Peterbilt vs. Kenworth: What's the Difference? - Big Questions About Big Rigs
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 07. 2020
- Join our Patreon here: / jackschromeshow
Hi there Jack's Chrome Fam! After the huge success of our first episode of our brand new Big Questions About Big Rigs series, "Where did the Cabovers Go?" we decided we would debut another all-new episode for you folks, this time featuring "Peterbilt vs. Kenworth: What's the Difference?" Hope you all enjoy!
If you liked this video give it a thumbs up and check out our other videos by subscribing to our channel and be sure to follow us on social media and remember... "If your rig don't shine, you don't know Jack!"
Check out our website at www.JacksChromeShop.com and be sure to use promo code: CZcams at checkout!
CZcams Facebook: / jackschromeshow
CZcams Twitter: / jackschromeshow
CZcams Instagram: / jackschromeshow
Jack's Chrome Show Website: www.jackschromeshow.com
Jack's Chrome Shop Website: jackschromeshop.com/
Jack's Chrome Shop Instagram: / jackschromeshop
Jack's Chrome Shop Twitter: / jackschrome
Jack's Chrome Shop Facebook: / jackschromeshop
Chrome and Steel Radio Facebook: / chromeandsteelradio
Chrome and Steel Radio Twitter: / chromeandsteelr
Chrome and Steel Radio Instagram: / chromeandsteelradio
Chrome and Steel Radio Website: www.chromeandsteelradio.com/ - Auta a dopravní prostředky
I retired from the Kenworth company after building these rigs for many, many years. The plant I worked at, in Seattle, built what they called "high content" highway trucks. All the heavy duty rigs that were big but not like the off-highway rigs we built for the oil industry. 6 by 6's, tridem rear axles, double frames, extra long frames, dual steer front axles, etc. There was a time in the late 90's, early 2000's that we ran Kenworths and Peterbuilts down the same production line. What a logistical nightmare. ALL parts had to be kept separate and used only on the brand they were called out for right down to every nut, bolt, washer, air fitting, zip tie. . .
Difference between a travel truck and a work truck when it boils down to it my rig is built for long hauls on highways with a sleeper but its not to be worked like the boom truck gagne uses to delivery n off load my blocks n bricks for my projects to get done or my buddies dump truck used to carry hottop then cement trucks all built for Different jobs .
I bet that was a really cool job. I would've loved to be able too work there. Thanks you Sir, for putting them out so the Country could keep on going.👍🇺🇸
Did you know Ridgeway ?
@@mdlclassguymdlclassguy6488 Yeah. I guess that is something about that job that will never be forgotten. Didn't know him, really. Just well enough to say "hey" when we passed each other in the aisleways. He was a painter, I wasn't.
I don't envy you.
I used to do erosion control and Express Blower and Finn would get a bare tractor and frame (Western Star we mostly used) then have to mount the box or tank, the offboard motor, plumb the mess of hydraulics and rats nest of wiring.
The in house diesel tech probably had it the worst though..
Play at 1.25 speed
No, play at .75
0.25 or 0.5 speed and she sounds baked...
Thx bro
Thanks man
1.5 was a little more manageable
Listening to this girls voice I almost threw myself under a Volvo.
Hahaha same
Agreed
Run audio speed at 1.25 speed, better
@@MegaShangus thanks ! It's way better now
Reminds me of that woman that was on Jeopardy.
I've had the pleasure of driving both brands, and enjoyed both! My Kenworth was an "anteater" and had a 400 Cat with a 18 speed. My Pete was the long nose, 379,and had a 440 Cat with a 18 speed. Miss both!
My favorites have still been 379 Pete or W900 Kenworth. They’re still the truck every kid draws in school. None of this new updated stuff.
Those W900 were beasts.
@@cahg3871 I’ve driven some that we’re and some that were also gutless as hell. Depends on how you specd your powertrain. 375 HP Cummins with an 8 speed - boat anchor.
500-600 with an 18 speed I might not care if it was a Cummins or a Caterpillar.
Trucks are purpose built for what they do.
@@roundsm18 both Chris, and roundsm18 are correct. Back to metal cabs, with real DOOR HANDLES....and Bostrom , or CushnAir seats....modern computerized rolling pieces of '' send a computer tech, broke down on the 401.....'' and there is others, also, parked along the route, to where i'm parked at....drinkin beer , in bunk, while waiting for you.....'' Just give me a KW cabover, say of year 1986, with a 15 litre modern detroit in it, and 18 speed with 373 diffs....
