Watch Live: WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Day 4 - On The Stand - Ofc. Pep Moretti - Kenosha PD
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 08. 2024
- Live Coverage: WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse - Kenosha Shooting
Happening in Court
Direct Exam of Jason Lackowski - Friend of Ryan Balch - With Defendant Prior To Shooting
Direct Exam of Amber Rasmussen - DNA Analyst
Direct Exam of Susan Hughes Anthony Huber's Great-Aunt
Arguments Outside Jury Presence
Direct Exam of Kariann Swart - Rosenbaum's Fiancée
Kariann Swart - Sahil Khindri - Car Dealrship Owner
Direct Exam of Sahil Khindri - Father Owns Car Source
Direct Exam of Anmol Khindri - Father Owns Car Source
Direct Exam of Ofc Erich Weidner - Kenosha PD
Direct Exam of Ofc. Jeffrey Van Wie - Kenosha PD
Direct Exam of Ofc. Pep Moretti - Kenosha PD
Charges:
1. First Degree Reckless Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Joseph Rosenbaum)
2. First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Richard
McGinnis, reporter for Daily Caller, not injured but near Rosenbaum when Rittenhoue
fired)
3. First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety, Use of a Deadly Weapon (unknown male)
4. First Degree Intentional Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Anthony Huber)
5. Attempt First Degree Intentional Homicide, Use of a Deadly Weapon (Gaige
Grosskreutz)
6. Possession of a Dangerous Weapon by a Person under the Age of 18
7. Fail to Comply with Order of Local Government - Emergency Management Activity
(citation, carries no penalty) - everyone present was breaking the 7pm curfew issued by
the sheriff.
JURY CHOSEN IN ONE DAY. 20 jurors have been selected in WI v. Kyle Rittenhouse. 9 men and 11 women. (8 are alternates)
Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 26, and Anthony Huber, 26, and injured Gaige Grosskreutz, 27. Prosecutors say that Rittenhouse, then 17 and from Illinois, was a vigilante looking for a fight. He, like other right-wingers, went to Kenosha, Wisconsin ostensibly to protect property. This happened as protests over police shooting local man Jacob Blake turned violent. Rittenhouse’s attorneys assert he was acting in self-defense. This case became a cause célèbre among conservatives.
Prosecutors have struggled in court, failing to introduce evidence of prior aggressive behavior. This included evidence showing him attacking a woman who was in an altercation with his sister. The other is that he was closely linked to the violent, far-right Proud Boys organization.
Kenosha County Judge Bruce Schroeder said an appellate court would reverse him if he allowed these in trial. The evidence was too prejudicial, he said. He left it up in the air whether he would allow footage showing someone identified as Rittenhouse discussing a Black man exiting a CVS pharmacy. Rittenhouse believed the man was shoplifting.
#KyleRittenhouse #KenoshaShooting
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on CZcamsTV!
tv.youtube.com....
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.co...
Who To Follow On Twitter:
@LawCrimeNetwork
@LawCrimeVerdict
@Cathy Russon
@AddiTrialsStuff
⏰ Time Stamps ⏰ updating as I go:
15:27 - video starts - notes from jury
21:48 - Jason Lackowski - Friend of Ryan Balch
1:04:35 - Cross of Jason Lackowski by defense
1:31:34 - Break
1:52:44 - Redirect
2:02:14 - Recross
2:07:26 - Prosecution is allowed 1 final question
2:08:50 - Amber Rasmussen - DNA Analyst
2:31:18 - Cross by defense of Amber Rasmussen
2:37:24 - Susan Hughes - Anthony Hubers Great-Aunt
2:52:22 - Lunch Break
3:46:26 - discussion outside jury presence
4:02:52 - Jury Returns
4:05:15 - Resume Direct of Ms. Hughes
No Cross
4:08:04 - Kariann Swart - Rosenbaum’s fiancé
4:20:12 - Skips suddenly to arguments outside jury presence
4:27:40 - recall Jury to Cross Ms. Swart
4:32:39 - Redirect
4:35:56 - Sahil Khendri
4:44:49 - Cross
4:52:22 - Redirect
4:58:41 - Recross
Sahil Kendri causes mass confusion the whole time he’s on the stand. Did they mean to subpoena his brother maybe?
5:01:22 - Amol Khendri - ok now I’m really confused cause here’s the brother? These 2 brothers have me lost with their nonsensical answers! What is with these two?!
5:24:30 - Break
5:47:43 - Cross
6:16:12 - Officer Erich Weidner - Patrol Officer & Evidence Technician - Kenosha PD
6:31:12 - Cross by defense
6:33:15 - Redirect
6:34:54 - Recross
6:36:50 - Officer Jeffrey Van Wie - Crime Scene Tech - Kenosha PD
6:46:02 - Cross
6:50:44 - Redirect
6:52:00 - Officer Pep Moretti - Patrol w/Kenosha PD
7:11:04 - Cross
7:20:48 - Redirect
7:23:45 - Break for the day - release jury
Good man
😻😻😻😻😻😻 Love people like you who do this for us!!
@@theladyinblack3055 thanks! But to be perfectly honest I do it for me lol Makes it easier to go back and find things and helps me pay attention 😊
You don’t get enough credit! Love ya!
I have seen a number of people spouting some misinformation, and I would like to clear this up. The AR-15 is a semi-automatic rifle, just like 95% of all firearms today. It is not and has never been a military weapon. There was M16A1 and M16A2 and now there is M-4, unless it has been updated again. The AR in AR-15 stands for ArmourLite, the manufacturing. All military rifles have a multi-selector switch that goes from single shot, 3 round burst, and fully automatic. AR-15's do NOT have the 3 level selector switch that military grade rifles have. AGAIN< AR_15 HAS NEVER BEEN AND IS NOT A MILITARY GRADE RIFLE. It is basically a .22 on steroids. When hunting, you can only use it for small to medium game, and it is argued that it is not ethical for deer hunting. So anything smaller than a deer is prime for the AR-15. Please, educate yourselves on firearms before spreading misinformation and feeding the rumor mill. My wife was against guns until I took her to a handgun safety course. Now she loves it and has her own Glock that she calls "Heather Glocklear". Education is key to eroding fear.
Oh thank you for that information I'm from the uk we dont have guns so that information let's me better understand it isnt a machine gun or army rifle .
good to know that your wife likes guns. thats the most important part about your statement
I think the judge had already tried to explain this to the jury during the jury selection, but I think he should have mentioned that semi-auto is the same mode of fire as most pistols have. This type of AR-15 style rifle is just a long pistol that is a bit more handy for distance shooting, and much less handy if you defend against melee attackers for a simple reason of how unwieldy it is. A rifle is useless in close-quarters, if you miss a skateboard to your head, or even just a good punch, you may just as well count yourself unarmed.
