CA v Robert Durst Murder Trial Day 38 2015 Interview With Prosecutor John Lewin Part 2
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 08. 2021
- With the release of The Jinx Part 2 let's take a look back at the Robert Durst Trial. LIVE TRIAL: CA v. Robert Durst Murder Trial - Murder of Friend Susan Berman
Witnesses:
"BD Story"-Durst's Writing, Prep For Galv Trial
Robert Durst stands trial for the 2000 murder of friend Susan Berman. The trial began just before the pandemic in early 2020 and was halted two weeks in. The restart happened on May 17, 2021, with the same jury panel.
The defendant’s wife Kathleen McCormack Durst went missing in 1982. Evidence and testimony would show that Robert Durst killed her, the prosecutor said. The defendant allegedly told Berman it was an accident and asked her for help. She served as his alibi.
Berman, 55, was shot execution-style at her Beverly Hills home in 2000, and the prosecution suggested that it was because of what she knew about Kathleen’s death and disappearance. As defense lawyer Dick DeGuerin would have it, however, Durst is innocent. His client only came across the body, panicked, and fled, he maintained.
#RobertDurst #RobertDurstTrial
Law&Crime Network is Now on CZcamsTV! Find the Addon at
tv.czcams.com/users/welcometry/?u...
You may already have access to the Law&Crime Network! Find out here: lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
No access? That’s okay! Subscribe direct to Law&Crime here: lawandcrime.com/subscribe/
Watch Us Live On Peacock Daily Free: www.peacocktv.com/watch/home
Click on Channels & Scroll Down to Law & Crime Network
Durst is toast. Him taking the stand is the dumbest thing he will ever do. Lewin’s cross may seem all over the place, but he knows exactly what he’s doing. My money is on Lewin for the conviction .
🤞
I would not tell Durst about my dogs.
Been waiting for this today. But, I can't make out broadcast words of some people.
Lewin is brilliant
So if you want something, you can just take it from a store without paying because you're not going to stand in a line? So he was taught that's OK? Maybe his father did that? Asperger people I know, know that's wrong. He's entitled.
I knew a very wealthy dad owned an oil co
He
Got to be elderly and if the bill
Did not come fast enough in a restaurant hed get up leave lol
Booooooob, NEVER speak to the police!!!! His lawyers must be wanting to strangle him. 🙄
He forgot he’s NOT actually talking to a “fan” and he’s trying to impress the prosecutor. Ugh…
So confusing following this trial from the very start. Today the 4 videos are 2 on Law & Crime channel, the other 2 on Law & Crime Channel B. There has to be something I’m not understanding 🤷🏻♀️? Durst is too much that comment people on the street trust me & I trust them. He’s so full of himself.
I just wrote this feedback on one of the feeds (somewhere). The live feeds are confusing enough but it is ridiculous to not take care to label the videos (once no longer “live”) properly for continuity. (I had no idea there is a channel “A” or “B” but that probably explains why I keep finding what I think are “new” videos to find that I had already seen them)
Get better, longer mics for witness box!!!
This is a prior recording of when Durst spike to the police. This is not the prosecutor asking him these questions in the courtroom. (That hasn’t happened in the trial yet.) I think the detective has really done his homework & he’s a brilliant interrogator.
* spoke
It is prosecutor John Lewin interviewing Durst in Louisiana in 2015 with police present.
Defense yapping about not being able to afford a lawyer one would be appointed to him they are grasping at straws this is the same lawyer from texas.
My take away from this interview is that the DA is very difficult to listen to. At times, he seems to seek approval and validation from Durst himself, “I’m the reason they’ve opened the case in NY, not Jarecki” “Do you know why I didn’t call [sic]?” Then tells Bob in a ‘I’m so bright’ tone, “because they would have called you”. Just say what you need to say without asking a rhetorical question. So much of this recording is about the DA talking about himself. And as a psychiatrist, I’m not pleased to hear Lewin define autism spectrum disorders and conclude that bc someone can exhibit wit at times, that would preclude a diagnosis on the spectrum. Also, why would he ask Bob about what defines autism spectrum disorders/Aspergers’? As though patients who have this diagnosis are going to say, “yes, that’s me!’ Or that the patient having insight into that diagnosis is a criteria for diagnosis. How simplistic and untrue. That whole segment only adds to the stereotypes about people with autism spectrum disorder whom DA Lewin has zero credentials to diagnose or rule out a diagnosis of irrespective of bob durst.
Agreed. I detest Lewin's ego.
That’s a police defective asking him questions. Not a DA.
@@susanswift5890 I’m referring to the parts involving Lewin….I know who he is and I think anyone who has been watching knows when he is talking. I’ve listened to that whole interview. Its up somewhere on CZcams or online.
Lewin is brilliant, durst is guilty. Lewin didn't diagnose him, the experts defined it.
That's DA Lewin asking questions.
cant see who's talking
Its durst and lewellen the DA
Bob falls right into the trap of thr DDA
1:36:35
My son has aspergers and when Bob talks about what he supposed to do or say it is because people with Aspergers are constantly asking themselves what normal people would do because they cant read cues or social situations. It is clear he has it, not that it excuses what he did.
No he's just a narcissistic psycho
45:32 busted in a lie
Lewin is all over the place. He can hardly finish a complete thought before moving to a different thought or question. It’s very annoying because some of the questions he starts to ask are actually very important but he moves on and doesn’t come back to them. I don’t like saying this because I know Durst is guilty.
I really like Lewin but agree with that habit of forgetting the original path and it IS quite frustrating 🙈
He's doing it on purpose. Bob is no dummy. He wants Bob to think he doesn't know what he's doing and that he practically worships him. It's all a ploy. But I hope Bob gets off again, he's hilarious.
Lawyers move all over the place to catch the suspect in a lie.
@@jackattack_8 u sure?
@@speaklifegardenhomesteadpe8783
About what?
41:45 busted