Head over to our shop to get exclusive kurzgesagt merch and sciency products designed with love. Getting something from the kurzgesagt shop is the best way to support us and to keep our videos free for everyone. ►► kgs.link/shopkgs (Worldwide Shipping Available)
yeah there was a warning that the us was sending nukes towards them but petrov thought it was just a miscommunication/error and left it alone when he was ordered to also fire nukes.
@@connieleblanc6212 my understanding is now all the people that dont need to know what action they are carrying out are blocked out by design. that includes the operators, the people at the lower chain of commands, they just press buttons on a schedule or occasionally do surprise drills which they would have no way of knowing that the specific button sequence they put in just launched a nuke, a light at some dude's desk or did nothing at all.
Face Fish yup because in most Scenarios nuclear war would happen so it’s best that you just die immediately and not have to deal with radiation and fans of people trying to kill you every second
As a Japanese, i was taught that the survivors (but dying) of HIroshima and Nagasaki were ringing like bells because of the lots of pieces of glass in their bodies and they had their peeled skins in their hands. it is just terrifying.
@@mootssss Politics, everything to the end, meant that they would fight to the end, they were close to surrender, but most likely it would be followed by a month or more of war and there were over 200 thousand casualties, and the communists had to be shown that yes..
@@mootssss Incorrect, the leaders of the Japanese Military literally staged a coup to keep the war going Hiroshima. They were not even convinced it was nuclear and were going to fight till every last man. It was their written policy and doctrine. It wasn't until Nagasaki that the Emperor had to step in and agree to a total surrender. Every single documentation, account, and historian alligns with the fact that Japan was not going to surrender even after they had already been nuked once.
No, actually. Depending on the ambient conditions - mainly how clear and/or bright it is outside when the attack happens - flash blindness can affect people up to about 85 km away.
"We cannot change the fact that Hiroshima was the first atomic bombing site. However, it is up to us whether Nagasaki will be the last.'' As a Japanese citizen of Nagasaki, I will deliver these words to the world.
That's an interesting question. The general theory is that because the bomb exploded high in the air, more nuclear contaminants were dispersed into the atmosphere. Another cause is water being washed away by rain or the ground being filled in. On the other hand, the soil at Chernobyl and Fukushima contains a lot of nuclear contaminants. That's because they exploded on the ground.
@@user-nb2mw1py1j Apparently it was done to "maximise damage". It seems it only took a temporary toll I pray that no one has to witness nuclear bombings again, I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.
@@PianistifiedForYT Little Boy contained 64 kg of uranium, Fat Man only 6.4 kg of plutonium, and due to being air bursts the radioactive fallout was extremely fine dust carried to high altitude and dispersed. Chernobyl vomited several *tonnes* of radioactive material into the environment, and a large amount of it was in the form of larger particles and fragments that were deposited onto the immediate surroundings.
@@ArturoTorresSanchez thats what i was inferring, and it will never happen sadly. we should be dismantelling the bombs and use the uranium, plutonium and other recources used for nuclear reactors, and produce energy with them
My grandfather lost his right leg in the war and was transferred from a hospital in Hiroshima to another hospital far away. If my grandfather's hospital transfer had been delayed, I wouldn't be here now. So what is said in this video is not someone else's problem for me. I hope that today's politicians and military do not make wrong or terrible choices for the sake of those who are yet to be born.
Good grief, this is wrong on so many levels. Your grandfather escaped a fire bombing. Hiroshima wasn't even in the top 20 most destroyed Japanese cities. How could that have happened with "the most destructive bomb in history"?? Because it was a propagandized fake.
Except that they didn't. It's easily provable that nukes are fake. Nagasaki and Heroshima weren't even in the top 15 most destroyed Japanese cities. It was a media/propaganda HOAX to scare the world into submission. And yes, the same people that control the USA control the rest of the world. Use some critical thinking, ffs.
In pretty much all atomic bomb videos, I see people who say the Japanese deserved it. My retort is that there’s a difference between individuals (eg Japanese civilians, military personnel, government officials etc) and a collective (eg the Japanese people, the nation of Japan etc). Most Japanese civilians either just minded their own business or at most supported the war efforts within their own country like civilians in other countries that engaged in the war did during a time when information was not as freely accessible as in uncensored areas today. Mostly only some government officials and military personnel decided on and carried out the attack on Pearl Harbor and other atrocities during WW2. Since the majority of the blame should be on some of the government officials and military personnel, it would generally be unfair to say the Japanese civilians or civilians of any country deserved being nuclear bombed or have other atrocities committed against them. For the purpose of these types of discussions, it is overly simplistic and sometimes even hateful to just group the individuals into collectives like the Japanese, the Americans etc.
Correct. These statements you are talking about really only mean anything in a world where there is only collective agency. I don’t endorse a lot of my own nation’s foreign policy, so why ought I be culpable for their decisions?
The entrance to the Atomic Bomb Dome in Hiroshima clearly states the historical fact that the Japanese military invaded China and other countries. In other words, Japan is not unconcerned about its own crimes. I am saddened by the fact that the world's worst weapon was dropped on the heads of the innocent people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, regardless of what Japan did in the Pacific War.
Correction: the bombings of Pearl Harbor was not a simple act of war, since the bombings occurred mainly on weekends, the armed personnel were considered civilians as well. Hope this clears up any confusion about the Japanese civilians didn’t deserve this.
Except unless action was taken against the actual people, the government wasn’t going to stop, and there wasn’t any single government facility nuke site that would’ve convinced the Japanese to end the war, it’s of course heartless, but it saved thousands of American soldiers from going into a deadly ground war on enemy turf
I'm Japanese and a grandchild of atomic bomb victims. In Japan, all children learn about the real damage of nuclear weapons, but nowadays, atomic bomb victims are over 80 years old. So we are hard to know real voice of victim... I think this video can tell us the threat of nuclear weapons clearly. Thank you for making this video. I strongly want everyone in this world to know that nuclear weapons are not " just large bombs", they mean " literally the end of the world". I hope Nagasaki becomes the last place where was attacked by nuclear weapons.
Thank you for creating this educational video with such high quality and understandable script. It truly raises awareness of it, no matter how much or how little. I hope no one would launch any nuke ever again. 😢
My grandmother saw the light of the atomic bomb in Okayama, next to Hiroshima. It took two hours by car from the hypocenter in Hiroshima to my grandma's house, which is about 135Km if you search on Google map. For me, I had never really felt how powerful it was, even though I had heard and seen it in classes and anime. It is very frightening to hear my grandma's story and to think that today's nuclear bombs may be more powerful than they were back then.
Rubixia I mean it is really. Then what is the point of using two different type of bombs? It is nothing but testing and showing how “strong” you are. Just use the same bomb you tested if it is not testing.
