Monster Out of Place Weapons Spotted in Ukraine
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
- Tanks, like aircraft, have their own indelible moments in military history that captivate and inspire. Our Ultimate Tank Compilation brings together four unforgettable chapters of armored warfare, all currently unfolding on the Ukrainian frontlines.
In the spring of 2022, as Ukraine’s tank reserves were depleted by relentless attacks, the T-84 Oplot made a dramatic comeback. After two decades of waiting, this formidable machine emerged from obscurity, its impenetrable armor and advanced systems transforming it into a crucial force in Ukraine's desperate fight against overwhelming odds.
As Operation Desert Storm raged on, the French AMX-10 RC, initially designed for reconnaissance, faced its own trial by fire. Speeding across the desert at over 80 kilometers per hour, these armored vehicles unleashed their firepower with precision, obliterating enemy forces without a single scratch. Now, these legendary tanks have been spotted once again on the frontlines of Ukraine, continuing their storied legacy.
The British Challenger 2, a pinnacle of military engineering with its powerful 120-millimeter gun, found itself in an unexpected dilemma in Ukraine during late summer 2023. Amidst the chaos of battle, a hidden mine immobilized this renowned tank, putting its impressive record and the skills of its Ukrainian operators to the ultimate test.
Meanwhile, the Polish PT-91 Twardy, an upgraded version of the Soviet T-72, stands as a testament to Poland’s resilience and ingenuity. Developed during the final days of the USSR, this advanced tank now faces the remnants of the regime it was designed to confront, highlighting the ironies of modern warfare.
Ukrainian tech tree is going to be WILD.
Most of their Tech comes from the United States of old 2000 equipment
@@jacoblongbrake8230 Sure. Just keep coming.
@@jacoblongbrake8230 nope thats wrong ukraine made russain tanks for army there tech was there own
@@bitsnbobs1969 I guess we're all wrong today
@@jacoblongbrake8230 look black sea fleet it was there drone boats that sank them and missle that sank that Moskva they have there own tech for sure
The important thing about challenger2 isn't it's resilience, but the fact there's a VERY good chance that the crew will walk away!
Yes, but if it is killed in the first few minutes of the fight it has no value at all. Why use a tank, just to be another wreck on the field. And yea they didn't pay for it so they don't care if it gets destroyed. They constantly demand weapons as if we are obligated to supply them with weapons.
@nitholav5583 yes but since they are much better than the soviet models they are kept in reserve often, and not thrown to the dogs like your suggesting
@@topcatom "Much better" LOL Until the first rain. Then they become monuments of stupidity...
@@nitholav5583 enemy reveals their positions.
@@doublehelix7880how’s that T72 space program going?
If the Crew survives, the Tank has succeeded 👍
What crew? There's only 6 of Ukraine's most advanced tanks, the t-84.
@@remingtonkinney625 shut up orc
@@remingtonkinney625 STFU orc: The T84- was designed in 1975-1994. Thats advanced only in Russia and only for absolutely ignorant fucknozzles..
@@zerotheliger is that the best you got? Let's have a draft in the order of the number of pro Ukraine comments left online. That way you can be with your beloved Ukrainians in the trenches instead of saying here slav have a shovel and do my dirty work for me.
wel well well...........they are not succesfull in ukraine lol
Again & again. Necessity is the mother of invention. It's a miracle that Ukrainian logistics can supply the hodgepodge of equipment.
Many of them actually get shipped back out, in Poland there's a new base even near the border to help repair the vehicles.
Don't you mean it's a miracle of western resources and logistics that they can supply the vast hotch pocth array of equipment and munitions that they need
I was a track mechanic, and I can say going 45 mph in a tank is kind of hairy.
drove the 109 a few times, that thing always sounded like it would blow up going 10 mph, in contrast the m1 abrams drove like a car.
objectively they look like mobile phallus idol's. in 200 years they will look at the still operational t-62's with wonder and disbelief that it was ever brought to fruition
Got a Bradley to 47MPH on MSR Mobile, Ramadi Iraq. It handled it but there was so much noise from the tracks at that speed our internal crew communications were completely non existent.
@@COMANCHE3 god the speed and forces of that poor track flying around must have been amazing.
@@HandFromCoffin yes the driver of the Bradley behind me said several rubber track pads flew off
The AMX-10RC is perfectly suited to the WWII era tank destroyer role. It seems like it's a relevant concept once again.
it's literally useless on the battlefield, the troops hate it so much
@@bryf2787 it's definitely not a tank and they'll have a lot of problems if they try to use it like one, but for heavy scout work they're good.
