Londoniyyah - Part 24 - Sikhism | Mohammed Hijab
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- Listen as audio: soundcloud.com...
Londoniyyah - Part 24 - Sikhism | Mohammed Hijab
To be updated about our content please subscribe and open the notifications.
----
BOOK A LIGHTHOUSE MENTOR
Are you or someone you know doubting Islam? Do you find yourself struggling to find answers? Do you have a hard time speaking to someone about Islam? Are you considering Islam but are unsure about certain concepts? Are you an activist, Imam or community leader who is unsure about how to handle questions related to science, philosophy, the Islamic moral code, etc.?
You are not alone. Over the course of the last decade or more there has been a rapid proliferation of content online and in academic institutions that has eroded the faith of some people.
Seeing the rise of this phenomenon , Sapience Institute is introducing a One to One mentoring service called LIGHTHOUSE.
BOOK A MENTOR HERE: sapienceinstit...
VISIT our website for articles in English, Spanish and Turkish; mentoring service, learning platform and for speaker requests: sapienceinstit...
If you want to explain Sikhism why not invite a Sikh? This lecture is just flawed in its inception.
What else can u expect from insecure people!
typical narrow minded souls... sadly, this is who Muslims are learning from. These are their teachers. Spread lies and say whatever you can to show we are better and everyone else is bad.
Sikhism is a sect of hinduism
@@rsingh9019 ye by an insecure mullah
Guru Nanak and the 9 Gurus were NOT muslims. They agreed with being of only One God, No Idols, No rituals, and it does not align with Islam. Islam and Sikhism are totally different religions. Guru Nanak agrees upon Sufism but not as per Islam's definition.
@@MyTechniqueWorks I agree Guru Nanak was not a Muslim , rather he was tutored by Hindus and Muslims and made his own faith
Guru Nanak taught us that there is no reason to distinguish/judge others based on religion because it causes Maya (e.g. war, anger, etc.) which are distractions from God. Instead, we can ALL -- as Sikhs, Muslims, Hindus, Bhuddists, Christians, etc. -- apply key principles to our lives to be better devotees to the one God. We should ALL remember and recite God's Naam (name) -- which can vary depending on your language/country of origin. But we're ALL praying to the same, the One, the True, the Pure God. So the Gurus never discriminated against others based on religion. Even if they were killed by someone in the name Islam, that doesn't mean that Islam is wrong, it means THAT PERSON was wrong and not a TRUE Muslim. This is coming from a Sikh btw, this is what Sikhi teaches us.
@@someone-enoemos- I agree with it for not causing fights between religions . But my friend that is the view of a humanist. I disagree as we are not worshiping all the same God , every religion apart from Islam is polytheistic .. you might say that Sikhism is monotheistic, but your Sikhi ( some or all ? ) believe Nanak came down as God in human form . The concept of Sikhi is we are all God , my friend to anyone that is not monotheistic, Islam is the only religion that districts creator from creation . Although I do love your comment somewhat as Sikhs generally are good people, but I don’t agree with your concept my friend . If God is real , he would send his own distinct way , pure and true
@@issaaabella1225 What you said is correct but not entirely. In Sikhi there is only one God, and we creatures - as humans and animals - all belong to God. The idea is that our souls/minds are God-given and that we are on this Earth being tested to see who deserves to reunite with God. That doesn’t mean that I am God or you are God or that the Gurus were God. It means that we are only alive because of God, therefore, that LIFE can only exist because God allows it to exist. Islam teaches very similar ideas because the truth is always the truth, no matter whose mouth it’s coming from. That is why we would never even try to disprove/criticize Islam, Hinduism, or any faith.
@@someone-enoemos- I don’t know my friend .. I been watching your scholars such as Jagraj Singh , BOS etc .. this is what they preach . Ne way God bless u , u seem like a good soul 👍
I applaud that you have attempted to decipher the Sikh tradition, however, here are some points of note:
* The idea that the Sikh tradition does not have a Creation story Is not true. Hijab is right when he states that Naturalistic references are within the Guru Granth Sahib.
* We do not believe in Pantheism, for we believe that Vahiguru transcends space and time and all materialistic phenomena (although maybe I misheard and it was Panentheism which was mentioned, I cannot tell).
* Sikh scholars, during the time of the Gurus, openly engage in philosophical discourse and highlight that.the Sikh tradition itself is different from the Hindus and the Muslims.
* We are believers of a non-dualistic framework, and that this is the true nature of the universe, which does not agree with the mainstream Islamic Madhabs (most of them at least).
* We acknowledge the existence of different deities, if you will, but the Sikh tradition asserts that they all come from the One Allah and worshipping them is fruitless.
* That being stated, we also believe in the divine attributes as enshrined in the Quran, the 99 names/divine attributes of Allah, and these attributes (many of them) are even utilised in the Guru Granth Sahib.
* Yes, we embody the Guru Granth Sahib as a living Guru, however, Gurmukhi is not a dialect of the Punjabi language, it is a script created by the Gurus, and can be used to write different languages, like Braj, Hindi, Sanskrit, etc.
* Like classical Abrahamic theism, Sikhs also believe that this world can be destroyed in an instant by the will of Allah, just as it was created by Allah.
* Yes, Guru Nanak Sahib did go to Mecca according to our tradition(s), enshrined in the Janamsakhis, the Vaars, and even in non-Sikh sources, and not just Mecca, but some sources also that Guru Nanak Sahib visited Masjid Al-Aqsa.
* An amalgamation does not really make sense, to be frank with you, we have huge theological differences with both Hindus and Muslims. You mention the rituals we do seem to be similar to Muslims, but you haven't elaborated which ones, could this be provided?
* We deny the Final Prophethood of Muhammad Sahib, but we acknowledge that he was sent by Allah, and many other Bhagats, Peers, etc. and indeed was a Prophet of sorts (different from the Islamic sense).
* We believe that the status of the Gurus is higher than that of Prophets or deities (and in continuation the Guru Granth Sahib), I am not sure what is being referred to when it is said that Guru Nanak Sahib affirmed the Prophecy of the Prophet Muhammad, is this more of a generality or something specific?
