Why I think the Klipsch RP-500M II is BETTER than RP-600M II.
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 12. 06. 2022
- Written review/data can be found here:
www.erinsaudiocorner.com/loud...
Support the cause:
Patreon: / erinsaudiocorner
Contribute via PayPal: www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_...
đ Audio Advice: bit.ly/3xHRYD9
^ any purchases you make using these helps earn me a small commission at no additional cost to you.
Your support helps me pay for new items to test, hardware, miscellaneous items and costs of the siteâs server space and bandwidth. All of which I otherwise pay out of pocket. So, if you can help chip in a few bucks, know that it is very much appreciated.
____________________
All of my tests are conducted using KLIPPEL Hardware and Software. KLIPPEL is an innovative leader in providing unique test equipment for electro-acoustical transducers and audio systems. Founded in 1997 by Dr. Wolfgang Klippel, the novel techniques developed for control and measurement systems of loudspeakers and other transducers are the result of over 30 years of fundamental research. This provides more accurate physical models of loudspeakers, micro-speakers and headphones valid for both small and large amplitudes. The focus is on revealing the root causes of signal distortion and defects and giving practical indications for improvements in design and manufacturing of audio products. For information on KLIPPEL products, please visit their site below:
www.klippel.de/company/about-u... - VÄda a technologie
![Klipsch RP600M [VS] RP500M [VS] RP400M - Sound Comparison with Yamaha A-S501 Integrated Amplifier](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fuimYNg09Qo/mqdefault.jpg)
đ Audio Advice: bit.ly/3xHRYD9
^ any purchases you make using these helps earn me a small commission at no additional cost to you.
Hi Erin - I could easily discern the upper midrange difference.
I was never a Klipsh fan - the horn tweeter I always found too bright and fatiguing. But that's me - I prefer KEF or another favorite, Canton.
Thanks for the A/B comparison.
Please review the new generation klipsch reference premiere rp-8000f series 2 .
@@Audiomainia2310 I found the Kef (recent models). and canton to be metallic sounding and colored.
@@scottlowell493 May I ask which recent model?
Love the A/B comparison format. Brings the point across as to what you were hearing and your listening and measuring in your testing. Nice work!
Thanks!
yeah, the II are more clear.... the 1s sound muffled
The original RP500M was the best engineered and most balanced of all their R and RP bookshelf models, and this new V2 is even better. Thanks for this Erin. After you did the new RP600M, I was hoping that you'd also do the new RP500M, and you came through for me. You're the best! No one else on YT does a thorough objective evaluation AND also their subjective opinion from listening.
Thank you.
I love hearing Erin talk about the bias we all have based upon how our ears and brain process frequency waves. The data helps us understand why we enjoy certain speakers more than other speakers and gives us insight into what measurements to look for in a speaker that will sound enjoyable to our own ears. Erin is providing such a great service to the audio community đ
Well, you can take me out to eat now.
Hi Erin. You are the one reviewer who is so good in giving as much as possible reliable data for the viewers. Hats off and thumbs up. đ
Thanks for doing a great job of TEACHING the data. I really appreciate it.
Thank you very much for your continued support and kind words, Catherine!
I love the comparisons. It's always helpful to have a reference point when shopping for a product
Erin, you are a refreshing change and your channel is a tremendous asset for those of us who live in countries where hifi equipment is difficult to demo...thank you
Keep the comparison part. I'm loving it. It is awesome to be able to hear a great comparison that really meaningful.
Ever considered also adding vocal comparison too?
Thanks, Erin! đ Awesome as always!
you really are very practical, simple, and good knowledge of what you are talking about. keep going.
Great review Erin. You're setting the standard for how reviews should be. I love your approach of "here's how these speakers behave and here's how you can get the best out of them", rather than saying they're good or bad.
Do you think it's possible for the Klippel to measure amplifiers or electronics? Alot of emphasis is placed on electronics thd numbers etc. But it would be cool to see how this actually translates in the final speakers performance and what we may hear. As an extreme test example you could measure performance of a speaker using the highest and lowest rated amps on ASR just to see how big a difference it makes.
