ARABIC DISCOVERY: The Origin of ALL languages | Arabic101
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 05. 2024
- ↪ ↪ If you can, please support the Channel: / 101arabic
↪ ↪ My Books: store.arabic101.org/product-c... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this lesson, I try to summarize Dr. Ismail's research on classic Arabic being the origin of languages. I mainly used her book to prepare the contents of this lesson.
You can find the book through this link: arabic101.org/product/classic...
I also used other sources in preparing this lesson:
Book: اللغة العربية أصل اللغات العالمية
Book: معجم الفردوس
Fatwa: bit.ly/3UHtENa
Fatwa: bit.ly/3y4fSez
PLEASE share the video as much as you can to spread the word and share the ajer in shaa Allah ...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
↳ Facebook: /101Arabic
↳ Twitter: @101Arabic
↳ Website: Arabic101.org
↳ Store: store.arabic101.org
#arabic101 #learnarabic #Arabic #tajweed #learntajweed #arabicdiscovery
"Amir Al Bahr" , became "Amiral" in French and " Admiral" In English
This is an example of loan words
In Sindhi an Indian language we call it mir bahar
@@MohammadAslamMagsiin Sindhi it’s also Amir Al bahr but after Baluch conquest it became Mir Al bahr
@@mirtalpur739 bro our elders narrate stories. They call it mir bahar. Wallah Allam
Although Arabic is a very beautiful and rich ancient language, especially Quranic Arabic, which has influenced many other languages, it couldn't be the case that all other languages originated somehow from Arabic, because the Arabic language can't be older than the prophet Ibrahim or Ismail pbut and from modern historical science we know that these prophets lived approximately 5000 - 5500 years ago. Moreover, even when the prophet Ibrahim left Mesopotamia (Iraq) for Palestine, he spoke the language of his fathers, the Mesopotamian language, which is different from ancient Arabic of the times of prophet Muhammad pbuh or ancient Hebrew of the prophets Musah and Harun pbut.
Yes I also believe that the origin of language is far older than Arabic and it may no longer exists now, and that doesn't lower my respect toward Arabic as the language of Qur'an
No
Who told you arabic is not ancient or that it didnt exist before the time of ismail peace be upon him?
Jarham , the first arabic *tribe* to live in makka , after asking permission from hajar , the mother ismail himself , jarham was speaking arabic (an ancient way of arabic that died eventually) and ismail learned it from them
Also , there was Thamod and A'ad (with the mighty city of Erum), two great people of arabia who existed well before ibrahim ,Erum itself was mentioned by Phoenicians almost 10 thousands years ago , theyre known btween arabs as the "arab bae'dah" or extinct arabs, theyre the forefathers of arab civilization and theyre ethnic arab
Fyi , arabs are divided into 2 categories, 3 are subcategories:
1)arab ba'edah or "extinct arabs" (extinct arab tribes like A'ad, Thamod, and the nabatians)....
2)arab arebah or "arab arabs" (the arab tribes who still live to this day and age, those who can trace their lineage back to known ancient arab tribes) those too are ethnic arabs who the language was born in their communities and civilization
2) arab musta'arebah or "arabnized arabs" the arabs that werent ethnic arabs but their mother language is arab, like alot of people in north africa or some minorities in different areas around the arab world ... Being an ethnic arab or an arabnized arab doesnt really make a difference tho , scholars argue that if your mother tongue is arabic , then youre an arab , regardless of your lineage
@@someone_7233 as far as I know Arabs consider themselves as descendants of prophet Ismail pbuh and his twelve sons. If so, how could his ancestors be Arabs and speak Arabic? Those ancient nations you mentioned were not Arabs, but nations who lived in the Arabic peninsula or in the Middle East. Maybe their languages were close to later Arabic, but those languages were not Arabic. Don't be like Jews who claim that prophets Ibrahim, Nuh, and Adam pbut were Jews and spoke Hebrew. Probably, all Sematic languages originated from the language of Mesopotamia, where prophet Ibrahim pbuh was born and grew up.
As far as i know, Ibrahim was praying in Quran " i settle my offspring in the uncultivated valley, close to your sacred house, ... Make people's hearts turn to them." This means there was tribe live near that Area, that was the Arab Musta'ribah
@@flowerinkplant it doesn’t mean it was a tribe there. Prophet Ismail’s mother couldn’t find any water in the area for a while and ran between the tops of two hills Safa and Marua to see if there any water sources in the area, while the baby was crying. At that time, prophet Ibrahim pbuh had already moved to the modern Palestinian land from modern Iraqi land, and he was quite old. When his second son, prophet Ishaq (Isaak) was born, he was too old.
İn Azerbaijan language (azerbaijanian turkish) 60 % may be even more are Arabic . There for it is easy to remember new words for us . Elhamdullilah
Niyə yalan danışırsan axı hardan altmış faiz oldu? Özünüzdən rəqəm uydurmağı elə sevirsiz ki
@@ramiz313 ailə, zəif, səadət, müəllim, sual, maaş, bədii, mətbəə, aləm, məna, elan, xüsusi, səliqə, rəng, rəsm, rəssam, rəf, məktub, vəfa, ticarət, sirr, həll, hiss, xətt, tibb, hədd, nəsr − nasir − mənsur; şəkil − təşkil − mütəşəkkil; eşq − aşiq − məşuq − məşuqə, məktəb, məktub, kitab, katib, dərs, tədris, mədrəsə, sinif, elm, Allah, rəbb, islam, peyğəmbər, məscid, müsəlman, inam, səcdə, ilahi, həcc, axirət, cənnət, şeytan və ilaxır... adlardanƏkbər, Zəhra, Ömər, Cəfər, Həsən, Əli, Fatma,..........
@@ramiz313 dilçilik elminilə maraqlanın. Burda yazdıqlarım sözləri hər gün istifadə olunanlardı. Ərəb mənşəlidir. Və burda heç bir qəbahət yoxdu. Sözlər daha çox var. Maraqlıdırsa elminkitablara nəzər salın və ya özünüz elmə üz tutun. Salamat!
@@inamplanet7796 mən demədim e ərəb dilinə məxsus sözlər az işlənir Azərbaycan dilində mən dedim ki 60 faizi hardan aldın Hansi kitabda yazılıb axı o faiz?
