I think the one of the best parts about this car is that you can actually use it everyday, with its double-trunk space and PDK, plus the balanced suspension.
that would cannibalize the 911, that why Porsche refuse to put power in it near the 911 hierarchy because they know this is a much superior chassis layout etc, and better looking to most.
The only reason the Cayman doesn't have a bigger engine is because Porsche want a middle-of-the-road Porsche. They have the Boxter, the Cayman and the 911 (modern) of the sports cars. You could theoretically put the heaviest 911 engine into the Cayman, but then it would be better. The Cayman isn't supposed to be better.
I love driving the Cayman S, my buddy has one that he lets me drive. A most generous man. Poise and enthusiasm are my best description of these cars. But no air con and no radio/sound system, what a downer for the R. Especially for Australian conditions, no air is one thing but our roads eat lightweight rims for snacks. Porsche must be commended on going mid engine. Future Carreras will be thus.
@gurvir44 fantastic car i'm a big audi fan myself especially there motorsport division, 24th april lemans 24h test race :D fantastic. looking to buy an A1 built from the chassis of a vw polo, 1.4l 185bhp and dual clutch gearbox, if your from the states then i dont think its out coming to the USA not yet anyway. what engine did you go for?
@itsdastuff So you want/ need traction control in your sports car? Every time I get in the Caymen S (without the lsd) I turn off the PASM. I'd rather control it myself personally especially on track/ autox.
It's not just that. Its got a bit more power, a different tune, different cam. Also the suspension is different, and the wheels are the lightest wheels any porsche has on them. I don't think anyone would really buy this though, unless they were a purist and either collected cars, or actually raced them on the track.
Im picking up my Cayman R tomorrow. Test drove it and certainly is the best handling car iv driven. Never driven a 911 or a cayman s but i dont need to as i dont want one. In time when i can afford the next step up ill go for a 997 911 gt3. but they are silly money and i doubt they will depreciate anymore. Dont see why ppl keep comparing the Cayman and 911, they are different cars, aimed at ppl who want different things. Ones mid engine ones rear. one has 2 seats the other has 4. one has rear wheel drive and the other can come in 4 wheel drive soft top, targa and coupe, turbo. So many differences but ppl still think they can be compared.
No mention of brakes at all? I am thinking of moving to a Carrera GTS in the spring or perhaps another Cayman S but with the ceramic brakes, pasm and the usual sport options. Not too sure about those ceramic brakes however. My primary concern is that the cost versus the benefit just is not there. The standard brakes seem to be up to the task very well and are fairly cheap to swap out pads and rotors. The ceramics are offensive in cost for maybe 10% better performance. It is a tough call.
@subestimado You're absolutely right. We have 911 (aspirated) GT3 RS MKII and 911 (not-aspirated) GT2 RS, which are also "track cars" like these you said: Boxter Spyder and Cayman R. They're all great and they value what you pay, but I still prefer a Boxter Spyder, don't you? PS: "I don't know if the Cayman is better, it's just a Boxster with a roof", Jeremy Clarkson.
@MikeW259 I like your logic :-). By the way, I live in KY and do much of my driving even further to the south in Alabama...so you may have to make that 110 miles per hour that far south...:-) Do you think that will work with state troopers, that with no AC you get to drive faster the further south you are to compensate? It's the only humane way to handle it I would say...
I will find out which one is better in two weeks. I have a 2008 Cayman S with titronic shfit and ordered a Cayman R with PDK in Feb. that should arrive in end of May or early June. I love the mid engine design of the Cayman.
@llovevuvu My uncle races his GT3 with the Porsche Club of America, and he and other racers never use the AC. The Cayman R was designed for track use and is commonly used at Porsche Club race events (alongside similar stripped-out Porsches like the Boxster Spyder, GT3 and GT3 RS). For road use the R doesn't make too much sense as Porsche owners would likely never notice the difference between a Cayman S and Cayman R.
Opting for the no air conditioning is a gutsy move....it essentailly marks the car as a one you would buy for yourself for the joy of driving. Most of the U.S. is unbearable in summer with no air-conditioning, so it is not the kind of car for weekend excursions with the girlfriend or wife (have you ever tried to deal with a woman in an non-air conditioned car in the summer...its not pretty). This car would appeal to a very select group of performance enthusiasts, hang the tail out crowd.
