#13 David Spergel - NASA UAP Taskforce, Dark Matter, Hubble Tension, Leadership
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 05. 2024
- In this week's episode, David is joined by Dave Spergel, Professor of Astrophysics, Chair of the NASA UAP Taskforce and President of the Simons Foundation. Dr Spergel has been a prominent leader in the field of cosmology, both intellectually and strategically.
To support this podcast and our research lab, head to www.coolworldslab.com/support
NASA UAP Report: smd-cms.nasa.gov/wp-content/u...
Video briefing: czcams.com/users/livebQo08JRY...
You can listen to this podcast on...
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/39vEInH...
iTunes: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Amazon Music: music.amazon.com/podcasts/dd2...
iHeart Radio: iheart.com/podcast/116477298
Tune-in: tunein.com/radio/Cool-Worlds-...
Player FM: player.fm/series/3482219
Boomplay Now: www.boomplaymusic.com/podcast...
Podchaser Now: www.podchaser.com/podcasts/co...
And of course right here on CZcams!
Cool Worlds Podcast Theme by Hill [open.spotify.com/artist/1hdkv...]
The President of your institution is.... not worthy. That's the nicest I can say about that. This conversation, on the other hand, absolutely worthy of my time! Thanks for these interviews, Dr. Kipping.
I would call this factually incorrect as it fails to describe the enormity of the failure as it is not the failure of an individual but the whole system.
I don’t understand why NASA has this UAP taskforce when there is a program already set up called AARO. Both groups by the way do not have clearance or access to classified information .. eg sensor data .. sensitive military information. This renders their existence pointless in examining and resolving the cases that matter eg .. tic tac etc. The tic tac event was completely ignored by AARO in it’s recent report. I also think that both these groups quite happily tell us about misrepresented cases but never delve into problematic events they can’t resolve leading all in sundry ( including mainstream media ) to wrongly conclude that the phenomenon doesn’t exist or pose a problem to national security.
Well then it *comes* to UAPs, I'm all for many different groups studying the phenomena. If nothing else, the military is *obviously* constrained from revealing what our tech as deployed is capable of. And they should be, mostly cause very mundane bad guys are out there. On the other hand, a lot of science geeks can look without spilling a single secret. I think that's good.
Dr. Kirkpatrick failed to commission a peer review report regarding the Nimitz encounter. A heavily redacted peer review report would resolve the debate. The U.S. military stopped a training exercise to investigate. The U.S. military captured the data from multiple platforms. Disclosure of the objects performance would not violate national security interest. The object in question was not a U.S. asset. Nothing screams fraud like Dr. Kirkpatrick blatant disregard for scientific analysis of the data.
Redundancy is precisely why multiple independent groups should exist.
You don’t need classified data to prove or disprove the existence of higher order intelligence UAP. Really powerful sensors and systems are available to the public. We need more Galileo Projects.
Because it’s obviously an attempt to wash from both angles. They shamelessly ignore all the things they said they weren’t and handwave everything they said they wouldn’t . Kirkpatrick provably lied recently saying he had nothing to do with anything UAP or spooky stuff at all before AARO and then it was shown he was at the head of the table of a 2.5 hour presentation on SkinWalkerRanch. Amazing. The best evidence of UAP’s and UFO’s being real is increasingly how guilty the government are behaving towards it.
Hell yeah, new podcast. Love your work Dr Kipping ❤. Sending love from Poland ♥️🇵🇱
The UAP topic does seem polarising but please don’t forget those of us somewhere in the middle with open minds but still skeptical simply asking the question: what is that? I think it is worthwhile to investigate the truly anomalous incidents.
I've said it before but I think David Fravor's take on it is actually spot on. In the congressional hearing he said that he's just a pilot, he has no idea what's up. He just thinks someone should probably get to the bottom of it. It's pretty hard to argue with that stance. I think that if scientists like Sagan have taught the world anything it's that its never bad to be curious about something
It was disappointing to see the way NASA handled this topic. UAP exist and documents from as early as 1947 state that as a fact. There is plenty of nasa footage showing anomalous activity that wasn’t even covered. Unfortunately, AARO is a disinformation campaign that did a great job of pretending to explain anyway everything. Just another swamp gas explanation. Private scientific research will be the only way forward. We’re not going to get a fair analysis or straight answer from NASA or any portion of the US department on defence. Optics may explain some things but this was not an honest assessment. Naming Mick West as anything other than someone who has a motive to discredit.
@@Erikaaaaaaaaaaaaa I appreciate Grave’s approach to the subject as well. He’s defined a simple objective and pursued it rigorously. He’s taken an abundance of caution to ensure he doesn’t sway from this simple objective with flashier things like the Nazca mummies, or many of the wild theories touted as fact amongst the UFO community. His objective is to raise awareness for genuine unknowns violating American airspace, and to get both commercial and military aviation to take it more seriously.
I am sorry for all the unrest in the political climate right now, i truly feel for everyone affected by whats going on with gaza and Israel. BUT, this is a scientific content channel and he is a scientist! This is not a forum for politics or his personal opinions!! Why does everyone feel the need to shove their opinions down others throats! Im here for science content and if i want a political debate I'll go to a channel that is focused on that for their content! Stop condemning him for addressing it in a neutral and brief manner when that was what was appropriate for a science channel. If he had gotten into it and expressed his personal opinions on the situation it would have opened up an attack from the opposition! As well as having all of you that tried to shame him, coming into the comments to make it a debate. Let me enjoy my science content on my science content channel!! Save your political opinions for the political channels and leave us out of it please? Thank you!
