Just a correction. AVX512 has been removed from 12th-gen Intel cpu's, so your best bet is the 11-gen series (Rocket Lake) instead. AMD Zen 4 also has its own implementation of AVX512.
i was so pissed when i got my i5 12400f and it was lacking avx 512 because that s why i bought it to use it for Rpcs3, otherwise i would had gone with amd
6 Cores, AVX512 and strong IPC is a must have for RPCS3... probably the news Ryzen 9000 CPUs move with much more ease the heavy games of the PS3. EDIT: Ryzen 7 CPUs also support AVX512 but in 2 cycles, but can still move GT5 at 60FPS, saludos!
that edit was perfect, AVX512 helps the cpus blaze through these games and delivers a buttery smooth framerate in those super hard to run and even unoptimized games
And in case you are wondering, no. The Steamdeck processor does not support AVX-512 either. AMD introduced it with Zen 4. Steamdeck's Ryzen 3 4300U is a Zen 3. It does however support AVX2, which is the 256 bit extension to AVX. Pretty much all compilers support it, but I don't know how much of that instruction set can be used by them to improve performance, when compiling code designed for the 512 bit extension.
Yo, I'm still rocking a 4790K btw, and the only reason I changed my old C2Q 9550 for this one, was just to play PCSX2. On that front it's amazing! And even to this day it has served me well, no complaints, BUT! My old C2Q felt pretty much the same as this i7 when doing some online browsing and youtube watching. It's on video games and source codes compilation where I notice a big difference. Right now, my goal is to be able to play RPCS3 4k@120, so I'll wait for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D (yeah, I need them cores for some hardcore linux kernel compilation). Btw, on my current CPU, RPCS3 ran quite good, not perfect but 1080p@30 was doable with most games, I even finished MGS4 at 2K@30, and it ran with a more stable performance than on original hardware. Gran Turismo 5 was more challenging, with a full grid this CPU struggle. But you are right, a CPU with AVX512 is a requirement for decent RPCS3 utilization. Just like SEE4.1 is a requirement for PCSX2. Can you use something else instead of those extension? Yes, ofc, but the performance won't be the best possible. Nice video mate! Cheers!
I was in similar shoes to yours, except I only had a 4670 until the end of last year. I went now with a 13600K to make sure I can emulate the PS3 well and do recording at the same time. I am not disappointed. Good luck with the 9950X3D when you get it!
As some one who doesnt know much and just found this emulator and downloaded it a week ago im just impressed that the ps3 is now retro and can be emulated my pc is a best buy pre build from 2019 and a 1660 super so a little dated but it still runs most games above 60 fps upscaled 200% res
Both Xenia and RPCS3 are too demanding. This is stupid. Xenia is 70% broken to this day, RPCS3 is still a mess and a PS4 emulator will be way faster. (shadPS4 is an example)
Well 4 cores 8 threads as way back as sandy bridge i.e i7 2600k can play a good amount of 3rd party (Playable) titles it's only first party titles or games that uses the PS3 architecture more effectively i.e Gran Turisimo 5,6 , Killzone 2,3 TLOU & stuff like GTA 5 & Infamous these really need as much cores & AVX 512 to get playable framerate. The PS3 architecture was hard to work with for game developers so some of them used easier ways to utilize the ps3 in turn they lost a lot of performance & or fidelity whilst others leaned into the architecture that brought us Impressive visuals and performance at the time. That is somewhat correlated to how easy or hard it is to emulate said games (Not Always though). That is probably the reason some games never came to newer gen consoles or PC as well , cause a lot of work needs to be done to port it over if devs leaned into PS3 SPU's.