* Guru Nanak Sahib and the other Gurus met people of all faiths, and crossed many territories, to state that they just learned in a Madrassa and Hindu Temple and therefore have no knowledge of comparative religion, that point does not really make sense, he traveled much more than most other major religious figures in history.
* Aatma refers to the Self, or more specifically, the individual spirit within the body in the form of light (Jot-Saroop) which exists in all living things.
Just some thoughts to jot down, I have watched most of the video, but not all of it,
I think that if you frame this into a connection, or perhaps a philosophical inquiry into the Islamic tradition and dualistic/non-dualistic frameworks of other traditions (as well as within Islam itself), this discussion could be more fruitful.
Secondly, Sikhs do have an eschatology after death, the idea that "nothing happens" after Death is simply not true.
We Do believe in a heaven or hell. Swarag and Narak exist within the Sikh framework. In the video itself, "the three worlds" is mentioned in a quotation by an individual. These three worlds are:
Narak Log.
Swarag Lok.
Patal Lok (this world).
Prophet is different from deity but tbh lot certain travels of travels of Guru Nanak seems to be later fabrications
@@zakyzayn5361 How are they fabrications?
What is the mainstream sikh view on the prophet Muhammad عليه السلام
How funny u get non Sikh to explain about sikhi that is like me getting a non Muslim to explain about Islam
Bcoz they are not seekers of knowledge but want to confirm their own prejudices… the very belief that Mohammed is the last prophet and Islam is the only path to heaven brainwashes Muslims, this belief is the root to all conflicts…
@@kingshuggz1628 doesn’t matter . It depends how knowledgable they are , and what evidence they bring. Like to date it is well known guru Nanak read Islamic and hindu Buddhist scriptures and formulated his own faith after gaining considerable knowledge . Sikhs would deny this ( apart from a few ) the few have unfortunately been sentenced to death from the SGPC
@@issaaabella1225 prove your claim the guru him self said I am not a Muslim nor a Hindu so where u people get your info frm and mate the universal truth can not be changed t
@@issaaabella1225 also if it don’t matter like u say then the truth is you people are Hindu who worship shiva jst like the Jewish and the black stone u people go around is the linga same as the Hindu Allah in s shiva 786 is shiva which is the fallen
@@kingshuggz1628 exactly he made his own faith .. what I said . He amalgamated faiths with his own personal spin .
Proud to be a Sikh..🪯
@@joban8177 Sikhism is just Hinduism
This guy that was brought into speak on Sikhism is literally looking up stuff as he goes. Said he doesn’t know the Mul Mantar even though he had already recited chunks of. No hate, but perhaps next time it would be better to bring in somebody that is more knowledgeable. Would be better than bringing in someone who has to search up the info as they go. Would basically be the same as Muhammad being alone and google searching everything as he goes. If multiple speakers need to look up info or tell you they need to do more research, then they probably aren’t qualified to speak on it. Everyone is reading straight off an internet search.
There is so much ignorance and misinformation in this episode. Perhaps it would have been better to have a discussion with a practicing Sikh, instead of 3 closed-minded Muslims who’s intentions from the get-go are not to understand, but to oppose anything that counters their dogmatic belief in Islam.
There are 4 points I wanted to address to Mohammed specifically:
1. Sikhism is not an ‘amalgamation’ of Islam and Hinduism, and Sikhs do not believe that Guru Nanak simply took ideas from both religions and merged them together. There are stark differences between Sikhism and all other religions that emphasise its complete uniqueness, beginning with its creation belief, as Sikhism is the only religion that seems to align closely with contemporary scientific theories such as the Big Bang, Evolution, and the acceptance of possible life on other planets, in other galaxies. More importantly to your point on amalgamation, Sikhs believe the 10 Gurus received their message directly from God, and that the Gurus were living embodiments of God, not simply messengers like the prophet Mohammed, who took the words of the Quran from the angel Gabriel, rather than from God himself. As the Gurus took their word directly from God, it renders the argument that they amalgamated ideas from existing religions as false, in the eyes of Sikhs.
2. There is a difference between cutting hair and nails. Sikhs do not cut living hair, as it is seen as both a commitment to God’s creation, and also a representation of a distinct physical identity of the Khalsa. Sikhs do, however, remove dead hairs, and this is one aspect that the Kangha (wooden comb) represents. When one brushes their hair with a comb, or washes their hair in the shower, dead hairs are removed, painlessly. Similarly, Sikhs remove the dead part of the nail by trimming it. It is, of course, scientifically proven that it is only the matrix of the nail that grows, and is living, whereas the nail plate is dead. Like dead hair, the dead part of the nail can be removed painlessly. Hopefully this clears up any confusion you have over the apparent hypocrisy in Sikhs not cutting hair but cutting nails, as they simply remove the dead aspects of both.
3. Your understanding of the Sikh concepts of reincarnation and heaven/hell are rudimentary at best. Sikhs believe in all three of these concepts. They believe that the light of God is within all living things, and this light is on a journey back to God. The light goes through countless reincarnations, before it reaches human form, and this is it’s potential final destination before returning to the paradise of God’s realm, depending on how the human life is lived. If the life is lived well, then the light (soul) joins God, but if the life is not lived well, the light returns into the cycle of reincarnation. If the life is lived particularly badly, then Sikhs believe in the concept of a Hell, but unlike Islam, this is not a permanent hell, for how can a just God punish a finite life of sin with an infinite afterlife of Hell? Sikhs believe this Hell is a temporary purgatory, before the soul re-enters the cycle of reincarnation, and embarks once more on it’s journey to God.
4. I also wanted to make a point on the idea that Sikhs are misinterpreting history by denouncing the Mughal regime. It is a historical fact that the Mughals forcefully attempted to convert both Sikhs and Hindus to Islam, throughout India, including many of the Gurus themselves, and perhaps most famously, Guru Gobind Singh’s two youngest children, both of whom were bricked alive for refusing to convert. This level of intolerance of the Sikh faith is not hard to comprehend when one views how similarly modern-day Sikhs have been treated by fundamentalist Muslims of the Taliban in Afghanistan, a regime of similar intolerance, and founded upon the same type of fundamentalist Islamic principles as those of the Mughal Empire; an Empire that was ultimately defeated, incidentally, as the Sikhs endured, spreading their message of Love, Tolerance and the Oneness of Waheguru across the world.
