UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary) #38
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 10. 2022
- ⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamacademy.com/
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamacademy.com/submit...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
I'd have to argue that the van driver in #4 is not a COMPLETE idiot. The merge point was imminent, and cammer's lane was closing. Van driver had no right to play policeman and attempt to straddle both lanes (idiotic), but that close to the merge point, it might just encourage the zipper merge behind it. The car in front of cammer got away with a sneaky one, and cammer was obviously determined to do likewise - which, in that congestion, was always likely to be a loser. So, cammer decides the last chirp will be his, cuts onto the hatching (not allowed) and attempts then to cut across in front of the van in order to show who's boss. The cammer is the greater idiot in my opinion; but the whole shebang shows how traffic congestion brings out the worst in everyone...
No, the van driver had unilaterally decided that the merge-point was a good half-dozen vehicle lengths before the actual merge-point, so, yes, a complete entitled idiot who thinks he can re-write the rules of the road. Still, not nearly as bad as the cammer, of course.
Van driver #4 was quite right
To many arseholes slip through the lanes approaching a merge and plead innocent
It is common practice to block a similar lane in central Glasgow to stop inpatient cnuts
@@pauls3204 Where do you have to merge? Where the lanes come together, not earlier, that way you cause more congestion. The van driver is totally at fault by not letting people merge at the right point on the road. Tell me what I had to do in my own clip: czcams.com/video/XczMS_syTRE/video.html&ab_channel=TripleBee
van driver was in the right. its dangerous having cars squeezing past and trying to force themselves in, as the video shows. good for van man. no sign saying merge in turn, so the car taking the vido thought he had the right to force himself in, but didnt
The van driver was not in the right. The Highway Code recommends merging in turn to keep traffic flowing at low speeds. The van driver was just being a cunt.
#11. That nurse again.... Wouldn't want to be her patient....
I think she learnt to drive in Lagos, it's like that all the time there.
She’s driving as if she’s in the jungle.
insurance for nurses is really expensive. They're always driving tired.
F no
Oh course it’s in Southall
06:40 - that has got to be one of the most unsafe HGVs I have ever seen in any UK dashcam clip.
The overhang looks more than 3.05m and therefore police should have been notified and had an escort.
It’s a good job she reacted to the guy on the scooter because the corner of that shipping container was aiming straight for her head and that could have been death or a very serious injury at the least.
Its overloaded
@@klashnacovak47 which would of meant the lorry driver getting a prison sentence
Yes but the sentence would be soft. I would guess a few years at most.
#4 Yes, the van shouldn't have been blocking but why on earth did you think the best course of action was to try and squeeze past? Where were you going to go and what were you going to gain? If you see someone acting like a bellend just leave them to it, there's no need to get involved
I'm not sure John saw anyone acting like a bellend, unless his rear view mirror is badly set. When he first tries to pass the van he keeps moving forward even though there isn't enough room and he sound his horn ages before he stops.
Silly question, as the cammer tried to undertake [overtake if you prefer] through chevrons, who would the insurance companies assign fault to? Highway code says don't enter a chevron area unless necessary and safe to do so, clearly it was neither.
@@CED99 agreed, van driver isn’t the road police so shouldn’t be blocking the left lane, but then the cammer does that and achieves absolutely nothing apart from a whole load of headache and insurance paperwork
I've done exactly what the van did many times 2 lanes going down to 1 all that happens is impatient morons fly down then all traffic in the correct lane has to stop to allow filtering and the impatient pricks only get 2 or 3 cars further than they where
@@leeread2160 its called merge in turn. Your not the 2 into 1 police. Choose a lane and let other worry about merging. Use the zipper effect. Works a treat if it's used properly.
Really personifies why insurance premiums nowadays are so high. 🤨
Let’s just think she is better at nursing than driving.
Seen that clip before. What makes it worse is she was tailgating a learner. Hate to think how she treats her patients when she has no patience
Too busy eating cake by the size of her.
