catholicism. The provision literally reads: "Whoever offends the religious feelings of other people by publicly insulting an object of religious worship or a place intended for the public performance of religious rites, shall be subject to a fine, restriction of liberty or imprisonment for up to 2 years" (Article 196 of the Penal Code). A few years ago, there was a case of someone being sentenced under this provision for throwing a pig's head into the mosque, which was considered by the court to be an insult to the religious feelings of Muslims, because pork is considered unclean food in this religion. Questioning the authority of the Church is common in Poland and is not subject to any penalization. The Church does not control anything or anyone and has never sued anyone under the above article. An insult to feelings cannot concern an institution (an institution has no feelings), but only a private person. If criminal proceedings are pending in this respect, it is only on the initiative of a private person who felt offended. Private individuals often misunderstand this provision, which leads to unnecessary criminal proceedings, which are usually won by the accused persons. If such a right exists, people use it, not always wisely. There is nothing to worry about really, if you not intend deliberately hurt someones religious feelings.
Doesn't matter if it is a crosswalk with light or no lights. If you are using your phone in a way that signifficantly, limits your awarnes during crossing, that's an offence. You may talk on the phone while crossing if you are looking around you and and not on the screen. Same with the headphones. You must be aware during crossing so if your hearing is impaired by music, your eyes has to be able to monitor your surroundings. it is related with numerous accidents whre people were not paing attention to whats around them while crossing and they were either walking on "early red", were hit by an abmulance or other vechicles rushing for emergency or just bumping onto other peoples or cars that stopped on the 'zebra' in the traffic. You must remember that pedestrians while crossing the street are also obligated to the same laws as drivers- they are not "holy cows" so they must obey the same principles as the other users of the roads- limited trust, awarnes and safety percoutios adjusted to the circumstances and weather conditions. After all even if you had all the rights while crossing, you will tell that to the mortitian while they will be preparing you for the funeral after being unalived by the car that hit you. Stay safe
Oczywiście jest zakazane w obu przypadkach: PoRD art. 14 Zabrania sie: ... 8) korzystania z telefonu lub innego urządzenia elektronicznego podczas wchodzenia lub przechodzenia przez jezdnię, drogę dla rowerów lub torowisko, w tym również podczas wchodzenia lub przechodzenia przez przejście dla pieszych - w sposób, który prowadzi do ograniczenia możliwości obserwacji sytuacji na jezdni, drodze dla rowerów, torowisku lub przejściu dla pieszych.
Jeśli chodzi o soczewki i jazdę... O ile się dobrze orientuję, to na prawie jazdy pod "12" powinien być wpisany odpowiedni kod. Okulary mają 1.02, a soczewki chyba 1.06. W tym przypadku ma to sens jeśli chodzi o wykroczenie(?), bo ma się stwierdzoną wadę wzroku i luźno można stwierdzić, że ktoś np prowadzi, a nie widzi za dobrze. Dany kod będzie upoważniał do jazdy w wymaganych do tego okularach/soczewkach. Poprawcie mnie jeśli się mylę, bo sama żadnej wady wzorku nie mam, więc też takiego wpisu na moim prawku brak.
Inaczej - jeśli masz ograniczenie na okulary (01.01) a pojedziesz w soczewkach, to zgodnie z aktualnymi przepisami odpowiadasz tak samo, jakbyś prawka nie miał. Najlepiej w takim przypadku mieć kod 01 (bez drugiej części) albo 01.06, które pozwala na jazdę w okularach lub soczewkach. W przeciwnym wypadku masz 1500 zł mandatu za jazdę bez uprawnień
@@Immigrantwriter Hahahaha🤣🤣 ihr seid so ein süßes Ehepaar ❤️. İhr habt zwar nicht gefragt aber ich sage es trotzdem, ich bin eine Türkin und bin geboren und aufgewachsen hier in Deutschland. Ich liebe es genauso die verschiedenen Kulturen zu beobachten und mir Gedanken zu machen warum das so ist
3:08 - the logic is you inherit the whole estate. You either take upon all the deeds of your ancestor, both the prizes they earned through their life as well as punishments, or you denounce it. When you get in debt, the debtors are the first in line for the money of your estate, not your inheritors. That is cause you made a lawful contract with the lenders. Children have right to fruits of your life, but if you spoiled those fruits, it's your fault not lenders. This way people with deadly illnesses cannot just borrow absurd amounts and then die enriching their kids with someone's else money, but still can get into debt if they need for whatever reason. So it's actually a perfect solution. Well... except that you can inherit a hidden debt in some circumstances, but that's a quirk that can be worked out.