One more thing to add, towards the end of this video it is claimed that there are 4 main sins of Sikhism, with one being the eating of halal meat. This again, is a misrepresentation of Sikh teachings.
Mohammed dismissively smirks at the notion of halal meat being more sinful than murder, and of course, Sikhs do not believe this.
They do, however, believe that eating of halal meat is a sinful act, as the light of God is within all living things, and the ritual of halal slaughter of an animal is needlessly cruel, and brings unnecessary pain and distress to one of God’s creations.
The guru embarked on a night journey
And our prophet embarked on a night journey
Why did he copy?
@@HansJuliusFoester hallal slaughter isn't cruel or brings needless pain.
@@BilalAhmad-sk7gg That’s your subjective opinion. I would say an animal suffers less via a bolt gun, which causes instant death, as opposed to a barbaric slitting of the throat and allowing it to slowly choke to death on it’s own blood. And yes, it’s a completely needless, outdated practice in 2022, but then again, virtually the entirety of Islam is needless and outdated in 2022.
Please read my response. Scientific studies have shown that the Halal method of slaughter is the most ethical method of slaughter since it causes the animal the least amount of distress and pain. The bolt gun method is very brutal in comparison, large animals have to be pulverized multiple times for them to be stunned. each time the animal is struck it causes them extreme amounts of pain. The animal dies when its skull and brain is crushed under extreme pressure and when the animal is eaten it can cause mad cow disease in humans. Also, in Halal slaughter the animal is not held in a cramped unhygienic slaughter house to hear the screams of other animals die, which is the case when electrocution, and the captive bolt gun method are used. In Halal slaughter animals are raised in an open environment and don't hear screams of other animals.
Also, the animal doesn't choke on its own blood because the animal dies shortly after its carotid vein is cut by a sharp knife, it spasms due to nerve reflexes. Professor Wilhelm Schulze compared Halal slaughter to slaughter using the bolt gun. He used the EEG machine to record the amount of pain felt by the animal by monitoring the brain activity.
In halal slaughter
the EGG recording showed no change 3 seconds after the incision was made, the 3 seconds afterwards shown a condition of deep sleep. After the 6 seconds the EEG recording showed a level of 0. This means the animal suffered minimal to no pain.
In the bolt gun method the animal suffered severe pain, after it was rendered unconsciousness by the stunning.
Also, you have to be practical because in the past they didn't have painkillers, the captive bolt gun, and stunning. So, the most ethical method of slaughter throughout history has been through an experienced butcher. Finally, Islam is very beneficial since it is the true word of God (I can provide you with proof). it is practically the only religion with a preserved scripture and the only true monotheist religion. It solves the problem of alcoholism that causes 200 000 deaths per year, gambling, bribery, cheating of all kinds, usury of wealth and property, world hunger. In the past it gave rights to orphans and slaves, stopped femicide (pre-islamic arabs used to kill their female infant daughters before Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) put an end to this evil.
Happy to see that Sikhism was discussed in this Londoniyyah series Alhamdulilah. Definitely learnt a lot, as Sikhism (I find) is widely under- discussed
What absolute nonsensical arguments. As a proud Sikh, I can honestly say, Sikhi has been grossly misrepresented by these speakers here. Most of the “problems” spoken about here are the same “problems” that are glaringly obvious in Islam also. Any religion who says only they have the truth falls short of the glory of the Lord who created all. Anyway, I don’t care to disprove Islam as I am totally satiated by Sikhi and I hope my sincere Muslim brothers and sisters are satiated by Islam also. Just came across this on my TL and as a logical and rational human being, none of these arguments convinced me :) Just as a side note, as for the “hairy vagina” comments, maybe you should keep your thoughts and eyes on what is halal for you which is your own shaven Muslim women. We’re not interested in what “science” can prove about hair, we know what our Lord created as it grows without instruction in any crevice that the Lord willed.
Yes brother, you're so right. As Sikhs, we hope that those who call themselves Sikhs, Muslims, Hindus, etc. can actually APPLY those principles in their real life. Otherwise, they are not true devotees of the One God.
Sikhism is a sect of Hinduism
@@SalmaiChicken Islam is a sect of Christianity
Gurmukhi is not a dialect of Punjabi, Gurmukhi is the script.
9:00 he is totally disinterested in actually understanding the religion, but rather just tries to make it seem as unoriginal as possible by saying every single idea is stolen from either Islam, Hinduism, or even western enlightenment thinkers. I use to like Mohammad, but he has clearly blocked his brain in a way that he won’t be able to grow any other way.
I think you're projecting. Reaching. He speaks with others on their belief all the time and we will see the world through our own world view and compare, that's normal human behavior
@@TheFaro2011 yeah I agree with the last part, that we all view the world with our own world views, but to me it’s apparent that Mohammad isn’t even open to changing his world view. He commentates and debates from the perspective of a Muslim, where he believes he has already found the truth and that all other ideas are incorrect.
Well, thats the issue... they are too scared to want to learn, remained as mere human beings. We Sikhs are taught to become Saints not mere mortals. They act like they know it all but deep down are full of insecurities. They are religious yes but not anywhere close to becoming one with Allah, nor ever experienced Him. Same goes for Christians. I see these both groups to be the exact same.
@@HarpreetSingh-jd3tujust reading your comment it seems your the one who is being arrogant and stuck up not willing to learn. If the foundation or core beliefs of a religion isn’t true and doesn’t make sense why would anyone continue to follow that way of life and then say “ your being dishonest”.
@@Ahmed-pl2gblmao the foundation doesnt make sense to you that doesnt mean it doesnt actually make sense
I've always felt Sikhism began as a Thariqah but went too extreme, so much so, they made a religion.
may Allah guide you to his tariqa
@@aimanismail4683 May ALLAH guide we us all to follow only Allah and believe in Allah , his Angels, Books from Allah, his messengers, the Last day, and in the Taqdir, that all good and bad is from Allah the Most High and I believe in the resurrection after death.
[Taqdir:Predestination]
La illaha il lallah muhammadur-rasullah .
I can see this, it's like ahmadiyah movement, i can see influence of sikhism in that and it's so off shoot it's no longer identifiable as Islam.
