Epic Detail Work On A Russian Su30 Rc Jet from SKYMASTER
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 07. 2024
- #rcjets #rcplanes #bambulabGlobal #bambulab #bambu #BambuX1C Epic Detail Work On A Russian Su30 Rc Jet from SKYMASTER Video 6 in the series.
Become a Channel Member here! / @thelightersideofrc
We cover lots of real time builds on our other channel The Lighter Side Of RC AFTER DARK: www.youtube.com/@TheLighterSi...
General: #TheLighterSideofRC #TheLighterSide #RCPlanes
- If you have any questions about items you have seen in my videos, build enquires, product placements, product reviews please contact me.
Connect with us
All Links Here: linktr.ee/thelightersideofrc
Purchase Bambu Products here: shareasale.com/r.cfm?b=228215...
Become a Channel Member: / @thelightersideofrc
Patreon: / thelightersideofrc
Website: www.thelightersideofrc.com/
Email: thelightersideofrc@gmail.com
Facebook: / the-lighter-side-of-rc...
Facebook: / jonathan.vogt.125
Instagram @thelightersideofrc. thelighters...
The Lighter Side Of RC AFTER DARK: www.youtube.com/@TheLighterSi...
Our Podcast channel: / @rcairexperience - Věda a technologie
The Su-27, Su-30 , Su-34 and Su-35, etc.--all such superb good-lookers and high-performance record holders. Always great to see RC versions, and constructed with your extensive experience, attention to detail and finesse!
Thank you!
An expert craftsmen! It's an honor to get to step inside your shop and watch you work sir! Cheers from the Appalachian part of the USA!!
Thank you very much!
Hi. Thank you for interesting videos. I really enjoy. I am a jet airplane pilot here in Norway. I have been in this hobby for 60 years now. Looking forward to your next. Best reg., John in Norway. Viking Jet Norway.
Thanks for watching them John!
Excellent video.. smart wiring and multiple CB210 setup.. nice touch on the 3D print label… Thanks a lot Jonathan 🙏🏻
My pleasure!
You are a RC building magician!!!!
LOL. Thank you!
wow😊
Thanks!
Not sure if you put the canopy air restriction “down stream “ of the cylinder. I’ve found that it will eliminate bouncing of the canopy by controlling the exhaust side rather than the pressure side of a cylinder in industrial applications
Ahhh, I have never considered doing it on the exhaust side! I will have to give that a try! Great suggestion!
Great job of setting up this complicated model. I like the thought you put into making maintenance easier.
Thanks!
Hello I love all your planes, great construction, is each of your planes sold with the electrical and pneumatic wiring plan?, thank you for the videos and explanations.👍 happy new year 2024
Thank you for watching and following along. The Wiring and Schematics are pretty simple when they are complete. All labled and clear to follow.
I love the goop! Great ideas man and overall a very busy build! -Ché
Thanks!
Jeez man that wiring and sorting out is a mind bender altho that data panel up front is great idea save a lot of mucking about 😮😅. All that wiring close together hopefully won,t suffer a Bull issue. Excellent work fella. 😊😊. Carry on.😊😅
Thanks! Yea the total footage of wire on this plane comes out to about 250ft of wire. Still not done but will end up in that range.
Amazing work… I learn something new on each of your videos. I will strive to wire my Rebel Max to the level of detail you do in your builds.
Thanks Karl!
Amazing, wow!❤
Thank you! 😊
USAF pilots on Russian SU30.. cool... 👍
Yes. Color matches great!
Question which way would you rather go for landing gear power source, air or electric, is there a advantage to one or the other
Electric is awesome but a well setup air system is great as well. Many scale aircraft still use air due to complexity of the system.
Pure genius craftsmanship
Thank you!
Nice video. There's so much electronics in this jet - that can really be considered as avionics.
Have you ever thought about buying a small CNC machine? I would have loved to see the cutouts on the sensor panel be perfectly lined up and level. Anyway still amazing craftsmanship by you 👍.
Can the canopy closing be done more slowly? This doesn't look scale enough for my taste. Or are there technical limitations?
Thank you very much. Yea I have thought about a CNC unit. Possibly in the near future. I could have used my laser but the problem is drawing it all out on the custom shaped piece.
With air it can't be slowed down much more. to get it slower a Linear actuator would be needed but then you run into the issue of damaging something if the lock is not undone.
Great job🙏🏿
Thanks 💯
E6000 is awesome stuff. I use that to repair my foam planes.
Nice!
I noticed that pilots' helmets aren't a russian but american model :)
I cant detect a significant difference, but they should have a red star on them. But the flight suits are the wrong colour they should be blue.
Pilots were chosen for matching. No care given to the nationality, color, etc. They were picked because they match!
Hi,
as always nice work and god, what a stunning plane.
But there is one thing I don’t understand. Why don’t you use the two way HF funktion? And in addition to that question and the additional 900MHz receiver, why did you not use the CB320 as planned in the beginning? It already has 3 ports especially for receivers. For example two Rex7s and one 900MHz. The method with a clone receiver is in my opinion an unnecessary complicated workaround for a good already existing and smart feature of the jeti system. Aside from that the problem with a clone receiver is that it is no longer visible for and in the radio. It is just a receiver „listening“ (no more communication from the receiver to the transmitter). When you have to program anything in the future regarding the clone receiver you always have to program it back to a non clone receiver.
