That clip of Assim Al Hakeem is from long before you were sitting in a room with women. I believe it was from when Yaqeen Institube were behaving improperly. He didn't mention you so don't take it on yourself. Take his advice on board or leave it. Don't make videos about these complex matters. It only brings harm. Work it out behind the scenes or ignore it. Everyone knows so much yet can't come to understanding with their Muslim brothers. I said the same thing when the conflict between you and Sajid was just beginning to brew but you didn't listen and you know how that ended. None of youse could let it go. Don't make this videos. These differences can happen and its best not to flaunt these in public. It's not a matter of who is right and who is wrong. btw, I saw some of those "free mixing" videos, overall I didn't think they're particularly useful, no offense. I feel very confident in saying the best thing about all this is unlike Sajid, Assim Al Hakeem is not going to make a response video to this. A smart guy knows what to say but a wise man knows whether to say it. I'm putting it out there. I hope and pray I'm not wrong.
I always didnt like this youtube "sheikh" Asim, he doesnt care about anyone's feelings and also gives back and white fatwas nothing in between, this isnt right
There is something horribly wrong with you, I've watched one of that show men facing women, spreading their legs while wearing jeans and their private clearly showing because of the tiredness of the jeans in a sitting position. I am a woman and I don't wear hijab and I hate to be in a position where I face a man like that. So stop your arrogance and fear Allah Ali
*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_* *DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!* *ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!* *FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS* *_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_* *_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_* *_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
So I have an additional question, and correct me if I'm wrong. Didn't Ali say that some of the women don't put the hijab on habitually and that they had to put it on if they wanted to participate in the show? My question is, why are women who don't follow the basic teachings of Islam, giving Islamic marriage advice?
Actually, they don't even give their advice based on Islamic teaching (Some do but the majority don't) Most of their advice comes from their personal experience or opinion (You would hear a lot of "I think" from them). And sometimes their opinion can concord with Islamic teaching and sometimes it's not.
Bro. Ali, I've been following your other videos but i never liked the bitter truth. Stop 🛑 it bro. No benefit from this show other than small fitan building up.
Brother, "you dont like it" is not a fatwa he has to abide by. You dont like it, dont watch it. As for whether it has benefit for other people is again not for you to judge. Protect your own iman and preserve your family, thats best for you inshallah. If it causes doubts in your heart, then I suggest you dont watch it, its best for you. But to tell other people what to do based on your subjective opinion is not the islamic position. What is ijma' on the issue of free mixing is that unsupervised mingling between non-mahram men & women is haram. His show is a moderated discussion between men & women who are seperated. Since it doesnt fall under conscensus definition, its up to *people of knowledge* to form an opinion and believing men & women have to choose the most sincere opinion in their hearts. Now, Ali Dawah has shown his sources (which I thought people were right to criticize him for not sharing before btw), so now his sincerity is for Allah to judge, not any of us. May Allah bless you and protect our Ummah from fitnah inshallah.
@@bigbowss9817 it not a matter liking it or not liking its not a matter of fatwa or difference of opinion when something goes against Quran and hadith its clearly haram, Prophet said most stupid are those who are advised but they say care about yourself and your family, best of muslims are those who guide eachother towards good, stop defending this stupid show there is no point of doubt its clearly haram stop defending this stupid free mixing learn about Quran and Hadith properly Prophet a.s said my is the only way to success if you chose any other way it will lead you towards hell nothing else may Allah guide us all
His fatwa has 2 conditions. No tabarruj and no inappropriate topics. Both of these haven’t been followed on the show. Also tbh there is quite a lot of joking and laughing around on there. Hardly necessary. There’s been so much beneficial content on this channel, let’s not spoil it with this!
Tabarruj is present. At the very least it should be blurred like a lot of other muslim brothers that are giving dawah do e.g. muslimlantern, onemessagefoundation
Sorry Ali no matter how much you try to make something which is haram halal..it's always gonna be haram..i know your intentions are good but i have to stop you here brother!
Brother, you book smarts but not street smarts. When you take islam out of the books and apply Islam in the dunya, you will make mistakes. Why don't you lead a project with others and do it perfectly. no mistakes.
@EuphoricPlaz a mistake is when you do something wrong untentionally. This isn't that. He is make something which is clearly haram and calling it halal and going to crazy lengths to do so, intentionally too. When someone is commiting evil openly and justifying it, should we not call it out? What did Allah and His messanger taught us? To enjoin good and forbid evil, either with our hands, or tongue or at the very least to hate with our hearts.
@m0hamed_kamz70 What was haram brother it's your mind against the mind of 2 scholars of knowledge. Do you have the complete understanding to of everything halal and harram if not the quran says don't speak without knowledge. The show concept is halal but mistakes happened on the show. He admitted, apologized and is correcting the mistake.
@EuphoricPlaz it is not my mind vs. the mind of two scholars. My personal views are irrelevant! Rather, it is Quran and sunna vs the brother misusing the verdict of two knowledgeable Muslims (one of which is actually a deviant by the way and has been warned against) who probably haven't even seen the shaninigans brother is doing. I've also seen many knowledge brothers/channels advising/warning against what brother Ali is doing, too, on top of the fact that this is so clearly haram, even regular laymen who are subscribed to his channel are unconformable with watching his show. The signs and evidence are very clear if you're sincere and not just following your nuffs. The show concept is not halal because free mixing is generally already haram, bringing people to discuss deen on a public platform, who have no knowledge of the deen, and neither do they even apply basic obligations commanded by Allah (such as proper hijab, makeup etc), this is also haram. Chit chatting unnecessarily or about inappropriate things, such as husband and wife and bedroom affairs, and joking and laughing casually between non mahrams is also haram! Etc Honestly, there are so many things to point out about this fitna of a show. Just because you're shown "scholars" saying it's halal doesn't mean it's halal. Attach yourself to the Quran and sunna, not to individuals. If someone says something and it goes against Allah's revelation, even if they're a "scholar," reject it! Deen is based on evidence, not our desires or our favourite shaikhs. Why do you think sisters are commanded to pray behind brothers, with a screen or wall separating them? Just be sincere with yourself, brother.
@EuphoricPlaz Furthermore, brother ali has been getting warned about this show since the beginning. His apology and words don't mean anything if he is not making any changes. Stop justifying his clear wrong doing, and fear your creator. We're supposed to help each other upon righteousness, not evil deeds and sins.
@@abdmations us sisters can go on podcasts like haifa younis's podcast we don't need ali dawah, these women are only on this podcast because it's a card to get famous
@@m-fv8cg Regardless of the show and my opinion it. Just an advice for myself and others, try to stay away from assuming people's intentions "it's a card to get famous"
@@abdmations follow what aisha r.a did... its as simple as that. If your goal is to give da'wah to the ummah then do it exactly as aisha r.a did. She never free mixed with other men and subhanAllah her voice is much louder than any of the companions when it comes to sahih ahadiths. She narrated more ahadiths than umar r.a and abu bakr r.a COMBINED. I dont believe what ali dawah is doing is right but at least he admitted there are some gaps in the show that he is doing and we will wait and see what he has improved at least.
Go away and mind your business if you don’t like it … like seriously , what’s the point of complaining ? Nobody is forcing you to watch it lol get a life damn
he should send the videos. may allah forgive me for making such an assumption but he is most likely twisting the truth to make such educated scholars agree with him
Sheikh Asim was simply asked a question online, and he answered according to the few details given. He did not reference anyone in particular. As if he's sitting there watching Ali dawahs 'Bitter truth' show! If you look at Dr Zakir Naik then he's the biggest well known Da'ee anyone knows of and in all his Da'wah speeches he always had women at the back of the hall, never at the front.
EASIEST SOLUTION TO THIS ALI IS HAVE MEN ONLY PODCAST WITH A SHEIKH AND A WOMEN AUDIO ONLY PODCAST WITH FEMALE ALIMA EASY AND NOT A GREY AREA 100% HALAL
Woudnt it be better to seperate the men from the women. In one room. But draw a curtain in between. And ask the women to be covered fully or blur them.
I wonder, if the beloved Prophet Muhammad ﷺ were alive and walked in that room and saw how it was set up, would he be pleased with what was going on? In my heart, I just don’t believe so. I got love for you my brother @AliDawah but this all just feels wrong.
Ultimately we cannot base Islam on our feelings and what we unknowingly think the prophet SAW would have done. We base our actions on clear evidence from the quran and sunnah, not feelings
I just have one question. Is the goal of the bitter truth show been achieved or are there other better ways that can be done to tackle the divorce rates getting high. I feel like these are the footsteps of the shaitan ,maybe you are doing it for a good cause but others may copy you and try to justify what they are doing even if they are not doing it appropriately. I don’t know I just wish that there are better ways to discuss this matter
By that thinking any public works should be avoided due to such risks . Maybe I should not have a public charity because despite good intentions because it will lead me to do for attention or lead others to do it for attention.
@@jassimmudhaf234your comparing charity to woman all flashy looking, with hair and arms showing, nose rings and laughing with men about bedroom topics.
@@alia-wm8ug apologies I was not clear. Ii was addressing the following footsteps of the shaitan part and how he said you do it with a good cause but you could be doing it for the shaitan and how people might copy you and use for bad means
Akhy Ali, if the show is causing so much controversy and dividing people, isn't it better to just end the show or try to do it in a way that doesn't cause controversy? It feels like the show is trying to solve one problem but causing another at the same time. By the way, no hate, but if this controversy continues, it'll cause fitna. Unfortunately, even if it's starting with a good intention and I really respect the shuyukh, you still need to avoid it somehow or provide a better solution.
Wouldn't it be safer if the show adopted things like; 1. Avoiding inappropriate and sexual discussions(for obvious reasons) 2. Sticking to the topic and avoiding unnecessary chit chatting(curbs unnecessary joking and laughter) 3. Bluring the women(this fixes all issues related to improper hijab, makeup & tabarruj in General) It is quite a fragile situation and I'm sure Ali Dawah means well, but I think we should fear Allah more and hope that no part of the show is causing any sort of fitna to the potentially millions of watchers. As'salamu alaikum wa Rahmatulahi wa Barakatuhu
Honestly I agree with these points, especially the topic of the bedroom which should be a conversation for husband and wife only, unnecessary joking and laughter sadly might be a bit tougher to implent as they are human after all but in all this is the best comment I've seen, jazakillah khairan
whats wrong with sexual discussion? its part of people's lives. and u have to approach people in a humane way, not as a robot. so whats the problem with jokes and laughter? dont make everything hard and takes things to the extreme.
@@auhmav04 Asma’ bint Yazid reported: She was with the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, while men and women were sitting with him. The Prophet said, “Perhaps a man will say what he did in his house? Perhaps a woman will tell what she did with her husband?” The people sat in embarrassed silence, so I said, “By Allah, the women say so and the men do so.” The Prophet said, “Do not do so. Verily, that is like a male devil and female devil fornicating in the street while people watch.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 27036 Grade: Sahih li ghayrihi (authentic due to external evidence) according to Al-Albani Al-Adab Al-Mufrad 23 Abu Hurayra reported that the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "Do not laugh a lot. Much laughter kills the heart." Aisha reported: I never saw the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, laughing so hard that one could see the back of his throat. Rather, he would only smile. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 4551, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 899 Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi (authenticity agreed upon) according to Al-Bukhari and Muslim
Asma’ bint Yazid reported: She was with the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, while men and women were sitting with him. The Prophet said, “Perhaps a man will say what he did in his house? Perhaps a woman will tell what she did with her husband?” The people sat in embarrassed silence, so I said, “By Allah, the women say so and the men do so.” The Prophet said, “Do not do so. Verily, that is like a male devil and female devil fornicating in the street while people watch.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 27036 Grade: Sahih li ghayrihi (authentic due to external evidence) according to Al-Albani Al-Adab Al-Mufrad 23 Abu Hurayra reported that the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "Do not laugh a lot. Much laughter kills the heart." Aisha reported: I never saw the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, laughing so hard that one could see the back of his throat. Rather, he would only smile. Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 4551, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 899 Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi (authenticity agreed upon) according to Al-Bukhari and Muslim Fear Allah and be modest in your speech. Keep bedroom matters private for the messenger compared it to devil's fornicating in public. @@auhmav04
Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Didu is much more qualified than assimalhakeem it’s not even a comparison. It’s like comparing an elementary school student to a phD graduate
@@TaimurGhazanfar "Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Didu is much more qualified than Assimalhakeem it’s not even a comparison. It’s like comparing an elementary school student to a PhD graduate" Nah!!! You are violating Sheikh Assim here that's a crazy comparison. I agree that Sheikh Didu is more qualified than Sheikh Assim. But comparing Sheikh Assim al Hakeem to an elementary student is outrageous relax bro. Sheikh Assim al Hakeem is more knowledgeable than 80% of layman Muslims across the world (I could even say 90% but I won't). So, don't disrespect Sheikh Assim al Hakeem like that.
@@aboodylotus8087 In the first scholars opinion Alis show is not directly mentioned. The second opinion Ali does mention his show,but I wonder if the scholar he asked has actually seen the show?