Murasaki Budou Japan always fought till the end no matter what they do. That’s why you don’t want to invade main land Japan it was a test and yes it was to show how strong they are but the war would just go on if we didn’t do that.
the best thing to do when you get inside go lowest remember the fallout will plate out on the roof what you want to do stay aslow as you canin the base ment get against the basement wall gosh I wish I could draw a picture of a house, when your'e against the wall sit on the floorremember the fallout is possibly on the ground out side even with the actual ground level getting below ground level is best.move beds into the basement,maybe I should do a video on what to do next: it's too much in formation to type in a comment space.
More accurate version "Hey, that cloud looks like a car" "That one looks like a dog" "a- AAAA HELP I SAW A FLASH OF LIGHT NOW IM BLIND HELP HE- AAAAAAAAAA THE WINDOW SHATTERED THERES LOTS OF GLASS SHARDS STUCK IN MY BO- WAIT WHAT IM DEAF? I CANT HEAR ANYTHI- AAA ITS SO PAINFUL JESUS THERES A PUDDLE OF BLOOD UNDER ME IM GONNA DIE SOO- **passes out**" **dies moments after, later his body gets burned and turned into coal** **his friends that escaped start vomiting and die of radiation soon after their skin starts peeling away**
Lol, old? No, it's not weird. 4 years is the length of HS. That is a long time for you. Now, at 43, 3-4 years feels like 1 used to. Seriously. You won't notice it much until about your mid 30s. Then ... ZANG!
Wow, I was older than u are now on 9/11. Sorry, I just can't sleep and was already ruminating about age and time, and your comment struck me as so innocent and sweet. You need not ever feel weird or defective or whatever over your own feelings. NEVER.
Still scary 3 years later. I learnt years ago that my little coastal town had at one time, or maybe still has 4 missiles aimed at it. Hopefully if it happens, we go quick.
Smh you really think they would aim 4 missiles at some random town instead of things like New York, London, Toronto, Istanbul or litterally any other large cities in the world
@@Ocoro_Depends on the town really. & 4 missiles ain't nothing to militaries out to fight wars. They're looking to fire such things at least in the hundreds in just a single year after all.
@@Ocoro_ we are a deep water harbour, so all those big US ships use to refuel at, so in the cold era. Pretty strategic to wipe a line like that. And also NYC, would only need one massive bomb to wipe out a chunk of the densely populated city like that. For example.
@@cheesecake667 Both would survive, but the government, infrastructure and populations would be beyond repair. Tens to hundreds of millions will die on both sides, even in the best case scenario, it's a pyrrhic victory.
2018: "What If You Detonated a Nuclear Bomb in the Marianas Trench?" 2019: "What if We Nuke a City?" 2020: "What if we Started a Nuclear arms War?" 2021: "What if we Started a Global Slaughter of Billions with Nuclear Bombs?" 2022: "Presuade us not to launch these Nukes"
In Hiroshima, they did restore the railway and get in some supplies and help in 48 hours. But that is also because, there was some practice in responding to firebombing of cities. The problem is, if you survived the blast you need to get as far away as possible, as soon as possible. The radiation damage is cumulative.
The problem here, is the threat of mutually assured destruction is enough to stave off some who would otherwise be more inclined to drop them in the first place. This is why simply saying "Nukes are bad, destroy all of them..." doesn't work. If everyone agreed to do it, but then some of the more notorious leaders didn't, but everyone else did, there's no threat to prevent them from using them. Removing your strongest weapons from the table without being able to ensure everyone else actually does it to won't help anyone, it will lead only to destruction of those who follow it.
That's always been the issue among nations. Until nations put ink to paper for treaties and alliances, iron clad agreements of non-aggression, and work to maintain amicable relations, the threat of war is always there. It may be low in modern times, but it's a non-zero number. And given how tensions all across the world are rising, externally and internally, the idea of demilitarizing and denuclearizing is as unappealing as ever. We're on the cusp of a potential WWIII, everyone can see it. All it takes is that first spark. As the saying goes, it's better to have a weapon and not use it, than to need a weapon and not have it. And unfortunately, this is our best method of preventing WWIII.
@@vallahdsacretor4839 "iron clad agreements of non-aggression" - Unfortunately, this is never going to be possible. Even if you 'had' a treaty that forbade any kind of aggression on a global scale, it doesn't actually 'prevent' those things from taking place. Russia/Ukraine is a classic example. Russia has breached numerous geneva conventions, including attacking civilian medical facilties. But how do you enforce that, beyond through military force?
@@Grigeral You furthered your original point but likely not in the way you thought. The Ukrainians agreed to relinquish the Soviet-era warheads left on their soil after the USSR fell with the understanding that they would not face Russian aggression or have any chance of becoming a NATO signatory (to avoid encircling / threatening Russian territory). The West in the years since then actively screwed them over by continuing to make overtures and flirt with the idea of bringing them into the EU and/or NATO, and even had a hand in the 2014 coup that installed heavily anti-Russo politicians into power. While that doesn't excuse the invasion, it does show that giving up a potential nuclear deterrent paired with the manner of world policing statecraft that has become notorious over decades is a recipe for a nation caught in the middle to be at greater risk of attack.
@@The_Lucent_Archangel it was more a hypothetical argument I was making on how you enforce something when you have nothing to back it up. What you're raising is a whole other argument. My stance on that, would be that Ukraine is not a part of Russia. As such, Russia have zero say over who Ukraine have dealings with, be it NATO or otherwise, whether they like it or not. It might justify the war in the eyes of Russian officials, but that's pretty much it. They have no control over them, so have don't have rights like they seem to believe.
There are a number of variables not discussed here. The yield of the nuke is the biggest one and how many tall buildings, and how tall, are in the blast area is another big variable.
The best game to play is choosing where you are in the city when the blast happens, do you want to stop existing in a nanosecond, burn alive in several seconds, be annihilated by forceful winds, shattered infrastructure, and tornado expulsions, or slowly die in the outskirts after being abandoned
Once you get rid of nuclear weapons it's back to having large standing armies so say goodbye to non mandatory military service. Nuclear weapons ironically made peace possible( because the leaders know they're also in the cross hairs now, or at least collateral if those start flying, unlike before when they could be sipping tea while your father/brother/husband/son would be bleeding to death in a ditch somewhere.
If you can get a propane tank filled with liquid hydrogen to stay cool with liquid nitrogen you can use a tattoo removal laser for a triggering mechanism and have an explosive that reaches nuclear sometimes; like a "sometimes nuke". Not a huge radius.
There was a TV movie about the explosion of a small nuke in Charleston SC. The mention in this video of the blizzard of sharp glass was seen later in the show, when a newswoman kneels down to pick glass out of the back of a coworker.
Thank you! I am currently doing research for a novella I'm writing that takes place after a devastating nuclear war, but with a heavy focus on realism, no cut corners. I won't nuke anything, but I won't BS my way through it either.
This is not well known in foreign countries, but the number of victims in Hiroshima and Nagasaki continues to increase year by year, and that has exceeded 520,000 so far. This is because deaths from diseases due to exposure are also counted.