@@mijimonmaster Terrible driving, and the worst thing was, she showed absolutely no guilt, She acted like the typical 'I am right no matter what' even though she was clearly wrong. Got out and no apology, just started shouting to bully the other driver, what an absolute prat.
Let's hope she is better by a long way.
my guess is her patients are too scared of her to not get well
No 6 makes you wonder how many times he’s tried this
I thought the same thing. Purposely running a scam, throwing himself in front of unsuspecting motorists and probably shaking them down for cash afterwards - with a threat to report them to the police. Some people, sadly, must have paid up. Others without a dash cam would have also been screwed by their insurance paying him off. He’s certainly done it a few times, no doubt.
Many tkanks for all explanatory comments, analyses, and conclusions. Good job!
1:50 lesson for you for future if you'd hit him while overtaking, when he drove to yours to block you off, he'd be in a lot of trouble. The way you acted indicate uve lost it and there were two idiots instead of one
That lorry in clip #10 is almost certainly in breach of some regulations regarding overhangs andconstruction. You can see that the bed finishes far before the end of what looks like some sort of butchered container. With the rear wheels so far forward, then there will inevitably a massive amount of swing-out at the rear. Also, any load near the rear is going to have a serious effect on the centre of gravity and affect its stability. There is also no under-run guard at the rear, although that's just as well for the pedestrian. It looks like an unofficial and dangerous modification to me. It's more like the stuff you see done in some developing countries.
The most dangerous HGV I have ever seen in the UK
@@cactusbase3088 Ive seen it done recently but that looked like a 40 foot box mounted on a flatbed that was not even 3/4's of the containers total length, I would doubt it was probably secured either as you need twistlocks and not chains to hold something of that weight securely.
It smacked to me of a cheapo lets move this without the necessary skeleton trailer and tractor unit because the price we quoted doesn't run to a proper rig operation.
Indeed Regulation 82(7) of the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 (C&U), as amended. Over 3.05m it should have had an escort and police notification 2 days prior.
The truck is perfectly legal. It’s an extendable body specially designed to move loads like that. There’s a company near where I live that use the same type of truck to move modular cabins which are roughly the same length as that container. They also move them on rigids. The container isn’t overhanging the trucks body either. When it zooms in on the pedestrian you can clearly see the licence plate underneath, as well as the lower crash bar. It’s fixed firmly onto the truck.
@@WyTDeViiL If the truck was extendable as you suggest then it was illegal as it did not have a rear under-run protection device which has to be no more than 550mm off the road and no more than 400mm from the read of the vehicle.
It the truck was not extendable then its load overhang exceeded the permitted limit for an unescorted load and hence was illegal.
Either way the truck was illegal.
I'd love to know what was being said in the last one at 7:02. And what was up with the guy in the Range Rover - he came steaming up the bus lane and seemed intent on getting involved
Range Rover drivers for you. Sees two vehicles possibly disputing superiority, so instinctively looks for any way to barge past the pair of 'em...
It looks as if she was shouting out the window and making some sort of hand gesture at the Range Rover at the time of the collision, I wonder if there was an incident between the nurse and the Range Rover earlier or it was someone she knew.
You can go dig out the original, from 3 or 4 years ago. It had audio.
@@fredmercury1314 Got the link for that?
@@heene Nope.
6:00 I love how the cammer was complaining about how many people were tailgating when the cammer themselve wasn't able to stop in time and had to swerve to another lane to avoid a collision.
Ruby Dashcam Academy sometimes adds the comments themself and just the cammers' comments
I think it’s the person whose CZcams channel this is making the comments as opposed to the actual cammer?
I think the channel owner writes the captions, not the cammers themselves. I imagine (well, hope) they were including the cammer in the comment about tailgating.
I love the fact that the Driving lane was almost empty, as was the first overtake lane, and the second overtake lane was tailgating traffic!!
@@michaelrogers4120 Seem to be normal operating procedure on practically all multi lane highways in this country now. You should try whilst doing the speed limit undertaking the outside lane hoggers and see how quickly some of them get totally bent &twisted beyond reason and suddenly want to cut back in & cut you off for having the temerity of showing them the error of their ways and driving sensibly. 8/10 it'll be a top end German brand as well: Audi; BMW; Mercedes, the other 2: Range/Land Rover plus a cock in a van, usually but not always white!