Heather Glocklear..😉love that!
@@laylarosexxx7467 no problem. Sorry I'm late to respond. A semi automatic is essentially all firearms. Revolvers, technically are not semi automatic, but they function the same as a semi automatic: one trigger pull, one round fired. Even the military rifles can function as a semi automatic. I served in the Army, the M16A2 that I was issued (like all military general issue rifles) has a 3-level selector switch. The AR-15 does not. The selector switch on the military rifle allows for semi automatic, 3 round burst, and fully automatic. Semi automatic is one pull, one fire. Three round burst is one pull, three rounds are fired. And automatic is one pull and it fires rounds until you release the trigger. Plus, in the USA, everyone that buys a firearm from ANY business (including ALL gunshows) has to go through a background check. It's a basic background check that makes sure you aren't a felon or are on any list that restricts your right to own a firearm. It covers federal and state criminal records. The ONLY time a person can buy a firearm without a background check is in private sales or gifting. So if I wanted to give my dad one of my handguns, as long as I know he is not a felon, I can give it to him or sell it to him without having to get a background check. People that are anti gun in the USA seem to think that you can walk into any store, at any age, and just walk out with as many guns as you can carry. That is just not the truth. If you have any questions about the firearm issue in the USA, feel free to ask.
You can actually watch the Prosecution crumbling in real time.
Yeah, I honestly don't get how this case went to trial. It's unbelievable how weak the charges are. I mean, the defense doesn't even need to cross examine the witnesses, they destroy their case on direct.
Kyle is a murderer
@@bigraviolees not guilty..actually watch the trial next time 🙄
@@awright119021 a not guilty murderer, like OJ
The prosecution did more to help Kyle than the defense did lol
Wow. The prosecution is doing such a terrible job. I don’t understand anything they are doing or why they are doing it. Where is all the evidence that will go to the fact that Kyle was negligent or reckless? They have shown absolutely NOTHING of substance and there have been absolutely NO good arguments. All they are doing is trying to prove emotion for people that already have a bias. Except it’s not going the way they planned.
The only thing they have proven is that the aggressors were not Kyle, the police are INCOMPETENT, and the witnesses are either liars or proving the defenses’ points.
They can't produce evidence that does not exist 🤷♂️
I don't know why they put up this clown show, in the first place.
And, yes, their only viable tactic is to get people to feel sorry for the aggressors, but anyone with a couple of functional brain cells can look at the video footage and discern what's going on
One small issue - no evidence Rosenbaum touched his gun as he lunged for it (the Daily Caller guy said he might have grazed it)- a jury might conclude Kyle could have run off b/c Rosenbaum would have landed on the ground. I know it happened so fast etc but I worry for Kyle
@@GJH1010 He doesn't have to touch his gun. The second he lunged at Kyle, Kyle was legally allowed to light him up.
@@GJH1010 So Kyle should have waited until Rosenbaum touched his gun? :/
@@Red23UK Well, Rosenbaum died doing what he loved, chasing minors.
The car dealership guy lied thru his teeth.
They're used car salesman, so that's not surprising.
The brothers, “Car Doctor” and all the businesses associated with them need to be investigated for business corruption / Lieing under oath.
RIGHT ,lol absolutely lying
I'm curious as to how all these armed strangers obtained keys (and likely an alarm code) to his car source location. Further why leave cars on the lot after the other location had been hit by rioters? I suspect insurance may have been a motive... Id' trust sushi from a gas station before I believed a word that came out of these two's mouths.
They likely got a start up business loan compliments of our crooked over paid legislature’s and they can change over the names of the business every so many years to avoid paying the loan. It’s legal too. Meanwhile American born citizens that have paid into the system for generations can’t get the very same assistance!
Those two brothers who owned the car lots are lying and denying through their teeth. You can read it all over them, even in their body language, something even a small child could pick up on.
That testimony was painful for everyone in the room to endure, worse than pulling teeth without any Novocain. The older brother started to slip up more toward the end from his "I don't know and can't remember anything" story. I hope those two brothers get what's coming to them for throwing Kyle (and the rest of the group that night) under the bus after protecting their property/assets for them. If they have struggles with a lawsuit already due to the insurance companies not paying out for their damaged cars and property, just wait and see what happens for lying under oath - for starters.
Anyone else smell insurance fraud here? 137 cars burning could be seen from space.
@@pp312 Their insurance doesn't cover arson apparently.
@@pp312 me and the missed were like 👀😬 somethings NOT right with there stories, and fraud was what I 1st thought of.
@@Serfdomftw I work @ a car dealership they put full coverage insurance on all their merchandise plus on some cars a tracking device so know your roll shut your mouth. It’s a Business insurance and any of your property get damaged they will pay it isn’t a car insurance.
@@garrettleonidas8702 doesn't mean that Car Source had "business insurance" that covers arson.
"We were together all the time but I haven't seen him for a week" 🤣🤣🤣. This case is outrageous
Yup, because she had a restraining order against him.
Yeah, you know guys, that thing that totally normal people do, when they get a restraining order on some one and then, you know, hang out with them....................🥴🤯🦄💉🚬💊
Sounds like he was hospitalized for a week..
@@TLL921 probably in "hospital" because he found it hard to live with himself knowing he was a fkn nonce.
@@TLL921 Well he was in the hospital. That’s been mentioned numerous times in the news. Hence why he was also walking around with a “hospital bag.”
Ppl saying getting hit by a skateboard is not life threatening. I wish they can try it themselves.
Are you comparing a skateboard to a rifle?
@@llm4187 Do you think it is possible to kiII someone by bludgeoning them over the head with a blunt object?
@@llm4187 lol, just put yourself in the situation. You do have a rifle in your hand. But someone still came to you and smash a skateboard into your head. What will you do?
@@llm4187 Both are deadly weapons when used appropriately. I'd be happy to hand you Kyle's rifle and take you with a skateboard under the same circumstances. Why? Because after my first hit, you wouldn't have a skull.
@@tokopaaisen2927 Well in this scenario had a just shot and killed an unarmed man?
Everybody is wondering if they could have saved on legal fees and just let the prosecuter win the case for the defendent.
Not everybody.
Binger is the only one who gets it.
The defense is very disorganized. So is the judge.
@@diegoflynn6215 silence foreign boy.
@@berettaroadchronicles9637
Who the f are you?
The judge is a disgrace. So is the defense.
The killer is trash and doesn't belong on public streets.
@@diegoflynn6215 triggered, or just big mad?