This is an amazing review. The best I've ever seen before! The demo record is also a brilliant idea! Thank you a lot!
great review as always! i heard a very different soundstage on both speakers. really liked the500M II's wider soundstage.
Great work. Always a pleasure watching one of your new videos.
Thank you very much!
First class channel. I appreciate they way you do things. Keep up the great work.
I took the time to listen to the comparison and definitely could hear a difference. The II's didn't sound as muddled... I like the comparisons! Thanks for what you do.
Cool review. I like the A/B comparisons
I love the new video format. Keep it up erin!
Thank you! Will do!
I'd also really appreciate measurements and a review on "snakeoil" products like different types of spikes/feet, cable elevators/lifters, and not to forget: Cables, interconnects, speaker wire, etc. The community needs the truth on this, and you can provide it!
Definitely keep doing the comparisons if there is a good reason for them. Good vid as expected.
I'd be interested to see how the new big Klipsch floorstanders perform.
Thanks for that incredible review. Very helpful!
Nice review and breakdown. Just got a pair of rp500m ii, they were on sale, couldnât resist trying them.
How did you like them?
@@Filthy_Casual101nicely balanced speaker, solid all rounder for the very low price.
I know Iâm a year late to the comment party here, but this is one of your best reviews! Great job with the A/B comparison and going into detail with such a divisive speaker line (& brand!). I am strongly considering a set of 500M II as a set of HT rears to my 600M I. The OG RP600M are my audiophile âguilty pleasureâ lol.
Thanks for this comparison! I was building my HT system and needed some new L/R mains to go with my sub & center channel. Based on your analysis, I got the RP 500M IIs, and they sound great!
Great video bro
Love your perspective
Erin I agree. I had the 600m2 for a couple of days but thought for my room and equipment the 500m2 was better balanced and much better suited to my Anthem mrx 300. I really like the 500m2. Thankyou for your guidance I would never had tried them if I hadnât listened to your video. Very content with the system!
So in depth, much appreciated!
Hope you continue these a/b comparisons. I heard something going on (my guess) at around 2K. Your charts backed up my assumption. Cool.
Thank you for the review! I tell everyone that the RP-500M II is the "better" bookshelf speaker, especially in a small room. Now I can show, link your video. THX!
Hope it helps!
@@ErinsAudioCorner It does the 600M / II is reviewed to oblivion, and the 500-400M are overlooked. For a small, medium, or bigger than medium room (30 nm) these and a sub, is a much better option.
True, I have the RP500i on my desk. Its a great desktop/nearfield application
@@kirkaparty4143 I wish there was more information out there about using some of these great new "bookshelf" speakers on a desktop. I was looking at the Polk L100 or R100 or Klipsch 600M II, but I just ordered the 500M II's instead since they will be a better fit. There's just not much information out there about using them nearfield, so I figured I'd just roll the dice. I'll be pairing them with a R-120SW subwoofer.
First time viewer. Thanks for this good, detailed review!
Plus one for the a/b comparison. Like it!
Many thanks Erin.
I'm going deaf. I couldn't hear a difference on either my speakers or my headphones.
Anyway, you are great. Keep up the great work. We are lucky to have someone like you in the community.
Awesome. Great video. Thanks, Erin! đ»
Thanks for watching!
Man, the more of your videos I watch, the more I am surprised that more reviewers donât do what you do. More than any other reviewer, you do a fantastic job of interpreting your subjective experience by way of your objective measurements (and vice versa). There are plenty who will either rely primarily on subjective (e.g., John Darko) or objective (e.g., Amir at ASR) analysis, and even a handful who do both (Stereophile). But none that I know of interpret one method of analysis by way of the other. I dig it.
Well, thank you for the kind words.
What would be really cool was if you'd make a DIY speaker with reasonably priced drivers and 2-way/3-way Hypex FusionAmps, and compare the performance to commercial speakers in the same price range. You have the equipment and the respect needed to really enlighten people on the possibilities of DIY. Basically: Show the HiFi world what we have been doing in car audio for over 20 years, and why!