You are talking specifically about the connection between Arabic and European languages. A lot of Asian, African, Aboriginal and Native American languages have nothing to do with Arabic.
Yep. Just look at the languages that never had contact with Arabic and the Middle East and you’ll see how baseless his claims are. I’d love to see him try to show how Chinese or Korean words come from Arabic roots - there just isn’t any relation at all
I am Somali and I assure you that many Somali terms are derived from Arabic, and some terms have disappeared and the Arabic term remained, such as “time” which is “waqti” = وقت.
Thank you.
@@user-yn1ur5us8r of course, because Somali people had lots of interactions with Arabs. But I’m not talking about you.
@@user-yn1ur5us8r Somali is related to Arabic, but thousands (yes, literally thousands) of other African languages have no relation to Arabic at all
30% of Urdu is Arabic … it truly elevates the Hindi into a beautiful poetic language
30% Persian AND Arabic, more common words are often from Persian because Arabic words are from Persian, not directly Arabic
Urdu is much older than Hindi and Hindi borrows a lot from Urdu.
The standardized form of Urdu is older than the standardized form of Hindi.
@@IDKWhat0 Bassam Al-Rabiah, professor of Persian literature at King Saud University, contributed that “The Persian Language Academy in Tehran confirms that the Arabic language constitutes about 60% of the vocabulary of the Persian language.”
@@IDKWhat0 There has been a literary and cultural exchange between Persians and Arabs since pre-Islamic times, but for every foreign Persian word there is an Arabic word that corresponds to it in meaning, and there is not a single foreign Persian word in the Qur’an.
I'm not an Arab, but subhanallah arabic is the greatest language in the world, I mean God the almighty picked it for the final revelation.
@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhIt is literally the richest language in the world, cry
@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh🤡
@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhjust because you don't understand it and find it hard doesn't mean it's the same for everyone, it is the richest language in the world that's a fact and it's very easy to speak, and it's the language of the Holy Qur'an and what People will speak in heaven insha'Allah... Indeed it's a superior language above others!
@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhIt’s the richest language definitely. English is dry and full of stolen words. Guess what language is the original of most of the stars in the sky’s names.. Many Arabic texts cannot be translated to weak English. And the script is its own art.
@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh came together with Arabic... when Greek girls wanted Egyptian property on the Nile and the only way to get it was to industrialize conflict... the original sin of property ownership
"[Proto-Indo-European] is hypothesized to have been spoken as a single language from approximately 4500 BCE to 2500 BCE [...] though estimates vary by more than a thousand years.
Wikipedia
Languages evolve so fast that no language spoken at the time of classical Arabic could have remained similar enough to be considered the same language since proto-Indo-European began to be spoken.
You never know.
@@MAbuRowais Yes, we know, lol. You can look at the historical record, ancient inscriptions, old texts, and see how different the language used was from the one we have today.
Brother, with all due respect, this video is misleading. You can believe that Arabic is a wonderful language, and acknowledge the ways in which it has heavily contributed to the vocabularies of many languages, while still being scientific about this.
Firstly, every language changes. Every single one. Arabic included. Arabic as it was 1400 years ago itself was the product of millenia of changes, as is every other language. Contribution of loaned vocabulary words IS NOT the same as being the "source language" of another tongue. That's why the Persian language, for all its Arabic loans, is incomprehensible to an Arab who doesnt speak Persian. Language is more than vocabulary. It's a system that is made up of syntax rules, morphology/grammar, and phonology. Vocabulary is one portion of the system.
Also, this completely goes out of the window when you compare Arabic to any Sinitic language, any Andean language - basically, anywhere not in contact with Muslims or Romans.
The internet is filled with this sort of pseudoscience. The guy cites one obscure book by an unknown author. These people do a disservice to Arabic by making such outlandish claims. Stick to tajweed I say. Don't try to branch out into the science of linguistics if you know nothing about it.
Exactly!
40% of words that are used in my language today are either Arabic or from Arabic root. And not just similarity, they are literally same words. Also, we're only counting ones used in modern days not the whole 14 centuries.
Subhan Allah, which Language?
@@Krassertyp7 I think that is my language which is somali
Probably because your language is semitic, or spoken by people who are muslims, and have been for a long time. YOUR CLAIM PROVES NOTHING!!! The claims presented in this video are OUTLANDISH and not backed up by ANY sources.
Maltese?
I'm gonna guess Turkish
"Tall" didn't mean tall until about 500 years ago.
Its similarity to an Arabic word is probably coincidental. Though one can speculate whether the change in meaning was influenced by Arabic.
"The sense of "being of more than average height (and slim in proportion to height)" probably evolved out of earlier meanings "brave, valiant, seemly, proper" (c. 1400), "attractive, handsome" (late 14c.), also "large, big" (mid-14c.), as sometimes in Modern English, colloquially.
The sense evolution is "remarkable," says OED (1989), but it notes that adjectives applied to persons can wander far in meaning (such as pretty, buxom, German klein "small, little," which in Middle High German meant the same as its English cognate clean (adj.))."
Etymonline
Altus (height) is a latin word, from arabic Al-tul الطول, which gave us alto in spanish. In sanscrit we have uttAla with the same meaning, at-tula. الطول.
@@NeoYas Pronounced At-tul because ط is a sun letter.
@@NeoYas "Latin word altus comes from Proto-Indo-European *h₂el-, and later Proto-Indo-European *h₂életi (To be nourishing.)" Cooljugator
@@anderslvolljohansen1556 Yes I know, that's the official hypothesis.
@@NeoYas What makes you believe Altus came from Arabic?
Arabic was the only way supposed to be the ship able to carry greatness of holly Quran
🤦♂️
No. That goes against the words of the Qur’an. It states that it was revealed in Arabic because that was the language spoken by the people of the Prophet. Had the Prophet been from France (for instance), the Qur’an would have been in French.
No?
This video has inaccuracies.
أرجو (I request, I hope) does not mean "rego" (to rule, to guide)
كنس (to hide/to retreat/to sweep) does not mean "cinis" (ashes, embers, ruin, destruction)
نقص (to decrease) does not mean "necesse" (necessary, needed)
Anglo-Saxon
ورى (creation, to kindle) does not mean "wara" (an inhabitant, to care, to guard)
هون (easy) does not mean "hwon" (a few, a little)
ورد (watering hole) does not mean "wyrt" (plant, vegetable, herb)
English
صنح (cymbal, harp) does not mean "song"
هب (thinking, to move suddenly) does not mean "hop"
رج (to shake) does not mean "rock"
...