still playing on my 4-core i7 laptop from 8 years ago, but you are right, some games really suck...for example gt5, gt6, gow3, ascension, motorstorm, etc, i get like 10-15 fps
0:20 the way some commenters will act under CCs' videos is so entitled it baffles me every time, even if I know it full well. I'm sorry you had to "discuss" with a dirtbag like that, left a Sub+Like. ;)
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 You cannot "optimize" away insufficient performance. *Everything* meaningful in PS3 emulation is CPU-bound. RPCS3 running on low-end computers is a pipe dream that will only come true when "low-end" is equivalent to current day high-end. The sad reality is Sony created a beast in the PS3, the CELL CPU. Not to mention on the real hardware the game is running directly on the console, whereas in emulation its in some program that creates an environment that the game expects to be in and mimics a real PS3 so that the games can run in this fake "PS3 container" (can't think of a better term). Doing all of this, instead of just running the game itself, adds a very significant amount of overhead that the real hardware doesn't have. I would like to mention that I'm not telling you this out of any dislike, rage or malice; I simply feel like it's incorrect to say that the emulator isn't optimized for low-end devices when that's just not really a thing that can be done, and wanted to share why if you aren't already knowledgeable. If you are then I wasted my time, and sorry for wasting yours lol
I've been using my go-to i7 13700f, and it's been holding up nicely with rpcs3! sure there is a little bit of stuttering, of course, but it's nothing to complain about
Do you have any experience with RPCS3 running on Macs? I have access to M2-based laptops with either 8gb or 16gb of ram. I have a few PS2 games I never experienced which I want to play through using PCSX2 (which works fine most of the time, unless I try to enhance the visuals too much) but then I wanted to move on to the PS3 era to play some of the games I played/could've played back in the day (I was an xbox360 owner as a kid). Do you reckon the M2 mac will suffice for RPCS3?
I5 10400 get the job done for me. Even plays the majority of games that are listed as "in game". Xenia performance is great on the few games that work but the UI sucks for normal users. Compared to where we came from Im pretty excited for both emulators and see them only getting better. Love this channel and would love to see a deep dive into Xemu, Dolphin and Cemu.
On an extremely tight budget I had a lot of luck with a Xeon 1660v4 (similar to 2667v4). 8C/16T similar to 1700X with TSX instructions to help it. Mobo, CPU w/ 16gb DDR4 is like 60 bucks total. I only played Killzone 3, Wipeout HD and Drakengard 3 and performance was great in all of them, unless I tried pushing over the stock FPS cap (though Drakengard was fine up to 90fps IIRC).
Anyone know why the folder in which RPCS3 comes in is growing in size? I've looked a bit into it and I keep reading something about PPU LLVM and SPU? Is there a way to compress this?
its the ppu modules and spu shader cache for your games thats useful for making your games smooth and stutter free. thats why RPCS3 has the "Compiling Shaders" message. and to answer your question, probably not.
@@iregreteverything-e4k Thanks. It turns out the cache isn't the thing that is drastically changing the size of RPCS3. It was the format of the games. I had a few games in the RAP format and they had to be installed into my PC before playing them. JB format seems to fix this annoyance.
you can do rpcs3 using a ryzen 3600 no problem. you just need to not exceed console specifications so whatever the game originally ran on so drakenguard 3 being 720p 30fps. avx512 is not necessary. it can give a solid improvement in efficiency of upto 30% in some games but mainly it's there for those looking to upscale or do 60fps mods. Around the time this video was released there were massive performance increases of practically double the frames due to overhauling the SPU code as well.
@@main_tak_becus6689 many reasons. this console is 18 years old. that means controllers are failing. the store does not work well, many limitations compared to pc, like data loading times, more ergonomic solutions to play, playing backups of your stuff if your ps3 failed (the phats are know to have memory issues now), save states...
Lmao, I was scared I’d make a cameo in that vid. Glad I didn’t ask any questions that sounded stupid. Also, sadly yes. This emu is hard to run. My steam deck can’t run it. Maybe legion go will do the job? I will find out soon enough.
it runs on my legion go but i've not really thrown anything too heavy at it yet. Was getting about 35-60fps on infamous with an average of about 45. Tekken 5, Tag HD run fantastic.
Man, I just wanted to play Uncharted, Infamous and other PS3 exclusives on the emulator, but here it's 20 fps or below. There is also the Xbox 360 emulator, Naruto exclusives are never playable with decent fps or without glitches.
The most disappointing thing is the custom cell CPU found in PS3. If they went with something more straightforward the emulation and development would be much easier.
@@ProtectusCZ Sony was originally going to use the SPUs for graphics processing iirc, they added the RSX when they heard Xbox 360 will have much more powerful graphics hardware.