Awesome idea, and one I've been hoping to do my self.
Hi Erin, this is the first of your vids I've consumed. Your presentation is awesome (from a 40 year retired EE). I was interested in the rp-500M II due to the claimed sensitivity performance; but, as you noted, Klipsch's spec-man-ship is more marketing... Thus, I am still searching for a 90 + dB sensitivity bookshelf speaker that's of quality; any recommendations?
Like the comparisons.
Great video. Sound demo was good too
Klipsch is making phenomenal small, consumer speakers. I was just astounded the first time I listened closely. I could make a record with them and a carefully aligned sub.
Thanks Erin, your reviews provide real contents. Klipsch may have sold a lot of RP-600 after Steve Guttenberg praised highly without reservation. However, the measurements from ASR and Stereophile revealed a big hole in the mid range. That may have slowed the sales of RP-600. Klipsch had to come up with version 2. Therefore, the real measurements by all of speakers reviewers are driving speaker manufacturers to make speakers that are faithfully reproduce musical that was sent to the speakers. Speakers should not systematically alter any sound signals.
Based on your measurements, I would buy RP-500m ii over than RP-600m ii, then pairing a subwoofer.
My first gen I had all 4 inch woofer versions this time around I went all 5 series and love the way they sound
I never heard either previous Klipsch mk1s, but now I'm very intrigued after your review. I find that I also prefer smaller bookshelves vs their larger counterparts, precisely because of improved imaging. I also run my speakers with a competent sub, so I'd prefer the speaker to do its best for midrange and treble. Recently, I've really enjoyed the Polk L100, and the Arendal 1961 you reviewed. Both are just killer speakers when crossed with a sub. Thanks to you, this Klipsch is now on my radar, and I bet I'll like this 500 more, even though I know most are focusing on the 600. The measurements and breakdown are golden!
thank you, Erin, for the so detailed review! What stereo receiver could you recommend for it (up to $700-800)?
Great review, interesting to see Klipsch on the road to linearity. I agree with your point at the end. After watching reviews from just about every audio channel, unless you show some data, the pure subjective reviews are just a form of entertainment and really can't be used for serious purchasing decisions in my opinion.
An in house evaluation is the only way to know if you will like a speaker or not.
Great reviews and very knowledgeable. I own the rp500 v1 with Dirac eq. Pretty happy with them, would you have some technical data with a 80hz crossover, what spl will I get with these at 1m? Will I get anywhere near 100db without clipping, compression etc
Love your reviews and watch as soon as you upload! I liked the demo you have provided.
Can you please help review Klipsch RP-8000f if possible, thanks in advance.
I just got my 600M II today. Iâm a newbie to the Audiophile world. I went from a Harmon and Kardon Bluetooth speaker to this⊠Iâm super happy with the quality of it. Iâm know thereâs better out there, but this is everything I could have asked for.
The problem I found with the 600Mii compared to the original 600M, is that they are more linear and directed. With the original, you can move further off axis, and not have the sound kind of drop off like it does with the Mkii version. For reference I run a 7.2.4 setup with a bed layer of full RP600M.
Welcome to the journey, Ian! You have a nice pair of speakers. Take your time with them, and enjoy the music. As you have the speakers sorted, in the future you can play with different sources, amps and setups if you wish.
Audio Advice is a great company. They do price matching, free shipping, and no hassle returns.
Nice review. I run a Klipsch 7.4 System consisting of the RF-7iiiâs / RC-64iii / RP-502Sâs and RP-150Mâs. I am thinking about replacing the RP-150Mâs with the RP-500M2 as rears. Each speaker revives power via the Parasound A-23+ and A-52+. Dual SVS SB16âs and dual SB-4000âs provide the bass. Thoughts?
