Stellaris | 3.11 "Eridanus" Feature Highlight Video
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 06. 2024
- The free 3.11 "Eridanus" Custodian update is now live! Join Game Director Eladrin for an overview of what's new in the latest version of Stellaris.
Have questions about the Stellaris Expansion Subscription? Check out our FAQ: pdxint.at/42YDCMw
Review the 3.11 Patch Notes on the Paradox forums: pdxint.at/49NoG6d
__________
Follow us on social media for Stellaris News, Announcements and other fun stuff!
Discord: pdxint.at/StellarisDiscord
Forum: pdxint.at/StellarisForum
Twitter: pdxint.at/StellarisTwitter
Facebook: pdxint.at/StellarisFB
Steam: pdxint.at/StellarisSteam
Website: stellaris.com
#Stellaris #paradoxinteractive #update - Hry
Have questions about the Stellaris Expansion Subscription? Check out our FAQ: pdxint.at/42YDCMw
The problem with subscriptions, is that do will never own anything so, once the subscription end, you end up with nothing... and (in some case I heard), without your own creation because it "technically" belong to the subscription... so, NO! If they want to go that way, it would be better if after 6 months (let's say) that some DLC (3-4?) become free to own by the subscriber... or after a while you get some reward points that could be redeemed for an actual DLC. That would be more faire I believe.
Or lese, they'd better create a universe like EVE Online.
@@avollant Normally I'd be mad too, except for the fact that you can still choose to buy the DLC instead, or just make do without it.
Making a subscription the only way to play a game or access most of its content would be underhanded. Making a subscription a customer choice, where they can still choose to purchase the product and its content outright, sounds absolutely fine to me.
I am a new player (less than a month) and I just got the subscription. The subscription solved a problem for me. I did not know if I would enjoy the game long term and as I was exploring the game I found I could not be as creative I wanted to be without the DLC. Now that I have everything unlocked, I am enjoying the game far more.
Random idea for the subscription. Have it so that after X amount of subscription months you "unlock" a DLC permanently, but make is so that its like 2x more expensive that just buying .
option A - Buy the expansion right away and own it forever.
option B - pay the subscription and gain temporary access to all DLC. After X amount of months of paying for a subscription, you get a copy of some DLC's to keep forever, but you paid 2x more than if you just purchased the DLC normally .
you would essentially be making a wager with the player. The player is saying that they think they will get bored after a month and the subscription would be very good value. You are wagering that you can keep the full game fun enough that a person won't cancel the subscription.
I hope you add internal politics in the next dlc. Plus make government types like Imperial/ democracy feel more different
with something like that, I would like them to rework feudal empires to work like crusader kings with familes etc.
@@tenaciousgamer6892Idk if they could do something as complex as Crusader Kings' character management, but I'll love to have at least some sort of small and oversimplified family tree for Feudal and Imperial. Imagine being able to marry for a small bonus/influence or putting your own kids (adopted or not) in the throne instead of renaming random people
@@DiocletianLarius Sure, I don't know if they can make as big system as CK 3 or something. But Being able to push marriages in their subjects etc. Needs to be a thing.
Factions could be made a lot cooler, even though how they work now is pretty decent, they're more of a system you can only indirectly interact with that can clash with your gameplay desires.
Congrats, both for the engagement during the open beta and for having modders help with the patchwork (plus bonus points for immortalising said modders).
For all the highs and lows of Stellaris, it's rare to see the developers behind such a big game be so consistently involved with their community's humour and feedback alike as you are. Major props for that.
Guys if you want to help new players you need to put a tutorial for this game. It is SO hard to get into. I see a lot of people just giving up either IRL or online, it's disheartening.
Their Flesh is Weak. You can learn stellaris purely by watching CZcams. But a lot.
@@lefty59th18A lot of players won't have the reflex to go look for youtube tutorials (or even won't have them in their native language). They'll just try the game, find it impenetrable, and move on. And that's a damned shame.
