Every Reference Point Of The Rolex Submariner (From 1953 to 2020)
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 09. 2020
- Designer Notes Subject 34
The Rolex Submariner is the quintessential dive watch that every one either aspire to get or out do. To get to where it is now, Rolex had to make countless changes and improvements to this flagship product. In this video we’ll dive into every reference point and the design features of every model in the history of the Rolex submariner.
References:
6204
6200
6205
6536
6538
5508
5510
5512
5513
1680
5514
16800
16803
16808
168000
16610
16613
16618
14060
14060M
16610LV
16610T
116610
116619LB
116618LN
116618LB
116610LV
116613LB
116613LN
114060
126610LN
126610LV
126618LB
126618LN
126619LB
126613LB
126614LN
124060
#RolexSubmariner #Rolex #HistoryOfSubmariner - Jak na to + styl
Best review of the Submariner and his story, ever. Thanks a lot!
Glad you enjoyed it!
I’m becoming obsessed with your videos. This is some of the most impressive work I’ve ever seen. What a labor of love!
Thank you so much. That means a lot really.
I dont like when the maxi case get too wide!...anyone feel the same?
Thanks for the research and outstanding presentation.
Most underrated CZcams video ever! Loved it!
Best watch information video I have ever seen 🙌
Great job! Absolutely love this video! Very informative. Thanks for putting in all the hard work making it.
Great work
Thankyou for this!
Glad you like it.
Thanks for putting this together. Great work ❤
I need to update this actually.
James bond gave Rolex the biggest showing ,after that everyone wanted a Rolex. Very clever marketing they both needed each other and it was a very successful marriage
Yes indeed. This genius marketing endures to this day.
Thank you so very much for such informative work
Glad it was helpful!
Serious piece of work Sir. 🙏🏻
I could do better but im satisfied how this one turned out.
Excellent review!
Thank you sir!
Complete and concise review! Outstanding
Well we’ve had a refresh since. I may need to update this again.
The Engraved Rehaut, you state that it was introduced on the 116610, along with the cerochrom bezel. I have a (2008) 16610T it also has the engraved rehaut (as does the kermit you show in your video).
Great video though, I never knew mine was a 16610T, just had assumed it was a 16610. It as you mentioned, does not have the lug holes drilled right through.
One of the best vids on the submariner I’ve seen. Keep it going! Maybe some other Rolex models?
Thanks. Maybe for the 1000 subs ill do another one. Which model would you like to see?
I’m thinking a series on the op or maybe the gmt too. With the quality of your vids you are going to get big!
Wow.. Nice
salamat po!
Just bought my first 124060
Great vid. One note on the Smurf, I think usually the two tone is referred to as the bluesy
Correct. I need to update this video. It’s been ages.
That was an education, 🙏.
Glad it helps. I might need to update this video though.
Amazing video ^)
I feel so much smarter now. Now I feel more ready to go buy one. All I need now is the money...............
Like we all do.
@@DesignAtelier when you have the money you still cant buy one :(
@@lordlanust9421 yes that is sad. I don’t mind being in a waiting list at this point so long as I know I’ll get it one day. But now you’re not even guaranteed that.
I thought a key evolution in the latest sub was a departure from the maxi-case with the overly squared thick lugs. Do I have this wrong?
I don't know why I just love the hulk......
Why the modern submariner without date complication is not called turnograph?
That we may never know.
Guys I never owned a Sub, yet I have a JC and SD43. A friend is proposing to swap my tritium SD from 1995 full set, with his 5513 from 1989. Is it a good idea ? Should I pay him any differential cash ?!
It’s hard to decide without seeing the condition. Both are exceptional watches. Owning two sea dwellers is not bad and you don’t need to own a sub per se.
Good pictures, but to many mistakes
Yup a bit of mistakes. Might redo this video one day.
Hi, i own a 1680 from 1978. If your information was accurate, my watch should not exist???