Rpcs3 is cpu heavy but you can play on 2k or 4k upscale xenia is gpu heavy but you can't play on 2k or 4k it's need rtx 4090 to get 60fps!!!! The situation of emulators is very poor even after years of updates
We are stuck with a bunch of incapable devs working on these 2. Heck Xenia is even more of a mess, with every "build" there's always a huge downgrade in it, they're not even capable of doing simple resolution scaling (uhh graphics will break hurr durr). I guess since RPCS3 is so old, they started the coding on the wrong foot, and it needs atleast 10 years more to be good.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 My cpu is by day one. All motherboard are updated with new microcode :( It’s sad… at the beginning you had to turn off ecore to get avx512, but now is not possible anymore. Maybe you can revert back to older bios, but on my asus z690 tuf I cant revert back, is not permitted
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 yeah man you can let out to date your bios, it’s heavily not recommended, for some reasons often bios updates are needed, security, compatibility, you just can’t escape, especially if you need an early version of it to keep a feature live... Also, windows updates can will include microcode updates as part of the operating system updates (and it’s included in this case). So you just can’t escape. The only way is closing your system into a crystal ball taking outside of internet. It’s sad but it’s real. Not worth the effort.
I've only get less than 30 on uncharted 2 with R7 5700X with many stutters... Thankfully it runs Motorstorm pacific,demon souls, ICO and Shadow of The Colossus just fine.
my r5 5600x and my r7 5800h can run rpcs3 competently enough really, both run gran turismo 5 well enough. My r5 2600 is a whole another story, it struggles hard, since the zen and zen+ architectures struggle with AVX instructions, and zen2 and up don't have such issues anymore. No ideia how things run on the Intel side, I would imagine a i5 9600(k) and up would be fine too.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 Yeah I know they dont want to lose money because ps now services are making them alot of money like shark cards in gta online
It's five years old, so it might struggle with the high-tier exclusives, like Infamous, Killzone 2 and Uncharted. Otherwise it should be okay with 80 percent of the PS3 catalogue.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 inFamous has an absurd amount of draw calls, it even runs bad on the real hardware. This has nothing to do with the emulator and has everything to do with how the devs designed the game in the first place: with seemingly no performance considerations.
Rpcs3 is amazing and is one of the best emulators out there. Almost everythign I have plays it amazingly. I dont understand why you'd cry it doesnt work great with a 10 year old pc.
No, I have a newer pc. It was just a means of comparison... Anyway, RPCS3 is not a person. It's a piece of software, so I don't think there's any danger of making it feel outraged.
technicality's aside its the simple fact the ps3 arcytecthure with its notisously hard coding . in a field were emualtion even if much stronger hardware can take years to develope . just look at were psx and dolphin are at and theyr not 100 percent their yet (but very close in my op) and are super solid on high end laptops with gtx1050 / 1060 equiviletns at 4k right now hom many years since they started deving on modern 2020 hardware .And these guys have no source code , sony employs devs or even time/ budget . they doing as side hustle. So give it at least 20 years before i even so much recomend rpsx3 to peopl to emulate semi reliabily for most when 8 core cpus become norm. because even with my core high i7 cpu pcs ddr3 and ddr4 gen ones i can bealry run ps2 games reralses on ps3 on rpcs3.
I got a ryzen 7, with a 12gb 3060 and its struggled to play the last of us. Most of the game was between 15-25fps, with artifacts, crashes, and stuttering.
That's what many people experience, but I got a lot of flack from fanboys for mentioning this. I mean, I made a RPCS3 compilation video and have no ill will towards the developers, but they already kicked me from their Discord server. That's how open-minded they are.
@@ivansucic9149 Running it on an i5-12400F without AVX512, and my experience was quite okay. I can't say it'd be the same for you, or if the experience is seamless, but the first hour of gameplay was way better than on the actual console for me
i thought it was the games being buggy on the wiki page, always wondered why my wiiu and switch emulators work playable to ok but 360 and ps3 was such a struggle, i tried some vita titles and 3ds run fine for me
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 i was really enjoying Dead to Rights on Xenia, plays perfectly then i think half way through the game i hit a level that kept crashing, so decided to fire up RPCS3 give it a go, oh it was bad! bad frame rates, backgroud was a jumble mess etc hahaha
Great video. I've been saying this for years. RPCS3 is just bad. It has everything implemented in it badly. No hardware could emulate anything properly. It's a bad emulator design overall. It sucks.
