Jordan Peterson: The Distribution of Productivity and Creativity

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 29. 09. 2017
  • Jordan B Peterson (born June 12, 1962) is a Canadian clinical psychologist and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. In this clip he talks about Price's law and its application on the distribution of productivity and creativity.
    This is from his Personality Lecture 2017. Full video quoted under fair use: • 2017 Personality 19: B...
    You can support Dr. Peterson at his Patreon: / jordanbpeterson
    ---
    This channel aims at extracting central points of presentations into short clips. The topics cover the problems of leftist ideology and the consequences for society.
    If you like the content, subscribe to the channel!

Komentáře • 56

  • @PhilosophyInsights
    @PhilosophyInsights  Před 6 lety +11

    If you are interested in this topic, then this clip about IQ in the labour market may interest you:

  • @Tony-kf9yb
    @Tony-kf9yb Před rokem +1

    I wish people would understand how important this message and law is

  • @MultiAlanR
    @MultiAlanR Před 6 lety +11

    I work in an office in the public sector and I know I do a lot more work than a lot of the others. They're full of ideas of worker's rights and doing only the bare minimum they're expected to do. The problem is, in the public sector the philosophy is that everyone is equal.

  • @anastasiahopkinson5676
    @anastasiahopkinson5676 Před 6 lety +7

    Price's square root hypothesis is intended to apply to the productivity of authors. There is no theoretical or practical application of Price's law to the productivity of bureaucracies, as is suggested in this presentation. Productivity is achieved by management skills.

  • @slimmorden5771
    @slimmorden5771 Před 6 lety +3

    A new manager arrived in a huge, failing company. To resuscitate the corporation the first move was to eliminate 1,500 executive positions.

  • @wandersl
    @wandersl Před 6 lety +3

    Economy is not a zero sum game and it is by no means inevitable that after enough iterations all the wealth ends up in the hands of a tiny minority. I'm surprised to see Jordan Petersson suggest this, using Monopoly for his argument.

  • @frankies.4500
    @frankies.4500 Před 4 lety

    Are Prices Law and the Pareto distribution the same?

  • @nosotrosloslobosestamosreg4115

    Fight Club in a nutshell

  • @qwertyqart
    @qwertyqart Před 6 lety +4

    So what's the difference between Price's law vs Pareto?

  • @gatovillano7009
    @gatovillano7009 Před 6 lety

    I would argu that Hayden was one of the most prolific composer of his period

  • @LightInTheNight1337
    @LightInTheNight1337 Před 6 lety +4

    That's not what "linear" means...

  • @PaulStringini
    @PaulStringini Před 6 lety +1

    How many employees does the federal government have?

  • @sinisterminister9920
    @sinisterminister9920 Před 3 lety

    Wow Jordan Peterson also gives us business advice😂🙌🏼👽💗

  • @jmctigret
    @jmctigret Před 6 lety +1

    If you make 35,000 dollars a year your in the top 1% in the world. The global median income is just $1,225 a year

  • @tylerchristensen1484
    @tylerchristensen1484 Před 6 lety

    I was thinking of Captain Price from Call of Duty.

  • @11kravitzn
    @11kravitzn Před 5 lety +3

    "You can look it up"

  • @drewsykes8231
    @drewsykes8231 Před 6 lety

    there are other laws they dont know what to do so the incompetent lawyers and judges put them in prison

  • @herculeholmes504
    @herculeholmes504 Před 6 lety

    I don't follow. Does he mean the people who bring in the most money, or the people who do the most work? In my job, the amount of work I do has little obvious effect on the amount of profit my company makes. And there is also the issue of waste; the same person who has a high level of productivity can also be the same person who generates the highest level of waste, but the money he is throwing away may never be accounted to him.

  • @charlesclem
    @charlesclem Před 6 lety +1

    If in a company with 100000 employees, only 316 people were responsible for 50% of the entire productivity, that company wouldn't last a week in business. Organizations of that size have many departments and sub-branches. If they had, say 100 such departments employing 1000 each and each of the departments obeyed Price's square root law, you now have 3162 people responsible for 50% of the organization's total productivity, which makes more sense.

  • @artmyb
    @artmyb Před 3 lety

    to the cameraman who doesn't turn it to where peterson's laser points at: you had one job man