When I was a young bloke about 1965 my dad told me the story of these two brands. It goes on about two brothers, Peter and Ken Worth who started a truck building enterprise. All was going well until they had differences of opinion on future development so they parted. Ken kept on and branded his trucks Kenworth and Peter named his Peterbuilt. Much later I learnt this to be false but never let the truth interfere in a good yarn and in later years it was a good yarn at truck stops.
awesome!
You do know that Peterbilt comes from it founder Mr. Peterman. And that's not an old yarn. Look it up.
Heard Paccar bought out freightshaker too now. Going to build a brand new truck supposedly
A Peterworthshakin.
Thank you for clearing up some of the confusion between these 2 manufacturers.
Awesome Channel, I love every single one of these truck history documentaries- they are smart, informative and beautiful to lol at. But this one, in particular, is an especially awesome video because it's about the little known differences between the absolute best two brands of diesel trucks ever, which I naturally found super interesting!
I learned to drive a semi in a ‘76 Pete and my first job was hauling produce in a new ‘79 Pete with a 13 speed. Both of them cabovers. But my first and only O/O was a ‘93 Mack CH613 Bulldog. Still own it. It’s got just shy of a million miles and NEVER ever left me on the side of the road. Not Once ! I’m retired, now, but I still maintain the CDL even at 74 years old. Give me a job, “caressing a bulldog” any day or year! Would love to see similar videos comparing the Macks and now parent company, Volvo. Yes, I’m prejudiced in favor of the bulldog, can you blame me? And when the fuel surcharges began, I discovered my Mack was averaging 7.75 mpg, when Unigroup (United Van Lines & Mayflower Transit) fleet average was 5.6 mpg... My fuel surcharges practically paid my entire fuel bill. Well almost. There’s a reason it’s said, “Built like a Mack Truck” .... They are solid..... Dependable... And a fabulous ride... thanks for listening....
Wow! Those trucks shown in the first minute of the video were beautiful!
I retired from driving truck a little over a year ago.I didn’t think I would miss those farm tractors(International),but I will see a new truck and remember the times I was by myself and the freedom I felt.I just don’t miss the bad hours and bad snow storms.
Good video. FWIW, I worked in a Paccar Parts warehouse in the late 70's and early 80's. Paccar Parts is the service parts side of the KW and Peterbilt business. One of my roles there was to be a Peterbilt specialist. Even though the companies had both been owned by Paccar for some time, I can assure you that the underlying parts, and even manufacturing techniques, were substantially different. Even though they may have superficially appeared similar, the parts of the chassis and the cab were largely brand specific.
Love ❤️ seeing these trucks in the GSR parking lot in Reno.
Missed the era of Kent and worthington merging to become Kenworth!
you probably dont care at all but does any of you know of a tool to log back into an Instagram account??
I was stupid forgot my account password. I appreciate any assistance you can give me!
@Jermaine Ricky Instablaster ;)
I just about did a spit take of my iced tea when she mentioned "fuel economy" while showing the custom long nose trucks...
Used to take tours of the peckerbuilt factory in SF. Pretty interesting and so was the international truck show. Had a truck dragster. 1978/77 time frame so it was the fastest truck of the time
Today they are both very sought after models and brands.
Peterbuilt is the most recognizable show truck and arguably most customized.
Kenworth will not easily be out done ...the massive road trains custom built in Australia are a sight to see. Kenworth has a special place in heavy haul American trucks aswell for escorted heavy hauling and titanic size oil field trucks.
They both are legendary American semis and both deserve recognition.
Bilt.........Peterbilt. 😑
@@craniostomy everyone knows a peter built the entire world.
I'm a disabled oilfield driver , we ran Pete's and kws , I prefer kws for heavy haul , my first heavy haul rig weight was 60,320 empty . At times id pull a 3 axle trailer, for a jeep. 5 axle trailer with a 3 axle air pin on . 380,000 lbs net load i remember once
15 speed main box , 4 speed brownie behind it
@@freewillfarms2059 its PERTERBILT my friend, i take offense because its a very expensive machine to be misspelling its name
Pits and kens are always good for your Ego. Freights and Volvos are always good for your pockets. Big brains can combine both.
Excellent video. Informative and educational. I really enjoyed this.
Man there was some SERIOUS money/hobbies/enthusiast thrown around on this one!