Jesus taught that the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is seminal ejaculation! The super elite that run this world are hybrid demons that look human but need sperm to survive! They created Hollywood and Porn and many other pawns to achieve this evil. Seminal ejaculation is why G-d sent the flood to destroy the people in Noah’s day. And now G-d will send Fire to destroy the USA and the world. The USA is the 2nd beast from revelations. The 7 churches are the bodies 7 chakras. Jesus taught these things including reincarnation and karma but the Pope with the Catholic Church rewrote and perverted. Remember to have a true relationship with G-d is to not ever ejaculate the sperm for it creates and draws demons to men! The point of sex is not ejaculation for it is the sin that got Adam cast out of eden. The point is to do work of Abraham to escape this cycle of reincarnation and the evil one Yaldabaoth who in Greek is Cronos. All religions come from Christ for Abraham Buddha Vishnu Thoth Hermes would tell you this. Please read the pistis Sophia. Gnostic teachings online. Gnostic gospels. The perfect Matrimony and the book of revelations.
I mean, you do realize that no matter what damage we cause to the earth it will never be enough to actually permanently damage the earth itself. Even a nuclear bomb is nothing compared to mother nature. Yeah we get to see the effects that are caused, and yes we can see the damage, but when we are all dead and the earth is still rotating, it will heal itself. You just won't see it. The way he said this statement is confusing, but only if you don't understand how the Earth's ecosystem works.
@Oscar Burner I know right, I mean don't get me wrong I know that even though nuclear weapons are the "most destructive force on Earth" it's really only temporary. Humans always seem to find a way to make things "bigger" or "better" or even make new technologies but in actuality they just digging their graves even further down. I mean don't get me wrong having technologies that will keep our enemies at bay is nice, but when you notice that is just a veiled threat of safety due to "mutually assured destruction" but really millions will die just by one bomb being launched. Cascade effect. I know I am going on a tyrade, but if we could just focus our scientific knowledge on improving how to better our lives, not destroy them, then I'll be very happy.
The most frightening point of this video is the fact that "all the cruel phenomena described in this video actually took place on two separate occasions in the past." All we can do is to prevent it from happening again in the future, forever.
Go check Mutually Assured Destruction. Any country that uses nuclear weapon risks being nuked itself. So while its true that if ISIS or someone thats just completely suicidal gets their hands on nuke would be bad, nukes are also what is stopping many wars from happening. US is never going to attack Russia with nukes because it would mean they are both going to get destroyed. Also people that are just batshit crazy aren't going to care about any agreement, they will build their own nuke if they want and then be the only ones with the nuke. This is just dumb in my opinion to get rid of them
Look on the bright side, if it ever does happen and you're close enough to the blast zone it'll be the quickest death you could ever possibly hope for. I don't think you'd even have time to register the pain before you vaporise, let alone have the time to scream.
"few minutes later, those who survived will envy the dead" That's the scariest part for me. I'd rather evaporate in milliseconds than suffer next few hours.
This is nothing but fear propaganda nonsense. Nukes are fake af. If they were real, Nagasaki and Heroshima would be uninhabitable for 10,000 years.... THINK for yourself ffs.
Same. I'd consider myself luckiest in such a setting, when i'm caught in ground zero, as even being hundreds of kilometers away, free from whatever shit such an explosion would bring, there's still the fallout, radioactively, socially & politically, to deal with for years, if not decades, to come. Just about the entire world would be turned into a shithole within years, with the constant threat of yet another such explosion happening anywhere, anytime.
Its not just hotter that the sun.. Its the Hottest thing in the Universe aside from Big Bang.. Its when Atoms split, now this is something insane.. It can be Trillions of times hotter than sun..
@The Last Tennos that is actually incorrect. The super hadron collider can generate temperatures of 5.5 trillion degrees Celsius, which is way hotter than a nuclear blast.
I tried to watch this video years ago, and stopped a few minutes in because of how horrific it was. I was just now able to watch it all the way through, but am still crying.
We could be talking to good friends and family across the world, having a good time, trying to figure out our differences and healing pains and drama, connecting with other people, as people. Loved ones, friends, family, anybody... And suddenly never hear from them again. And not know anything until the world starts talking about it. People we knew and loved just gone... because people can't be trusted with these things.
Want to know what's terrifying? The Beirut Incident was only about ~20% the scale and power of the bomb dropped in Hiroshima. Just 1/5th. Watch the video again and remember the first ever nuclear bomb used against a city was 5 times bigger.
That explosion only killed around 100 people and had no nuclear fallout. i mean theres videos from like a few blocks away of people surviving with no injuries. its still horrible but absolutely nothing compared to what our nuclear warheads are capable of today. If russia dropped the tsar bomba in times square new york, it would instantly evaporate the whole island of Manhattan along with around 2 million people in around 1 second. with around another 1 million dieing within a few days from surrounding regions. now thats just one, consider the fact the russia has atleast 1,600 active nuclear weapons that they can fire pretty much all together at once, and thats enough to totally annihilate atleast a quarter of the entire U.S at once. now consider that the U.S also has around the same amount and can do just as much damage back to russia. hundreds of millions will die within a single day.
People who are spreading conspiracies about the Beirut explosion being a nuke are seriously underestimating the danger nuclear weapons pose. And somehow now it makes sense why we aren't forcing nations to disarm, most people are just so ignorant of the sheer existential horror nukes pose. I'm hoping more people like you are navigating here and realise just how destructive human can be.
Head over to our shop to get exclusive kurzgesagt merch and sciency products designed with love.
Getting something from the kurzgesagt shop is the best way to support us and to keep our videos free for everyone.
►► kgs.link/shopkgs
(Worldwide Shipping Available)
Woah, Kurzgesagt randomly conments in a random time.
I just wanna say that I love your channel, and I enjoy watching your videos.
Keep up the excellent work
@@scopex3592 exactly what that guy said!
@@tanukee7908 I agree
INDIA BEST
ALL COUNTRYS BELONG TO INDOA
Id like to take a moment to thank Stanislov Petrov, the soviet lieutenant who refused to launch nukes during the cold war when ordered to do so
yeah there was a warning that the us was sending nukes towards them but petrov thought it was just a miscommunication/error and left it alone when he was ordered to also fire nukes.
holy, that man saved everyone
Crazy to think about . Didn't they change guidelines because of it ?
@@connieleblanc6212 my understanding is now all the people that dont need to know what action they are carrying out are blocked out by design. that includes the operators, the people at the lower chain of commands, they just press buttons on a schedule or occasionally do surprise drills which they would have no way of knowing that the specific button sequence they put in just launched a nuke, a light at some dude's desk or did nothing at all.
don't forget about Vasily Alexandrovich Arkhipov too
Basically, being immediately evaporated is the best case
Face Fish yup because in most Scenarios nuclear war would happen so it’s best that you just die immediately and not have to deal with radiation and fans of people trying to kill you every second
Face Fish That is one way to see it
or not being in the explosion radius in the first place
Or being Switzerland
Hell yeah dude, if there's a nuclear war I want the very first bomb to fall directly on my head.
The power of the sun, forged into a weapon, in the hands of men.