75% of Latin verb roots and 80% of Anglo-Saxon verbs does not have Arabic origins. Latin and Anglo-Saxon have distinct roots in the Indo-European family, while Arabic belongs to the Afroasiatic family. Arabic has influenced European languages through trade and cultural exchanges, but not to this extent.
The word "سكر" (sugar), cited as an example in the video, originates from Middle Persian (𐭱𐭪𐭥), which, in turn, derives from the Sanskrit word "शर्करा." Like all languages, Arabic has borrowed words from other languages, a process that is a natural part of linguistic evolution. Arabic isn't unique in this regard, as linguistic exchange is a universal phenomenon.
The claim that words stem from Arabic instead of Latin due to the greater number of Arabic roots is logically flawed. A language having more roots doesn't imply that specific words in another language originated from it. Language development is complex, involving various influences that cannot be explained by sheer volume alone; historical interactions, trade, and cultural exchanges play a crucial role.
As Muslims, we need to move beyond the idea of Arabic or Arab superiority. Arabic is a language like any other, not inherently more divine. If Allah willed, the Quran could have been revealed in any language, just as easily. To claim that Arabic was uniquely necessary for this purpose undermines Allah's boundless power.
You must be the funniest in a party, what you here said IS ALSO A THEORY. I don't know if you understand how etymology works and that everything is based mainly on suppositions because we don't have text that goes back to pre-history. He literally just showed another theory with its proofs, just say that you are an Arab hater.
@@Omroqurba Please let me know how I am an "Arab hater" for saying Arabs aren't superior to other Muslims and if the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) was also an "Arab hater" for saying, "Verily there is no superiority of an Arab over a non-Arab or of a non-Arab over an Arab..." Ahmad (22978).
@@MixtureGuy WE ARE SPEAKING ABOUT ARABIC, THE LANGUAGE. AND YOU ARE ACTUALLY HATING ON ARABS, WE SEE HOW THE WEST BRAINWASHED YOU
@@MixtureGuyWhat you say is true! In the video he neglects that fact that Arabic is a member of the Afro-Asiatic Indo Arabian language family. This means that it is a Semitic Language related to Hebrew and Syriac languages. This part of the map was a crossway for the world, affecting many African, Central/South Asian and European languages. However, this language has pretty much no affect on Sino Asiatic Languages such as Chinese and couldn't of spread to North America. Additionally, comprehensible Arabic is not older that 1500 years old, after Islamic influence "unified" its dialects.
@@Omroqurbaokay first of all just because he said it’s a theory does not absolve him from critiques of this theory, and that does not allow him to blatantly lie about things in order to support it
This is a bit over the top in my opinion (im arab by the way), the reason of similarities could be that in the golden age of islam baghdad (the capital of iraq) was the place for science and everything was written in arabic back then so the students in every part in the world used to travel to baghdad and translate books to transfer the knowledge to their country, and over time they got affected by some vocabularies (not everything could be tranlated) and it develobed overtime to become actual words
Similar to whats happening now in the arab world we use lots of english words in our daily speech because everything now in English and anyone who wants to get education he must know english and some of these words actually made it to the formal language like "Computer" = "كومبيوتر" (i know this isn't a good example)
حاسوب حبيبي😅
@@MAm-tf4bx عارف ي حب بس انا مش فاكر كلمة تانية 😅 حاسب آلي او حاسوب او كمبيوتر
@@Tomato_League "Computer" = "كومبيوتر" is a very lazy translation, from ignorant of arabic. The arabic word should be مِعددة or مِقسمة . So the weird word كومبيوتر is not from any linguist.
@@victoremman4639 it has multiple translations like حاسوب ، حاسب آلي ، كمبيوتر (اسم أعجمي), I just didn't have a good example
@@Tomato_League Even what you propose in not accurate, because the translation you gave took the morphem -er of computeur as a Doer, so the alif in حاسوب . In latin languages we say Ordinateur, means Ordinate so root صفف could be another way to name Computer. If you considere a Computer in not an A doer, so the arabic prefix should be Mi-, a tool, not a Doer.
Thank you for mentioning the resources. Please keep us informed about your resources in every video so we learn more from them
as someone who speaks a sinitic language, I don’t think arabic has influenced it much, but southeastasian languages all have had similar influences from sinitic languages. sometimes abrahamic religious people tend to have a euroasian perspective on the world and forget that there’s more to just that part of the world. but I love arabic and it was still a nice video to watch :)
In the video he neglects that fact that Arabic is a member of the Afro-Asiatic Indo Arabian language family. This means that it is a Semitic Language related to Hebrew and Syriac languages. This part of the map was a crossway for the world, affecting many African, Central/South Asian and European languages. However, this language has pretty much no affect on Sino Asiatic Languages such as Chinese and couldn't of spread to North America. Additionally, comprehensible Arabic is not older that 1500 years old, after Islamic influence "unified" its dialects. (I speak Zulu and Chinese besides English so I can confirm)
@@DinoBryce well said! and wow so happy to hear that you speak chinese besides english and zulu 🥹🙏 that’s very cool
Jazaak’Allaahu khaira brother for this invaluable insight 🎉
Subhan Allah. The Arabic language has always been one of the richest, if not the richest language in the world.
Anime is haram.
Stop watching it.
@@maktabati_ The One who decides what is haram or halal is Allah (S.W.T), His messenger, and the people of knowledge (high scholars of Islam), not some random user on youtube.
Also my avatar is not from an anime. Delete your comment.
