I agree. I went on a J.K Rowling interview spree on CZcams, as one do every once in a while... and I'm amazed that this clip was so hard to track down.
She literally created a whole universe out of nothing. She’s an absolute genius. Such an incredible series of books. When I read them I get lost in them. All of my HP books had missing spines and creased and folded page corners from reading them so much. God I love the HP world.
No, she's drawing heavily from real-life folk magic, Roman religion, esoteric beliefs and to some extent Christianity. It's "appropriate" that she sits under a tree writing, because ancient druids believed, as wiccans do today, that you can get to know a tree and then ask it to donate wood for your wand. This is not all her creation, the themes are older and date back at least as far as The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. You may remember the golden break of dawn over the Great Hall as Harry finally beats Voldemort in DH?
mugglesarecooltoo Name a book (especially fantasy) that doesn’t borrow from pre-existing myths, legends or ideas. Everything is interconnected. Even religions borrow their creation myths from earlier religions. That’s the beauty of storytelling; it builds upon itself.
Man how I wish she read the whole book. I could listen to J.k read for hours, and the accent makes everything 100 times better. I wonder how she feels, reading her own creation, knowing how much joy it brought to so many people.
@Sparsh Dhir Yep, the animagus potion/charm is considered extremely advanced transfiguration. "It takes skill, practise, and patience for wizards and witches to become Animagi. The process of becoming an Animagus is long and arduous, and has the potential to backfire and cause the transformation to go horribly wrong. Many witches and wizards simply feel that their time might better be employed in other ways, as the skill is of limited practical use unless one has a great need of disguise or concealment."
Wow - she read that so well, truly knows her world and characters like the back of her hand. Her pronunciation of Rubeus was surprising, and her accent for him was just spot on! Steven Fry did an excellent take on the stories, but I wish JK Rowling would release an audiobook of her reading each of the seven books! My one question however: If Hagrid got expelled and thus never learned to apparate - how did he disappear so quickly at the end of the passage?
This is the art of wizards and witches. They dissappear quickly. I do not think this means they always disapparate. Doesn't it make a noise when they do disapparate?
It is so special to hear her read and I could listen to it for ages. But I can't say that I prefer it over my German audiobook or in fact the English versions. Rufus Beck is just fantastic and it is in my head and my heart since my childhood. But as I said, hearing her read is just so special.
J. k. Rowling. We love you! And very sorry people are so nasty towards you. Please know there are many who cherish who you and thankful for you contributions to the world.
at the same, she is being nasty towards other (very vulnerable) people, im not saying she deserves the public hate and bullying (although she certainly deserves criticism), but you cant deny the hurt she has caused
@@JustinGarfield1 oh, okay, i see. i do want to say that: a. i might forget something b. im not trans, just an ally c. i haven't read her essay nor her twits (i dont have twitter), ive only watched videos about it, but im pretty sure they are reliable since they provided screenshots etc, but i feel it is important to mention. d. since the comment is so long (im very sorry for that, but you didnt want the video) i will put the thing itself that Rowling did %in a dollar sign% and the rest would be why its problematic and my opinions (since you said you want to know them). okay, so: 1. %she liked a transphobic tweet that calls transwomen "men in dresses".% (i dont have an evidence of that, so im not 100% that that happened) although this on its own wouldnt mean she is transphobic (it was only a like), it adds to the rest and supports the case for her transphobia 2.1. %she supports maya forstater (a very transphobic person). but not only that, in the tweet she makes it seem as though maya was only "stating that sex is real"% ("real sex" obviously isnt the problem, since trans people agree with that too), and made maya seem better and trans people seem worse by making them look hysterical and dumb (as though tras people are having a problem with stating that sex is real) but also semi-dangerous (because maya was "forced out of her job). 2.2. %also, in the same tweet it was pretty implied that trans people arent really the gender they are but only pretending to be it ("dress however you please, call yourself whatever youd like"),% now, its pretty subtle and wouldnt be problematic on its own, but its important to keep in mind the context. 