Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Jean-Paul Sartre, Existentialism is a Humanism | Criterionless Choice | Philosophy Core Concepts

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 10. 10. 2012
  • Get Sartre's Existentialism is a Humanism - amzn.to/2GDRDa2
    Support my work here - / sadler
    Philosophy tutorials - reasonio.wordp...
    Take classes with me - reasonio.teach...
    This is a video in my Core Concepts series -- designed to provide students and lifelong learners a brief discussion focused on one main concept from a classic philosophical text and thinker.
    This Core Concept video focuses on Jean-Paul Sartre's "Existentialism is a Humanism" and addresses the issue of Criterionless Choice. Sartre's view is that, when it comes to moral or ethical decision-making, it is ultimately up to the person deciding not only to make the decision, but also to choose what criteria they will use to make the decision.
    If you'd like to support my work producing videos like this, become a Patreon supporter! Here's the link to find out more - including the rewards I offer backers: / sadler
    You can also make a direct contribution to help fund my ongoing educational projects, by clicking here: www.paypal.me/...
    If you're interested in philosophy tutorial sessions with me - especially on Sartre's thought and works - click here: reasonio.wordp...
    You can find a translation of the text I am using for this sequence on Sartre's Existentialism is a Humanism here - amzn.to/2GDRDa2
    My videos are used by students, lifelong learners, other professors, and professionals to learn more about topics, texts, and thinkers in philosophy, religious studies, literature, social-political theory, critical thinking, and communications. These include college and university classes, British A-levels preparation, and Indian civil service (IAS) examination preparation
    #Sartre #existentialism #humanism
    (Amazon links are associate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases)

Komentáře • 21

  • @GregoryBSadler
    @GregoryBSadler  Před 12 lety +1

    Yes, if you have some specific teaching resolving an issue, it seems like the matter is closed -- Sartre, though, would say that to decide to follow that teaching, to make it the key relevant deciding factor, is a subjective, ultimately criterionless choice.
    [and just for disclosure: I don't personally agree with Sartre's position on the basis of choice]

  • @GregoryBSadler
    @GregoryBSadler  Před 11 lety +1

    Well, it would be the epoch our life is in -- and you see this with people saying: well, we're now modern, so we can only think in "modern ways" -- that would be a choice, in Sartre's view. And defining for oneself what counts as "modern" would also be a choice

  • @fakk20
    @fakk20 Před 11 lety

    "In choosing myself I choose man" I've always thought that this statement expands on what you've said in the lecture (thank you very much for it btw:) about making choices on a macro level. For eg any choice I make contributes to the infinite pool of choices anyone can make and this extends to our perpetually fluctuating reality. In choosing to stay with my mother, I extend an opportunity for anyone in the same scenario to co-opt/build on my reasoning and this in itself forms a new ethical code.

  • @GregoryBSadler
    @GregoryBSadler  Před 11 lety

    Yes, Sartre does seem to think along the lines you're describing here -- by choosing for myself, and thus choosing for everyone, it's not just a matter of something similar to what Kant noted, and what led him to propose the Categorical Imperative. It is suggesting a shape or vision of what it means to be human.
    Of course, one might well do this in such a way as not to form a "new" ethical code, but to keep an older one in play, reinterpreted, new life breathed into it. Traditions do that

  • @dronegrey
    @dronegrey Před 10 lety +1

    It's cool to hear someone mention the band Rush in a philosophy video. I always wondered where they got that lyric "if you choose not to decide you still have made a choice." Always thought that was a great concept, however is that always the case though, that if you don't decide that you still have technically made a choice?

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  Před 10 lety

      Not deciding, yes, when one can decide, is at some level deciding not to choose

  • @JustinHermann
    @JustinHermann Před 9 lety

    I'm in your online class at Marist for this winter intersession. I love the Rush reference!

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  Před 9 lety

      Interestingly, it turns out that it was also a reference to Stoic philosophy -- Neil Pert (as I discovered in Stoic week 2014) is really into Stoic philosophy

  • @dirtierdog
    @dirtierdog Před 12 lety

    Great videos! Enjoy them all! Often I work out while playing this over my speakers. I've always wondered, what would Sartre say about determinism and free will? Especially with philosophers like Sam Harris arguing that we really don't have as much or any free will. He has a lecture at - watch?v=pCofmZlC72g - as well as a short book on free will, explaining modern science can predict many peoples' choices before they happen.

  • @BlackSabotage100
    @BlackSabotage100 Před 11 lety

    How would the epoch of your life be a factor of criterion?

  • @DarkFire515
    @DarkFire515 Před 11 lety

    Thanks very much for posting all these videos, I find them fascinating. The conclusion, if I may call it that, which Sartre reaches here disturbs me - if all choices are fundamentally criterionless does than not mean that all choices are therefore arbitrarily made, or even meaningless? Surely human beings are in fact incapable of making truly criterionless choices?
    Thanks again, very interesting series of videos...

  • @GregoryBSadler
    @GregoryBSadler  Před 12 lety

    Well, Sartre was a hard-core anti-determinist (or, as the people in the metaphysics/philosophy of action field use the term a "libertarian"). So, I think he'd remain unconvinced by Harris and the other people out there making such claims for science, prediction, etc.
    I myself find those sorts of claims, and the arguments/evidence adduced to back them up unconvincing.
    Most likely, I ought to do a core concept video on Sartre and freedom of will as a metaphysical matter

  • @MrMarktrumble
    @MrMarktrumble Před 9 lety

    Does choice make truth? Thank you

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  Před 9 lety

      Mark Trumble No, I don't think so. At least not in most cases

  • @GregoryBSadler
    @GregoryBSadler  Před 11 lety

    Well, Sartre tries to wiggle his way out of that sort of conclusion -- not really that successfully, in my view. One of the several reasons I'm not a Sartreian existentialist myself

  • @yasha12isreal
    @yasha12isreal Před 8 lety

    do we have free will?

    • @yasha12isreal
      @yasha12isreal Před 8 lety

      or is everything predetermined by cause and effect or nature

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  Před 8 lety +3

      That may be a false dilemma

    • @Helicopterpilot16
      @Helicopterpilot16 Před 7 lety

      Free will based upon moment rather than future... Too vague?

  • @TheYazzola
    @TheYazzola Před 12 lety

    the islamic view is more open about that .. and i quote ( a man came to the prophet asking him to join in defending the muslims the prophet asked is your parents alive ? he responded yes the prophet responded ; then honor your parents by helping them.) thx for the great video

  • @francescoficini5991
    @francescoficini5991 Před 11 lety

    lol