8:04 crazy woman wawing hand like it's fault of someone else. I bet she lied about accident just like that cyclist.
AS the blurb says, there were cars in front, where was she going to go? Daft bint, I wouldn't want her as my carer with that utter lack of common sense, impatience, and or ability to pay attention.
@6:00 why is the outside lane used for overtaking full while the two inside lanes are empty? A
Whenever you react to someone. They own you. The angrier the rager. The more issues they have.
#3 stuff like this happens in York all the time. People pull out from a T-Junction trying to join a busy main street and cause more issues than just waiting for a patient gap, people often hold back to allow for traffic to join the main road too.
The black car should not have stopped in that junction. If they had held back then there would have been no problem. The cammer was more sensible.
York is a beautiful nightmare
@@TristanSplunge Nice quote :)
@@TristanSplunge York is where I was born and raised. It WAS a lovely place to live. I wouldn't want to live there now, and that's in spite of living only 20 miles away!
I live there, it's full of clueless morons. Outer ring road is 60mph ,A19 from outer ring road to Thirsk is 60mph unless stated. Yet day in day out you have fools doing a good 25mph under the limit...
That Croydon flyover van driver was deliberately driving over the centre line to stop anyone overtaking or undertaking as the two lanes merged into one.
“None Shall Pass….” Complete and utter dumbass…..!!! Totally devoid of basic intelligence and lacking the requisite psychological profile to sit behind the wheel of any vehicle…..🙄
Yep, gets my goat when people like that van driver think they are the road police. Should be reported for obstruction.
@@xorsyst1 I think the Police can charge them with driving without due care.
The clip with the cyclist that rode straight out in front of the car.
He is saying "look at the lines, look at the lines". You mean the road markings that show that not only did he have give way markings so the car had priority, he was also on the wrong side of the road as well because he was on the side for the vehicles turning into the side road.
He was just a scammer, deliberately trying to make a quick buck out of unsuspecting folk. Thinks he’ll get away with it by being black and intimidating - gives the rest of us a bad name too - we’re not all like that….🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
Bloke on bike (BOB) not a cyclist. Cheers
Hopefully he was fined for dangerous riding. Or is that something only car drivers can get blamed for…?
In that same vein the cammer shouldn't have blocked the junction, there was nowhere near enough room between her car and the van in front
Paul Cullen.........i was surprised he didnt pull a machete out from his jogger suit.
That last driver has the air of someone who, even after seeing the dashcam footage and being told she is in the wrong by all witnesses, both insurance companies and even the police, would still insist that she was in the right.
John and Co are a pair of laughs aren't they 😆
John needs to teach her how to use the camera 😂
So the nurse is tailgating, tries to overtake, then hits the guy in front and shows no "care" in the world but for herself
There was another clip of that nurse's bad driving on CZcams IIRC
Looks like the cammers car sped up when she went to overtake, shoulda let her overtake, if people want to drive like idiots let them, at least you can leave a safer distance following from behind.
@@MrGollysnake As mentioned in the text to the clip, it is possible the cammer was following the speed of the traffic in front, there is no front footage so we will never know, however this is not the only clip on youtube to feature this nurse so my guess is she is naturally an aggressive driver though if I had to drive around in a Chevrolet Spark I wouldn't drive in a manner that draws attention to me.
That aggressive finger wagging as well. Stupid Karen.
There's somewhat of a Paradox out there with many peoples driving today, where they drive in such a way as their life is so important and above anyone else and yet they put their own lives at stake so often.....crazy times!
I couldn't have put it any better. I totally agree
#4 what is it with these pricks who take it upon themselves to "police" a dual carriageway - at the same time displaying total ignorance of the merge in turn?
Obviously the cammer made it 10x worse.
Cammer significantly at fault here, ignoring the end of lane sign, aiming to cut in at the last moment and not applying proper merging technique and etiquette. They should have just hung back, been patient and merged into the right lane leaving the van in front.