@@TaimurGhazanfaral didu is not a man of knowledge. He is known for being soft and tolerant on many matters and is also known to be a jahmi with the attributes of allah swt. Basically he is corrupted both in the creed of islam and the bases of fiqh. So we don't take fatwas' from him nor do we recognize him (that's the overall opinion from saudi arabia)
His wife can’t speak and be shown online , mashallah great gheerah! but it’s okay for him to to have other women talk, laugh and sit in front of him and other brothers 👍
Ali dawah would u mind if ur wife attended one of this shows without u present? These women u have in ur show dont have their husband brother or father with them thats why its not allowed in islam
@@aboodylotus8087 some isn't enough even if their husband came u think its proper in our religion for me and ur wife to sit together close to each other while u present?? Did sahaba did that this isn't necessary Been watching Adam show since 2015 I'm old fan don't get me wrong I just don't support only that idea of mixing men and women for sake of episode
@@Yacine_21uk. We are in the same boat here bruv. I don't support this show whatsoever, and ofc I won't allow my wife to sit anywhere near you or any other men regardless of the occasion. I was just answering a question you asked and you could say (I hate using this phrase) I was playing "Devil's advocate"
you dont even follow the fatwah though you have women on there with makeup jewellery and hair out so delete those vids or post them with only audio or blur them
@@MuhammadFaisal-np7tc i'm no one to judge but haram is haram brother. see It's simple. Brother Ali is just doing fatwah shopping. Some islamic scholars even Legalize homosexuality they pray 5 times having multiple homosexual partners. May Allah guide us all
- If yall are wondering why most muslims (alhamudillah) made inkar (forbade) the practice Ali legislated to his followers in the podcast, Just look how clear the guidance of prophet Muhammad ﷺ is, regarding free-mixing!: - Abu Dawud (5272) narrated AbuUsayd al-Ansari: That he heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say when he was coming out of the mosque, and men and women were mingled in the road: Draw back, for you must not walk in the middle of the road; keep to the sides of the road. Then women were keeping so close to the wall that their garments were rubbing against it. (imagine at the end of the road the women entered a room and sat with the men to discuss the ummahs problem!) - Al-Bukhari (101): Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: Some women requested the Prophet (ﷺ) to fix a day for them as the men were taking all his time. On that he promised them one day for religious lessons and commandments. Why didn't he tell them to join the men, “for the sake of the ummahs problems” ?? Also, our mother Aisha forbade a women from kissing the black stone in tawaf because there was men! And commanded the women to make tawaf at night! [See Bukhari 1618] - Al-Bukhari (5232): Narrated 'Uqbah bin 'Amir (May Allah be pleased with him) said: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Beware of entering upon women." A man from the Ansar said, "Allah's messenger! What about Al-Hamu (the in-laws of the wife (the brothers of her husband or his nephews etc.)?" The Prophet (ﷺ) replied: The in-laws of the wife are death itself. - Al-Bukhari (5240) Narrated `Abdullah bin Mas`ud: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "A woman should not look at or touch another woman to describe her to her husband in such a way as if he was actually looking at her." ( because were not allowed to look at them aslan, let alone sit with them face to face, to solve the ummahs problems!) I can add more, but this is enough for the true submitter; Ali may Allah guide you and use you in good, make tawbah, shaykh al Dadu is not an excuse in the day of judgment, when you clearly went against the prophet ﷺ guidance, and this is exactly why you dont give precedence for al Dadus fatwa, against the three giants, (Ibn Baz, Ibn uthaymeen, Al-Albani) may Allah guide al Dadu and give him tawfeeq.
The 3 giants 😂. Brother those three are not the only scholars in the world, there are thousands outside of them and if all of them disagreed with the three giants what would you do?
No doubt Islam forbids unregulated mixing. However, we also have evidence from the Qur’an and sunnah that when there is purpose, respectful gender interaction within the boundaries of Islam and conditions are being met: 1. lowering gaze (not looking at awrah of the opposite sex or looking with any desire), observing modesty (in dress, speech and behaviour, no excessive makeup, some scholars allow kohl), no perfume, no khalwah (seclusion of men and women) and no physical contact or intermingling with the opposite gender in such a way that their bodies come into contact. Some of the evidence you provided is evidence of men and women in gathering in a crowded manner not being allowed but not evidence against the mere presence of men and women in one place. Also, the evidence you provided “Let there no man enter a woman,,” This hadith is referring to khalwa or seclusion being in a place where no one can see you and you are private with the opposite gender - Imam bukhari has compiled this hadith under Prohibition of men visiting married women alone. ‘Uqbah ibn ‘Amir reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Beware of entering the homes of women alone.” A man from the Ansar said, “What about sisters-in-law?” The Prophet said, “Entering upon them is deadly serious.” [Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 5232, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2172] What is prohibited is khalwa and not the mere presence of opposite genders in one place. Jabir ibn Abdullah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever has faith in Allah and the Last Day, let him not be secluded with an unrelated woman without her guardian lest Satan be the third of them.” Source: Musnad Aḥmad 14651, Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
Evidence from the Quran for regulated intermixing: Allah, the Most High, says in the Qur’an: [Qur’an 3:61] Scholars say this was revealed after the verse of hijab. It contains an invitation to the Christians of Najran to bring together on one plane those people mentioned, to invoke Allah’s curse upon those who were lying - This is one type of intermixing in an open public space. Evidence from the sunnah: On the authority of Abdullah ibn ‘Amr ibn al-As (ra) of Abdullah ibn amr ibn al-As (ra) Allah’s messengers said: “…. Let no man from now on visit a woman whose husband is absent, except when he has with him one or two (other) men.” [Sahih Muslim 2173] This hadith indicates that such a level of intermixing is permissible when there is NO seclusion (one man and one woman alone together) and they are safe from temptation. In al-Muwatta, it says that Imam Malik (ra) was asked: Is it permissible for a man and his wife to eat with another man? Imam Malik replied: There is nothing wrong with that if it is known custom of the people. [Source: Abu ‘Abdullah al-Asbahi Malik ibn Anas, al Muwatta - Cairo: Dar Ihya at-Turath al-Arabi). Sahl ibn Sa'd al Sa'idy, may Allah be pleased with him, said: "Abu Usayd invited the Prophet [pbuh] and his Companions to his wedding feast and his wife, Um Usayd, served them food and drink herself" [Related by al-Bukhari and Muslim]. Al Bukhari placed this hadith in a chapter which he entitled On [the permissibility] of a woman serving [food and drink to] men at her own wedding. Al Qurtubi stated in his exegesis of Qur'an: "Our scholars said: The report demonstrates the permissibility of the bride serving [food and drink to] her husband and his friends at her wedding." Ibn Hajar, the scholar of hadith, said in his book Fath al Bari: "The hadith demonstrates the permissibility of a woman serving [food and drink to] her husband and his guests. There is no doubt that this permissibility is valid only when the legal guidelines (lack of temptation and a woman covering what must be concealed) are met." The two foremost scholars in hadith, al-Bukhari and Muslim, mention a report about Abu Talha al-Ansari and his guest: Abu Talha and his wife invited a guest into their home. As they did not have enough food to go around, they pretended to eat, and spent the night hungry. In the scholar Ibn abu Dunya's version, Anas narrated that Abu Talha told his wife: 'Crumble the bread and put it in butter, and tell the servant to blow out the lamp.' Then they pretended to share the food with their guest." It is apparent from this report that they were all eating from the same dish. The Prophet [pbuh] told Abu Talha:"Allah is pleased with what you did tonight." The following verse was sent addressing this event: They love those who emigrated to them and find not any want in their breasts of what the emigrants were given but give [them] preference over themselves, even though they are in privation. [Qur'an 59: 9] Abu Juhaifa, may Allah be pleased with him, said: "The Prophet [pbuh] established a bond of brotherhood between Salman and abu al Dard'a. Salman visited Abu al Dard'a and found his wife, Um al Dard'a dishevelled. "What's wrong?" he asked her. She replied: "Your brother, Abu al Dard'a, has no worldly desires…" Commenting on this hadith, Ibn Hajar said: "This hadith includes some benefits … the permissibility of talking to non-mahram women and asking about that which concerns their life." As for business affairs which require for men and women to remain in the same place, there is no legal impediment for them to be together should the atmosphere is secured from temptation and private seclusion. The mere existence of both men and women in the same place is not prohibited in itself as what is prohibited is the seclusion of man and woman in a locked place where no one can enter. Imam ibn Daqiq al ‘Eid said in his book (Ihkam al Ahkam Sharh ‘Umdat al Ahkam) in his commentary on the prophetic tradition in which the Prophet said “don’t enter on women”, ibn Daqiq said that this statement is meant to address men other than the non-marriageable male relatives of the woman and the statement does not prohibit the general entrance of a room where there is a woman but rather prohibit entering a room on a woman when prohibited private seclusion with the woman is meant. Therefore if there is no prohibited private seclusion with a woman is meant, it is permissible for the man to enter a place where there is a woman. More importantly, not every seclusion is meant to be prohibited seclusion as Bukhari and Muslim reported through the authority of Anas ibn Malik that a woman from the Ansar came to the Prophet so he sat alone with her and addressed her saying “by God you- the women of Ansar- are dear to my heart” and al Bukhari included this hadith under the chapter titled “Chapter on the permissibility of seclusion between a man and a woman when they are among people”. Al Hafiz ibn Hajar in his book (Fath al Bari) said that conversing with non-mahram women secretly does not cause questioning of one’s religiosity should there be no temptation. This shows that the mere presence of the opposite genders in one place is not prohibited as long as the conditions are met.
@@faysalahmed9157 *Part 1* (its too long for one comment reply, it turned out to be a 6 page long document lool, may Allah accept it, wa Barak Allah feek) Thank you for your response Faysal, and ill be responding to every point by the will of Al-Hakeem, but i remind you of what al Shafi’i said once: “i never argued with someone except that i prayed Allah will make the truth run through his tongue”, its about following the guidance of muhammad, not our desires, social constructs, etc, which can form one's opinions and not the evidences; which i am not free of wallahu musta'an. *I say*: All of the evidence you mentioned is either taken out of context, before the ayah of hijab, or it was brief mixing for a purpose, so basically following the mutashabih and leaving the muhkam, not to mention that you didn't respond to many evidence i put forth in my 1st comment (because of how muhkam it is walhamdulilah). Then I say, obviously, every community is composed of men & women, an extent of mixing is a necessity, but always an exception but not the rule in muslim societies. And always a brief mixing for a purpose will occur (buying something, asking for something etc which no one said its haram), but there's a difference between “اختلاط عابر” (brief free mixing) and “اختلاط مكث” (prolonged free mixing), just like grapes, leaving it outside briefly is alright but leaving it for an extended duration will make it khamr and therefore haram, so the prolonging turned both the grapes and free-mixing haram (parable by Al-Tarefe). - *And heres my detailed response to your evidences wallah al musta’an*: - You said at the beginning (“we also have evidence from the Qur’an & sunnah that when there is purpose, respectful gender interaction”): - so Faysal you're telling me taking knowledge from the prophet ﷺ is not a purpose ?!, yet he ﷺ still separated them and gave the women a day to teach them without free mixing (btw you still didn't response to this daleel, which is Muhkam, but you're clearly going for the mutashabih) he ﷺ could’ve easily said its okay come the same day as the sahaba to learn but hey “fulfill the conditions” of lowering the gaze etc. which is contradictory! (؟! ثم ويحك هداك الله؛ كيف تستدرك على هدي رسول ﷺ والعياذ بالله) Even in his khutbahs he used to deliver them and then goes to the women after it and reminds them [see bukhari 977], he could've easily “fulfilled the conditions” you mentioned, but clearly these conditions aren't meant for those who intentionally seek the places of mixed gatherings, but rather for unintentional incidents and exceptions. - *And regarding your response to the hadith “Let there no man enter a woman” which was your longest response; whilst disregarding other Muhkam arabic eloquent instructions*: you interpreted to prohibit khalwah only, maybe you didn't read the hadith in arabic which clearly instructs the jama’ah or fard, plural or singular (“إياكم”) not to enter upon women while prolonging the stay. And regarding al-Bukhari (“compiling the hadith under Prohibition of men visiting married women alone”) Faysal, The prohibition of khawla is not the permissibility of mixing without khalwa, i repeat, The prohibition of khawla is not the permissibility of mixing without khalwa, you literally threw all the evidence and the ijma consensus of 14 centuries of scholars for this understanding of yours, Khalwas is prohibited, and prolonging mixing without khalwa is also prohibited. Furthermore, Bukhari is the same compiler of the other hadiths I mentioned prohibiting free-mixing. And this same hadith was mentioned in other chapters without different chapter headings . . - *As for Mentioning ayat al Muabahalah in the Quran is Ajeeb wallah, and here's the bayan*: Firstly, you're deducting a ruling on something that hasn't occured, and if it did occur, it would be out of necessity for truth & falsehood, for life and death (its a gathering for cursing! not chatting)? And even if it did occur, we don't know how it would be coordinated (begging the question). Furthermore, It is well-known who is meant by the verse, "sons" refers to Al-Hasan and Al-Husayn, "women" refers to Fatimah, and "ourselves" refers to the Prophet ss himself and Ali, as mentioned by Al-Baghawi, Al-Alusi, and others, as well as in the hadith in Muslim and Tirmidhi. So clearly, all of those mixing here are relatives. So how can you compare these circumstances with mixing for hours with non mahrams, having no male guardians. (i would mention quranic daleels for how obvious this matter is but i dont want to make it even longer) - *As for Imam Malik's fatwa (whom i translate a book for walhamdulillah)*: Nowhere in Maliks fatwa it says it's okay to continuously gather with any non mahram in any place, any time for any purpose (which is the case in most mixed gatherings today), a man is asking about eating food, which can be a necessity, and malik said “If its a custom”, so an exception, and some societies ahs this custom of eating together in some gatherings, without intermingling and mixing in an unacceptable way, even here in saudi some southern societies eat dinner in a long mattress where women are in one side and men in the other , without chatting and women are fully veiled. How can this be measured with today's ikhtilat audhubillah. Btw, He is the same imam that said: “I see that the imam should instruct workers (shop-owners) not to allow young women to sit with them (prolonging the stay). As for elderly women and lower-class servants who are not suspected of improper behavior, I see no problem with that.” (Albayan Waltahseel 9/335), and he's the same imam that narrated the hadith that prohibits free-mixing in his Muwatta. So stop following the mutashabih (ambiguous) sayings of the scholars. وافهم يا فهيم - *As for the hadith “Let no man from now on visit a woman whose husband is absent, except when he has with him one or two (other) men.”*: You're taking it out of context & not mentioning all of the hadith, like the way of those who say “woe to those who pray ...”; The full hadith: “'Abdullah b. 'Amr. b. al-'As reported that some persons from Banu Hisham entered the house of Asma' bint 'Umais when Abu Bakr also entered (and she was at that time his wife). He (Abu Bakr) saw it and disapproved of it and he made a mention of that to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) and said:I did not see but good only (in my wife). Thereupon Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said: Verily Allah has made her immune from all this. Then Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) stood on the pulpit and said: After this day no man should enter the house of another person in his absence, but only when he is accompanied by one person or two persons.”, This hadith merely indicates that some righteous companions of the Prophet ﷺ visited Asma bint Umays (one of the early most righteous believers) for a short period to check on the children of Ja'far ibn Abi Talib, ask about them, and look after their conditions (as Asma was was married to their father and the sons were orphaned.), nothing in the hadith indicates that she was sitting & chatting with Asma, nothing implies this. Also even if we suppose that Asma sat with them, there is no doubt that she was fully covered (veiled), and possibly behind a curtain like the way of the believing women those times [see Abdu Dawud 1833], and you cannot prove otherwise, and for certain is was not a continuous tradition of visiting other sahabiyat chit chatting with them for hours (like the ikhtilat of today) Furthermore, the misunderstanding comes from the lack of knowledge about the nature of the houses of arbs that time, and the ‘courtyards’ of their houses. Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Bari explained the meaning of "entering" as follows: "Entering does not necessarily mean lifting the veil; one could enter through the door and be addressed from behind the veil.", also the houses that time were rooms with open courtyards for guests, and entering the courtyard was also considered entering the house by extension, and this is unanimously agreed upon by scholars and historians.