Hi. I'm from Brazil. You forget when you mentioned the K100 and the W900 to speak about the Aerodyne version of slepeer.
I worked on BIG trucks 45 years. We never did motor work . We worked on everthing from the flywheel back to the brake lights. We did frame repair,convertions . We would take an over the road tractor ,strip it down, overlay the frame from spring hanger to the tail hinge and mount dump beds on them and kick them out the door. It's been my experience that Kenworth ''s are overly built. They have Un needed braces on all crossmembers ,making the overlay and any frame repair more costly than Peterbuilts. Where Peterbuilts just make better weight bearing crossmembers and higher grade steel. They are easier to disassemble, overlay and reassemble. Transmission and rear ends are easier to remove and replace. Work inside the cab on Peterbuilts you have more room to install controls for a dump bed. I really dreaded it when a KW came in the shop . Just saying.
Both are trucking legendary icons , boy! Difference is wiiiide big between a "'Trucker"' & "'truck driver"' boy !
Lol on the intro she said if your rig don’t shine you don’t know jack made me become a
Subscriber to this channel that was funny
Thank you, great research! 👍
Would love to see a video like this about Freightliner and Western Star.
💪🏾💯
I don't know why, no Owner Operator buys them by choice.
Facts
@James Marquis The FLD was made from 1987 thru 2010. There were 11 different models available during those years. The FLD was a great truck. Unfortunately, Daimler took over Freightliner and now all models are based around the same platform.
@@pauln4489 The last company I drove for gave me a 2019 Cascadia Evolution. Actually I got 2 2019s. I turned the first back in because the APU didn’t work. They gave me another one and I went climb in through the passenger side. When I grabbed onto the seat the whole seat nearly came up because it wasn’t torqued down, it was just sitting on the floor. Their quality control just doesn’t impress me. Paccar isn’t without flaws but they’re much better built than most of the competition. I think the trucks I received were partially assembled in Mexico. Some are assembled in Cleveland, NC. I came back home and started driving dump trucks. I drive mostly older equipment assembled in US. The difference is night and day. I don’t plan on going otr soon, but if I do I’m buying a KW. I’ve also driven Volvos manuals I like those too.
KENWORTH, "Traditionally the Finest" & still proudly built hear in Australia as well.
When I was a youngster Autocar was known to be the best
If Peterbilt is the Cadillac and KW is the Lincoln, Autocar is the Duesenberg.
Both trucks are equally very beautiful looking. I would have a hard time choosing on looks alone. Also, I'm sure both are just as reliable.
Prior to 1998 the only thing common was axles transmissions and engines. Not because they were designed that way but because they bought standard offerings from the same suppliers.
The PB 387 which some people call the T2 me2 was one of the first projects that was intended to share parts. The idea at the beginning of the project was to share 90% content but PB widened the cab and used and aluminum floor so the shared content wound up being closer to 10%. The 387 and T2000 cabs have similar styling but the doors and side skins are really the only common cab parts.
In 2007 a new common chassis and radiator was released for most models. Since 2007 shared content has continued to grow to a point that the primary differences between a PB and KW is the dash and the hood.
Today PB designs parts for KW and vice versa under the supervision of the name plate supervising engineer.
Both are good trucks and always have been.
Great presentation!
Hi ya all, very, very informative!!!
Awesome video , answered a lot of questions I've had since I was a kid
Matty makes my day soo much better with her truck knowledge!
She's reading a script. :rolleyes:
She should make a video about a truck, then we can see this mistyerious voice
@@tonydesaire9326 anyone can do a presentation reading off a screen without anyone there to judge you.
@@eln0n01 Cut to presidential press conference...
@@mikem6176 exactly 😅😂
I shut it down when you said Jack's Chrome Shop was offering 10% and the add showed 20%! Wow! Good job
I started out in the 70s in a C O freightliner and when I got w900 KW I thought I was in heaven. Later on I got a 379 Extended hood Pete. I loved them both.
Fantastic video👍👍
The T-700 KW I Owned was on the Same Exact Frame as the 387 Pete! Plus, their BOTH WAY TO EXPENSIVE ANYMORE!!! PACCAR if they continue their "New Price Points" They WILL Go the way of the Dodo Bird!!! I Love them BOTH! BUT , these "New Price Points" are simply Insane!!!
In a KW currently its nice I like it but nothing beats a peterbilt 379 with a hood I must say I miss that truck the most.