@@bryf2787 Also, after a little digging, the only complaints for it mostly come from using it like a tank, although the gun stabilization system isn't that great. From what I understand the entire vehicle's suspension is used for gun stabilization. HOWEVER, when they use it properly as fire support (Like the stryker MGS) or in a heavy armed scout role, they perform quite well. The other main issue is the gearbox, which is prone to failure when abused. Outside that, it's operational history is pretty decent. It's no Bradley, but it's a useful system when employed correctly. It makes a terrible tank, but then again an AC-130 makes a terrible air superiority platform.
@@Canthus13 heavy scouting doesn't work on the Ukrainian battlefield. Drones are the way now.
@@Canthus13 yes it is still useful as a gun platform, but not much else.
Production of Challenger 2 tanks ended in 2002, with close to 440 vehicles produced. Extremely effective as a demolition round and in anti-personnel roles.
The Ukrainian's are having luck with the Bradley's. They attack T-90s in teams of two and use their 25MMs to shoot all of the optic, countermeasure and everything else off the top of the tank, blinding it. Then they hit it hard with either armor piercing 25MM until they penetrate something vital or TOW. All this while the Bradley's use their maneuverability to scoot around from cover to cover. There is drone video of one of the battles.
💯Facts.... The Bradley's use their cannons to get the mobility kill by damaging all the tank sensors and optics then send a cheap drone to finish it off
how many times did this happen actually? I've seen that one drone video, it was very cool.. however your post suggests this is a regular tactic used daily
Hmm I’ve seen close to a hundred Bradley’s getting wrecked but one video of a t90 getting disabled by Bradley and multiple drones, are you sure what your saying isn’t bullcrap?
they did that like once or twice lol... and one was a complete panic when both of them accidentally stumbled upon each other... also the main gun of the Bradley is incapable of penetrating the T-90's armor so no... they cannot kill it but they can incapacitate and force them to retreat by knocking out the external sensors.
Wrong: its not luck, its training.
No one is showing the top notched inflatable t72s😂😂
Loved the comprehensive look at armored vehicles being used by the Ukraine. Very interesting information.
Tank vs tank is very rare in the Ukrainian war, if it is used for infantry attack or artillery, the old one is also suitable. Even the most modern ones burn well because of the drones.
Texan here... Slava Ukraine!!!
I didn’t think a Taxan would be a NAZI sympathiser deskusting remember CRIST IS KING. I thought you were the good guys guess not
Ukrainian here go Russia 🇷🇺
@@boris2997 thank god for people like you ❤️
Slava Ukraine!!! Indeed brother Florida checking in 😂😅
@@markkrzan2236 you do know that you support NAZIS. Haven’t you family that was in world war 2. If you du they are ashamed of you, turning in their graves
Hit a mine and was immobilised... Not destroyed... it took upto 10 hits from various AT weapons to actually make it unusable. It was NOT destroyed.
Sure buddy you cope what ever way you need
Only 5 left of Ukraine's most advanced domestic tank, the t-84.
@@remingtonkinney625 At least it works, the Russian "super tank" is a failure!
@@williamjackson5942 what do you mean? Russia has a lot of working t-80s, and t-84 is just a modified Russian tank except there's a far smaller military budget in Ukraine.
@@williamjackson5942 Russian t-80s modified to today's standards nonetheless.
The formidable force of 5 tanks that are going to win the war... If ever...
They went to Desna training ground, before being called up in "support roles" within the current conflict.
They will however make for a nice exhibition at the Kubinka tank museum.
@@skitidet4302not in a million years years😂
@@steamedham5412 They already have the Abrams, I think they towed back 2 of them actually. They also have plenty of leopard 2s to chose from. The challenger 2 that they knocked out last year has not been salvaged as far as I know, but I guess they can eventually pick up whatever remains of it, though I'm thinking they are trying to get a more intact example. What's left? The T-84? That thing is like a ghost, I'm not sure it even exists, so catching that one might be hard. What's number 5? I forgot.
@@skitidet4302 Ukraine has more than one of every Russian tank ever lmfao, and the T-84 saw more service than the T-14
If that tank uses machine guns for air defense, it effectively has no air defense. Those for anti light vehicles (.50") and personal (7.68mm), not air defense.
Exactly!
Well on our leopard one the top machine gun was mounted on an ack ack mount . It made us feel better lol
In ww2 is was for air defense,these days its more infantry support and drones
The Avenger uses a M3 .50 in conjunction with its stingers for close air defense. I know that's an old system but I could see CROWS being upgraded to antidrone warfare with just some aim bot and fowl shot
It's a 12.7x108mm round, slight longer & heavier then a .50 bmg. Wikipedia describes it as an "anti aircraft machine gun" for some reason, I think that's where he got it from.