They must forget he’s not a magician, he knows there’s no case and that it’s being pushed by politics
"[Kyle] shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, an unharmed man. The shot that killed Mr. Rosenbaum, was a shot to the back. This occured, after the defendant *chased down* Mr. Rosenbaum and confronted him while wielding that AR-15."
-Thomas Binger's opening state... Sorry, lie. Opening lie.
This is them making an example of someone:)
@@BornIn80sGrewUp90s
And trying to create a precedent, to prevent people from being able to self defend, during _'peaceful protests'_
Every witness the prosecutor brings forth and then attacks makes the defendent look more like a victim. It's amazing. I've never seen anything like it before. The property owners are coming across as opportunistic, lying scum.
@@suzintex2002 100%!! My thoughts exactly!! Almost as if the state AND defense are conspiring, as crazy as that may sound. Look, the bottom line is, Kyle was defending himself and the MAJORITY of Americans know this FACT!!
Lies are all the state has
The state’s face when they realizing the HUGE mistake they made by bringing up Rosenbaum’s medications!! 😂
LOL, priceless!
@@electricpaper269 but he was close with his elderly great aunt when he needed rides and cash. Huber was a good boy. They all are, aren’t they?
If the jury would have seen how that played out they would have interpreted that information so different from how it was ultimately represented to them. The state did damage control once the jury heard about this info it sounded like a nothing burger " so this was normal medication that he took for a long time period of time" ( nothing to see here folks just a regular normal event the defense is trying to lead you to read into) it is frustrating that our system and laws are so based on a lawyers ability as how information flows to the people who are tasked with serving justice based on that information. As it was important what medication he was on and why he was on it as it shows and supports that rosebonem was unstable like the witnesses stated and medically that to was true. So much so he was being treated with medication because of his mental issues and was just put back on that medication that his lived ones felt helped in the past however him being treated again with this medication was a recent thing and not a long term solution as it was presented by the state.
Gabapentin is a pretty interesting medication to be on alone, sorta what I refer to as a "Jack of all Trades" as it's prescribed for many different things, including Bi-Polar disorder.... but did the GF indicate RoseyBum was also on Effexor? Was he taking both medications at the same time? If he was, that's a total doozy 😳
@@donaldritter3875 im on gabapentin for nerve pain i have MS
I like the way this channel calls this the "kenosha shooter" case.
This is a self defence case. Not a mass shooting.
They should call it the baby face killer case
@@arnesste000 Baby Faced Hero who took out an unapologetic child molester.
@@Kehvan Yup a ginger kiddy fiddler yelling the n word on repeat at the scene, while threatening to kill kyle. Kyle did gods work that day. A shame this went to court.
Kyle is a dbl killer
@@Kehvan f u he murdered two and wounded one
Skateboards are built sturdy enough to take a beating. That makes them sturdy enough to deliver a beating too.
So are timex watches
Takes a licking and won’t stop ticking
@@arnesste000 You take a licking and keep on picking, kids to deliver.
I didn't think Kyle's defense could get stronger and then the prosecution called their witnesses. 🤣😂
Next on the stand… the local garbage truck driver
Actually, I'll be interested in the coroner. I think Rittenhouse may be guilty of second degree intentional homicide against Rosenbaum on the grounds of imperfect self-defense: he used unreasonably excessive force against Rosenbaum.
@@roberthanna3012 there is no such thing under Wisconsin law. Once Rosenbaum started chasing him, Kyle was justified in using any and all force necessary to make him stop.
@@pwrserge83 There is, but it's not called that. If you use force under self-conditions that is unreasonably excessive, you will not be guilty of first degree intentional homicide, but second degree intentional homicide. In most states -- including the one where I practiced -- it's called imperfect self-defense and it reduces murder to manslaughter; Wisconsin is different. You cannot match a threat with the same force; it's what is reasonably believed necessary to stop the threat; and a jury could go two ways here. One is that it's unreasonable to have fired more than one shot at Rosenbaum without a significant pause, if you see him falling away from you after the first shot. On the other hand, you might fire multiple shots to "make sure" without parsing it that finely. There are likewise different interpretations of what Huber and Grosskruetz intended -- disarming and apprehending, or lynching; and there are different interpretations of whether 815 comes into play. Rittenhouse definitely has the inside track on this -- it's a mess, and all he has to do is raise a reasonable doubt, and he does look a bit like a cherub. But I agree that the prosecution's case seems weaker than advertised.
@@roberthanna3012 chasing someone and attempting to take their weapon is an act of deadly force. Therefore its legit selfdefense. Not to mention Rosenbaum promising to kill him if he caught him alone.
I’m anti gun... but I have to say that Kyle should be found not guilty. The people that provided the gun should be charged with providing this weapon (which I believe they will) but anyone else in his position would have done the same thing. Definitely self defence.
I am the opposite, I am pro responcible gun ownership And would have thought he was innocent UNTIL HE OPENED HIS MOUTH
@@carrielee962 well you were wrong and he was not guilty
@@carrielee962 that's the reason your family thinks you suck
@@carrielee962 I keep hearing the words "responsible" and "common sense" being thrown around when discussing how to infringe on my inalienable right to keep and bear arms. Could you please explain what those words/phrases mean in relation to gun control?
He’s job is inventory hence he would know the value of the losses
Hes Indian an ge Definitely knows numbers
@@BM-hb2mr Wiliness is an Indian trait.
He seems a little uhh simple tbh
An inventory mgr would without doubt know how much each item in the inventory was worth!
*rubs eyes, blink blink* Did the State actually hire Littlefinger as a prosecutor? Every time the Judge says "Mr. Binger" I literally hear "Littlefinger" 😂😂
Sammmmmme. Omg he’s dreadfully boring and takes 20 questions to get to the point. I’m sure the jury is SNOOZING away during his questioning. I know I would be. 💤 🥱
@@WatchTashi maybe the prosecutor wants to bore the jury so much that they will vote guilty just to end their own suffering?! 🤣
I saw that too, he is littlefingers double. Imagine he came to court dressed like him for a laugh.
Binger is stunning. He wants the jury to realize that all these people are hiding their own illegal acts on that night. He has to work with a motley crew of liars and vigilantes for witnesses. The defense is very confused and disorganized. So is the judge.
@@diegoflynn6215 bruh? Are you watching the same trial we all are?!
Now for all you that say kyle shouldnt have been there? First off this is america and kyle has every right to be in any city town state whatever. Oh 8 o lock cerfew??? Ok please point out to me which person that got shot was sappose to be there?.
Funny how someone commented just that, moments after your comment 😂
Sure, had he stayed home, he'd be safer. But the same is valid for someone who gets ran over, crossing the street. Or someone who gets shot, trying to take away the riffle of an armed individual.
