Her description by example was divine but having the simple graphics to pin the basics down while she walked through it is wonderful. I hope that you will please release more of your excellent work with her.
Was I the only one who laughed at these children? hmmm, what does this mean? If only all little girls in our world could watch this. After-all, relationships begin with our parents/caretakers as our role models. And everything gets a tiny bit easier with the understanding of how we are drawn to certain partners. What a great intro to the Oedipal Complex, thanks, Nancy.
How would Oedipal process work if the children’s parents died before age 3-5, as many pre/boomer generations experienced? And in single mom parent families. And what about children raised in institutions (non family environments?). Fraud’s theories seemed very nuclear family based, and assumed demonstrated love/affection between two parents present. But PDA was also rare. Thank you. I love your talks.
It seems to me like a lot of fundamentally unprovable just-so explanations. Actually something I struggle very much with in freudian psych, and to be honest, to a much lesser degree with psychology as a whole. In the interest of expanding my horizons, do you have reading/watching suggestions to explain why, in your opinion, that is not the case? i.e. why I should believe that, of all possible explanations we can come up with that would broadly make sense, this one is correct.
I understand the skepticism surrounding this theory; I felt the same when I began my psychiatry training. However, as I delved deeper into the literature (which, regrettably, is mostly in Dutch and thus hard to recommend), I started seeing these patterns in my patients and in children at various developmental stages, which really bolstered my confidence in its validity. If you're interested, Glen Gabbard's books are a good resource, though they can be somewhat dry.
You can't understand any of that if you haven't experienced it firsthand. These are theories that only make sense if you have a point of reference. Psychotherapy is not mathematics.
Gotta love Dr.McWilliams, her book on diagnosis is a masterpiece
Way to go getting to talk to her and recording her. Her explanations are so profound yet also so simply put and utterly sincere.
Her description by example was divine but having the simple graphics to pin the basics down while she walked through it is wonderful. I hope that you will please release more of your excellent work with her.
Was I the only one who laughed at these children? hmmm, what does this mean? If only all little girls in our world could watch this. After-all, relationships begin with our parents/caretakers as our role models. And everything gets a tiny bit easier with the understanding of how we are drawn to certain partners. What a great intro to the Oedipal Complex, thanks, Nancy.
Nancy rules
@@PsychoFarm I don't watch her often, but when I do, I always learn something.
Respect. Thanks for this!
How would Oedipal process work if the children’s parents died before age 3-5, as many pre/boomer generations experienced? And in single mom parent families. And what about children raised in institutions (non family environments?). Fraud’s theories seemed very nuclear family based, and assumed demonstrated love/affection between two parents present. But PDA was also rare. Thank you. I love your talks.
great video!!
Not Jim and Pam 🤣
This is psychopharm exactly how... ?
it shows how people get to a moment when they need pharmaceutics and psychotherapy XD
Dude is this you talking to Dr. McWilliams?
It is 😎
amazing
Congrats!
I have not idea how that hung together as an accurate description.
:(
ok big budgettttt
It seems to me like a lot of fundamentally unprovable just-so explanations. Actually something I struggle very much with in freudian psych, and to be honest, to a much lesser degree with psychology as a whole. In the interest of expanding my horizons, do you have reading/watching suggestions to explain why, in your opinion, that is not the case? i.e. why I should believe that, of all possible explanations we can come up with that would broadly make sense, this one is correct.
You should try an ISTDP therapist. This usually will come out in a very unmistakeable manner.
I understand the skepticism surrounding this theory; I felt the same when I began my psychiatry training. However, as I delved deeper into the literature (which, regrettably, is mostly in Dutch and thus hard to recommend), I started seeing these patterns in my patients and in children at various developmental stages, which really bolstered my confidence in its validity. If you're interested, Glen Gabbard's books are a good resource, though they can be somewhat dry.
You can't understand any of that if you haven't experienced it firsthand. These are theories that only make sense if you have a point of reference. Psychotherapy is not mathematics.
Maybe nuclear family is a quite bad idea to raise children in, in the first place? 😆 thank you for a very interesting interview.☺
A psychoanalyst using anecdotal evidence and unscientific inductive reasoning, per usual
these dr's are weird
People are weird, its just that some people cant accept the weird parts of our existence.
Great 👍 conversation.. funny the little 😄 girl ..wanted married her daddy. Cute!!
😂😂😂😂😂😂