*Part 2* - As for the hadith of Abu Usayds wedding (another mutashabih narration, whilst leaving the muhkam): This incident was before the ayah of hijab revealed and the regulations associated with it; which was in the 5th year of Hijrah, the wedding occurred before that. Abu Usayd's wife was Salamah bint Wahb, and their children included Usayd, the eldest, Mundhir, and Hamza, as mentioned by Khalifa ibn Khayyat in his Tabaqat (254, al-Omari edition), abu Usayd al-Sa'idi was 67 years old when hijab was imposed. His eldest son, Usayd, who was mentioned in this hadith, was listed by Abdan al-Marwazi among the companions, and similarly by Ibn al-Athir and others. The Prophet ﷺ passed away in the 11th year of Hijra, and hijab was imposed in the fifth year of Hijra, which means five years before his death. So, when did Usayd marry Salamah, when was their son born, and how could their son Usayd be considered a companion within those five years? That's why An-Nawawi said regarding this narration in his explanation of Sahih muslim: “This is understood to have occurred before the hijab was imposed” Similarly, Al-Ayni in Umdat al-Qari stated, "This was before the revelation of the hijab," as did Al-Qurtubi in his Tafsir. Several commentators have pointed out the early timing of Abu Usayd's marriage, such as Ibn Battal, who remarked, "This includes the drinking of non-intoxicating beverages at weddings, which was an old and well-known practice." So overall, these narrations and scholarly comments clarify that such interactions and the serving of food by women happened before the revelation of hijab and its associated regulations, and even for the sake of argument, serving the food is not prolonged, like the continuous free-mixing gatherings we see today. - As for the hadith of Abu Talha & his wife inviting the (almost dying) Ansari guest: Ibn Bashkuwāl Al-Andalusi said: “The Ansari man in question is Abdullah bin Rawahah, who was martyred at the Battle of Mu'tah in the 8th year of Hijrah. The timing of this incident is not established, making this argument weak, and this situation was apparently a case of extreme necessity. According to one of the narrations (as reported by Ismail al-Qadi), he had not eaten for three days! Saving a man's life takes precedence over not being in the presence of a non mahram woman in a pitch-dark place..” - As for the hadith of Salman speaking to Abu Al-Dardas wife: Well where does it say they prolonged the stay and kept chatting with each other like we see the freemixers practice today?! Remember the principle i mentioned, the continuous prolonging turns both the grape, and sitting with a non mahram impermissible (even with no khalwa), also no one said its haram to speak to a non-mahram for necessities, its permissible as ibn Hajar explained, but you unintentionally (inshallah) forgot some words of ibn hajar in the same explanation, he said “ .. the permissibility of talking to non-mahram women *for a necessity*”. - The Last hadith you mentioned which is the hadith of Anas where the prophet ﷺ secluded with a women from the Ansar: This hadith does not indicate the permissibility of free-mixing whatsoever, This women had a question for the prophet ﷺ, and she was shy to ask him in front of the people, so he secluded with her on the side road, not “sat alone with her” as you translated by mistake (inshallah), that's why al bukhari said “عند الناس among the people”, and It's good that you quoted ibn Hajar for this same hadith, because he said regarding it: “This means that he did not seclude himself with her in a way that they were out of sight of others, but rather in a way that they could not hear their conversation if it was spoken in a low voice, such as things a woman might be embarrassed to mention in front of people, The phrase "the Messenger of Allah ﷺ secluded with her" meaning on the side road, Anas did not imply that the Prophet ﷺ was alone with her out of sight of those who were with him. Rather, he was alone with her in a way that those present could not hear her complaints or the conversation between them. This is why Anas heard the latter part of their conversation and reported it, but did not report the conversation between them, as he did not hear it.” Al-Nawawi also said regarding it: “The meaning of 'seclusion' here is that she asked him a private question in the presence of others. It was not absolute seclusion, which is the type of seclusion that is prohibited.”. And we repeat: The mere presence with women is not prohibited for necessities, but prolonging the stay is. - In Conclusion: All the evidence you mentioned is either taken out of context or misunderstood, that's why you need a person of sunnah to explain knowledge or you'll will fall in these errors, and it was always said to us: “من كان شيخه كتابه، كان خطأه أكثر من صوابه” and Ibn Battah used to say: “"Among the blessings of Allah upon a young person and a non-Arab when they seek knowledge is that they are guided to a person of the Sunnah.” Lastly, my advice for you brother (if you know arabic; & i hope you do) is to read the book “Al-Ikhtilat” by AbdulAziz Al Tarifi where he addressed all the misconceptions on this matter, especially the first and last chapters of the book titled “Diversions from the Truth” / “Categories of People Regarding Knowledge and Action”, which does not deal with misconceptions directly, but with that which is far more important. Anyways i don't want to make this a pdf booklet lol, وحسبنا من القلادة ما أحاط بالعنق may Allah guide us both to what is correct Faysal, Allah surely knows best. هو حسبي ونعم الوكيل.
Ali just won’t understand. I seen the show. One handsome guy and one pretty girl on the show get eye contact and thats it. Fitna starts. Even though Ali might have a clean heart doesn’t mean the guests do.
How about put them behind a curtain, where you can’t see them, we don’t need to see the women but hear them Remember when the Companions of the prophet Muhammad peace be upon him used to ask his wives, they asked them behind curtains So don’t make excuses
@csmith3248 The same goes with something as basic as Salah. The sisters are away from the US, behind a wall or curtain. RasoolAllah ﷺ also said that the best row for women is at the back. The evidences are so many and so clear for anyone who is sincere.
If the shurood (conditions) of the fatwa - no tabarujj and no lewd topics - have admittedly been violated by your show, should the videos where this occurs not be taken down? And what about your other videos where poorly dressed women occur? Either in your thumbnail or directly in your videos? Should they not also be deleted? Sometimes people are not just out to get you, but you might genuinely be mistaken.. wa’llahu a3lam
Brother Ali. It’s not hard to change it so that the show is done online and not in person. If they are abiding by the rulings strictly, wearing Hijab properly, not wearing makeup ideally and the topics chosen are appropriate then you can still do this show. I agree that divorces are destroying the ummah but you can provide insight through the bitter truth show without them being there in person. You can be online, over zoom or something. You could even make it so that the women have a Mahram with them in the room. Please do make these changes like these Inshallah and Allah knows best.
lol yeah here in UK people also has fatwas from scholars of marrying with same sex i.e gay marriages and LGBT mosque in which gay and lesbians are praying 5 times along with having same sex partners 💀👀 . ALI needs DAWAH
Akhi do you really think sheikh assimalhakeem is on youtube and watching things . Btw he only answered it based on what was claimed by the questioner. I think the questioner made the addition of mentioning free mixing. Hence the sheikh answered it that way. I dont think the sheikh knows what the truth show really is or have seen it
@@BasedImaan maybe u didnt get me. I watch the sheikh assimalhakeeems videos and sometimes his lives. This video of him is taken from his lives in which people call in and he answers. Thats who i mean by “the questioner”
@@Bidhan_ahmedcould you link me where he directly mentions ali dawah with the picture of the show inshalla. The only one ive sen is where a person tags the sheikh and mentions that there is a muslim show where muslim men converse with non mahrams in PARTIAL HIJABS, MAKEUP and topics like BEDROOM RELATIONS. Hence the sheikh responded saying it’s completely prohibited which is also in line with the scholar ali dawah got his fatwa from. Ie it becomes prohibited with no proper hijab or improper conversations. So i think it might just be a misunderstanding between then wallahu a3lam. I will take back everything i say once proven otherwise inshalla
Look at how he focuses on the fact that ibn baz praised his sheikh so everything he says is free of mistakes, these is in contradiction with the statement I follow the Quran and Sunnah… I stepped long time ago from you Ali but now the clown show showed the reality of your place in the da’wah…
Wallahi I remember couple years back when I thought shamsi was being too harsh on mo hijab Ali dawah etc. but just looking at the decline of them both I understand shamsi fully.
@@unknownuser1862brother take my advice, not everything is painted in clear white and black, and shamsi is no better than them. Mo hijab and ali dawah and the others are too tolerant with some matters, and shamsi in the end of the day is a madkhali. Now ali made a mistake by cherry picking fatwas especially from an innovator such as al didu (that shows how much tolerance he has with those people), but that doesn't mean that you're going to jump ships to shami's. Basically, don't take sides
our Prophet spoke to women behind a veil and he never spoke unecessarily. when a blind sahabah came to the Prophet SAW's house, he asked his wives to go behind the veil as they could see him wven though he was blind. we should only listen to videos without looking at them directly and yes it is free mixing which happens On this show. the women even has makeup on and sitting right infront of them. you should make it an audio like that on radios
Assalamu alaikum Brother Ali just an idea to make this problem go away. Perhaps for future episodes of the bitter show is that you have a barrier or sutrah that way the men and women cant see each other but can still communicate. Just a suggestion might be hard to film but could provide some solutions. Just an idea i had i personally watched the show and did find benefits. May allah guide us and protect and Allah knows best.
Exactly! I think its best to just change the format of the bitter show overall from a face2face sit-in discussion to a online podcast/discord discussion that doesnt show the faces of the women (maybe instead just put different icons). This is out of consideration for their own well being and protection to hide their identity from the internet because of 'Ain and tabarruj
@@lentinnurman7144 This is probably the best solution to be honest. Very simple and easy and everything that is put through the bitter truth show can still be put out this way 100%. May Allah bless you akhi.
@JohnWick03 oh right im an ukhti btw haha, but yeah i understand that us girls who are aware of the implications of 'ain and tabarruj would tend to opt for not showing our faces online, instead we kinda just decorate our discord icons with flowers or something more random like a potato haha
Scholar is outrageous. Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Didu is much more qualified than assimalhakeem it’s not even a comparison. It’s like comparing an elementary school student to a phD graduate
@@TaimurGhazanfar And did Ali go with the fatwa he said in the fatwa Women cover up, and men should only speak with women that is permissible so tell me is discussing bedroom things and making jokes permissible between men and women? And can women wear makeup and go to shows like this? Would you send your mother, sister, wife or daughter this show?
@@WaleedHassan-bu1ff If the conditions of the fatwa are fulfilled there is no issue. The problem is that AssimAlkhakeem doesn't care if the ocnditions are fulfilled or not.
@@TaimurGhazanfar Stop assuming and begging the question, Till now the conditions have not been fulfilled, it feels like either you have hatred against assimalhakeem for calling a spade a spade based on what was going on (which is apparent because you have co conceded that this show doesn't meet the conditions of the fatwa and other thing to take into consideration that your innate fitra stopping you from sending your mother, sisters, wives, daughters to this show), Either you hate or dislike assimalhakeem or you have blind love and obedience for Ali for some reason and want to defend the fitna he's creating because of his arrogance.
@@dailydoseofexistence7159 if the conditions aren’t fulfilled on the show I condemn the show, but I believe he and his team are working on fulfilling those conditions
Is it is permissible to talk with women without lowering your gaze and women meeting men without makeup? Yeah no keep in mind every scholar has their errors and their point of view . Even tho it might not be a majority opinion. Also if you talk to women you have to lower your gaze . Youre not lowering your gaze .
Is photographing people not haraam? In the sense of creating images, specifically printing out the pictures of the people, or any creature, and framing it or other such similar things. Or does this, what you have said, mean only just taking a picture and leaving it on the phone or camera, and not making it tangible by printing it or framing it and so on?
According to the majority of classical scholars, the face and hands are not awrah a woman. Therefore, it is permissible to look at the face when there is a genuine need. What is prohibited is to look with lust/desires or when fears one will fall into desires. Just mere look in itself at non-awrah part of a person is not prohibited init self. Allah knows the best.
Ma sha Allah. Where is forbidding the evil and preventing brothers and sisters to look straight into each others eyes. Shouldn’t the Muslim men and women lower their gazes? Wallaahi the people of innovation will do whatever to justify their evil actions. I have to say: الحمد لله الذي عافاني مما ابتلاك به يا علي
Let’s say for argument sake it’s not free mixing… it’s still off for men and women sitting face to face for a lengthy period of time… if you still want to sit with women at least put a divider in between, stop making excuses
Guy claimed his wedding was segrated and his wife covers head to toe and not even speaking a word and filming from behind But other people's sisters and daughters it's fine to speak openly not cover fully and film them from head to toe in camera angles 😂
All that to prove that it is freemixing, and that you have no justification for it. Also, I don't pick and choose. I agree with sheikh Asim on the niqab being mandatory too. Alhamdulillah, every female in my house covers. Just get over your stubbornness, brother. It's really not that deep.
1:30 thx for breaking this down, so we can understand as you mention these words a lot (just started watching this vid, but throughout showcases of Ali Dawah, he'd mention this Ackle Nackle): Nackle (What Allaah command) Ackle (Mind)
From now on, you're just a random dude on youtube. So you follow a secret advice from a sheikh that was "praised" by sheikh ibn baz and not the opinion of sheikh ibn baz himself. What is this? You're just destroying your reputation bro. and you need to STOP IT
So if someone comes and gives you fatwah to steal. Would you steal? As long as they may make money they will steal and make excuses and said they sheikh gave fatwah about it .And if they fear Allah, they'll know that the Fatwah is wrong and won't steal.
brother ali if you did the podcast behind a screen you wouldn't be in this situation to begin with. How much do you spend to rent the studio? one could argue it's a waste of money.
