for those wondering: the show version does have the 4-lets in those 5/4 measures, but the measures are actually 4/4, with the 4-lets being a 4:3 polyrhythm on the first 3 beats
@@Iplayquad you can have a polyrhythm of any ratio you want, and if you look at the amount of time the 4 lets take up you would see it is actually 4:4. There are 4 4 lets in the same amount of time as 4 quarter notes, hence 4:4 polyrhythm. If they only lasted 3 quarter notes then it would be 4:3, and 4:5 if they lasted the whole 5/4 bar. The entire point of the comment was that it was a stupid notation since 4:4 is the same thing as quarter notes. If you dont believe me, just count quarter notes during the 4 lets, they are the same thing in this instance.
This makes no sense in terms of your description or metrical orthography. If the bracketed 'fourlets' (your term) are truly equally spread over three quarter notes, than the measure is actually a 4/4 measure, as there is only one additional quarter note in that bar - and not two additional quarter notes. If the 'fourlets' are actually simply quarter notes without the bracketed indication, then it is indeed a 5/4 bar. It's one, or it's the other. The same thing applies to the (supposed) 4/4 bar you notate in bar fifteen - if the bracketed 'fourlets' are truly spread evenly over three quarter notes, it is actually a 3/4 bar. If the 'fourlets' are actually simply quarter notes without the bracketed indication, then it is indeed a 4/4 bar. It's one, or it's the other.
@@juneyellowsnek Ignoring your ignorance and fear of correct musical language, I actually wrote verbatim "... If the bracketed 'fourlets' (your term) are truly equally spread over three quarter notes, than the measure is actually a 4/4 measure...". This means the similar 4/4 bars are ALSO misnotated, and should be 3/4 bars. So it's poorly notated on multiple points. Cry me a river.
for those wondering: the show version does have the 4-lets in those 5/4 measures, but the measures are actually 4/4, with the 4-lets being a 4:3 polyrhythm on the first 3 beats
*quadruplets
@@ruler255shut up
@@ruler255*4lets
Nobody cares past triplet bro
i like the use of quartuplets to make a 4:4 polyrhythm, plain quarter notes are too simplistic.
Hungry Pretzel thank you
Eeeven though the version they played is actually a 4:3 polyrhythm
Its not a 4:4 what..? Thats not a thing. You mean 4:3? 4 lets are a 4:3 tuplet ratio. Just like triplets are a 3:2 tuplet ratio..
@@Iplayquad you can have a polyrhythm of any ratio you want, and if you look at the amount of time the 4 lets take up you would see it is actually 4:4. There are 4 4 lets in the same amount of time as 4 quarter notes, hence 4:4 polyrhythm. If they only lasted 3 quarter notes then it would be 4:3, and 4:5 if they lasted the whole 5/4 bar. The entire point of the comment was that it was a stupid notation since 4:4 is the same thing as quarter notes. If you dont believe me, just count quarter notes during the 4 lets, they are the same thing in this instance.
@@Pretzel3567 yes but in the actual music of Jagged Line its 4:3
0:05
Yes that is indeed when the music starts, good job figuring that out
@@BlazinInfernape maybe he wanted a timestamp if he was playing along
Hey Logan you are first chair ahs I know you personally
@@6destroyer9boi99 like a Bearcat? 🦍
thank you for the transcription!
I know it says fortississimo (fff) but it really doesn't sound like it. (Not sure if you lowered the master volume though.
I’m not entirely sure honestly
Big annoyance to players when arrangers put too many "f"s..."fake forte" we call it.
This makes no sense in terms of your description or metrical orthography. If the bracketed 'fourlets' (your term) are truly equally spread over three quarter notes, than the measure is actually a 4/4 measure, as there is only one additional quarter note in that bar - and not two additional quarter notes. If the 'fourlets' are actually simply quarter notes without the bracketed indication, then it is indeed a 5/4 bar. It's one, or it's the other. The same thing applies to the (supposed) 4/4 bar you notate in bar fifteen - if the bracketed 'fourlets' are truly spread evenly over three quarter notes, it is actually a 3/4 bar. If the 'fourlets' are actually simply quarter notes without the bracketed indication, then it is indeed a 4/4 bar. It's one, or it's the other.
Ignoring your big 'im smart' lingo for no reason, the bars in question are just a 4:3 4let in a 4/4 bar. It's just misnotated.
@@juneyellowsnek Ignoring your ignorance and fear of correct musical language, I actually wrote verbatim "... If the bracketed 'fourlets' (your term) are truly equally spread over three quarter notes, than the measure is actually a 4/4 measure...". This means the similar 4/4 bars are ALSO misnotated, and should be 3/4 bars. So it's poorly notated on multiple points. Cry me a river.
@@toddlevinjust wanted you to learn how to put it simply bro, didnt ask for your doctoral thesis. Save some pussy for the rest of us man holy shit
You didn't need the quadruplets you could've put quarter notes
It adds more emphasis on the notes
@@johnnybmusic9997 literally be quiet
@@marcmyt cope and seethe
@@johnnybmusic9997 bud its a 4:3. It could have been dotted 8ths not quarters or a 4:4. Its still a 4/4 measure you added too many notes
This is to easy compared to what us show style marchers have to play
You’re comparing apples to oranges. Both are good in a different way
show me what you have to play then
@@PeterGriffin-kb2hfbeginner level czcams.com/video/YNkLu1nWz5I/video.html
@@tikala1 I prefer titanfall
@@tikala1 look at the absolute ratio jose