I got the Samson but, for some reason the yeti sounds a little better in this video. Only half way through but, I’m guessing the yeti is best for audio calls and podcast
Fact. On top of that, it dons a USB Type B (Thick), and not a stupid USB Micro C found on the Yeti Nano, or a stupid USB Mini B found on the Yeti and Yeti-X.
@Patatas Con Queso You could always buy 2 of these and do S T E R E O like a pro / Wait, then again I could do multi track using just one of these mics!
I’ve had the Samson G-Track Pro for 7 months now. It is awesome. Highly recommend it. I had doubts between these two mics, but in the end I made the right decision.
Note to Windows users: The Yeti lets you set gain using either the hardware knob on the mic, and/or by setting the levels in Windows Sound Control Panel>Recording tab>(Yeti icon)>Levels. You can adjust these in any combination of Windows levels and/or hardware gain knob (although I don't recommend taking too long at these experiments!). With the Samson G-Track Pro, the Levels in Windows (and in your DAW) will appear frozen at either 0 or 100%, and all gain adjustments must be made on the microphone knob. This is "as designed". This gives the Samson mic a narrower range of possible signal levels than the Yeti -- but, the G-track gain is adequate even for Windows 10, and to me it definitely sounds way better than the Yeti.
the people who use a yeti dont go on this because they know their mic is the best, and samson g track users want to go on this just to see if there fanboy mic is better
@@LlfeMinecraft true but fanboyism aside, when you analyze the frequencies for recording purposes, the G-Track Pro has more body and refined mids that come out naturally out of the box. If you're doing voice overs and podcasting work, the G-Track pro can likely do both well. The Yeti suits podcasts but won't be as good for voice overs.
Now im liking this video with my keyboard banging . now im subscribing this guy by clicking that red button . now i am pressing that bell icon for all the updates
Very thorough analysis. Saw the Yeti on sale, and because I don't buy into hype, figured I'd loook up a solid comparison betweeen the Yeti and the Samson (since I've always used Samson microphones), and I've gottta say, I'm glad I did. I'm gonnna stick with upgrading to the G-Track in the future, seeeing as it fits my neeeds bettter. Anywho, thanks for the awesome video, and keeep up the goood work!
I pressed play from the email link without looking at the title and then thought 'Eh?' when I thought I heard G-Crack Pro and then thought that had to have been some great mic to be called crack! I would say the G-Crack Pro edged it tho.
I liked the Samson better too. I hate to say this. If they left out the instrument and mix ability and kept the sound and made the price the same as the Blue. Perfection. I don't need the mix or instrument support. But hey Samson thinks otherwise, so there you go. Great videos. I think you have the most captivating Mic vids I have seen so far. They are definitely not boring. Keep 'em coming!
Its not a pro mic. If you wanna record music it doesnr work well. Alone because of the non existing drivers. Still it sounds so well... So yes youre right those extra functions are not really working for serious musicions so the could just left them out.
Hello, I've just got Samson G-track pro as a present:) Feel happy. Could you tell me what soft you use to get the mic and instrument written in individual mono tracks?
@@user-vz6rr7nw2l He uses Logic. However, you can do that with just about any DAW if you use ASIO protocol (MME doesn't support it). On Windows, you'll need an ASIO driver (do *_NOT_* use ASIO4All. It's crap).
Very tough choice to make between these two high-end microphones. I ultimately went with the Yeti in my preferred color scheme, but the Yeti Pro apparently is a bit of a step up in terms of recording quality and also has a port for XLR cable.
This was super helpful. I do not know much about audio but with your videos I get the confidence to make a good informed decision. That Blue Yeti seems like what I need. I currently use a Blue Snowball.
For me, Samson has a little more deeper sensation, perfect for voice act, but i've noticed it sounds little "plastic" sometimes, if that makes any sense, Blue Yeti in my opinion has a better neutral and natural sound, is cheaper and has 4 patterns...
I actually thought the Yeti had a better more fuller sampling of the acoustic guitar. The Samson seemed to remove the lower range which for me is what makes a acoustic guitar sound wonderful. I would go with Samson for voice. Yeti for quitar or singing. Very close testing otherwise.
You should previce in your videos that listening with quality headphones is recommended. I've watched several of your videos on my newest model phone and laptop. I didn't really hear much of a difference in your videos until I used quality headphones.