@JaySee5 I don't think that would end well for the Boxster, at least in terms of performance. Caymans are generally regarded as the better-handling between the two, and I imagine the same would be true of these stripped-out versions.
@minibus1351 You simply have to factor in how much any of the differences would cost if you tried to do them yourself on the S, and the value comes somewhat into view.
What's the demand factor for this car? Is it for enthusiasts who want a nice Porsche but don't want to look like all the other 911-leasing jerk offs in their town? Saw one today. It looked good.
Porsche needs to take the cayman to its full potential, it would be amazing to see the 4.0L flat six from the gt3rs 4.0 in the cayman with a lighter chassis. Call it the cayman rs haha.
@DumpValvesAndDnB I agree. I think as long as a car looks pretty and drives and handles well and is of course fun to drive, then that's all that should matter for the average person.
@zephyrod Don't know why people are hung up on lap times for this. We know that a Cayman R driven equally well will be slightly faster than a Cayman S. What's pointless is having a number that means nothing for how you'll actually drive the car yourself.
I would like to see the Cayman R vs. the only NSX-R in UK. It will be a good comparison to see Porsche did something magical in a decade since the NA2 NSX-R.
@100littlecurses that's exactly what I'm thinking! AC is pretty much essential and the performance upgrade doesn't seem to be worth it. If it was substantially more lighter with more carbon fibre body parts then maybe..
@JaySee5 Ah, I see what you mean. I thought you meant like a competitive thing to see which is faster. But it sounds like you're talking about something more along the lines of the 911 Carrera vs 911 GT2 RS video Autocar did a while back.
True...but whne you drive a small fast car (Porsche Cayman S) it's important that other drivers see you coming, even if that does require a less than attractive color. Ray
As a 911 admirer, this is no denying the MR triumphs over the RR. I would love to see a Cayman Turbo or a Cayman RS. It might make the 911 life more difficult, but that just strives the engineers in Porsche to make the 991 even more amazing than anything else. The 911 is already a top of the class car, but I believe that they can make it even better.
For those wanting numbers or detailed information the place to visit for Cayman information is planet-9.com which specializes in the Cayman and is home of the Cayman Club and various Cayman-related racing series. BTW, watch the two cars on the road at the beginning, you can see the stiffer suspension reactions in the Cayman R vs. the S, very similar to having PASM in sport mode.
@3089280288 well, the up front PCCB cost are no real concern. I was thinking of the maintenance costs. I swap out my rear tires twice a year and get new fronts as needed. The brakes, however, seem to really survive a lot of abuse neatly and work wonderfully. I have put a very hard 20,000 km on my current set and the Porsche techs tell me I have 60% of my front pads left and 80% on the rear. The standard brakes on the Cayman S are really wonderful. The ceramics? Well, who knows really.
@zephyrod The problem is, again, that we know it'll be slightly better -- not a huge amount better, simply because it's about 50kg lighter and a little bit more powerful. I'd argue that the subjective driving experience described in the video is more important, because that's how it'll actually feel from day to day. Unless you hit the track every week and genuinely care about your lap times, you need more than just numbers.
Drove the Cayman R for two days already. It is faster than the S but not as comfortable. The 7 speed PDK is excellent, respond quicker than the titronic. For US$3,600 more, I definitely recommend the Cayman R than the S. But if you don't mind to sacrific a little performance and want more comfort for daily driving. You should consider the S. I had a 2008 Cayman S with titronic for three years and still love it. but can't keep both. BTW, either the R or S handles better than the 911.
The unsprung weight saved by the wheels makes the most difference...get your self those rims..a decatt/remap...same suspension set up and turn your "S" into an "R"
Also, the black fixed spoiler of the Cayman R makes the car looks much more sexier than the S. The leather steering wheel in the R is also a plus. Overall, the Cayman R is a better driving car in all aspects but not as comfort as the S. The R definitely has the better look than the S. BTW, both my Cayman R and S are Speedy Yellow in Color. I think that is the best color for any Porsche.
@shobin05 LOL! The cayman is a boxster coupe... and the boxster is a cayman cabriolet. They are literally exactly the same, same engine (in the base model). They just made this car to make money, what they should do is scrap the boxster and make the Cayman in a coupe and cabrio...
A car, no matter how fast or furious, is not a car without a radio and Air Con. I also prefer the shape of the Cayman S. I'm sorry, the R is for regression.