3. %she had a problem with the term "people who menstruate"% which is the best term (it soesnt include woman who dont menstruate: menapause, fertility issues, itersex, trans. and does include trans men an non-binary people who menstruate but arent women). having a problem with the term implies that you might not see trans women as women and trans men as men (otherwise, my reasoning above would apply). 4.%she made a tweet saying that sex is real,% which is absolutely fine outside of the context. the problem is, it was framed as a view opposing to the "trans ideology" (for a luck of a better word), it is a big strawmen and ive already explained the problems with that in number 2. 5. she wrote a tweet in which she said about trans people "if you were discriminated against" which is ignorant and spreading misleading and harmful to trans people misinformation (that trans people arent discriminated against). 6. %she followed magdalen berns% (i dont have an evidence of that, so im not 100% that that happened), which is a minor issue, but with everything else we know about Rowling now, it is pretty indicative of her view about trans people, and also probably popularized and legitimized magdalen. 7. %her essay:% 7.1. %she was against letting trans women into women spaces% (im not sure what are my views about the topic, but i am leaning towards the transwomens side) 7.2. %making it seem that there are a lot of detransitioners,% which isnt true and misleading and delegitimizes things that trans people fight for (like hormone blockers for trans youth) (im not saying that being a detransitioner isnt valid, it is). 7.3. there are more problems with the essay, but they are relatively minor and the comment is already very long. generally she said misleading stuff, wrong stuff and stuff that implied transphobic things. also, i myself havent read the essay, but im sure there are minor problems with it which im not aware of. %so, in conclusion: taken separately, what Rowling said isnt that bad, but together in context we can see a picture of somebody with homophobic view. if Rowling were a regulars person, i would have said "oh, she is mildly transphobic and bigoted", but as a person with such a platform and such an influence, she is responsible for A LOT of misinformation and misleading information that will hurt trans people, for legitimization of very transphobic people and contributed to a misinformed harmful strawmen view of trans people and probably legitimized it to some degree.% %also important to note how much pain she caused to trans people who were fans of her book,% now, i cant speak about that (im not trans) but if you want, i have links to videos where trans people speak about it.
Started my harry potter at 9 years old when not even the first movie was made yet That was 24 years ago. Harry Potter will always hold a special place in my book collection
JK Rowling is a genius! I love the Harry Potter series and will love them till the end of days. The way Rowling reads the passage makes me want to just close my eyes and imagine what’s going on.
it doesnt mean anything. i dont know whether women are underappreciated or not, but the fact that one woman was appreciated (btw, USING A NON-WOMAN PSEUDONIM) doesnt say anything
@@amanekabbaj You'd think she wouldn't have let the movies ruin some aspects of the books by changing them for no reason. Don't get me wrong, I love the movies as much as the books, but why call it "Sorcerer's Stone" instead of "Philosopher's Stone"? Why ommit Mr. Binns, Peeves, Winky, and so on? Why have Polyjuice potion not change one's voice? And so on... Why so many unnecessary changes? The movies did a fair bit of things better, though, like the end of Philosopher's Stone.
okay the fact she wrote that under a tree in a park was irrelevant even though she said "you'll understand why it's appropriate when I've read a little more" but oh well her voice is soothing so idm
She's non-stop talking about the types of wood the wands are made off. It's a bit of a far fetched reference, but apparently the location inspired her.
@@calvinmusquez9162 Yeah, I mean I know she's reading from an American version, but I would've thought she would have still said "Philosopher's." If I get rich enough then I'll go and digitally remaster the whole HP franchise; like making Harry's eyes green, giving Harry his scar wgen it's not there and it should be, changing "Sorcerer's" to "Philosopher's." Or changing anything the doesn't make sense like when in Chamber of Secrets and Hermione uses _Finite Incantatem_ on a bludger *and it explodes.* I'd add back some of the good deleted scenes too. Edit (a year later): Wow if I could remaster them, I'd do so much more. With modern technology, you could reshoot scenes and add them seamlessly. There's so much to add from the books, and there's so much consistency to add to the series. I'd get John Williams to recompose for the whole thing, keeping the other 3 composers' best leitmotifs but keeping Williams's alive. Of course this'll never happen, and there's no way it would be worth the money or time, but holy shit I'd love for it to happen, even if that'd mean that the movies were 3 and a half hours long each.