@@roulettegenie4379
Still has the right to self defense, as it's not a felony.
@@roulettegenie4379 So? So give him the ticket that goes along with it.
You are engaged in a "Two Wrongs Make a Right" fallacious argument. The fact that others broke curfew doesn't negate the fact that Kyle did too and should not have been there.
Yeah and I say to these idiots: the RIOTERS shouldn't have been there in the 1st place.
Either way...fact is both parties were there and nothing refutes his right for self defense after what had happend to him!
"The state believes that Mr. Huber is a hero." Some state you guys have there...
Right? Holds his family at knife point to “clean the house” great guy. Not even sure why his aunt was called to testify as she had no information relevant to the case.
@@berettaroadchronicles9637 I think she was meant to be a character witness, but the defense argued they should be allowed to present countervailing argument and the judge said he was inclined to agree, so the prosecution scuttled their plan.
@@mattmexor2882 yup they really screwed up and now this can be used in closing arguments for how they tried to pull at heart strings by trying to paint the guy as a nice guy, which he has a significant history of being the opposite.
@@mattmexor2882 in wisconsin we lock murders up this ain’t Florida or Texas !
@@berettaroadchronicles9637 because they wanted to show that he didn't have the skateboard as a weapon. She was there to prove he always had it... As if that changes the fact that he used it as a weapon. 🤦🏼♀️
Man no wonder why they wanted to burn down the Car Sources. Shady AF
Geez that one brother is such a liar
I love that judge. . Kyle has conducted himself very well
His conduct in the streets got him where he is now ...
@@jancezkiewicz.r6215 is that an argument? Literally everyone gets where they are as the result of their conduct. That includes Rosenbaum and Huber as well.
The prosecution takes forever to get nowhere.
Welcome to the broken and corrupt system we call "Justice"
The judge even commented on that and said something about the trial lasting 2 weeks. It wasn't clear what he said, but I think it's safe to assume that he's now concerned 2 weeks won't be enough.
The guy knows he doesn't have a case, so he's delaying his inevitable defeat 🤷♂️
@@estupor9081 doesn't have a case? He shot an unarmed man to death while illegally carrying a semi automatic rifle. He's already in trouble, they are just trying to get him for the bodies now.
@@rienp824
Do you know how much that trouble, illegally carrying a riffle, amounts to, though?
@@Jem253
He brings in irrelevant witnesses (like Huber's grand haunt), that have no way of testifying to the facts of the case, just to try to pull at the heart strings of the jury. And time and time again keeps backfiring on his face...
The brothers trying to deny everything because they could get sued by the victims’s families
It would be a short case. Criminal acts vitiate liability.
They had more waffles than the Waffle House.
That was my thought as well
Who's the victim
@@timothyotte7959
Kyle
The car lot brothers are doing all to separate themselves from the case,, including playing dumb!
not hard for them to do...just look at them...ever meet a call centre worker that didnt play dumb?
I don't know if it's just playing.
What is a" hero," a person that puts there own life in danger regardless of common knowledge that thay could get hurt. Kyle Rittenhouse looked out for the safety of Kenosha Residence when their political
leaders failed. God bless Kyle Rittenhouse, and the people of Kenosha.
Kudos to the prosecution ! They seem well prepared and appear to be exceptional defense attorneys. Hope Kyle appreciates their effort.
Prosecutors are the best people on Kyle's team. I dont think he personally wants to convict.
@@jaykenyon1
Not only is the prosecution on Kyle's side, the trial is being held in Kenosha and the jurors are all from Kenosha. Go figure .
If the prosecution were really on his side they wouldn't have charged him with a serious crime. The case is extremely difficult for the prosecution. It's one thing to not bring charges in a high profile case everyone is paying attention to. It's another thing to win a case that everyone is paying attention to that never should have been brought because it's a losing case. They brought the charges because they were afraid of political fallout and civil unrest if they did not. Now these prosecutors are left holding the bag. And Mr. Huber is their hero.
@@mattmexor2882 They over loaded him with charges on purpose. No jury would ever convict Kyle after seeing the videos.
@@danielbrown8602 Yeah they care about him so much they charged him with life when it's anyone's guess what a jury is going to do in a tinderbox city where people riot for days on end and the police can do nothing. They want no more riots. That's what they care about most. The best way to achieve that is for Rittenhouse to be convicted. But regardless, they had to charge him, from their point of view of expedience.
So strange that an former employee (from “years ago”) would enlist a group of friends to rally around and protect used car lots with lethal weapons against a mob of determined criminals at the request of absolutely no one.
I suspect no one is going to line up to protect his "10 cars" and their car lots, next time _'protests'_ break out 🙄
There is definately something very odd about the car lot owners testimony. My personal suspicion is that they think they will get sued, and or som dodgy insurance issue or similar problems with the running/money/tax/liability of the businesses. But that's just my vibe.
Any time a question came up he didn’t want to answer he acted like he needed it repeated repeatedly so he could think about his answer.
I definitely think it’s liability issues, and it’s sad that they are more concerned with being sued than answering questions honestly under oath when a young man’s life is on the line- especially a young man who was only trying to help the owners of the dealership.
Good guys shoot bad guys.
@@jd4000 I don't exactly know the facts of the law on that, but someone did mention something that makes sense to me: if Kyle is found to have acted in self defense, then there are no grounds for them to get sued, because the people who died were the aggressors.
On the other hand, if they are proven to have committed perjury, and it appears of their testimony contradicts interviews they gave at the time, and if they succeed (let's hope not) in throwing Kyle under the bus, then it opens the doors for civil suits.
The only testimony about anyone grabbing the gun was that they grabbed the barrel. Isn't it interesting Prosecution didn't provided the DNA examiner any swabs of the barrel.
It's as if Prosecution didn't want any evidence of anyone grabbing the barrel of Kyle's rifle.
Hmmmm
@@speakwithonevoice636 they don’t wanna admit that.
@@speakwithonevoice636 We'll have to see how the additional gun charge pans out. If you're trying to argue that the gun was illegal because Kyle was 17, I think you're wrong. The law you're trying to use is, Must be 18 to 'buy' a long gun'. But Kyle did not buy the gun, his older sister's boyfriend did.
If the law was minors can not handle or operate a long gun that would mean every father that took his minor child hunting (Which is VERY common) they'd all be breaking the law.
@@speakwithonevoice636 Quit lying commie and read the statute. The gun was perfectly legal. Oh, and the 2nd amendment called, there is no such thing as an "illegal" gun.
@@pnscar3 "she shouldnt have been wearing a skirt"
literally the logic you morons are using.
@@speakwithonevoice636 First, articulate rebuttable...