3:25 - the justification is that it's easier to distinguish cars in motion with cars parked alongside the road that way. Usefull in cities, but yeah, maybe it shouldn't be a law? It's quite new.
1:55 - I think this law is treated differently in Poland than in lot of countries. Like you said, in Latin America it is seen as unnecessary law, so it isn't a law. In western Europe it is an actual law. You won't ever see a German jaywalking unless he is running for his life. In Poland everyone agrees it should be a law... and that it should be broken on will. "Law" in Poland isn't actually that respected of a concept. It's like playing Munchkin - rules are only there to punish you if you get caught. Jaywalking is seen as a non-issue, cause if you paid enough attention to not get caught while doing it - you are doing it safely, while if you get caught - you clearly weren't paying attention and deserve to be punished. People live here by their morality, not "the Law". Law is what it is cause of history and that's the best we can do. Doesn't mean we will like it or follow it. Similarly treated are drugs or speeding and many more victimless crimes.
In Vermont USA there is a law making it illegal to whistle under water 😂😂😂
😁
that’s what I’m talking about 😂
As for the day lights, I find this really usefull from a driver perspective. When the car is moving it supposed to have them on, so they would be visible on the road, regardles the weather or daytime. Even during the sunny day, if you are driving towards the sun, you are blinded, those lights of a car coming towards you are still visible and you can be warn that something is comming your way. There are numerous dash cam videos where the accident could be avoided if a driver doing a sudden manuveur in a limited visibility, hit a car with no lights on, simply because it was not visible on the road and the driver who caused the accident, had a limited information about the road situation and made a wrong decision.
It's also safty measure for people. If you are crossing parking lot or a street you can see which car is moving or will be moving towards you. Without lights on you might think it's still and when you start crossing street you might be run over.
Thank you for the video and Merry Christmas 🎄 to your family, Feliz Navidad
You have an amazing and clear headed wife and she totally rocks that short boyish haircut. I dont think the laws you mentioned are that weird though. They make sense to me.
Yes! She has a natural beauty and elegance and reminds me of Princess Diana somehow❤
@@Rudelherz loool, Diana, literally!!! :D
Oh yeah, the wildlife thing is taken very seriously here. And honestly rightfully so. If it wasn't some species would have died out long time ago. I thought it was common in Europe but apparently not. Few years ago one żubr crossed the border to Germany, it was the first wild żubr on German soil since the beginning of 20th century. Someone saw it and got scared so they informed the local authorities and they supposedly "didn't know what to do" and they SHOT IT. I honestly don't know what was going on inside those people's heads. I'm also very sad about the poor żubry that died here recently, but in this case I think soldiers didn't want that to happen BUT they should be more careful for sure.
That is only one reason why I want to leave my country and go to Poland. The Polish have a great respect for life and nature in general. Here ppl are scared of the most common things, if the press or TV tells them. No common sense. They go to the woods and want them empty, no animals, everything is automatically dangerous, if they encounter an animal, it must be wrong. At least they don't want it there, even better shot. 😢They would not build a proper fence for their chickens, but have all foxes killed. Then they tell you how dangerous rabies is which is not the topic, does not even exist anymore here, and the foxes are healthy, but they feel like they need to inform you about a disease they read about in school years ago to look smart. Just pure nonsense killing you daily. Maybe that's why I married a Pole, love the groundedness and life attitude ❤😂
about the drinking in public rights: city councils who are in general not as stupid as the government have the possibility to overturn this absurd law by designating some zones where the drinking is allowed. So f.ex. in Poznań where I live you literally have the signs saying "here you are allowed to drink alcohol" f.ex. at the Warta river
Niepicie na ulicy czy podobne miejsca jest słuszne, więc nie zaden glupi rząd a raczej glupi ten co chla na ulicy zamiast kulturalnie usiąść przy stoliku, wlac piwo do kielicha i tak wypić
You both are adorable ❤
I wanna know the strangest law of all time!!! 🤗
that's the bison story 😥 notesfrompoland.com/2023/12/04/two-bison-killed-in-collision-with-polish-army-truck-following-similar-incident-last-month/
The weirdest Polish law for me is that a firearms license holder is not allowed to own even a single piece of ammunition without owning a matching firearm at the exact same time. So you have all the paperwork to go buy a gun together with as much ammo as you have the money for. However being in possession of ammo alone without a matching gun is by law equal to owning an illegal firearm. That's between 2 and 8 years of prison. Insane if you consider that it is fully legal to borrow guns and ammo at a shooting range. Someone can just eject an unused round out and drop it into your bag and by the time you exit the range you will technically be a felon. This even includes the caliber you are eligible to buy if you were to buy the firearm first. You can't even sell the gun alone and keep the ammo until you buy a replacement. In such a case you either buy a replacement first and then sell the first one, or sell the first one together with the ammo and when you buy the second one you buy ammo again.