Luca-Sebastien Barret it’s not a matter of being rich. You can do those things with off the shelf editing software. In fact I’ve been doing something very similar in my free time for some time now.
@@calvinmusquez9162 Yeah, since I can make music and stuff, I'll try my best to reanimate my envisioned remaster of the films (read the edit in my last reply). I guess I could hire voice actors and stuff, just to recreate new scenes or the ones where I have to separate the audio. Because I'd keep most scenes from the original films in, but with edits, meaning I'd of course have to reanimate them and all. Just as an example of what I'd want the films to be like, since there's so much stuff to add from the books. One day.
Was this before her, erm... comments? Still, as a writer she's on some crazily high level. She made such an amazing, unique, and almost complete world that no one else could have dreamt of dreaming of! As well as such trauma before that. I don't like her opinions on a very important subjects, but I separate the utter genius of the Harry Potter world from that.
She is doing what she is doing best - acting. A real author would never be doing such things as reading "the favourite part". The project must go on ;-)
@@r.fdraws4138 Transphobic? She was defending the safety, rights and identity of women and speaking against female erasure. Get out of here with your misogyny.
I've uploaded a fixed version of this, in HD quality and without the 11 second glitch in the middle!
Please watch this instead: bit.ly/JKReadsFixed
I wish she would make the audiobooks. I love hearing her read it, there is something very special about it.
I agree. I went on a J.K Rowling interview spree on CZcams, as one do every once in a while...
and I'm amazed that this clip was so hard to track down.
Oh hello. Mum from blasé Wirtz
Michael Laporte she's even better than Jim Dale who I thought was a perfect reader. So what does that say?
Michael Laporte vjjju
Honestly i feel like she ruins it. It's very lackluster at times.
She literally created a whole universe out of nothing. She’s an absolute genius. Such an incredible series of books. When I read them I get lost in them. All of my HP books had missing spines and creased and folded page corners from reading them so much. God I love the HP world.
No, she's drawing heavily from real-life folk magic, Roman religion, esoteric beliefs and to some extent Christianity. It's "appropriate" that she sits under a tree writing, because ancient druids believed, as wiccans do today, that you can get to know a tree and then ask it to donate wood for your wand.
This is not all her creation, the themes are older and date back at least as far as The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. You may remember the golden break of dawn over the Great Hall as Harry finally beats Voldemort in DH?
@Sophia Chen Sure, but my point is that it wasn't all made up, there's a skeletal structure of religion fleshed out with fantasy.
mugglesarecooltoo Name a book (especially fantasy) that doesn’t borrow from pre-existing myths, legends or ideas. Everything is interconnected. Even religions borrow their creation myths from earlier religions. That’s the beauty of storytelling; it builds upon itself.
@@mugglesarecooltoo muggle
mugglesarecooltoo she wrote the first few chapters on a damn napkin on a train and you still can’t give her credit? 🤦🏽♂️
The way she pronounced Rubeus... MIND BLOWN!
If she did the audio books herself, there's another billion dollars right there.
Which episode she read about
Lol but she's already rich enough to care about.
Please take my money!
@@tayluvofficial She donates tons of money to charity. Why not.
@@mikac.8643 that's great.
anyone else close their eyes when she reads and just imagine the scene taking place
Everybody imagines it but I doubt anyone would close their eyes
@@achyuththouta6957 I did
I definitely close my eyes through the whole thing & saw everything in detail 👍
Will R I OMG mee to... i even close my eyes when Reading it
No, i have to read the subtitles too
She's a legend
Ageed
Agreed
not really she is just a Transphobic person
Cult update sadly. That’s why you separate the art from the artist
Really JK Rowling could’ve been so amazing if she wasn’t transphobic. It all makes me so sad :(
Imagine knowing that in a thousand years, people will still know your name and still read your work. Fking legend.