@minibus1351 Exactly. I mean, if you put a person in the passenger seat, the weight saving is gone. Also, I don't think 110 lbs is noticeable in a car's performance and cornering ability.
@@MoskusMoskiferus1611 Possibly now, different sources say different things it seems.. although it always used to be for Super, 356 Super 90 for example although not shortened to ‘S’, 944 S definitely stood for Super aswell. Maybe Porsche have fallen in line with most other manufactures who offer sport (S) models. Either way I prefer Super, any Porsche is meant to be sporty, and an ‘S’ Porsche is just Super!
@CarAddictCrAzY Your question is stupid.. its ride comfort is obviously worse since its an R version. Stiffer suspension etc. It weighs 50 kilos less and has 10 more horses.. go figure that its not insanely faster, its only more agile and better at turn in. Top speed has probably hardly moved as well, if u are really that interested in minor details go check wikipedia ;)
@postalshack The Lap Time is the only thing that proves if all the weight saving and the extra cost are worth it. In this video they just tell us what we can read in a magazine or an article I would have wanted to see a Drag Race between the two, a shoot out, lap times, something that proves the R version is worth the money, i mean How much better is it really is against the S ???
The Spyder and theR perform nearly identically for all practical purposes. The difference wil be the driver. Both are amazing. As are each of the 987 variants produced to date. No serious enthusiast thinks otherwise.
look at that turn in!!! 0:18 :O ....and for all you begging for lap time. He perfectly explained the difference between the characteristsics of the 2 cars. He's not a racing driver, im sure you aren't so why is an extra 6 tenths or so so important to you? The extra feel and enjoyment you get from driving it is what is important. There are only 2 kinds of people who compare road cars using lap times; Knobs and show-offs.
Cayman R cost 3 times as much on the used market as the non R model with same engine and same horse power... If you buy new then buy GT, R or similar as they will tripple or more in value if you sell them later compared to the regular models.
I think the one of the best parts about this car is that you can actually use it everyday, with its double-trunk space and PDK, plus the balanced suspension.
I think for 50kg I'd rather have a radio and A/C
that would cannibalize the 911, that why Porsche refuse to put power in it near the 911 hierarchy because they know this is a much superior chassis layout etc, and better looking to most.
Dreadzedan *Cayman GT4 and Boxster Spyder 981 and 982 enter the chat*
nice filming , good information, good drivers
fantastic channel !!!
The only reason the Cayman doesn't have a bigger engine is because Porsche want a middle-of-the-road Porsche. They have the Boxter, the Cayman and the 911 (modern) of the sports cars. You could theoretically put the heaviest 911 engine into the Cayman, but then it would be better. The Cayman isn't supposed to be better.
I love driving the Cayman S, my buddy has one that he lets me drive. A most generous man. Poise and enthusiasm are my best description of these cars. But no air con and no radio/sound system, what a downer for the R. Especially for Australian conditions, no air is one thing but our roads eat lightweight rims for snacks. Porsche must be commended on going mid engine. Future Carreras will be thus.
@gurvir44 fantastic car i'm a big audi fan myself especially there motorsport division, 24th april lemans 24h test race :D fantastic. looking to buy an A1 built from the chassis of a vw polo, 1.4l 185bhp and dual clutch gearbox, if your from the states then i dont think its out coming to the USA not yet anyway. what engine did you go for?
Finally! I have been waiting for this comparision!!!!
Shows up in a holden t-shirt to test a Porsche...
@itsdastuff So you want/ need traction control in your sports car? Every time I get in the Caymen S (without the lsd) I turn off the PASM. I'd rather control it myself personally especially on track/ autox.
Would love one of either as they are definitely the two most driver focused 987s. Unfortunately The R won't depreciate and the S has bore score woes.
That's a Gen2 version with the revised engine, no reports of scored bores on those.
The prices on the Cayman R now, are so up in the roof..
It's not just that. Its got a bit more power, a different tune, different cam. Also the suspension is different, and the wheels are the lightest wheels any porsche has on them. I don't think anyone would really buy this though, unless they were a purist and either collected cars, or actually raced them on the track.
In my opinion these Caymans are the best looking Porsches made at the moment. That rear end finally looks refined. I really love it!
I love that green - both shades are not bad at all! I prefer blue, but damn I could live with that darker, richer green with some blue tones.
