Why Is The Universe The Same Everywhere?
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 06. 2024
- Researched and Written by Leila Battison
Narrated and Edited by David Kelly
Thumbnail Art by Ettore Mazza
If you like our videos, check out Leila's CZcams channel:
/ @somethingincredible
Music from Silver Maple, Epidemic Sound and Artlist.
Stock footage from Videoblocks.
References:
www.newscientist.com/definiti...
www.forbes.com/sites/startswi...
• Cosmic Inflation Expla...
bigthink.com/surprising-scien...
www.forbes.com/sites/startswi...
www.livescience.com/33129-tot...
physicstoday.scitation.org/do...
www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/...
www.uwa.edu.au/study/-/media/...
www.aanda.org/articles/aa/ful...
profmattstrassler.com/article...
www.newscientist.com/article/...
www.innovationnewsnetwork.com...
blogs.scientificamerican.com/...
www.forbes.com/sites/startswi...
physicstoday.scitation.org/do...
www.phy.princeton.edu//~stein...
astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/...
www.astronomynotes.com/cosmolg...
Image Credits:
NASA
Galaxy Filament By Andrew Pontzen and Fabio Governato - Andrew Pontzen and Hiranya Peiris, [www.ucl.ac.uk/mathematical-phy... illumination: what lights up the universe?], UCLA press release, 27 August 2014. flickr.com (high resolution version), CC BY 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
Observable Universe By Andrew Z. Colvin - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
Red Shift Map By Piquito veloz - This image was created with Celestia. Redshift lines is a free addon of Selden Ball&039;s Graticules and customized by DRJMOS for educational purpose., CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
Alan Guth By Betsy Devine aka Betsythedevine - Uploader&039;s Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
Amundsen Telescope South Pole By Ketiltrout - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index... Hawking By woodleywonderworks - www.flickr.com/photos/wwworks..., CC BY 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe
James M. Bardeen, Paul J. Steinhardt, and Michael S. Turner
Phys. Rev. D 28, 679 - Published 15 August 1983
Paul Steinhardt By Sleepy Geek - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
00:00 Introduction
05:14 Holes In The Big Bang
13:03 Alan Guth (Cosmic Inflation)
24:35 The Burden Of Proof
33:23 Heresy (Holes In Inflation)
Hello folks! Hope you enjoy it. Still working our way through the first trillionth of a second of existence. What a mad journey. Remember to check out Leila´s channel Something Incredible - top stuff right there. Thanks!
So much quality , thank you!
God speed mate
Seems like just about everything had happened by the time the universe was a second old, doesn't it?
Brilliant quality don’t give up. Next in a nutshell
@@AlecsNeo
Id
R?vv? Zip Z112?l oh no Liu
I know you create these for your own reasons, but i don't quite know how to express my admiration and appreciation for what you create beyond this simple monetary token to underscore the sincerity behind my my expression of love and gratitude for what you do.
I love your videos, your take, your style. You are appreciated, you are loved, and your impact goes for beyond what your CZcams dashboards can tell you.
Thank you.
This has become my favourite docu series and today is a good day
Like that annoying Halo ice cream commercial I see in every video on CZcams!
Yes a nice channel but this last video is more social-media-type dogmatism than true science !
@@kantanlabs3859 Why?
@@HistoryoftheUniverse i loved this, and cannot comment on the previous poster, but can offer a bit of feedback.
Some language is acceptable colloquially but can be considered loaded. "Divine inspiration", or "clinging to inflation". The first brings a religious tone into what has become a religion vs science trope. The latter posions the well.
Excellent excellent video for sure, just a little feedback.
@@nathanielmuller4400
Well said. I concur.
The best cosmology documentaries on CZcams- and better than most on television. Super well done in every way.
Another S class documentary.. my day has been made exponentially better
What do ppl mean when they say "S", I see ppl commenting just that letter...?
@@KimDrewTheLine it's a rating based on a ranking system similar to school grades. F, E, D, C, B, A, S. ... Cant remember if it has a meaning like, super, supreme, sensational , sublime but yeah, essentially when you see it, it means awesome.
Yes, also I'm exponentially confused
@@WatchfulBonsai doesn’t it mean satisfactory
@@WatchfulBonsai thank you!
