Harley Bearing Timken Conversion VS Roller Bearing Performance Bagger Dyna FXR FXRT

Quick description of the difference between timken style case bearings and roller bearings
Subscribe to see more from ‪@jcsperformance2778‬
Instagram and Facebook: @jcsperformance59
JCS Performance
11 S 5th St
McAllen, TX 78501
[phone]

[@Thegoodguy2004]

Great video thanks for the info

[@drooge42]

exactly

[@timothyweiss619]

Thanks for the info, but I say Timken bearings all the way, everyday. There a superior bearing regardless of rpm your running and easy on the pocket book.

[@moglie431]

Would you say run timken on a stunt setup?

[@jcsperformance2778]

Yes, definitely!

[@Anonymouso283]

I’m sure you’ve heard everything about the Timken vs INA bearing argument. I’m leaning Timken, they’ve been doing it for 50+ years and when they started using INA bearings, the cranks were starting to have very bad run out, bearings were failing, so on and so forth. I’m doing a Timken conversion on my originally 88 (now a 100ci with a dark horse crank) and I’ll let you know how it goes brotha. Hopefully all goes well.

[@Anonymouso283]

My 88 crank had crank runout of 45’ thou. If it had the timken in there, I doubt it would’ve gotten that high, considering the Timken is proven to support your crankshaft from axial movement, meaning as the crankshaft goes down, a lot of pressure is put on the bottom of the cage of the INA bearings, which is real real bad and can get you in a lot of trouble. Timkens are (I’ve heard) to be the solution to everything.