Fighter Jet Can't Brake
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 01. 2024
- Get your aviation apparel today: theaviationcentral.com/
This is Weekly Dose of Aviation #270
Links to sources:
Fighter Jet Can't Brake - • GENUINE F-15 EMERGENCY...
Strong Headwind - • Airplane standstill in...
A321neo Landing - • Amazing Plane Spotting...
737 Rejects Takeoff - • Boeing 737 Max 8 Rejec...
A380 Up-close - • Korean Airlines Airbus...
A321neo Bounce Landing - • Wizz Air A321neo bounc...
I do not claim these clips as my own. All credit goes to the rightful owners. The clips are always used with permission from the owner. If your clip was featured and you want it taken down, send me an e-mail explaining the situation and we'll resolve it.
Want me to feature your video? Submit it here » forms.gle/d5EZHGwkMm9MPVJY9
⤵ SOCIALS:
Twitter » / officiallucaas
Instagram » / officiallucaas
Discord » / discord
TikTok » / lucaasyt
⤵ MUSIC:
Music is provided by Epidemic Sound » www.epidemicsound.com/referra...
Business inquiries? Reach me at » contact.lucaas@gmail.com - Zábava
Loved the Korean A380 being filmed from the 747, the dark blue sky makes the 380 really stand out
So do the chemtrails.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 Don’t lose your tin hat.
@@dlmac5935 I was kidding. 🤣🤣
imagine looking up and you just see a cessna hovering in mid air lol
There are videos of this and people claiming it's a glitch in the simulation and whatnot.
13kts GS 😂
@@ChicagoAirportSpotter it also sometimes looks that way when people film from trains or cars
😂
@@8o86 exactly. Motion parallax.
Good work from the pilot in the last clip. Just watched air crash investigation where despite wrong gauge readings they just continued with the flight and it resulted in catastrophe.
I was just about to say the same, lol. If airspeed indicators don't agree at X knots, well before V1, then abort. Not doing so has led to disaster more than once.
1:15 actually the plane is not completely still in mid-air ; we can see on the MFD "GS 13KT", where GS stands for Ground Speed. So the plane is still moving forward, only very, VERY slowly.
It does not prevent the plane to remain airborne though, as the front wind is more than enough to generate the lift.
Thanks for featuring our clip lucaas! All the best 👍
F-15: no sweat, it can land with a wing missing!
the Korean Air is a great clip... amazing views
The Cessna at 1:15 identifies as a helicopter now
Oh wow! It should be American, where "I identify as" began.
Or as a Fiesler Storch.
Is it me or can you see the wake turbulence pass from right to left around 01:00 ?
That’s the exhaust from the engines causing refraction (like hot air rising from a hot road) being pushed by the wake of the plane (and the wind).
So yeah basically. Quite a nice effect.
@@MeppyManhere I thought it was just a cheap camera thing. 😂 I really thought it was an optical illusion.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 physics! 🤓
that F-15 was just practicing for carrier qualifications. Cessna had his flaps extended so he was trying to go slow. Piper cubs were the slow flight specialists, they could go backwards.
yes because they have fire engines that scream towards planes on carriers. how the hell do you know that cessna has flaps out genius.
@@Itmehokiledu While this guy is talking out his @$$ about the F-15, they're actually right about the flaps. You can see them at 1:30.
At least I got the joke!
You have to remember that not everyone can get subtle sarcasm in text form.
I’ve gone backwards in a plane before we decided to turn around as the headwind was just too strong.
@@MeppyManI used to fly traffic reporters around in a Cessna 206 with a stall kit. I remember a few times, the winds were strong enough, I could stay over an accident site without having to circle.
I could watch these for days on end!😀😀🙌🏽🙌🏽❤️
F:15 = Take my brakes away 🎶
1:06 Cessna: My name is giovanni giorgio but everybody calls me giorgio
Love these clips
At [1:20] the old running in place with a twist. Flying in place and going no where. 🤔
1:43 yo its the bosses of the skies
what a promo video for Korean Air
The pilot would be smart to sell them the video!
Wow, yeah you need that. Very nice.
1:07-1:31: When your game freezes up mid-session
Ahh yes the old f15s
dang thats crazy
Amazing
"Mom, that plane is AFK"
2:45 flight the-number-it-was rolli- SIKE!
No you can't count a bounced landing as two landings in your logbook no matter how high you bounce.
That Cessna identifys as an Helicopter now.