I left Roanoke, Va in 1978 because everybody in the east were driving cabin overs. So i went out to Missoula ,Mt and the first job i got was with MPT Corp. They had 40 389 Petes with 3406 b model Cats. What a turn around. I stayed and worked for Art 12 yrs on and off. Then VK Putnam. Sarge had big old black 389s to. I never went back to Virginia. Except a couple of times to show off 😅. Now these boys today driving automatic Cheap Freightliners and Volvos. 😅😅😅😅
I am not a trucker and all I can say is both brands look awesome to me. Comparing them is like comparing Remington versus Mossberg shotguns me I own both & love both.
I have a 379exhd day cab I use to haul containers out of Chicago. Bought it new in 1998 and have a million and a half miles on it.
So, does your story prove the saying?
Old Truckers never die, they just get a new Peterbilt.
@@jaquigreenlees Not if the old one is still running hard.
Beautiful explanation
Love this Channel!!
Thank you!!
What’s the difference?? At The plant in Denton Texas , Pete’s come out one side and the KW’s come out the other side ......
Peterbilt and Kenworth to the bone
Yes but as the song goes ...Peter built a truck for a Man to drive !
To the bone is such a good saying with those two trucks. The button and fake leather interior covers look like a casket.
Ive driven both , my last ride was a w900 limited edition, 725 hp kitten , 18speed , 373 rear gears , studio sleeper, cut back to 98mph top in .
I would suspect that before it was cut back it could top 110 with that gearing. My 379 55o hp Pete would hit 97, but I hauled heavy and 411 was appropriate.
My grandfather used to be a long haul trucker. He loved his Autocars and his Petes.
I learned to drive in a 48 Autocar.
I wish I had known the stuff that you said today.... I owned a wrecking yard full of old trucks and didn't know that some of the stuff may of been valuable as they were in the thirties, forties and fifties. A few of the newer ones I had were the volvo and the other similar sized trucks in the sixties. A lot of cab overs and a quite a few long nose highway trucks parked because of insurance mostly... lots of them were kept in running order as we would crank them up occasionally just to keep the engines from getting stuck. We unhooked fuel tanks and drained them so they didn't contaminate the engine. I had a few FWD trucks that were gasoline rigs and those motors took five gallons of gas just to start them so they went first and the rest when scrap came up so we let someone else do the work and got a small share of the moneys made. About two hundred thousand dollars worth at ten percent... they took up about thirty acres. I miss them but my brother owned the property and wouldn't let me keep any. Those rigs had a Hall Scott engine and the carburetor had a three quarter inch outside diameter... perfect for a race car maybe. They measured the mileage in feet per gallon.
Another great and important video. Been in trucking all my life. Learned a lot
@Hi Jeff Nisbet how are you doing
@@lydialas1649 hello
@@montanamornings8526 yes hope you are doing well and i hope we can get to know each other if you dont mind
Did you guys meet yet? It’d be cool if y’all did
@@lydialas1649 hi Lydia. Weird I’m just seeing this
I'm not a truck driver and not sure if I ever should. But damn these are interesting videos!
I like twin sticks and I love cabovers. I wish they would build a long haul cabover again. Currently the only cabover they build is the little six wheeler.
Both are great. However, I could never quite get used to the accelerator from above configuration of the W900. It just felt uncomfortable to me. Anyone else notice this?.
Back in the day, if you wanted a top the line truck, you bought a Marmon.
My grandpa bought a Marmon that rolled over in 1984. He fixed it up for less than 7000 dollars and he drove that truck until 2003. Only had 230,000 when he sold it, wish I knew where it went.
@@braysfinds7479 Only 230,000 what did he just drive to church on Sunday
He only used for milk runs and he only drove it four times a month on a 30 mile round trip. I have no other explanation. Maybe he was tooling with me.
Great video!
I love show trucks!! So much to look at. It's like buying a new Lamborghini then spending another 150k on chrome. That KW at 7:23 I had to pause to see. Can't even imagine what kinda time it takes to fully polish a bull hauler.
Peterbilt was started by T.A. Peterman in Morton, Washington where he built Log Trucks, then moved to Tacoma. Peterman Hill on Hwy 12 just outside the town of Morton is named for him.
1:08 Anyone else see that white suv driving in reverse?
yes part of the video is reversed
Do you mean pick-up truck
Uh, looked like a Hyundai Tuscon.
