PHP 8.4: new without parentheses

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 21. 08. 2024

Komentáře • 24

  • @slyosrs
    @slyosrs Před měsícem +15

    I will be slapping that Rector rule in my primary project when it gets added. A nice little QoL improvement. :)

  • @vudaltsov
    @vudaltsov Před měsícem +10

    Thank you very much for reviewing my RFC!

  • @syracuse4612
    @syracuse4612 Před měsícem +7

    this was contributed by Valentin Udaltsov from PHPoint channel

  • @JohnRoux
    @JohnRoux Před měsícem

    :D Had a good chuckle at the "it didn't get any upvotes" :D
    I'll go give you an upvote Brent! You deserve it!

  • @qqleq
    @qqleq Před měsícem +4

    FINALLY!

  • @phpannotated
    @phpannotated  Před měsícem +5

    How much of your code will you be able to refactor? 🤓

    • @kayodole9411
      @kayodole9411 Před měsícem

      it can be automated with rectorPHP

  • @rhinni
    @rhinni Před měsícem

    The static constructor would especially be useful for dynamic instantiation, e.g. $className::new() vs new $className() due to IDE and static analysis support. At least right now in PHPStorm $className::make() has IDE support for me, new $className() does not

    • @phpannotated
      @phpannotated  Před měsícem

      I'll check with the team if we can improve this 👍

    • @phpannotated
      @phpannotated  Před měsícem +1

      I checked, apparently it works in simple cases, what was your specific use case where it didn't?

    • @rhinni
      @rhinni Před 16 dny

      ​@@phpannotated I don't remember, but maybe it's mainly just being able to click on the ::make() part to go to definition, while you can't click on the braces in new $className()

  • @CottonInDerTube
    @CottonInDerTube Před měsícem +1

    new MyClass()() opens up for typo or replacement errors.
    Im not a fan of (new MyClass())->... , but also dont really like the new new MyClass()->... .
    I stick to $object = new MyClass(); $object->... .

  • @0zankurt
    @0zankurt Před měsícem +5

    It's just reducing the readability, I hope they don't turn this into typescript...

    • @_codito
      @_codito Před měsícem

      Yeah, because JavaScript and readability go hand in hand 😅.
      (foo[bar?'baz1':'baz2']())().buzz()

    • @phpannotated
      @phpannotated  Před měsícem +6

      Oh I hope they do!! 🔥

  • @theargentum
    @theargentum Před měsícem

    Cool. Still waiting for some real improvements like damned function overloading...

    • @phpannotated
      @phpannotated  Před měsícem

      Personally not a fan of the idea of function overloading, but that might change if they ever get added :)

    • @barneylaurance1865
      @barneylaurance1865 Před měsícem

      Do you mean double dispatch? I don't see how you can have compile time function overloading when variables are dynamically typed.

    • @theargentum
      @theargentum Před měsícem

      @@barneylaurance1865 No, I mean function overloading. So I wont have to write ugly ifs with func_*() functions. I'm not quite sure what you mean about compile time, because php is an interpreted language (did you mean parsing?). Nevertheless in php we have precious type-hints that really work

    • @barneylaurance1865
      @barneylaurance1865 Před měsícem

      @@theargentum PHP does have a compiler, its just very fast so you don't notice it running.
      I think what you're talking about is indeed double dispatch - meaning the function to call is looked up not just bye the type of the parameter on the left of the arrow as it is now but also by the type of the param(s) on the right.

  • @tagKnife
    @tagKnife Před měsícem +2

    I dont like it.
    It makes the scope of the class ambigious. That was the purpose of the brackets. To tell the developer "Hey this expression wont exist when the brackets are closed!"

    • @phpannotated
      @phpannotated  Před měsícem +4

      Well the RFC explains how that ambiguity already exists in PHP without the RFC, so it doesn't really make a difference.