Why is the gun illegal?
Why do they call Kyle a shooter. A shooter is someone who intentionally shoots and kills. Kyle was defending himself. Smh
The brothers lied under oath . Kyles BF and Kyle were dropped off at the dealership. How else would Sams name be mentioned by Kyle’s bF On day 1 of trial ? Brothers/Father are going to face a big lawsuit by the families.
Yeah, they're not convincing liars. Very shaky and no confidence. And they're contradicting statements they gave, before the trials, so, there's that 🤷♂️
But there's a loophole in the oath that they can exploit: "so help me God." 🙄
They will be sued but hopefully they win. They might not have much of a case if Kyle walks.
But no one will have their backs just like they turned their backs on kyle.
The inventory manager would immediately be able to say honestly if there was damage, & to which of his parents properties!
and it is only natural, that you discuss a loss or damage with your parents and in the course ask how high the damage may be
Absolute clown show , the prosecution had absolutely no case from day one .
Sam Khindri definitely comes across as a typical used car dealer..
He seemed allergic to the truth.
Right? I also took note of him saying *"I didn't...."*
Just because HE didn't, doesn't mean it didn't happen. This brothers did NOTHING for the prosecutor.
Car Dealer owners are OBVIOUSLY lying their azzes off!!!
They're probably more afraid of their father that committing perjury.
"Uhh...Can you repeat the question? Ummm... I don't know...I don't remember."
"No, after losing over two million dollars of inventory, I did nothing like hire security to keep the business my entire family depends on from being completely destroyed."
Those 2 were almost the best part of this whole week. 😂😂😂.
I wonder if the brothers and their father jacked up the dollar loss to their car place. That is why insurance denied the claim. Let us just say, there might be more to this story. 😬
@@gentleeyes5555 please don't make things up. Follow the evidence only. Your thoughts cause problems. Lol.
@@SecularReasons My belief doesn’t make it true. Just call it a woman’s intuition. 😉
@@SecularReasons she didn't make anything up. She speculated. There's an enormous difference, & she isn't under oath here. She's more than welcome to speculate.
I think the prosecution climbed right into bed with the defense when they opened the door to Rosenbaum’s bi-polar disorder…
I think the prosecutor knows that Wisconsin is not going to let him convict Kyle. He is cheered pretty much everywhere here.
If Rosenbaum was taking Gabapentun it wasn't for by-polarism, it is prescribed as a non narcotic pain med, also used for RLS.
@@anyoneseenmybicepilostitin2727 as he should. Kyle is the actual victim.
@@speakwithonevoice636 Really? He did better than most Marines would have under the same circumstances. 8 shots, 7 hits, 2 kills, one target disabled. That's top notch performance. 5/5 promote ahead of peers.
@@Kim-tf3if Yeah, I read that but I guess the point is that mental illness has been introduced and it’ll be hard for the jury not to see it any other way now..
the only way that kyle is getting convicted is if Rosembaums extended family is on the jury
Kyle is going to prison dude Kyle is a scared little boy who made the mistake of a life time and your forgetting the two other people he shot . Accept it you will sleep better .
There’s a term in law called proportional force you can’t shoot me for slapping you , you can punch me slap me back but you can’t shot me if you kill me with a punch that’s self defense if you shoot me and kill me that’s murder .
@@arnesste000 I remember the other two rioters quite well. The one with the missing bicep will remember to never wave a gun around and threaten an armed man every time he is getting dressed and looks at his mangled arm. The other man who was intending to kill Kyle with an object made of wood and metal before reaching for his gun was appropriately taken out like yesterday’s trash. The third man who stopped short of attacking Kyle and raised his arms in a non threatening posture was not killed and is likely enjoying a cold beer and a delicious pizza right at this moment. As for your proportional defense argument? Imagine you’re at home bringing groceries through your open door and my friend and I walk in and confront you. It’s a bad neighborhood so you’re armed while carrying groceries. My friend starts swinging at your head with a skateboard then goes for your gun. Meanwhile I am getting my semiautomatic pistol out to threaten or kill you. Since we’d agree that deadly force is perfectly reasonable in this situation the question becomes does Kyle have the same right of defense away from home. I would argue that he does.
@@Sigmund1924 Kyle is going to prison , accept it you’ll sleep better
@@Sigmund1924 the last time someone tried to Rob me I laughed in his face , the dumb f--- didn’t know what to do he looked at me and walk away .
I love this Judge.
Right! Totally
No kidding! Right? He’s such an easy going funny guy
I was so proud to see justice done and Kyle found not guilty on ALL counts.
Love this judge ❤️
Worst judge I’ve ever witnessed. He’s a mess. Are you watching ?
@@tjw1861 Best judge ever. Only way he could get better is to dismiss at the end of the DA's "case" for failing to make a case.
@@tjw1861 FYI not a single human being was seriously injured that night. Only ones shot were commies, and commies aren't people, as such having no rights.
No pc bs..calling a spade a spade..
Did you notice how the owners of the car lots did everything they could to try to not answer questions? They had more waffles than the Waffle House!
I think they are going to get a visit from the IRS or insurance companies soon. They looked shady af
They are probably worried they could get a visit from rioters if they supported Kyles story
@@GJH1010
They should be more worried about getting a visit from _'peaceful protesters'_ and not having Kyle and crew to protect them 🤷♂️
The car lot owner posed for pictures with Kyle and the others.
Id guess daddy was upset with them and wanted them to downplay their involvement
I've never seen such an embarrassment of a prosecution in my life.
I saw this during the Martin trial.The DA was pressured because of politics , over charged and pretty much threw the case cuz it was wrong and unwinnable . That is this here too
The state doesn't have a case. It was clear self defense but since this is political, here we all are.
we will see if rittenhouse mans up and testisfies. that will be a clincher for me
He wont testified
@@kaoc799 it didn't happen yet. It's "testify"
I keep hearing the prosecution and defense refer to what Rittenhouse did as "wrong," but that is what this whole trial is about. There's a very good chance the killings will be found as lawful. Aside from taking the gun from his friend's house without permission and breaking curfew, I don't know of anything he did wrong.
He did have permission to take the gun. His friend was with him.
Smh. Umm. He shot 3 people, killing 2. Even in gun happy America that is wrong. The witnesses all admit they were vigilantes.
@@diegoflynn6215 so from wherever you are I take it you don’t know that law in the US and are in a country that is protected by the US.
@@diegoflynn6215 it is not wrong if it is in self defense. Let's say someone is coming after you. Are you going to say oh wait if I do something to harm them I am in the wrong and let the take a weapon from you(having heard if they get you alone they are going to kill you, beat you with a skateboard, shoot you or you going to do whatever is the way that is most likely going to stop em.