After testing 8-9 different bookshelf speakers I settled on the 500m ii and have been mostly happy until I began noticing some cabinet resonances that are pretty annoying. I plan to check the frequencies that cause the issues with an app to see if they match up with your charts over the weekend. FYI, I am trying to upgrade from PSB Imagine Mini for a larger/louder sound but I really enjoy the overall sound and lack of annoying resonances. So is this just the way it is unless I spend much more? thanks in advance!
Thank you for the video, very good !
Do you think the RP500M II is better than the Davis Acoustics Olympia One master first edition ?
Klipsch is changing their house sound to be more in line with CZcams reviewers because that is what is driving sales in 2022âŠnot the speaker aisle at Best Buy.
Interesting. Hadn't considered that.
Does this means flat tuning is what sells now?
@@JoelHernandez-tz3vk Flat tuning is extremely marketable right now.
@@seanb3303 So... I'm not so crazy for wanting flat tuning since the beginning of 21st century then?
Makes me wonder if this is why there's a sudden rush of cheap flat tuned IEMs now.
@@JoelHernandez-tz3vk probably. Having said that, if flat response loving people could see their response at their listening position, they would cry as it will look like the Himalaya mountains.
Hey Erin, hope you are doing well. I currently have the 500MV2s and am considering buying the 600MV2s. Would you consider the 600s to be a brighter speaker? Also I dont run a sub. Would the 600s provide more bass? I'm using them as 2 channel fronts for tv, music and movies.
Im currently considering these for my surround and rear surrounds in a home theater. Assuming that my listening position is 0-10* behind my seated position.... my question is should I be considering the rp 502-s "dipole" unit instead? I don't really understand when or why a dipole is a necessary consideration, only that the "say" it is useful when an ideal location isn't possible. Im not really thinking I need them in the rear surround position but I'd like your thoughts on when that might be necessary as well. Thanks in advance
Thanks for the video. Any subwoofer you recommend to pair with 500m II?
I wouldn't be suprised when Klipsch 'upped' their game based on the succes of the (for example) Polk Reserve series, a quite linear speaker. Enjoyed the demo, nice work đ
I wish Erin would do the Focal Chora 806, don't you? đ€đđ€đ§đ»
@@DougMen1
I sure do đ
klipsch upped the game way before Polk Reserve series exist...
@@net_news You're delusional! The original RP600M had a HUGE suckout in the midrange and a tweeter that was so hot that it made people's ears bleed, and sounded worse than a $200 Polk S20! They only just now fixed it with the new RP600M V2. If that's "upping the game" then no thanks! The Las Scala however is one of the best speakers of all time, but it ought to be at $13k for a pair.
@@DougMen1 well, they were a huge commercial hit.
Such a great review Erin, Iâm new to your channel and as a sound engineer I appreciate the objective data and the test method criticism :). However, Iâm quite a rookie in home audio tbh, and Iâm setting up a system for a friend.
My question is about price though. Does amazon price refer to 600$ per unit or for a pair? Please help a noob out :) Iâm used to seeing prices per pair when buying studio monitors and judging by the great reviews for this Klipsch model, 600$ a pair doesnât really make sense. Or does it?
Needless to say how important and elementary this information would be before planning a system to meet a budget, but itâs not very clear to me :/
Thank you!
It says "pair" in the description on amazon
I'm planning on slowly replacing my Polk satellites with "real" speakers. I was thinking about the RP600ii, but realized they wouldn't fit in my bookcase (about 1/2" too tall. Both the 500ii and 600ii are on sale at Klipsch for 40% off and I'm going to a Magnolia center today to listen to whatever they have. I could tell a difference in the 500i vs 500ii and liked the clarity of the v2. I have my Polk sub so bass won't be an issue - I'd love to get a pair of rp8060fas though, but alas, the almighty dollar sticks its neck in :) - I can always get towers later and make the smaller speakers the surrounds. What center channel would pair with the rp500ii?
Great Review! The 500 will probably be better for me because I will definitely add a sub with these.
Top class,tks
đ
I appreciate your reviews and insight. I have been going back and forth between this review and your review of the KEF Q150. Iâm curious, which would you choose between the RP-500M II and the Q150? Iâm looking for some new desktop speakers.