The last sikh guru who created the baptised sikhs spoke with God directly in heaven before he came to earth so ur thinking is wrong! Go read some sikh scriptures and realise u have been stuck in a pond and that pond will connect to the sikh faith which is the ocean!
Sikhs were incapable of competing/rivaling Islam in Punjab.
SARDARS ARE THE GREATEST WARRIORS OF HUMANITY
Yes Br.Hijab the concept of God in Sikhism from a philosophical point of view is that it is pantheistic or anthropomorphic. The belief that God is Omnipresent. These key concepts are the fine details which lead to or are Shirk. The Islamic concept of God is that Allah is transcendent but yet his imminence or his qualities and attributes can be seen within the creation. These key ideas allows the philosophy of Islam to maintain a true concept of 'Tawheed'. This is what distinguishes Islam from every other faith on earth.
The Almighty Allah's qualites and characteristics are unique to him only, they aren't shared with his creation.
It's not anthropomorphic, it's states explicitly in Sikhi that god as no face or any type of form at a all, it's even genderless.
@@rajkaranvirk7525 my point is that in Sikhism, the belief is that God is within the creation (omnipresent), whereas in Isalm, God is not.
It's pantheistic but not anthropomorphic. In fact Abrahamic religions are the ones that worship anthropomorphic God including Islam.
whatever, sikhism gives divine characteristics to gods creation. divinity is an undefined, infinite, uncreated unlimited quality that can only be applied to God the trancendant being...not a created guru which is a man @@creamrisesup
40:30 Interesting point about the "divine spark". I remember in the Jordan Peterson episode that he used this very term and asked brother Hijab whether this concept was found in Islam...
The divine spark concept is seen in Buddhism , Hinduism. Many of the hipster community in America that I lived for some time used this very term to make a "cocktail of believes " they borrowed from those religions I mentioned above .
Could also just be classified as soul
@@mj897 Not in the context he used. Otherwise everyone has a soul, there is consensus on the matter across the abrahamic religions. JP mentionned it as a specificity to certain individuals
@@Ersilay the word used was atma... just giving a literal translation to the closest word in English. Either would work, its a very broad concept, simultaneously. This is the problem with studying Eastern dharma through a western academic abrahmuc lense, concepts and nuances are not equivalent.
@@mj897 I was talking about JP, not this video... what are you on about?
I wish the session was divided in description box. May Allah reward you all.
Salam, do you mean time stamps?
@@hooman467 yes
Ahmadiyyah episode? Missed out on that one
czcams.com/video/WlHaI6NlDV0/video.html
Often people these days think that the concept of tradition of Langar is the one from Sikhism. That's not exactly true. Historically, Sufis have always practiced the concept of Langar. It was Khawaja Moinuddin Chishti Sahib who brought this concept of Langar to India.
His disciple was Khwaja Qutbuddin Bakhtiyar Kaki, whose disciple was Khwaja Fariduddin, Punjabi Sufi saint. Guru Nanak mentions Khawaja Farid in his books and takes inspirations from Baba Farid.
Even today all major Sufi shrines have langar. In Ajmer Dargah's courtyard, people are fed daily and the food is vegetarian so that everyone can have it. It's just that Muslims these days have been distanced from Sufism, its teachings and traditions.
Not just Langar but also other beautiful traditions like Khidmat-e-Khalq i.e serving the creation is serving the Creator. Sufis have always been those who have always wholeheartedly embraced the needy, poor and troubled ones with unconditional love.
Very interesting Jzk for sharing
@@Ashleii no problem brother
langar is uniquley an islamic concept but taken by sikhs. soup kitchens were a norm throughout the ottoman empire and ayyubid empires and of course primarily under khulafa rashideen
Your wider point re langar is correct but in point of fact ʿAlī ibn ʿUthmān al-Hujwīrī, actually pre-dates Khwaja Chishtī Muʿīn al-Dīn Ḥasan Sijzī and instituted langar in Lahore.
Langar as a tradition, and its prevalence within the world in every Sikh institution is indeed a unique phenomena of the Sikh tradition. As for the etymological origins of "Langar", it comes from the Persian, 'Langar', but also from the older Sanskrit, 'Analgreh' [from the fire place] (as we know Persian and Sanskrit are inter-related). That being stated, the Langar tradition, or rather, the idea of a communal kitchen in which people of all backgrounds can come and partake in does not stem from the Sufis, or the Sikhs for that matter, but is something that existed in various forms throughout the world.
However, in sheer scope, and as an integral aspect of the religion itself, it is uniquely a Sikh phenomenon.
Sikhism is embedded to punjabi ethnic nationalism and identity. People follow alot of things not because it's true but because of a cultural, ethnic and identity pressures. Just as any IRA member if he even knows what apocrypha is.
How is it embedded In such?
True its more of a culture punjabi identity then a religion
@@Sweety-ut8zw not really. You have plenty of punjabi muslims and Hindus so with your logic, they shouldn't exist they should all be sikh
Nonsense! Of course the Religio/societal culture of a land has an impact upon evolving practices of any emerging spiritual communities with a new approach and outlook, however, your statement is a lazy one, lacks theological/Historical understanding
"Sikhism is embedded to punjabi ethnic nationalism and identity."
If that is a critique, then the same can be said of Islam and Arab ethnic identity:
- Muhammad's/Allah's final word (Qur'an) being revealed in Arabic, with only truest understanding possible for Arabic speakers - Arabic is the most special/holy language, given primacy and glorified.
- Most Holy/Perfect person is Arab, descent from this distinctly Arab lineage (Ahl Al'Bayt), especially male lineage (Sayyid) is venerated, and enjoy social esteem (especially historically).
- Hafiz must memorize in Arabic
- Adhan in Arabic, even if population doesn't speak it
- Islamized countries inevitably becoming Arabized to an extent (language and writing systems, greeting customs in Arabic, names, etc.)
- With prayers always pointing to Mekkah/Arabian Land
- Holiest shrine (Mekkah and Kaaba) being in Arabian land
- Obligatory Hajj to Arab lands to visit Kaaba shrine
"People follow alot of things not because it's true but because of a cultural, ethnic and identity pressures. "
This is also the case of Islam, especially in highly devout countries, where renouncing Islam, or becoming faithless, is highly enforced through coercive social pressures or violence force from family or social circle, sometimes punished by execution by some country. In these cases, coercion makes the adherence to the belief system, not validity of truth-claims made by it.