Other videos I watch, I hear a huge difference. I also own both these mics so I am very familiar with sound signature without CZcams compression. I honestly couldn't hear much of a difference in this video, even with various high-end headphones, a decent DAC, and decent monitors.
Hi so what is your opinion? If mainly to be used for creating youtube video, recording speech or singing....Which one in your opinion is the better choice? Thank you.
I find the Yeti both harsh and a little boomy somehow. Like it has a noticeable high end (but so does almost every sub $300 mic) but it also sounds slightly like it's *poorly* (imo) coloured to have extra bass for a broadcast sound. The G-Track Pro is definitely a lot better sounding on cardoid mode and bi-directional mode. I think the Yeti has a slightly better performance in the omnidirectional mode. But I don't think that slightly better performance in omni is worth the clear superiority in both cardoid and bi-directional mode. Plus the G-Track Pro has a better sampling rate and the instrument input which I do think you'll want if you're recording instruments.
I feel like people with voices that are pure high tones shouldn't be doing voice reviews with microphones. We need to hear voices with more mid and low tones in order to actually know how it will sound.
So here's the basics. Samson is overall better if you know what you're doing. Yeti might sound better out of the box though before any editing. The issue with Samson is that they don't have an officially supported shock mount, which makes it really hard to get professional recordings if you accidentely bump the table just a TINY bit. It picks up EVERYTHING.
The samson sounds clearer bc it takes less low end, and has a higher bit rate, but it gives a tad nasaly sound, especially when he was talking close to it, and when playing the guitar. The Yeti sounds good overall for both guitar and voice, with no proximity effect, and a nice low end precense
Thank you for the detailed comparison. I wanna buy a microphone for recording my vocal and acoustic upright piano together. Sometimes I will also want to record my vocal with my electronic keyboard. This pulls me towards gtrack pro as it has a line input. But if I select the gtrack pro I'm gonna loose stereo recording option of the Yeti. What do you say? Which one should I buy for my purpose. Is stereo recording essential? I'm new to the recording thing. Kindly help me choose
One problem with both is that the "cool-looking" desktop stands put the mic too far from your mouth (unless you are 4 feet tall) -- which creates the challenge of putting it onto a mic stand or boom arm that lets you comfortably adjust the angle. And it seems to me the G-Track Pro has the advantage of coming with a good adapter for that, while the Yeti just has the straight-up 5/8 in hole in the bottom. One of the things I dislike about the Yeti is that if you do take it off the desktop stand, it's hard to put it back in just right, with those little custom, curvy washers. (Also I think the Samson can go in a "normal" spider-type shock mount, while maybe the Yeti needs that Frisbee-sized, custom shock mount that Blue wants you to buy.) TLDR: The Samson mic gets points for being easier to use with a mic stand or boom arm, and/or with a shock mount. The comparison of the sounds is great, and should really help users decide. Great video.
I'm having a tough time deciding between the AT2035, Blue Spark Blackout SL and the Samson G-track Pro, I'm leaning toward the G-track as imo, it sounds better to me, but I think maybe the Spark would better suit my situation. I need it for Streaming and tutorial voice over, my current is a Neewer NW-700 so let's face it, all 3 are far better lol. Any thoughts? Happy to spend up to £200, or a little more if absolutely necessary
@@nickc8477 the AT 2035 paired with a scarlet solo, it's fantastic, improved my quality massively. A few other changes improved even more like general gain settings to keep the amp sounds out and talking very close but not directly into the mic to preserve vocal richness with the least echo and no popping. I've since recommended it to 3 friends who are also very happy with it
had the exact blue yeti microphone... buttons stopped working and microphone didn't work right after owning for a month. Hope I get better quality with Samson
Maybe Samson sound better for singing and quality higher, but for broadcasting, I prefer to listen blue yeti.. the character of it comfort to ear not as sharp as Samson and other mics... even if you compare it to the legend Neumann I maybe still prefer blue yeti for it character
Im a bit of an audiophile X3 so if I were on a budget Id still go with the G-track pro. Only cause its clearer than the blue yeti and it seems to grab the voice better than the yeti does. To me the yeti just sounds too harsh. X3
Silver Cobalt The G-Track Pro is pretty harsh too, but it's also very clear. The Yeti has a harshness that isn't helping clarity and seems to be coloured in the low end for a slight broadcast sound which doesn't help when it also has a harsh high end.