I can't think of anything that frightens me more.
the power of the sun, forged into a weapon, in the hands of politicians
and from here, the famous quote: "Now I am become Death, destroyer of worlds"
swiming in the pool with your sock on seems 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙮 𝙨𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙮
Then you're an idiot who is easily misled. Nukes are fake.
The friendzone
As a Japanese, i was taught that the survivors (but dying) of HIroshima and Nagasaki were ringing like bells because of the lots of pieces of glass in their bodies and they had their peeled skins in their hands. it is just terrifying.
I'm sorry to all the civilians in Japan who went through this, but it seems like there were no analogues without fewer casualties, right?
@@bealet9357 Japan was already at their limit and about to surrender before the nukes were dropped anyway
@@mootssss Politics, everything to the end, meant that they would fight to the end, they were close to surrender, but most likely it would be followed by a month or more of war and there were over 200 thousand casualties, and the communists had to be shown that yes..
『はだしのゲン』見たけど本当に言葉が出ない。まるでゾンビだ
@@mootssss Incorrect, the leaders of the Japanese Military literally staged a coup to keep the war going Hiroshima. They were not even convinced it was nuclear and were going to fight till every last man. It was their written policy and doctrine. It wasn't until Nagasaki that the Emperor had to step in and agree to a total surrender. Every single documentation, account, and historian alligns with the fact that Japan was not going to surrender even after they had already been nuked once.
"It renders you blind for a few hours."
So I'm blind for the rest of my life?
True.
It’s hard to argue with his assessment
No, actually. Depending on the ambient conditions - mainly how clear and/or bright it is outside when the attack happens - flash blindness can affect people up to about 85 km away.
I feel a whoooosh
Nyann Cat I can feel it in the air...
"Eliminating all nuclear weapons an vowing to never build it again"
Countries to each other: After you
South Africa would like a word there
Exactly...
no u
thanks for pointing out the issue with this, there's probably going to be that one country that refuses, and so nobody does anything.
“Cough cough” North Korea, Iran.…
"We cannot change the fact that Hiroshima was the first atomic bombing site. However, it is up to us whether Nagasaki will be the last.''
As a Japanese citizen of Nagasaki, I will deliver these words to the world.
I have a doubt.
Chernobyl is now a wasteland which will not be inhabitable for over 4400 years. Why then are Hiroshima and Nagasaki not wastelands?
That's an interesting question.
The general theory is that because the bomb exploded high in the air, more nuclear contaminants were dispersed into the atmosphere. Another cause is water being washed away by rain or the ground being filled in.
On the other hand, the soil at Chernobyl and Fukushima contains a lot of nuclear contaminants. That's because they exploded on the ground.
@@user-nb2mw1py1j Apparently it was done to "maximise damage". It seems it only took a temporary toll
I pray that no one has to witness nuclear bombings again, I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.
@@PianistifiedForYT it also has to do with the amount of nuclear material present in a bomb vs in a nuclear power plant
@@PianistifiedForYT Little Boy contained 64 kg of uranium, Fat Man only 6.4 kg of plutonium, and due to being air bursts the radioactive fallout was extremely fine dust carried to high altitude and dispersed. Chernobyl vomited several *tonnes* of radioactive material into the environment, and a large amount of it was in the form of larger particles and fragments that were deposited onto the immediate surroundings.
After watching oppenhiemer this hits 4 times harder
"Let's get rid of all nukes!"
"Okay, you first."
"Noooooo!"
But i dont want too unless you do!
That's kind of the issue, actually.
we are getting rid of them... the us and russia have been dismantling their arsenals slowly over the past 30 years. they just need to speed it up
@@ArturoTorresSanchez thats what i was inferring, and it will never happen sadly. we should be dismantelling the bombs and use the uranium, plutonium and other recources used for nuclear reactors, and produce energy with them
@@8beef4u but are they really 🤔
"What if we nuke a city?"
Everyone: "How about we don't."
no no i like this idea
America: How about let nuke TWO cities!
North Korea: How bout I do anyway
tel aviv
How about we do!? Fucken pussy!! 👍
My grandfather lost his right leg in the war and was transferred from a hospital in Hiroshima to another hospital far away.
If my grandfather's hospital transfer had been delayed, I wouldn't be here now.
So what is said in this video is not someone else's problem for me.
I hope that today's politicians and military do not make wrong or terrible choices for the sake of those who are yet to be born.
Good grief, this is wrong on so many levels. Your grandfather escaped a fire bombing. Hiroshima wasn't even in the top 20 most destroyed Japanese cities. How could that have happened with "the most destructive bomb in history"?? Because it was a propagandized fake.
🤓
So what?
If your grandmother had been prettier, your grandfather would have come earlier and a different sperm would have reached the eggcell.
This is just rude.@@bigbupbear
@@nibble2911some people are rude, just ignore em
"You're the man who gave them the power to destroy themselves...and the world is not prepared."
The quote from the movie makes sense now...
Kurzgesagt last week: ants ants ants
Kurzgesagt this week:
haha jacksfilms antsantsantsantsantsantsantsants
@@dragonflies6793 ah, i see you're a man of culture as well.
Next week, Ants with nukes.
ANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTSANTS
I loved ant videos tho😂
“What if we nuke a city?”
Short answer: *Don’t*
Golden Hardt America: Hold my beer 🍺
Why not two?
Insightful
@@Mettaworldj i think you mean
*hold my hamburger*
Sad thing is that certain humans did...
It is absolutely mind-boggling that mankind can invent something that is hotter than the sun.
Except that they didn't. It's easily provable that nukes are fake. Nagasaki and Heroshima weren't even in the top 15 most destroyed Japanese cities. It was a media/propaganda HOAX to scare the world into submission. And yes, the same people that control the USA control the rest of the world. Use some critical thinking, ffs.
Just the power of what makes a atom a atom
It is a miniature sun
@jasonlee148 I totally understand that our sun is a small star compared to other's, but it's...STILL THE SUN!!! ☀️😳
No only the surface
Greenland 🇬🇱: My capital is Nuuk.
North Korea 🇰🇵: DID YOU SAY NUKE?!
"one moment you're on your way to work, the next you're on fire"
*Wow, that escalated quickly.*
such is life
:'(
Terrifying statement.
That's the point
Can you guys go on my yt and click on the video that says “get this video to 100k” it would really be appreciated
Short answer: They die.
Long answer: They all die.
Short answer: death
Long answer: deeeeeeaath
Very long answer: They will friken dieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Longer answer: nuclear weapons have prevented WW3 due to MAD.
Even longer answer, they’ll all die at some point
Longest answer:
TTTTTTTTTHHHHHHHEEEEEEEYYYYYY AAAAAAARRRRRREEEE DDDDDDEEEEEAAAADDD
"I am become death, the destroyer of worlds"
Came here to quote the same.
After seeing Oppenheimer I can truely understand why he was so devastated
coming back to these nuke videos doesn't seem so fun anymore
yeah...
Nope it's even more scary now
@@czcrasto4301 enjoy the adrenaline in your blood
Well Putin just wants us to be more curious, that’s all
i know right, hearing the sounds of planes now scares me
Kurzgesagt last week: "Ants are cool aren't they?"