I prefer the KEF.
@@ErinsAudioCorner Appreciate it!
Damn. I was about to skip the A/B comparison since I'm watching this review on my phone, but I heard a clear difference in details even through my shitty phone speakers.
I've got, and love, the 600M v1 and they are extremely directional, like a laser. Good video, but I can't hear the difference between the 500M I & II. Erin, you mentioned near the end that you should probably get a sub to handle the low end and I agree, thus a few weeks ago, I bought the R-120sw. How would you setup the crossover on my Denon and my sub? I currently have both at 80, but I have zero idea of what I'm doing.
I just picked up an R-120SW and have a pair of 500 II's on the way. How did the combo work out for you? Any tips? I'm going to be using them nearfield on my desktop.
@@indianapolisindiana7856 I just donât know anything about Nearfield. If they are anything like the 600s, they are extremely directional. Just keep that in mind. I would also say my 600s sound better a couple feet from the wall. More than a couple if I can get it. I usually had them four feet from the back wall. I recently upgraded to fortes.
@@MidFiMan Thanks for the quick reply!
A little late to the show here, but I'll ask a question anyway in the event you stumble over it in the very near future. I've done a lot of looking around for bookshelf speakers in this price range and I'm finally starting to lean towards the RP-500M ii. However I've heard different opinions on how they do based on room size. My room, which I should say is strictly for playing music, is approximately 16' x 16.' Can you please advise if these speakers would be able to perform well in that size? Before I buy them and try them out myself for a few weeks, I just thought I'd try to get your opinion. Thank you! New subscriber btw.
Honestly, itâs been a very long time since Iâve heard these, but based on memory, they would probably work pretty well. You just have to figure out if youâd like a speaker that has a wider radiation or not and this one probably errs on the side of a bit more narrow (based on memory).
The one recommendation I would have is that you will definitely want a subwoofer to cover the lower octaves.
Hi, I'm new to speakers and I'm deciding between the 500m ii and 600m ii, i have a good deal both at the same price. As someone who loves the sound of Grado headphones, which one would you recommend?
Oh nice, thanks for reviewing this speaker I've been waiting for this video to decide. so now I'm going to ask the same question as last time, I care a lot about natural human vocals, which one do you think is the best for my needs? RP-500M II, RP-600M II, or Polk-reserve-r100?
And if I add KALI in-5 to this pick list, would your answer still be the same?
Thanks!
Did you end up buying any of the speakers you mentioned? I was also considering the 600M II's and the R100's, but ended up going with the 500M II since they'll fit on my desktop better.
@@indianapolisindiana7856 Not really, I will go for KALi once I have the budget since shipping it to me cost more than the speaker price, RP-500M II is a great option, let me know how much you like and dislike it once you set it up for your desktop.
Erin, I really really appreciate that you don't mix your theme music a million times louder than your voice. I use headphones when I listen to YT, as do most people I think. So, I start the video and then I set the YT volume to your voice, so I can easily hear what you're saying, and then when you cut to your opening theme music, it's the same volume level, unlike almost every other YT channel, where I'm suddenly assaulted with 100db blasting music, often with pounding bass and drums, in my headphones, and I have to pull the 'phones off my head as quickly as possible. So, I'm eternally grateful to you for not doing that to my already damaged ears, from too many loud concerts, playing in loud bands and practicing in tiny garages where the drummer's crash cymbal was inches away from my ear, amd decades of attending very loud concerts, as well as listening to music far too loudly with speakers and headphones. Protect your ears people. According to NIOSH, permanent damage ensues after 2 hours at 91 db, 1 hour at 94 db, 30 minutes at 97 db, and 15 minutes at 100 db.
Hi Erin, I am choosing between Focal chora 806 and Klipsch RP500M II? what would you choose? and why?
