Exploring Religion - What is Mysticism?: An Afternoon with Dr. Bernard McGinn | Library at Home
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 12. 2020
- Join distinguished historian Dr. Bernard McGinn as he delivers the Chair of Christian Thought Swanson Lecture on Christian Spirituality. McGinn considers the meaning of mysticism, a word that for many indicates something bizarre, uncanny, peculiar. He argues that mysticism means an ever deepening awareness of God’s presence in everyday life.
This presentation is part of our “Exploring Religion” on-demand programming, where experts discuss the meaning, history, and extent to which religion informs our culture.
Explore more of these topics and Library Events online: bit.ly/2EOyYqb
Want to see more videos from the Calgary Public Library? Subscribe to our channel: bit.ly/2GcCJq8
Lecture begins at 6:53
Lol
I am a mystic, that is one that has engaged in and knows God in direct personal and intimate relationship. Dr. McGinn's presentation is an intellectual presentation based on his thinking. If you want to read one's presentation or study the same - good presentation. If you want to know God beyond our finite intellect and limited rational mind, then you must turn DIRECTLY to him opening yourself to God in your spirit/heart NOT your mind. God is real and longs for you and all mankind to know him personally and intimately.
I liked the characterization of mysticism as the "attentive gaze upon the highest principle"
Thank you so much Professor McGinn . Also I read and reread your book on Erchart. Just beautiful.
One of christianism with the777 the holy 😍 catholic universal church...
Mysticism is the art of union with reality- Past thought to the pure apprehension of Truth. According to Evelyn Underhill. Mysticism is: Artists that work with human life. The want to heal the disharmony.. understanding of transformation needed in this life to leave the knowledge to find the wisdom. Human need to control needs to cease. Trust in mysticism, the spiritual self. The reality of source. Thank you
Love a Underhill reference
Glad you gave Evelyn Underhill a mention. 🙏
Outstanding! Thank you!
Living as we do, there are forces mounting beyond the horizon. Prepare for a hero's journey. The quest is enormous. Follow me to the depths. I will lead you to an awakening. The Mystic Eye will guide us. I am waiting to listen to your subliminal message.
A low point for the public image of mysticism in the UK was when Mystic Meg used to try ( always incorrectly) to predict the National Lottery numbers on the BBC ! Mysticism has ( in my humble opinion ) been given a rational and scientific basis by the Idealist Bernard Kastrup ( PhD PhD) . I regard him as the Galileo of Consciousness .✝️🕉️
신비주의 사상에 대해서 눈을 뜨게 해주셔서 고맙습니다. 버나드 맥긴 교수님.
Thank you
A mystic is not irrational; she is trans-rational. Mystical intuition shines brightly in the depths of human experience where rational thinking is denied access. Can a lover rationally understand and describe the blissful union with his beloved? Can a mother rationally understand and describe the joy of caressing her newborn?
The Mystic of the 21st Century will be dissimilar from all previous Mystics.
Musticism is the direct awareness of God.
Or a specific god
Blessings ❤️ from Sindh Pakistan
It's easy to see as something "paranormal" and "elite", easy to dismiss as irrational "magical" thinking, relatively rare and seemingly paranormal experiences are unsurprisingly good catalysts for contemplative thought. And unsurprisingly mistrusted in the modern age of literary definitions and diagnostic tools that can more easily "demystify" the catalyst (the cause), but i would argue means very little to the effect itself (which isn't immune from being irrational nonsense, but isn't obligated to be so by proxy either).
John the ✝️...Joel goldsmith. The mystical 👁...Miranda brewer is inspired by this crazy 🤪friend who is this situation with 804.691.8393 and is inspired me too with the tartan McCracken of the Irish Klang with Bill Yates and ross
"the christian of the future will either be a mystic or will not be a christian at all." there are no christians then. this may be a redundant rhetorical question, since this is your scholarly work, but mysticism explored through the lens of christianity, given how institutionalized and rationalized it is, how part and parcel it is of the ruling order it undeniably is (its relation to other power structures and its role in perpetuating them), you even describe institutionalization and intellectualism as integral parts of its making, how then can this understanding safeguard a true exploration of mysticism? asserting that christian institutions stand at an equal footing with mystical experience is why christianity is not only at odds with religious mysticism, it is an active enemy of it and there is no way to salvage it.