Makes sense now... =P
@James Bustard Lmfao
He was racing the semi at 1:01 and the pickup at 1:17
Love Mady's voice, so sweet, and more talking about my big love= TRUCKS.
Kenworth is embroidered on my shorts. Love the one I got and all the ones I’ll get.
Who makes the best trucks in the US then? I think a majority would agree that Volvo make the best units for here in the UK.
You can credit Volvo for forcing KW and Pete to up their quality. When they first became available here in the states they were just kicking ass in quality. It made us look at what we were doing and do a better job of it.
AWESOME.
Great video 👌
I own and drive a Pete 379extended hood but I have also owned a 74KW cab over like them both been driving for 56 years all of it long haul and I also had a 79 KW dumb truck
I've liked Peterbilts since I was a small boy, back then I could spot one coming down the road a day away! I'm thankful I got to drive one for a while. How about an episode about Marmon trucks? It has always been my understanding that Marmons were the "Peterbilt" of its day. If I'm wrong feel free to correct me.
Marmon was more of a Rolls Royce lol. Based in Texas, they hand built their rigs, and we're known for durability, and luxury. Very rare rigs nowdays, and the few that are for sale aren't really in that great of shape! Marmon offered a Standard or Premium trim, hence 110p or 75s or such.
David Blessing thanks for the clarification. I’ve only seen two Marmons and both of them were in the same “Transformers” movie!
yeah, no problem! they are quite cool. I've never seen one in person, but they are quite unique trucks. they could be specced any way u wanted, being hand built this is kind of a given. I'm sure there are a few 1 of 1 trucks out there specced a certain way!
@@daveb1081.... All of the Marmon, Pete's, KW's, Freightliner (COE's & early conventionals from 1972 to 1987), and even "A"Car O/O (Owner/Operator) trucks were custom spec'd and "hand built".... and even came with polished brass or chromed steel and engraved dash or externally mounted (Freightliner) plates, stating... "This truck was custom built for _ _ _ _ _" (fill in the first & last name).
I know where there are Two, Marmon COE's currently (Sept. 2020) sitting in a farmers yard, behind his house (along with some KW's Macks & Whites), that are in pretty nice shape.... but haven't been driven in at least, the last two or three years, and both of which, are COE's.
I'm thinking of stopping in and meeting him and see if he would consider selling one or even both of them... not sure what is under the cabs for power.... would be incredible if they have the "Big AL's" (35000 series) for power!!...... as long as they were still in running condition.... never know, with the early versions. lol
Correction: 389 was not a model until 2008 model year. Great video!
I liked to watch the cars and trucks go backward in the back ground, now there is some driving skills!
I ve ran both kw and Pete's both are extremely nice and good trucks in my opinion kw have stronger thicker frames food for construction where Pete's have nicer interiors and are better for highway use
Just hung up the keys after 34 years. Near as I can figure the difference between Pete and KittyWopper is the Pete has a $20,000 hood ornament. #2 favorite I've driven was a T600 condo. #1? A spring ride Mack Superliner!
Superliner great truck
I have a 92 T600 with a 60 series Detroit and a 15 speed with high gear on the dash. Its my favorite truck. My buddies have W900's we all have sleeper trucks and we all haul sand and rock for concrete plants. My T600 gets around the plants so much easier than their W900's.
Only difference I can tell between the new slippery Paccar trucks (T680/880, W990 and 567/579) is the hoods and side mirrors. Cabs are identical, interiors pretty mech the same, save for the company badges. I'm not going to complain though, I drive a T880 heavy haul tractor, and love it. Way more comfortable than the old narrow Kenworth cabs...
I drove a KW T660 for about 5 years and loved the truck, but with a couple of caveats. I heard people talking about problems with the DEF systems and the "afterburner" giving them grief. Almost always, I drove no less than 2 hours before stopping at a ranch to pick up my load. The "regen crap" never ever gave me any trouble. The one thing that was a little inconvenient was the narrow cab. I was in a day-cab so there was no sleeper but there was definitely little space between the doors. It drove well. I'd have preferred a 13 speed Road Ranger vs the 10 speed Eaton-Fuller gearbox but my name wasn't on the title and my checks didn't pay the bills. It was as reliable as I could have asked for. The T680 appeared to be a little more spacious but I never drove one. They showed up about the time my job disappeared.
I love the kw tall coffin style hood and fenders but prefer Pete’s unibilt flat top sleepers. The a model def my all time favorite truck tho
What would you prefer for a class super C motorhome, the conventional long nose or the newer aerodynamic design?
