Will Gaming on the FASTEST SSD Boost Performance? MSI Spatium M580 Gen 5 NVME Review 14600MB/s!!
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 04. 2024
- For this video, we dive deep into the world of NVME SSDs with MSI's latest Spatium M580 Gen 5 NVME SSD. With speeds soaring up to a mind-blowing 14.6GB/s, we explore whether gaming on the fastest SSD truly impacts performance. Join us as we dissect the specifications, design, and thermal performance of the Spatium M580, comparing it against a high-end Gen 4 drive. From synthetic benchmarks to real-world gaming tests, we uncover the truth behind NVME SSDs and gaming performance. Will this speed demon revolutionize your gaming experience? Find out in this comprehensive review! Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more tech reviews and gaming insights!
Check out the MSI Spatium M580 Here:
www.msi.com/Storage/SPATIUM-M...
TEST SPECS
CPU: Intel Core i9-13900K 5.7GHz Pcores, 4.6GHz Ecores, 5.0GHz RING
CPU Cooler: MSI MAG Coreliquid E360
RAM: Teamgroup T-creat 32GB(2x16GB) 7200CL34 tuned timings
Motherboard: MSI Z790 Carbon Wifi
SSD: Corsair MP600 PRO 4TB
GPU: MSI RTX 4090 Gaming X Trio 3GHz cores, 24gbps memory OC
PSU: EVGA 1000G3
Use my affiliate links to purchase parts and support the channel! amzn.to/3IAAzAG
Intel 14th gen CPUs here: amzn.to/40Vt4g1
Ryzen 7 7800X3D here: amzn.to/3VfW5lW
RTX 4070 Super: amzn.to/3v04dwo
RTX 4080 Super HERE! amzn.to/49av5Zg
BUY A 5700X3D HERE: amzn.to/3w1nAoI
BUY A 12600KF HERE: amzn.to/3HRMlGI
ROG Apex Z790 Encore here: amzn.to/49jqeon
Check out my 13900K Hyperthreading 40 Game Benchmark Vid
• Is Hyper-Threading Use...
Watch my 13700K E Core ON vs OFF 40 Game Benchmark video
• I Did Not Expect These...
Watch my RTX 4090 vs 3090 42 Game Benchmark video
• RTX 4090 vs RTX 3090 M...
Watch my RTX 4090 at 2GHz video
• If Nvidia Didn't Incre...
Buy an RX 7800XT Here:
amzn.to/3EuQYoh
Support the channel by donating!
**** www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted... ****
Want to build a Gaming PC? Use my Amazon Affiliate link below!
United States - amzn.to/2JKq8uW
Canada - amzn.to/2GYSkbM
United Kingdom - amzn.to/2qupqda
Follow me on Twitter
/ dannyzreviews
#PCGaming #Benchmarks #MSISpatium #GPUs - Věda a technologie
Final Opinion: Measurably faster, but not noticeably faster.
I recently got the Crucial T705, it's fast but l don't notice enough difference from a Gen4 drive to recommend it because of the cost. I use the Thermalright HR10 2280 PRO Black SSD Cooler with it, works great and stay cool.
Looks more like my Grand Father's Crypt Locker than an ultra fast nvme SSD
That's a frickin CPU cooler heatsink xd Pretty much never noticed a difference while loading/installing stuff going from SATA SSD to M.2 however HDD to SATA SSD oh boi. Average user doesn't need anything faster really but M.2 is handy when you are moving bunch of movies or something. Awsum video informative
Awesome work, very professional and super clean camera work. What camera do you use?
Thanks appreciate it, I use a Nikon Z50
@@DannyzReviews Cheers
Quick answer for Gaming: no
It is a matter of how the developer coded and mapped the file . And how chunks of files are loaded from SSD to CPU to RAM to GPU.
If anything, PCIe Gen 3 NVMe SSD can still win against PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD if the game is utilizing Microsoft Direct Storage API running from NVMe Gen3, compared to a game that's not using Direct Storage API at all running from NVMe Gen5.
Basically Microsoft Direct Storage allows Graphics Card skipping direction of File request from CPU and RAM to access SSD directly.
I get much better speeds using a portion of system RAM as drive cache. I allocate 2-4GB of DDR4 3200Mhz RAM for the cache and I get 20GBs even on external HDD. I use Romex software to create and manage the cache. Its really great on the portable drives but to be honest on my 4X4 7300MBs m.2 drives its hard to notice a difference. Cool vid.
