Piers Morgan Critics SLAMMED By Kevin O'Sullivan Over Baby Reindeer Interview
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 06. 2024
- Kevin O'Sullivan shares his thoughts on Piers Morgan's interview with Fiona Harvey, the 'real' Baby Reindeer from the Netflix TV series. He praises Morgan for bringing attention to the topic. TV critic Nigel Pauley agrees with Kevin that people in the media should not criticize Morgan for doing an interview about someone in the news.
Click here for more from Talk talk.tv
If you need any help visit: talk.tv/helplines
#babyreindeer #piersmorgan #martha
Piers stayed in his lane, he was very tame. We all know he could have ripped her a new one, he didn’t, he stayed very low key. If this was a man stalker called Dennis, would we have compassion for him?..
If Dennis had wrongly been accused of sexually assaulting someone then you would want her head on a stick. That’s what has been done here with Fiona. Gadd has now admitted that some of the show is made up. After saying it was a true story and she did all those things.
Yes exactly he was very good he was careful with his words his questions his attitude I think this was a very fair interview as we know piers can be brutally honest I believe he sat on the fence never once did he judge her Hr will have his personal thoughts that I would love to know as he played the interview very safe
I woulnt take yiur number anyway Kevim
Sent from iphon
👏👏👏😂😂😂
😂😂😊
Her personality is exactly as we expected!! 😁
This woman may be lying but this man Gadd accused this REAL person of:
1.Making allegations against his father to his employer. And threatening the entire family.
2. Attacking his ex girlfriend.
3. Attacking his ex trans girlfriend.
4.Crashing his comedy show and attacking him violently.
5. S3xually Assaulting him by the river.
6. Going to prison for stalking a previous employer.
7.Going to jail for stalking him.
He has not proven any of this stuff as true...but created a 6 part series about her and shared it with the world...yet people are ok with how he's destroyed this woman's life. You can not make up stuff like that and label it as a true story. This is not ok. His fans are sending this woman death threats for allegations he's making.
You'd have to be insane if you believed anything out of Fiona's mouth. She is NOT the victim, Richard Gadd is.
She was contradictory in everything she said. She wants a payout & she is lying she has NOT seen the programme. If she is not the person characterised then she'd say steaight up say it wasn't her. If it is her then she'd have to say exactly which parts are her & prove it. She's loving the attention & interviews.
Fiona has not got a shite show of winning a defamation case.
The burden of proof that she has been harmed, will be on her & she'd have to bring receipts. She's hoping to get a large settlement before anything gets to court.
Agreed. Her behaviour was clearly inappropriate but nothing on the scale of what she’s wrongly been accused of.
@@mymai5859Gadd has said that a lot of isn’t true. So how is she lying?
He had a lot to answer to. Where’s his interview- no doubt he’s in hiding after disclosing how disgusting he is to the world- doesn’t make sense
Unfortunately, people have watched the programme and now have a vested interest which in essence is a clever way of destroying Fiona Harvey. Having not watched the programme myself, but have been told about it and listened to the FULL interview between Piers Morgan & Ms Harvey, I would suggest that people are very careful with their accusations. There is NO evidence as of yet of the 41K emails, the voice messages, or any of the other allegations set out in the series. She has said on record that she would support an investigation. Impartiality is always necessary and I would suggest that if any wrong doing was done, it will be proven, until then I won't make judgement except on the fact that a man who was struggling financially has now become rather wealthy over night.
You know, this is the story that might get us all off the gruesome twosome!
The end credits State: “This program is based on real events: however certain characters, names, incidents, locations, and dialogue have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes.”
Yes! While Fiona may need more protection, Richard showed both Donny and Martha as obsessive and that he wanted Martha to get help.
Well done Piers, it was a good interview 💜
Send from my iPhone 📱
I think it’s disgusting how everyone is
Putting this pressure on someone who is clearly not capable of dealing with it. Laughing about her on talk shows of commercially and ganging up on someone who’s not well. If it was her documentary it would be a different story
Netflix should of not let this one sided show happen
thankyou!
They should have protected Fiona more but it was not one-sided. It is a drama and that creative parts were added was made clear. Richard showed the stupid things he did and how he wanted Martha to get help while he battled to protect himself and develop an obsession at the same time.