In ww2 it could have been used to defend the crew against attacking aircraft but not as a traditional anti air defense weapon. Its technically an anti material round that is able to be elevated upwards high enough to shoot at low flying aircraft.
anti air defense for the crew in emergencies
🏆🤗🙏💪🎖️
Thank you for sharing this
The French love their variable suspension, like the old Citroens.
Long-range firepower of the Challenger.
The Ukrainian Bradley operators, when up against a ruzzian T90, knew what to do.
A "Diamond Beast", a sniper weapon, but not infallible.
Battle action is how research is done.
The problem with T-84 Oplat, only a small number have been produced even smaller than the number of Russia's T-14 Armata.
4 were sold, 1 spare parts and an engineering platform. Five operational tanks transferred to Desna training center, until called up in an official supporting role, in the ongoing conflict.
It's "Oplot" and its meaning is somewhere between "Protector" and "Foundation", in a way that a father is.
But unlike the T-14, the T-84 actually works. Unlike the T-14 the T-84 Oplat also has not be canceled. Yes it was announced earlier this year that no further T-14s will ever be produced, and they were pulled from Front Line Service. Despite never serving on the front line. Russian Military knows the T-14 was a bad tank. They never used it in anger, never deployed it to the front line, and still it got canceled.
@Alte.Kameraden it's like they designed the whole tank around a junk engine or something. Not to mention the crap optics.... and auto loader that isn't field serviceable....
@@andrewl9169 honestly that's not even the worst of it. A 12.7mm heavy MG can disable the turret. Basically if it gets anywhere near entrenched infantry or dares to go into an urband fight anything and I mean anything bigger than an infantry rifle can cripple it's ability to fight back forcing it to retreat.. turret armor barely exist. Basically making it a worse platform personally than the American Stryker but at an insane MBT price tag.
Any vehicle with a 20mm+ gun will make it combat ineffective almost immediately. As well.
So..
1. Any MBT in service can knock it out at range.
2. Almost any IFV can knock it out at range or mid range or at the very least cripple it more efficiently than vs a T72-T90.
3. Infantry will have little issues crippling it at close ranges.
It's a huge waste of resources in short with little if any usefulness vs what Russia is already fielding. Just about the only pro would be crew survivability would be higher than most current Russian tanks. That is only if the front armor works as they say it does. Though I'm pretty sure an ATGM will still wipe the crew being the turret is so small that all the force will likely go through the top into the crew compartment and all the crew are in the same tiny space.
The ACR is a tank hunter in the classic style of a Hellcat. Fast light and well armed. You engage from a nice hull down position and then run like hell
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 ❤😊 !
You need to screen your stock footage better. Multiple instances of the wrong type of vehicle being shown and training footage (sometimes of other militaries) inserted when speaking of actual combat operations.
If you're looking for historical accuracy and impeccable attention to detail the tank museum is that way >.
If only Russia studied history, maybe their losses wouldn’t be WW2 levels of sad. They spent 30 years developing the SU-34, only to lose dozens because they rather use rocket and cannon fire instead of the stand-off missiles they claim to have success with. Then you had the embarrassment with the convoy running out of gas and losing 300 guys to take a airport only to lose it hours later. Definitely a “lol what a scrub” moment for the books.
Thank you for the longer video 👏🏽
I love tanks.
T84 was a true advance of a tank wow
I've been waiting for the mammoth tank from Command Conquer to come out in this war.
The words friendly fires means normally the Americans.
7.62 Anti aircraft gun huh? lol
Infantry support and drones
I red somewhere that the Ukrainians said that the AMX-10 was useless, as soon as any kind of explosive was used near it, the shrapnel would shred the tires and the vehicle was stranded. It was just too fragile to go toe to toe with any tank because of the tires.
yeah it is uselss
I can understand why they would think its useless, and it was honestly probably not a good idea to give them any of them. The AMX-10 is an incredibly specialized vehicle, when used correctly in that specific role it will excel. But Ukraine doesn't have the luxury to mold it's army around such an odd vehicle, nor does it have the luxury of having a general with experience to make use of them in their intended role.
France should have swapped the AMX-10's with another country, who in turn could have sent Ukraine more old soviet tanks or US Bradley's.
It's just unfortunate for everyone involved, but especially for the AMX concept as they really are good vehicles when used appropriately. Though admittedly the advent of drones may have changed that equation.
@@Agiantpansy 100% wrong place to send the AMX-10s to. They should have sent them to ex-colonies that they want to back in Africa.