Just a correction. AVX512 has been removed from 12th-gen Intel cpu's, so your best bet is the 11-gen series (Rocket Lake) instead. AMD Zen 4 also has its own implementation of AVX512.
i was so pissed when i got my i5 12400f and it was lacking avx 512 because that s why i bought it to use it for Rpcs3, otherwise i would had gone with amd
@@hollowinside1962 You just gotta love Intel. They move two steps forward and then pull the rug out from under you.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 yeah i m never touching intel
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 because AVX 512 is garbage. AVX 256 will perform better cause it can clock higher.
@@hollowinside1962 That cpu actually runs rpcs3 really well.
6 Cores, AVX512 and strong IPC is a must have for RPCS3... probably the news Ryzen 9000 CPUs move with much more ease the heavy games of the PS3.
EDIT: Ryzen 7 CPUs also support AVX512 but in 2 cycles, but can still move GT5 at 60FPS, saludos!
that edit was perfect, AVX512 helps the cpus blaze through these games and delivers a buttery smooth framerate in those super hard to run and even unoptimized games
My 13700f is a Titan for rcps3
Reckon my 5ghz i7 7800x would be enough? It has avx512 and tuned ram
@@SlowHardware you should be solid.
@@LuccianoNova sweet
And in case you are wondering, no. The Steamdeck processor does not support AVX-512 either. AMD introduced it with Zen 4. Steamdeck's Ryzen 3 4300U is a Zen 3. It does however support AVX2, which is the 256 bit extension to AVX. Pretty much all compilers support it, but I don't know how much of that instruction set can be used by them to improve performance, when compiling code designed for the 512 bit extension.
Yeah, I regret not mentioning Zen 4 in the video.
Steam Deck is Zen 2
Yo, I'm still rocking a 4790K btw, and the only reason I changed my old C2Q 9550 for this one, was just to play PCSX2. On that front it's amazing! And even to this day it has served me well, no complaints, BUT! My old C2Q felt pretty much the same as this i7 when doing some online browsing and youtube watching. It's on video games and source codes compilation where I notice a big difference.
Right now, my goal is to be able to play RPCS3 4k@120, so I'll wait for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D (yeah, I need them cores for some hardcore linux kernel compilation).
Btw, on my current CPU, RPCS3 ran quite good, not perfect but 1080p@30 was doable with most games, I even finished MGS4 at 2K@30, and it ran with a more stable performance than on original hardware. Gran Turismo 5 was more challenging, with a full grid this CPU struggle.
But you are right, a CPU with AVX512 is a requirement for decent RPCS3 utilization. Just like SEE4.1 is a requirement for PCSX2. Can you use something else instead of those extension? Yes, ofc, but the performance won't be the best possible.
Nice video mate!
Cheers!
Thanks man. I'm glad you found some value out of it.
I was in similar shoes to yours, except I only had a 4670 until the end of last year. I went now with a 13600K to make sure I can emulate the PS3 well and do recording at the same time. I am not disappointed. Good luck with the 9950X3D when you get it!
As some one who doesnt know much and just found this emulator and downloaded it a week ago im just impressed that the ps3 is now retro and can be emulated my pc is a best buy pre build from 2019 and a 1660 super so a little dated but it still runs most games above 60 fps upscaled 200% res
Nice.
If you just found that PS3 can be emulated... X360, WiiU and even Switch can be emulated too
Ps4 and ps5 @@Xenotester
You have a strange definition of retro.
@@donkalinga3059 You can already kill some bosses in bloodborne on pc. Progress is insane.
Thumbnail is wild tho
It catches the eye, yes.
Everything is wild or crazy these days. Expand your vocabulary.