Ali is completely stubborn. Many people warned him about free mixing, including Sheikh Uthman. The Muslim Lantern also recently discussed free mixing. It's crystal clear that what Ali did is completely haram, not to mention the topic they were discussing.
Ali talks as if most of the people have nothing to do but to criticize him. In reality people care for the religion and react according to the sunnah when they see it necessary! U didnt mention make up by the way! Just shut it down mate, enough with your arrogance! You would never let your sister or wife on the show if you are on your right mind so stop the hypocrisy
It is attributed to Umar bin al-Khattab (ra) that Islam will be destroyed by the lapses of the scholar, the hypocrite who argues using the Quran, and the rule of astray leaders.
Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Didu is much more qualified than assimalhakeem it’s not even a comparison. It’s like comparing an elementary school student to a phD graduate
This video proves what you are doing is wrong, also you pick and choose yourself while majority of sheikhs are against free mixing. You are dangerous to the ummah
He actually in my opinion, borderline slandered Sheikh Asim who has been very beneficial for the ummah in an age of great fitnah. Many things he mentioned like the opinion about marrying without a wali and how hanafi school of thought follow this well Sheikh has said its o.k because majority follow this rule in the hanafi school of thought. Sheikh never said all the hanafis are commiting zina. As for niqab then there's a difference of opinion whereas when it comes to free mixing there is no difference of opinion. Ali has punched way above his paygrade.
*Please read this if you really think this show isn't any good.* *This show changed my thinking for the best and I'll explain exactly why.* Even as a British born Kashmiri guy I wanted to avoid British Muslim women because i had misconceptions about them and wanted to marry someone from the village in Kashmir. Don't get me wrong, I knew marriages could go wrong from there too but my thinking was; higher divorce rates with UK women and even if the marriage does survive things are a lot tougher. Why was this my thinking before? because 1) the free mixing rules are super strict and therefore I rarely get to talk to them. This created lot of misunderstandings. 2) I heard stories all my life about marriages going wrong in UK and occasionally you'd hear the horror stories from Kashmir but it was few and far between. *However, after watching many episodes from this show I learned a tonne. I do apologise sisters I never knew your side of the stories as far as why divorces and marriage difficulties happen until I watched this show. I also thought your demands would be very difficult and in fact it turned out to be very opposite, so many simple minded individuals from the UK, again I thought it was a rarity before.* Just like myself there are 1000s of young men and women, finding it difficult to get married due to these misconceptions and other misunderstandings that I haven't mentioned. Especially Muslim men approaching their mid 30s like me because they're too afraid to get married from UK. I wish such resources were available 10 years ago so I didn't waste my life. *However* I also understand that Allah is the best of planners and everything happens at the right time. In the same token, Information regarding Islam and the sunnah in life such as marriage does not come to you by accident, a lot of useful information was provided by this show.
The question is that why do you have to interact with the opposite gender. You can become thhe producer of the show or the director and let a Muslim sister with proper hijab host the show when the guests are sisters
Either Ali dawah is slow in the head or he is being disingenuous trying to farm this for views, no where have Shiekh Assim mentioned ali's podcast by name neither does he even knows about the existing of your podcast so humble yourself lil bro you ain't that big, the Shiekh explicitly answered the questioner who was asking about the general ruling of podcasts that free mix if you know that you are not doing something wrong and that you got fitwa then why are doing this video? either you are not smart enough to know this is not about you or you are trying to farm views.
My beloved brother the ignorant will never understand you honestly . You are doing a great job may Allah swt bless you, do not fear my brother whom ever follows you are not it dose not matter. Only those who seek ilm and whom allah guides will truly understand you and the rest will never understand you even if you show them the evidences . May Allah swt blesss you
Sheikh assim should speak against Saudi kings where free mixing, dancing is now normal. I think alcohol is going to be legalised soon in the land of Tawheed. astaghfirullah.
That's such a bad example to compare. Brothers and sisters in a closed off studio that would sometimes talk about intimate stuff is not the same as being out in public where anyone can come up to you and talk about anything. It doesn't matter if you make the video public either
MashAllah pleased to see Ali D taking some positive steps to clarify points on his work which come into question. He was questioned on his charity work and he showed receipts. He is questioned on The Bitter Truth being free mixing and mashAllah he has gone out and provided evidence of scholarly opinions on the matter. My only advice is, as with ever QA with a sheikh, the answer is always specific to question and circumstance. BR Ali D, the question was broad.... so please be very careful on what topics are covered and weighing up if there is a pressing need to cover a specific topic. The fatwa made is to allow for mixing to cover something importance only. I would advise you to self evaluate and ask is there are need for so many episodes, to make it a series. Within the fatwa there is still the understanding women and men should not mix unless its for such n such a cause and such n such requirements are met there for you will need to weigh every episode under that scrutiny and not take it as blanket statement that all BT shows will always be permissable.
7:20 akhi there is no necessity. firstly there are many other series which can help failing marriages and for people who arent married. secondly, you can easily veil the women and put them behind a screen. we dont need to see them and you dont need to see them either. u can justify by saying that they dont have makeup, but their beauty is shown and a lot of people have dirty minds and thoughts.
May Allah Guide us all, Ali is making really great points and I do agree with him, I also have a massive respect for Sheikh Asim however I do not follow several things that Sheikh Asim said, as an example, regarding boycotting, but I do accept the difference of opinion and do not shame it. Differences of opinion is a Rahma/Mercy from Allah.
@@talimanwiz not at all, the example I gave regarding the boycotting, I follow a more strict ruling that I must boycott when there are different options available, what sheikh assim said regarding the boycotting was very lenient.
May Allah reward you brother Ali. I always assumed the best and hoped that what you do is authenticated. But when I heard the voice of Shiekh Muhammad Ad Didew you put me 100% at ease.
Listen I'm gone say this in short brother stop this show it won't help you in anyway. If you see an act that sparks fitnah and Muslims talking. My opinion is it's not worth. And stop defending your self it makes you look guilty lol.
shows with women and men in the same room talking topics isn't appropriate This is an innovation Women and men cannot talk or debate about topics to try to find a solution to nowadays problems. If Muslims wanted to solve problem they'd consult people of knowledge. The khutbah today subhanAllah was about that The shaykh said that people do not seek knowledge inside mosques anymore but on YT and make their own judgements
"if a person controls it and the men and women stay apart..." does he mean just sitting away from each other, or does he mean apart, as in a barrier to keep them apart. as a revert i went to a story time event i guess for the life of the prophet, and we sat apart from each in the room, but had a portable wall between us too
There is a problem that Muslims r facing divorces, loveless marriages, cheating & kids being separated from parents. The problem is how do men & woman interact in solving these problems in a Halal way?
Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Didu is much more qualified than assimalhakeem it’s not even a comparison. It’s like comparing an elementary school student to a phD graduate
How is it that you just go to one Scholar, wouldnt it be better to get the thoughts of many? Your just Fatwa shopping any scholar that says what you want you follow and when you dont want it you look for a different scholar.
He just got the scholar who gave him the desirable fatwa, brother no fatwa legalise this stupid, when this show is wrong from Quran and Hadith than it doesn't even whole world aulama give him the right to do it
In western countries mixing is necessary to preserve the uma in a not muslim country. Find your wife or man is difficult in a country with so much diversity of religions and lifestyle
@@faysalahmed9157 he is not a scholar have you seen his videos that guy is ikhawni and he said it’s ok to do reeba as long as your intention is not doing reeba
@@faysalahmed9157Sheikh in the sense of age? Diddddddu wanted to make one of the most dusgusting creatures on earth president of an committe of „islamic scholars“. Didu says things which are totally wrong, either he doesn’t know or he does not care
He was praised by Sheikh Abdul-Aziz Ibn Baaz رحمه الله when he was on the correct manhaj and Aqeedah, but the guy deviated when the Sheikh رحمه الله died.
I think the sheik mentioned that what happens in the show if it’s unnecessary laughs or matters prohibited to talk will make it forbidden. I think the shows does both. May Allah guide us all.
So your wife can only communicate under full niqab and speaks through a whiteboard, but you speak with other women with their voices and show their faces on a podcast?
Where is the proof from quran an sunnah ? we dont follow there apinions without proof. Allah says that if you differ then take it back to allah and hos rasol SAW, not to an imams thinking.
You mentioned a comment of the sheikh's Instagram page. Sheikh Assim said in an interview that he only owns and uses Twitter. The CZcams and the Instagram page at his name have been created and are managed by some sisters who asked his permission to spread his dawah
Looking at some comments it’s clear people are not here to follow Quran & sunnah and the fatwa of the scholars, they rather want to follow their mind. Alhamdulillah the matter of free mixing accusation is null and void.
Сейчас в тебе говорит эго, но ни как не щнающий мусульманин. Нет ни где в Коране и сунне о ом что, чужие друг другу женщины и мужчины могут находиться в одном месте. Остановись, подумай над тем что ты сейчас говоришь. Тебе должно быть стыдно.
says the one who went on a fatwa shopping expenditure lol that scholar you blurred is Al-diddu, he has Aqiday issues FYI my advice to you: don't swim in those waters because clearly you're not qualified. better stick to your activism and bouts of drama
Discussing deep personal topics with opposite gender it takes away from haya,laughing in the conversation when actually women are NOT supposed to talk even polite TONE to opposite gender.just dont do it.
Divorce rate are high due to feminism, Why does not one talk about how universities are impermissible for muslim women to attend?? As soon as our muslim women started going uni and building careers, divorce rates skyrocketed.
Makes absolutely no sense why you do those live chats with the sisters , ali why are you always in controversy, seems like there’s always issues with you , brother stop the drama , leave the drama for there mama ( shiek othman ) , stick to your dawah stop the drama
*WAQFOREVER | Donate to our Waqf for Palestine Now!*
donorbox.org/gaza-waqf/fundraiser/ali-dawah
*100% Donation Policy*
*Registered UK Charity*
Bro Ali, if the show isnt problematic, why dont you and Hijab bring your wives?
That clip of Assim Al Hakeem is from long before you were sitting in a room with women. I believe it was from when Yaqeen Institube were behaving improperly. He didn't mention you so don't take it on yourself. Take his advice on board or leave it. Don't make videos about these complex matters. It only brings harm. Work it out behind the scenes or ignore it. Everyone knows so much yet can't come to understanding with their Muslim brothers. I said the same thing when the conflict between you and Sajid was just beginning to brew but you didn't listen and you know how that ended. None of youse could let it go. Don't make this videos. These differences can happen and its best not to flaunt these in public. It's not a matter of who is right and who is wrong.
btw, I saw some of those "free mixing" videos, overall I didn't think they're particularly useful, no offense.
I feel very confident in saying the best thing about all this is unlike Sajid, Assim Al Hakeem is not going to make a response video to this.
A smart guy knows what to say but a wise man knows whether to say it. I'm putting it out there. I hope and pray I'm not wrong.
I always didnt like this youtube "sheikh" Asim, he doesnt care about anyone's feelings and also gives back and white fatwas nothing in between, this isnt right
There is something horribly wrong with you, I've watched one of that show men facing women, spreading their legs while wearing jeans and their private clearly showing because of the tiredness of the jeans in a sitting position. I am a woman and I don't wear hijab and I hate to be in a position where I face a man like that. So stop your arrogance and fear Allah Ali
*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_*
*DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!*
*ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!*
*FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS*
*_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_*
*_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
*_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
So I have an additional question, and correct me if I'm wrong.
Didn't Ali say that some of the women don't put the hijab on habitually and that they had to put it on if they wanted to participate in the show?
My question is, why are women who don't follow the basic teachings of Islam, giving Islamic marriage advice?
Wallahi dis is fitna overload
Actually, they don't even give their advice based on Islamic teaching (Some do but the majority don't) Most of their advice comes from their personal experience or opinion (You would hear a lot of "I think" from them). And sometimes their opinion can concord with Islamic teaching and sometimes it's not.
mashallah brother asked a very good question
point
most of them r divorced n have audacity to give advice of marital relationships.
Bro. Ali, I've been following your other videos but i never liked the bitter truth. Stop 🛑 it bro. No benefit from this show other than small fitan building up.
@@user-nv7mn4pi2vdon't judge his intention. that's between him and Allaah. so, stop!
@@user-nv7mn4pi2vagreed
@@user-nv7mn4pi2vhe is creating fitna nothing else I watched the show but realised too soon that this is wrong it goes against Quran and Hadith
Brother, "you dont like it" is not a fatwa he has to abide by. You dont like it, dont watch it. As for whether it has benefit for other people is again not for you to judge. Protect your own iman and preserve your family, thats best for you inshallah. If it causes doubts in your heart, then I suggest you dont watch it, its best for you. But to tell other people what to do based on your subjective opinion is not the islamic position.
What is ijma' on the issue of free mixing is that unsupervised mingling between non-mahram men & women is haram. His show is a moderated discussion between men & women who are seperated. Since it doesnt fall under conscensus definition, its up to *people of knowledge* to form an opinion and believing men & women have to choose the most sincere opinion in their hearts. Now, Ali Dawah has shown his sources (which I thought people were right to criticize him for not sharing before btw), so now his sincerity is for Allah to judge, not any of us. May Allah bless you and protect our Ummah from fitnah inshallah.
@@bigbowss9817 it not a matter liking it or not liking its not a matter of fatwa or difference of opinion when something goes against Quran and hadith its clearly haram, Prophet said most stupid are those who are advised but they say care about yourself and your family, best of muslims are those who guide eachother towards good, stop defending this stupid show there is no point of doubt its clearly haram stop defending this stupid free mixing learn about Quran and Hadith properly Prophet a.s said my is the only way to success if you chose any other way it will lead you towards hell nothing else may Allah guide us all
His fatwa has 2 conditions. No tabarruj and no inappropriate topics. Both of these haven’t been followed on the show. Also tbh there is quite a lot of joking and laughing around on there. Hardly necessary.
There’s been so much beneficial content on this channel, let’s not spoil it with this!
True
These aren’t inappropriate topics ?? Where are you getting this !! This is totally baseless !!
@@Khaled_Alghamdi they talked about their bedroom sexual activity, this good enough for u?
Tabarruj is present. At the very least it should be blurred like a lot of other muslim brothers that are giving dawah do e.g. muslimlantern, onemessagefoundation
He does get it smh. He went and found a halal fatwa 😿. This was predicted by our Nabi
Sorry Ali no matter how much you try to make something which is haram halal..it's always gonna be haram..i know your intentions are good but i have to stop you here brother!