This channel has way to few subscribers than it should have.. the quality of the content here is awesome
@@FutureBoyWonder no
Yes a nice channel but this last video is more social-media-type dogmatism than true science !
@@kantanlabs3859 no
@@kantanlabs3859 Planning on posting this on every comment?
@@HistoryoftheUniverse Truly sorry for this undeserved post, you do a fantastic job, love all your channels (History of the earth especially). My comments, except that one, are all laudatory. As a researcher in physics I get often emotionally upset to see modern theoretical physicists crap emphasized in an unbalanced manner by many CZcams channels. I refer to this as dark physics, you know; dark matter, dark energy, dark currents, wormholes and to some extent inflation. This comment was made before I reached the end of the video, were you address the problem in a more balanced manner. My following post was far more temperate, again my humble excuses.
BTW there is a very simple alternate explanation for the observed homogeneity of space-time, a variable speed of light, as proposed long ago by several physicists. You may think of the space-time (the space-time itself not-the matter it contains) as a substrate that is progressively cooling with time as it expends. In such a frame the speed of light is extremely large just after the big bang. This is a conjecture that respects the parsimony principle. The medias and a deviant part of the scientific community prefer of course something more spectacular.
By far the best documentary series in astro-physics and astronomy out there nowadays! I admire your work.. such depth, such informative science and so well-written! Gotta love it! Keep up the good work team, can't wait for your next episode..!:D
It good, but just relax.
@@morkusmorkus6040 no, he is right to say it is by far the best,
and I watched so many also agree this is very interesting
@@morkusmorkus6040 what did you get from leaving this comment lol. the og commenter doesn't care what a stranger thinks about their enthusiasm, cuz that would be weird to care about. so.. why would you assume they care that you're annoyed with their opinion. "just relax", or why don't you just go somewhere else. you can't control people or sway their behavior to fit your preferences. let them be as they are, since they have done nothing harmful. you have no right to come here with that attitude. ridiculous behavior on the internet i swear.
the perfect team of amazing writer and researcher, coupled with awesome ( British accent-mandatory narration, calming tone and cadence that won't put to sleep but prepares the listener for survival when mind is blown and reality takes over. I'm sure it took many minds and countless hours to make this, but it stands out above all the others available combined
Every single episode is just as mind-blowing as the previous. The way you lay out the time line of the narrative feels so engaging. Great stuff throughout.
I really like h the e poetic, expressive way the two series (history of Earth and universe) are written, and the soothing way it is edited. It gives such great, daunting existential crises some delicate and quaint charm.
I find History of the Earth to have a better brand identity. I think its opening is just hard to compete with, and the early episodes were just full of so much emotion.
History of the Universe is suitably, calmer, there's less passion, and is more observatory.
I thought you were talking about Hubble at the beginning, and with all the news about it possibly being dead I was wondering you'd mention that. But you were in fact talking about the Blubble telescope on the otherside of the universe. Hopefully we can fix our own!
Great name choice
Hypothesis about the big bang could be wrong!!!
@@HistoryoftheUniverse Next video?
@@frankdimeglio8216
t is fully, CLEARLY, and consistently proven. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. "
No, and it is disproved by reality. Get a clue.
@@frankdimeglio8216 wrong
As a lover of Cosmology narration, this has been beyond incredible. Thank you
😂
meee tooooooooo
I've seen a lot of science/cosmology channels and this is one of the best. I love the writing, narration, and the music too. Great job! 👍
Just started this video for the thousandth time and CZcams decided to ask me to rate ur comment. Asked was it good. I gave you the best rating my friend! Ur awesome random person
@@whocares2214 thanks yo. It's probably bc i sometimes post contentious comments on political videos.
@@thersten lmfao I feel ya. I do too but people don't like to hear truth sometimes or find out that they've been lied to every time they look at the news....lol.
@@whocares2214 oh. are you one of those anti mainstream journalism conspiracy theorists?
@@thersten its not a conspiracy tho. Most news channels lie. I'm just getting back from work and I'm going to sleep but I'll elaborate later
Leila is an amazing writer. 🤯🥳
What a blessing to be taught by a scientst and artist combined as a teacher too.