I have been looking at the RP 500 M speakers for a while and pondering...I have 2 systems and my #2 System has the R51M which are slightly rough diamonds - not perfect but just play music. My other system currently has some modified Fyne F 301's which needed a tweak, or two, to get them 'right' as they sounded muted at the top end and due to placement had a bit of a bass bump. They are more neutral than the R51M's but sound more restrained - as well as sounding also very nice. SO I wondered how the RP 500 Mii would compare with the F301 or maybe the F500 Fyne audio?? .. I use an SVS SV 1000 for the bottom end - so bottom end is not absolurtely an issue
I have a question so I have a jamo 809 bookshelf would it work great if I get the Klipsch 500mII or 600mII for front speakers and the jamo as a rear?
Thanks Erin, I just got these last week and will be getting a subwoofer to go with it. Do you have any suggestions?
I just ordered the 500 II's to use on my desktop and I'll be mating them to a Klipsch R-120SW subwoofer. So how are the 500's working out for you? Did you get a subwoofer?
Hi Erin, I've been waiting for this video to make my mind, which speaker you will advise me to get if the vocal is the main thing I care? RP-500M II, RP-600M II, Polk r100, or Kali Audio IN-5? I mostly use it with my PC as a nearfield.
Thanks!
I wish there was more information out there on using the recent crop of amazing bookshelf speakers on a desktop. I was wanting to get the Polk L100 or R100's, but couldn't find much info on how they worked nearfield and close to wall, so I ended up going with the smaller Klipsch RP-500M II with a matching 12" Klipsch sub. The new RP-500M II and the larger RP-600M II have been getting pretty great reviews and seem to be competitive with the Polks, so hopefully I'm not missing out by passing on the Polks.
@@indianapolisindiana7856 Yeah, it's really hard to tell from graphs or online reviews.
Any cons of going with 500 instead of 600 if you intend to have these along with a subwoofer and center channel for HT? Is there any reason or scenario you would you advise the 600?
Iâm looking to switch my rp502s side and maybe rear surrounds to either the rp 600ii or rp 500ii. I think that having the speaker pointing right at my listening position especially on the side surrounds will be way better than having those opposed faces. When I look left and right I see wood faces pointed at my ears, not woofers. I think that will help my surround a lot.
Hi Erin, looking to buy some speakers to connect a turntable to a tube-amplifier. And in Googl'ing some stuff I found your channel & tests. Since the Amp is tube based (2x 3.5W - 8 Ohm - 100K impedance) I have been told that I need a set with a high sensitivity (94dB or higher). Bare in mind, that I am not an audio guy, so my knowledge is low ;) I was trying to compare the 500's to the 600's. However you mentioned in the video that Klipsch uses another method to measure sensitivity. I'm completely lost now ... can you enlighten me a bit ?
To my understanding, most manufacturers measure sensitivity outside or in a space with very litttle sound reflections (like near by walls). Where as Klipschâs sensitivity ratings are indoor room ratings.
Hello! how are you? What subwoofer do you recommend for a 15M2 living room to watch movies and listen to music on CD and streaming? I have seen the Klipsch R8sw, R10sw and SPL100, which would be the most suitable? greetings from Argentina!
Erin, do you prefer this speaker to JBL 530?
I have a question. When using the data from the older design in the past, many had labeled Klipsch as "Bad", "Not Recommended".
For what you see so far, are the Reference Premiere V1 or the V2 improved enough to get back to where "scientifically", using Data, we can say Klipsch is good enough to be recommended against like Polk Signature Elite or Reserve series?
If so, is the RP series comparable to Polk SE or the Reserve? to KEF Q series? (Except the Center Channel I think only Q series can be recommended"
I asked here because It is very very hard to see someone actually did testing on Klipsch and review it in detail. And the result really got me thinking about those neg from forums such as ASR.....
Thanks
What did you end up buying? I was considering all the speakers you mentioned, and I just ordered the 500 II's since the smaller size will work better on my desktop. Gonna be pairing them with a Klipsch R-120SW sub.
Clearly the version 2 is a livelier sound , more open . Thanks !!