People won't exist on earth in 1000 years, stupid fuck!
I could listen to her read all day she's honestly a genius
Same
Man how I wish she read the whole book. I could listen to J.k read for hours, and the accent makes everything 100 times better. I wonder how she feels, reading her own creation, knowing how much joy it brought to so many people.
The fact that James's wand was "excellent for Transfiguration" always makes me chuckle.
@Sparsh Dhir Yep, the animagus potion/charm is considered extremely advanced transfiguration. "It takes skill, practise, and patience for wizards and witches to become Animagi. The process of becoming an Animagus is long and arduous, and has the potential to backfire and cause the transformation to go horribly wrong. Many witches and wizards simply feel that their time might better be employed in other ways, as the skill is of limited practical use unless one has a great need of disguise or concealment."
She clearly forshadowed it.
Wow - she read that so well, truly knows her world and characters like the back of her hand. Her pronunciation of Rubeus was surprising, and her accent for him was just spot on! Steven Fry did an excellent take on the stories, but I wish JK Rowling would release an audiobook of her reading each of the seven books!
My one question however: If Hagrid got expelled and thus never learned to apparate - how did he disappear so quickly at the end of the passage?
Who's to say Dumbledore didn't teach him in secret
This is the art of wizards and witches. They dissappear quickly. I do not think this means they always disapparate. Doesn't it make a noise when they do disapparate?
I like Jim Dale's version the best.
The interviewer must be so pissed off - he didn't get to ask her any questions for almost 10 minutes!!
Ollie Wiggins haha I thought the same thing.
J. K reading to u personally is worth that 10 min
Jermaine Treshawn Brown Yes, for fans. But this guy just wanted an interview.
What a pleasure it is to listen to JK Rowling reading one of her books...
Rowling speaks Ollivander's lines so distinctively as if she had John Hurt in mind for the role.
Wouldn't surprise me. She had Robbie Coltrane in mind for Hagrid when she wrote the books
@@RabidNemoAnd Alan Rickman for Snape.
Wow love Joanne doing Hagrid's accent! :)
A bit more slowly and quietly and this would be an amazing ASMR.
God, I love that.
Fuck that shit
I smiled like a fool throughout the whole video, this made me so happy!
Omg same
If only now we could listen to recordings of the entire series, as told by JKR.
Oh gosh, I am so excited to find this. Her reading is fabulous, amazing, I lost words.
I love hearing JKR reading her work.
Same
I hope she made an audio book
God reading the Bible.
No, cuz God didn't write The Bible.
Num diga...
exactly
THIS WAS MY FAVORITE PASSAGE AS WELL!
It is so special to hear her read and I could listen to it for ages.
But I can't say that I prefer it over my German audiobook or in fact the English versions. Rufus Beck is just fantastic and it is in my head and my heart since my childhood.
But as I said, hearing her read is just so special.
Imagine Alan rickman with a voice like his reading parts from hp books ....😔....rip Alan
Now you made me cry 💔
man😢
J. k. Rowling. We love you! And very sorry people are so nasty towards you. Please know there are many who cherish who you and thankful for you contributions to the world.
at the same, she is being nasty towards other (very vulnerable) people, im not saying she deserves the public hate and bullying (although she certainly deserves criticism), but you cant deny the hurt she has caused
@@justsomerandomname2067 please tell me what she exactly did.
@@JustinGarfield1 if you dont know and curious, would you be interested in a link to a video that explains what she did and why it was problematic?
@@justsomerandomname2067 can you explain in your own words? I want to see your views tied to what she said.