This absolutely retarded law can be traced back to the 1961 Bill of weapons, ammunition and explosives when all the legal guns were owned by the communist state and only leased to the selected officials.
Niby dlaczego jest to Twoim zdaniem głupie prawo? Tak właściwie to po co komuś amunicja bez broni? Rozumiem podejście, że dla samego faktu, bo czemu niby nie, ale z drugiej strony - jeśli ma się ściśle uregulowaną politykę dostępu do broni, to całkowicie normalne, że starać się ona będzie obejmować jak najszerszy zakres tegoż (naturalnie, nigdy tak naprawdę tego nie osiągnie, bo zawsze znajdzie się „coś jeszcze” np. powiedzmy szara strefa starych broni czarnoprochowych, no ale to inny temat). A z drugiej strony powiedzieć można: załatwi ktoś gdzieś se nielegalnie giwerę, to po co mu ułatwiać zadanie, żeby już miał w zanadrzu naboje kupione. Albo że wykorzysta naboje do konstrukcji jakieś własnej broni. Głupie czy nie - to zależy jak kto patrzy na powszechny dostęp lub nie. Ale czy jakieś dziwne czy szokujące? Nie powiedział bym.
@@GrandePaco. A rozumiesz, że piszę o posiadaczach pozwoleń? Takich co mają w domu promesy i mogą za godzinę wrócić do domu z bronią i amunicją. W tym także sportowców i myśliwych, którzy mogą pożyczyć broń razem z amunicją od kolegi z pozwoleniem.
Tym właśnie ludziom zabrania się kupić choćby jednego naboju, który mogli by wykorzystać w broni klubowej czy w broni kolegi. Tak samo nie wolno im sprzedać broni zostawiając sobie amunicję gdy następna broń ma być w tym samym kalibrze.
Ten przepis ma korzenie w komunistycznej Ustawie z 1961 roku kiedy legalna broń była wyłącznie państwowa. Wydawano broń razem z amunicją, a potem zdawałeś broń razem z amunicją.
Obecnie jest to sztuczna przeszkoda, która legalnym posiadaczom na maksa utrudnia życie, a obchodzi się to kupując i rejestrując najtańszy złom w danym kalibrze. Wtedy w tym kalibrze kupujesz pestki bez limitu.
I have a question for your Q & A ...... Why do you have a poop pillow with sunglasses on your couch 🙂
that question doesn’t need to wait for the Q&A: it belongs to out son 😁
Jestem ciekawa o więcej informacji o Dominikanie
The rest of the world knows it as Dominican Republic. The poor Caribbean place the Americans epolit...
Kolejne niezrozumienie polskiego prawa
Przed podejściem do egzaminu, każdy przyszły kierowca wykonuje szereg badań, których celem jest wykrycie ewentualnych przeciwwskazań do prowadzenia pojazdu. Lekarz, wyspecjalizowany w badaniu kierowców, wskazuje ewentualne wymogi lub ograniczenia wynikające ze stanu zdrowia kierowcy. W przypadku wykrycia wady wzroku, stosowna adnotacja trafi do karty badań przyszłego kierowcy. Taki kandydat będzie zdawał egzamin w zaleconych soczewkach kontaktowych lub okularach (w przypadku ich braku, zdający nie zostanie dopuszczony do egzaminu).
Po zdaniu egzaminu, kierowca otrzyma dokument ze stosowną adnotacją, dotyczącą wymogu noszenia okularów lub soczewek podczas kierowania samochodem. Zapis ten można znaleźć w polu nr 12 prawa jazdy.
Stosuje się następujące oznaczenia:
• 01.01 - dla okularów,
• 01.02 - dla soczewek kontaktowych,
• 01.03 - dla szkieł ochronnych,
• 01.04 - dla szkieł matowych,
• 01.05 - dla przepaski na oko,
• 01.06 - dla okularów lub szkieł kontaktowych.
Rozdzielenie soczewek i okularów zastosowano, ponieważ przy niektórych wadach wzroku nie zaleca się noszenia szkieł kontaktowych.
Low beam, high beam. Krótkie i długie światła.
no, it’s actually called daytime running lights. The ones that are on all the time during the day
Where? In the UK it's called low beam and high beam. There is no requirement to have the headlights on here during the day. I have not heard the term "daytime running lights", which is used differently (I guess) to low beam and high beam, which are more technical terms to distinguish between those two modes of headlights.