With ethnic issues, we can see this appeal in Hijab's shorts as well - many appeals to ethnic sentiments via racialized critiques, contrasting Islam with Baizuo worldview in Europe (he speak to many Muslim living in Westerner countries).
(I don't argue to be antagonistic, but to give counterpoints in a direct fashion from an agnostic standpoint. If I make a mistake in arguments, please correct. Thank you friend, and apologies if English mistakes.)
May Allah Accept your works, and make it a means of acceptance and Guidance for the Ummah!
Hijaab, if you are Muslim and follow Sunnah then why do you make a mockery of other religion? I see your jokes and giggles. You need to be more professional.
Which sunnah are you referring to? Any references?
Khalistanis mock Hindus and their religion.
@@Amardeep661 Sikhism is just Hinduism
Where has the ahmidyyah video gone?
Good thing we have brothers and sisters that record the videos and then upload them as well
Ahmadiyya video??. I was over half way through it. Where has it gone
Explaining Sikhism to others when you are biased is not a good idea, nor is it fair
One God concept is not the exclusivity of Islam. It is basically Hindu concept, so that means Muhammed borrowed the One God concept from Hindus.
I'm hoping an episode on the Bahaii is coming
Brother Muhammad, I know as a matter of fact that others would find the snickering offensive. Please try not to do this انشاءاللہ and it will be more beneficial rather than Stoke up hate
He always does that he makes .money out of other religion
@@jasmitsirah lies. He's always tells the truth. How does he make money from other religions?
He doesn’t need to respect kufr
@Generalissimus Leon I never asked him to respect kufr.
Did the prophet saws go around makkah laughing and snickering at the practices of the quraysh? No.
@@aibel99 He (SAW) didn't snicker he smashed the idols
Why was the Ahmadiyyah episode removed? It stopped midway for me...was enjoying it.
Thats part 25
shaytaan didn't like it
As Jesus Christ wasn't the founder of Christianity, so was Nanak Dev not the founder of Sikhism. In Sikh stories, there're several clues that Baba Nanak was a Muslim but, the middle verse of the Var 1:32 of Bhai Gurdas alone is enough to prove that he was a practicing Muslim who recited Quran, gave Azan (Ba'ang) and prayed five times a day on his Mussalah.
If that's your logic, then mohammed was a hybrid jew/Christian/pagan
Post a Link of this Verse please
Copy paste the verse
Hey is the qadianiyyah series deleted from youtube?????
Where is the Ahmadyia video guysssss??!!!!!!
Did it also cut off for you ? I was watching it last evening and then it suddenly became privatised
I think they will reupload it.
@abdullah ibn my man ❤️❤️❤️❤️ thank you so much
I think you should stick to your koran book and Muhammad and not make assumptions about others if dont know jack about others.
What Nonsense Hijab and his 2 callers are talking about....Hijab is doing what he does st speakers corner....May God show Hijab some decency, respect, truth, his Ego is too high....the lengths people go through just to get a platform and get views on utube....This Guy needs help
@@bahadursingh5926 Sikhism is just Hinduism
@@bahadursingh5926 Sikhism is just Hinduism
The brother who's speaking should speak loudly and with some confidence he sounds scared
Scared?🤣
agreed
How to know which religion is true?
Employing the following simple criteria will help establish which religion is true and most likely to be from God:
1. The idea and nature of God should be simple and easily understandable to any sane human being, regardless of their level of education. Similarly, the practitioners of the religion should have a clear understanding of the core tenets of their faith, with no ambiguity or confusion.
2. This idea should be fully supported by the scriptures of the said religion.
3. The message of that religion and its religious book should be preserved without any human interpolation.
4. The religion mustn’t be tribal or ethnocentric; it should be accessible to everyone from anywhere in the world. Common sense dictates that if God wants humanity to follow a particular religion, it should be easily accessible to all.
5. The scripture must support the universality of its message.
6. The textual preservation of the religious texts should be verifiable by third-party sources.
7. The religion should be known to a large portion of humanity.
8. Its practitioners feel happy for others to join their faith and actively invite people to join or learn about their religion.
You've basically summarised sikhi in a way you wanted to. The people you influence follow what your saying and the wrong message is spread.
The answers to all your doubts is easily referenced. In basics of sikhi videos.
This person aswell as Hamza Tzortzis debated basicsofsikhism and he lost badly to them, showing how Sikhism is built not on rationality at all
@@noorhassan4361 Islam is the easiest faith to debate against. Your living is proof.
What is the sikh concept of nirgun sargun theology
@Aala1Farooqui not theology. Read into the actual way nirgun sargun is explained. You guys have a habit of twisting stuff. How many times has the quran been changed ?
Don't twist the question. Just say do you believe in the concept of nirgun sargun
I donot see any similarity between islam ans sikhism except monothism
Sikhism branched out of Sufism. Reason Guru Nanak said that “ He is neither Muslim nor a Hindu” is because of the savagery of the invading Turks and their kings and yet claiming to be Muslims.
Another point is that many Muslims became Sikhs when they too became disillusioned by the oppressive Sultans. King Jahangir mentions this fact in his biography.
Sikhs mostly belong to the Jatt tribe of Punjab who are mostly Muslims in Pakistan part of the Punjab and share the same clan names with them.
The Moghuls oppressed them, cooked alive their teacher, bricked the children of their last Guru into a wall alive. Hence their hatred for Muslims.
Yet their Gurus entertained great friendships with many Sufi leaders. Mian Muhammad was invited to lay the first brick to the foundations of the Golden temple.
Sufi leader Peer Buddhu Shah sacrificed himself and his disciples in defending the Sikhs in battle against the Moghuls.
During the violence at the partition of Punjab Sikhs spared the Muslims of Maler Kotla because their ancestor had condemned the Fatwa from the Mullah who ordered the sons of the Guru to be bricked alive into a wall.