@@JustinGarfield1 oh, okay, i see. i do want to say that:
a. i might forget something
b. im not trans, just an ally
c. i haven't read her essay nor her twits (i dont have twitter), ive only watched videos about it, but im pretty sure they are reliable since they provided screenshots etc, but i feel it is important to mention.
d. since the comment is so long (im very sorry for that, but you didnt want the video) i will put the thing itself that Rowling did %in a dollar sign% and the rest would be why its problematic and my opinions (since you said you want to know them).
okay, so:
1. %she liked a transphobic tweet that calls transwomen "men in dresses".% (i dont have an evidence of that, so im not 100% that that happened) although this on its own wouldnt mean she is transphobic (it was only a like), it adds to the rest and supports the case for her transphobia
2.1. %she supports maya forstater (a very transphobic person). but not only that, in the tweet she makes it seem as though maya was only "stating that sex is real"% ("real sex" obviously isnt the problem, since trans people agree with that too), and made maya seem better and trans people seem worse by making them look hysterical and dumb (as though tras people are having a problem with stating that sex is real) but also semi-dangerous (because maya was "forced out of her job).
2.2. %also, in the same tweet it was pretty implied that trans people arent really the gender they are but only pretending to be it ("dress however you please, call yourself whatever youd like"),% now, its pretty subtle and wouldnt be problematic on its own, but its important to keep in mind the context.
3. %she had a problem with the term "people who menstruate"% which is the best term (it soesnt include woman who dont menstruate: menapause, fertility issues, itersex, trans. and does include trans men an non-binary people who menstruate but arent women). having a problem with the term implies that you might not see trans women as women and trans men as men (otherwise, my reasoning above would apply).
4.%she made a tweet saying that sex is real,% which is absolutely fine outside of the context. the problem is, it was framed as a view opposing to the "trans ideology" (for a luck of a better word), it is a big strawmen and ive already explained the problems with that in number 2.
5. she wrote a tweet in which she said about trans people "if you were discriminated against" which is ignorant and spreading misleading and harmful to trans people misinformation (that trans people arent discriminated against).
6. %she followed magdalen berns% (i dont have an evidence of that, so im not 100% that that happened), which is a minor issue, but with everything else we know about Rowling now, it is pretty indicative of her view about trans people, and also probably popularized and legitimized magdalen.
7. %her essay:%
7.1. %she was against letting trans women into women spaces% (im not sure what are my views about the topic, but i am leaning towards the transwomens side)
7.2. %making it seem that there are a lot of detransitioners,% which isnt true and misleading and delegitimizes things that trans people fight for (like hormone blockers for trans youth) (im not saying that being a detransitioner isnt valid, it is).
7.3. there are more problems with the essay, but they are relatively minor and the comment is already very long. generally she said misleading stuff, wrong stuff and stuff that implied transphobic things. also, i myself havent read the essay, but im sure there are minor problems with it which im not aware of.
%so, in conclusion: taken separately, what Rowling said isnt that bad, but together in context we can see a picture of somebody with homophobic view. if Rowling were a regulars person, i would have said "oh, she is mildly transphobic and bigoted", but as a person with such a platform and such an influence, she is responsible for A LOT of misinformation and misleading information that will hurt trans people, for legitimization of very transphobic people and contributed to a misinformed harmful strawmen view of trans people and probably legitimized it to some degree.%
%also important to note how much pain she caused to trans people who were fans of her book,% now, i cant speak about that (im not trans) but if you want, i have links to videos where trans people speak about it.
I love hearing her read!
Started my harry potter at 9 years old when not even the first movie was made yet
That was 24 years ago.
Harry Potter will always hold a special place in my book collection
So magical ✨ it makes me feel at home
She really love this passage
JK Rowling is a genius! I love the Harry Potter series and will love them till the end of days. The way Rowling reads the passage makes me want to just close my eyes and imagine what’s going on.
Love seeing her reading it.
She could read the dictionary and I'd be mesmerized
Did the interviewer seem bored/annoyed to anyone else?
I saw him smiling and nodding in a couple of parts in the video. He looked interested to me
so so powerful. made me tear up :'')
It meant so much to me, as I am her biggest fan. I also wanna be an author just like j.k.rowling
Amazing Joanne! :D
So charming just closed my eyes and enjoyed throughout the video..
It's sooooooooooooooooooooooo soothing.
That lovely smile at the end. :)
So relaxing
I wish I could have the whole series read by her.