@@kennymccormick8295 big L
@@SRC267🤡
Both Xenia and RPCS3 are too demanding. This is stupid. Xenia is 70% broken to this day, RPCS3 is still a mess and a PS4 emulator will be way faster. (shadPS4 is an example)
Well 4 cores 8 threads as way back as sandy bridge i.e i7 2600k can play a good amount of 3rd party (Playable) titles it's only first party titles or games that uses the PS3 architecture more effectively i.e Gran Turisimo 5,6 , Killzone 2,3 TLOU & stuff like GTA 5 & Infamous these really need as much cores & AVX 512 to get playable framerate. The PS3 architecture was hard to work with for game developers so some of them used easier ways to utilize the ps3 in turn they lost a lot of performance & or fidelity whilst others leaned into the architecture that brought us Impressive visuals and performance at the time. That is somewhat correlated to how easy or hard it is to emulate said games (Not Always though). That is probably the reason some games never came to newer gen consoles or PC as well , cause a lot of work needs to be done to port it over if devs leaned into PS3 SPU's.
still playing on my 4-core i7 laptop from 8 years ago, but you are right, some games really suck...for example gt5, gt6, gow3, ascension, motorstorm, etc, i get like 10-15 fps
AI slop
0:20 the way some commenters will act under CCs' videos is so entitled it baffles me every time, even if I know it full well.
I'm sorry you had to "discuss" with a dirtbag like that, left a Sub+Like. ;)
Thanks a lot, man.
0:15 "Gotta recomend Valkyria Chronicles"
This game rereleased on PC (and PS4) - What the point on running it on emulator ?
So in short we need at least 8 core CPU from i5 9000 series or Ryzen 3600 and above and add patches to games and change some settings
Yup, just like we always knew from the start. The emulator is not optimized for low-end computers.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 You cannot "optimize" away insufficient performance. *Everything* meaningful in PS3 emulation is CPU-bound. RPCS3 running on low-end computers is a pipe dream that will only come true when "low-end" is equivalent to current day high-end. The sad reality is Sony created a beast in the PS3, the CELL CPU. Not to mention on the real hardware the game is running directly on the console, whereas in emulation its in some program that creates an environment that the game expects to be in and mimics a real PS3 so that the games can run in this fake "PS3 container" (can't think of a better term). Doing all of this, instead of just running the game itself, adds a very significant amount of overhead that the real hardware doesn't have.
I would like to mention that I'm not telling you this out of any dislike, rage or malice; I simply feel like it's incorrect to say that the emulator isn't optimized for low-end devices when that's just not really a thing that can be done, and wanted to share why if you aren't already knowledgeable. If you are then I wasted my time, and sorry for wasting yours lol
I've been using my go-to i7 13700f, and it's been holding up nicely with rpcs3! sure there is a little bit of stuttering, of course, but it's nothing to complain about
It does well because you have many cores and threads.
Do you have any experience with RPCS3 running on Macs? I have access to M2-based laptops with either 8gb or 16gb of ram. I have a few PS2 games I never experienced which I want to play through using PCSX2 (which works fine most of the time, unless I try to enhance the visuals too much) but then I wanted to move on to the PS3 era to play some of the games I played/could've played back in the day (I was an xbox360 owner as a kid). Do you reckon the M2 mac will suffice for RPCS3?
Is there something wrong with Ryzen 7000? it got avx512 as far as I know
Yes, it does. I should've mentioned that in the video. Sorry.
Sort of, 256 bit and not full 512. Ryzen 9000 Will be full
Still S-tier RPCS3 CPUs.
I5 10400 get the job done for me. Even plays the majority of games that are listed as "in game". Xenia performance is great on the few games that work but the UI sucks for normal users.
Compared to where we came from Im pretty excited for both emulators and see them only getting better.
Love this channel and would love to see a deep dive into Xemu, Dolphin and Cemu.
I'm considering your suggestions. Glad you like the video, mate.
@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 I second this. I have learned so much from your channel i would love to see these videos in the future thank you so much 👍
Intel Core i5-4460 CPU and GTX 750 ti GPU. I played demon souls and god of war 3. Both work very well without any frame drops.
MGS4 is a pain to get to run
On an extremely tight budget I had a lot of luck with a Xeon 1660v4 (similar to 2667v4). 8C/16T similar to 1700X with TSX instructions to help it. Mobo, CPU w/ 16gb DDR4 is like 60 bucks total. I only played Killzone 3, Wipeout HD and Drakengard 3 and performance was great in all of them, unless I tried pushing over the stock FPS cap (though Drakengard was fine up to 90fps IIRC).