To understand Sikhsim we have to look at our own failings as Muslims and recognise that the Kingship, Sultan era in our history was nothing but brutal and had little or nothing to do with true Islam.
brutality of sultans = sikhism good. Understood 👍
Sikhi has nothing to do with sufism
Proud to be a sikh
Sikhism is an offshoot of Hinduism
@@SalmaiChicken I hear u spit a lot of venom but provide proof of ur claim??? The very first sikh guru made it absolutely clear he was not hindu nor muslim so where u get ur rubbish from?
@SalmaiChicken islam is an offshoot of Jewish and Christianity prove me wrong!
@@SalmaiChicken islam is off shot of Jewish and Christianity prove me wrong
Such an ignorant video by two individuals that have an inaccurate limited understanding of this religion .
If you had chosen to create a video on this matter you could have at least gotten someone who knew more about sikhi rather than the guy in the video .
It's interesting as a Muslim Punjabi hearing their belief, it a relatively new religion, and muslims were established in the region, definitely has a lot of Muslim influence. Even the language influence into Punjabi through the movement of islam is obvious. But hindi can differentiate it self from urdu and become difficult to understand, and there is a massive movement in India to distinguish hindi from urdu
sponsored by Capri-Sun
Soon someone will try to attack capri-sun's supply to make Mohammed hijab weak😂
Guru Nanak sahib ji did more miracles then any other prophet 😊go and see in Pakistan for a proof of big stone which is got hand ✋ print of him , this only can be done by a true guru. Coz true guru is more perfect then messenger of god
The handprint was added by Maharaja Ranjit Singh in the 1800s.
Basically there is so much hate for Muslims which they call as “Turks” throughout in their scriptures ( not in GGS but secondary scriptures).
I would recommend brother hijab to read their books like Dasam Granth, Bichitra Natak, Sri gur panth prakash, history of banda bahadur etc. They use maleccha derogatory term for Muslims in their scriptures.
On the contrary the central theme of Sikhi is oneness and love for all. It also talks about how blessed are those who sing the praises of God, whether that be a muslim, hindu or christian. It also gives great advice as to how a muslim can be a good muslim (applies to any faith).
Often the passages in the SGGS referring to turks refers to the Mughal invaders who the Guru's often criticised and battled due to their tyranny.
@@rajansinghnandrha1837Well I have read all your scriptures. I can provide you references where they call all Muslims as Turks. And Hate for Turks is visible in all secondary sources. Banda bahadur’s invasion and punishment is prime example.
@@Luckymalekxd How can you make a statement like that then? When you have read the likes of Sheikh Fareed and Kabeer's shabads in the Guru Granth Sahib despite their faith. Or consider how Guru Nanak's bani was sung with his Muslim accomplice. Or when you look at history and hear of Guru Har Gobind building a mosque. Not to mention the countless points in bani where it refers to seeing the One's illumination in all etc.
@@rajansinghnandrha1837 leave it bro you donno what I am talking about.
@@Luckymalekxd Fair enough. I felt like I made very logical and justified points. Hope you have a nice day.
Incorrect. SGGS does not state that there are 8.4 million species. It says each super cycle of reincarnation is 8.4 million reincarnations long. Very poor interpretation of Sikhi and Gurbani. You should of interviewed a Sikh scholar to get an accurate understanding of Sikhi instead of scripting this interview with an amateur.
Salams , Jzkl. Enjoying the series.. I just feel there could be better preparation from the presenters.
The first brother who speaks after Hijab is very unclear. He speaks with a heavy accent, very low tone and seems uninterested. Surely there are better well researched speakers out there than him? He has appeared in the Buddhism video as well and it’s the same issue.
Agree. It's very off-putting. No enthusiasm at all
Here is a scenario a child born deaf and dumb in a slum and another child born to a monarch with all the goodies of life. Is Allah discriminatory, what does Qur'an says.
Both are trials and tribulations in its self. The poor child will go through test of patience and suffering. The rich child will go through test of gratefulness and charity.
Ahmad's knnowledge of Sikh History is weak - there are numerous books out there you can read including the standard history by Khushwant Singh - he has a multi-volume text as well as a shorter single volume text for a basic outline. Ahmad seems to lean heavily on Harjot Oberoi's book, "The Construction of Religious Boundaries: Culture, Identity, and Diversity in the Sikh Tradition".
khushwant's book has been rejected by most of the sikh scholars
@@tanveersheikh9860 if you say so
@@tanveersheikh9860 on what grounds, he provides evidence from their sources and there has not really been a counter argument from other Sikhs against khuswant singh
@@haideraliibnakhlaq8823 In English there hasn't, but Khushwant Singh himself wasn't a proper Sikh scholar, and was more of a liberal atheist in belief and praxis.
khushwant singh's books are rejected by most sikh scholars and pretty much by entire sikh population.
I knew you will do sikhism alhamdillah next time maybe more ideologies in the show in shaa allaah.
Its nice he tries to speak about Sikhi but issue is the presenter is unaware of anything Sikhi lol. His goal is to spread what he believes is Sikhi which is just his own ego, insecurities, and total lack there of any spiritual growth nor depth.
Its funny he spends 1hr to talk about Sikhi Dharma without even having an individual in the video who practices it to ask real questions lol.
His ego is what has truly pushed him away from Allah and pulled him towards his own narrow mind. Sadly, muslims who follow him will get lost in the same boat...
Next time ask questions and you will get the answers, don't make up your own stories. Anyone can easily explain what islam is about but who cares... its not my job to spread hate but rather unite with the One. hence, do the same or bring forth Sikhs who know and ask them questions.
Hope the love of Allah showers you with universal truth and his unconditional love. Wake up!
So disappointed,this being a Mo.Hijab production. The guests were "not sure" or "don't quote me" about everything. Very badly researched embarrassing actually.maybe jus get a Sikh on.💁🏻♀️
He wont lol. If you want to learn about another religion youd go to their community to learn it
The bigger the beard the more likely they are to blow us up
My man sippin on a Capri Sun
Zero research by contributors and mocking
you need a Sikh person to talk about Sikhism.
looks to me few geologists are discussing about a land which they never visited....
why did the qadiyyani episode get taken down?