Wow so glad thewe updated the 84 oplat there nice eeeee there was more advance then the t64 and 72 tanks already
The oplot hasn't even seen combat in Ukraine in any serious way
A 2,000 dollar drone vs a 10 million dollar tank....not a fair fight. Russians might as well go back to horse cavalry troops in plate armour, with lances battle axes, and swords.
Amx are nasty also
Gatling shotgun ? Putting up a lead wall at say 50 meters may work.😊
Thats ukraines own countries tank it looks like a BEAST
A two hundred dollar drone destroys it
The AMX-10 RC, the RC stands for "Roues-Canon", meaning "wheeled gun", isn't really even a tank and its vulnerable to heavy anti-tank weaponry, putting them against heavy tanks, as smart as an ashtray on a motorbike. The lack of a stabilizer for the main 105mm gun affects its accuracy, especially when firing on the move together with gearbox problems plague these odd balls.
If you look at the Tank Destroyers back in WWII most of the engagements they TD would come to stop to shoot. So yeah, AMX-10 RC used as Tank Destroyer is viable concept.
It is vulnerable to even 0.50 cal
The French RC appears to try to satisfy a role between artillery and a tank. Those are just my first impressions, based on appearance and functionality and all that good stuff. I could be wildly incorrect.
SLAVA UKRAINI!!!!!!!
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
What is glass armor? I can’t find it anywhere online?
That's not UKRAINE most of the pics are UK and Germany training areas
Love the content
Video has weird thumping noise in background.
called music.... i know its a new crazy thing..
@@MRsolidcolor😂👍🏾😂
👀 might be the weed ya smoking. It any good?
Russia must be defeated first, but I think the Ukrainian defence industry will become closely involved in allied development programs.
RFE: is it difficult / time consuming to add YT's "internal anchors" as part of Description? Your video here covers so many substantial topics!
@CivtechDev
Just another T-64
Slava Ukraini! 🇺🇦✊🇬🇧🏴
Heroyam Slava! 🇺🇸💙💛🇺🇦
I liked the focus blur effect center that went through pictures but it panned the same way with that same effect was maybe a bit much
Challenger 3 is an upgrade programme to existing tanks, not a replacement vehicle.
Same idea as the US Tank Destroyers. Light, moble, big gun.
i wanna see a hellcat engine in the amx-10
Slava Ukraini!!!
That Dolly Parton refences
No one can complain about the AMX-10 Being called a light tank when the Russians refer to the MI-24 Hind as a Flying tank
I’m SURPRISED w all of ukraines cleverness they haven’t thought of a way to battle fpv drones! Hey @ukraine here’s an idea free of charge! Convert a t-shirt cannon into a net cannon and vio-la your welcome;) cheap, amusing, more importantly it’s EFFECTIVE!
KV-2
Y'all really just put that iron cross on the tank in the middle of the frame.
I have a question. What alloy of steel was used in T34 main gun 76.2 mm?
Lets be honest, immobilize and attack from above has been the preferred way to take out a tank since WW2, it's not like Russia revolutionized anti tank warfare or anything.
0:15 A tank so advanced, its CITV blocks remote controlled weapons station MG 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I was out as soon as i heard " IMPENETRABLE ARMOR"...This person has no clue of war. Anything that is made can be broken, and destroyed. Such bullsh!t pomp from narrators who have never seen a bullet, let alone a tank
Soviet tank design vs Soviet tank design. Who will win?!
The west 🤣🤣🤣
No winners in that fight
How is this Ukrainian tank doing after 2 years of war?
Challenger 2, And it's got a kettle😂
3:19 that isn’t a Ukrainian vehicle, it’s an American one. I’m very intimate with which one that is. With the center roof mounted maintenance door it also narrows down which variant it is, one of the newest to its platform.
The UK should have upgraded the Saracen/Saladin type of vehicle.
❤😊❤😊❤😊❤😊❤
27:48, this is wrong. The Russians confirmed that the challenger was hit and immbolized by a lancet drone, not a mine. It was then finished off by an artillery shot with FPV drone coordination.
The one thing i appreciate is that this war thought all the propagandists and keyboard warrior that their favorite tanks arent invincible or much better than the others
I hope you know when the Abrams was designed.
A 7.62 anti-aircraft gun???
How about a C E V ? or A V L B ? Combat engineer vehicle, and armored vehicle launched bridge !!!
Why clickbait? you are better then that Dark Tech. Thumbnail pic shenanigans should be left for the loser channels.
He is the owner not you
Stop killing each other!!! We’re brothers and sisters !