@@makers_lab The van driver unilaterally decided that the lane drop had to occur where HE says, not where it actually does. He has no right to do that - it is blocking the highway.
There is no such thing as "cutting in" when people obey the rules and merge in turn - each person allows whoever is in ahead of them to go ahead of them. THAT is " proper merging technique and etiquette", not everybody deciding for themselves where the merge-point should be, each deciding on a different point before the actual lane-drop, so everyone gets angry with those whose choice is later than their own. Just merge AT THE LANE DROP, and everyone will know what to do, without any unnecessary conflict.
The van driver was certainly also at fault, and as they were being given (or had forced) the opportunity to zip merge, they should simply have taken it.
6:37 My partner is a truck driver. When he saw this video, he was saying he shouldn’t be driving the truck with that much overhang. He should loose his licence over that.
Its the wrong kind of truck for the job, should of been in a artic with that much overhang
Approx 1.50 in - the white van vs the cam-car. The driver of the car is just as liable as the driver of the white van. The hatch markings are entered by the cam-car and it can be seen clearly that the two lanes are merging into one lane Double-due care: driving without consideration.
Approx 4.18 - an amber signal means STOP.
1:30 Bloody good job that bollard didn't have to stop anything substantial, like a shopping trolley, or something moving at more than walking pace!
When I passed my driving test in late 1974, I was told that I would now learn to drive. The test is an assessment for competence to drive to an agreed standard *at that time.*
I also ride a motorcycle & if you assume that everyone on the road is a raving, homicidal lunatic, your survival skills will be fine.
Never commented before, but the one where the truck almost crushes the skull of that poor woman walking made me feel sick. That could have been our wives or kids!!! He shouldn’t be allowed to drive again
It was sickening to watch.
Not being a lorry driver, I don't know what he could have done to avoid the swing out, or see in his blind spot, but the lorry itself looked wrongly set up to me - the rear axle was half-way up the container - an accident waiting to happen.
CROYDON John is a dangerous driver, I could fully understand the van in the middle of both lanes with the intention of stopping people undertaking the queue and then cutting over to the right at the last minute hence making the queue for everyone else in the correct lane longer.
I chuckled so much at 2:14. Such a British response 😄
1st clip, it's a kerb not a curb.
@@rootuser64 Grammar? Spelling kerb correctly has nothing to do with grammar, cretin.
5:20 What is it with these people? Never *tell* them you have a dashcam. Just keep schtum and let them try to commit insurance fraud.
Most cyclists just ride off leaving the poor driver with damage that will effect his NCD but as this arsehole tried to claim the car insurrer has his details & can sue for the damages caused & the cammers insurrance should be unefected😀
To be fair at 4:46 the motorist should have stopped short of the mouth of the junction to keep the side road clear. I suspect the cyclist would try an inflated injury claim though.
1:05 haha, it can get a bit tedious to turn but yet again it's evident people are not very good at vehicle positioning. If you're unaware of the dimensions of your vehicle and cannot correctly position your car you shouldn't be on the road.
Wow !! The woman walking the dog on the pavement & the truck turning right that could have been a life changer ! Trucks shouldn't be allowed to have such a huge overhang at the back!
There's no problem with the dimensions. A competent driver wouldn't do this.
If they did not have such an overhang, they would need even more space to turn. Quite possibly be unable to get to where the delivery was to be made.
@@stevesmith7530 .
Totally immaterial, there is no right to hazard the safety of pedestrians just for the driver's convenience.
Had they hit the pedestrian, they would be looking at a charge of careless driving.
It would not be legal in Australia, I used to drive a truck there, and I wasn't allowed any over hang at all as the tray was already at the maximum length past the rear wheels.
@@middler5 there's a big problem with that lorry. The rear wheels are way to far forwards, there a massive overhang, there's no under-run protection bar. When loaded up, the centre of gravity will be too far back. You can see where the original load bed ended. Somebody has fixed a huge container onto a relatively short lorry base, and it's probably in breach of several construction rules. Among other things, the overhang can't be more than 60% of the wheelbase, and that's clearly way beyond that.