Kurzgesagt this week: " let's nuke a city"
Parkour
It was the ants that set off the bomb.
@@zs9652 the fuckers were behind it all along
Dardan Loshi stop making memes
HxH fans: "We are no different from the ants... no we are far worse"
In pretty much all atomic bomb videos, I see people who say the Japanese deserved it. My retort is that there’s a difference between individuals (eg Japanese civilians, military personnel, government officials etc) and a collective (eg the Japanese people, the nation of Japan etc).
Most Japanese civilians either just minded their own business or at most supported the war efforts within their own country like civilians in other countries that engaged in the war did during a time when information was not as freely accessible as in uncensored areas today. Mostly only some government officials and military personnel decided on and carried out the attack on Pearl Harbor and other atrocities during WW2.
Since the majority of the blame should be on some of the government officials and military personnel, it would generally be unfair to say the Japanese civilians or civilians of any country deserved being nuclear bombed or have other atrocities committed against them.
For the purpose of these types of discussions, it is overly simplistic and sometimes even hateful to just group the individuals into collectives like the Japanese, the Americans etc.
Correct. These statements you are talking about really only mean anything in a world where there is only collective agency. I don’t endorse a lot of my own nation’s foreign policy, so why ought I be culpable for their decisions?
The entrance to the Atomic Bomb Dome in Hiroshima clearly states the historical fact that the Japanese military invaded China and other countries. In other words, Japan is not unconcerned about its own crimes.
I am saddened by the fact that the world's worst weapon was dropped on the heads of the innocent people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, regardless of what Japan did in the Pacific War.
Correction: the bombings of Pearl Harbor was not a simple act of war, since the bombings occurred mainly on weekends, the armed personnel were considered civilians as well. Hope this clears up any confusion about the Japanese civilians didn’t deserve this.
Except unless action was taken against the actual people, the government wasn’t going to stop, and there wasn’t any single government facility nuke site that would’ve convinced the Japanese to end the war, it’s of course heartless, but it saved thousands of American soldiers from going into a deadly ground war on enemy turf
The problem is, most of japanese military and gonverment personel died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And civilians were just another cost.
I'm Japanese and a grandchild of atomic bomb victims. In Japan, all children learn about the real damage of nuclear weapons, but nowadays, atomic bomb victims are over 80 years old. So we are hard to know real voice of victim...
I think this video can tell us the threat of nuclear weapons clearly. Thank you for making this video.
I strongly want everyone in this world to know that nuclear weapons are not " just large bombs", they mean " literally the end of the world".
I hope Nagasaki becomes the last place where was attacked by nuclear weapons.
"The Survivors lucky enough to be in metro tunnels"
Artyom: Oh yeah, it's all coming together
*cry in russian*
Ahhh yes
OH MY GOD YES
I just started playing this game, a very good game
just don't look at the kremlim
“What if we nuke a city”
Japan: we know a thing or two because we’ve seen a thing or two
Underated
DARK
Zombie Hunter seen a thing or *2*
We are The U S, bum parum pum, pum pum pum!!!!
the word ''or'' makes it like they've not decided it yet
Thank you for creating this educational video with such high quality and understandable script. It truly raises awareness of it, no matter how much or how little.
I hope no one would launch any nuke ever again. 😢
My grandmother saw the light of the atomic bomb in Okayama, next to Hiroshima.
It took two hours by car from the hypocenter in Hiroshima to my grandma's house, which is about 135Km if you search on Google map.
For me, I had never really felt how powerful it was, even though I had heard and seen it in classes and anime.
It is very frightening to hear my grandma's story and to think that today's nuclear bombs may be more powerful than they were back then.
They are more powerful. Hiroshima's bomb power was 15 kilotons, an average US warhead nowadays is about 200 kilotons.
nope better try megatons and they are mutable warheads not single.@@arnold3768
Living in a small town suddenly doesn’t sound so bad.
Ikr? Lmao I’m safe
I live in El Salvador, so i am safe xD
Small towns usually have steel factories that the enemy would likely target. Lol nowhere is safe!
Jay Kingston Oh noooo 😂💀
@@raulmejia6953 no your not
“Bring a piece of sun to earth”
“Explode all nuclear weapons in Amazon”
Now this
Are you planning something
They’re totally not plotting a nuclear war so the birds can take over the planet or anything
You know too much...
“I am god”-Kurzgesagt 2019
@@ImReign quick, contact hq, he can't be left alive
Is that why the Amazon is on fire?
"Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds."
-Robert J. Oppenheimer
This was really well made, thank you for the great content!
"You wouldn't die of anything, per se, you'd just stop being biology and start being physics."
Chill out there Dr. Manhattan.
felt that
Only if you are lucky enough to be close enough. Otherwise, you are for a slow-painful death.
everybody gangsta until you start breaking down at the molecular level
I see you know XKCD
Me: eating dinner
Kurzgesagt: here is your daily dose of anxiety
And fear
Thank you Kurzgesagt,Very cool!
+ depression
I mentally read that in the voice and tone of the Kurzgesagt narrator. It's funny, but do not recommend directly after watching this.
same
who is here after watching Cristopher Nolan's openheimer in imax
👇
I'd be haunted if I was Oppenheimer
How to survive a nuclear weapon:
Be the cameraman
Androx that’s a noice from me
Skeleton Masher agreed that’s godly
Stonks
SleepyBoy CS lol
Skeleton Masher r/wooosh
“What if we nuke a city”
Japan: If?
This is worse. The little boy and fat man were sloppy and were literally just
“We have big bomb we want test it”
Gray Lindblad I mean not really. More like we don’t want to invade mainland Japan.
Rubixia I mean it is really. Then what is the point of using two different type of bombs? It is nothing but testing and showing how “strong” you are. Just use the same bomb you tested if it is not testing.
Japan: First time?
Murasaki Budou Japan always fought till the end no matter what they do. That’s why you don’t want to invade main land Japan it was a test and yes it was to show how strong they are but the war would just go on if we didn’t do that.
I Must say, the music really helps to show just how terrifying such a scenario is.
Brilliant video. Insightful and terrifying at the same time well done.
the best thing to do when you get inside go lowest remember the fallout will plate out on the roof what you want to do stay aslow as you canin the base ment get against the basement wall gosh I wish I could draw a picture of a house, when your'e against the wall sit on the floorremember the fallout is possibly on the ground out side even with the actual ground level getting below ground level is best.move beds into the basement,maybe I should do a video on what to do next: it's too much in formation to type in a comment space.
Kurzgesagt: “What if we...”
Everyone not wanting an existential crisis: “ *N O* “
Kurzgesagt is a German word
LETS NUKE ANIME FANBOYS SICK OF ANIME PFP AND AHEGAO SWEATERS, LETS NUKE WHO EVER MADE MANGA AND ANIME
LET USE ALL OUR NUKES TO NUKE JAPAN, ITS WHAT THEY DESERVE FOR MAKING ANIME
lol
@@fichcaksksks2704 Hot take incoming: Anime would never exist if Japan wasn't nuked in WW2.