Beautiful and lyrical
thank you joanna
It's so perfect...
Anyone getting the chills all throughout the video?
And they say women are under appreciated in our society...Harry Potter is one of the greatest stories of all time.
No.
it doesnt mean anything. i dont know whether women are underappreciated or not, but the fact that one woman was appreciated (btw, USING A NON-WOMAN PSEUDONIM) doesnt say anything
omg make the audiobooks😍
She created a whole new world with a deep detail about it she is a legend
Hearing her say Rubeus, is strange. I've never heard it pronounced that way.
Elaina Gilbert xctly what I thought
You’d think she would have told Jim Dale and Sephan Fry how to pronounce it.
As well as all of the directors of the movies who also don't pronounce Voldemort correctly.
@@amanekabbaj You'd think she wouldn't have let the movies ruin some aspects of the books by changing them for no reason. Don't get me wrong, I love the movies as much as the books, but why call it "Sorcerer's Stone" instead of "Philosopher's Stone"? Why ommit Mr. Binns, Peeves, Winky, and so on? Why have Polyjuice potion not change one's voice? And so on... Why so many unnecessary changes? The movies did a fair bit of things better, though, like the end of Philosopher's Stone.
Could be the way Ollivander specifically pronounces Rubeus?
Nobody reads it better than her😌
Her voice is soo... Warm and lovely if you know how I mean it. I like her voice. ☺️
It's a shame shes fallen so far into insanity with her transphobia. A shame that such a talented and once amazing woman has turned into a monster...
@@funwithakthechannelwherean4510 A monster lol
She is an absolute genius!
her reading hp is gold😭
She has done amazing.
Why is noone talking about the way she pronounced 'Rubeus' 😂😂😂😂
Since she is the writer that would mean however she says it is correct.
it‘s HER book, so however she pronounces his name, it‘s right🤗
@Swiss_Girl 4 years too late but thanks
Her West Country accent for Hagrid is great!
Don’t need to wait further than the third word to know why it’s appropriate
I like because I can put my daughter to sleep finally
Harry Potter is favourite movie
Read the books
She legit sounded like Daniel Radcliff and Robbie Coltrane when imitating Harry and Hagrid!
Wow I like reading Harry Potter but this makes me want to read it.
Legend
I'VE BEEN SAYING HAGRIDS NAME WRONG THIS WHOLE TIME!!!
Thanks Rowling for created Harry Potter
Magic!
Where can I get a good Female voice Audiobook that is soothing to hear??
I am curious too.
YO YO YO who else Is here from school to do a class read In quarantine
I feel that the only flaw with Harry potter series is that voldemort always waits till the end of the year to kill Harry...
...like Ben Willis trying to kill Julie in I Know What You Did Last Summer.
Deathly hallows part 1 at first ,tried kill😂
Believe me there are many! After reading them for 20 years, I can probably write an essay with all of them! lol Still love them, however.
okay the fact she wrote that under a tree in a park was irrelevant even though she said "you'll understand why it's appropriate when I've read a little more" but oh well her voice is soothing so idm
She's non-stop talking about the types of wood the wands are made off. It's a bit of a far fetched reference, but apparently the location inspired her.
I think it's bc it was talking about wand wood.
Me geeking out because I know (basically) everything about Harry Potter.
Thanks from Russia for you Harry,Iike your heroes,very much,you amazing.
You myself kind wisard,clever and beatiful.I adore your books!!!
Thank you thank you for everything Jk
someone tell me the page please
Love Rowling.
Hear we hear the voice of the imagination!
Now we all know how to pronounce hagrid’s first name. Love you JK. Hearing the real Hagrid voice is great
Did you guys hear of the "Hussle to peace campaign"
Wait she says "Sorcerer's Stone" instead of "Philosopher's Stone"?
Luca-Sebastien Barret American interview and she’s reading from an American edition. Otherwise she 100% would have said “Philosopher’s”.