#4 Another driver who doesn’t understand merge in turn and become self appointed traffic police. I agree the camer would have been better off staying away from the van.
Horns are ment to be used for warning. Not telling some one off.
That clip with every car in the 3rd lane whilst the 1st and 2nd are nigh on empty... god help us 😂
#4 you was 5 meters from the merger point anyway just merger in.
@5:45 Mr 1 incher needing to get home to reinsert his tampon that fell out while behind the lorry!
0:45 why does the music fit in so perfectly? 🤣
I watch these videos often but that third clip is just painful to watch. It just symbolises the growing problem we have with people completely uninterested in getting better at the skill of driving and furthermore planning ahead.
Feels bit sorry for number 3. I feel like I'm my country someone would have been nice and let them reverse to get back in lane instead of all going around them
6:40 that trailer was way too long for that type of lorry, shouldn’t of ever left the depot
Thanks for the blast from the past 🤔
2:00 #2 "What is wrong with him?" It's because it's filtering in and you just wanted to get two card ahead!
or using all of the available road as it's designed
Yes, the cammer was a right idiot. Just fancy wanting to merge-in-turn as you are supposed to.
(OK, the cammer later BECAME a right idiot in reacting to the idiot in the van, but the original intention was 100% legit.)
@@kgbgb3663he became an idiot the second he tried to drive past the merge point to get ahead, it was clear the van wasn’t letting him in just accept it and move on, they’re both pricks even tho I can understand the cam cars frustration.
the van driver likely could have been charged with careless driving for taking up 2 lanes and reckless driving for squeezing the car to stop him passing, but if they did make contact it was totally the cam cars fault and he probably also would be charged with careless driving possibly even reckless driving for driving through chevrons just to get ahead of one vehicle depending on how the police see it.
@@eirebhoy132 But the merge point is where _the road engineers_ decide, not where _the van driver decides_. By forming an obstruction _before_ the proper merge point, the van driver assured that merge-in-turn couldn't possibly work as designed, because the vehicles behind him in the two lanes will be beside each other, so the priority between them will be undecided and they have to battle it out or one has to arbitrarily decide to give way to the other. The whole point of merge-in-turn is that _as you approach the merge point_ you establish priority by ensuring you are beside a gap in the other lane, so when you get to the actual merge, it is obvious who is ahead of whom and therefore who goes first.
If by " drive past the merge point to get ahead", you mean the actual merge point marked on the road, rather than where he first tried to pass the van, then I absolutely agree. Driving on the hatched area was absolutely wrong.
@@kgbgb3663 yes I mean the road markings that clearly show the end of the merging lane not his first attempt to get past as he had every right to try, the only thing that doesn’t add up is why he let the ford past without incident but not the cam driver, seems like something happened between them already to me.
The Croydon clip gives me claustrophobia just from watching.
#11 illegal number plate on the range rover
#10 isnt even allowed to drive that Container around with that truck.
7:10 I cant believe youre surprised she was found fully responsible for rear ending another Car,first of all she tried to overtake in a NO OVERTAKING ZONE !!!! and then she drove fast and dangerous then hits another car so she is 100% to blame.
7:03 instant karma love how the bully gets bullied by the Range Rover and then drives into the back of the cammer 😆
wow kellogg's doing a cracking trade again
Last item. You don't argue with her. Phew.😂
It’s SO frustrating that drivers still don’t understand how to “merge in turn” !!!!!
Clip 8 - Perfect example of why its called the idiot lane.
#8 why are so many people sat in Lane 3 when there's loads of space in one and two!
6:01 How many were tailgating? Is that including you, or do you think you weren't? lol
That last clip - taking the entitled bad driver who hit the cammer aside - did anyone else see that the Land Rover went via the bus lane to the front to cut past all traffic?
Number 4 Cammer definitely 90% to blame. Ego over safety.
In Phil's clip on the m3 can I just ask why all the cars are in the 3rd lane ?