True true, Though i didnt really find the G-tracks highend to be that harsh...it could be better and id probably slap a nice foam filter over it. That would probably help it a lot. Plus if its anything like the regular G-track then youre supposed to be nice up close and personal with it.
It might be your computer fan. I have quite a loud fan, always have, and I’ve actually recently been wondering if it’s that thing causing some of my noise issues. Might also be my room though.
Reading the specs you provided the yeti has 48Khz sampling rate. The other one said 16-24Khz. Did you get those backwards? I "can hear" (really?) the digital in the black one. And you sure wouldn't choose an internal mic as your USB interface given a choice.
According to Samson's email reply to me today - the Samson G-Track Pro microphone is NOT actually a 24bit / 96kHz microphone. On the off chance that this is a technical support training issue, could you please confirm (in windows sound) that it is actually being detected at 24bit / 96kHz, either single or two channel? There also do not appear to be any kernel mode drivers.
Hi Bandrew - absolutely love your channel and the fantastic, thorough reviews. Curious to get your opinion on choice between these mics for a specific scenario --> looking for just one mic to record me (guitar and vocals) plus another person (percussion) for quick youtube music videos. I love the sound and features of the Samson (e.g., line input), but would the stereo pattern on the Blue Yeti be better suited for this setup need? thanks!
Just received a Blue Yeti ISB mic. Unfortunately using the iPad camera lightening adapter (with power also plugged into adapter) as described in various videos I can’t get the iPad (iOS 13.2.3] to recognize the blue yeti!? The kicker is that my iPhone is able to recognize it?! But I bought it for recording and production with my iPad. I am beyond frustrated and can’t seem to find any explanation as to why this is so. If anyone has any clue as to why please please let me know. Joseph P Cannavo
I have owned this microphone for a year and was really happy until one day the Cardioid mode sounded very low and muffled, Fig 8 and Omni sound great. Any ideas why this mode loses quality?
I don't know what would cause that issue. I'd recommend contacting the manufacturer to see if you can RMA it because that sounds like a capsule may have failed or something with the circuitry when wonky. Good luck Kenny.
Can you please tell me what connector that is for the g-track pro on the mic arm. I cannot find it for the life of me!!!!! My mic arm won’t fit with my gtrack pro
Samson G-Track Pro is hands down the most clean & crisp sounding of the two.
Its more of a clean sound DEFINITELY. Less heavy mid range.
I got the Samson but, for some reason the yeti sounds a little better in this video. Only half way through but, I’m guessing the yeti is best for audio calls and podcast
@@dantepalazzolo4904 Yeti for podcasts, AT2020 for instruments. G track pro does good on both, bot best of both.
exactly
Fact. On top of that, it dons a USB Type B (Thick), and not a stupid USB Micro C found on the Yeti Nano, or a stupid USB Mini B found on the Yeti and Yeti-X.
Go, Samson G-Track Pro!
Go Blue Yeti!
@Patatas Con Queso It does
@Patatas Con Queso You could always buy 2 of these and do S T E R E O like a pro / Wait, then again I could do multi track using just one of these mics!
Patatas Con Queso I should have read it sooner, just bought one and figured it out
Yeti for electric guitar, G-Track for voice & acoustic, in my opinion.
I agree👍
Same
Same here.
It's amazing how consistent your strum is from clip to clip
I had a metronome I would listen to in between each polar pattern so I could stay on time. =)
Podcastage that's what I thought. The click always works
I’ve had the Samson G-Track Pro for 7 months now. It is awesome. Highly recommend it. I had doubts between these two mics, but in the end I made the right decision.
@@StrongCoreSociety I personally don’t have a background noise issue what do ever. Is your mic volume over half way? Mine is around 35-40%
I almost bought a Yeti as it's become a household name amongst streamers, but you're really selling me on the Samson G-Track Pro!
Note to Windows users: The Yeti lets you set gain using either the hardware knob on the mic, and/or by setting the levels in Windows Sound Control Panel>Recording tab>(Yeti icon)>Levels. You can adjust these in any combination of Windows levels and/or hardware gain knob (although I don't recommend taking too long at these experiments!). With the Samson G-Track Pro, the Levels in Windows (and in your DAW) will appear frozen at either 0 or 100%, and all gain adjustments must be made on the microphone knob. This is "as designed". This gives the Samson mic a narrower range of possible signal levels than the Yeti -- but, the G-track gain is adequate even for Windows 10, and to me it definitely sounds way better than the Yeti.