Let's also make that same situation but let's say it's the person that is dearest to your heart. You going to protect that person or let them possibly get killed.
@@berettaroadchronicles9637 I like how his friend tried to act like he had no culpability. I get it but I think he kinda did Kyle dirty.
I’m really liking the two defense attorneys. They definitely go after the state’s witnesses but not in a rude or aggressive manner. In contrast, the lead prosecutor is much more snarky with his own witnesses.
So far IMO I see no evidence to convict Kyle of anything except possibly being a minor in possession of a firearm but regardless of that he still has a constitutional right to defend himself if he feels his life is in danger 🤔
That's not what the legal right to self defense is. In this case, self defense is a justification for lethal force if a reasonable person would believe that one is at imminent risk of death or serious bodily harm, if a reasonable person would believe that lethal force is necessary to prevent that death or serious bodily harm, and if the person was acting otherwise lawfully at the time that the lethal force was effectuated (the exact wording of that differs place to place). The reasons for each of those criteria should be pretty clear from the following example:
1. Just because you say you feel threatened doesn't mean you actually were. If you shoot someone for looking at you in the grocery store, even if you personally felt that the way they were looking at you was mean, no reasonable person would believe that a shared glance is threatening of death or serious bodily harm.
2. Let's say hypothetically that a dog is charging at you to bite you. You are clearly at imminent risk. But if you shoot the dog's owner who is 50-60 feet away in addition to the dog, the lethal force used to kill the owner was unjustified because it was unnecessary to stop the harm. (This is a more clear example, but sometimes it can get complicated by "well, could a reasonable person have deduced that harm could have been avoided without lethal force, perhaps just physical force?").
3. You rob a liquor store, and a cop shows up and points a gun at you. You don't have a legal claim to self defense if you shoot the cop even though the first two elements are clearly met.
@@Indigo1559hey, not guilty on all counts.
Thanks.
Why would one have to give the angry mob any info ,the prosecution acts like the mob is the police
The prosecution is the mob in calif.....Look at America....A $250 fine if caught, if convicted of Stealing $850.00 in product....They walk in with suitcases broad daylight, fill them up, & walk out. Most of the time The stores don't even call the police anymore. They give criminals a monthly stipend....They have sanctuary cities...Criminals just move there. Problem solved. The democrats bail out criminals & drop charges, if your the right color or a demonrat.....
The car source owners family member sal seemed to answer questions vaguely I assume in fear of civil liability or criminal liability if they admit to endorving the protection the armed citizens offered and carried out to protect the car source business.
But they know they did. There HAS to be text messages, something from that night. But I’m sure the Kenosha Kops didn’t take their phones into evidence.
Agreed I know they are just scared of being sued or even the mob attacking their businesses again if they admit to wanting the armed men to help. However they should be scared of perjury charges as they are lying under oath. Already a witness testified in this case that while protecting the business some of Kyle's possessions where locked inside of one of the buildings when they returned after patrolling and checking on the other location. The person who locked Kyle's stuff inside was Sam when he said he locked up the building while stating he was unaware of any armed men protecting the business...that he did not see any men on his propertys at that time, yet somehow Kyle's things are locked inside by him. He gave Kyle a ride but says he had never seen Kyle cone on. I would not wish more harm to this family given they have already are victims of vandalism and arsonist but them not being accountable for supporting and even asking for these citizens to help them makes me want to see them with purgey charges. The armed citizens put themselves in life treating situations to help them and knowingly could have died to help protect this family's property and livelihood and they where thankful and blessed to receive such help. The family is not willing to risk or support those men in anyway even being inconvenienced by a possible civil case that they would most likely be found not at fault in to tell the truth about how the armed men ended up on their property. If they would tell the truth it would help Kyle's case that he was trying to help the community and was not acting on his own will but by request of this family that he ended up there. They should be ashamed so many wanted to help them but that they care nothing for anyone else or what results the lack of them telling the truth might have.
have you ever been in the witness box? its a very stressful situation
@@dal8963 you seem to be saying the family should lie to protect Rittenhouse. They are trying to tell it how it was 12 mths ago. The evidence is also clear kyle had no legal authority beign there armed to the teeth on his car lot in the first place. This must change the views of the jurors if they now see he was not ever permitted to come and guard the premises.
@@tjw1861 It seems to me that Sal is lying. Do you honestly believe he took a smiling picture with people he was too scared to tell to leave because they had AR-15s? Rather than take a picture wouldn't he leave ASAP and probably even inform the police that people he didn't want to be there with weapons were there on the property?
Love the slant of 'Kenosha shooter' on the thumbnail. Should just be 'Kyle Rittenhouse trial'
I think its for attention (not okay to do) to get clicks. As dishonest as that is.
Kyle is not only innocent, but a hero.
Best fire discipline I've seen outside of Iraq and outstanding even for Iraq. Only shot commies that needed shooting.
No. He was a misguided kid going into an area with a weapon, both of which were unwise.
@@maxfrank13 Given that we wound up with two commies no longer breathing, I'd call that a positive outcome.
The Indian guy is either unaware that he can say "I don't recall" or he's trying to avoid giving a particular answer. I'd bet is on the latter. I don't think he answered a single question with a coherent statement.
He carefully considered how every answer would be perceived by the people where their business are located,He and his family is playing the long game
Kyle is a hero. I hope my son will grow up like this young man.
Big ups for your username, that's hilarious
@@speakwithonevoice636 no one hopes for that. Good thing Kyle just acted in self defense right?
@@speakwithonevoice636 Every child should be murdering pedos, abusers and other degenerates.
@@speakwithonevoice636 no I hope he grows up to be the one ending them like Kyle is
@@speakwithonevoice636 i saw you in the chat at one point. man you're an idiot.
"I have 10 more cars. TEN MORE CARS!!" He is hilarious
I see so much talk about wether or not he should have been there. This is about the question of self defense, not about wether he should have been there. You don't lose the right to self defense for brealking curfew.
As for Mr Rittenhouse having the rifle, You have to be 18 to PURCHASE a rifle, but only 16 to POSSESS. Rittenhouse was 17. Case closed.
America needs more Kyle Rittenhouses and less Antifa trash.
That one cop who was with the dudes body just seems off.
He doesn't know what Kyle is trying to do, the partner is worried enough to draw his weapon on him, pepper spray him but yet they turn their back on him by driving past him.
The defendant will not found guilty,
I hope so
The Aunt did not persuade me to have sympathy for her nephew. A waste of time in my opinion.
That wasn’t sympathy, that was a character witness.