@@gargamellenoir8460 Yes, for these players that's true. But why would you like to have (force?) lot of players in stellaris who can't even understand tutorials? I mean, you are right that the ingame tutorial is very weak and basic, but maybe it's just not the game for everyone? Even after a few years of playing I still need to look after what's what, because of the constant overhauls. That means lot of youtube time.
@@lefty59th18"force"? What the fuck do you mean "force"?
And the idea that if a game refuses to explain its complicated rules for you then it's just not for you is ludicrous and vaguely gatekeeping. I have personally shown the ropes to friends and they love the game now. But not everyone has a living tutorial to help.
@@lefty59th18Defending laziness and incompetence of developers by sending new players to CZcams is stupid. But it's doubly stupid in case of Stellaris because developers are constantly messing with it. And that means that guides constantly become outdated. Meaning many of them are almost or completely useless by now, and a new player can't be certain the video he stumbled upon is still relevant. Hey, even when I stumble upon a video several months old often can't be certain if it is still relevant or not. And I know at least a little bit about Stellaris.
"Beep boop."
Thanks, Steven! Love you guys. Thank you for what you do.
Do you guys sell hoodies or merch? Been playing for a couple years now and I think it’s time to invest
Not the game director we deserve, but the game director we need 🖖
In the next update, this may be hard to add but there should be origins to be fallen empires or pre-FTL civs
Beep Boop!
It's time to start rolling some of that early DLC into the main Stellaris game. All the DLC
from 2017 and 2018 would go a long way.
Do we get some machine Empire Ships? :D
Is this coming to Consul?
yup! in a few years!
When the crusader, jihad or holy wars DLC? The Archeofuturist Players want that!!!
Thank god you guys fixed the typos! Finally the game is playable now
Eridan Ampora?
I would like to see more things that can be done in the Senate.
I would also like to see more opportunities for diplomacy with other empires.
can u guys pls rework the fallen empires or add more of them i feel like there so much great potential
Have to say, I really like the new exponential technology curve - as a technocracy, I was somewhat bored by killing the great khan with tier-3-disruptors. Now there is something to look forward to.
I hope they fix the damn bug that makes the game slow down after playing for a while
Time to come back
fingers crossed for new endgame crisis
I'd rather go into the high seas if the option is a Live Service and thats coming from someone who has all the DLC.
Honestly i just dislike the fact that you have to expand wide in order to get Excavation Site and even The Astral Rift in some case.
The tall play style simply no longer work.
I very much dislike the tech changes. This recent update has been the least fun I've had while playing vanilla stellaris in a long time. I shudder to think how this new pacing is going to affect mods that add content to the endgame like Gigastructures. The combination of generally less effective leaders and slower science makes it painful. The direction Stellaris has been heading these past few updates with all the nerfs, intentional or not, is not fun.
Even if you play on 1x tech cost settings and on the lowest difficulty, making the tech cost 'like 3.10' You are still generating less science due to the scientist nerfs so things are still slower.
😊😊😊
Officials are not working in the Galactic Community.
where new dlc
You could just lower the prices of the DLC. That would also make it more accessible to more players. But that's less profitable isn't it?
Correct, it would be less profitable. And you are under no obligation to purchase it.
They do have sales every 3 months or so. It's very HEAVY to buy everything. But not really that problem if you buy it in 2 or 3 months.
In Brazil each DLC costs $49 insanity @@billsmith-hl8rk
Flush out rebellions and internal conflict
It's a real steamer of an update
Wish you hadn't hit tech with the increase cost and the nerf to science output.
Dont understand why you want to slow the game down, let people play the way they want. Dissapointing update tbh.
The game has power crept way too much and lost a lot of the fun epic experience the game used to have when it was slower (in my humble opinion). Some players like myself want to have 10+ hour games. Some however do prefer the faster gameplay, so the best part is with the galaxy sliders you can remove the tech scaling, and then reduce tech costs by 25% to make up for the researcher nerfs, and suddenly the game will play almost exactly as before. This patch was amazing for both players who want the slower gameplay and those who want to adjust the game back to the fast style.