Brother, you book smarts but not street smarts. When you take islam out of the books and apply Islam in the dunya, you will make mistakes. Why don't you lead a project with others and do it perfectly. no mistakes.
@EuphoricPlaz a mistake is when you do something wrong untentionally. This isn't that. He is make something which is clearly haram and calling it halal and going to crazy lengths to do so, intentionally too.
When someone is commiting evil openly and justifying it, should we not call it out? What did Allah and His messanger taught us? To enjoin good and forbid evil, either with our hands, or tongue or at the very least to hate with our hearts.
@m0hamed_kamz70 What was haram brother it's your mind against the mind of 2 scholars of knowledge. Do you have the complete understanding to of everything halal and harram if not the quran says don't speak without knowledge. The show concept is halal but mistakes happened on the show. He admitted, apologized and is correcting the mistake.
@EuphoricPlaz it is not my mind vs. the mind of two scholars. My personal views are irrelevant! Rather, it is Quran and sunna vs the brother misusing the verdict of two knowledgeable Muslims (one of which is actually a deviant by the way and has been warned against) who probably haven't even seen the shaninigans brother is doing. I've also seen many knowledge brothers/channels advising/warning against what brother Ali is doing, too, on top of the fact that this is so clearly haram, even regular laymen who are subscribed to his channel are unconformable with watching his show. The signs and evidence are very clear if you're sincere and not just following your nuffs.
The show concept is not halal because free mixing is generally already haram, bringing people to discuss deen on a public platform, who have no knowledge of the deen, and neither do they even apply basic obligations commanded by Allah (such as proper hijab, makeup etc), this is also haram. Chit chatting unnecessarily or about inappropriate things, such as husband and wife and bedroom affairs, and joking and laughing casually between non mahrams is also haram! Etc
Honestly, there are so many things to point out about this fitna of a show. Just because you're shown "scholars" saying it's halal doesn't mean it's halal. Attach yourself to the Quran and sunna, not to individuals. If someone says something and it goes against Allah's revelation, even if they're a "scholar," reject it! Deen is based on evidence, not our desires or our favourite shaikhs.
Why do you think sisters are commanded to pray behind brothers, with a screen or wall separating them? Just be sincere with yourself, brother.
@EuphoricPlaz Furthermore, brother ali has been getting warned about this show since the beginning. His apology and words don't mean anything if he is not making any changes.
Stop justifying his clear wrong doing, and fear your creator. We're supposed to help each other upon righteousness, not evil deeds and sins.
I totally disagree with Ali Dawad... it is free mixing... no doubt... LEAVE THE FOOLING SHOWN YOU ARE A GOOD BROTHER DO NOT LET SATAN FOOL...!!!
What's wrong with u? Didn't you not hear what he said? It is a valid opinion. If you disagree, fine. Don't say Satan is fooling him.
Bro who are u even ? U wanna battle scholars ya rabb stop Astaqfirullah
Let it be if u don’t like it
@@01MrCriminalyk ali isnt a Islamic scholar
@@FREEPALESTINENOW000 WHO Said he is ?? 🤦🏽♂️
Bro you don't need to do it, better safe than sorry.
yes he does if he wont give our sisters a voice who will our sisters need a voice on the internet
@@abdmations us sisters can go on podcasts like haifa younis's podcast we don't need ali dawah, these women are only on this podcast because it's a card to get famous
@@m-fv8cg Regardless of the show and my opinion it. Just an advice for myself and others, try to stay away from assuming people's intentions "it's a card to get famous"
@@abdmations follow what aisha r.a did... its as simple as that. If your goal is to give da'wah to the ummah then do it exactly as aisha r.a did. She never free mixed with other men and subhanAllah her voice is much louder than any of the companions when it comes to sahih ahadiths. She narrated more ahadiths than umar r.a and abu bakr r.a COMBINED. I dont believe what ali dawah is doing is right but at least he admitted there are some gaps in the show that he is doing and we will wait and see what he has improved at least.
I can't believe more people are NOT complaining against this show of free mixing!
Go away and mind your business if
You don’t like it … nobody wants to hear you complain
Go away and mind your business if you don’t like it … like seriously , what’s the point of complaining ? Nobody is forcing you to watch it lol get a life damn
@@questioneverything7011he advises
Have the shaykhs watched your channel to see how their fatwah has been progressively enacted?
he should send the videos. may allah forgive me for making such an assumption but he is most likely twisting the truth to make such educated scholars agree with him
Sheikh Asim was simply asked a question online, and he answered according to the few details given. He did not reference anyone in particular. As if he's sitting there watching Ali dawahs 'Bitter truth' show! If you look at Dr Zakir Naik then he's the biggest well known Da'ee anyone knows of and in all his Da'wah speeches he always had women at the back of the hall, never at the front.
EASIEST SOLUTION TO THIS ALI IS HAVE MEN ONLY PODCAST WITH A SHEIKH AND A WOMEN AUDIO ONLY PODCAST WITH FEMALE ALIMA EASY AND NOT A GREY AREA 100% HALAL
100%
Agreed, best to have the man and woman scholars come into the show to give their islamic advise
Woudnt it be better to seperate the men from the women. In one room. But draw a curtain in between. And ask the women to be covered fully or blur them.
you dont get views that way
We dont really need both women and men to argue. How did people from all cultures learn 1000 years ago?. Its not as difficult as people Make it Seem.!
I wonder, if the beloved Prophet Muhammad ﷺ were alive and walked in that room and saw how it was set up, would he be pleased with what was going on? In my heart, I just don’t believe so. I got love for you my brother @AliDawah but this all just feels wrong.
Ultimately we cannot base Islam on our feelings and what we unknowingly think the prophet SAW would have done. We base our actions on clear evidence from the quran and sunnah, not feelings
Fatwa must be in context to solve the problem ..
@@authenticmuslim1438 yes and based on the Quran and sunnah, this show is haram!👍🏾
@@standbyevidence1 what do you mean?
@@authenticmuslim1438 Brother if we base it on the Quran, sunnah and Hadith, its haram.
I just have one question. Is the goal of the bitter truth show been achieved or are there other better ways that can be done to tackle the divorce rates getting high. I feel like these are the footsteps of the shaitan ,maybe you are doing it for a good cause but others may copy you and try to justify what they are doing even if they are not doing it appropriately. I don’t know I just wish that there are better ways to discuss this matter
By that thinking any public works should be avoided due to such risks . Maybe I should not have a public charity because despite good intentions because it will lead me to do for attention or lead others to do it for attention.
@@jassimmudhaf234 ok
@@jassimmudhaf234your comparing charity to woman all flashy looking, with hair and arms showing, nose rings and laughing with men about bedroom topics.
Agreed there are better ways, and traditionally Scholars have been very cautious as to how they discussed such topics.
@@alia-wm8ug apologies I was not clear. Ii was addressing the following footsteps of the shaitan part and how he said you do it with a good cause but you could be doing it for the shaitan and how people might copy you and use for bad means
Akhy Ali, if the show is causing so much controversy and dividing people, isn't it better to just end the show or try to do it in a way that doesn't cause controversy? It feels like the show is trying to solve one problem but causing another at the same time. By the way, no hate, but if this controversy continues, it'll cause fitna. Unfortunately, even if it's starting with a good intention and I really respect the shuyukh, you still need to avoid it somehow or provide a better solution.
Not only that, but he only seems to speak to women and condemn them, but not the men. Just something I noticed.
Wouldn't it be safer if the show adopted things like;
1. Avoiding inappropriate and sexual discussions(for obvious reasons)
2. Sticking to the topic and avoiding unnecessary chit chatting(curbs unnecessary joking and laughter)
3. Bluring the women(this fixes all issues related to improper hijab, makeup & tabarruj in General)
It is quite a fragile situation and I'm sure Ali Dawah means well, but I think we should fear Allah more and hope that no part of the show is causing any sort of fitna to the potentially millions of watchers.
As'salamu alaikum wa Rahmatulahi wa Barakatuhu
Honestly I agree with these points, especially the topic of the bedroom which should be a conversation for husband and wife only, unnecessary joking and laughter sadly might be a bit tougher to implent as they are human after all but in all this is the best comment I've seen, jazakillah khairan
whats wrong with sexual discussion? its part of people's lives. and u have to approach people in a humane way, not as a robot. so whats the problem with jokes and laughter? dont make everything hard and takes things to the extreme.
@@auhmav04
Asma’ bint Yazid reported: She was with the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, while men and women were sitting with him. The Prophet said, “Perhaps a man will say what he did in his house? Perhaps a woman will tell what she did with her husband?” The people sat in embarrassed silence, so I said, “By Allah, the women say so and the men do so.” The Prophet said, “Do not do so. Verily, that is like a male devil and female devil fornicating in the street while people watch.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 27036
Grade: Sahih li ghayrihi (authentic due to external evidence) according to Al-Albani
Al-Adab Al-Mufrad 23
Abu Hurayra reported that the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "Do not laugh a lot. Much laughter kills the heart."
Aisha reported: I never saw the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, laughing so hard that one could see the back of his throat. Rather, he would only smile.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 4551, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 899
Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi (authenticity agreed upon) according to Al-Bukhari and Muslim
Asma’ bint Yazid reported: She was with the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, while men and women were sitting with him. The Prophet said, “Perhaps a man will say what he did in his house? Perhaps a woman will tell what she did with her husband?” The people sat in embarrassed silence, so I said, “By Allah, the women say so and the men do so.” The Prophet said, “Do not do so. Verily, that is like a male devil and female devil fornicating in the street while people watch.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 27036
Grade: Sahih li ghayrihi (authentic due to external evidence) according to Al-Albani
Al-Adab Al-Mufrad 23
Abu Hurayra reported that the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "Do not laugh a lot. Much laughter kills the heart."
Aisha reported: I never saw the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, laughing so hard that one could see the back of his throat. Rather, he would only smile.
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 4551, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 899
Grade: Muttafaqun Alayhi (authenticity agreed upon) according to Al-Bukhari and Muslim
Fear Allah and be modest in your speech. Keep bedroom matters private for the messenger compared it to devil's fornicating in public.
@@auhmav04
@@TheSpectreAW
❤️
Wa antum fa-Jazak'Allahu Khairan
Why do you insist on putting these women out there though? Why not take the safer side? I don't get it man
He doesn’t value Muslim women unless it’s his wife or mother
He is right accept his advice. Sheikh assim is a man of knowledge and well respected.
Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Didu is much more qualified than assimalhakeem it’s not even a comparison. It’s like comparing an elementary school student to a phD graduate
@@TaimurGhazanfar "Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Didu is much more qualified than Assimalhakeem it’s not even a comparison. It’s like comparing an elementary school student to a PhD graduate"
Nah!!! You are violating Sheikh Assim here that's a crazy comparison. I agree that Sheikh Didu is more qualified than Sheikh Assim. But comparing Sheikh Assim al Hakeem to an elementary student is outrageous relax bro. Sheikh Assim al Hakeem is more knowledgeable than 80% of layman Muslims across the world (I could even say 90% but I won't). So, don't disrespect Sheikh Assim al Hakeem like that.
@@aboodylotus8087 In the first scholars opinion Alis show is not directly mentioned. The second opinion Ali does mention his show,but I wonder if the scholar he asked has actually seen the show?
@@TaimurGhazanfaral didu is not a man of knowledge. He is known for being soft and tolerant on many matters and is also known to be a jahmi with the attributes of allah swt. Basically he is corrupted both in the creed of islam and the bases of fiqh. So we don't take fatwas' from him nor do we recognize him (that's the overall opinion from saudi arabia)
Sheikh Assim is some Saudi wahabi stooge keeping Bin Salman and his criminals in power and you support that?
His wife can’t speak and be shown online , mashallah great gheerah! but it’s okay for him to to have other women talk, laugh and sit in front of him and other brothers 👍
It's a shame that he is still defending this. May Allah guide us.
Allah will punish him if he does not repent and apologise to all Muslims. May Allah guide us.
Ali dawah would u mind if ur wife attended one of this shows without u present?
These women u have in ur show dont have their husband brother or father with them thats why its not allowed in islam
Some women do come with their husbands. But their husbands are in the background.
@@aboodylotus8087 some isn't enough even if their husband came u think its proper in our religion for me and ur wife to sit together close to each other while u present?? Did sahaba did that this isn't necessary
Been watching Adam show since 2015 I'm old fan don't get me wrong I just don't support only that idea of mixing men and women for sake of episode
@@Yacine_21uk. We are in the same boat here bruv. I don't support this show whatsoever, and ofc I won't allow my wife to sit anywhere near you or any other men regardless of the occasion. I was just answering a question you asked and you could say (I hate using this phrase) I was playing "Devil's advocate"
@@aboodylotus8087 thank you
Would you mind your sister being on a show with next man without a presence of a Mahram?
you dont even follow the fatwah though you have women on there with makeup jewellery and hair out so delete those vids or post them with only audio or blur them
Shut up if yoi dont like it dont watch it
@@MuhammadFaisal-np7tcwould you say the same if your mother was on there ?
@@Player_Zeesh Yes
@@thisisjamal1 dont judge me only Allah(SWT)can judge me
@@MuhammadFaisal-np7tc i'm no one to judge but haram is haram brother. see It's simple. Brother Ali is just doing fatwah shopping. Some islamic scholars even Legalize homosexuality they pray 5 times having multiple homosexual partners. May Allah guide us all
This man has been drip feeding fitna like a tv series
- If yall are wondering why most muslims (alhamudillah) made inkar (forbade) the practice Ali legislated to his followers in the podcast, Just look how clear the guidance of prophet Muhammad ﷺ is, regarding free-mixing!:
- Abu Dawud (5272) narrated AbuUsayd al-Ansari:
That he heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say when he was coming out of the mosque, and men and women were mingled in the road: Draw back, for you must not walk in the middle of the road; keep to the sides of the road. Then women were keeping so close to the wall that their garments were rubbing against it. (imagine at the end of the road the women entered a room and sat with the men to discuss the ummahs problem!)
- Al-Bukhari (101): Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri:
Some women requested the Prophet (ﷺ) to fix a day for them as the men were taking all his time. On that he promised them one day for religious lessons and commandments.