Hi Erin. Hope all going well with you. ICan you please tell me if these speakers can be driven by Douk Audio H7 Pro amp? Or it will be better to get a powered one like Klipsch R-51PM?
TIA.
Great review! I totally agree the 500M + Sub is better over 600Mâs. Thanks for the review!
I ordered a pair of 500 MII's for my desktop and will be pairing them with a R-120SW subwoofer. If you have any advise on my setup I'd appreciate it!
Grabbed myself a marantz nr1711 gonna pair it with a pair of RP-500m II's.
The sound sample is a really helpful idea, I wish you add a human voice sample too for each review (like Remember Me - MARLOE. or any other track), 5-sec hearing a human voice will be enough since a human voice is a reference and we know how it should sound.
Question. I purchased the RP 6000 floor speakers, but by the time I managed to get the my centre and surrounds it was the RP II series. Will it matter much for sound since they technically donât match?!!
Haven't owned any of these Klipsch RP speakers but I always saw the midrange crossover dip on measurement plots. The demo shows the differences perfectly, sounds recessed on the old ones as I expected. One of the speakers from the series does seem to be pretty neutral, though(from Audioholics measurements). That being the 8000F towers. I'm considering picking up a pair of the old ones since they're under $600 per speaker right now and the measurements make them look great, especially at like 15 degrees off axis. Bass seems to extend nicely and roll off very slowly without such a steep drop-off like most other towers. I'm wondering if there are any other towers around the same price that would be a better option.
I've got the 8000F II on hand so if you can wait a few weeks, I should have that up. Then you can see the data and compare that to James' data for the v1.
Awesome. Thanks for all the work you put in, Erin. I don't know what I'd do without the data from you, Amir and James lol. I don't think I could go back to just subjective reviews.
what speaker in general would you recomend for only nearfield listening for a pc setup (2.1) system as an amp i have the cxa 81 from cambridge, the system is only for music
Honestly Iâm didnât see difference in blind test between rp500 vs rp500 ii. Maybe the difference is most clear on telemetry.
Thank you for share this valuable information.
Objectivity. So appreciated :)
do you recommend this speakers for the Cambridge AXA35?
What kind of speakers/ home theatre system do you prefer for 16'x20' bedroom with the bed slammed to the wall?
I've listened to both back to back and out of the two, the RP500's sounded just that little bit sweeter and more balanced than the 600m's.
So if I were to get a RP 504C ii then the RP500Mii would be a good choice with a sub handling the crossover under 80hz? Or would the 600Mii still more recommended? I can certainly hear the difference in the sound demo with the heavy string instrument plucking away. The version one seems more dull and muted where the version two is more present and lifted upwards. It's actually less than subtle and makes version one sound....pretty bad and version two much better.
Hi, I am debating between these or B & W 707 S2?
In my experience with Klipsch after buying them for better than 50 years straight since 1973.. if you bought a certain model.. and you really love it stay with it.. now as to the Klipsch 600m model twos.. they will crack concrete their crisper louder bigger bass.. been pretty much will handle anything I put into they're little bookshelf bodies.. I adore love and will cherish the Klipsch 600m Mark 2 for a very long time to come.. I use them in a system which is đ made up of just this Klipsch model of speaker that is 9 separate Klipsch 600m ii,s.. in a room that is 20 ft long 16 ft wide with 12ft ceilings.. and of course I've added two 12-inch subwoofers by đ Klipsch.. driven with 150 watts per channel all channels driven.. that's 150 w for each of the nine channels.. in this configuration sounds unbelievably beautiful..
Makes more sense to get these for surround satellites than 600mII....since I already have 2 subs. Crossed over at 80, the 500MII make more sense and cost less. I prefer a more directed speaker, less side issues with walls. Super wide dispersion speakers always seem to be soft/diffuse sounding.
to remedy the difference between the 500 and 500-II with eq - would that just be picking up the 1000hz ~5 db based on the graph? or does it still beat out for other reasons
i had phones on and only slight difference to me cool video
Which center channel from Klipsch is the perfect match for the 500M ll?