My choice? Kenworth! Enough said!
To me, the narrow driver space in a Pete made it possible to adjust the passenger side mirror while going down the road. The KW was a bit too wide to pull that off. Moto-mirrors were just becoming common when I retired. I also thought the Petes did better on ice, I've done the Halifax to Vancouver run 6 times in the heart of winter, I do have a clue. If you are fat, the KW has advantages.
Their both great. The only thing different between the two is the petty is a smoother ride. According to my uncle Keith for he is a diesel tech for over 30 years said peterbuilt is the Cadillac of trucks. .
great trucks for every application.
my favorite , 990.
Love your videos... can you do a difference video between freightliner and international
Yea both suck
Both did give truck bodies to school bus corporations.
Im going to make it for you right now, if you can avoid buying them, avoid buying them. There you go done
Same for Volvo and Western Star
A W900 w/ a studio sleeper is King of the Road caddie!
I love my 1995 W900L with the studio sleeper non amerocab. Cat 3406E 18 speed.
I spend almost all of my time driving through fields harvesting enslige and on dirt roads and the 8 bag suspension shure helps keep traction. No semi is really built for what I do.
Yup cat 🐈 power
A "caddie" is someone who carries a player's bag and washes his balls. Do you mean "Caddy"?
Evidently you have never had the privilege of driving/living in a Volvo 860 VNL, Globetrotter. Volvo is without a shadow of a doubt the nicest truck on the market.
Unlike Pete and Ken with their 1970’s button and fake leather interior. They look like caskets compared to Volvo.
They are both amazing ok I don’t want conflict between the awesome trucks
20 years ago, the difference was that the KW T2000 had no storage within reach of the driver (and a dashboard curved so that nothing could be put on it), and the Pete had the worst aerodynamics on the American road, blasting wind out to the sides at highway speed strong enough to blow plastic K-rails out of position. Thus, company drivers were in KWs and Bubba Bigwheel wanted a Pete. CMV Enforcement was easy -- you would pull over the KW and find a newbie driver with paperwork errors, and a bunch of minor hardware problems, or go for the Pete driver, who (with his whole, whopping five years OTR experience) had faked his logs but whose rig sported Jubitz mud flaps and was in great shape (except maybe the brake shoes were just slightly too thin).
I've always liked the looks of a nice long hood pete or a W9. Over the last 20 years I've driven almost all of them except a western star. When it comes to comfort and the ride, my favorite was the Volvo🤫🤐. They ride good, sharp turning radius, quiet and easiest to maneuver around. With that being said, I've always felt safer in a 379. And chicken lights and chrome is a plus to. 😎
There is something to that. The long noses are pretty safe. We had a W900 where a young man committed suicide by truck, driving it into the semi going at high speeds in Utah and the driver of the W900 was unharmed. Not a scratch.
As far as conventional’s go, I love me the ‘74 W900 KW. Made famous in Smokey & the Bandit as well as the 50th anniversary model.
I still love the K100 Aerodyne cab over the best. They may be hard on your body, but the look of one is just classic!
It would be nice to see Kenworth bring the K200 from Australia up to the States, I think they would go over pretty good.
I operate a 22 Kenworth T370 tandem axle propane bobtail. Turning radius sucks when making right hand turns but other than that it's a great rig
Loved the 379 Petes. Used to drive it out West. Kitty kat engine sounded like a jet. It was uncomfortable bob tailing it. Rode better with a trailer
Emissions standards leveled that dependability field,all suck nowadays
Global Warming/Climate Change is one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated on humanity. We will all suffer unneccessarily.
@@sk-un5jq well the climate has changed in my 6 decades on this planet,Ive read almost every report on it and I came to the conclusion that what man contributes to the air in green house gasses is a drop in the bucket compared to Mother Nature although the world is warming naturally it seems to be in sync with the sun’s cooling cycle. Mother Nature is smarter than we are.
How could anyone say a Peterbilt 352 looks like a Kenworth K100 or a Peterbilt 359 looks like a Kenworth W900? Put a lot of miles under my belt in both Peterbilt 352's and Kenworth K100's and they were as different as night and day, back in the day when just about everyone was driving cab overs.