Her behaviour is learned. It has to be unlearned and replaced with healthy responses. Its not a typical mental illness. If she doesn't accept she needs help then she will never change.
This woman might hurt herself. People need to put their self in her shoes
@@lulunz6809 She won't ever change. There's nothing that can change her. I knew a woman exactly like her. She was my friend for years. She was a fully functioning human being but an absolute liar. She knew I knew and it didn't stop her. She didn't need pity or treatment, just a friend or two who could accommodate the notion that every word she spoke was a untruth. People come in an amazing array of shades of nuance and behaviour.
Please someone explain to me British Law why nobody on TV or print news have not produced the documents about this lady? Her Univeristy trascripts, mugshots etc
She hasn't Been to jail, it was
Just thrown in to make a series,
Alot of it was embellished BUT she is seriously ill,
I have been a Victim of this type of Person and they will steamroller you and break you down physically, mentally
Apparently she is still harassing other Poor People out there
It's all online
I appreciate that stalking is dangerous, however, there is so much emotion around this yet not much FACT. I would suggest (as someone who hasn't watched the programme), but listened to Fiona Harvey interview completely - everyone on the band wagon needs to be very careful of what they are saying, because there is no evidence of the allegations.
Watch the show! Richard portrays Donny (himself) as an obsessive nut job too and feels sorry for Martha. He doesn't want Fiona to come into harm (not to say he and Netflix shouldn't have done more to protect people)
There is. People have found it easily. Even Netflix have confirmed it especially the emails. They showed him scrolling through him in a short from the programme and confirmed they have seen the emails.
@@lulunz6809 although I take your point, I urge caution until factual hard evidence not presumption is provided - he could've be scrolling through emails from his mum & as for NetFlix let's hope they can prove the existence of 41k emails - a Lawyer is going to have a field day otherwise
Where's her family? Who's protecting her?
Everyone in the industry wanted that interview they know how much it was worth to them personally so there’s a lot of green eyes out in the media There’s an army of them after Piers Morgan
I think piers conducted the interview well, he asked good questions and subtly grilled her on certain points.
Sure, there was enough tidbits in the show that allowed those that are tech savvy to dive into the internet and find her, but ultimately she came forward and identified herself.
Richard made it clear that the programme is about how the stalking and assault affected HIM, the conflicts he felt, the sympathy he had for her whilst also being quite scared of her etc, Martha isn’t the main character, it’s not about her.
Also Netflix and their lawyers will have gone over the scripts and the evidence provided by Richard that showed ll the messages, emails and letters. (It was the actual messages she sent that are in the programme. ). If they thought that she could be identified purely from incidents shown in the programme they would have addressed and changed parts of the script.
At the beginning of the series netflix say it’s a true story, I took that to mean that it was a true depiction of how the stalking, assaults and shaky career beginnings affected him and his life, the psychological impact on him so the speak. The character Martha is a dramatised depiction of the stalkers behaviour toward him.
I don’t agree with her being harassed and given death threats (if that’s true). I think that’s totally uncalled for but I believe she has made her situation worse by doing the piers interview and blatantly lying and contradicting herself. It will certainly reduce any empathy and sympathy the public may have felt for her.
She’s very clever Piers has interviewed many people from all backgrounds but there will come an explosive interview Piers is taking his time why rush the process. Milk it for what it is he let her get her say but remember there’s facts and truth out there wmmay that be emails voice notes etc… it’s all out there to be proved simple
She's scary
Agree - the way she says “mmmmmmmh”
The great news Piers has a thick skin he simply won’t care what people will think. 8.7M now but who’s counting 🤣
She must be pretty confident if she is taking him and Netflix to court?
Or deluded!
Is she taking him and Netflix to court?
It would have been a better idea for Netflix to say that it was 'based on a real events' or say nothing at all. Why would you risk litigation like this? What were there lawyers thinking?
IMO, both Gadd and Harvey deserve each other.