@@VigosDad
@@KamilsView I guess the daytime lights is a feature in the new cars, that have such option available. I.e some cars have a led lights that works only during the day, and after sunset they swtich to a normal low beam
Aha. Ok. Dzięki. @@przemyslawkorolczuk
I am over 40 years old now, and I have never driven with a cold elbow, or at 300 km/h
Yes, I own a BMW
What is the sentence
you are therefore forgiven :D
You mentioned drinking in public places. But there is also ATTEMBTED drinking in public.
Attembting here means that you eighter opened or moved drink to your mouth but didn't drink.
The punishment is fine higher than for drinking in public. Ex Dee.
WHAT?! that’s crazy!
The law for the lights is actually all lights not daylight lights. Technically illegal not to have all the lights on but seems that newer cars that come with daylight lights no one cars even the police. I see the police all the time with no taillights. The issue I have is when there is fog or raining people think their lights are on and not so hard to see cars sometimes. The karp from what I read was from the EU. I remember seeing the live carp in the stores but now not so much. The thing is that Poles would leave in the bathtub for a few days to clean them in order to eat. The carp is still killed to sale so not sure what the agenda was here. On the phone in the crosswalk law came out last year or this year. New law. It went in effect with the new law that if you see a pedestrian coming to the crosswalk you have to stop. They do not need to wait to cross the cars must stop if it looks like someone wants to cross. Some of the others I have not heard before. For hands on wheel makes no sense as you need to shift when in the towns.
Czy nagrasz materiał o serialu "1670" i jak go odbierasz?
If Muslims can get DEADLY offended by cartoon in foreign country polish people have full right to be offened at someone mocking their believes in thier own country.
You are completely wrong about the law on insulting religious feelings. First of all, this provision applies to all religions, Judaism, Orthodoxy, Islam, etc., not only Catholicism. The provision literally reads: "Whoever offends the religious feelings of other people by publicly insulting an object of religious worship or a place intended for the public performance of religious rites, shall be subject to a fine, restriction of liberty or imprisonment for up to 2 years" (Article 196 of the Penal Code). A few years ago, there was a case of someone being sentenced under this provision for throwing a pig's head into the mosque, which was considered by the court to be an insult to the religious feelings of Muslims, because pork is considered unclean food in this religion. Questioning the authority of the Church is common in Poland and is not subject to any penalization. The Church does not control anything or anyone and has never sued anyone under the above article. An insult to feelings cannot concern an institution (an institution has no feelings), but only a private person. If criminal proceedings are pending in this respect, it is only on the initiative of a private person who felt offended. Private individuals often misunderstand this provision, which leads to unnecessary criminal proceedings, which are usually won by the accused persons. If such a right exists, people use it, not always wisely. There is nothing to worry about really, if you not intend deliberately hurt someones religious feelings.
Same law with debt of the dead is in Germany...not only polish thing..also DRL is compulsory in new cars sold in EU.
Nie można rozmawiać przez telefon gdy się przechodzi przez pasy bez świateł, na zebrze ze światłami nie ma takiego zakazu.
Doesn't matter if it is a crosswalk with light or no lights. If you are using your phone in a way that signifficantly, limits your awarnes during crossing, that's an offence. You may talk on the phone while crossing if you are looking around you and and not on the screen. Same with the headphones. You must be aware during crossing so if your hearing is impaired by music, your eyes has to be able to monitor your surroundings.
it is related with numerous accidents whre people were not paing attention to whats around them while crossing and they were either walking on "early red", were hit by an abmulance or other vechicles rushing for emergency or just bumping onto other peoples or cars that stopped on the 'zebra' in the traffic. You must remember that pedestrians while crossing the street are also obligated to the same laws as drivers- they are not "holy cows" so they must obey the same principles as the other users of the roads- limited trust, awarnes and safety percoutios adjusted to the circumstances and weather conditions. After all even if you had all the rights while crossing, you will tell that to the mortitian while they will be preparing you for the funeral after being unalived by the car that hit you.
Stay safe
Oczywiście jest zakazane w obu przypadkach:
PoRD art. 14 Zabrania sie:
...
8) korzystania z telefonu lub innego urządzenia elektronicznego podczas wchodzenia lub przechodzenia przez jezdnię, drogę dla rowerów lub
torowisko, w tym również podczas wchodzenia lub przechodzenia przez przejście dla pieszych - w sposób, który prowadzi do ograniczenia
możliwości obserwacji sytuacji na jezdni, drodze dla rowerów, torowisku lub przejściu dla pieszych.