سبحان الله ، اللغة العربية هي اغنى واثرى لغة في العالم ، في الماضي وفي الحاضر. سبحان من اختارها لكي تكون لغة الوحي والرسالة الاخيرة لبني آدم
Guys please watch the video before jumping to conclusions lol, although not all of the information here is accurate, the channel doesn't claim Arabic is the original language, he just wanted to share a theory by a researcher. Many languages in the world have been proposed to be the "original" language.
yeah the theory is usually referred to as proto-world. meaning a reconstructed language that branches into all languages we have today. claiming that Arabic in its current standard form is the same language as proto-world makes little sense given the changes that all languages inevitably go through. Arabic, too, surely underwent many changes before and after its standardization. It could be argued that most word roots from proto-world were preserved and passed down in Arabic though, under the assumption that the proto-world theory is correct
all the information is actually accurate, please this neutral hate shit is out of season
The video is trying to claim all languages come from Arabic. Which makes no sense considering the fact that there must have been a language before Arabic. Each language has a specific time period; it is impossible to keep a language alive without changing it unless it is only kept alive as a written language (which is the case with both Fusha Arabic and Latin, for example). The time period for spoken Fusha Arabic is approx. 600-800 AD and if you count Old Arabic which is a different language(s) the time period goes back to maybe 900 BC. It is clear that the author has heavily studied Arabic and has a great deal of appreciation for the language, but it doesn't seem like he has studied Philology, which is needed to understand a topic such as this one. Word cognates are expected to be found across most languages in the world, whether all languages come from the same source or not. Trace back Arabic far enough, and you get Proto-Afro-Asiatic, which the "oldest" reconstructed language in the world, in other words the oldest language known to exist. Look into that language instead of saying "Arabic is the oldest language". Think about it, if every language comes from the same source, then it logically follows that EVERY language in the world is the oldest language. You guys haven't studied this and it really shows. Maybe read about it before taking some guy's personal fringe theory as truth. Islam never claims that Arabic is the original language of humanity btw. If you believe that every language came from the same source, then every language that exists today is some kind of dialect of that original language, including Arabic. This is no "neutral hate", this is Philology. Have any of you studied Philology?
@@Omroqurba there's mistakes in the video.
@@calleha01 good analysis on the proto world
@Arabic 101 This is a very flawed claim: Three major problems: 1. having more root words does not make a language the source of another language with lesser roots.. a language that has been influenced by multiple other languages will also have many roots and often those roots have similar meaning, example; English being influenced by Romance (latin) and Germanic (anglo-saxon) has more roots than either. 2. Why no mention of years, places and time periods when discussing language history (etmology) the oldest evidence of the existence of arabic is not much before Islam.. Arabic belongs to the Semitic group of languages of which Aramaic and Hebrew are much older. Semitic languages themselves belong to Afro-Asiatic languages which are much older and have been the origin for many languages across Africa. 3. The words with similarity to english have developed less than two thousand years back and mainly after the Islamic conquests and via Arab traders. If Arabic is the origin of these languages why are there no words before these influencing events??
In the video he neglects that fact that Arabic is a member of the Afro-Asiatic Indo Arabian language family. This means that it is a Semitic Language related to Hebrew and Syriac languages. This part of the map was a crossway for the world, affecting many African, Central/South Asian and European languages. However, this language has pretty much no affect on Sino Asiatic Languages such as Chinese and couldn't of spread to North America. Additionally, comprehensible Arabic is not older that 1500 years old, after Islamic influence "unified" its dialects. (I know I have commented this like 10 times but it's still important)
Great effort! Hope you talk more about the origins of languages and the 10 Qira'at.
@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhYou haven't proven that they are lies with your theory
@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh Ye he said so many lies for examples:
...
what lies, kid?
bet u keep crying cuz he has no proo- nvm, maybe cuz it is stup- nvm, ur just crying because it has a link to Islam bro, man up and be Muslim.
@@AceLegend-vv5tythe claims in this video are OUTLANDISH. Look up the etymologies of the words in the video. Harbour is a germanic word-claiming that it’s related to Arabic is madness. Look it up yourself!!!!!!!!!
He did say that tho and he also went further back to its origin. Do your own research man.
@@starlonga i cant see what my original comment said so i am unsure what ur talking about due to my poor memory but it is still a theory with some claims and facts but u don't have to accept it.
بعشق دروسك الماتِعة. زادك الله علماً ونفع بك.
may ALLAH reward you❤
Ameen
Ameen
Absolutely amazing!!! خزاك الله خيرا
*جزاك*
Assalam alikum
Jazak Allah khair for very interesting and informative video my friend👍🏻 thank you so much🤝
Does anyone know what's the name of this app the brother uses for the illustration?
This video seems to completely neglect the development of the English language. For example, look up the etymology of the word "tall" - late Middle English: probably from Old English getæl ‘swift, prompt’. Early senses also included ‘fine, handsome’ and ‘bold, strong, good at fighting’.
It's very unscientific to take the modern definition of a word and compare it to classical Arabic whilst ignoring the history of the word and how it has evolved and the meaning has changed.
The methodolgy is all over the place. You accept the modern meaning of "tall", but you go have to old German for "Harbour". And even this denies that the habour is traced back to two words harjaz, meaning army, and bergo, meaning protection. I can't find a reference for "hunan Berg" This is the definition of cherry picking.
Not to mention that Classical Arabic itself has its own history, with other semitic languages like Hebrew and Akkadian having a far earlier attestation.
Any meaningful analysis would have to take place at the level of the proto languages.
Just because things are similar that doesn't mean they are related.
Sorry to say, but this video flies in the face of literally everything we know about linguistics.
Allah knows best.
Nop. You just show you believe the western etymologists whom invented the PIE. I made etymologic investigation, and many proves that linguists of the 19th century made speculations without root. One thing important to keep in mind : the words are borrowed, so we don't know when "Tall" came in english, it could be in the 14th century, when jews were expelled from Spain, and reached netherland and later on england. So my point here : the protosemitic langue is the source of the PIE. I wrote many articles for demonstrations, going deeper than this video. The word Earth is semitic : أرض. Try to deny :)
@@victoremman4639 The claim that a tiny immigrant population of Jews could have influenced the majority of farming peasants in Western Europe to start using the words "earth" or "tall", something that they would have used on a daily basis, is frankly, absurd, especially when you consider that the Sephardic Jews themselves didn't speak Hebrew as a daily language. But feel free to demonstrate, using textual evidence, the evolution of these words from Ladino into Dutch and or English.
I'd be happy to read your article for a deeper conversation.