"Hey, that cloud looks like a car"
"That one looks like a dog"
"And that one looks like a mushroo-"
Actually that was pretty fun
HAHAHAH
Thats a good comment.
More accurate version
"Hey, that cloud looks like a car"
"That one looks like a dog"
"a- AAAA HELP I SAW A FLASH OF LIGHT NOW IM BLIND HELP HE- AAAAAAAAAA THE WINDOW SHATTERED THERES LOTS OF GLASS SHARDS STUCK IN MY BO- WAIT WHAT IM DEAF? I CANT HEAR ANYTHI- AAA ITS SO PAINFUL JESUS THERES A PUDDLE OF BLOOD UNDER ME IM GONNA DIE SOO- **passes out**"
**dies moments after, later his body gets burned and turned into coal**
**his friends that escaped start vomiting and die of radiation soon after their skin starts peeling away**
Username checks out
Can't believe it's been 4 years since this gem... is it weird that that makes me feel old? XD (I'm soon to be 18 at the time of writing this)
Lol, old?
No, it's not weird. 4 years is the length of HS. That is a long time for you. Now, at 43, 3-4 years feels like 1 used to. Seriously.
You won't notice it much until about your mid 30s. Then ... ZANG!
Wow, I was older than u are now on 9/11. Sorry, I just can't sleep and was already ruminating about age and time, and your comment struck me as so innocent and sweet.
You need not ever feel weird or defective or whatever over your own feelings. NEVER.
I lost 30,000 men in a blink of an eye. And the world just fckn watched.
“What if we nuked a city?”
10 minutes later:
“How to unpress charges against you”
How to get off watchlist
10 minutes later
“What if FBI is on our channel?”
First, a flash, everyone in this channel have a a massive bang from their door.
Meaning everywhere your house is now filled with armoured men.
I guess that person is paying all the Insurance to $900,000,00
Just by doing it
“Mankind invented the atomic bomb, but no mouse would invent a mousetrap.”
- Albert Einstein
If the mice were competing for food, you bet your ass they would want to make a mousetrap.
@@348joey quite a gut u have to challenge Einstein....nice logic tho
"I know not what weapons world war 3 will be fought with, but world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones"
-also einstein
@@348joey you wouldn't have anymore food after a nuclear blast 😂
@@jackryan2612 so true
Imagine you left that city with your family, days later, you turn on the TV and realize how *fucking insane* your luck was.
US government to Oppenheimer:
using nukes follows a simple procedure... the one who shoots first dies second
MAD.
Underrated
r/i’mnot14butthat’sdeep
*USA and Japan have joined the chat*
@@HoangPham-wp9gu with modern nukes yes... the fallout dust and debrie would be big enough for global winter
To quote from the movie “War Games”, “The only way to win is not to play...”.
You're already playing. Chess mate.
Andrew Rakos Check Mate
You can win a thermonuclear war, depending on what your goal is and who your enemy is.
@@pXnTilde chess mate
"Strange game...."
"I believe we did"
Still scary 3 years later. I learnt years ago that my little coastal town had at one time, or maybe still has 4 missiles aimed at it. Hopefully if it happens, we go quick.
Smh you really think they would aim 4 missiles at some random town instead of things like New York, London, Toronto, Istanbul or litterally any other large cities in the world
@@Ocoro_Depends on the town really. & 4 missiles ain't nothing to militaries out to fight wars. They're looking to fire such things at least in the hundreds in just a single year after all.
@@Ocoro_ we are a deep water harbour, so all those big US ships use to refuel at, so in the cold era. Pretty strategic to wipe a line like that.
And also NYC, would only need one massive bomb to wipe out a chunk of the densely populated city like that. For example.
@@Graehaus Fair enough, sorry if I seemed aggressive I had a really bad day I think
Better to have 4 weapons aimed at your city than none.
"Hey ferb I know what we are going to do today"
@Matthew Ren XD
Excuse me 😳
Wait, where's Perry?
@@randomanimations8488 gone
@@Quitbit Just like the whole city
I’m glad you included the idiots who’s first thoughts are to take photos
What else am i gonna do? Save the city?
It is not stupid... That's ten best thing you can do for information etc... To show it to the rest of the world
I mean it would be a historical event so why not
Death is inevitable. Why not record it for future generations?
Yeah lol I would hide behind a concrete wall or anything sturdy
Decided to re-watch this after Oppenheimer
Who's here after Oppenheimer?
"What if we Nuke a City?"
People watching this in 2020: [Softly] _Dont._
Isn't this stolen?
I dunno
@@squiddy9233 ?
@@nuyavang I dunno I've seen like 16 of these comments
So yeah I really dunno
@@squiddy9233 oh-
Wasn't there a explosion in a town in 2020?
"hey ferb i know what we're gonna do today"
*softly* _don't._
Haha I see funny mushro- OH MY GOD
R/cursedcomment
oh god no
Yoo😂😂😂😂
‘Pressure’ - works good for democracy, but not so well for dictatorship
One of the best and important videos I have ever watched
“The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five.”
― Carl Sagan
One of the better quotes of our time
Thats a good quote
Had to go quite far down the comments for some rationality. Thanks.
That is actually bullshit. America would survive a nuclear attack on russia if they don't return the favor
@@cheesecake667 Both would survive, but the government, infrastructure and populations would be beyond repair.
Tens to hundreds of millions will die on both sides, even in the best case scenario, it's a pyrrhic victory.
2018: "What If You Detonated a Nuclear Bomb in the Marianas Trench?"
2019: "What if We Nuke a City?"
2020: "What if we Started a Nuclear arms War?"
2021: "What if we Started a Global Slaughter of Billions with Nuclear Bombs?"
2022: "Presuade us not to launch these Nukes"
Lol
2023: "How to survive nuclear winter"
2023: "whoops!"
Dio's Stand 2024 : How to survive when all civilization is collapsed
How to burrow through to the bottom of the earth's crust.
In Hiroshima, they did restore the railway and get in some supplies and help in 48 hours. But that is also because, there was some practice in responding to firebombing of cities. The problem is, if you survived the blast you need to get as far away as possible, as soon as possible. The radiation damage is cumulative.
The bomb described here is a 100x more powerful than the ones dropped on Hiroshima.
Weird that this gets recommended to me after watching Oppenheimer
"OH cool, a new Kurzgesagt video!"
9 mins later: "I need to hug my children."
Ely Sanchez What children? They were sacrificed to appease the nuke gods and save us all
Nihilism and Existentialism is all part of the process of the ubermench
@@alexandrealferan7144 dude Wtf lmao
Ely Sanchez fuck I made the same joke sorta :(.
Ely Sanchez excuse me, you are an introvert at 3AM watching a kurzgesagt video on nukes, I know for a fact that u do not have children
I'm not worried, I own a fridge.
Bas Waaijer Indiana Jones?
@@meikelwupp7044 Yes!
I thought this was a fallout 4 reference about billy the kid ghoul.