We Wrocławiu jest od 2018 dozwolone picie piwa na wyspie słodowej,we wszystkich dużych parkach oraz w lasach.
Some stuff i didnt know as well as an adult Pole 😃
Where have you two met? Just found your channel today. :D
You can drink by the Wisła river on the left side of it publicly
Zimny łokieć :) I have not heard that one since 1997 :)
Jaywalking isn't a thing in the UK either
Możesz rozmawiać przez telefon przechodząc przez przejście, nie możesz np. patrzeć w telefon.
Jeśli chodzi o soczewki i jazdę... O ile się dobrze orientuję, to na prawie jazdy pod "12" powinien być wpisany odpowiedni kod. Okulary mają 1.02, a soczewki chyba 1.06. W tym przypadku ma to sens jeśli chodzi o wykroczenie(?), bo ma się stwierdzoną wadę wzroku i luźno można stwierdzić, że ktoś np prowadzi, a nie widzi za dobrze. Dany kod będzie upoważniał do jazdy w wymaganych do tego okularach/soczewkach. Poprawcie mnie jeśli się mylę, bo sama żadnej wady wzorku nie mam, więc też takiego wpisu na moim prawku brak.
Inaczej - jeśli masz ograniczenie na okulary (01.01) a pojedziesz w soczewkach, to zgodnie z aktualnymi przepisami odpowiadasz tak samo, jakbyś prawka nie miał. Najlepiej w takim przypadku mieć kod 01 (bez drugiej części) albo 01.06, które pozwala na jazdę w okularach lub soczewkach. W przeciwnym wypadku masz 1500 zł mandatu za jazdę bez uprawnień
Świetny odcinek - zapraszamy do nas! :)
İst Vigos Mama Friseurin?
haha, nein, ich bin copywriterin 😂
@@Immigrantwriter Weil dein Mann Salon gesagt hat. Dachte ich Friseur Salon🤣🤣. Besser gesagt die Übersetzung auf deutsch war so 😂
@@gokcekoc7258 er weisst nicht was er sagt 50% Zeit hahaha
@@Immigrantwriter Hahahaha🤣🤣 ihr seid so ein süßes Ehepaar ❤️. İhr habt zwar nicht gefragt aber ich sage es trotzdem, ich bin eine Türkin und bin geboren und aufgewachsen hier in Deutschland. Ich liebe es genauso die verschiedenen Kulturen zu beobachten und mir Gedanken zu machen warum das so ist
@@gokcekoc7258 Geil! Danke fur deine Kommentar
Fragment o dziedziczeniu długów jest zdecydowanie dezinformujący, pomija instytucję dziedziczenia z dobrodziejstwem inwentarza.
Dla mnie słabe i płytkie
3:08 - the logic is you inherit the whole estate. You either take upon all the deeds of your ancestor, both the prizes they earned through their life as well as punishments, or you denounce it. When you get in debt, the debtors are the first in line for the money of your estate, not your inheritors. That is cause you made a lawful contract with the lenders. Children have right to fruits of your life, but if you spoiled those fruits, it's your fault not lenders. This way people with deadly illnesses cannot just borrow absurd amounts and then die enriching their kids with someone's else money, but still can get into debt if they need for whatever reason. So it's actually a perfect solution. Well... except that you can inherit a hidden debt in some circumstances, but that's a quirk that can be worked out.
3:25 - the justification is that it's easier to distinguish cars in motion with cars parked alongside the road that way. Usefull in cities, but yeah, maybe it shouldn't be a law? It's quite new.
1:55 - I think this law is treated differently in Poland than in lot of countries. Like you said, in Latin America it is seen as unnecessary law, so it isn't a law. In western Europe it is an actual law. You won't ever see a German jaywalking unless he is running for his life. In Poland everyone agrees it should be a law... and that it should be broken on will. "Law" in Poland isn't actually that respected of a concept. It's like playing Munchkin - rules are only there to punish you if you get caught. Jaywalking is seen as a non-issue, cause if you paid enough attention to not get caught while doing it - you are doing it safely, while if you get caught - you clearly weren't paying attention and deserve to be punished. People live here by their morality, not "the Law". Law is what it is cause of history and that's the best we can do. Doesn't mean we will like it or follow it. Similarly treated are drugs or speeding and many more victimless crimes.
I had similar thought about this
I wanna know the strangest law of all time!!! 🤗
You can marry a 6 years old girl. This is not event strange but completely disgusting.