Looking forward to hear your thoughts on this one.
Best regards from Germany 🇩🇪 and have a nice time building ✌🏼
Thanks. Don't understand the "Two Way HF Function"? It wasn't needed with our dual CB layout. The amount of ports would be excessive when a 210 is perfect. The owner of this aircraft uses a Clone setup in all his aircraft. Typically everything gets a rex 7/12 primary and the same clone. This is the first one we have built with a 900. The clone setup works well for the dense and busy airfield they fly at. Absolutley nothing wrong with Dual path and it works well. Some nice advantages to the clone setup.
@@thelightersideofrc
Hi,
I mean chapter 4.3.7 in the manual of the for example ds24 transmitter. Double path wireless mode. You have two full-fledged receivers instead of only one. The receiver programmed as clone is no longer able to send data packages to the transmitter like telemetry or so. It is a „dump“ receiver which can only „listen“. That’s why it also doesn’t show up in the transmitter like your „primary“ receiver, CBs and cortex. And I am not sure if you can even call this a redundant system as like the „Double path wireless mode“ is. That’s why I’m asking.
Best regards
@@kevinliskamm1316 absolutely redundant! The plane keeps flying! Just because you no longer get telemetry data doesn’t mean things are failing.
Absolutely nothing wrong with dual path. But. I often will get newbies buddy boxing on my aircraft to give them their first turbine flight. Can’t do it with dual path.
@@thelightersideofrc of course it functions. I was just thinking, why taking the harder way, when there is a simple one. The system uses only 50% of its capabilities. You can hook up 100 clone receivers but still have only one primary, and still using 50% of the system.
I mean if you insist in having the clone receiver you could program this additional clone receiver even with two primary receivers (primary 1 + 2).
But of course in the end, everyone has his own preference in setting up systems. I was just curious, if there is a special reason why you are programming it like you were. But if it’s because of buddy boxing, than it is understandable.
Best regards ✌🏼
I want to buy one there are few for sale, one I can get for $22,000 rtf and the other $25,000
What is your opinion for a used purchase price?
Great discount! Probably have to go through them to make sure they are up to your standards.
Great work on a neat build but your pitot tube install is all wrong. You need to attach both tubes not just the one. And it needs to be in free air flow so either on the nose or mid wing to wing tip.
The reasons are:
You have installed in the boundary layer too close to the fuse, the air will flow at a different speed to the jet there.
The second is that it is a turbine. (would be Ok for a prop plane) Turbines suck air through the intakes and cause a low pressure system in front of the turbine intake. This will include the entire front section of the model. A pitot tube processor calculates the air pressure at the reference hole in the tube (90deg to the air flow) to the air flow from forward motion at the tube measuring hole at the end of the tube. It calculates the airflow from the difference of the 2 different air pressures. In your setup the air pressure in the boundary layer will change with speed and direction. But not relative to the air flow directly in open air. So it will be an incorrect measurement. The location of your reference tube and the sensor itself is now dependant on the turbine throttle as the air pressure in the fuse will change (Get lower) as the pressure drops as the turbine sucks in more air.
So 2 incorrect measurements will not be at all accurate and make the install of the Pitot meaningless.
I use Pitots and other telemetry (3G Gyro and 3G Accelerometers. (IMU) ) logic to calculate air speed warnings for stalls on landing and high G turns. Having an accurate Pitot install is essential.
Thanks for the info. The install methods work well for a hidden scale application. It's a balance of hiding it and functionality.
Also any yaw to the right or unbalanced flight will result in undesirable or misleading readings. Yep it's just a model, maybe the speed accuracy isn't that important?? Why bother in this case, just utilize a GPS ground speed and make a judgement on wind speed correction. As for the boundary layer impact, yep certainly a factor, however she certainly won't be doing Mach 1 so the V squared impact will be far less but still a worthy consideration given the nice curves on this model. For me if I was installing to get good accurate readings, I think I would sacrifice the scale appearance and go for a more accurate location. A good test would be monitoring the GPS/ground speed and the IAS on a nil wind day for comparison. At the heights we fly at, the TAS effect will be minimal. Just my opinion. Otherwise, wow, what a machine, up until you unboxed the F14 XL, I can't look at anything else now..... :)
Man. Is that ever a lot of work for something that will be shut down by UA Air Force. 😊
Thanks! She's a beauty!
I don't mean to be rude but what happened to your hand ???
No cool stories. Born that way. 😀
@@thelightersideofrc mmmmmmm....ok....
Nice airplane but...hearing the word progress pronounced PRO GRSS is freaking annoying. It's normally pronounced ˈprä-grəs.
Sorry muffin for hurting your ear drums.
No problem Buckwheat...Just don't do it anymore 😁. @@thelightersideofrc
Who tf cares how someone pronounces something....he says decals his own way too...maybe it's just the way his area of Canada talks....it really makes no difference lol nice sn by the way
You don't show how to do anything, it's just a summary speech on what you've done. Not really useful to anyone in the hobby.
Funny. Not what most say.
@@thelightersideofrc What you mean is a few vocal sycophants have a different opinion but the silent majority would agree with me. For example you don't show how to fully fit an aileron servo and control horn.