Im picking up my Cayman R tomorrow. Test drove it and certainly is the best handling car iv driven. Never driven a 911 or a cayman s but i dont need to as i dont want one. In time when i can afford the next step up ill go for a 997 911 gt3. but they are silly money and i doubt they will depreciate anymore. Dont see why ppl keep comparing the Cayman and 911, they are different cars, aimed at ppl who want different things. Ones mid engine ones rear. one has 2 seats the other has 4. one has rear wheel drive and the other can come in 4 wheel drive soft top, targa and coupe, turbo. So many differences but ppl still think they can be compared.
@spencermel is that why the porsche 911 turbo roasts the z06 on the nurburgring?
No mention of brakes at all? I am thinking of moving to a Carrera GTS in the spring or perhaps another Cayman S but with the ceramic brakes, pasm and the usual sport options. Not too sure about those ceramic brakes however. My primary concern is that the cost versus the benefit just is not there. The standard brakes seem to be up to the task very well and are fairly cheap to swap out pads and rotors. The ceramics are offensive in cost for maybe 10% better performance. It is a tough call.
@subestimado You're absolutely right. We have 911 (aspirated) GT3 RS MKII and 911 (not-aspirated) GT2 RS, which are also "track cars" like these you said: Boxter Spyder and Cayman R. They're all great and they value what you pay, but I still prefer a Boxter Spyder, don't you?
PS: "I don't know if the Cayman is better, it's just a Boxster with a roof", Jeremy Clarkson.
great reviewer with awesome driving skills.
@MikeW259 I like your logic :-). By the way, I live in KY and do much of my driving even further to the south in Alabama...so you may have to make that 110 miles per hour that far south...:-) Do you think that will work with state troopers, that with no AC you get to drive faster the further south you are to compensate? It's the only humane way to handle it I would say...
I will find out which one is better in two weeks. I have a 2008 Cayman S with titronic shfit and ordered a Cayman R with PDK in Feb. that should arrive in end of May or early June. I love the mid engine design of the Cayman.
@llovevuvu My uncle races his GT3 with the Porsche Club of America, and he and other racers never use the AC. The Cayman R was designed for track use and is commonly used at Porsche Club race events (alongside similar stripped-out Porsches like the Boxster Spyder, GT3 and GT3 RS). For road use the R doesn't make too much sense as Porsche owners would likely never notice the difference between a Cayman S and Cayman R.
Opting for the no air conditioning is a gutsy move....it essentailly marks the car as a one you would buy for yourself for the joy of driving. Most of the U.S. is unbearable in summer with no air-conditioning, so it is not the kind of car for weekend excursions with the girlfriend or wife (have you ever tried to deal with a woman in an non-air conditioned car in the summer...its not pretty). This car would appeal to a very select group of performance enthusiasts, hang the tail out crowd.
@JaySee5 I don't think that would end well for the Boxster, at least in terms of performance. Caymans are generally regarded as the better-handling between the two, and I imagine the same would be true of these stripped-out versions.
@minibus1351 You simply have to factor in how much any of the differences would cost if you tried to do them yourself on the S, and the value comes somewhat into view.
@Chunderitis Those are options, you can add them on.
What's the demand factor for this car? Is it for enthusiasts who want a nice Porsche but don't want to look like all the other 911-leasing jerk offs in their town? Saw one today. It looked good.
Porsche needs to take the cayman to its full potential, it would be amazing to see the 4.0L flat six from the gt3rs 4.0 in the cayman with a lighter chassis. Call it the cayman rs haha.
It's here the Cayman gt4rs
@@p1fly 11 years later lol
@DumpValvesAndDnB I agree. I think as long as a car looks pretty and drives and handles well and is of course fun to drive, then that's all that should matter for the average person.
@zephyrod Don't know why people are hung up on lap times for this. We know that a Cayman R driven equally well will be slightly faster than a Cayman S. What's pointless is having a number that means nothing for how you'll actually drive the car yourself.
I would like to see the Cayman R vs. the only NSX-R in UK. It will be a good comparison to see Porsche did something magical in a decade since the NA2 NSX-R.
@xevious2501 You can add the radio with NO additional cost. The AC is $1700!!
Problem with that, the 911 would have to be discontinued.
@100littlecurses that's exactly what I'm thinking! AC is pretty much essential and the performance upgrade doesn't seem to be worth it. If it was substantially more lighter with more carbon fibre body parts then maybe..