Anyone know why the folder in which RPCS3 comes in is growing in size? I've looked a bit into it and I keep reading something about PPU LLVM and SPU? Is there a way to compress this?
its the ppu modules and spu shader cache for your games thats useful for making your games smooth and stutter free. thats why RPCS3 has the "Compiling Shaders" message. and to answer your question, probably not.
@@iregreteverything-e4k Thanks. It turns out the cache isn't the thing that is drastically changing the size of RPCS3. It was the format of the games. I had a few games in the RAP format and they had to be installed into my PC before playing them. JB format seems to fix this annoyance.
Good for you, dude. Hope you enjoy Emulating Your Ps3 games.
I have amd 5 7600x cpu and 4060 gpu it works amazingly on rcps3 for most games
you can do rpcs3 using a ryzen 3600 no problem. you just need to not exceed console specifications so whatever the game originally ran on so drakenguard 3 being 720p 30fps.
avx512 is not necessary. it can give a solid improvement in efficiency of upto 30% in some games but mainly it's there for those looking to upscale or do 60fps mods. Around the time this video was released there were massive performance increases of practically double the frames due to overhauling the SPU code as well.
What's the point then emulating? lol
@@main_tak_becus6689 many reasons. this console is 18 years old. that means controllers are failing. the store does not work well, many limitations compared to pc, like data loading times, more ergonomic solutions to play, playing backups of your stuff if your ps3 failed (the phats are know to have memory issues now), save states...
The new Apple M series of chips can run it very well. I get great performance even in dynasty warrior games with shit flying everywhere
Lmao, I was scared I’d make a cameo in that vid. Glad I didn’t ask any questions that sounded stupid. Also, sadly yes. This emu is hard to run. My steam deck can’t run it. Maybe legion go will do the job? I will find out soon enough.
I was respectful. It was not my intention to embarrass anyone lol.
it runs on my legion go but i've not really thrown anything too heavy at it yet. Was getting about 35-60fps on infamous with an average of about 45. Tekken 5, Tag HD run fantastic.
Man, I just wanted to play Uncharted, Infamous and other PS3 exclusives on the emulator, but here it's 20 fps or below.
There is also the Xbox 360 emulator, Naruto exclusives are never playable with decent fps or without glitches.
Yes, 7th-gen emulation is a bit messy. All we can do it wait.
me sitting here with my i5-4590 and gtx 1650: 😥
I just want to play UFC man. In my old laptop that supports the game but rpcs3 you know
rpcs3 is a very dissapointing emulator.. Even after 20 years from the release of PS3, it is still not reliable on most medium to high graphics game...
The most disappointing thing is the custom cell CPU found in PS3. If they went with something more straightforward the emulation and development would be much easier.
@@ProtectusCZyour IQ is low Beyond explanation!!!
@@ProtectusCZ Sony was originally going to use the SPUs for graphics processing iirc, they added the RSX when they heard Xbox 360 will have much more powerful graphics hardware.
this explains A LOT 🤣😅
My 7800X3D is doing fine...
I don't expect anything less.
Rpcs3 is cpu heavy but you can play on 2k or 4k upscale
xenia is gpu heavy but you can't play on 2k or 4k it's need rtx 4090 to get 60fps!!!!
The situation of emulators is very poor even after years of updates
You're right, but don't tell the developers of RPCS3. They'll get a hissy fit and ban you from their Discord server. That's what happened to me.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 I'm not interested to get ban 😂
We are stuck with a bunch of incapable devs working on these 2. Heck Xenia is even more of a mess, with every "build" there's always a huge downgrade in it, they're not even capable of doing simple resolution scaling (uhh graphics will break hurr durr).
I guess since RPCS3 is so old, they started the coding on the wrong foot, and it needs atleast 10 years more to be good.
Microcode update disabled avx512 on 12th gen intel, I have the 12700k so I can confirm this. You can do nothing..
Really? So maybe early versions of Alder Lake still have AVX512?