ControllerLoner That stemmed from Indiana Jones
Bas Waaijer I also do
The problem here, is the threat of mutually assured destruction is enough to stave off some who would otherwise be more inclined to drop them in the first place.
This is why simply saying "Nukes are bad, destroy all of them..." doesn't work. If everyone agreed to do it, but then some of the more notorious leaders didn't, but everyone else did, there's no threat to prevent them from using them.
Removing your strongest weapons from the table without being able to ensure everyone else actually does it to won't help anyone, it will lead only to destruction of those who follow it.
I think it's actually impossible to get rid of all nukes. people don't trust each other at all to not have them.
That's always been the issue among nations. Until nations put ink to paper for treaties and alliances, iron clad agreements of non-aggression, and work to maintain amicable relations, the threat of war is always there. It may be low in modern times, but it's a non-zero number. And given how tensions all across the world are rising, externally and internally, the idea of demilitarizing and denuclearizing is as unappealing as ever. We're on the cusp of a potential WWIII, everyone can see it. All it takes is that first spark.
As the saying goes, it's better to have a weapon and not use it, than to need a weapon and not have it. And unfortunately, this is our best method of preventing WWIII.
@@vallahdsacretor4839 "iron clad agreements of non-aggression" - Unfortunately, this is never going to be possible. Even if you 'had' a treaty that forbade any kind of aggression on a global scale, it doesn't actually 'prevent' those things from taking place.
Russia/Ukraine is a classic example. Russia has breached numerous geneva conventions, including attacking civilian medical facilties. But how do you enforce that, beyond through military force?
@@Grigeral You furthered your original point but likely not in the way you thought. The Ukrainians agreed to relinquish the Soviet-era warheads left on their soil after the USSR fell with the understanding that they would not face Russian aggression or have any chance of becoming a NATO signatory (to avoid encircling / threatening Russian territory).
The West in the years since then actively screwed them over by continuing to make overtures and flirt with the idea of bringing them into the EU and/or NATO, and even had a hand in the 2014 coup that installed heavily anti-Russo politicians into power. While that doesn't excuse the invasion, it does show that giving up a potential nuclear deterrent paired with the manner of world policing statecraft that has become notorious over decades is a recipe for a nation caught in the middle to be at greater risk of attack.
@@The_Lucent_Archangel it was more a hypothetical argument I was making on how you enforce something when you have nothing to back it up.
What you're raising is a whole other argument. My stance on that, would be that Ukraine is not a part of Russia. As such, Russia have zero say over who Ukraine have dealings with, be it NATO or otherwise, whether they like it or not.
It might justify the war in the eyes of Russian officials, but that's pretty much it. They have no control over them, so have don't have rights like they seem to believe.
There are a number of variables not discussed here. The yield of the nuke is the biggest one and how many tall buildings, and how tall, are in the blast area is another big variable.
Even if we nuke the city ,the cameraman will still survive
The cameraman *always survives.*
But not unless it’s a movie
@@otokonara706 no there isnt
What an original joke. Haven’t heard this one before.
bruhtastic give it a rest dude CZcams is full of unoriginal comments. People are just joking around
"Why would you want to get rid of humanity's most powerful weapon?"
"I just have a really deep, primal passion for existing."
The best game to play is choosing where you are in the city when the blast happens, do you want to stop existing in a nanosecond, burn alive in several seconds, be annihilated by forceful winds, shattered infrastructure, and tornado expulsions, or slowly die in the outskirts after being abandoned
sorry the 1 world Government which Burns California Australia has other ideas Tick Tock 2021
cant relate
Once you get rid of nuclear weapons it's back to having large standing armies so say goodbye to non mandatory military service. Nuclear weapons ironically made peace possible( because the leaders know they're also in the cross hairs now, or at least collateral if those start flying, unlike before when they could be sipping tea while your father/brother/husband/son would be bleeding to death in a ditch somewhere.
"And I don't understand that the crazy people alluded to in this video won't be deterred by my better angels."
If you can get a propane tank filled with liquid hydrogen to stay cool with liquid nitrogen you can use a tattoo removal laser for a triggering mechanism and have an explosive that reaches nuclear sometimes; like a "sometimes nuke". Not a huge radius.
There was a TV movie about the explosion of a small nuke in Charleston SC. The mention in this video of the blizzard of sharp glass was seen later in the show, when a newswoman kneels down to pick glass out of the back of a coworker.
*“This item was too Overpowered to be in the game, so we removed it.”*
VenularSilver this comment right here officer
Notch apples lul
R.I.P Fallout 76! The 76th game in the franchise. Died from script kitties and try hards nuking new players. OOF
tierzoo is that you?
nice lol
In fact, Oppenheimer already did it.
Thank you! I am currently doing research for a novella I'm writing that takes place after a devastating nuclear war, but with a heavy focus on realism, no cut corners. I won't nuke anything, but I won't BS my way through it either.
This is not well known in foreign countries, but the number of victims in Hiroshima and Nagasaki continues to increase year by year, and that has exceeded 520,000 so far.
This is because deaths from diseases due to exposure are also counted.
“What if we nuke a city”
America: *what if we nuke two*
yung not a nuke
Japan will surrender
America did the right thing.
North korea: What if we nuked *ourselves*
A bombs aint nuclear
Short answer: death
Long answer: D e a t h
Longer answer: D e a t h c o r e
Longer answer : M e g a D e a t h
Longer answer: D E S T R U C T I O N 1 0 0
Longer answer: Homo sapiens located within the blast radius, regardless of gender, will be completely obliterated and will cease life function.
Jesus taught that the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is seminal ejaculation! The super elite that run this world are hybrid demons that look human but need sperm to survive! They created Hollywood and Porn and many other pawns to achieve this evil. Seminal ejaculation is why G-d sent the flood to destroy the people in Noah’s day. And now G-d will send Fire to destroy the USA and the world. The USA is the 2nd beast from revelations. The 7 churches are the bodies 7 chakras. Jesus taught these things including reincarnation and karma but the Pope with the Catholic Church rewrote and perverted. Remember to have a true relationship with G-d is to not ever ejaculate the sperm for it creates and draws demons to men! The point of sex is not ejaculation for it is the sin that got Adam cast out of eden. The point is to do work of Abraham to escape this cycle of reincarnation and the evil one Yaldabaoth who in Greek is Cronos. All religions come from Christ for Abraham Buddha Vishnu Thoth Hermes would tell you this. Please read the pistis Sophia. Gnostic teachings online. Gnostic gospels. The perfect Matrimony and the book of revelations.
Now I've become death the destroyer of worlds
just watched oppenheimer, it makes me even sadder...
Select weapon:
Tank
Airplane
[ Extinction ball ]
Pacific showdown
Fatality
FINISH HIM
Nagasaki- extinction ball 2: electric boogaloo
I see what you did there :)
What an animation and your coverage 🥶
Can you let us know who composes your music? Absolutely loved it.
Kurzgesagt: The forces of man are laughable compared to the forces of nature.