Now they should do a Boxster Spyder vs Cayman R comparison.
Am I the only one who noticed he’s a Pom in England driving a Porsche wearing a “holden” t shirt
How/why
@JaySee5 Ah, I see what you mean. I thought you meant like a competitive thing to see which is faster. But it sounds like you're talking about something more along the lines of the 911 Carrera vs 911 GT2 RS video Autocar did a while back.
really cool cars!
True...but whne you drive a small fast car (Porsche Cayman S) it's important that other drivers see you coming, even if that does require a less than attractive color. Ray
As a 911 admirer, this is no denying the MR triumphs over the RR. I would love to see a Cayman Turbo or a Cayman RS. It might make the 911 life more difficult, but that just strives the engineers in Porsche to make the 991 even more amazing than anything else. The 911 is already a top of the class car, but I believe that they can make it even better.
9 years later, gt4 and gt4 rs
For those wanting numbers or detailed information the place to visit for Cayman information is planet-9.com which specializes in the Cayman and is home of the Cayman Club and various Cayman-related racing series. BTW, watch the two cars on the road at the beginning, you can see the stiffer suspension reactions in the Cayman R vs. the S, very similar to having PASM in sport mode.
personally i think this is one of the most beautiful porsches out. how much tourque, horse does this beast has?
great driver´!
@3089280288 well, the up front PCCB cost are no real concern. I was thinking of the maintenance costs. I swap out my rear tires twice a year and get new fronts as needed. The brakes, however, seem to really survive a lot of abuse neatly and work wonderfully. I have put a very hard 20,000 km on my current set and the Porsche techs tell me I have 60% of my front pads left and 80% on the rear. The standard brakes on the Cayman S are really wonderful. The ceramics? Well, who knows really.
@zephyrod The problem is, again, that we know it'll be slightly better -- not a huge amount better, simply because it's about 50kg lighter and a little bit more powerful. I'd argue that the subjective driving experience described in the video is more important, because that's how it'll actually feel from day to day. Unless you hit the track every week and genuinely care about your lap times, you need more than just numbers.
lol @ his Holden t-shirt.
Uniform of every second bogan in Australia!
nice Holden t-Shirt !!
AWESOME , HE'S WEARING A HOLDEN SHIRT!
i live in brackley the nearest town to silverstone and i ride my motorbike around all the roads he goes on at the start :P
I DEMAND Porsche make a Cayman Turbo.
@KaiserKujo
Why would I wear a Ferrari cap in Denmark?
Because it looks cool and it's an awesome car manufacturer.
Drove the Cayman R for two days already. It is faster than the S but not as comfortable. The 7 speed PDK is excellent, respond quicker than the titronic. For US$3,600 more, I definitely recommend the Cayman R than the S. But if you don't mind to sacrific a little performance and want more comfort for daily driving. You should consider the S. I had a 2008 Cayman S with titronic for three years and still love it. but can't keep both. BTW, either the R or S handles better than the 911.
@3:08, that is a scary guardrail :o
4:17 "oodles of feel" :3
4:43why did he brake at the apex?
3:10 awesome!
@tanner1ie oh, of course, i forgot to mention that but the place where i live, its quite hot here. have to prefer AC over music this time!
which is which ?
This dude can drive... he's so smooth.
@MrLoose26 maybe, he also noted it might have been from the LSD.
@JETZcorp The point would be to see how much performance you lose by going convertible since they're almost the same car.
The unsprung weight saved by the wheels makes the most difference...get your self those rims..a decatt/remap...same suspension set up and turn your "S" into an "R"
Also, the black fixed spoiler of the Cayman R makes the car looks much more sexier than the S. The leather steering wheel in the R is also a plus. Overall, the Cayman R is a better driving car in all aspects but not as comfort as the S. The R definitely has the better look than the S. BTW, both my Cayman R and S are Speedy Yellow in Color. I think that is the best color for any Porsche.
@JETZcorp No, just like this video. We know the R is faster, but it shows what's gained and what's lost in going up to the R from the S.
I love this video
The should put the 3.8 L 400 HP engine from the Carrera S in the Cayman.
I think you certainly have the foresight in seeing that happen. Look at the new GT4.
Cayman gt4 lol
Jason wong Yes, I posted this a year ago, evidently Porsche had the same thinking I did.
BarakaObama2012 Yes but they also use long gearing and have detuned the engine to 385hp.. so not quite the car we were expecting!
