Enhancing is done on the GPU. All of you who try doing it on CPUs are just out of luck. I'm suprised it runs at all on CPUs ;) I have 2x2080TI and the upscaling is about 0.8 FPS so not bad at all. 30 second clip takes some minutes and done :)
Hello I have a pretty decent pc but when passing a video either 40 seconds or 3 minutes tells me that it takes 15 to 90 hours to climb it is so or will it be my pc? Thank you.
Am I doing some thing wrong ? AMD RYZEN 5 with Vega 8 graphics and all kinds of free hard disk space on a pretty new compturer and it took like 3 hours to process 10 secs of clip = aint gonna cut it for clips over 5 mins that need to be done
it was deinterlaced in virtual dub in first place. And in became 60fps cause of that. Those lines were generated by early version of Topaz. At this point at version 0.1.8 i dont see such lines during render. Thanks for feedback
@@DudexMJFan2011 I am actually upscaling my old family recordings from DV tapes and I suggest you learn AviSynth. You can not beat QTGMC deinterlacing, it is phenomenal.
I'm not impressed as all of you. If the quality is shit, lets say below 720p, no magic software upscaler AI will not make it better. You will see artifacting, unnatural sharp filtering and cartoony objects. During lock down, I experimented with Topaz Video Enhance AI on sources from 480p to 720p. I extracted some DVDs with little bit of film grain in it and tried to upscale to 1080p and 4k. It produced worse looking image than classic Lanczos method, not mentioning you have to first deinterlace the source files from DVDs which already degrades the quality by few % (because the most common codec x264 does not support interlaced recordings and maybe neither one except mpeg2). Topaz Video Enhance AI has option to deinterlace it but if I check to upscale as well, it throws me error. So I deinterlaced in Hybrid using QTGMC + Bob method and than tried to upscale to 1080p which was pretty nice, but AI has pretty big problem with film grain, it somehow multiplies the grain as percentage of upscaled resolution increases (480p to 4k is 500% increase in pixels, so 5x more grain, like too much iso noise in photograph). I than decided to apply some filtering to remove film grain, also in Topaz, but than appeared artifacting I mentioned: unnatural sharp and cartoony objects. It really didn't know what to do with the recordings, also there was another problem with pixel aspect ratio, recordings had 16x15 bits per pixel and looks like Topaz thinks it is classic more common 1x1 bits per pixel, so rendered 4k had compression pixel artifacting not mentioning most of the presets didn't work. I was more successful rendering in 1080p but there was also problem with grain but not too much, 480p to 1080p is 250% so 2.5x more grainy images, Artemis MQ v10 works pretty well at managing grain, the image looked sharp on objects at a distance while objects nearby looked enhanced quality, but I could also see artificial objects appearing in distance. Stabilized close images looked really beautiful. Deinterlacing also didn't work. Compared to lanzcos upscaling algorithm, the picture was on par, maybe little better but lanczos took 8hours while Topaz would take 28hours and that is the biggest problem with AI, 4k upcaling would take 3days 11hours with 6core CPU. 720p to 4K looked beautiful in Artemis LQ and MQ, but higher HQ produces artificial images especially in faces. All in all, I wouldn't recommend using AI on 480p and bellow resolutions. It has a nice future but I am afraid this technology appeared too late, now every smartphone records in 4k every movie is made in 4k and you cannot use it 480p and below. You can use it 720p and 1080p which are already satisfactory for most people, so for me, I see no use for it. Maybe in gaming industry I can see some future.
i miss Michael so much :(
Just WOW.
Enhancing is done on the GPU. All of you who try doing it on CPUs are just out of luck. I'm suprised it runs at all on CPUs ;) I have 2x2080TI and the upscaling is about 0.8 FPS so not bad at all. 30 second clip takes some minutes and done :)
what AI Model did you put the video trough?
ok, this is gold
the only problem here is i dont have good GPU to fast render. 1 minute took 24 hours to render on CPU
@@DudexMJFan2011 what video editing program u use man?
@@Prodigy43211 it's written in the name of this video lol
DudexMJFan2011 please please release these concerts with MJ in this quality with the audio
@@Prodigy43211 I don't think it's possible for me to do. I don't have modern gpu for that task
Hello I have a pretty decent pc but when passing a video either 40 seconds or 3 minutes tells me that it takes 15 to 90 hours to climb it is so or will it be my pc? Thank you.
What are your specs?
OMG
Am I doing some thing wrong ? AMD RYZEN 5 with Vega 8 graphics and all kinds of free hard disk space on a pretty new compturer and it took like 3 hours to process 10 secs of clip = aint gonna cut it for clips over 5 mins that need to be done
that depends on what kind of upscaling you do and what settings you are using also
looks identical...
Looks decent, but you need to de-interlace it first. AI Gigapixel doesn't seem to know how to handle interlacing.
it was deinterlaced in virtual dub in first place. And in became 60fps cause of that. Those lines were generated by early version of Topaz. At this point at version 0.1.8 i dont see such lines during render. Thanks for feedback
@@DudexMJFan2011 I am actually upscaling my old family recordings from DV tapes and I suggest you learn AviSynth. You can not beat QTGMC deinterlacing, it is phenomenal.
I'm not impressed as all of you. If the quality is shit, lets say below 720p, no magic software upscaler AI will not make it better. You will see artifacting, unnatural sharp filtering and cartoony objects. During lock down, I experimented with Topaz Video Enhance AI on sources from 480p to 720p. I extracted some DVDs with little bit of film grain in it and tried to upscale to 1080p and 4k. It produced worse looking image than classic Lanczos method, not mentioning you have to first deinterlace the source files from DVDs which already degrades the quality by few % (because the most common codec x264 does not support interlaced recordings and maybe neither one except mpeg2). Topaz Video Enhance AI has option to deinterlace it but if I check to upscale as well, it throws me error. So I deinterlaced in Hybrid using QTGMC + Bob method and than tried to upscale to 1080p which was pretty nice, but AI has pretty big problem with film grain, it somehow multiplies the grain as percentage of upscaled resolution increases (480p to 4k is 500% increase in pixels, so 5x more grain, like too much iso noise in photograph). I than decided to apply some filtering to remove film grain, also in Topaz, but than appeared artifacting I mentioned: unnatural sharp and cartoony objects. It really didn't know what to do with the recordings, also there was another problem with pixel aspect ratio, recordings had 16x15 bits per pixel and looks like Topaz thinks it is classic more common 1x1 bits per pixel, so rendered 4k had compression pixel artifacting not mentioning most of the presets didn't work.
I was more successful rendering in 1080p but there was also problem with grain but not too much, 480p to 1080p is 250% so 2.5x more grainy images, Artemis MQ v10 works pretty well at managing grain, the image looked sharp on objects at a distance while objects nearby looked enhanced quality, but I could also see artificial objects appearing in distance. Stabilized close images looked really beautiful. Deinterlacing also didn't work. Compared to lanzcos upscaling algorithm, the picture was on par, maybe little better but lanczos took 8hours while Topaz would take 28hours and that is the biggest problem with AI, 4k upcaling would take 3days 11hours with 6core CPU. 720p to 4K looked beautiful in Artemis LQ and MQ, but higher HQ produces artificial images especially in faces.
All in all, I wouldn't recommend using AI on 480p and bellow resolutions. It has a nice future but I am afraid this technology appeared too late, now every smartphone records in 4k every movie is made in 4k and you cannot use it 480p and below. You can use it 720p and 1080p which are already satisfactory for most people, so for me, I see no use for it. Maybe in gaming industry I can see some future.
Éste tampoco no tiene audio absolutamente no se escucha nada