The BIGGEST Update In WordPress For YEARS

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 09. 2024

Komentáře • 44

  • @tjsayers5428
    @tjsayers5428 Před 2 měsíci +2

    Looking forward to working with these patterns. Thanks for the sneak peek!

  • @annebovelett
    @annebovelett Před měsícem

    I'm super happy to see your enthusiasm! 🤗 I've had this stuff available to me in the block editor for 2 years with my favorite tool. It's super cool that this is finally coming to all core users.

  • @muyiwamatuluko8486
    @muyiwamatuluko8486 Před měsícem +1

    Nice to see Oxygen Builder's 'reusable parts' feature finally becoming native on WordPress. Implementation doesn't appear as seamless though.

  • @maxziebell4013
    @maxziebell4013 Před 2 měsíci +3

    I highly agree, love the topic! Powerful stuff… and it is only going to get better (we hope)!

    • @WPTuts
      @WPTuts  Před 2 měsíci +2

      I agree - for once, this is a feature in Core that I can get behind and feel adds a positive impact to working withing WordPress. :)

  • @michieltieleman9462
    @michieltieleman9462 Před 13 dny

    When I try to use nested synched patterns (simple group with a heading and a paragraph as a synched pattern, duplicated 3 times inside a column block which is part of another synched pattern for the whole section, to make a feature list of sorts) I lose the ability to edit the nested synched pattern.
    I also have issues with not being able to add extra paragraphs inside group/container style blocks, edit images(enable overrides) of the media&text block.
    Basically I'm trying to get the styling and layout fixed and locked in a (synched) pattern, and extra elements such as text a bit more easy to add and/or edit.
    How would you go about this?

  • @TruthTeller2024
    @TruthTeller2024 Před 2 měsíci +5

    I can't imagine handing anything built with Gutenberg off to clients. Apparently, a heck of a lot of lipstick can go on a pig though.

    • @bend84
      @bend84 Před 2 měsíci +2

      Doesn't mean this application within content sections isn't viable however.

    • @RandomStuffBroski
      @RandomStuffBroski Před měsícem

      What about built with cadence or blocksy? Why not?

    • @williamshevr
      @williamshevr Před měsícem

      Gutenberg isn't flowless but better than elementor, are you even a professional webdev? Cos accordign to your speech, you're not or haven't even really tried Gutenberg

    • @RandomStuffBroski
      @RandomStuffBroski Před měsícem

      @@williamshevr. no, Ive never used anything im brand new to web design and just trying to see what to get into , so many options

    • @TruthTeller2024
      @TruthTeller2024 Před měsícem

      ​ @williamshevr Gutenberg, with its 2.1 star rating in the repo, is better than Elementor? Ha, you're funny... and I don't even like Elementor.
      Have a look at Paul's latest video, then be ashamed and go away, troll.

  • @visualmodo
    @visualmodo Před měsícem

    Very good video guide!

  • @RobLicopoli
    @RobLicopoli Před 2 měsíci +1

    Sounds like SHTML, one of favorite old school ways to reuse content.

  • @padione3540
    @padione3540 Před 2 měsíci +4

    I saw bricks is also working on something like this

    • @WPTuts
      @WPTuts  Před 2 měsíci +2

      They are and I can't wait to try it out and see how it compares. :)

    • @bend84
      @bend84 Před 2 měsíci

      Is this anything like GutenBricks?

  • @ryanlee2091
    @ryanlee2091 Před 2 měsíci

    Finally usable! 🎉

  • @vaughanprint
    @vaughanprint Před 2 měsíci

    You hinted at the possibility of extra functionality. What do you foresee what that may be? Looking forward to this as components in Bricks.

    • @WPTuts
      @WPTuts  Před 2 měsíci +1

      I'd like to see more components supported and dynamic data too. It would be awesome if you could also utilise additional block plugins like GenerateBlocks, etc.

    • @RealBasicsDotCom
      @RealBasicsDotCom Před měsícem

      @@WPTuts Wait! In the 1.0 version you'll only be able to build components with core blocks? Not, say, Kadence, Generate, ACF, or hand-coded ones?

  • @RichardWadeUK
    @RichardWadeUK Před 2 měsíci +1

    It's nice to see this progress, however, but it's also quite "meh" in the scheme of things when compared to the power of Bricks and other builders. Gutenberg could be so much better and more powerful

  • @sjf29
    @sjf29 Před měsícem

    dashboard > appearance > editor > patterns > my patterns > choose pattern
    6 clicks just to navigate a pattern you can see. How about we make it 1 or 2 ?

    • @WPTuts
      @WPTuts  Před měsícem

      @@sjf29 I agree, it’s a terrible experience as is a lot of Gutenberg/core.

  • @premnathd
    @premnathd Před 2 měsíci

    Looks more like the reusable blocks feature in Oxygen?

    • @WPTuts
      @WPTuts  Před 2 měsíci +2

      No idea, I was never an Oxygen user. :)

    • @markokrstic7787
      @markokrstic7787 Před 2 měsíci

      Reusable blocks in oxygen does not have option to overwrite the content.

    • @premnathd
      @premnathd Před 2 měsíci

      @@markokrstic7787 Yes not exactly but we can make the reusable block editable (unsyncing interms of gutenberg)

  • @KishanParmar-n6c
    @KishanParmar-n6c Před 2 měsíci

    Which builder is best for design portfolio website

  • @quantum_leap
    @quantum_leap Před 2 měsíci

    Is that only for block themes?

    • @WPTuts
      @WPTuts  Před 2 měsíci +1

      No, you can use it with classic themes, but you're still pretty limited on what core blocks can be used right now, but I'm hopeful that this will expand once the final version is available.

  • @Zorro-Digital
    @Zorro-Digital Před 2 měsíci

    Wow, too much mucking around for me. You could never hand this off to a client really? imo

  • @SveinWisnaes
    @SveinWisnaes Před 2 měsíci

    Completely irrelevant to me... So it can not be that big ;-)