KODAK TMax P3200

A look at Kodak TMax 3200 which is rate at 1000 if developed with kodak chems and 800 if not ....however you shoot it at 3200 and its pushed during development .If you want the ability to shoot coal miners or your local band , in that badly lit pub/bar that sells that cider that you can also use to remove rust then this is your film.......bring the grain
if your a multi-millionaire you can buy it from amazon
amzn.to/3Xdzvcw
However You can buy other great and interesting films at reasonable prices here ....
www.ebay.co.uk/usr/northernfilm
developing and scanning these lovely people
www.analoguefilms.co.uk
Subscribe for more reviews and videos www.youtube.com/@28allday?sub...

[@braixeninfection6312]

I never shot a 3200 iso film before. But I have pushed Superia X-Tra to 1600. The shots were quite grainy but maybe not as much as this stock. It is something that I would like to try some day!

[@28allday]

push color is pretty tricky I shot some Portra 800 up 1250 and the results were useable however at 1600 it had a really bad yellow tint and the color was mush . B/W is far more forgiving with pushing some people have shot ilford delta at 6400 and had very good results

[@thedarkslide]

You're not exactly providing the most helpful information here. Viewers beware!
Here is an example:
3:07 This image is clearly massively underexposed. There is no information whatsoever in most parts of the image - because you shot it at ISO3200 instead of ISO800. You underexposed the image by 2 shots (if metered "correctly"), then it got developed at ISO3200 without pushing it. You should have shot it at ISO800 and have it developed at ISO3200 (=pushed by 2 stops). If you shoot it at ISO3200, you need to let the lab know that you want to push it by two stops with ISO3200 being the baseline, e.g. push developing it for ISO 12800. Check the data sheet on the film for details.
To sum up: shoot it at ISO800, develop it at ISO3200 according to the data sheet by Kodak. Don't overthink it!

[@28allday]

Thanks for you comment however its incorrect have a re read of the data sheet see below as you can see it has a nominal speed of 1000 depending of developer however most labs well the ones I have used, will develop this at 3200 unless other wise told . the shoot you mention was shot at 3200 and developed at 3200 as per the spec sheet .....if you note the devolvement times on the other side of the spec sheet you can see what I mean. each speed has a different development spec .....however you do need to tell the lab to under or over expose it if that what you want .... if you shoot at 3200 or it box speed that what they develop it as .....
"The nominal speed is EI 1000 when the film is processed in KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX Developer or KODAK PROFESSIONAL T-MAX RS Developer and Replenisher, or EI 800 when it is processed in other KODAK black-and-white developers. It was determined in a manner published in ISO standards. For ease in calculating exposure and for consistency with the commonly used scale of film-speed numbers, the nominal speed has been rounded to EI 800.
Because of its great latitude, you can expose this film at EI 1600 and yield negatives of high quality. There will be no change in the grain of the final print, but there may be a slight loss of shadow detail. When you need a higher speed, you can expose this film at EI 3200 or 6400. At these speeds, there will be a slight increase in contrast and graininess with additional loss of shadow detail. (See the processing tables for adjusted development times.).
Because of the shape of the characteristic curve of the film, you will obtain better shadow detail and highlight separation when you expose it at EI 3200 or 6400 than you can obtain with 400-speed films pushed by 3 stops"