Why didn't he tell them to join the men, “for the sake of the ummahs problems” ??
Also, our mother Aisha forbade a women from kissing the black stone in tawaf because there was men! And commanded the women to make tawaf at night! [See Bukhari 1618]
- Al-Bukhari (5232): Narrated 'Uqbah bin 'Amir (May Allah be pleased with him) said:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Beware of entering upon women." A man from the Ansar said, "Allah's messenger! What about Al-Hamu (the in-laws of the wife (the brothers of her husband or his nephews etc.)?" The Prophet (ﷺ) replied: The in-laws of the wife are death itself.
- Al-Bukhari (5240) Narrated `Abdullah bin Mas`ud:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "A woman should not look at or touch another woman to describe her to her husband in such a way as if he was actually looking at her." ( because were not allowed to look at them aslan, let alone sit with them face to face, to solve the ummahs problems!)
I can add more, but this is enough for the true submitter;
Ali may Allah guide you and use you in good, make tawbah, shaykh al Dadu is not an excuse in the day of judgment, when you clearly went against the prophet ﷺ guidance, and this is exactly why you dont give precedence for al Dadus fatwa, against the three giants, (Ibn Baz, Ibn uthaymeen, Al-Albani) may Allah guide al Dadu and give him tawfeeq.
The 3 giants 😂. Brother those three are not the only scholars in the world, there are thousands outside of them and if all of them disagreed with the three giants what would you do?
No doubt Islam forbids unregulated mixing. However, we also have evidence from the Qur’an and sunnah that when there is purpose, respectful gender interaction within the boundaries of Islam and conditions are being met: 1. lowering gaze (not looking at awrah of the opposite sex or looking with any desire), observing modesty (in dress, speech and behaviour, no excessive makeup, some scholars allow kohl), no perfume, no khalwah (seclusion of men and women) and no physical contact or intermingling with the opposite gender in such a way that their bodies come into contact. Some of the evidence you provided is evidence of men and women in gathering in a crowded manner not being allowed but not evidence against the mere presence of men and women in one place. Also, the evidence you provided “Let there no man enter a woman,,” This hadith is referring to khalwa or seclusion being in a place where no one can see you and you are private with the opposite gender - Imam bukhari has compiled this hadith under Prohibition of men visiting married women alone.
‘Uqbah ibn ‘Amir reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Beware of entering the homes of women alone.” A man from the Ansar said, “What about sisters-in-law?” The Prophet said, “Entering upon them is deadly serious.” [Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 5232, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2172]
What is prohibited is khalwa and not the mere presence of opposite genders in one place.
Jabir ibn Abdullah reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever has faith in Allah and the Last Day, let him not be secluded with an unrelated woman without her guardian lest Satan be the third of them.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 14651, Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
Evidence from the Quran for regulated intermixing:
Allah, the Most High, says in the Qur’an:
[Qur’an 3:61]
Scholars say this was revealed after the verse of hijab. It contains an invitation to the Christians of Najran to bring together on one plane those people mentioned, to invoke Allah’s curse upon those who were lying - This is one type of intermixing in an open public space.
Evidence from the sunnah:
On the authority of Abdullah ibn ‘Amr ibn al-As (ra) of Abdullah ibn amr ibn al-As (ra) Allah’s messengers said: “…. Let no man from now on visit a woman whose husband is absent, except when he has with him one or two (other) men.” [Sahih Muslim 2173]
This hadith indicates that such a level of intermixing is permissible when there is NO seclusion (one man and one woman alone together) and they are safe from temptation.
In al-Muwatta, it says that Imam Malik (ra) was asked: Is it permissible for a man and his wife to eat with another man? Imam Malik replied: There is nothing wrong with that if it is known custom of the people. [Source: Abu ‘Abdullah al-Asbahi Malik ibn Anas, al Muwatta - Cairo: Dar Ihya at-Turath al-Arabi).
Sahl ibn Sa'd al Sa'idy, may Allah be pleased with him, said: "Abu Usayd invited the Prophet [pbuh] and his Companions to his wedding feast and his wife, Um Usayd, served them food and drink herself"
[Related by al-Bukhari and Muslim].
Al Bukhari placed this hadith in a chapter which he entitled On [the permissibility] of a woman serving [food and drink to] men at her own wedding.
Al Qurtubi stated in his exegesis of Qur'an: "Our scholars said: The report demonstrates the permissibility of the bride serving [food and drink to] her husband and his friends at her wedding."
Ibn Hajar, the scholar of hadith, said in his book Fath al Bari: "The hadith demonstrates the permissibility of a woman serving [food and drink to] her husband and his guests. There is no doubt that this permissibility is valid only when the legal guidelines (lack of temptation and a woman covering what must be concealed) are met."
The two foremost scholars in hadith, al-Bukhari and Muslim, mention a report about Abu Talha al-Ansari and his guest: Abu Talha and his wife invited a guest into their home. As they did not have enough food to go around, they pretended to eat, and spent the night hungry. In the scholar Ibn abu Dunya's version, Anas narrated that Abu Talha told his wife: 'Crumble the bread and put it in butter, and tell the servant to blow out the lamp.' Then they pretended to share the food with their guest." It is apparent from this report that they were all eating from the same dish. The Prophet [pbuh] told Abu Talha:"Allah is pleased with what you did tonight." The following verse was sent addressing this event: They love those who emigrated to them and find not any want in their breasts of what the emigrants were given but give [them] preference over themselves, even though they are in privation. [Qur'an 59: 9]
Abu Juhaifa, may Allah be pleased with him, said: "The Prophet [pbuh] established a bond of brotherhood between Salman and abu al Dard'a. Salman visited Abu al Dard'a and found his wife, Um al Dard'a dishevelled. "What's wrong?" he asked her. She replied: "Your brother, Abu al Dard'a, has no worldly desires…"
Commenting on this hadith, Ibn Hajar said: "This hadith includes some benefits … the permissibility of talking to non-mahram women and asking about that which concerns their life."
As for business affairs which require for men and women to remain in the same place, there is no legal impediment for them to be together should the atmosphere is secured from temptation and private seclusion. The mere existence of both men and women in the same place is not prohibited in itself as what is prohibited is the seclusion of man and woman in a locked place where no one can enter. Imam ibn Daqiq al ‘Eid said in his book (Ihkam al Ahkam Sharh ‘Umdat al Ahkam) in his commentary on the prophetic tradition in which the Prophet said “don’t enter on women”, ibn Daqiq said that this statement is meant to address men other than the non-marriageable male relatives of the woman and the statement does not prohibit the general entrance of a room where there is a woman but rather prohibit entering a room on a woman when prohibited private seclusion with the woman is meant. Therefore if there is no prohibited private seclusion with a woman is meant, it is permissible for the man to enter a place where there is a woman.
More importantly, not every seclusion is meant to be prohibited seclusion as Bukhari and Muslim reported through the authority of Anas ibn Malik that a woman from the Ansar came to the Prophet so he sat alone with her and addressed her saying “by God you- the women of Ansar- are dear to my heart” and al Bukhari included this hadith under the chapter titled “Chapter on the permissibility of seclusion between a man and a woman when they are among people”. Al Hafiz ibn Hajar in his book (Fath al Bari) said that conversing with non-mahram women secretly does not cause questioning of one’s religiosity should there be no temptation.
This shows that the mere presence of the opposite genders in one place is not prohibited as long as the conditions are met.
@@faysalahmed9157 *Part 1* (its too long for one comment reply, it turned out to be a 6 page long document lool, may Allah accept it, wa Barak Allah feek)
Thank you for your response Faysal, and ill be responding to every point by the will of Al-Hakeem, but i remind you of what al Shafi’i said once: “i never argued with someone except that i prayed Allah will make the truth run through his tongue”, its about following the guidance of muhammad, not our desires, social constructs, etc, which can form one's opinions and not the evidences; which i am not free of wallahu musta'an.
*I say*: All of the evidence you mentioned is either taken out of context, before the ayah of hijab, or it was brief mixing for a purpose, so basically following the mutashabih and leaving the muhkam, not to mention that you didn't respond to many evidence i put forth in my 1st comment (because of how muhkam it is walhamdulilah).
Then I say, obviously, every community is composed of men & women, an extent of mixing is a necessity, but always an exception but not the rule in muslim societies. And always a brief mixing for a purpose will occur (buying something, asking for something etc which no one said its haram), but there's a difference between “اختلاط عابر” (brief free mixing) and “اختلاط مكث” (prolonged free mixing), just like grapes, leaving it outside briefly is alright but leaving it for an extended duration will make it khamr and therefore haram, so the prolonging turned both the grapes and free-mixing haram (parable by Al-Tarefe).
- *And heres my detailed response to your evidences wallah al musta’an*:
- You said at the beginning (“we also have evidence from the Qur’an & sunnah that when there is purpose, respectful gender interaction”):
- so Faysal you're telling me taking knowledge from the prophet ﷺ is not a purpose ?!, yet he ﷺ still separated them and gave the women a day to teach them without free mixing (btw you still didn't response to this daleel, which is Muhkam, but you're clearly going for the mutashabih) he ﷺ could’ve easily said its okay come the same day as the sahaba to learn but hey “fulfill the conditions” of lowering the gaze etc. which is contradictory!
(؟! ثم ويحك هداك الله؛ كيف تستدرك على هدي رسول ﷺ والعياذ بالله)
Even in his khutbahs he used to deliver them and then goes to the women after it and reminds them [see bukhari 977], he could've easily “fulfilled the conditions” you mentioned, but clearly these conditions aren't meant for those who intentionally seek the places of mixed gatherings, but rather for unintentional incidents and exceptions.
- *And regarding your response to the hadith “Let there no man enter a woman” which was your longest response; whilst disregarding other Muhkam arabic eloquent instructions*:
you interpreted to prohibit khalwah only, maybe you didn't read the hadith in arabic which clearly instructs the jama’ah or fard, plural or singular (“إياكم”) not to enter upon women while prolonging the stay.
And regarding al-Bukhari (“compiling the hadith under Prohibition of men visiting married women alone”) Faysal, The prohibition of khawla is not the permissibility of mixing without khalwa, i repeat, The prohibition of khawla is not the permissibility of mixing without khalwa, you literally threw all the evidence and the ijma consensus of 14 centuries of scholars for this understanding of yours, Khalwas is prohibited, and prolonging mixing without khalwa is also prohibited.
Furthermore, Bukhari is the same compiler of the other hadiths I mentioned prohibiting free-mixing. And this same hadith was mentioned in other chapters without different chapter headings . .
- *As for Mentioning ayat al Muabahalah in the Quran is Ajeeb wallah, and here's the bayan*:
Firstly, you're deducting a ruling on something that hasn't occured, and if it did occur, it would be out of necessity for truth & falsehood, for life and death (its a gathering for cursing! not chatting)? And even if it did occur, we don't know how it would be coordinated (begging the question).
Furthermore, It is well-known who is meant by the verse, "sons" refers to Al-Hasan and Al-Husayn, "women" refers to Fatimah, and "ourselves" refers to the Prophet ss himself and Ali, as mentioned by Al-Baghawi, Al-Alusi, and others, as well as in the hadith in Muslim and Tirmidhi. So clearly, all of those mixing here are relatives.
So how can you compare these circumstances with mixing for hours with non mahrams, having no male guardians. (i would mention quranic daleels for how obvious this matter is but i dont want to make it even longer)
- *As for Imam Malik's fatwa (whom i translate a book for walhamdulillah)*:
Nowhere in Maliks fatwa it says it's okay to continuously gather with any non mahram in any place, any time for any purpose (which is the case in most mixed gatherings today),
a man is asking about eating food, which can be a necessity, and malik said “If its a custom”, so an exception, and some societies ahs this custom of eating together in some gatherings, without intermingling and mixing in an unacceptable way, even here in saudi some southern societies eat dinner in a long mattress where women are in one side and men in the other , without chatting and women are fully veiled.
How can this be measured with today's ikhtilat audhubillah.
Btw, He is the same imam that said: “I see that the imam should instruct workers (shop-owners) not to allow young women to sit with them (prolonging the stay). As for elderly women and lower-class servants who are not suspected of improper behavior, I see no problem with that.” (Albayan Waltahseel 9/335), and he's the same imam that narrated the hadith that prohibits free-mixing in his Muwatta. So stop following the mutashabih (ambiguous) sayings of the scholars.
وافهم يا فهيم
- *As for the hadith “Let no man from now on visit a woman whose husband is absent, except when he has with him one or two (other) men.”*:
You're taking it out of context & not mentioning all of the hadith, like the way of those who say “woe to those who pray ...”;
The full hadith: “'Abdullah b. 'Amr. b. al-'As reported that some persons from Banu Hisham entered the house of Asma' bint 'Umais when Abu Bakr also entered (and she was at that time his wife). He (Abu Bakr) saw it and disapproved of it and he made a mention of that to Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) and said:I did not see but good only (in my wife). Thereupon Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said: Verily Allah has made her immune from all this. Then Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) stood on the pulpit and said: After this day no man should enter the house of another person in his absence, but only when he is accompanied by one person or two persons.”,
This hadith merely indicates that some righteous companions of the Prophet ﷺ visited Asma bint Umays (one of the early most righteous believers) for a short period to check on the children of Ja'far ibn Abi Talib, ask about them, and look after their conditions (as Asma was was married to their father and the sons were orphaned.), nothing in the hadith indicates that she was sitting & chatting with Asma, nothing implies this. Also even if we suppose that Asma sat with them, there is no doubt that she was fully covered (veiled), and possibly behind a curtain like the way of the believing women those times [see Abdu Dawud 1833], and you cannot prove otherwise, and for certain is was not a continuous tradition of visiting other sahabiyat chit chatting with them for hours (like the ikhtilat of today)
Furthermore, the misunderstanding comes from the lack of knowledge about the nature of the houses of arbs that time, and the ‘courtyards’ of their houses.
Ibn Hajar in Fath al-Bari explained the meaning of "entering" as follows: "Entering does not necessarily mean lifting the veil; one could enter through the door and be addressed from behind the veil.", also the houses that time were rooms with open courtyards for guests, and entering the courtyard was also considered entering the house by extension, and this is unanimously agreed upon by scholars and historians.