@@Mehmet_Fateh I show you again what is absurd in your reasoning : the Jews came from Spain, the country with more knowledge in these time, and knowing also the written, when your farming people were illettrated. I know the people like you, firm believers on feary tells PIE invented language, knowing so little about anthropology or nothing. Try to prove Earth is not semitic. Wait serious argument from you. You may see : my coms disappeared in yutub. Found ""The english and its semitic origin arabeclassique forum actif"", many demonstrations. I just had try to explain further Earth and its origin, so again : أرض compound by etyma Rdz = compression, so the Earth front the Skies. You have here an exegesis aswell. The prefixed Hamza means Causality, aswel First. Middle Dutch eerde, Dutch aarde, Old High German erda, German Erde, Gothic airþa. My hypothesis fit with history and geopgraphy, middel age in north west europa. Foolish to follow an invented PIE.
@@Mehmet_Fateh I add this : the word أرض carries the etyma RDz wich means Compression, so the Earth front the Skies. See, the semantic analysis joined Theology and exegesis, semitic one. The A prefixed to archaic root RDz means Causality, is an archetyp meaning aswell First : Ardz. Middle Dutch eerde, Dutch aarde, Old High German erda, German Erde, Gothic airþa . So my hypothesis fit with the historical datation of its use, geography too, middle age in north west europa, when jews spread within europa. Foolish to follow the track of the invented PIE.
@@Mehmet_Fateh Issue with yutb, again and again : @Mehmet_Fateh I show you again what is absurd in your reasoning : the Jews came from Spain, the country with more knowledge in these time, and knowing also the written, when your farming people were illettrated. I know the people like you, firm believers on feary tells PIE invented language, knowing so little about anthropology or nothing. Try to prove Earth is not semitic. Wait serious argument from you. You may see : my coms disappeared in yutub. Found ""The english and its semitic origin arabeclassique forum actif"", many demonstrations. I just had try to explain further Earth and its origin, so again : أرض compound by etyma Rdz = compression, so the Earth front the Skies. You have here an exegesis aswell. The prefixed Hamza means Causality, aswel First. Middle Dutch eerde, Dutch aarde, Old High German erda, German Erde, Gothic airþa. My hypothesis fit with history and geopgraphy, middel age in north west europa. Foolish to follow an invented PIE.
Masha Allah. This discovery is outstanding.
Jazak-Allah khair
It’s false. Arabic is not the origin of all languages.
European languages might have gotten the word for sugar from Arab traders, but the Arabs themselves got it from the old Persians and the Persians from the Indians ( शर्करा • (śárkarā) in Sanskrit)
May Allah reward you! ❤💚🤍🌹
Ameen
This brother has taught us a lot of things about the Quran Recitation and Arabic language that we didn’t know so he is our teacher and we should respect him and if he has made any mistakes in this video or tried to teach us some “facts” about the “superiority” of Arabic language over other languages and made some mistakes then we should point them out with proof with due respect to him. Thanks.
I agree; Arabic is a unique and fascinating language just because of the facts we know beforehand (the most conservative Semitic language and still preserved today). However, the Arabic language cannot be used as a source to Indo-European languages; just the way they work when creating words (a root word system vs an agglutinating word system) are very different.
Bro what? Arabic is like 3000 years old only, and modern Homo sapiens are like 250,000 years old.
They don't believe in evolution
akhi sorry, but with this video you have made too many wrong implications that were baseless, for example when you said harbour came from arabic huna burj, or tall from arabic tal. If you look at their actual etymologies they are completely unrelated and come from complete distinct roots. I do not want to conter the fact that arabic is the best and chosen language, but you do not help showing it by using such inaccuracies
But you do know that most languages have atleast a little Arabic influence you know. For example in English: Algebra or Alcohol or in many Indonesian languages: Musibat. Spanish: Camisa and the article “El” etc
@@africankidd3642 Of course I know that there are words that came from arabic to other languages, the same as words from other languages came into other languages and arabic as well, but that’s not what he talked about. He theorized about arabic being somehow the root for all languages and used completely wrong assumptions and implications.
I checked harbour and it's exactly as he explained no need to comment without actual knowledge
Akhi sorry, but with this comment you have made too many wrong implications that were baseless.
For example, you say that our dear brother made: “TOO many bad implications” when you only cite 2 of these bad implications, out of the more than 60 examples of words cited in the video.
Furthermore, you say that the words Harbor and Tall do not come from the words Hunan Burj and Tal, and that in reality these words have completely different roots, you don't even mention which roots are different and don't even mention where did this information come from, what are your sources, what book did you get this information from?
Finally, you seem to ignore all the arguments used in this video to justify these reflections (such as the historical facts with the Turkish texts which have changed over time, passing to the origin of Arabic, or the origin of word harbour with the invasions of the United Kingdom by the Vikings, which supported the fact that harbour came from hunan burj, or the fact that Arabic has more than 16,000 roots while other languages have 20 at 8 times less, or the interpretation of certain verses of the Qur'An or the names of Adam, his wives and his children which have letters exclusive to the Arabic language and so on etc...) While you don't cite any arguments.
@@viperapps2114 Fact
Indonesian has a lot of loan words from Arabic. Even the names of the days of the week
With the exception of Sunday, it used to be called ahad, but nowadays commonly called Minggu
@@am3nnet ahad. minggu is also another name. both are applicable
yaa... bahasa indonesia/& Melayu banyak pinjaman daripada bahasa arab... Minggu pinjaman daripada bahasa Portugis - Domingo... mcm itu lah... 🫡🫡🫡
Subhan’Allah…..Great work …..your way of explaining is beautiful and inspiring ❤❤❤❤
First of all, it’s pretty obvious you have never studied linguistics. Indo-European languages, such as Greek, Sanskrit, Russian, English and even Bulgarian come from Proto-Indo-European, not Arabic because there has been done a lot of comperative linguistic research on the protolanguage. It is true, that languages can borrow terms and words from other languages, which was shown in your video. However, it seems that you have cherry picked examples for your video and did not go into semantic and pragmatic meaning of the words you discussed. Arabic comes from its own family, from which Hebrew, Coptic and other Semitic languages derive. What you did was basically to take words that ‘sound’ similar to Arabic and it is not a valid evidence for concluding that all languages come from Arabic. I would like to know about how Chinese, Greenlandic, languages of Africa, South American languages, languages of Oceania share, according to you, the common ancestor of Arabic. The same logic that you have used could be applied to make the claim that it is Hebrew, that is the protolanguage. So far, this video seems to me as poorly researched and heavily biassed.