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 My cpu is by day one. All motherboard are updated with new microcode :(
It’s sad… at the beginning you had to turn off ecore to get avx512, but now is not possible anymore. Maybe you can revert back to older bios, but on my asus z690 tuf I cant revert back, is not permitted
@@ON1MUSH4 Did you update the BIOS on purpose. I mean, normally you have to flash a BIOS, right? It's not necessarily a simple process.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 yeah man you can let out to date your bios, it’s heavily not recommended, for some reasons often bios updates are needed, security, compatibility, you just can’t escape, especially if you need an early version of it to keep a feature live... Also, windows updates can will include microcode updates as part of the operating system updates (and it’s included in this case). So you just can’t escape. The only way is closing your system into a crystal ball taking outside of internet. It’s sad but it’s real. Not worth the effort.
ist the 11th Gen also affected by that?
i have a 8 core 3700 i still can't get this software to run right
I've used it on my newish laptop for a number of fighting games and the 3 souls games and I'm very happy with it.
I've only get less than 30 on uncharted 2 with R7 5700X with many stutters... Thankfully it runs Motorstorm pacific,demon souls, ICO and Shadow of The Colossus just fine.
I hear Uncharted 3 runs better than Uncharted 2. So give it a chance.
is this video all ai like the narration as well as the images provided?
Bro, please stop using that AI Bot voice.
my r5 5600x and my r7 5800h can run rpcs3 competently enough really, both run gran turismo 5 well enough. My r5 2600 is a whole another story, it struggles hard, since the zen and zen+ architectures struggle with AVX instructions, and zen2 and up don't have such issues anymore. No ideia how things run on the Intel side, I would imagine a i5 9600(k) and up would be fine too.
Desktop UHD 630 is 75/100 from PS3 GPU level & running RPCS3 with this is kinda unfair to 75% level of ps3 GPU....
It is so weird that we can now play ps3 games on pc but my ps5 cant and it is as powerful as a rtx 2060-2070 with kinda good processor.
It's up to Sony.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 Yeah I know they dont want to lose money because ps now services are making them alot of money like shark cards in gta online
Does Amd Ryzen 9 7950x support AVX 12 ?
All the latest Ryzens support AVX512.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 much appreciated
AI voice?
yep pisses me off
R5 3600 with rtx 2060 will it work smoothy
It's five years old, so it might struggle with the high-tier exclusives, like Infamous, Killzone 2 and Uncharted. Otherwise it should be okay with 80 percent of the PS3 catalogue.
Can i run god of war 3 on my 400$ acer laptop?
Try 30fps
Laptops are terrible for RPCS3 as CPU performance tends to be terrible. For a 400$ laptop I'm sorry but I'd be amazed if you get 10FPS.
TLDR : Buy a AVX-512 CPU
Good catch.
Amazing video! I even can't play Infamous due to these incompatibilities, even though I have an i5.
It's just a very hard emulator to run, mate. And it's not going to get better on low-end hardware either. Eventually we all will have to upgrade.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 yeah.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 inFamous has an absurd amount of draw calls, it even runs bad on the real hardware. This has nothing to do with the emulator and has everything to do with how the devs designed the game in the first place: with seemingly no performance considerations.
Which i5?
@@kennymccormick8295 intel i5 11th gen
Does AMD Ryzen 7 5th generation support ?
nope better buy something like 12600K or Ryzen 7th gen
@@Dregomz02 Intel doesn't support it
Rpcs3 is amazing and is one of the best emulators out there. Almost everythign I have plays it amazingly.
I dont understand why you'd cry it doesnt work great with a 10 year old pc.
No, I have a newer pc. It was just a means of comparison...
Anyway, RPCS3 is not a person. It's a piece of software, so I don't think there's any danger of making it feel outraged.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 🐐
Runs good on my rog ally except dead rising but god of war runs perfect and kill zone etc
technicality's aside its the simple fact the ps3 arcytecthure with its notisously hard coding . in a field were emualtion even if much stronger hardware can take years to develope . just look at were psx and dolphin are at and theyr not 100 percent their yet (but very close in my op) and are super solid on high end laptops with gtx1050 / 1060 equiviletns at 4k right now hom many years since they started deving on modern 2020 hardware .And these guys have no source code , sony employs devs or even time/ budget . they doing as side hustle. So give it at least 20 years before i even so much recomend rpsx3 to peopl to emulate semi reliabily for most when 8 core cpus become norm. because even with my core high i7 cpu pcs ddr3 and ddr4 gen ones i can bealry run ps2 games reralses on ps3 on rpcs3.