*Part 2*
- As for the hadith of Abu Usayds wedding (another mutashabih narration, whilst leaving the muhkam):
This incident was before the ayah of hijab revealed and the regulations associated with it; which was in the 5th year of Hijrah, the wedding occurred before that.
Abu Usayd's wife was Salamah bint Wahb, and their children included Usayd, the eldest, Mundhir, and Hamza, as mentioned by Khalifa ibn Khayyat in his Tabaqat (254, al-Omari edition), abu Usayd al-Sa'idi was 67 years old when hijab was imposed. His eldest son, Usayd, who was mentioned in this hadith, was listed by Abdan al-Marwazi among the companions, and similarly by Ibn al-Athir and others. The Prophet ﷺ passed away in the 11th year of Hijra, and hijab was imposed in the fifth year of Hijra, which means five years before his death. So, when did Usayd marry Salamah, when was their son born, and how could their son Usayd be considered a companion within those five years?
That's why An-Nawawi said regarding this narration in his explanation of Sahih muslim: “This is understood to have occurred before the hijab was imposed” Similarly, Al-Ayni in Umdat al-Qari stated, "This was before the revelation of the hijab," as did Al-Qurtubi in his Tafsir. Several commentators have pointed out the early timing of Abu Usayd's marriage, such as Ibn Battal, who remarked, "This includes the drinking of non-intoxicating beverages at weddings, which was an old and well-known practice."
So overall, these narrations and scholarly comments clarify that such interactions and the serving of food by women happened before the revelation of hijab and its associated regulations, and even for the sake of argument, serving the food is not prolonged, like the continuous free-mixing gatherings we see today.
- As for the hadith of Abu Talha & his wife inviting the (almost dying) Ansari guest:
Ibn Bashkuwāl Al-Andalusi said: “The Ansari man in question is Abdullah bin Rawahah, who was martyred at the Battle of Mu'tah in the 8th year of Hijrah. The timing of this incident is not established, making this argument weak, and this situation was apparently a case of extreme necessity. According to one of the narrations (as reported by Ismail al-Qadi), he had not eaten for three days! Saving a man's life takes precedence over not being in the presence of a non mahram woman in a pitch-dark place..”
- As for the hadith of Salman speaking to Abu Al-Dardas wife:
Well where does it say they prolonged the stay and kept chatting with each other like we see the freemixers practice today?! Remember the principle i mentioned, the continuous prolonging turns both the grape, and sitting with a non mahram impermissible (even with no khalwa), also no one said its haram to speak to a non-mahram for necessities, its permissible as ibn Hajar explained, but you unintentionally (inshallah) forgot some words of ibn hajar in the same explanation, he said “ .. the permissibility of talking to non-mahram women *for a necessity*”.
- The Last hadith you mentioned which is the hadith of Anas where the prophet ﷺ secluded with a women from the Ansar:
This hadith does not indicate the permissibility of free-mixing whatsoever, This women had a question for the prophet ﷺ, and she was shy to ask him in front of the people, so he secluded with her on the side road, not “sat alone with her” as you translated by mistake (inshallah), that's why al bukhari said “عند الناس among the people”,
and It's good that you quoted ibn Hajar for this same hadith, because he said regarding it: “This means that he did not seclude himself with her in a way that they were out of sight of others, but rather in a way that they could not hear their conversation if it was spoken in a low voice, such as things a woman might be embarrassed to mention in front of people, The phrase "the Messenger of Allah ﷺ secluded with her" meaning on the side road, Anas did not imply that the Prophet ﷺ was alone with her out of sight of those who were with him. Rather, he was alone with her in a way that those present could not hear her complaints or the conversation between them. This is why Anas heard the latter part of their conversation and reported it, but did not report the conversation between them, as he did not hear it.”
Al-Nawawi also said regarding it: “The meaning of 'seclusion' here is that she asked him a private question in the presence of others. It was not absolute seclusion, which is the type of seclusion that is prohibited.”.
And we repeat: The mere presence with women is not prohibited for necessities, but prolonging the stay is.
- In Conclusion:
All the evidence you mentioned is either taken out of context or misunderstood, that's why you need a person of sunnah to explain knowledge or you'll will fall in these errors, and it was always said to us:
“من كان شيخه كتابه، كان خطأه أكثر من صوابه” and Ibn Battah used to say: “"Among the blessings of Allah upon a young person and a non-Arab when they seek knowledge is that they are guided to a person of the Sunnah.”
Lastly, my advice for you brother (if you know arabic; & i hope you do) is to read the book “Al-Ikhtilat” by AbdulAziz Al Tarifi where he addressed all the misconceptions on this matter, especially the first and last chapters of the book titled “Diversions from the Truth” / “Categories of People Regarding Knowledge and Action”, which does not deal with misconceptions directly, but with that which is far more important.
Anyways i don't want to make this a pdf booklet lol, وحسبنا من القلادة ما أحاط بالعنق
may Allah guide us both to what is correct Faysal, Allah surely knows best. هو حسبي ونعم الوكيل.
At this point it’s doing more bad than good. Perhaps it’s a sign of Allah.
I dont think its doing any good. I listen to them and hear them chit chatting.
Ali just won’t understand.
I seen the show. One handsome guy and one pretty girl on the show get eye contact and thats it. Fitna starts. Even though Ali might have a clean heart doesn’t mean the guests do.
Why is it so hard for you to blur the women out?
Why would he blur them whilst he himself is looking at them?
@@AbooHajjaajbut he blurs his own wife or doesnt even want to show her in the frame of the camera and even reveal her voice, subhanAllah
How about put them behind a curtain, where you can’t see them, we don’t need to see the women but hear them
Remember when the Companions of the prophet Muhammad peace be upon him used to ask his wives, they asked them behind curtains
So don’t make excuses
@csmith3248 The same goes with something as basic as Salah. The sisters are away from the US, behind a wall or curtain. RasoolAllah ﷺ also said that the best row for women is at the back. The evidences are so many and so clear for anyone who is sincere.
@@m0hamed_kamz70
Jazakullah khaire for that
If the shurood (conditions) of the fatwa - no tabarujj and no lewd topics - have admittedly been violated by your show, should the videos where this occurs not be taken down?
And what about your other videos where poorly dressed women occur? Either in your thumbnail or directly in your videos? Should they not also be deleted? Sometimes people are not just out to get you, but you might genuinely be mistaken.. wa’llahu a3lam
Exactly
Brother Ali. It’s not hard to change it so that the show is done online and not in person. If they are abiding by the rulings strictly, wearing Hijab properly, not wearing makeup ideally and the topics chosen are appropriate then you can still do this show.
I agree that divorces are destroying the ummah but you can provide insight through the bitter truth show without them being there in person. You can be online, over zoom or something. You could even make it so that the women have a Mahram with them in the room. Please do make these changes like these Inshallah and Allah knows best.
You can go Fatwa Shopping all you want.
lol yeah here in UK people also has fatwas from scholars of marrying with same sex i.e gay marriages and LGBT mosque in which gay and lesbians are praying 5 times along with having same sex partners 💀👀 . ALI needs DAWAH
R u serious 🤣
@@labib8705 you can see by yourself . It's all open now
All the bitter truth show does is create gender wars among the audience, no-one has said this has saved my marriage or made me a better husband/wife.
If it creates gender war that is our problem not his. We can't respect the content and the message and social messages they preach.
Akhi do you really think sheikh assimalhakeem is on youtube and watching things . Btw he only answered it based on what was claimed by the questioner. I think the questioner made the addition of mentioning free mixing. Hence the sheikh answered it that way. I dont think the sheikh knows what the truth show really is or have seen it
No he Directly mentions ali dawah with the picture of the show on Twitter.
What do you mean you think he asked that? Why are you even leaving a statement if you didn’t even watch it?
@@BasedImaan maybe u didnt get me. I watch the sheikh assimalhakeeems videos and sometimes his lives. This video of him is taken from his lives in which people call in and he answers. Thats who i mean by “the questioner”
@@Bidhan_ahmedcould you link me where he directly mentions ali dawah with the picture of the show inshalla.
The only one ive sen is where a person tags the sheikh and mentions that there is a muslim show where muslim men converse with non mahrams in PARTIAL HIJABS, MAKEUP and topics like BEDROOM RELATIONS.
Hence the sheikh responded saying it’s completely prohibited which is also in line with the scholar ali dawah got his fatwa from. Ie it becomes prohibited with no proper hijab or improper conversations.
So i think it might just be a misunderstanding between then wallahu a3lam. I will take back everything i say once proven otherwise inshalla
@@ShadoSage Instead you didn't get what I said. Did you watch the original clip where what the questioner said?
Ali needs dawah
😅
He's too arrogant to take it
Most definitely
Look at how he focuses on the fact that ibn baz praised his sheikh so everything he says is free of mistakes, these is in contradiction with the statement I follow the Quran and Sunnah… I stepped long time ago from you Ali but now the clown show showed the reality of your place in the da’wah…
Wallahi I remember couple years back when I thought shamsi was being too harsh on mo hijab Ali dawah etc. but just looking at the decline of them both I understand shamsi fully.
Palestine is being genocided
OBL was also praised, it doesn’t mean anything
@@unknownuser1862brother take my advice, not everything is painted in clear white and black, and shamsi is no better than them. Mo hijab and ali dawah and the others are too tolerant with some matters, and shamsi in the end of the day is a madkhali. Now ali made a mistake by cherry picking fatwas especially from an innovator such as al didu (that shows how much tolerance he has with those people), but that doesn't mean that you're going to jump ships to shami's. Basically, don't take sides
@@setokaiba1742 No ulama have ever used the term “madkhali” ever it’s a new concept which was made by kharijis who hate adhering to the sunnah
His fatwa has 2 requirements and they are not met, so how can you say it's completely halal
our Prophet spoke to women behind a veil and he never spoke unecessarily. when a blind sahabah came to the Prophet SAW's house, he asked his wives to go behind the veil as they could see him wven though he was blind. we should only listen to videos without looking at them directly and yes it is free mixing which happens On this show. the women even has makeup on and sitting right infront of them. you should make it an audio like that on radios
Assalamu alaikum Brother Ali just an idea to make this problem go away. Perhaps for future episodes of the bitter show is that you have a barrier or sutrah that way the men and women cant see each other but can still communicate. Just a suggestion might be hard to film but could provide some solutions. Just an idea i had i personally watched the show and did find benefits. May allah guide us and protect and Allah knows best.
Maybe even blur the women to protect from the viewers. There's simple things that could be done to safeguard the people.
@@muhammadazeem4684yes blurring and woman being segregated
Exactly! I think its best to just change the format of the bitter show overall from a face2face sit-in discussion to a online podcast/discord discussion that doesnt show the faces of the women (maybe instead just put different icons). This is out of consideration for their own well being and protection to hide their identity from the internet because of 'Ain and tabarruj
@@lentinnurman7144 This is probably the best solution to be honest. Very simple and easy and everything that is put through the bitter truth show can still be put out this way 100%.
May Allah bless you akhi.
@JohnWick03 oh right im an ukhti btw haha, but yeah i understand that us girls who are aware of the implications of 'ain and tabarruj would tend to opt for not showing our faces online, instead we kinda just decorate our discord icons with flowers or something more random like a potato haha
Brothers do not pick each others mistakes and imperfections. Don't divide the Ummah more than it already is. We are brothers to one another.❤
If we see any Muslims commit evil or a crime, are we not allowed to stop them and advise them?
We love upright scholars like sheikh Assim .. get off your high horse
Change for the pleasure of Allah
Scholar is outrageous. Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Didu is much more qualified than assimalhakeem it’s not even a comparison. It’s like comparing an elementary school student to a phD graduate
@@TaimurGhazanfar And did Ali go with the fatwa he said in the fatwa Women cover up, and men should only speak with women that is permissible so tell me is discussing bedroom things and making jokes permissible between men and women? And can women wear makeup and go to shows like this? Would you send your mother, sister, wife or daughter this show?
@@WaleedHassan-bu1ff If the conditions of the fatwa are fulfilled there is no issue. The problem is that AssimAlkhakeem doesn't care if the ocnditions are fulfilled or not.
@@TaimurGhazanfar Stop assuming and begging the question, Till now the conditions have not been fulfilled, it feels like either you have hatred against assimalhakeem for calling a spade a spade based on what was going on (which is apparent because you have co conceded that this show doesn't meet the conditions of the fatwa and other thing to take into consideration that your innate fitra stopping you from sending your mother, sisters, wives, daughters to this show), Either you hate or dislike assimalhakeem or you have blind love and obedience for Ali for some reason and want to defend the fitna he's creating because of his arrogance.
@@dailydoseofexistence7159 if the conditions aren’t fulfilled on the show I condemn the show, but I believe he and his team are working on fulfilling those conditions
Have you showed the actual show to the scholars?
Is it is permissible to talk with women without lowering your gaze and women meeting men without makeup? Yeah no keep in mind every scholar has their errors and their point of view . Even tho it might not be a majority opinion. Also if you talk to women you have to lower your gaze . Youre not lowering your gaze .
Is photographing people not haraam? In the sense of creating images, specifically printing out the pictures of the people, or any creature, and framing it or other such similar things. Or does this, what you have said, mean only just taking a picture and leaving it on the phone or camera, and not making it tangible by printing it or framing it and so on?
@@mujahid5735 I gave an example and I apologize because that wasn't a error by sheikh Fawzaan rather his side of view .
According to the majority of classical scholars, the face and hands are not awrah a woman. Therefore, it is permissible to look at the face when there is a genuine need. What is prohibited is to look with lust/desires or when fears one will fall into desires. Just mere look in itself at non-awrah part of a person is not prohibited init self. Allah knows the best.
The show is a platform to complain and give subjective opinions. Really no reason to have it other than to get views.
I'm wondering whether they have watched the entire show before commenting on its permissibility....
I very much doubt.
Ma sha Allah. Where is forbidding the evil and preventing brothers and sisters to look straight into each others eyes. Shouldn’t the Muslim men and women lower their gazes? Wallaahi the people of innovation will do whatever to justify their evil actions.
I have to say: الحمد لله الذي عافاني مما ابتلاك به يا علي
Let’s say for argument sake it’s not free mixing… it’s still off for men and women sitting face to face for a lengthy period of time… if you still want to sit with women at least put a divider in between, stop making excuses
Brother Ali is doing a good job for the Ummah. Mashallah.
