When Will We Finally Have Anti Gravity Technology ?
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 04. 2024
- 🔴 YOU WANT TO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL? 🔴
🤗 Join our Patreon community: / ultrafuture
😉 Or become an official Ultra Future member on CZcams: / @spacechasm
🤗 One-Time Donation?
- PayPal: paypal.me/JS2TheFuture
- Bitcoin: bc1qv4lsfsplvfecrrgvmfclhga28we7mvh9563xdj
🔗 Share the video with anyone who might be interested (it helps a ton!)
Music:
"John Tasoulas - Odyssey" is under a Creative Commons (CC-BY 3.0) license
/ johntasoulas
Music promoted by BreakingCopyright: htt ps://bit.ly/bc-odyssey-song
Neon Renegade · StreamBeats by Harris Heller
• Neon Renegade
📬 Contact us: ultra.future.video@gmail.com
#UltraFuture - Věda a technologie
😉Join our Patreon community: www.patreon.com/UltraFuture
6:49 In regard to Ning Li. She was born in Shandong, she graduated from the Department of Physics of Peking University, and in 1983 she emigrated with her family from China to the United States. When her anti-gravity research apparently was showing some results while being funded by DoD, members of the Chinese Communist Party approached her regarding returning to China to continue her research. Li rejected their offer. She was additionally forced to stop publishing or discussing her research findings upon attaining a top secret security clearance. In 2014, Ning Li was struck by a hit and run vehicle while crossing the street on the University of Alabama in Huntsville campus. This accident caused permanent brain damage that resulted in Alzheimer’s disease shortly after. On July 27, 2021, Ning Li died at the age of 78. There is some speculation the CCP was behind the hit and run accident.
I think the best application of artificial gravity, not just anti gravity, would be efficient nuclear fusion
Gravity is not a force, it's acceleration.
Holy shit! The narrator sounds exactly like the guy doing a history YT channel! (Maiorianus to be exact)
Some sort of Propulsion That manipulates air molecules.
In about 10,000 years.
I think they should consider density and factor in.
room temperature super conductors would make so much feasible. Mag lev isn't really anti-grav, but it might as well be. And Room Temperature super conductors would make that easily popular.
We would need an understanding of Gravity it's deepest level (a quantum or similar explanation) Generally relativity math allows for "white holes"...curving space-time enough to lift a Delorean would take lots of energy or negative mass.
Today's developers are overthinking gravimetric manipulation. Just hitch your wagon to the stars.
Do the maths, or create the maths if necessary, first.
👍🏻😎🤖👽
Showing again, that easy physics is too hard to grasp for you.
1st one here. We have developed advanced material sciences that defy our past imaginative capacities of the 1960s. That's evident by looking at the crude computers and control systems that were envisioned to be futuristic in sci fi movies and TV shows of the 1960s and 70s (2001 a space oddesey is an exception)
Why is the future always about new better technology? Why is no one interested in new better ways of thinking and living? Of better culture, better religion, better language, or better government? Why do we never explore those possibilities? Is there an unspoken law that those subjects are off limits? Or are we merely so arrogant as to believe that we are already at the pinnacle of the possible in those areas?
It's a very good point.
I'm old enough to remember when there were sci-fi stories that had just such societies held up as an ideal. Even OG Star Trek had them (though there was usually a catch in their 'utopias').
But these all died out along with the 'hippy dream'. In my teens, the future looked very promising - the USA just put a man on the moon, so how much further were the human race going to travel? We didn't have smartphones or the internet, but we had plenty of new-fangled gadgets to be amazed at!
And the promise held out was just like you say - more leisure to philosophise and take time to appreciate stuff. The gadgets would do the work for us.
It hasn't turned out like that.
Now it sometimes seems that we work for the gadgets!
Better tech is what facilitates better living. The two go hand in hand.
To answer the question in the title: Never. Check the latest books on physics. ;-)
BS!