@@llm4187 Which is inadmissible. Character witnesses for the prosecution are not admissible unless the defense makes character an issue, they have not. Her entire testimony should have been stricken as irrelevant.
@@pwrserge83 Man, you are all over the place! Someone said that women didn’t get any sympathy, I replied that wasn’t why she was there.
@@llm4187 No, she was there to offer inadmissible character testimony that should have gotten both the prosecutors sanctioned.
Prosecutor grasping at straws
Oh wow reading the comments I’m astounded by the hatred some people have towards other people , so sad.
I wouldn't call commie rioters "people"...
They are trying to put an innocent man away for defending himself. Yeah we have had enough of this nonsense
Yeah, must of us don't take kindly to childrapists.
Little slip by the judge, accidentally referred to Rosenbaum as "the accused" before correcting and saying "the decedent".
....you mean 'The Kenosha Self Defense Trial'
Prosecutor has hair like a cartoon character.
It's a wanna-be faux hawk, he's the Mr. Liberal Prosecutor who is "Edgy" at best.
No perjury warnings for the brothers?! Especially Sam! Yikes 😳
Lol the more witnesses you listen to, the more you realize how innocent Kyle is 😂. All of their actions seemed to be self serving except his.
I can't believe that Sam didn't get a perjury warning. He's trying to be strategic with his answers and not telling the truth.
Sal "we got there and cried,all the cars were burnt out, Windows smashed out on the building"..
Then they put a Hummer in the boarded up building that they didn't have guarded.🤔🤔..and they were expecting more riots that night,yet Sal had photo taken with all the men that guarded all there business...
Oh Lordy,Lordy Sam is such a bad lier...his trouble is he can't say to much as they have told a different story to insurance...and come to the trial they are screwed as the lies will come out....
3rd cop... Don't usually people that get on there knees or lay on the ground being ordered to by cop/s..and not giving themselves up to cop's...if they had asked what he wanted instead of barking order's that would have helped them more...
Advanced/walked up on them with a weapon,but his hands were up and not on the weapon...he manipulate his gun?he moved it to the back of him lol so wasn't a threat to their safety..
Absolutely waste of time and taxes.
The prosecutor has absolutely nothing in his hands. There's no argument that Kyle would be identified as an active shooter here. How did a murder trial even come about? Politically motivated?
The prosecutor really seems like he don't want to be there. He basically is putting on the defenses case. These witnesses could have easily been called by the defense. No guilty or this trial is rigged.
The car lot owners are clearly lying they're trying to cover their own self's from lawsuits
your low IQ is showing.
Thanks for providing the Live feed. Kyle is innocent.
Hes a killer
@@TheKdizzle1971 Commies need killing. So Kyle did nothing illegal.
@@pwrserge83 god youre cringy, " commie commie commie " yawn
@@HB-gj7gd Tell me more about people rioting in support of an openly marxist organization led by "trained marxists" are not a bunch of commies in need of killing.
He's guilty as can be. He lied about his age. He lied about EMT certification. He illegally possessed a firearm. He was breaking a curfew and he shot someone who didn't even touch him FOUR times...
Wow... can you believe the testimony of the Khindri Bros? They sure looked like they were lying through their teeth to me. Wonder if perjury charges are going to be brought against them....
It should be investigated... especially the last one to testify, Sam .. he had a text from Kyle,...and said he'd never met him.. He purposely acted as if he didn't understand English... Anyone that lies on the stand,,for whatever reason, especially when a man's life hangs in the balance..
He definitely fits the stereotype of a car dealer..
@@stevet4564: "Could you repeat the question"... standard evasive tactic to buy time to think about an answer...
Oh please, leave it to a bunch of idiots trying to blame two people who had nothing to do with the death and injury to three men.
They really were terrible liars. None of their testimony made sense even with the prosecution.
Lol my guess is hes scared to admit that they had his blessing to be there..... The night before the fires cost his family 2.5 million dollars ..... Fuq yea he wanted an armed presence on his property i dont care what he said on the stand. Those boys had keys and he just said his dad dont speeky english so one of those brothers gave the ok. I think the defence nailed it when they asked if they wernt getting straight answers because they feared that they would be liable for someone shot on the property. If i was them i would have put up signs on the property that basicly said hey tresspassers may be shot if they were caught by armed security doing damage. Either way if the brothers were being honest then they are incompetent at best and should never have been allowed to work for daddy lol if my son was that dumb i would say sorry boy go get a job flipping burgers cause theres no way im putting you in charge of my multimillion dollar business
Watching the prosecution is like watching My Cousin Vinny 😂
Except My Cousin Vinny won his case. I don't see the prosecution pulling this off unless the DNC threatens the jury again like they did with George Floyd
@@anyoneseenmybicepilostitin2727 No I get that and remember the movie..I was just referring to the films courtroom humor…
Really, I think both sides are pretty impressive. But then again I’m not trying to get thumbs up.
@@llm4187 Do you have birthing hips?
The Utes?
the brothers from the car place in my opinion played dumb and were hiding something. They made sure to say " ex employee that didn't work there long" every time one of those guys were mentioned.
Yes. Because if they authorized, even volunteers to protect their property, they can be held liable.
@@aegeusmax3646 Not really. Criminal acts vitiate liability.
Of course, blame someone who had nothing to do with The death and injury of three men.
@@aegeusmax3646 He said there was no agreement, under oath. I guess we will have to wait till Kyle takes the stand.
@@llm4187 Yeah, and he said something else in prior interviews. Was he lying then, or was he lying now?
Still blows my mind that the prosecutor actually got up there and tried to vilify people who didn’t want to watch their community burn while the useless police and military and emergency services either did nothing or were told to do nothing.
Sal you a extended car insurance policy 🙄 😂 he's a sals man 😂😁😉 !
I feel like the defense should be doing more. Why aren't they emphasizing that Rosenbaum was more of a danger to Kyle than to the two soldiers. Especially when Kyle is alone. And they should assert that if Rosenbaum had gotten into a grapple with Kyle other people could have attacked as well. The marine says he would never perceive Rosenbaum as a threat. But then goes on to say if he tried to take his gun he'd consider that a threat to his life. Could he be any more obtuse?
The defense is emphasizing those things... That's why the attorney asked the questions he did "if he had threatened your life" "if he had been chasing after you" This isn't a time in the trial for arguments, this is a time for questioning. Later the defense will be using these admissions by witnesses to present their arguments.
Just remember the defense still has their witnesses to call as well. The prosecutor is making the case for the defense at every turn. They are so bad at this that they are calling in character witnesses for the dead which would only be relevant at sentencing. His aunt was not there so her testimony is useless. Rosenbaums fiancé incriminated herself and not Rittenhouse, she testified that she was with Rosenbaum before the events of the evening which would violate the restraining order she had against him.