Makes no sense to attempt to explain & delve into Sikhism with absolute no expertise or context 😢😮😅😊
upgraded camera equipment aint it
This is discussion was interesting... but viewing Eastern faiths through an Abrahamic lense creates its own fallacies, we must remember that in punjab culturally sikh and muslim were almost indistinguishable, so the discussion on divorce was nonsensical. This is more a civil issue then a religious one.
Almost everyone refers to Baburids as Moguls. But it’s historically not accurate. Because, Babur was grandchild of Timour, who was Turk in Central Asia. He served to Mogul military service to gain power, then conquered Mawarannahr and Khorasan together. Timur was Muslim by the way.
So my point is, Babur shouldn’t be referred as Moghul. He was a Turk who spoke Chagatai and from Central asia(present Uzbekistan, valley Ferghana).
Proud to be sikh
May Allah guide you to truth
You shouldn't
@@kamelkani4051 take ur own advice and u shouldn't be proud of ur faith either
@@sachajattpunjabi7526i see lot of people saying proud to be muslim, Sikh, Hindu, Christian and i guarantee all of you have no clue about your religion. U just say it for superiority. None of you actually want the truth
@@kamelkani4051why
I was speaking to a seikh, one that wears the dagger as well, and he was saying their objective is to reincarnate until they literally become part of god and they dont believe god is an entity, its just energy apparently. I would still double check this information
All Sikhs are required to carry the five K's, including the dagger. They are Kesh(hair), Kacha(vest), Kanga(comb), Kirpan(dagger) and Khada(bangle).
This is not true.
Sikh not siekh
If that Sikh person said that, he is wrong than.
@@rajkaranvirk7525 why
Love Sikhism
Capri sun 😄 haven’t had that since primary school!!
Why don’t you show the gentleman man?
I've been buying capri suns since primary school 🤣
Thank you for a great episode. I think if we are going to listen to other speakers, then it would be a good idea to have the camera on them. It can get boring to watch Hijab listening the entire time.
I agree, although may be the other speaker asked not to be filmed
Very childish superficial talk.
Sikhism is a sect of hinduism
Basics of Sikhi!!
There is zero continuity between Islam and Sikhism Take god, in Islam (and other Abrahamics) god is anthrophonic, in Sikhism god has no form.
A 100% completely different god
Sikhs believe in Brahman, the ALL-Pervading. A concept which originated from Shankaracharya.
Where the sikhs on this show
Ha ha Growing beard comes from Islam. Full beard and kesh ( uncut hair over head) were just like body parts for Rishis and Brahmins much before even the birth of Muhammed or Moses.
This brother always says the same first arguement in every topic talked about Sikhism which is always false. Bhai jagraj even pointed it out yet he still talks about the same points over and over again. He says sikhi is an amalgamation of both Hinduism and Islam. Yet there are only a few similarities between the two with different interpretations and views. A FEW. I can say the same thing with Islam and and Judaism and Christianity and previous other religions dating before Islam about similarities. Thsi brother will never go to a basics of sikhi person or even a knowledgeable Sikh to even learn about sikhi. He will never interview an actual sikhi who knows his information. Please be advised of scumbags like this. I do want to say however, Mohammad hijab has great speaking abilities but his voice should not be shared on knowledge he doesint know. Waheguru ji ka khalsa waheguru ji ki fateh
Hes insecure. Hence, doesn't want to learn but rather spread his own narrow mind and gossip like a child. Nice watch though shows how desperate some are to feel superior.
Its like sikhs speaking about Koran
It would’ve been better to have a Sikh explain Sikhi not Sikhism. 9:29
Interesting point is that the sikh empire was majority massively Muslim, they lived quite happily so much so that a wahhabi inspired jihad from the central provinces failed to gain much traction. Many Muslim had high ranking positions in military and government.
Yeah 50% of the population was Muslim
@@SdS-nr7if closer to 70.
@@mj897 i beilive it was 50-55% Muslim 30/35% hindu and 10% Sikh
@@mj897 and because of Khalsa rule , everyone is equal regardless of race or religion .
@Drooman Kass syed ahmad barelvi was indian and returned to punjab inspired by abdul wahhabs teaching. Is revolt failed, as local Muslims failed to sport him at large.
Where is the Ahmediyya episode got deleted?
Stupidest words I have ever heard at 40:00. Even Mohammad didn't knew about other religions except Judaism and Christianity. Mohammad didn't knew about about Hindus or Mayans or Buddhism. Mohammad didn't even speak to God like Moses, Abraham or Jesus. Angel jabraiel was the intermediary between words of God and Mohammad. On the other hand what so ever guru Nanak said God himself taught him, and orders him to spread the teachings.
But these religions were mentioned in the quran and Muhammad (PBUH)knows about Jesus (PBUH) and there were literally Jews that spoke to Muhammad (PBUH) and you’re talking how Muhammad (PBUH) did not know about them
@@Prod.EmVe02 Yes but Quarn was thousands of years ago just like other Abrahamic religions...Your Prophet never wrote the quran himself right? Nor did Jesus.
I see same issue with Christians, have a bit of knowledge but think they own the whole play of God. You guys think no one can come after...
Har Jug Jug Bhagath Oupaaeiaa Paij Rakhadhaa Aaeiaa Raam Raajae ||
In each and every age, He creates His devotees and preserves their honor, O Lord King.
ਆਸਾ (ਮਃ ੪) ਛੰਤ( ੨੦) ੪:੧ - ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ : ਅੰਗ ੪੫੧ ਪੰ. ੧੨
Raag Asa Guru Ram Das
Here it is clear, God/Allah sends/creates his devtoees when its needed in that moment. Example, Prophet Mohammed meditated in a cave right? Why and who did he connect with? Question becomes did your Prophet teach you to do the same? To meditate on the Word to connect you to the universal truth which he meditated on? Or did he connect the masses to Himself?
You need to stop defaming and stop being trapped in a narrow mind... expand... learn... grow spiritually, reach your God-self/Consciousness. The play of Allah is a lot bigger than our own egos and pride. Stop being trapped in your religion and learn what Allah does and why.