It's just one person who writes ever script? That's crazy. What's her degree? I'm assuming something astronomy related.
@@GameTimeWhy yeah
I just occurred to me.. If light extremely slowly lost momentum through interaction with spacetime or some other mechanism then we would be absolutely clueless about how fast the universe is expanding it it could very very possibly solve some issues with Dark energy and Dark matter.
Every time I watch these videos I'm once again amazed at the production quality and TV documentary style narration. Like it could literally be put on TV as is, and it would be seen as a production on par with the documentaries of the late 90's and early 2000's on channels like discovery.
This is absolutely amazing piece of science and art in perfect proportions. And I must say: you really, really know which emerging trends in current cutting edge science to highlight. And it's great.
What's a better word than great in English? If such word exists, it describes both of your channels (History of Universe and Earth).
extraordinary
@@spacedawg3599 yes, exactly, thanks! :)
It’s simple. The universe began everywhere at once. Every distant point was once together into a singular point so its fair to say that anywhere and everywhere is the center of the universe. The expansion of space happens equally at all points in space because all points in space are the center of the universe.
There still has to be an "outside" where there is nothing.
nope. the universe doesn't require any "outside". you can say the universe is expanding into a higher dimensional space a space which would need 10 extra dimensions. the catch is that this embedding space is unobservable and unprovable so there is no rational to think it exists in the first place. the universe is weird and under no obligation to make sense to us humans.
I'm going through a really rough time these days so I'm going back and re-watching these in my free time.
By far the best, most honest and comprehensive treatment of this subject outside the halls of academia. Not to mention artistic, poetic and visually appealing. Well done!
First there was Cosmos - A Personal Journey which was amazing, and now this. So informative, so entertaining and not one miss. Bravo
When you think of how much we've discovered since the industrial revolution, it's truly astonishing.
hi how are you
Too bad it's all confiscated.
Turok, Penrose, and a handful of other prominent cosmologists don’t accept Guth’s inflation theory. Their counter theories shouldn’t be ignored.
Cosmologist sounds so much better than Astronomer (and is more accurate)
Yep they do disagree but I have to admit that they disagree with a vengeance which some times comes across as sour grapes. Whilst I certainly agree that inflation can be wrong, the current state in which the cosmic background radiation fit the inflation model (Microwave Anisotrophy as a function of angle) so well, does give it some credibility though a long way to go. The other models have to many holes right now (like branes bouncing etc which again cannot be proved in any way) and until we do not marry the quantum with GR, though even here I think gravity is not fundemtal but an emergent property...bottom line though, this is so far over my head that I can admit that I really know nothing!
@@vMaxHeadroom My preference goes toward a variable speed of light following somehow a space-time temperature and density relation. Space-time being seen as a kind of continuous medium (of course these space-time variables are not material temperature and density as space-time is essentially immaterial). Such a variable light speed would have been very large just after the big bang, solving the homogeneity issue. Beside the space-time substrate comes with some form of energy solving also the dark matter issue. They are so many conjectures that we can try outside the standard frame that is obviously in a new form of Aristotle epicycle epoch !
It doesn't matter, they all just made stuff up.
@@kantanlabs3859 on the purely speculative end of things, I myself am partial to our universe being dimensionally nested between a state of the highest order of infinite energy (think 3 in comparison to the infinite set between 1 and 2, being the 'set' we live in) and another state of complete void. The energy is trying to reach its lowest possible state but is separated from the void ground state by our universe and most likely an infinite number of other (in my assertation) expanding universe bubbles on different dimensional planes completely unrelated to ours. The ultimate point being the expansion caused by dark energy is the infinite energy set trying to reach its lowest possible energy state by expressing itself as more space time in our space. There is more to this train of thought but I don't want to be typing all day. I used to think there was one other universe that could interact weakly through gravity (the idea was dark matter was the 'imprint' of another universe on the other 'side' of our spacetime fabric, but due to some data out of LIGO I have pretty much abandoned this aspect of the interpretation)
Unbelievable series. Very impressive, informative, and engaging. Feels like these should be behind a paywall or a cost for each episode, high quality content.
Would be counterproductive to bring it behind a paywall.