The samson sounded way better, much better bass response as well.
the people who use a yeti dont go on this because they know their mic is the best, and samson g track users want to go on this just to see if there fanboy mic is better
yeah but it picks up a lot of noise from my ceiling fan
@@LlfeMinecraft true but fanboyism aside, when you analyze the frequencies for recording purposes, the G-Track Pro has more body and refined mids that come out naturally out of the box. If you're doing voice overs and podcasting work, the G-Track pro can likely do both well. The Yeti suits podcasts but won't be as good for voice overs.
@@LlfeMinecraft snuffer
I wouldnt say way better I would say slightly better. Very minuscule.
Now im liking this video with my keyboard banging . now im subscribing this guy by clicking that red button . now i am pressing that bell icon for all the updates
I almost bought the Yeti... Glad I didnt! SAMSON has done great for remote broadcasting at my station.
the samson definitely sounds more detailed and rich thanks!
To me the G-Track's cardioid sounds great, but the Yeti's other patters sound better than the G-track's others.
Very thorough analysis. Saw the Yeti on sale, and because I don't buy into hype, figured I'd loook up a solid comparison betweeen the Yeti and the Samson (since I've always used Samson microphones), and I've gottta say, I'm glad I did. I'm gonnna stick with upgrading to the G-Track in the future, seeeing as it fits my neeeds bettter. Anywho, thanks for the awesome video, and keeep up the goood work!
¡Muchas gracias! Fue de gran utilidad. Me decidí por el Samson G-Track Pro 🎤
Yo tambien.😀💯
I pressed play from the email link without looking at the title and then thought 'Eh?' when I thought I heard G-Crack Pro and then thought that had to have been some great mic to be called crack!
I would say the G-Crack Pro edged it tho.
I liked the G-Track Pro better for the voice tests, but I preferred the yeti with the guitar tests.
I have a Samson G-Track Pro, I love it, and it never lets me down. If you're gonna go with a microphone, go with it for sure!
Super stoked you’re happy with that mic!
I liked the Samson better too. I hate to say this. If they left out the instrument and mix ability and kept the sound and made the price the same as the Blue. Perfection. I don't need the mix or instrument support. But hey Samson thinks otherwise, so there you go. Great videos. I think you have the most captivating Mic vids I have seen so far. They are definitely not boring. Keep 'em coming!
Its not a pro mic. If you wanna record music it doesnr work well. Alone because of the non existing drivers. Still it sounds so well...
So yes youre right those extra functions are not really working for serious musicions so the could just left them out.
I love your videos. It's very entertaining to analyze and compare. It's truly an art. You helped me pick the G track Pro over the Blue Yeti. Thanks!
I got the g track pro I love it
That's what I like to hear! =)
curious.. if you plug anything into the 1/4" jack on the back, can you hear it through the headphones? and if so, does it provide any amplification?
@@burntbyhellfire8524 I believe the answers are yes and yes.
Hello, I've just got Samson G-track pro as a present:) Feel happy. Could you tell me what soft you use to get the mic and instrument written in individual mono tracks?
@@user-vz6rr7nw2l He uses Logic. However, you can do that with just about any DAW if you use ASIO protocol (MME doesn't support it). On Windows, you'll need an ASIO driver (do *_NOT_* use ASIO4All. It's crap).
Very tough choice to make between these two high-end microphones. I ultimately went with the Yeti in my preferred color scheme, but the Yeti Pro apparently is a bit of a step up in terms of recording quality and also has a port for XLR cable.
I would go for the Yeti, since Samson doesn't have stereo mode, acoustic guitar sounds great with it! :) thanks for the comparison, pro channel!
the samson has stereo mode for the input jack but yeah, im late now
This was super helpful. I do not know much about audio but with your videos I get the confidence to make a good informed decision. That Blue Yeti seems like what I need. I currently use a Blue Snowball.
wow great video. i like the touch with guitar being used because ill be using it for both voice meetings and guitar playing over the internet.