YOU BLEW MY MIND YA AKHI!
"From the very beginning of Indo-European studies, there have been attempts to link the Indo-European languages genealogically to other languages and language families. However, these theories remain highly controversial, and most specialists in Indo-European linguistics are skeptical or agnostic about such proposals."
Wikipedia
16505 is about 75 percent of the allowable combinations of two and three letters if there are 28 to choose from and the first can't be doubled but the second can. 28×27×28+28×27=21924
Assuming Alif, ا, can't be one of the root letters, but hamsa can. I'm also assuming that waw, و, and yaa, ي, can be root letters.
That means any non-Arabic word with two or three consonants has a high probability of having consonants sounding similar to Arabic just by coincidence. Some combinations may be difficult to pronounce and therefore avoided across different languages, increasing the probability.
I'm not an Arabic speaker, so take what wrote about the number of possible roots with a grain of salt.
I also read there are some 4 and 5 root letter words, but that those are rare.
I was watching a young autistic boy in the Muslim faith who was raised watching and reading the Quran.. now he is a master of the Quran he might still ? Display autistic tendencies...but he is an excellent teacher on the Quran. I could not help but be fascinated over the fact that if everyone in the world was given a Quran to learn in their own language as well as in Arabic we could all learn the same language based on our knowledge of the same words. On top of this the Arabic language or the Quran look like sheet music have specific tones and amounts of specific beats to be enunciated. What a beautiful learning experience school could be if you learn the Quran and then went to music and then went to science or art or anything else that you had to do how you would embace everything in the language of God. SUBHANALLAH
Musical instruments are Haram by the way
@@thecoolnewsguy that would go for the voice also.. from what I've read it said that as long as the music is upright and righteous it is okay
@larsapher , الس لا ام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركته.
The hadith is clear in prohibition of musical instruments in general without any specification about truthfulness or piety of the music they are used for.
Also the narrations from sahabah regarding the Quranic verse are clear.
Also the speech of people of knowledge states the same fact, that musical instruments and music are prohobited. And some big scholars of madhahib even said that to say, that music is halal - is a disbelief. And Allah knows best.
May allah bless you, my brother. Be aware of such sources that make it permissible to listen to any music.
[There is only one exception for one specific musical instrument in one specific situation]
@ibn_abdirrahman what I did find was conflicting because it said that drums were considered okay tambourines were considered okay violin was considered okay if appropriate and pleasurable music as long as it was righteous and upright and not against the morals which much music in the west is negative and derogatory that is easy to see why it is around celebratory music I'm very vague .I will guess God will forgive us for dancing and enjoying music if we ask for it🙏🏿inshallah
JazakAllahu khair
🤍
"thats just a theory, a language theory"
Thank you for this informative video. 😄
Do you have Arabic books for tajweed?
can you please tell us the source for your claims about roots count?
U didn't even watch the video man !
When you try to learn the Arabic language, do not say that I am learning it because it is beautiful, but say that I am learning it to bring it closer to Allah and bring it closer to my God
This is what we call Arabic "Alneaa"
I intend to do something
When you intend to do something, say that I intended it for Alkreem
Intention is better than action
You should stick with Arabic lessons...
With this, what can kind of ᶜArabic is he teaching?!???!
In Malay Arabic script we used to maintain some of the Arabic spelling ❤
Yups... Aksara Jawi... Modified Arabic script to write bahasa Melayu and several local languages in Indonesia...
جزاك الله خيرا
Brother may Allah bless you and reward you the highest levels of paradise for the effort you put in teaching the Arabic tongue, and I especially love how you teach Arabic through The Glorious Quran.
May Allah bless your work
Thank you brother for your work👍
Arabic has had a huge influence on the vocabulary of many languages around the world, but this video is highly misleading in promoting a pseudoscientific hypothesis on the origin of Indo-European languages that is not based in sound historical linguistic methodology.
I encourage anyone watching to read up on the vast world of historical linguistics and the comparative methods that allow us to reconstruct the relationships between languages. Nationalist and religious movements have a long history of promoting their favored language as the origin of all others, but you are missing out on the fruits of an incredibly interesting field if you elevate these "theories" to the same level of centuries of critical, evidence-based investigation.
The truth is so much more interesting, I promise.
I googled the author of the book you cited and found nothing on him. Who is this genius T.A. Ismail who claims Arabic is not just the origin of the Semitic family of languages but also source of Indo-European family of languages. This is the dumbest thing I've heard.
I'm an asian learning arabic and this is true. I'm so impressed by how easy for me to learn Arabic since many of the word seems could be related to my own language.
Latin and Arabic belong to two completely different language groups; Indoeuropean and Semitic, respectively.
you mean afroasiatic?
@@ErenAlpErtem Yes. Semitic is a subgroup within the Afroasiatic language family. I found out after posting and wrote some comments about it.
Proto Latin and proto Semetic shared the same root, as do all languages on their timelines. This theory is wrong, however. Islamic history even accounts for the development of Arabic from proto-Semetic by naming a man y3rob يعرب as the first to speak Arabic, descended from Qahtan who was the origin of the Arab ethnicity within Semetic peoples.
Just as it accounted for how languages developed over time, Islamic history here also accounts for how ethnicities as social structures arise over time. The lineage of the prophet Muhammad for example is مستغرب meaning Arabized since the paternal lineage of the Quraysh is traced to Ismaiil, who was from the loins of Abraham and settled among the Arabs becoming Arabized.
Arabic has certainly changed less over time because of the Quran and the cultural value of eloquence pre-Islam prepared the language as a medium for revalation. The ayah that he mentioned where Adam was taught all names, which then became the basis for all languages is most correct.
Allahu 'Alam
@@Satoshi-yd7lj Latin is Indoeuropean. The common origin of the Indoeuropean goes back around 6000 years (+-).
Arabic probably didn't exist back then.
Semitic is a sub-group within the Afroasiatic languages.
@@Satoshi-yd7lj Languages change so fast that shared origins of major families beyond several thousand years is difficult or impossible to determine from similarities, because some similarities could be entirely coincidental.