Also Kurzgesagt: A nuclear bomb is every natural disaster combined
XDDDD
... for a small surface on Earth. If the scale is Earth sized everything is microscopic
I mean, you do realize that no matter what damage we cause to the earth it will never be enough to actually permanently damage the earth itself. Even a nuclear bomb is nothing compared to mother nature. Yeah we get to see the effects that are caused, and yes we can see the damage, but when we are all dead and the earth is still rotating, it will heal itself. You just won't see it. The way he said this statement is confusing, but only if you don't understand how the Earth's ecosystem works.
@@LeviathanTechWiz very well said
@Oscar Burner I know right, I mean don't get me wrong I know that even though nuclear weapons are the "most destructive force on Earth" it's really only temporary. Humans always seem to find a way to make things "bigger" or "better" or even make new technologies but in actuality they just digging their graves even further down. I mean don't get me wrong having technologies that will keep our enemies at bay is nice, but when you notice that is just a veiled threat of safety due to "mutually assured destruction" but really millions will die just by one bomb being launched. Cascade effect. I know I am going on a tyrade, but if we could just focus our scientific knowledge on improving how to better our lives, not destroy them, then I'll be very happy.
“World leaders threatening each other with the destruction of civilian’s lives”
A classic
I could only count 2, and gladly one is no longer "world leader"
Why not just have them (the leaders themselves) fist fight?
Well said
USA did it. The only country that did it.
The most frightening point of this video is the fact that "all the cruel phenomena described in this video actually took place on two separate occasions in the past."
All we can do is to prevent it from happening again in the future, forever.
The problem with eliminating nuclear weapons is there is no way to guarantee that the other guy has as well.
How many existential crisis videos do we need?
Kurzgesagt: Yes
also cgp grey with humans need not apply
Kurzgesagt: Alle
This is not existential video, more like disaster preparedness and advocacy.
fear mongering
Go check Mutually Assured Destruction. Any country that uses nuclear weapon risks being nuked itself.
So while its true that if ISIS or someone thats just completely suicidal gets their hands on nuke would be bad, nukes are also what is stopping many wars from happening.
US is never going to attack Russia with nukes because it would mean they are both going to get destroyed.
Also people that are just batshit crazy aren't going to care about any agreement, they will build their own nuke if they want and then be the only ones with the nuke.
This is just dumb in my opinion to get rid of them
Waiter: Sir, your serving of existential fear is ready.
Me: Ahhh, finally.
mere seconds later : *Screaming sounds*
Nothing like a discussion about the effects of a fatal dose of instant sunshine to make you bright and chipper in the morning.
Replace easier with CZcams
Yeah kurzgesagt is good at that lol
Look on the bright side, if it ever does happen and you're close enough to the blast zone it'll be the quickest death you could ever possibly hope for. I don't think you'd even have time to register the pain before you vaporise, let alone have the time to scream.
The thing is that we’ve already done it twice
it is terrifying what humans are capable of
Kurzgesagt: **makes an interesting video**
Also Kurzgesagt: Let's make everyone feel uncomfortable
You should feel uncomfortable about nuclear weapons.
Everyone murders descendant in USA...
Aniexity channel published a new video
@@DevenSeenath
...
...
_daga, kotowaru_
It s a real threat to humanity. We should feel uncomfortable.
"few minutes later, those who survived will envy the dead"
That's the scariest part for me. I'd rather evaporate in milliseconds than suffer next few hours.
If i survive , I will kill my self :/
That profile picture makes you look like a pedophile.
This is nothing but fear propaganda nonsense. Nukes are fake af. If they were real, Nagasaki and Heroshima would be uninhabitable for 10,000 years.... THINK for yourself ffs.
Or days or weeks or months ugh this made me so sad
Same. I'd consider myself luckiest in such a setting, when i'm caught in ground zero, as even being hundreds of kilometers away, free from whatever shit such an explosion would bring, there's still the fallout, radioactively, socially & politically, to deal with for years, if not decades, to come. Just about the entire world would be turned into a shithole within years, with the constant threat of yet another such explosion happening anywhere, anytime.
I’m loving how this was narrated.
Can we talk a how great the animation is??
Phase 1: "In a millisecond, a ball of plasma hotter than the sun appears; everyone evaporates or becomes blind and is set on fire".
Phase *_one_*
Its not just hotter that the sun.. Its the Hottest thing in the Universe aside from Big Bang.. Its when Atoms split, now this is something insane.. It can be Trillions of times hotter than sun..
@@thelasttenno5450 I looked it up after watching this man a blast frome a nuke can be up to 1000000 degrees CELSIUS
@@thelasttenno5450
What about the entire universe being compressed into a single planck volume and then being split
@The Last Tennos that is actually incorrect. The super hadron collider can generate temperatures of 5.5 trillion degrees Celsius, which is way hotter than a nuclear blast.
Nuclear blasts only reach about 83 million degrees Celsius.
Phases of a Nuclear Explosion
Phase 1: Everybody Dies
Phase 2: Everybody Dies
Phase 3: Everybody Dies
Haha true :)))
Not actually they suffer and then die in phase 3
Phase 4 : everyone dies in a longer period of time
S08E22
This video makes all the 11/3 Seattle predictive programming examples even crazier.
I tried to watch this video years ago, and stopped a few minutes in because of how horrific it was. I was just now able to watch it all the way through, but am still crying.
We could be talking to good friends and family across the world, having a good time, trying to figure out our differences and healing pains and drama, connecting with other people, as people. Loved ones, friends, family, anybody...
And suddenly never hear from them again.
And not know anything until the world starts talking about it.
People we knew and loved just gone... because people can't be trusted with these things.
After the "Beirut Explosion" don’t give 2020 any ideas
Want to know what's terrifying? The Beirut Incident was only about ~20% the scale and power of the bomb dropped in Hiroshima.
Just 1/5th. Watch the video again and remember the first ever nuclear bomb used against a city was 5 times bigger.
That explosion only killed around 100 people and had no nuclear fallout. i mean theres videos from like a few blocks away of people surviving with no injuries. its still horrible but absolutely nothing compared to what our nuclear warheads are capable of today. If russia dropped the tsar bomba in times square new york, it would instantly evaporate the whole island of Manhattan along with around 2 million people in around 1 second. with around another 1 million dieing within a few days from surrounding regions. now thats just one, consider the fact the russia has atleast 1,600 active nuclear weapons that they can fire pretty much all together at once, and thats enough to totally annihilate atleast a quarter of the entire U.S at once. now consider that the U.S also has around the same amount and can do just as much damage back to russia. hundreds of millions will die within a single day.
@@TheMaster5059 90km away we had broken windows so yes for a small country like lebanon is big explosion
People who are spreading conspiracies about the Beirut explosion being a nuke are seriously underestimating the danger nuclear weapons pose.
And somehow now it makes sense why we aren't forcing nations to disarm, most people are just so ignorant of the sheer existential horror nukes pose.
I'm hoping more people like you are navigating here and realise just how destructive human can be.
Jason Borshchik
The death number has risen to 200 tho