@@HarpreetSingh-jd3tu Prophet Muhammad SAW said he is the last prophet and there would be no prophet after me there have been prophecies such as the “The Song of Solomon” which mention his coming. And in terms of meditating in a cave who says when u meditate it has to be to god many athiest people meditate just for spiritual health. I personally did not know why prophet Muhammad PBUH went to the cave to meditate. But the question is how are you so sure that the Guru Granth Sahib ji is the words of god and how can you prove it? The Quran itself has so many scientific, mathematical and numerical miracles coming from a man who could not read and write and has still remained unchanged till today.
@@Prod.EmVe02 In that time yes and that faith yes not anything beyond Islamic/Abrahamic traditions. Jesus is one of your prophets too and among those yes Mohammad is the last but beyond that no. Issue is Muslims fail to even understand the message from their faith. Expand spiritually then you will get it but so trapped in the realms of your won religion you cant even understand whats said and whats not.
@@HarpreetSingh-jd3tu trust me mate we understand the message of our faith and why we do what we do
Get a sikh to explain sikhism pls🇸🇬
Why you put Malaysia Flag ?
@@satyamindnectar7052 republic of singapore
Very wrong interpretation and ill informed info. Guru Nanak last name was "Bedi" which is last name for Hindu Khatri. Beard and all keeping hair was instituted by Guru Gobind Singh ji when he made Sikh as "Khalsa". Golden Temple has four doors which represent that people from all walks of life, from all around the world, and members of all four varnas are equally welcome in this place. This is the primary difference between your religion and Sikhism.
Can anybody go to your supreme place of worship?? That explains everything.....
Please.... Refer the Gurmukhi not the English translation. And actually have debate with an educated Sikh. pointless discussion.
Sikhism is a sect of hinduism
@@SalmaiChickensays u?
@@hardipsingh1313 Yes Sikhism is a sect of Hinduism the Indian constitution declares it
Mr Hijab....if you want to know about Sikhi, then why don't engage with proper sikhs instead of these so called scholars who's knowledge is very flaky....for example the guy who said the 7th guru fought against the mughals which is not true.
This video is actually full of inaccuracies and just feeds into mis-information about Sikhs and Sikhi.
@@jagsingh1979 Sikhism is just Hinduism
31 min and they talked about nothing these are children who are having stratagem mindset u need to re do this completely how dare u not bring a ghurmukh and have these ruse kids who dont speak real evidences
where the qadiani video go
may ALLAH bless you
mohammed very disappointed the no research and way u chose to speak upon this
Its also proven scientifically the earth is round mate not flat ,i think we have to do a video on islam too
Brother hijab is gaining weight 😆😆
Muscle mass rather
💪💪💪
when he eats from your fridge then ask him why he has gaining weight. if he isn't the respectfully shut up!
@@SmileStash77 what is wrong with you man?
@@SmileStash77 alright mate calm down
he was not a muslim, and theirs stuff proving him going to mecca
What happened to the Ahmadiyya video? I was looking forward to watching it to know more about them. I’ve been told it’s actually the true Islam. Was the Ahmadiyya video deleted? Thanks
😂true lies , the man Mirza gullam openly admits that he is a liar
shut up!
@abdullah ibn thank you 🙏🏻
This video hardly explains Sikhi😂 they just want to beat round the bush as they are clearly afraid to go into depth and a deep, humble conversation with some fully practicing Amritdhari Singhs/Singhnia of Guru Granth Sahib. When it comes to Sikhi, outsiders are all surface level
@@gs-fx5zq Sikhism is just Hinduism
Due to not having any eschetalogical philosophy, their only living principle is based on eat drink and be merry and little on community contribution that's is exaggerated like ocean.
Very ignorant statement
The Ramadan, the month of feasting, where food and drink is consumed the most during the whole year
why was the Qadiani video deleted?
@abdullah ibn Jazakallah Khair aki
50:50 nails are dead at that point just like hair removed by the kanga
I have never seen more factually incorrect video on sikhism.
Basically these guys got hold of bunch of sikhs from Surrey or somewhere made their opinions. Zero umderstanding and literally wrong facts
Jazakallahu Khayran Ahsanul Jaza
Sikhs believe Guru Nanak was God. I have asked Sikhs they have acknowledged this. This is because they say Guru Nanak achieved the highest level of human inlightenment and became in one with God and was in one with God.
No
You're wrong
@@ogduck461 I am more than happy to be corrected, so let me ask you this. Did Guru Nanak reincarnate ? Elaborate on this.
As i understand this issue, he didn't as he was fully at the highest level of enlightenment.
@@mohammedkamalhussain3694 Regardless of what a few Sikhs believe, the GGS explicitly states that Guru Nanak was "God's dog" that alone should correct you.
@@ogduck461 but the question remains, did Guru Nanak reincarnate?
Many tried to describe God and talked about His incarnations Guru Nanak made it clear that God is One and He is Eternal He clarified this point. The Guru's were All in Union with God they didn't have any mediators like angels the revelation was direct from God. Why couldn't the Creator live within and outside His Creation it is not logical to restrict God the devine spark is within all beings not a laptop like a that pathetic point made there and correct me if I'm wrong but most prophets also kept there hair and a scientific study made some years ago estimated approximately 8 million species Guru's also could do miracles actually another point is we have string historical evidence if our history as it being a new revolutionary religion unfortunately akot if other religions don't have thuis Guru Nanak had full knowledge of the world the Muslim from Canada is wrong about most things the afterlife in particular we believe in heaven sachkand being in the presence of God were you don't need food or sexual desires for example if salvation is not attained then you can either be born again as human form or another form but the human form is your opportunity to attain salvation the golden opportunity we don't believe Eternal damnation we don't understand that logic as we understand God is generous and merciful we have some similarity to other faiths but are distinct and unique from all of them you bring up reincarnation a few times so let me ask you the average human lives either a day or approximately 70 yrs so this will either determine heaven or he'll fire for eternity can't see much logic or mercy with that with all due respect hope this clarifies points raised it would I guess have been more productive if there was a sikh scholar on the show
watch brothers Hashem and Mansur's videos demystifying Hinduism..
I couldn’t find the discussion on Hinduism
watch brothers Hashem and Mansur's videos demystifying Hinduism..
He speaks alot of false information about Sikhism... hajib is dishonest or uninformed.
@@jgill2589 Sikhism is just Hinduism
JazakAllahu khairan