Hi @Jim Nickles The one thing I liked about the K100 was the suspended clutch vs. the clutch petal through the floor on the Pete. It seemed like my foot had a tendency to slip off the Pete clutch petal, but I never had that problem with the KW. I think the worse truck I drove for steering wheel to windshield clearance was the Jimmy Crackerbox. Came close several times to breaking my fingers on the windshield, this was something GMC improved on the Astro. I guess that is why at one time there were so many different truck manufactures with so many different options, everyone has their likes and dislikes. I've been out of the trucking industry now for 12 years and just watching videos of the trucking industry today, how things have changed.
Another difference that I noticed from driving both of them over the years is that on a Pete the clutch pedal depresses down through the floor. On a K Whopper, it depresses up towards the firewall. I am sure there are some models where I am wrong, but I am referring to the 359/379/389 vs. the W900/T800. Always wished I could have a W900 with a Pete clutch pedal in it. I liked it more.
My first truck was an 87 Freightliner, and the clutch went into the floor in there as well.
I like both, but I've favored the Kenworth for the past thirty-three years driving both on the highways, off road, and heavy haul. I'm fortunate to have mostly operated Pete's and KW's during my career.
Difference in KW & PETE sleepers is KW has doors on both sides & sky roof front windows above cab & side tool box doors on both sides as well!!! KW has the factory "86 studio & Pete has "70 sleeper
86 inch sleeper huh? I got something for you to do, get a tape measure, and it's best to have the driver seat removed when doing this to further get my point across but measure from the foot pedals to the back of the sleeper on that 86 inch studio and do the same on Peterbilt 70 inch sleeper or better yet, a 63 inch, I think you'll be surprised.
Kenworth Aerodyne. First introduced in 1976 (Aerodyne 1) and updated in 1995 (Aerodyne 2).
@@UnionThugg I had a '93 with Aerodyne 2.. KW introduced Aerodyne 2 in '92
As far as it goes for me I'm going to say, the style at least, Pete's I like a lot more, but man that's a good question. It's hard to choose
Peterbilt=Cadillac
I tend to lean more toward KW, but I love me some clean KW’s and Pete’s!
I liked my KW T2000 better than the Pete 387 I drove for a short time. Both were nice tractors.
If you have an accident in a cabover you're the first one on the scene.
With style tho. 🤔
@@salvadordollyparton666 very true
🤣😂
Sad but true and there's a lot of nice cabovers to.
Van too. But not all vans are equal.
What is the drag coefficient of the most aerodynamic trucks from these two brands? It is interesting to me that my Ford Fusion is slipperier than most of the early corvettes. As this was done for fuel efficiency in cars, it’s seems to me to be even more important in big rigs!
True. At the same time Truck drivers live in these trucks and don’t want to necessarily drive a giant prius around.
It's a hell of a competition between ken and peter but i got kens back on this one🇯🇲👊👌🚛😎
Very informative
FORD CL9000 the best smoothest ride. As soft and smooth as my Lincoln Town Car, that has air ride.
Because my FORD CL 9000 has, four AIR SUSPENSIONS between the road and me.
1. Pneumatic tires (All trucks)
2. Air suspension between the axle & truck frame (some trucks)
3. Complete & total 4 point, 4 air bags, four shock absorbers, AIR RIDE CAB. ( Only Ford CL 9000).
4. AIR RIDE SEAT (Most truck).
IF YOU WANT THE BEST FORD
some one needs to drive the peterbilt with the flex air system.....i've been down road with out a flat spot on it and never felt a bump
I took the L 9000 single cab for a short trip to help out a friend and was NOT impressed but never drove the CL . What year was your tractor ?? My 379 Peterbilt although was like riding a marshmallow on a cloud .
Almost like Cadillac vs Buick. Both fine automobiles built by the same company.
Yea im a Pete guy, but there was this time I pulled a reefer in a triple digit W900, I decided then KW wasnt so bad. But there aint no feelin like Peter Mobealin!
Agreed, or its like Silverado vs Sierra, even though they're the same truck essentially
Cadillacs are not all that great. They may have been 50 yeats ago. But now its just a up priced chevy
Good analogy :)
GM quality ain’t there anymore fellas
Great video. Thorough info. I really enjoyed the history to the present info. I’m curious about Freight-liner. Not at the top but wonder how they compare? Or not compare? Just wondering because that’s what I’m driving
I drive a 2004 KW W900 with a Bridger Cat motor pulling a bucket . Works for me
nothing wrong with the bridge {mbn} engine if you turn it back into a 6nz. valve actuators make that motor garbage