This is so true. Thanks for the excellent material. I wonder what would be the similarities with chineese, because I believe that Islamic civilization is the origin of western civilization, but is chineese civilization was really different and isolated
Thank you bro ❤
Jazakallah khairan
brother = baradar in farsi = bhrata in bengali
borg = borgo meaning fort in bengali = qala3a in arabic = alcala in Spanish
mead = mod in bengali
bog (God) in Serbian = bhog-oban in bengali
God = khoda in farsi
tripoli = tri (three) + polli (villages) in bengali
tyre = teer meaning shore in bengali
que meaning what in spanish = qui in bengali
kuru in japanese = koro in bengali
shinto in japanese = shindhu in bengali meaning sindh = hindu
Bengali is an Indo-European language, this is why we share a lot of common vocabulary.
@@urielamauri7633 It's also undeniable there are thousands of Arabic words in Bengali, as well.
Thanks.
Thanks
everytime I watch a new video about arabic language makes me love it even more, and I used to love english more even so arabic is my mother language
I love you and your content you helped me a lot
Keep on❤️
@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh didn't understand, he lied in what??
@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh If you're going to accuse him of lying, then give us a flip notes of the truth so we could search the rest.
@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhhow did he lie????
He didn't, that dude is just coping
@@FactsWithActs copying from whom
Well, this is Exactly the Problem, the fact that there’s no such a scientific theory doesn’t negate the claim or the fact that Arabic is the source of All language, The Arabian peninsula mountains and valleys full with different Arabic Writings styles and script pre date any of its ‘sisters lang’, the fact that these findings not been examined and the claim or standard use by University’s or modern linguistics to determine an origin etc of a language is merely suspicion and conjecture , Not forgetting bias towards Arabic For known reason, And to determine this claim veracity not only on linguistic basis but Also archeology And anthropology, its scientific to claim Arabic is the source of All language and pre date any other language.
Wallah qasam! Only Allah Almighty can rewards you with dissemination of our deen along the globe 🌎 Masha Allah Tabarakallah 🙌🤲🙏
That's an interesting theory considering the fact just how similar the syntax of Semitic and Celtic languages is
سُبْحـانَ اللهِ وَبِحَمْـدِهِ عَدَدَ خَلْـقِه، وَرِضـا نَفْسِـه، وَزِنَـةَ عَـرْشِـه، وَمِـدادَ كَلِمـاتِـه!🌟
Wildly inaccurate video with loads of mistakes. Very odd for this channel. European languages are indo-European and have practically no linguistic relation to Semitic languages like Arabic, beyond the existence of loan words. Also a language can have a significant percentage of words that are loan words from an unrelated language. Persian and Arabic are COMPLETELY different languages with different roots but Persian has a ton of Arabic loan words. “Tall” to choose *just one example* from this video comes from proto-Germanic Talez not an Arabic word.
PS: if there was a connection between Arabic and Latin (and there isn’t) it would be the other way round as Greek and Roman culture had a huge influence on the northern Arabs . eg. The Nabatean architecture in Jordan and Saudi Arabia is based on Roman architecture but built by Arabs. Also before the arbs had their own alphabet they used other alphabets including the Greek alphabet. To suggest pre-Islamic Arabs influenced Latin makes no sense.
Assalamu Alaikum brother, I saw your silent recitation video, but in the mosque where I pray, the fans are running so fast that I can't even hear my recitation, what should I do?
what happened to asking politely
Jazak Allahu Khairun! 🇷🇴 ❤❤❤
Is this based on research?
It's a really interesting theory but it's very tough to prove, even while being hypothetical
Allahumma barik
Ameen
Typhical of Semitic language included Arabic is every word have root, word سكر have no root on it, so it must borrowed from another language, it borrow from Sanskrit शर्कर (zarkara) and there are another 15 words for Sugar in Sanskrit, just advice you need learn Philology to understand all languages in the world, and there are also Sanskrit's words in AlQuran too, dont be Fanatic with Arabic language and finally make you blind, in Islam all Languages is Egality, no one language is superior than others and no one language is inferior than others, i am muslim too, open your mind and read alot of Literature bro 🤝🤝🤝🤝
Sanskrit is derived from Tamil! ( sarkarai = sugar in Tamil… the oldest language)
@@zaksid3413 no, Sanskrit still oldest i think, it has 16 words for Sugar, how about Tamil?
The Quran is Arabic. The fact that some words in the Quran or names are not „originally“ Arabic does not make the Quran Inarabic. These words or names were known and used by the Arabs.
@@MAbuRowais which one I said that Quran is Inarabic? read slowly bro 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@zaksid3413 This is patently false, Dravidian languages have no relation to Sanskrit except loanwoards
The proposition, however interesting, lacks foundation. Firstly, you should put the translations of each of the words into English next to them. You also forgot to include other Indo-European language families, such as the Balto-Slavic branch and Greek branch. I sincerely doubt you will find much similarity there. Thirdly, you should link each word to Arabic by showing us the whole chain, and at each step of the chain you should put a translation of the roots.
Pseudo science, Hindus say Sanskrit is the origin of languages too. Both theories are not good
Thank God, someone understands.
أنت تتكلم بالعاطفة فقط ، و الحقائق العلمية و التاريخية ، لا تثبت بالعواطف ، بل تثبت بالبحث العلمي ، و بالدراسة في الكتب المتخصصة ، و بالأدلة العلمية.
I think this language sounds very beautiful because it has both powerful and soft tone it . 👍
Asalaamu alaykum everyone
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي الكريم
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
وعليكم السلام
Alaikuma saluma warahmatullAhi wa barakatu
@@Muslimcat980 omg I love your cat 😭 I showed it to my brother and he laughed.. the hat & the sibha prayer beads ☺️🥹
Amazing video
Will thay be any tawhid books?
@AlenHub if u saw my reply do respond pls. I dont see it now
Idk but your laging
I sawvit but couldnt replay
Should i send again. I mean the link i sent
@@ansif3981 yes pls
Where are you from, akhy al kareem?
Please explain the comparison between Arabic and Sanskrit and Tamil.
Arabic belongs to the Semitic language group which again belongs to the Afroasiatic languages. Semitic probably spread out of Africa.