Anyone fooled by Fiona Harvey isn't necessarily dumb. She's very clever and gives a good performance, and her 'good' persona would fool anyone at first hearing, or some of it anyway, but don't be taken in by it. Piers Morgan was exceptionally easy on her, and to an extent he got gulled by her himself. She's sincerely insincere if you understand my meaning. But she's seeking attention again, and is disgusted that Gadd and Netflix have a massive hit on their hands and is jealous of Gadd's paycheck. When she threatens to sue, it's that which is driving her, but she's too smart to do it. Having a legal background, no matter how inflated she's made it, she knows a good lawyer is going to tear her story to shreds in five minutes flat. Yes she stalked him. Gadd's no angel either and comes across as insincerely insincere! He sounds weak and pathetic at interview by comparison with her forceful lies. But if Fiona can only 'doubt' that Gadd has that many messages etc., why? She'd know and say for certain 'absolutely not', had she not been guilty of sending them.
gadd encouraged her all the way. he wants money and fame but how come no one points the finger at the rapist in the drama ?
because they have yet to find him. If people knew the real rapist, we'd def be hearing a lot more about that. Unfortunately, no one has found him yet and non of richards friends is willing to tell us who it was.
Gadd knows who the rapist is so why not pursue that- because he’s full of BS.
Pier’s was FANTASTIC!
I am not sure why any British paper, or British news have not produced the police documents or her mugshot after being charged. I know she used the Fiona Muir back when all this was going on.
Uncomfortable and compelling sums it up . I’m pretty sure Netflix checked everything through their lawyers so I don’t think she stands a chance of winning any money 💰
Before I saw Baby Reindeer ,the headlines about it made me think it was going to be a stalker/ Misery type thing, but as the episodes went on and especially when the Darien backstory was shown, it made the current Martha situation small fry in comparison. Blocking emails and even finding another pub job could've solved a lot of the issues pretty quickly. Martha's presence seemed more like a distractor from the Donny's *true* source of anguish, the one he had kept to himself (until the public announcement of it on stage)
Not funny when you're stalked. Playing with fire
Exactly. Its very dangerous and we know famous people who have been killed by stalkers. This is mindblowing.
is it worth sticking "based on a true story" onto a production if the debate around it eclipses the production? If I had any perfectionism about me as an artist, I'd definitely hate that aspect of what is going on here. I think lots of people, like me, are tuning into the debate rather than bothering to watch the Netflix show.
Green spot on his face? WTF?
I think Piers Morgan let her off with murder. He didn't go after her in the way he's well known for. She contradicted herself continually making her version of the facts simply unbelievable. He could have torn her to shreds. Piers was a puppy dog with her. I can't believe he's under criticism!!!!
What he did was dangerous. Stalkers have been known to murder people. She has a significant problem and could target a person who would not cope with it as well as the people who we know of, have.
Look up alex bellfield, go 5 and a half years for less emails etc.
OMGoodness this is all gone to far and should never been allowed whether true or not also I thought the program was very distasteful , yuk .
Kev, it's sooo good to have you back in the evenings! ❤
She is a lawyer. She has a law degree. That is shown in the show. She had a breakdown later after getting a law degree and didn't recover
'She doesnt sound mad' just shows ignorant sterotypes and preconceptions and mistunderstanding around what mental illness looks and sounds like
Well I think its important not to lump all mental health issues into one basket. There are many different types that are treated differently. The type of disorder this woman has is not an illness as such. Its a learned response to trauma. Also many are on a spectrum e.g. depression can be mild or severe and look very different in someone's life. This lady has a severe personality disorder which can only be treated by behaviour modification and therapy. She doesn't want the help.
Whatever 'degree' she has. it is not from the Univerisity of Aberdeen as stated by her. Another lie. They have no record of her Fiona harvey or under Fiona Muir her previous name , in any database check/ student records/ alumni for the years she was supposedly there studying. A group of Alumni have checked thoroughly , not in law or any other course.
I do not believe for one moment he asked her to sleep with him ! I can’t believe people are sticking up for this crazy woman !! She contracted herself throughout the interview .
Bro shut up and stop interrupting your guests. The dude in the punk show was telling a fascinating story and you keep cutting him off. It’s very obnoxious
Dam is this stuff tv
I AM FIFI''S BOYFRIEND
SHE DOES NOT LIE