2:20 average wizz pilot
I legit thought the Korean Air logo looked like the Pepsi logo so I said
PEPSIIIII to then realize it was Korean Air.
1:05 Look at the wingtip vortex refractions in the air
Due to the engine exhaust. Quite a cool effect.
Thank you !
Was the 380 recorded by a phone camera? If so I'd love to know what phone it is
Mam wrażenie, że film z tej cesny to z Microsoft flight 2020. 😅 Po sceneri tak wnioskuje.
I like the lack of camera man outbursts during the WIZZ landing.
Can anyone tell me what is the name of the meme song at the intro ?
1:32 probably Kelsey.
Can you do LSIA To Cayo Perico 🙏🏻
Hello lucaas i have a video of an plane bouncing a lot when plane spotting reply if you want me to do a video of it or a short if you want the video
Wow 😲
This ain’t a joke, Jack
My dad flew F-15s outta Scranton
Come on man
This might be a stupid question, but why did the jet from the first clip didn't get pulled back by the rope?
I think that happens only on carriers as the "runway" is small.
Here there is plenty of runway so why take the chance of cable snapping . I'm quite certain they are expensive......just my opinion and i'm going with it.
"We're finally taking off"
Speed Indicator: "Happy too soon?"
Great video brother from the imperial county California 👍👍🇺🇲 2024🎉🎉
To the last one:
That’s why they always say “speed is alive”, but not this time.
The cessna achieved VTOL
That Cessna was a Lockheed model practicing it’s hover mode, surprised it got leaked lol.
I thought it was Pepsi Air wth 1:42
ryan air when rean air comes in:
go thru a tank of gas and get no where
2:15 wizz air doesn't fly to Heathrow
London City or Stansted, then?!
@@Marc42 Gatwick and Luton according to flightradar24
its luton
The clip was shot at London Luton Airport during Storm Ciaran - Thursday 2nd November 2023
I thought that the f15 eagles were air force not navy ??
yeah it has an emergency hook though
The tail hook on the F15 isn't so it can land on carriers, the landing gear isn't built to take that kind of abuse.
The tail hook on the F15 is instead intended for exactly this situation, a partial hydraulic failure that results in disabled main gear brakes.
With that failure mode, you need some other way to stop, and that's what that tail hook is designed and rated for. Notice how much weaker looking that F15's tail hook is relative to the tail hook of an F18 or F14, it's pretty long sure but it's quite skinny and weak looking. That's because it only has to stop the aircraft ONCE, but it must ABSOLUTELY be certain that it is capable of doing its job that one time.
Weight is at a premium on aircraft, so they built the F15's tail hook only as strong as it needs to be to do its job reliably, and not a single ounce more, otherwise that would detract from the combat range of the F15.
All other air force fighter aircraft have similar tail hooks, for similar "the brakes won't work" type in-flight emergencies.
If you can add maybe 50 pounds to the aircraft and have it able to come back and be fixed instead of having the pilot(s) have to eject out of it because they can't stop on the runway, that's a lot of taxpayer money saved, and as much as people joke about it, the US military is trying to cut costs as much as it can (not because that saves money, but because that means you get more capability for the same price).
Some one pls explain if f15s have arestor hook why can't it land on aircraft carrier
From what ive found, the hook is too weak to use safely, the gear structure isnt strong enough, and its just not built for carrier operations (no foldable wings and equipment needed for carrier takeoff)
Many fighters have arrestor hooks for emergency stopping on a runway. You’ll notice how long the cable was and how long it took to slow down compared to a carrier. Just not rated the same.
All American fighters have them. The fighter bases have that cable system. The hook and landing gear are not made to handle the stress of a carrier landing.
@@ronwyckoff824 I believe the F-35B and Harrier are the exception.
lol, at least end on a good one, seeing a plane not take off is a tad meh
😮
Nice
What accent does this guy have?
I think he is Swedish or similar Nordic from memory.
I wonder how long it takes for that a380 to run out of chemicals for the chemtrail.
Ryanair: dude let’s be more harder
Woe
Plane.
First?
Aren’t there restrictions on how close one plane can get to another? How did that guy who filmed an A380 from a 747 get that close?
I think separation mid flight needs to be minimum 2000 feet (not positive on that), so a high quality camera and lens can make short work of it.
Relax, someday you'll learn what a zoom lens is. preferably optical and not digital.
Relax expert, there’s no way a Captain of a 747 Took this footage. You know so much, what do you think the FAA would have to say about that?