@@Nightstalker565 I played with sliders a lot so far, and haven’t found the right balance, the removal of tech speed bonuses is a hard nerf, plus the changes to certain traditions. I just think it was too much in one patch. I can appreciate your point, I remember when they changed the empire size/tech costs in 1.0 (one planet challenge) was the rage, that needed changing, but this feels to much.
@@JohnnyCash-tw8psIt was necessary, before this patch I could develop every tech before 2300. No crisis, no fallen empire and no great Khan could compete against that. And also the amount of ships in the galaxy made the game so much laggy too soon. If anything I’d say that they should add an Empire Size modifier slide bar to double it up.
Bold of you to assume everyone wants to play the game the same way you do.
A lot of us (though certainly not all of us) would actually like to be getting new techs throughout the game, rather than maxing out in the mid-game and leaving no new stuff to unlock in a stagnant late-game.
Having crises and awakened empires be a consistent threat rather than a consistent pushover sounds nice too.
"if you get 1400 pops on an ecusort, you deserve to break the game with an ecusort" -quote from stellaris devs.
then reworks resort world PURELY because of the ecusort (specifically making relic worlds unable to be used, even though personally id LOVE to take a vacation to a ancient historic site (almost like taking a vacation to Egypt or Greece)
I gave the benefit of the doubt and listened entirely to the video. A subscription model for this genre of game, is entirely absurdly inappropriate and wrong! The game loop vs the dlc model is wrong and bad and horrible and terrible and bad again. This always online buy me buy me DLC and Sub, however shoe-in, is still a terrible signal for PR, and consumer confidence. Yes its optional and who cares, its not the point, the point is, its activision levels of loot crate bad, see those examples. For a game that has had 0 ZERO!!!! ZERO!!!! Game loop improvements! All the patch and the DLC does is jumble up the patch notes and obfuscate! CIA levels of manipulation. I'll end with DO NOT GIVE THESE GUYS MONEY UNTIL THEY FIX THE >>>GAME-LOOP!!!!!
Solution: is a giant and i mean giant fixed expansion and a sorry for the crappy greed!
You realise they're not removing the other way to buy the DLCs right? They're just lowering the entry fee to give a "try before you buy" option. But it sounds like you'd rather stay mad at Stellaris than play a different game that you actually enjoy.
@@Xeridanus no, my main point is how company greed over-rides company vision, or creative vision. See: Game-loop. Game-loop is my gripe. I really doubt the devs in the game like what their doing.
Im going through Stellaris current build now, and I see 0 sign of any new feature, just obfuscated patch logics. Notice at 0:38 he said 'now that we have appeased the marketing overlords' that tells me he hates it.
@@adc2000974You don't like the gameplay loop (I assume, you're being really vague here) and want constant new features. Some players complained that the devs were bringing out new patches without fixing any bugs. They can't make everyone happy. But you can make yourself happy. Try to do that.
Redo or remove the leader features from Galactic Paragons. It has destroyed the game.
lol
Rollback your game version if it's an issue for you. Galactic Paragons is one of the best DLCs Paradox came up with for the game since Utopia.
Take this from someone who is not the least bit interested in what Galactic Paragons does to the game (i.e. overcomplicating the leader system):
It's not a big deal, you can just choose switch it off or not buy it in the first place.
@@finaldusk1821 That won't help. Starting with the Federations DLC Paradox began to employ the scammy tactic of forcing DLC mechanics into the base game but in a very underdeveloped state. And you have to pay them for the DLC if do not want to feel as if you are playing an alpha version. The Paragons DLC is the most egregious example of this as all the bad things brought by it are forced on every player but everything good (or at least everything that makes the changes less bad) is hidden behind a paywall. The only way to avoid it is to play the version of the game that came out before the DLC. And that means forgoing any future bug fixes, performance improvements, etc. Not to mention not every player is able to make that choice in the first place.
@@finaldusk1821 Not true the galactic paragon features mainly came in the update that came with ther DLC you cannot just turn it off