I can't get that name right - is Van Hugo or what? - googling leads nowhere. And the books by Julian Laerch, Julien Larach, Julian Larch - please help with these names.
Friedrich von Hügel (1852 - 1925)
Julian of Norwich (1343 - c1416). She was an 'Anchoress' who lived at St. Julian's church in Norwich in the East of England. Nobody knows her name and so she is simply known as 'Julian of Norwich'. Her famous work is 'Revelations of Divine love). I recommend the Penguin Classics version from 1998 translated by Elizabeth Spearing
@@fraserreich9452 Thanks.
Christism is the only way to work with meeting the trinityof 777
If one hasn't met God face-to-face = had the Personal Interview with Christ Almighty = been inducted by Transfiguration back into the Heavens as a god, I'd think everything less is MORTAL BLATHER.
Reading the books of the New Testament, we probably asked ourselves more than once: *"Why 2000 years we do not see those miracles that accompanied the Сhurch of Christ in the I century, as described in the New Testament?"* Why do the so-called preachers of Christ have to prove that Jesus really existed and atheists boldly deny the historicity or divine origin of Christ? Maybe because the Сhurch of Christ has not existed for 2000 years?
The Сhurch does not exist in the form in which it is presented in the books of the New Testament, but there are Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant and other christian sects claiming to be the place of the Church, but they not have the only thing that distinguishes the divine from the human and is characteristic of just the Сhurch of Christ -the reinforcement of the word with signs, that is, miracles (Mark 16:15-20). Therefore, some researchers doubt the historicity of Christ, and some of them are not opposed to declaring him a an ordinary philosopher, teacher. But even if Jesus were an ordinary philosopher, his disciples would be ordinary followers of Jesus. And they would not dare to write about the miracles that not only Jesus, but also his disciples, could perform. In this world, the great fertility of atheism can be explained by the fact that there is no main opponent of critics of the Bible - the Church. If there were the Church in our time as described by the authors of the New Testament books, where miracles are performed, the sick are healed, where prophesied, and the dead are raised, no one would doubt the historicity of Christ. Then there would be the same controversy throughout the world as in the first century - Jesus the Son of God or the false prophet who seduces the world by miracles. As a result, we can say that the emergence and development of christian sects and atheism was the result of the fact that over the 2000 years the Сhurch of Christ did not exist.
Find *"The Mystery about the Church of Christ"* video on CZcams. The video reveals the prophecy of the disappearance and reappearance of the Church of Christ before the End of the World. Watching this video will give hope to all who sincerely seek God and will interest those who are not too lazy to think freely. Click on my name to watch the video (The video is in Russian, but English subtitles are included).
🕊🌎🕊🕊sharing🫂thankYOU
This should really be titled something like "Mysticism and Christianity" or "What is Christian Mysticism?" as it focuses on mysticism solely from a Christian subject, which I was very disappointed by. Given the tremendous diversity and complexity of mysticism, it seems a disservice to only give attention to one tradition's interpretation of it.
Contemplation (meditation) is not Mysticism. It is an activity. Perhaps in the service of Mysticism practice. This came at the beginning of this talk. and was only one of many suspect statements. I am disappointed.
Contemplation is not meditation; contemplation is a higher act than meditation. Further, contemplation is the object of mysticism, yes, but only considered from the sense where contemplation is an act and mysticism a school. Bernard's overall thought, however, is that mysticism truly is contemplation and contemplation is truly mysticism--that they are intrinsically linked: where you have a mystic, you have a contemplative; where you have a contemplative, you have a mystic.
@@curtis6919 Contemplation is not the object of Mysticism. The object of Mysticism is the union of or with the Divine (however you choose to define that). It is an experiential objective. Contemplation or complaintive prayer (Fr Keating readings are excellent) is something we do to attain these. It is not more (or less) then Meditation. There are plenty of mystics in the Asian traditions where meditation practice is more prevalent. I do agree with your last statement. A Mystic is generally going to be Contemplative. And a Contemplative is on their way, if they are not already there.
@@TaishiArts contemplation *is* union with the divine; St. Thomas writes on this saying that contemplation is the act of being with the divine and that all the Saints are contemplating