For me, Samson has a little more deeper sensation, perfect for voice act, but i've noticed it sounds little "plastic" sometimes, if that makes any sense, Blue Yeti in my opinion has a better neutral and natural sound, is cheaper and has 4 patterns...
Thanks for the great videos, they helped me choose a microphone. I wish good luck in the development of the channel!
Very much appreciate it.
That must be one of the best reviews I've even seen or heard on YT. You are amazing sir! Thank you! Love 'em both. Made my choice. Samson.
This is the best review of microphones I've ever seen , great job , it answered questions I had, thank you
Thank YOU for the kind words. Glad it helped. =)
@@Podcastage there's a comedic side to your videos , am I correct ? Haha
blue yeti had clear sound and I'm have try G Track pro its has great sound I like it keep it up #NoSleep 🔥🔥🔥
This is an excellent comparison, thank you!
I actually thought the Yeti had a better more fuller sampling of the acoustic guitar. The Samson seemed to remove the lower range which for me is what makes a acoustic guitar sound wonderful. I would go with Samson for voice. Yeti for quitar or singing. Very close testing otherwise.
I have the blue yeti but to be honest I would recommend both to anyone who looking for a mic
Man... this is a real in-depth useful versus analysis! Thanks!
You should previce in your videos that listening with quality headphones is recommended. I've watched several of your videos on my newest model phone and laptop. I didn't really hear much of a difference in your videos until I used quality headphones.
This review is so useful because now i know what exactly need, i bought g track pro gracias !
Other videos I watch, I hear a huge difference. I also own both these mics so I am very familiar with sound signature without CZcams compression. I honestly couldn't hear much of a difference in this video, even with various high-end headphones, a decent DAC, and decent monitors.
Hi so what is your opinion? If mainly to be used for creating youtube video, recording speech or singing....Which one in your opinion is the better choice? Thank you.
G track pro shall be mine thank you for this video sir
There's a reason why I bought the Samson G-Track Pro, being that I love the audio quality.
Hey man, great comparative review
Oh good lord the first acoustic riff sounded amazing on the samson
I wasnt always a fan the blue yeti cuz of its round look so i like samson g track pro for its edgy look
*EDGY*
Samson sounds great. The Yeti still sounds like a Yeti.
I find the Yeti both harsh and a little boomy somehow. Like it has a noticeable high end (but so does almost every sub $300 mic) but it also sounds slightly like it's *poorly* (imo) coloured to have extra bass for a broadcast sound.
The G-Track Pro is definitely a lot better sounding on cardoid mode and bi-directional mode. I think the Yeti has a slightly better performance in the omnidirectional mode. But I don't think that slightly better performance in omni is worth the clear superiority in both cardoid and bi-directional mode. Plus the G-Track Pro has a better sampling rate and the instrument input which I do think you'll want if you're recording instruments.
nope
just got this samson pro used-like new for $90. hopefully it comes in working, but cant wait to use it
I feel like people with voices that are pure high tones shouldn't be doing voice reviews with microphones. We need to hear voices with more mid and low tones in order to actually know how it will sound.
Good point
What I ascertained from this vid is I need another Tele Deluxe '72. Every few years gotta do it again....
Awesome video! I definitely like the G-Track Pro better! Thanks for your review!
Great review.
Which microphone is better for recording music , Blue Raspberry or Samson G-Track?
um we are talking about a blue yeti here not a raspberry but if you want instruments i recommend the blue yeti because it has a softer sound
Samson G-Track. Its meant for instruments lmao.
So here's the basics. Samson is overall better if you know what you're doing. Yeti might sound better out of the box though before any editing.
The issue with Samson is that they don't have an officially supported shock mount, which makes it really hard to get professional recordings if you accidentely bump the table just a TINY bit. It picks up EVERYTHING.
Very well done! Thank you!
The samson sounds clearer bc it takes less low end, and has a higher bit rate, but it gives a tad nasaly sound, especially when he was talking close to it, and when playing the guitar. The Yeti sounds good overall for both guitar and voice, with no proximity effect, and a nice low end precense
Great review. Love those glasses! I got the same impression as you. The Samson is the better choice for music, the Yeti for spoken word.
Hi, Do you think the Samson Gtrack Pro is better than the ATT2020 for music ? that 24bit really makes a difference ?