Yep, you would probably be getting a smoother and safer journey in lane 1
In the 2nd clip the music plays up to the crash 😆😆
At 5:14, at least you got to know who he was and I hope that you got him to pay for any damage done to your car, normally they just ride away and you are left with the cost of your own repair. This happened to me and it cost me £350 to get the damage repaired, cyclists should carry registration plates.
6:35 That could easily have been fatal getting hit by the mass of that trailer luckily the man in the mobility scooter gave her the heads up... I mean heads down
The lorry driver should also be asked why he is carrying what appears to be an oversize container (looked like a 40 foot box) on the smaller flatbed thus creating a dangerous tail end swing, but agreed they should be stripped of their licence for that as they could have killed the female pedestrian through complete carelessness although they will probably plead that the blindspot on the turn made it impossible for them to see where the end of the container was.
That was shocking, i'd be troubled if that wasn't sent to the police. Lorry driver should be sacked and banned from driving
I know the road shown in the last clip. It’s has 20mph speed limit.
The nurse was clearly at faulty.
Some mad clips there. That nurse is a poor representative of the NHS just from her awful attitude.
What was the Range Rover driver playing at in the clip too? A bit of road rage maybe?
I hope the taxi driver in the Audi lost his licence. He's a danger to his passengers and other road users, if that is his usual attitude.
And, that driver in the Renault van should have got his comeuppance too. Fair enough, the cammer could have handle things differently, but the van driver was only asking for trouble trying to act like traffic police.
What makes you say she's NHS? She might be a carer, a support worker, nursing home staff etc. I don't see any NHS insignia about her person.
That's not an NHS uniform.
6:36 clip 10 - That woman on the pavement with the lorry 🙈🙈🙈
2:05 clearly the van wasn’t in any definite lane should of waited to see what lane the van was going to take as they wasn’t enough room to drive down the side in the first place just hold back don’t be in such a hurry
You should be asking why the van-driver was trying to keep two lanes for himself. What could be a better example of driving without due care and reasonable consideration for other road-users?
I think the nurse is now nursing a bruised ego when she sees she's on you tube looking silly
Big big ego😂
#11 That nurse should lose her license! She got frustrated / angry and rammed him on purpose.
#6 I wonder who's insurance is paying for that damage eh...
5:46 - Most patient BMW driver:
#11, she was fully at fault, she arse-ended another vehicle that did not deliberately brake-check her....blame on her, completely and utterly...
Blows my mind how people have the balls to be in the wrong so clearly yet they can scream like they’ve been wronged.
Ego, everyone else is an idiot but themselves, so it has to be everyone else's fault.
No 11 not paying due care and attention, if she wasn’t busy shaking her fist and looking where she was going it probably wouldn’t have happened
#11 - I'd like to have seen the front facing camers as well. The blue car and the range rover were both driving like bell ends, but what was going on up ahead to bring out their inner arseholeisness and provoke such reckless undertaking / overtaking? Would be interesting to have seen the full picture.
Most drivers in southall are bell ends. Its a 20mph road with speed camera signs as well
According to a comment above, the cammer car was a learner.
4:20 Taxi driver (Cockwomble) SC09 JRU ('7'))
5:40 Foreign car driven by foreigner driver ..... Total Knob..
#4 is a complete tool
Looked like a game of Mario karts at the end
6:40 this is why Foreign drivers shouldn’t be allowed on the roads
Foreign drivers should be required to take a Test in the UK, Our road systems & signs completely different from European driving.
Def! That is completely right. No test. No drive.
Agreed
4:46 Not great from the cammer here also. He wasn't able to clear the junction so should have left a gap to allow traffic to flow in and out of it.
👌
4:23 There was no need for you to toot, the same as there was no need for him to brake-check. He was clearly pressing on so would hardly have held you up.
7:41 This woman should not be driving, she clearly can't. With her lack of awareness, lack of common sense and awful temperament, I pity any poor unfortunates who are patients of hers.
Don’t blame the van driver at all. The cammer was pulling a move trying to undertake on cross hatching.
If you think stopping people using both lanes to reduce queues and filtering at the end is ok, Then you are as bad as the van driver, That video should have gone straight to the police, He was a total bellend.