But also, it's not all set. Dr Subir Sarkar from Oxford invites us to entertain the possibility we could still be special observers in a universe way bigger than the CMB horizon. And the numbers that led to the nobel price for dark energy were tweaked.
These documentaries are works of art guys. Keep up the good work!
Stay well out there everybody, and God bless you friends. :)
Pretty much some of the best narration in HISTORY!
I find History of the Earth to have a better brand identity. I think its opening is just hard to compete with, and the early episodes were just full of so much emotion.
History of the Universe is suitably, calmer, there's less passion, and is more observatory. What I love about his tone here, is that it conveys a sort of skepticism about even the things he's explaining, not because it isn't observably sound and based in real science, but because he conveys the genuine uncertainty needed of this body of study.
Though I don't agree that it should always lack passion, awe, or pause, we are talking about things that are quite existential. It is literally everything that IS, and has ever been. 🌠
To wrap a great day up with the release of one of your videos makes the universe, even if just a tad, more chaotically beautiful
I love the way you articulate & animate each video. Keep up the good work!!
Not sure what is better, the content or the narrator :)
I'm not finished watching all the episodes in chronological order, but man, I do feel lucky to exist just in time to be within the first 80k people that are going to watch this. I'm not sure from where in the future you are while reading this, but I hope you have a wonderful moment. Born too late to explore the world, born to early to explore the cosmos, born at the right time to change everything, live long enough to live forever. We have one shot a existing, so let's make it count!
bonus points if you've ever stop to wonder: What if humans from the future time travel consciosness from the past, to the future, moments before death? Would everything be ok as everything would still happen as it should? No time travellers because you can't change the past, but how would technology from 1.000 years from now look?
@@and_I_am_Life_the_fixer_of_all If you time travelled, you would be in that exact location you travelled from, meaning that if you travelled more than a month or three from the target time to a tee from where you are, you'd end up in space as the Earth would be in a different location!
@@OddZodd How can we be certain it would work like that tho?
@@michaelzane3823 If I knew, I would not tell you, or anybody else ☄
Our universe exists inside the event horizon of a black hole in another universe. That's why the expansion rate varies, it depends on if our black hole is feeding or not. That also explains the homogeneous nature, as a forming event horizon was 'one location' at it's formation. Or at least, that's what let's me sleep at night. ;)
The big bang was the primordial white hole that I believe all the black holes in the previous universe fed into as they still exist as micro black holes today. Inside a black hole's ergosphere time and space switch places. Naturally I just imagine a white hole in this universe expelling all matter accrued at once hence the singularity.
Whatever the universe is, this is one of the greatest channels in it.
one of the best documentaries on CZcams. i watched all ur videos more than 2 times. keep up the same quality and thank you so much
What a fantastic episode. This helped drive home a few concepts for me. Very well produced. Thank you so much.
How on earth does this channel only have 35k subscribers ???? This is one of the best channels on CZcams
It's amazing how the puddle fits :)
I am very happy with these! They explain what we know - and what we don't know - in ways that are digestible to the lay watcher. Extremely well written and researched. Thanks for doing them - and thank you, CZcams algorithm for pointing me this way!
Michael Dembinski:
*Friend, if you listen hard enough, science barely knows anything, it is all guesses and hypothesis, the real truth is staring at them but they stubbornly refuse to go there.*
@@imo1933 Science has made giant strides. Hence you and I can share insights over this wonderful channel of information exchange driven by networked computers. Mind-blowing from even the perspective of 50 years. So science knows more than 'barely anything' - but there are some HUGE questions the science is only begin to realise are important. Consciousness, Big Bang, dark energy and dark matter - these are but three that science has barely begun to address.
@@MichaelDembinski :
*The Scientific Community are pretty good salesmen; if you take the true definition and meaning of the word "theory" and how scientists have hijacked it to have a different meaning and application in their field, you know some skulduggery is amiss, they would have you believe the word "theory" now means a proven fact without them saying so so they could have an out when the theory isn't correct or proven to be false. Those giant strides you mention they have taken are minuscule steps in reality, the fact that science only knows and understand 5% of what makes up of the universe and 95% is unknown means all these "theories" are nothing but a "house of card" and people wishing for the Scientific Community to be right instead of facing reality. They Really Know Very Little And They Admit It Often.*
@@imo1933 spouting more bullshit I see.