Is there any cpu/setup that can do 4k or even 1440p with stable 60 fps in sonic unleashed now?
It runs better on Xenia. If you can run it at 1080p on RPCS3, that's a win.
As said xenia runs better but I tried it on rpcs3 and got unleashed running at 2k res with roughly 60fps. I'm using an i7 13700k with an rtx 3080
What if we recompiled them for PC.
How are you going to do that without the source code?
I got a ryzen 7, with a 12gb 3060 and its struggled to play the last of us.
Most of the game was between 15-25fps, with artifacts, crashes, and stuttering.
That's what many people experience, but I got a lot of flack from fanboys for mentioning this. I mean, I made a RPCS3 compilation video and have no ill will towards the developers, but they already kicked me from their Discord server. That's how open-minded they are.
My i3 3220 🤡
So if you want to play MGS4 Guns of the Patriots if you dont have Ryzen treadripper you can forget about it?
I don't know. I could never get it to run.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 darn it thats not fair
@@ivansucic9149 its more cheaper and easier to buy a ps3 directly for now
@@ivansucic9149 Running it on an i5-12400F without AVX512, and my experience was quite okay. I can't say it'd be the same for you, or if the experience is seamless, but the first hour of gameplay was way better than on the actual console for me
Mgs4 is well optimised game it may run on mid end pc
Just get AM5. Ryzen 7000 and above have AVX-512.
What about Ryzen 5 ,7 CPUs laptops (6c / 12t r 8c / 16t )
I ran persona 5 at 720p/30fps with a ryzen 7 4800h 8GB pretty stable (didnt test other games)
man im with an 11gen cpu yet it still runs at 2 fps
Does 5th Gen AMD Ryzen™ 7 5800H support AVX512 ?
Yes.
Very enlighting video! Subscribed!
i thought it was the games being buggy on the wiki page, always wondered why my wiiu and switch emulators work playable to ok but 360 and ps3 was such a struggle, i tried some vita titles and 3ds run fine for me
Xenia is actually not that bad. But yes, RPCS3 is a pain to get working properly.
@@n-tertainmentx-tended4760 i was really enjoying Dead to Rights on Xenia, plays perfectly then i think half way through the game i hit a level that kept crashing, so decided to fire up RPCS3 give it a go, oh it was bad! bad frame rates, backgroud was a jumble mess etc hahaha
@@MrQ12elve lol
Will an amd epyc 9654p do ?
Yes, it's a Zen 4 cpu. So it has AVX512.
Rpcs3 is like old Pcsx2. too much resources for games that perform worse compared to xbox 360.
Me over here playing ps3 games on my rog ally perfectly fine.
I'm happy for you, mate. Well done.
the emulator can only support 16 threads, trying to use anymore leads to crashing on start up
7840HS
Great video. I've been saying this for years. RPCS3 is just bad. It has everything implemented in it badly. No hardware could emulate anything properly. It's a bad emulator design overall. It sucks.
Well it's the only way to play ps3 titles with improved performance on a lot of games like mgs 4
@@nthnglsn Hah! MGS4 is coming in mastercollection 2
@@saurabhpathakYT OK. I was just giving an example. There are other games that play great on rpcs3. You just like to shit talk.
This
Buy ps3
It's dead console
Load screens are a nightmare. SSDs and emulation is the way brother.
Does AMD Ryzen 7 5800H support AVX512 ?
No, only AVX2
Does 5th gen AMD Ryzen 7 support AVX512 ?
google cpus list with it and you get the answers
Only Zen 4 and Zen 5 (Ryzen 7000, 8000 and 9000)
@@gamesk6476 I checked thought steam app, it doesn't support it
Does AMD Ryzen 7 5800H support AVX512 ?
The Ryzen 7000 series supports AVX512, yes.