You should have done the singing on the G-track with your Guitar plugged in and recording. To show off its features~
Yeah I should have.
Samson G-Track Pro or Blue Yeti X?
I noticed the pleasant Stereo mode of the Blue Yeti, which the Samson seems to lack.
Great video, made my choice easy!
Thank you for the detailed comparison.
I wanna buy a microphone for recording my vocal and acoustic upright piano together. Sometimes I will also want to record my vocal with my electronic keyboard. This pulls me towards gtrack pro as it has a line input.
But if I select the gtrack pro I'm gonna loose stereo recording option of the Yeti.
What do you say? Which one should I buy for my purpose. Is stereo recording essential? I'm new to the recording thing. Kindly help me choose
if your voice is treble, the better is the Samson.
if your voice is bass, the better is the Yeti
If I didn't already have a NT-1A It would be the Samson as my choice.
Yeti
One problem with both is that the "cool-looking" desktop stands put the mic too far from your mouth (unless you are 4 feet tall) -- which creates the challenge of putting it onto a mic stand or boom arm that lets you comfortably adjust the angle. And it seems to me the G-Track Pro has the advantage of coming with a good adapter for that, while the Yeti just has the straight-up 5/8 in hole in the bottom. One of the things I dislike about the Yeti is that if you do take it off the desktop stand, it's hard to put it back in just right, with those little custom, curvy washers. (Also I think the Samson can go in a "normal" spider-type shock mount, while maybe the Yeti needs that Frisbee-sized, custom shock mount that Blue wants you to buy.) TLDR: The Samson mic gets points for being easier to use with a mic stand or boom arm, and/or with a shock mount. The comparison of the sounds is great, and should really help users decide. Great video.
Can you play some metal music next time you say "metal body...metal grill" ?
Can I just ask if you can make a video about SuperLux E205 USB Condenser Microphone you can find it on gear best
Thank you so much, straight to the point very useful
I'm having a tough time deciding between the AT2035, Blue Spark Blackout SL and the Samson G-track Pro, I'm leaning toward the G-track as imo, it sounds better to me, but I think maybe the Spark would better suit my situation.
I need it for Streaming and tutorial voice over, my current is a Neewer NW-700 so let's face it, all 3 are far better lol.
Any thoughts?
Happy to spend up to £200, or a little more if absolutely necessary
What did you go with?
@@nickc8477 the AT 2035 paired with a scarlet solo, it's fantastic, improved my quality massively. A few other changes improved even more like general gain settings to keep the amp sounds out and talking very close but not directly into the mic to preserve vocal richness with the least echo and no popping.
I've since recommended it to 3 friends who are also very happy with it
I'd buy both
I know the feeling.
had the exact blue yeti microphone... buttons stopped working and microphone didn't work right after owning for a month. Hope I get better quality with Samson
I wish you best of luck. Sucks that happened with the Yeti.
Maybe it's just me but, they both sounded great and if you don't need excess versatility then go for the cheaper option.
Can you please do a blue yeti vs. Samson c01u pro? Pretty please???
Blu yetti pro vs samson g track pro
yo! why not a test with the guitar connected to Gtrack-pros input?
So, even though I dont do music, I will be choosing the gtrack. IMO just better overall
Maybe Samson sound better for singing and quality higher, but for broadcasting, I prefer to listen blue yeti.. the character of it comfort to ear not as sharp as Samson and other mics... even if you compare it to the legend Neumann I maybe still prefer blue yeti for it character
Im a bit of an audiophile X3 so if I were on a budget Id still go with the G-track pro. Only cause its clearer than the blue yeti and it seems to grab the voice better than the yeti does. To me the yeti just sounds too harsh. X3
Silver Cobalt The G-Track Pro is pretty harsh too, but it's also very clear. The Yeti has a harshness that isn't helping clarity and seems to be coloured in the low end for a slight broadcast sound which doesn't help when it also has a harsh high end.
True true, Though i didnt really find the G-tracks highend to be that harsh...it could be better and id probably slap a nice foam filter over it. That would probably help it a lot. Plus if its anything like the regular G-track then youre supposed to be nice up close and personal with it.
Yeah. People's ears will have very different opinions of these mics.