Another banger of a video. Thank you for putting out such great, educational content about the amazing universe we live in.
This video is a masterpiece.. I can watch or simply listen to this over and over also David is a terrific narrative!
One thing I love about our universe is: no matter whether you are using a telescope, or a microscope, no matter if you are enlarging your scope, or shrinking your view, either way, there are mind boggling beauties to be seen.
The best thing is conflict
Totally love this series, best narration I have heard. Keep up the awesome work
Absolutely remarkable work this, your documenting is BBC grade for sure. Excellent work.
i cant describe how much i appreciate these high quality videos. along your voice is so soothing!. Thank you for making videos like these that are easy to follow
Leyla Battison is the name of the Unsung Hero of this epic video. Love those topics the most. It took me to another alien galaxy where i was afraid for a moment i will never come back to my dearest Milky Way. Brrrrrr... goosebumps! That perfect lesson that never came to you in school. Oh, well... here it is now. Couple of decades late, but better than never. Master-piece. You are spoiling us with these materials. Do history of everything.
Correction: the 250x size estimate is the low end of the estimate, the study indicated the universe was at least that big, the likely size is much much larger.
So it would be older?
@@nomedeuusuario no just larger
@@RunD.Ones1s but dont they determ the age by looking at the far away object they can see?
For some reason, I really like the idea of our flat universe curving upon itself to form the funnel of a blackhole. It seems this idea has begun to gain some ground and that the mathematics seem to work out perfectly.
The problem with this, is if there are possibly multiple universes, and each of them can have different shapes.
All possible mathematical shapes will come out as mathematically possible. Our universe could be flat or so big we cant see the curvature. The thing is both would look virtually identical to us.
Math can take us pretty darn far, but like the dude said, you cant actually even begin to test this out.
Essentially math doesnt show us whats real, but what is possible in the realms of whatever variables you put in
The problem isnt the math, the problem is how do you know what parameters to start of with.
Why you don't have 1M subscribers is beyond me. This is better content than multi million dollars shows.
Impeccably well made! I love the narration, I find it very ludically informative in a soothing way ! Keep up the great work
The production is amazing. Great job. You've inspired me.
Wonderfully done! Now we just need an 8 hour version. 😉
Narration is so soothing.. knowledge immense.. visuals incredible. Thank you! Maybe we are just a universe of black holes within a black hole universe.
so as a kid camping out and looking up at the stars some 65 years ago when I blurted out "look at all them stars ya cannot see" I was right! Outstanding video of what we may now know.
The plot twist in the first 3 minutes was stellar!
This channel deserves a lot more views and subscribers. This is such excellent work.
Thank you for another brilliant video. The script, graphics, patient explanations, etc; make learning so engaging. If only school could be like this. And a big kudos to Paul Steinhardt for having the humility to publicly discredit his own original findings as he
continued to dig in and found data that disproved is original theory. The world needs more of that type of honesty. To better find real solutions to real problems.
I cannot imagine anyone with a microscope _seeing_ our 3 dimensional universe as "flat." This means my concept of _flatness_ is really jacked up. it looks expansive and without end no matter in which direction we peer. In fact, I can't even fathom its shaped based on current images and measurements.
The universe itself isn't "flat" looking, it has to do with the geometry of the universe. If we measure three different points in the universe in any direction and then triangulate those points, does the triangulation equal 180 degrees? if so, then the universe is flat. We've had a few satellites up that took measurements to see if the universe is flat, closed, or open, and from what they've measured, it is flat within a +/- 0.4% margin of error.
You guys are amazing!!! "History of the Universe" is now my Favorite Channel. I love all your world class videos ... you guys deserved multimillion subscribers and I hope it will happen like a big bang. Thank you.
Love your videos, I've always had a hard time in physics class because of the math and applying formulas and shit, but it is so fascinating to learn about our universe and our place within it
Your videos are really high quality, the kind of thing we used to see on tv 30 years ago before it became dumbed down.
Just knowing that we're living IN an explosion is shocking enough.