@@calvinmusquez9162 Yeah, I mean I know she's reading from an American version, but I would've thought she would have still said "Philosopher's." If I get rich enough then I'll go and digitally remaster the whole HP franchise; like making Harry's eyes green, giving Harry his scar wgen it's not there and it should be, changing "Sorcerer's" to "Philosopher's." Or changing anything the doesn't make sense like when in Chamber of Secrets and Hermione uses _Finite Incantatem_ on a bludger *and it explodes.* I'd add back some of the good deleted scenes too.
Edit (a year later): Wow if I could remaster them, I'd do so much more. With modern technology, you could reshoot scenes and add them seamlessly. There's so much to add from the books, and there's so much consistency to add to the series. I'd get John Williams to recompose for the whole thing, keeping the other 3 composers' best leitmotifs but keeping Williams's alive. Of course this'll never happen, and there's no way it would be worth the money or time, but holy shit I'd love for it to happen, even if that'd mean that the movies were 3 and a half hours long each.
Luca-Sebastien Barret it’s not a matter of being rich. You can do those things with off the shelf editing software. In fact I’ve been doing something very similar in my free time for some time now.
It’s the American version
@@calvinmusquez9162 Yeah, since I can make music and stuff, I'll try my best to reanimate my envisioned remaster of the films (read the edit in my last reply). I guess I could hire voice actors and stuff, just to recreate new scenes or the ones where I have to separate the audio. Because I'd keep most scenes from the original films in, but with edits, meaning I'd of course have to reanimate them and all. Just as an example of what I'd want the films to be like, since there's so much stuff to add from the books.
One day.
Rue-BAE-us... It's been years
What happened to the video skipping the best part!
I know, right? I uploaded a fixed version about a year ago! It's in the pinned comment on this video :)
@@Saandy_ oh thank you!
U kidding me?! When I read my fav passages I’m bouncing up and down in my seat and yelling about how awesome it is
What the hell are you on about?
MrParkerman6 I honestly don’t know what I was thinking, it was 3 months ago.
5:58
She is a fantastic writer. I have some of her quotes. You can get it from it. topmotivationalquotess.com/j-k-rowling-quotes-reading-writing/
i realy dont like the harry pot but i have to read it for school
hehe Harry POT
It’s not bad. You just got to get into it. It gets really good as the books go on
*Harry Pothead and The Stoner's Bud.
Was this before her, erm... comments?
Still, as a writer she's on some crazily high level. She made such an amazing, unique, and almost complete world that no one else could have dreamt of dreaming of! As well as such trauma before that. I don't like her opinions on a very important subjects, but I separate the utter genius of the Harry Potter world from that.
She called it.. sorcerers stone...
American version only. It was thought by the publisher that Americans might not understand "Philosopher's Stone".
Thats the american version
American version
Yea...
@fleetstreet11
Which makes no damn sense, since us American's know very well what a Philosopher is.
Wait.. did she say sorcerer's stone?
It’s the other name, in America
She is doing what she is doing best - acting. A real author would never be doing such things as reading "the favourite part". The project must go on ;-)
Why do u mean by that
Hate her all you want but she gave us the gift of Harry fuckin Potter
We sperate the art from the artist shes a transphobic racist person
i think thats where the dissonance comes from (for a lot of people)
It pains me to hear her say sorcerer's stone
Why. It’s just the other name
I found out now it's called Ru bea us not Ru bee us😱
Bea and Bee are pronounced the same way, dummy.
it pronounce the same
The poor interviewer looks bored out of his mind.
Right?! And those insincere smiles randomly when camera pans to him
The Male interviewer is so insincere
wish she was an advocate for trans rights
She's an advocate for women's rights.
Why did she have to say those things? Just why?
I know right!
What things?
Transphobic crap that was low-key high-key offensive
Ikr. It’s sad. That’s why you gotta separate the art from the artist
@@r.fdraws4138 Transphobic? She was defending the safety, rights and identity of women and speaking against female erasure. Get out of here with your misogyny.
You will fail!
WAIT. Who the FUCK is RU-BAY-US. His name is RUBIUS. The fuck.