Based on your experience, it is a waste of RAM because when you run the benchmark, it shows RAM transfer speed. The HDD will still be a huge bottleneck, so it's more cost-effective to get a 16 Gb Intel Optane or a 64 Gb SSD and use it as a cache for the HDD and leave the RAM for more important tasks.
That's because the onboard cache is only for improving write speeds so it won't load anything faster. Without cache nand ssds have about 10x slower write speeds than read speeds.
Just the size of the heatsink, no I don´t want gen5 NVMe unless you´re doing tonns of writing and reading from the NVMe even gen4 isn´t really worth it over gen3 NVMe´s. And regarding gaming performance? You missed something which also relates to installation speeds where the faster NVMe could benefit even more in certain tasks: CPU cache which also matters for zip/unzip pretty much every game is using. You download e.g 125GB but after install the game is almost 190GB, maybe because you´re unpacking a bunch of heavily compressed files? But there obiously is a balance bewteen IPC and Cache mattering for compression: huge cache doesn´t help when the CPU is too slow, you need the horsepower to actually utualize Cache.
The diminishing or very small increase in gaming and load time performance between different gens of nvme drives was already documented.
Anyway its important to recheck it with latest and greatest one and productivity users can definitely profit from getting this one.
Although they can run some kind of RAID and use of 2 or 4 of these could bring some physical installation problems.
But that heatsink is ridiculous, I can't imagine nvme 6.0 one 😅. Get ready for jet fighter blower fan.
Already nvme 4.0 were getting hot. Mine 3.0 one is surprisingly hotter under mainboard nvme heatsink probably thanks to being placed between gpu and cpu. Another one 250G same model without heatsink but below gpu is few degree C cooler.
👉 I am curious how are Windows boot times affected.
Mine WD Blue nvme 3.0 500GB does good job with i3-10100f boots in 6,4s (optimized, untra fast boot in BIOS, no login).
Btw I am suspicious that mainly that 4K random read and write performance does main job when it comes to overall performance.
Ads be like: Introducing our NVME 4x6.0, it comes with his own 240mm or 360mm radiator.
Thermalright: Introducing our new Peerless Assassin 120 NVMe Edition dual tower cooler for your SSD.
I went from 30 second boots to 20 second boots upgrading from the wd sn850x (premium gen 4 ssd) to the optane p1600x. Ofc optanes are in a league of their own in performance and you pay that in the very small capacities but for $60 to get a way faster system after putting the OS, cache files, virtual memory etc on it was so worth it imo.
It would be awesome if you could test this drive against sata ssd and in more games, i wonder if there is a difference in fps and loading times, pcie 4.0 ssd's are still overkill for games so naturally there wont be a difference in fps and even loading times
My CPU heatsink didn't have an NVME SSD with it, i think I’ve been had!...
And even further, if you don´t have the game´s installation stored on a local drive, most people can´t even fully utualize an oldschool Sata-SDD due to limited download speed. I got 5MB internet meaning, installing from Steam I can´t even fully utualize the full oldschool SATA-speed (they can write about 5.3MB); you need to have a 1gb line at least to make it a difference during online installations, because that´s the NVMe speeds we´re talking about with gen5. So why bothering about a giant NVMe which requires at least a Gigabit connection to really feel a difference? And which server is putting such giants into their servers? For most, 3Gen NVMe are probably still doing just fine and will so for the next decade.
It's ddr3 speeds, fast but probably still slower due to latency, so the benefits of having alot of storage for paging file is less, than just buying more ram and sata ssd.
understatement of the century, the latency is the main bottleneck in normal ram already (hasn't improved since ddr2) the system wouldn't work at all with ssd latency lmao.
gta 5 is THE benchmark to test for storage
The fastest ssds are optanes and it's not even close, especially in terms of gaming performance seeing their latency is 5-10x lower
Load times are not as important as how fast data is being received & sent from your ssd while playing games
Jesus the iops are terrible, my 1.5tb optain drive has rnd4k reads of 68768 and rnd4k writes of 50910.
consider doing this test with a drive with lower latency instead of one that takes a thousand years to push the larger files out faster, and without cutting your gpu lanes!
Yeah exactly. My optane p1600x does 115k qd1 read iops and 88k qd1 write iops. This ssd does about 25k.
In my experience these heatpipes will start to dry out in 5 to 10 years - this is not good for really long term use.
I wish technology would slow down so I can stop
mb
Gen 6 ssd will be with built in AIO
😂😂😂