05:40 In case you wonder: in the picture of Georges Lemaître (c) and Albert Einstein (r), the man with the scarf on the left is Robert Millikan.
Absolutely awesome presentation and I even understood some of it. :) Seriously, very nice job. I enjoyed this immensely. Thank you.
Each time I view one of these Universe videos, I get still, very quiet. Taciturn, sad even. I am overwhelmed by feelings I can't possibly understand, much less describe. It must have something to do with my inability to get a grip on how incomprehensibly large, and utterly mysterious, the totality of existence is. That we can even attempt to form theories on the how, when and why of the Universe's existence somehow fills me with a sort of dread. Is this existential dread? Maybe so.
Again a masterfully crafted episode. I'm always amazed how you can condense the content to a tangible tale like this. And even though I'm a few days late, I truely look forward to whenever you upload another video.
Regarding the theory. I think it is quite ironic that a scientific theory (with science often being portrait as an opposite pol to religion) is hailed as if it was a religion
The Universe is 4D which is why we don't see it for what is let alone its Origin.
If it's 4d, that implies it goes further than that.
@@Krystalmyth Good point. That's exactly what many mystics believe. Many more layers and dimensions all co existing. Not sure if true, but its very fun to think about.
@@funnycwill91 I look at it in the form of Axis in a video game.
In 2d Games, the only motion you have control over, are X and Y. Up Down Left and Right
(+)
but, on a controller the diagonals count by combining the two, this manifests as the possibility of up to 8-Axis of POV. A D-Pad on a controller is 8-Axis.
(+x)
In 3d games, we have X, Y and Z for depth.
⥏⇹⥑
But in 3d games, we use analog sticks, which are still 8 axis of movement, adding sensors for zoom in-out such as a flight sim allows us up to 10.
۞
It's insufficient, and thus controllers have two analog sticks... not usually to move, but if you wanted to move up and down, or left and right as well as side to side and back and forth, you would need a second stick.
For all intents an analog stick does the same task as any d-pad except with absolute values.
But it begs the question, what would one analog stick need to be, to have the same completion of control, as an 8-Axis POV switch has over a 2d movement?
It's interesting that we have the ability to fully tame 2d movement, because of our third dimensional ability... but we don't actually have full mastery of 3d movement in a practical tool without cheating and using our bodies as controllers.
I find that fascinating. Because it implies to me, a 4d being would have no issues knowing what that controller would look like for a 3d game.........
@@Krystalmyth Haha not sure to be terrified life could be a game or happy its all for fun.
Question: do you think psychedelics help us see into other dimensions? Hijack the controls a bit.
❤️😎 please confirm out Dr Hugh Ross an astronomer Astro physisist and PhD.. your knowledge of the cosmos and how science proves God is transcendent and created and fine tuned the universe and much much more❤️🤩🤩
I love all of your channels... your voice is so soothing and your sense of story is superb.
Really good delivery, just everything well done guys, can compete with the nat geo docu's!
Man I usually love watching science videos. But this videos are out of my league. I need to learn more if I want to comprehend what’s going on. Amazing!!!!
This is...just so good.
History of the Universe -- the series -- now on Netflix in infinite instalments.
One thing that's always puzzled me about why anyone is puzzled in the first place at the homogeneity of the universe: why wouldn't we expect the universe to have just *begun* already homogeneous? "Everything is the same everywhere" seems like the most straightforward parsimonious expectation, and I would think that *non*-homogeneity would be the surprising mystery that raises all kinds of thorny questions.
Amazing video love watching and thinking about our universe even though I can’t wrap my mind around it. Can’t wait to see what we discover out there in my lifetime
This channel is criminally underrated
A cosmos documentary wouldn’t be complete without comparing it to some cake mix or chocolate
Or God playing jojo ?
Top class documentary. Clear, precise and direct. Thats the way I love it!
The research, writing and narration is bloody excellent, kudos good sir.
This channel creates absolute gold. Bravo guys!!!
Gold is almost as good as a necklace made of Bitcoin(s) ⁉
The only inflation I am confident in, is me when I consume too many carbs
Why do people feel the need to make idiotic jokes under videos literally about theory of the beginnings of our Universe?