"An origin [of proto-Afroasiatic] somewhere on the African continent has broad scholarly support,[65] and is seen as being well-supported by the linguistic data.[96] Most scholars more narrowly place the homeland near the geographic center of its present distribution,[18] "in the southeastern Sahara or adjacent Horn of Africa."[97] The Afroasiatic languages spoken in Africa are not more closely related to each other than they are to Semitic, as one would expect if only Semitic had remained in an West Asian homeland while all other branches had spread from there.[98] Likewise, all Semitic languages are fairly similar to each other, whereas the African branches of Afroasiatic are very diverse; this suggests the rapid spread of Semitic out of Africa.[65] Proponents of an origin of Afroasiatic within Africa assume the proto-language to have been spoken by pre-Neolithic hunter-gatherers,[92] arguing that there is no evidence of words in Proto-Afroasiatic related to agriculture or animal husbandry."
Wikipedia, 'Afroasiatic languages'
This is based on the myth of evolution, no point in arguing with this, Muslims don't believe in it. Etymology is often based on assumption, and this video may or may not have gotten things right, but the fact Arabic either influenced or is the origin for many words in other languages is undeniable in any case.
@@azur9773Languages change over time. That's not a myth.
@@anderslvolljohansen1556 Yes, languages do, but what you posted, I assume is based on the "out of Africa" theory. This is what I meant.
@@azur9773 No, genetic evidence points to human populations emigrating from Africa over ten times further back in time than when the Afro-Asiatic language entered Arabia.
@@anderslvolljohansen1556 watch the series "The Journey of Certainty" by dr Eyad Qunaibi
The word MEAN came from semitic معنى. See deep explanation on "The english and its semitic origin arabeclassique forum actif". There is another proves that semitic is the older language, because arabic kept the archetyps and etymas : the etymas are archaic arab roots, and the archetyps are the phones of the abjad, each letter has a meaning. The issue doing etymology, it's that PIE languages had lost some phones and invented new ones, like the P for the arabic B or F, or the latin T which could by a ط or a ت like in Tall ط and Tell ت. You'll find in sha' Allah many ressource in the key words above. Surah 2.31
May Allah bless you my brother/brothers for the video
Barak Allahu feek
This is true in Uganda specifically Luganda language we call sugar sukaali
Here in kenya we say sukari and am somalian in our language we say sukor!
😂
Trying to تعريب every thing in the world is a huge problem ...!!
This video full of misinformation and ignorance .
1: sugar is derived from sanskrit not arabic
2: those similarities don't necessarily mean that those words have common source, it means languages have limited sounds and letters to represent words.
3: english (+ most indo-european languages) are not root based languages as arabic and Semitic languages; so, your comparison here is misrepresentation (and root system doesn't mean richness, it's just how a certain language function).
4: camel has more 50 words doesn't mean arabic is rich, is just mean camel is existed and raised in the arabian peninsula ,, for example, you can see the opposite with an animal like pig; hundreds of names in english regarding pig and just one word (خنزير) in arabic.
5: first people who ever exist (حواء، آدم، قابيل، هابيل) these names have their roots in Hebrew not arabic and they neither sound arabic nor have unique arabic sounds originally, they just got arabicized as countless of other Hebrew names (إسماعيل، إسحاق، إبراهيم) and so on.
Arabic is just a language like any other language !
You are wrong about one thing: pigs also have more than one name
خنزير
خَنْزُوَان
النَاخِر
خِنزِيرَة
خِنَّوْص - دوبل
Asalam o Alaikum brother, i wanted to ask you about Surah al Isra
Very informative MashaAllah. The word "earth" and the arabic word "ard" is also so much alike.. It can olnly be that arabic is the oldest language and the origin of all languages.. It is very very odd and at the same time we muslims get why no one is really talking about this.. It is too obviois that this information can be a door for people to want to investigate this language, and further more the book of Allah SWT and discover that Islam is the true religion that Allah SWT chose for mankind.. SubhanAllah wa ALhamdulillah...
The language taught to Adam (A.S) was the original language and the main source of all languages, Arabic is the Direct descendant of the said language.
I mean technically all languages would be direct descendants according to this hypothesis.
I'm from Pakistan and I speak urdu which mixture of Arabic, Persian and Turkish languages.
From a historical angle this is familiar:
Once upon a time the Persians (possibly Xerxes, or Darius) decided to adopt Aramaic as the offical empirical language.
In order to find legitimacy for this language's preference over all others, they claimed that it is the oldest language.
Ever since then every language seeking legitimacy claims that it is the oldest language in existance.
French claims it is a Latin dialect, English has a whole mythology around it, Old Slavonic is claimed to be 'prehistoric'.
Similar claims are made about Prakrit: "Some Hindu's have objects or structures they claim are millions of years old"
and Hebrew: "We can infer the first language was Hebrew through Adam's name being derived from Ish Ha'adama"
both these claims are found in the Kitaab Alkhazari.
Even my neighbour swears that Arabic is merely a barbaric imitation of Chaldean Syriac ~his native language~.
Subhaan Allaah
Very cool
This conclusion is wrong, but much of the data is right.
According to Islamic history, يعرب was the first to speak Arabic which became the basis of all future Arabic, including the Arabic of the Quraysh. The proto-Arabic before y3rob is certainly related to and probably sounded a lot like proto-Hebrew.
Arabic has certainly changed less over time because of the Quran and Islam, and the cultural value of eloquence before the Quran also prepared the language as the medium for revelation. Proto-Semetic and proto-Indo European also probably sounded a lot like each other. He also fails to mention how other old languages like Sanskrit also share many characteristics to many other languages -- specifically Indo-European. Also, there are arguably loanwords in Arabic that even were mentioned in the Quran, such as قلم which is apparently Greek in origin (or they both could have a common origin). He mentioned "better" as a weak point for the comparative of "good" yet behter in Hindi, Urdu, and Farsi share the same root, for example.
The ayah that explained that Adam knew the names of everything which was the basis for all the different branches of language families is correct. It explains everything nicely.
A mistake in his reasoning is that the "Arabic" names of the first people and prophets are often Arabized names of Hebrew names. There are clues in the Ayaat that Allah is aware of the meaning of the original Hebrew names as well.
والله أعلم
great
Habeel is derived from Abel, Qobeel is derived from Qayn, these are from Israeliyat's Name... Hawa also derived from Israeliyat's name, Ava or Hava, means Life or Hayat in Arabic, those names never mentioned in Qur'an, but were based on Islamic Tradition, or translation from Arab Jew that lived amongs Arab People
Brother, please make video of Sana manuscript problem.