@@berettaroadchronicles9637
Smh.
Hard to believe you think that the defense is doing a good job.
You don't murder people with mental health issues. Not even in gun happy America.
@@diegoflynn6215 clearly you don’t know the law nor have you watched the trial. Back to bed with you
@@diegoflynn6215 and you don't stop and ask someone if they have mental health issues as they are coming after you. Also someone being crazy doesn't give them the ability to attack ppl and not have to worry about ppl hurting them
That prosecutor should be in jail
With huber’s great aunt the prosecution wanted to portray Huber has a hero and peaceful yet didn’t want to let the defense bring up his felonies of assault. That’s having ur cake and eating it to. Something Attorney Big Mac knows well
Well, if the prosecution is unhappy, they had the weekend to write a petition for a writ mandate, or whatever they call it in Wisconsin.
"do you have concern that you or your family could be sued if you allowed armed men to protect your property?" -um.... This is the United States of America and I could literally be sued for anything (doesn't mean it won't get thrown out but...). So, I have no more concern about a hypothetical situation where I let armed citizens protect my property and someone got shot as I do for the other hypothetical situation where I may get sued if someone got shot on my property during a protest/riot and I didn't have anyone protecting my property from rioters or vandals.
Title should be “Kyle rittenhouse self defense trial”
Who released Rossenbaum from the protective cage that he was in..? Who assured he was properly medicated..? Who babysat the guy..?
Isnt that the detective that testified sitting at the prosecution table? Forgive me if im wrong but isnt that a conflict of intetest?
Some states allow it
He testified but as the lead detective he is a member of the State portion of State v Rittenhouse
That's " social media cop " . He has the hard job of watching Tick tock & Twitter videos and then testifying about them . 🙄
I'm pretty sure they all do that bc it was their case first and then the da tries it in court but idk
"It's not uncommon for Police Officers to be ambushed." 7:02:48~ Yes. Yes it IS unusual. *VERY, VERY unusual.* Unless they're working with a drunk or an incapable woman.
My LEO husband worked through the Rodney King, LA riots, and while I was worried about him & his co-workers, and they faced more challenges than typically, IF this man can't handle the job, HE SHOULD *_LEAVE._* Being a scared little bunny places EVERYONE at RISK. It sounds as if he's front-loading for a stress disability claim! You all watch: The defense is going to make mince meat out of him. I hope he gets the help he needs. But it's sure NOT the Dept's fault.
Oh Jennifer, So this is what stupid sounds like!
Ohh LMM..... project much kiddo?
@@mrbeez8631 Kiddo? I am a grown woman, wtf project much? I don’t think you know what that means.
@@llm4187 ohhh?? Wow, had us ALL fooled! You sound like a 12 year old bully calling names, 😂😂🤭
@@mrbeez8631 When did I call you a name? I am having a discussion of facts, not sure what you are doing.
The only thing he’s guilty of is having the weapon while he was under 18. This is a waste of taxpayer money
That if he didn't have, he'd be dead.
Not even that. The charge is "dangerous weapon" which specifies a Short Barreled Rifle, a Machinegun, or a Destructive Device. An AR15 is none of the above.
Even that charge is asinine as the Wisconsin statute has an exception for the type of weapon he had. And the US sends 17 year olds to wars but self defence isn't allowed?
Why is there no CC on *THIS* video…. but there is on *every other trial coverage day?*
The prosecution literally admitting Anthony Huber had his hand on the firearm. 😂🤦🏻♀️
.....can this judge read out loud ???? christ
That sal guy got hella nervous when called out with the picture. 😂 He started looking like he was tweekin.
The 2 car brothers were both terrible liars. So f’ing obvious they asked those guys to protect their businesses. Do these 2 idiots really think we are going to believe they just randomly picked 3 different businesses, all owned by the same family?
why woud Rosenbaum want to carry the bag with him to the riots instead of leaving it at the hotell? That makes no sense
Why would heRape three children? Makes no sense
The same reason he didn't stay with his fiance at the hotel that night even though she said he had nowhere else to sleep... She had a no contact order against him so he was not allowed to stay there. So he went downtown, tried to play touch butt with a minor and got 4 bullets for it.
Police backing up to avoid a guy with rifle, yells at a guy with a rifle to get off the road. :)
Police are the biggest cowards on the planet
This last cop doesn't KNOW what rating his VEST IS?!
To be fair to him, he knows the limits of the vest, which is all he needs to know, so he can be safe.
I'll use an analogy, here and I'll also assume you use a mobile phone. Do you know the battery capacity of your phone? Most people, don't, but they know how frequently they have to charge it.
@@estupor9081 It's really not that hard. Soft armor is IIa, II, or IIIa... None will stop rifle fire, but if somebody issued me a vest less than IIIa, I would punch them in the face.
@@pwrserge83 😂
I don't know anything about body armor, to be honest.
It's just that I can relate to not knowing the technical terminology used in certain areas, and such, but I do know how to apply them, though. That's all 🙄
This man Sam from Car Source is shaking like it’s 25 degrees in the courtroom 😂
Watch elsewhere...this is chopped up and missing parts!
Great title, it could also read Good guy with gun stops bad guy with gun, skateboard, and foot to the head. LMFAO 🤣😆😂
Those Khindri brothers are the exact type of witnesses the prosecution apreciates: 100% reliable and totally not looking deceitful at all...
Good thing the prosecutiors called the people that was guarding their business to testify, before calling the Khindri...
Yeah, these brown ppl gtfo
@@yuzhuocao5663 yeah, it's not like they gave interviews that directly contradicted their testimony or anything.
Note how he first Khindri answers the question at 4:46:19
He says "No", but nods "Yes".
Anyone that watches crime interrogation channels (JCS, for example) will probably know what that usually means 😂
Yeah. Me no speak English. Just take pictures with armed men on my property.
@@yuzhuocao5663 A leftist trying to make something aboutRace? How original
It's weird that Balch had a Glock at the beginning of the night, but didn't have it after all of this. And the guy shot in the arm had a Glock at the time of the shooting.
Shot in arm guy’s Glock was his own. He admitted to having an expired ccw permit at the time and that he had carried it that night
Huber was just a thrill-seeker and what's more thrilling than trying to -kill- play with someone that -can fight back- seems dangerous? C'mon, he's basically a hero! - The prosecution probably
I love that the prosecution thinks they're allowed to present Huber as peaceful in nature, and despite the precedent not being on their side, the judge says he'll allow it, and then the prosecution gives up on presenting the "peaceful Huber" lie when the defense pulls up Huber's actual history. It's just all lies with these guys.