@@dlmac5935 oh right. it pisses me of when i have to school semi literates. and i'm sure that you'll also be outraged when you learn that "captains" also SLEEP when piloting an aircraft. wonder what FAA has to say about that much less about filming another aircraft.
Maybe you should stick to your tractor and stop expecting pilots to have the same driving mentality like yours.
To sum it up, google "auto-pilot" which your tractor doesn't have but this aircraft does.
The pilot "rejected" the take off? More like he "aborted" the take off.🤓👍
su 27 better
Simpler maybe. Not better.
SU-27 was designed to be compete against the F-15, and it's a fantastic airframe for what it is.
IIRC the SU-27 hasn't had an electronics upgrade in a long time. Sure it's great at turning and burning, but A: that burning can't be kept up for long because the engines overheat, and B: If it can't see what's hunting it, it won't be turning and burning to begin with.
Going off of that, it's easy pickings for a modern F-15, with it's advanced active radar homing AMRAAM missiles, with even better, longer ranged missiles on the horizon.
That's just the missiles. The F-15 itself is not holding anything back either, we're starting to upgrade them to the F-15 EX standard, which includes reconfiguring the flight controls so that they are fully fly-by-wire, which allows the F-15 EX to do things that were previously only doable by the F-22, and that's WITHOUT turning off the flight envelope protections. With the SU-27, you can do some of the same things, but you need to turn off the AOA limiter or the aircraft won't respond fast enough even with the control stick pushed or pulled to it's limits.
The F-15 EX on the other hand is fully inside its flight envelope when it does these things, and that flight computer is SMART too. If the pilot passes out in flight (due to G-LoC), the flight computer will override the pilot's inputs to prevent the aircraft from impacting terrain, all the while blaring an alert into the cockpit so that the pilot knows what they need to do immediately after they regain consciousness.
@@44R0Ndin yea but ngl the su 27 could kill an f15 pretty easily thanks to its crazy amount of guided air to air missiles
@@imchromeplayer3310
Sure, but who gets a lock first? My bet is on the F-15, with it's better radar. Or since we're talking about an actual fight, let's talk about actual tactics. The US at least has other fighter aircraft with even better radar. Such as the F-35. Now, Russia has it's own super-fancy stealth fighter I know, the SU-57.
But can the SU-57 RIGHT NOW (not "we plan for it in the future", I'm talking TODAY) feed weapons-grade lock info to that SU-27? I don't think so. The F-35 can do exactly that with the F-15.
The F-15 wouldn't be flying alone these days, and neither would the SU-27. IDK what the SU-27's got on its side as far as other aircraft to assist, but let's say they DO NOT have the SU-57, because let's be real there's less than 20 of those that have been assembled, over a period of just about 10 years. Can't make it = same reason the V-2 didn't win Germany WWII. They couldn't produce them fast enough, it wasn't enough. So that means that the SU-57 won't be making a difference.
Surely that means that there's not that many F-35's right, after all "Russia has near parity with the US", right? Wrong.
We just cut the ribbon on the 1000th F-35 produced. One Thousand stealth fighters, with amazing radars, that don't even need to go firing their own missiles to claim kills. Instead, they phone that job out to something that can carry more missiles, like an F-15. The F-15 had the missiles, so it gets credit for the kill as well.
Going by that, with the F-35 doing nothing but "being there" to feed info to the F-15, my bet is that the F-15 gets a lock first, fires off 2 AMRAAM missiles, and that's one splashed SU-27. All the while the SU-27's only clue that something is wrong is a missile lock warning when the AMRAAM's turn on their terminal guidance active radar seekers. Not much time to react to that, that means the missile's on the order of 10 miles out and closing at somewhere between mach 3 and mach 4.5. No outrunning that, and you won't out turn two of them without stalling the aircraft and falling out of the sky, which is still a mission kill on the SU-27.
@@44R0Ndin oh yea youre right
Contents degrading day by day, likely to unsubscribe your channel
Don't let the door hit you on the way out, there's only so much "new and interesting" stuff generated every day after all, and Lucaas doesn't display footage of incidents where people died or were severely injured.
So from that small remaining segment of new stuff that gets posted, I'm pretty sure we get most if not all of it.
I guess feedback can be useful, but one person threatening to unsubscribe isn’t really helpful,and seems odd to announce to everyone.
@@MeppyManjust for the heck of it, I subscribed and immediately unsubscribed from this guy. That will teach him.