@shobin05 LOL! The cayman is a boxster coupe... and the boxster is a cayman cabriolet. They are literally exactly the same, same engine (in the base model). They just made this car to make money, what they should do is scrap the boxster and make the Cayman in a coupe and cabrio...
A car, no matter how fast or furious, is not a car without a radio and Air Con. I also prefer the shape of the Cayman S. I'm sorry, the R is for regression.
@n9athan Hell, I guess it would more than do with a 911 Carrera engine, provided it had the lightweight body of a Cayman R.
@minibus1351 Exactly. I mean, if you put a person in the passenger seat, the weight saving is gone. Also, I don't think 110 lbs is noticeable in a car's performance and cornering ability.
@CarAddictCrAzY Lighter steering, he talks about how it moves the weight around into under or oversteer. That is called handling my god sir.
the cayman R is pretty much my ideal trackday car minus something nuts like a gallardo superleggera
And ironically, an old Porsche drives past in the background @ 5:16.
There is an in depth review of the '12 Cayman R here:
definitiveautoreview . com/road-tests/12-porsche-cayman-r/
@geforce5700fx very very true comment. thanks for that.
greetings from germany
They wont do that because it would out perform the gt3 and Porsche sales could go down. Good idea for a car though!
@shobin05 the cayman is pretty much a coupe boxter and a boxter is a cayman roadster haha.
@wownurdable
Cayman S(treet)
Cayman R(acetrack)
Actually S is for Super and R in this case is Racing. But the summary is spot on
@@drewwalton5973. I believe S is for Sport
@@MoskusMoskiferus1611 Possibly now, different sources say different things it seems.. although it always used to be for Super, 356 Super 90 for example although not shortened to ‘S’, 944 S definitely stood for Super aswell. Maybe Porsche have fallen in line with most other manufactures who offer sport (S) models. Either way I prefer Super, any Porsche is meant to be sporty, and an ‘S’ Porsche is just Super!
@randombloke10 lol just making sure, cuz i just spent 65g on a audi a6 and was wondering lol.
@CarAddictCrAzY Your question is stupid.. its ride comfort is obviously worse since its an R version. Stiffer suspension etc. It weighs 50 kilos less and has 10 more horses.. go figure that its not insanely faster, its only more agile and better at turn in. Top speed has probably hardly moved as well, if u are really that interested in minor details go check wikipedia ;)
With modern Cup2 tyres this car should be an amazing drinving machine nowdays.
@mornadu ok fine but what about the rest that i said?
NO aircon. Ah that's why I can't find a Cayman R in Australia. I'll stick with my S :)
he was talking all serious and with a straight face then he suddenly went "hehehe~" hahahaha
@shobin05 Boxster is cayman roadster and cayman is Boxster coupe ;)
@lastmiles 8 thousand for the ceramics.
since he is already at a track, why did they not compare their lap times and see the difference?
Put the stickiest tires on the R AND THEN see how it goes around a track.
@postalshack The Lap Time is the only thing that proves if all the weight saving and the extra cost are worth it. In this video they just tell us what we can read in a magazine or an article I would have wanted to see a Drag Race between the two, a shoot out, lap times, something that proves the R version is worth the money, i mean How much better is it really is against the S ???
The Spyder and theR perform nearly identically for all practical purposes. The difference wil be the driver.
Both are amazing. As are each of the 987 variants produced to date.
No serious enthusiast thinks otherwise.
@boy638 They don't have a tame racing driver who could return credible times?
It's the limited slip diff. Wish it were standard.
odd review this one, he says the R has more understeer than the S but ends up saying it's 10 to 15 % better handling.
So what Autocar are basically saying is that you should go and watch the latest MCN video about 3 vehicles that normal people can afford.
i like the holden shirt
pretty nice
look at that turn in!!! 0:18 :O
....and for all you begging for lap time. He perfectly explained the difference between the characteristsics of the 2 cars. He's not a racing driver, im sure you aren't so why is an extra 6 tenths or so so important to you? The extra feel and enjoyment you get from driving it is what is important.
There are only 2 kinds of people who compare road cars using lap times; Knobs and show-offs.
He is so happy driving the R
Cayman R cost 3 times as much on the used market as the non R model with same engine and same horse power... If you buy new then buy GT, R or similar as they will tripple or more in value if you sell them later compared to the regular models.