Don't you feel quite inappropriate to make attention-seeking farts joke when the topic is so overwhelming and important?
Internet culture is weird.
@@OhMyRoystone take a pill of the chill variety dude :)
I read that as "consume too many crabs"
Phenomenaly narrated one smooth operater I've listened to this and the others he narrates all to do with the workings of the universe. He explains it all so well but I must be to simply to get it!!
The Narration is superb..fantastic documentary...one of the best I've seen.
These video's are a gift! -thank you!
Ooft I can't sleep, thank you for this, perfect timing
Find about Mindfulness. Easy way to get those beta waves back. Start with Ruby Wax's video on the 'School of Life' channel.
Waiting for the next episode. Thank you so much. Greetings from Costa Rica.
I am so happy that I found this channel.
Please excuse the pun but the imagery and artwork is out of this world
Highly recommend these videos for the comedown of an acid trip
Weed too
This guy can read the ingredients off a can of vienna sausages and still sound interesting.
I love the way the writer is unafraid to tackle some of the knotty problems being studied by theoreticians today and make it comprehendible. I look forward to and hope the BBC's new series will take up some of what is discussed in your series.
Its like poetry. It's beautiful. I love it so much. The indescribable way of trying to capturing the universe in explainable words. Just gorgeous
Could inflation have been responsible for our section of the universe being devoid of anti-matter? Whereas somewhere off a ways, life forms in an anti-matter section of the universe are asking _Where's all the missing matter?_
F'in love this channel the voice is so soothing and the science so interesting, wish i could get the narrator to read me a bed time story in person :) this channel will do thooo
Well you all knocked the dust off the ole brain cells with these .. thank you so much ..WELL DONE !
Wonderful video
Interestingly enough, physics/science cannot answer why the big bang or what was before it - physics itself claims that the question is out of reach of science because of the limitation of the scientific method. Thus we have to rely on more powerful and fundamental tools like our reasoning and logic to go further back and answer why!
Physics like we know it can’t explain the Big Bang bc before that it didn’t exist .
@@jayjiggered4103 it existed that is why big bang occured.
Because its all BS......None of this can be proven,,its all just a THEORETHICAL though EDUCATED guess...I E if there WAS a big bang,it would be reasonably easy to calculate the origin(coordinates) of it ..we could also then easily detect a delta in expansion speed between (supposed(BS) ) center and any area away from it.AND IN ANY DIRECTION.We have NONE of that.
@@Clueless2daWorld hmm yeah i agree and time travel also sounds like a idea we want to beleive in. no solid proof.
@@davis6477 That is because of ONESOILED SHITstained diaper (literal translation of ALBERT the plagiarist last name) said that time has anything to do with any of the formulas he copyed/stole from his original wifes work..Time is absolutely irrelevant,,,,,,,,,,only thing that matters is the exact single UBER multi-zillionth fraction of one quintilion of one second when any mesurement or observation is being done/made/observed.....Have fun,ON go.
Thank you for your great work..you guys put in a lot to bring your viewers informative information.. 👍
The writing and narration is truly spine tingling and awe inspiring.
I've heard this statement many times ( that we're seeing galaxies that are 45 billion light years away) but fine it hard to understand. Surely it would be more accurate to say ' we are seeing galaxies that are now 45 billion light years away but were only 13.7 billion light years away when their light was emitted' ( because the universe is expanding). Am I wrong ?
Measuring distance in an expanding universe is confusing. The light travelled for 13.7 billion years. When the light started its journey, the distance was (a lot) less than 13.7 billion lightyears. Today, the space it travelled through has expanded to measure about 45 billion light years across. If you were to send a lightray back, it would take much longer than 45 billion years to return, because the same space will expand to an even much larger size in the meantime.
What matters is that the galaxies are 45 bly away NOW. If you want to say 13 bly then you're talking about the past.
Incredible content, you are doing wonders for science communication and inspiration!
Still watching and re-watching. Great!!
The statement about a universe inside a black hole is a cool idea I thot of to describe the possible fractal nature of space time and to describe our observable limits and why it appears to be expanding could be actually shrinking. It sounds way cooler when this narrator says it tho. Cool as can be