The day of standing is real
Yawm al-Qiyamah is real
and Allah will Judge between His servants for what their hands have put forth
I really don’t know why we’re still listening to this guy just controversy which is not needed
Dedew lmaooooo ali really really needs dawah
Thank you so much for this!! Got to learn about 2 more topics that have diff of (scholarly) opinion. جزاكم اللهُ خيرا 💯💯👏🏻👏🏻
May Allah reward you for seeking a sheikh dedew advice. You’re a good man Ali. If dedew says something it’s enough what a trustworthy scholar he is.
Guy claimed his wedding was segrated and his wife covers head to toe and not even speaking a word and filming from behind
But other people's sisters and daughters it's fine to speak openly not cover fully and film them from head to toe in camera angles 😂
Make it make sense....
All that to prove that it is freemixing, and that you have no justification for it. Also, I don't pick and choose. I agree with sheikh Asim on the niqab being mandatory too. Alhamdulillah, every female in my house covers. Just get over your stubbornness, brother. It's really not that deep.
1:30 thx for breaking this down, so we can understand as you mention these words a lot (just started watching this vid, but throughout showcases of Ali Dawah, he'd mention this Ackle Nackle):
Nackle (What Allaah command)
Ackle (Mind)
From now on, you're just a random dude on youtube. So you follow a secret advice from a sheikh that was "praised" by sheikh ibn baz and not the opinion of sheikh ibn baz himself. What is this?
You're just destroying your reputation bro. and you need to STOP IT
If you value your islam - youd unfollow this person and his clique. They are entertainers. Its telling that their da'wah is under question.
So if someone comes and gives you fatwah to steal. Would you steal? As long as they may make money they will steal and make excuses and said they sheikh gave fatwah about it .And if they fear Allah, they'll know that the Fatwah is wrong and won't steal.
Ali didn't even fulfill the 2 requirements of fatwa
brother ali if you did the podcast behind a screen you wouldn't be in this situation to begin with. How much do you spend to rent the studio? one could argue it's a waste of money.
Ali is completely stubborn. Many people warned him about free mixing, including Sheikh Uthman. The Muslim Lantern also recently discussed free mixing. It's crystal clear that what Ali did is completely haram, not to mention the topic they were discussing.
Ali talks as if most of the people have nothing to do but to criticize him. In reality people care for the religion and react according to the sunnah when they see it necessary!
U didnt mention make up by the way!
Just shut it down mate, enough with your arrogance!
You would never let your sister or wife on the show if you are on your right mind so stop the hypocrisy
It is attributed to Umar bin al-Khattab (ra) that Islam will be destroyed by the lapses of the scholar, the hypocrite who argues using the Quran, and the rule of astray leaders.
Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Didu is much more qualified than assimalhakeem it’s not even a comparison. It’s like comparing an elementary school student to a phD graduate
He is an ikhwani sufi jahil @@TaimurGhazanfar
You can list as many credentials, qualifications, recommendations as you like... but scholars are not infallible or free from evil or shaytaan.
Madkhalis are following „their sheikhs“ more than ahadith from the prophet
Arrogance can be very deadly.
Thiss. I felt the arrogance. Geeez
This video proves what you are doing is wrong, also you pick and choose yourself while majority of sheikhs are against free mixing. You are dangerous to the ummah
He actually in my opinion, borderline slandered Sheikh Asim who has been very beneficial for the ummah in an age of great fitnah. Many things he mentioned like the opinion about marrying without a wali and how hanafi school of thought follow this well Sheikh has said its o.k because majority follow this rule in the hanafi school of thought. Sheikh never said all the hanafis are commiting zina. As for niqab then there's a difference of opinion whereas when it comes to free mixing there is no difference of opinion. Ali has punched way above his paygrade.
@@AJ-il1lm8ph7zmay Allah guide him. Assim al hakeem i listen to him , its easy for us who dont know arabic to get fatwa from him.
Ya Allah save the Ummah !! Everyone cannot be scholars ..
*Please read this if you really think this show isn't any good.*
*This show changed my thinking for the best and I'll explain exactly why.* Even as a British born Kashmiri guy I wanted to avoid British Muslim women because i had misconceptions about them and wanted to marry someone from the village in Kashmir. Don't get me wrong, I knew marriages could go wrong from there too but my thinking was; higher divorce rates with UK women and even if the marriage does survive things are a lot tougher. Why was this my thinking before? because 1) the free mixing rules are super strict and therefore I rarely get to talk to them. This created lot of misunderstandings. 2) I heard stories all my life about marriages going wrong in UK and occasionally you'd hear the horror stories from Kashmir but it was few and far between.
*However, after watching many episodes from this show I learned a tonne. I do apologise sisters I never knew your side of the stories as far as why divorces and marriage difficulties happen until I watched this show. I also thought your demands would be very difficult and in fact it turned out to be very opposite, so many simple minded individuals from the UK, again I thought it was a rarity before.*
Just like myself there are 1000s of young men and women, finding it difficult to get married due to these misconceptions and other misunderstandings that I haven't mentioned. Especially Muslim men approaching their mid 30s like me because they're too afraid to get married from UK. I wish such resources were available 10 years ago so I didn't waste my life. *However* I also understand that Allah is the best of planners and everything happens at the right time. In the same token, Information regarding Islam and the sunnah in life such as marriage does not come to you by accident, a lot of useful information was provided by this show.
@@Muwahid999 it's okay brother, i visit my homeland quite often.
Show is still haram and dumb and you got brainwashed to marry low quality women in Britain. So its even less beneficial
The question is that why do you have to interact with the opposite gender. You can become thhe producer of the show or the director and let a Muslim sister with proper hijab host the show when the guests are sisters
Either Ali dawah is slow in the head or he is being disingenuous trying to farm this for views, no where have Shiekh Assim mentioned ali's podcast by name neither does he even knows about the existing of your podcast so humble yourself lil bro you ain't that big, the Shiekh explicitly answered the questioner who was asking about the general ruling of podcasts that free mix if you know that you are not doing something wrong and that you got fitwa then why are doing this video? either you are not smart enough to know this is not about you or you are trying to farm views.
My beloved brother the ignorant will never understand you honestly . You are doing a great job may Allah swt bless you, do not fear my brother whom ever follows you are not it dose not matter. Only those who seek ilm and whom allah guides will truly understand you and the rest will never understand you even if you show them the evidences . May Allah swt blesss you
Sheikh assim should speak against Saudi kings where free mixing, dancing is now normal. I think alcohol is going to be legalised soon in the land of Tawheed. astaghfirullah.
That's such a bad example to compare. Brothers and sisters in a closed off studio that would sometimes talk about intimate stuff is not the same as being out in public where anyone can come up to you and talk about anything. It doesn't matter if you make the video public either
Why didn’t you let your wife sit on the podcast then?
His wife declined
Lol
MashAllah pleased to see Ali D taking some positive steps to clarify points on his work which come into question. He was questioned on his charity work and he showed receipts. He is questioned on The Bitter Truth being free mixing and mashAllah he has gone out and provided evidence of scholarly opinions on the matter.
My only advice is, as with ever QA with a sheikh, the answer is always specific to question and circumstance. BR Ali D, the question was broad.... so please be very careful on what topics are covered and weighing up if there is a pressing need to cover a specific topic. The fatwa made is to allow for mixing to cover something importance only. I would advise you to self evaluate and ask is there are need for so many episodes, to make it a series. Within the fatwa there is still the understanding women and men should not mix unless its for such n such a cause and such n such requirements are met there for you will need to weigh every episode under that scrutiny and not take it as blanket statement that all BT shows will always be permissable.
6:54 ok I understand dis ting, which connects/makes sense with what was shown in the beginning.
7:20 akhi there is no necessity. firstly there are many other series which can help failing marriages and for people who arent married. secondly, you can easily veil the women and put them behind a screen. we dont need to see them and you dont need to see them either. u can justify by saying that they dont have makeup, but their beauty is shown and a lot of people have dirty minds and thoughts.
One day someone told me that if god wanted to make definite not mixing he would create us separate in different planets 🪐
He says like he is the only once who care about marriage stupidity at its peak his show creating nothing but fitna
May Allah Guide us all, Ali is making really great points and I do agree with him, I also have a massive respect for Sheikh Asim however I do not follow several things that Sheikh Asim said, as an example, regarding boycotting, but I do accept the difference of opinion and do not shame it.
Differences of opinion is a Rahma/Mercy from Allah.
I noticed people that wants it easy doesnt like assim. I hope u r not one of those
@@talimanwiz not at all, the example I gave regarding the boycotting, I follow a more strict ruling that I must boycott when there are different options available, what sheikh assim said regarding the boycotting was very lenient.
May Allah reward you brother Ali. I always assumed the best and hoped that what you do is authenticated. But when I heard the voice of Shiekh Muhammad Ad Didew you put me 100% at ease.
The scholars in the Arab world, when they want to authenticate what they are saying cite Shiekh Al Didew
Yaa akhee…. WaLaahi show us any book of the history of ahlul sunnah wal jamaah that has the same case scenario you are trying to justify.
Listen I'm gone say this in short brother stop this show it won't help you in anyway. If you see an act that sparks fitnah and Muslims talking. My opinion is it's not worth. And stop defending your self it makes you look guilty lol.
shows with women and men in the same room talking topics isn't appropriate This is an innovation
Women and men cannot talk or debate about topics to try to find a solution to nowadays problems.
If Muslims wanted to solve problem they'd consult people of knowledge.
The khutbah today subhanAllah was about that
The shaykh said that people do not seek knowledge inside mosques anymore but on YT and make their own judgements
"if a person controls it and the men and women stay apart..." does he mean just sitting away from each other, or does he mean apart, as in a barrier to keep them apart. as a revert i went to a story time event i guess for the life of the prophet, and we sat apart from each in the room, but had a portable wall between us too
Some so-called "Scholars", give fatwas according to peoples desires.
Ali, this is the hardest cope I've ever witnessed in the history of coping.
Sheikh asim is right!
There is a problem that Muslims r facing divorces, loveless marriages, cheating & kids being separated from parents.
The problem is how do men & woman interact in solving these problems in a Halal way?
Sheikh Muhammad Al Hassan Al Didu is much more qualified than assimalhakeem it’s not even a comparison. It’s like comparing an elementary school student to a phD graduate
Brother its free mixing
How is it that you just go to one Scholar, wouldnt it be better to get the thoughts of many? Your just Fatwa shopping any scholar that says what you want you follow and when you dont want it you look for a different scholar.
Where is the problem with this if you are still playing in the safe zone 😅?
@@hafid0939it’s called following your desires
He just got the scholar who gave him the desirable fatwa, brother no fatwa legalise this stupid, when this show is wrong from Quran and Hadith than it doesn't even whole world aulama give him the right to do it
Can i send in a application to become a student of shiekh didiu?
In western countries mixing is necessary to preserve the uma in a not muslim country. Find your wife or man is difficult in a country with so much diversity of religions and lifestyle
Did Sheikh Asim really spoke about Ali Dawah ?
Not at all. He's acting childish
@somebody_55 ye sheikh directly spoke about ali dawah with the picture of the show on Twitter.
@@Bidhan_ahmedNo he didn't! Check again!
diddu gave you the fatwa i can see now😂 no shock to be honest ikhwani misguided
Who u calling misguided?
@@talimanwiz diddu
@underberg3007 Shaykh Dedo is a major scholar of our time, and we must respectfully disagree if we were to disagree.
@@faysalahmed9157 he is not a scholar have you seen his videos that guy is ikhawni and he said it’s ok to do reeba as long as your intention is not doing reeba
@@faysalahmed9157Sheikh in the sense of age? Diddddddu wanted to make one of the most dusgusting creatures on earth president of an committe of „islamic scholars“.
Didu says things which are totally wrong, either he doesn’t know or he does not care
He was praised by Sheikh Abdul-Aziz Ibn Baaz رحمه الله when he was on the correct manhaj and Aqeedah, but the guy deviated when the Sheikh رحمه الله died.
Khalas, Shaykh Dadaw has spoken, may Allah bless the show and make it a blessing for the ummah
I think the sheik mentioned that what happens in the show if it’s unnecessary laughs or matters prohibited to talk will make it forbidden.
I think the shows does both. May Allah guide us all.
Lol
So your wife can only communicate under full niqab and speaks through a whiteboard, but you speak with other women with their voices and show their faces on a podcast?
Where is the proof from quran an sunnah ? we dont follow there apinions without proof. Allah says that if you differ then take it back to allah and hos rasol SAW, not to an imams thinking.
yeah i aint native english, so can someone explain me what this is about?
You mentioned a comment of the sheikh's Instagram page. Sheikh Assim said in an interview that he only owns and uses Twitter. The CZcams and the Instagram page at his name have been created and are managed by some sisters who asked his permission to spread his dawah
Looking at some comments it’s clear people are not here to follow Quran & sunnah and the fatwa of the scholars, they rather want to follow their mind. Alhamdulillah the matter of free mixing accusation is null and void.
Сейчас в тебе говорит эго, но ни как не щнающий мусульманин. Нет ни где в Коране и сунне о ом что, чужие друг другу женщины и мужчины могут находиться в одном месте. Остановись, подумай над тем что ты сейчас говоришь. Тебе должно быть стыдно.
Saw one of the shows. All pretty dolled up girls.
says the one who went on a fatwa shopping expenditure lol
that scholar you blurred is Al-diddu, he has Aqiday issues FYI
my advice to you: don't swim in those waters because clearly you're not qualified. better stick to your activism and bouts of drama
😂😂😂 my guy is liking his own comments!
انت خبيث والناس بدات تشوف خباثتكم
Discussing deep personal topics with opposite gender it takes away from haya,laughing in the conversation when actually women are NOT supposed to talk even polite TONE to opposite gender.just dont do it.
Divorce rate are high due to feminism, Why does not one talk about how universities are impermissible for muslim women to attend?? As soon as our muslim women started going uni and building careers, divorce rates skyrocketed.
This is the same think thay I thought
remember guy we follow just the quraan and the sunna
Makes absolutely no sense why you do those live chats with the sisters , ali why are you always in controversy, seems like there’s always issues with you , brother stop the drama , leave the drama for there mama ( shiek othman ) , stick to your dawah stop the drama