At 0’34” that’s a German Army Tank judging by the markings on the body!
If they're saying there's a Ukrainian tank there should be a Taiwan tank
"Auxiliary power unit" ?
A generator basically. Means you can run internal and external systems without the main engine burning lots of fuel
@@utbdoug THAT, mon ami, bears looking into. 💋
ah yes, the Twardy's expensive reactive armor
Tanks are built to be destroyed. Just what it takes to destroy is the difference between tanks.
I’m sorry but really!?! A McFarty tank with a Dolly Parton configuration and the driver’s passive night Radonka sight not to be confused with the passive Badonkadonk sight
I love these big old girls
Fk the EBR. Damn little hot wheels piss me off in World of Tanks.
There kormarnt anti tank missile is the same as our JAVELIN huh
Russian Tanks have rubber not explosive or reactive armor just rubber
“Dolly Parton configuration” (36:50). What would that be?
Two large lumps on the front end. 😂
Yet another mouthpiece?
Former Mother Land? Former masters, you mean.
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics is like EU , Ukraine Soviet Socialist Republic they had won elections like Primier (President) head of the whole USSR that are Ukrainians so sometimes they are the masters. they had their own leader and like 4 votes on decision making on USSR out of 30+ smalller republics had only 1 or 2 votes. It was the Agricultural Capital, Propaganda Capital and Nuclear Capital of the USSR. They just gave up 1,700+ nukes in exchange for lands, tanks ,S300s and other stuff. Lugansk and Donbas also also help the USSR fight Poland and Ukraine.
@@ansonang7810
The USSR was like the EU?
As soon as the wall came down everyone tried to get as far away from that monster as they could. They wanted to join NATO as fast as they could, so they could stay away. Wars were fought to get away.
That wall that finally came down, was celebrated by everyone. They had built a wall around an entire city & nation. The USSR had created the largest prison in the history of the world. That, and communication with the other "Warsa Pact" slave states was blocked. It was called "The Iron Curtain".
Like the EU?! 😆😂🤣
What have you been smoking?😆😂🤣
@@ansonang7810
🙈🙉🙊GoogleCZcams👶REmôvéd my reply. A terrible monopoly. I violated "NO" YT guidelines. Good luck with your replies friends🖖🤞👍
@@ansonang7810
Slimy UT,removes my replies. Good luck🤞
@@richardwarner3705 may be because of the language used , or it's a fake news? That's why your reply is blocked, or censored.
France ha long made wheeled tanks. Tracks are not a must to be considered a tank
All tanks are vulnerable so correct tactics with a combination of networked forces within the battle space and active defence is mandatory now for modern western tanks.
If Russia came up against the modern western NATO forces they would be up against a combined force with NATO air forces gaining air superiority.
Ukraine receives 2nd rate limited sophisticated equipment and with limited network centric and still found the Russian wanting.
NATO would crush the shitty equipped and trained Russian forces if they took them on.
Poor sound . Voice is too fast.
Russia didn't reconcentrate it battalion, it converted them back to brigade, it was way too expensive to maintain a support unit for every battalion, by restructuring back to brigade, it gave the commander more manpower and tactical front to work with, allowing a greater concentration of force and allow the support unit to be directed to where the commander needed them the most. the battalion level battle command was orginally created with the expectation of fighting a nuclear war, in which dividing your forces to the smallest possible unit make sense to survive the fallout. however in a convention war, battalion are simply too small to offer much tactical wide, convention war has a wider front and require more manpower and firepower to break the enemy line. it seem most army in the world has resettle on brigade as the main combat unit...
CH2 Best motherufcking Tank in the World say Hello Russia!
No one wants to believe Prophecy.
description box
What is the ongoing defense strategy? Advancing backwards while taking severe attrition?
Desde Sevilla España ,11👈🇪🇸⚔️ases buenos vidios
Dude, you really need to research topics more before making videos. ERA (or explosive reactive armor) is not used for its resistance to AP (armor piercing) rounds. It's benefit against those is limited to just adding a few mm of additional armor the kinetic penetrator has to get through. ERA is for increased protections against explosive penetrator (shaped charged projectiles, missles, etc...). I'm sure you made other errors simple research would have solved, but I quit paying attention after this. If I can't trust you to get the simple stuff right, how can I trust you get other details right. Especially when over half of your B roll wasn't even video of the T-84 Oplat.
The whole point of kontakt 5 is resistance against AP rounds as kontakt 1 was already effective against HEAT🤦♂️
So much of this video is pure nonsense, from the clickbait thumbnail to the completely wrong segment of ERA... Do better
Too much noise... bye !
The battle tank is all but dead