@@17Blower The video of the cammer also aggressively antagonising the van by undertaking through hatched lines? Both were total bellends.
The merge point is further up the road and you are supposed to use both lanes upto that point. What the van driver is doing is blocking a lane that can be used upto the merge point when you are to merge zip file. He is acting as a lane polieman blocking anyone from using the empty until the merge point and that is doing something wrong.
There was at least half-a-dozen vehicle lengths of clear lane before the cross-hatching. The van driver should be prosecuted for driving without reasonable consideration for other road users. It is not his right to unilaterally decide to close part of a busy road.
Right the first clip. Why stop like that 😂
To be fair the camcar driver broke the highway code. Don't try and prevent someone from overtaking you.
She ain't anyone's hero there!
4:41 Croydon again. We have a disproportionate percentage of London's filth in this borough.
The second video is in south Gosforth Newcastle 2 roundabouts directly after one another on one of the busiest set of roads in Newcastle it’s never long before an accident happens up there it’s terrible
I agree. Newcastle is a shit tip.
Wouldn't want that carer looking after my relatives. Bad driving is one thing, but her attitude following was awful.
6:08 - it's an epidemic that's been plaguing the UK for decades.
It's the same reason why you get the stereotypical "people rushing for the trains at busy stations in the morning" scenes. I think I know exactly why this happens though.
Normally, you'd have something called a "timetable". Normally, you'd probably look up what time the trains are scheduled to leave, and plan in advance.
However, what most people actually do, is just simply wake up, get ready for work or whatever, and just simply head to the station, without actually checking (or even remembering) when the train is leaving, then simply panic when they see a train heading to the station they're going to.... of course, no one ever takes into account the extremely obscure and very unheard of concept of "there will be another train in a few minutes", so people with somehow have the misconception that "this train that is right there, right now, is the very last ever train to ever exist in the entire universe, and if they don't catch THIS train RIGHT NOW, they will never get to work, ever again!"
Likewise, as with this clip... instead of people thinking "I have to be at this place at this time, so I will leave early, just in case the traffic is bad", they're like "According to Google Maps, it takes exactly 23 minutes to get to this location in normal traffic, so I am going to leave exactly 23 minutes before the time I am due to start work, not taking into account the time it takes to actually get to the car, start the car up, stop at traffic lights, slow down for turns, stop to give way, and of course, stop the car, open the door, get out, walk up to whereever I'm working, clock in..." and so on.
Would you believe it, I only driven to Manchester for the first time this year and have also had an issue with this taxi driver.... Or should I say, he had an issue with me driving at exactly the speed limit!
5:48 the BigMoneyWaste driver couldn't see and DIDN'T CARE what was coming, he didn't have to , he drives a BMW.
did the cammer who witnessed the BMW go wrong way round rbt report it? He had reg no and dashcam footage, or does he expect OTHERS to report such incidents
The common factor in two of these is John from Croydon. Fault or not some people don't help de-escalate a situation.
Amount of motorist in the outside lane not over taking and then they have the cheek to complain about cyclist.
Reporting these incidents to the police is pointless in my experience. Have passed dangerous driving events the them as well as blatant ‘crash for cash’ footage. Result: nothing. Absolutely nothing.
Simply because you haven't been told that they've done anything doesn't mean that they haven't. They send out a NIP to the offender, who realises they're up a well-known creek and pleads Guilty. Case goes through the system, you don't need to testify to anything; police aren't obliged to give you the satisfaction that "the s***hole who offended against you has received upon their person the due punishment for their sins".
2:35 sec, the van driver is in the right, the road is going into 1 lane you shouldn't be under or over taking to get ahead of the van.
The people behind the white van are so oblivious to the fact they have broken the law and gone over cross hatcings to undertake. The white van driver would be able to hold you responsible for any damages. Your insurance company would hold you liable.
Number 8: the Eastleigh stretch of the M3... Must be an old vid, because there's no annoying 50 mph limit with ongoing (VERY ongoing) roadworks. Still get idiots there though.