I still prefer the yeti after sampling both microphones in a studio environment
how do you have no noise without post processing!?!? i have the g track, and its so noisey! maybe its my room???
deadhearts official idk. However, I did post processing to my Samson g track pro and it sounds really good.
It might be your computer fan. I have quite a loud fan, always have, and I’ve actually recently been wondering if it’s that thing causing some of my noise issues. Might also be my room though.
Reading the specs you provided the yeti has 48Khz sampling rate. The other one said 16-24Khz. Did you get those backwards? I "can hear" (really?) the digital in the black one. And you sure wouldn't choose an internal mic as your USB interface given a choice.
Not much differnces but its really sad that the samson does not support stereo polar pattern.Otherwise would be my pick at least for Asmr videos
lol
Yeah, right - and you are comparing a 1200.00 mic with a 150.00 mic, so what is your point?
According to Samson's email reply to me today - the Samson G-Track Pro microphone is NOT actually a 24bit / 96kHz microphone. On the off chance that this is a technical support training issue, could you please confirm (in windows sound) that it is actually being detected at 24bit / 96kHz, either single or two channel? There also do not appear to be any kernel mode drivers.
Hi Bandrew - absolutely love your channel and the fantastic, thorough reviews. Curious to get your opinion on choice between these mics for a specific scenario --> looking for just one mic to record me (guitar and vocals) plus another person (percussion) for quick youtube music videos. I love the sound and features of the Samson (e.g., line input), but would the stereo pattern on the Blue Yeti be better suited for this setup need? thanks!
Yo this was so funny and helpful at the same time... Thanks!
I was about to order the blue yeti but after that video i'll def get the samson g track ! Thank u so much very very informative and useful :)
Great voice. Reminds me of Weezer. Also great reviews as usual!!
Somebody’s heini is crowdin my ice box somebody’s cold one is giving my chills.
I thought the SAME THING.
Just received a Blue Yeti ISB mic. Unfortunately using the iPad camera lightening adapter (with power also plugged into adapter) as described in various videos I can’t get the iPad (iOS 13.2.3] to recognize the blue yeti!? The kicker is that my iPhone is able to recognize it?! But I bought it for recording and production with my iPad. I am beyond frustrated and can’t seem to find any explanation as to why this is so. If anyone has any clue as to why please please let me know.
Joseph P Cannavo
I personally found the Samson G-Track Pro to sound better.
I have owned this microphone for a year and was really happy until one day the Cardioid mode sounded very low and muffled, Fig 8 and Omni sound great. Any ideas why this mode loses quality?
I don't know what would cause that issue. I'd recommend contacting the manufacturer to see if you can RMA it because that sounds like a capsule may have failed or something with the circuitry when wonky. Good luck Kenny.
Super Dope review!!! hank you...you make awesome music, where can we find it?
Shoulda got the samson but the yeti still is legendary
So the Samson if you want to plug in a guitar and Blue if you want stereo recording. I think the Samson G wins.
Blue yeti
@Daniel Menefrego yup
@@LlfeMinecraft snuff
@@rorschach5510 wtf
@@LlfeMinecraft snuffer
u dont even need to go as far the g track pro, i'm pretty sure the c01u pro is on par if not better and its like 1/2 the price.
They sound identical on this video. I own both mics too.
Hey Bandrew, can you do an updated video of Samson C01U Pro, with only the mic stand attached to the microphone ?
FOR ME SAMSON G-track PRO WIN
Thnks for making this.
Can you please tell me what connector that is for the g-track pro on the mic arm. I cannot find it for the life of me!!!!! My mic arm won’t fit with my gtrack pro
I want a natural sound for fandubs, the bass on the g track is kind of cool, but, I will go Yeti, thx m8 :D
whats the best mic for streaming..any advice?, i hear good things about the yeti
if you have a deeper voice, you got to go 100% with the G Pro, its just better.. but if you find it better over all, buy the yeti, I prefer the G Pro.
G-track Pro vs. Yeti Pro. Which one is the winner?? I am not using XLR either.
Great review 👏🏾👍🏾
I like the sound of the samson g track pro better for voice.
I personally prefer the Samson G-Track Pro.
If you do more USB mic reviews I'd like to hear what you think of the Blue Spark Digital (and USB versions of other condensers).
I think it was discontinued, wasn't it?
Probably since the US Amazon store is out of stock and the Canadian store has 1 in stock.