I could not agree more with your statement. One person can't do it all and shouldn't be expected too.
So interesting! As usual! I'm so glad I found this channel! It's an undiscovered gem!
3rd way to find a needle in the haystack: You know the needle has a high temp melting point and the hay has a low temp burning point. Burn the hay. The needle is now easily findable.
4th way: You learn the needle is a ferromagnetic material. You spread the haystack thin, run a magnet over it.
5th way: Take a "roll in the hay", suitably unclothed. Needle will be found.
Stay tuned for more methods. Real world dichotomies (There are 2 ways, implying ONLY 2 ways) are rarely as limiting as our perception.
A vhf metal detector with a tiny coil and all metal tone threshold mode can find it. The ones designed for gold with pulse induction can find it even faster.
Yes and yes
the thing is the official uap report already addressed personal testimony.... there is no data confirming abnormal abilities of unknown objects ....and in the very few cases where observers find the objects interesting there is no way to eliminate misinterpretation of what they saw
Good to see you're OK.
The spirit of Edward Condon lives on in this one. . . .
Thanks for this post. Excellent watch.
Ah cool. I didn’t realize you had another CZcams channel! Happy to subscribe and help this grow. Appreciate all the work you do across your channels, and love these long form conversations in particular!
Great thanks to both of you for this.
Great conversation.
Nothing gets me more excited than your uploads Dr. Kipping! Appreciate all the work you do and SHARE with us all! Much love!
Never A Straight Answer. WE are open, we don't disclose secrets... cutting the argument both ways...
The Frankfurt School ideological import of the 50s/60s has been devastating to our institutions of higher learning. I'm not sure it's salvageable at this point. I'm rooting for the sciences to pull through, but the consequences to medicine are already being felt. Our leadership class has largely succumbed to narratives antithetical to cooperative flourishing. I wish I could be more optimistic, but we're in big trouble in my view.
I'm a surgeon and researcher. You mentioned medicine. Please elaborate or guide towards related material
I had not heard about this taskforce so thanks for sharing this conversation it was insightful and the one of the few talks about UAPs that make any sense to me. The current events will sort themselves out as those things do with time and open discussion but I appreciate you acknowledging what is happening. Great conversation!
The burden to confirm UAP is so overwhelming by this gentlemen is that it cannot ever be established. If there are "any" that can't be explained, they should be emphasized and focused on, as opposed to marginalizing and saying, well we can explain most things. Whatever is unexplained, and is an aerial phenomena, is by definition a UAP. You could just as easily conclude here: confirmed! UAPs identified!
I love this guy, and loved this interview..great stuff... even though he looks like a Bond villain... keep up the solid podcast !
Science is beautiful. They inadvertently confirmed that cats are indeed liquid! 59:02
Dr No blends in with the back wall a treat lol
Serious note, great podcast with interesting content 👌
I think its David's accent. Makes the request for uap discoveries sound like something that is precious to his research. Ngaw so many people have collections of photographs with strange objects, orbs and plastic bag balloons but they dont really see any point in taking it further... probably because it doesn't directly effect them negatively or impact their lives in a life threatening way. This was an interesting topic. Thanks!
@coolworldspodcast DR kipping, first off, a big hi from New Zealand, I find your videos absolutely fascinating when you narrate them it draws me in like I'm spellbound and can imagine myself there, I love the topics and always look forward to the next installment. just wondering what your take is on Terrence Howards claim and if he's right what would some of the implications be? thanks tim
Send love and light and open arms to our brothers from other realms in the universe. ❤ Nothing to fear.
IMO
Would love to see Dr. Steven Greer on the show 🌎
How did I only now discover your podcast ? You need to mention it more maybe ?? Cheers
you seriously must have been living in a cave LOL
I just found it myself yesterday and I listen/watch his main channel all the time. I don't ever remember hearing him promote it in his other videos but I could be misremembering.
@@user-mb9zx9lg7pWell aren't you just a peach...
The UAP Disclosure Act (UAPDA) was stripped down to 24 pages but has been reintroduced by Congressman Robert Garcia of California. Contact your Senator now and demand that the UAPDA be passed in it's full form. We, the people, must reclaim control over our government and demand transparency.
Id recommend chapters for ur videos!
Yes! I'd like to skip past the UFO canard.
I see UAP’s with lights every night. I have confirmed they are not aircraft or drones. Also when you look at them with binoculars they appear as a mutating string of colored lights. When viewed with night vision they appear as a fuzzy orb.
They didnt see anything classified. Limited data.
Was there not a time in history not so long ago where pilots were forbidden by law from reporting the sighting of a UFO?
Good evening, how are you? My name is Pedro Nazareth, I'm from Brazil, yesterday at around 22:30 05/08/24, returning home I saw a strange object that was spinning and had a very strong light, I took some photos, I believe they are very good photos that may have some value, as there are about 3 photos that, given the zoom, appear to have a creature inside. If you are interested, I look forward to hearing from you.
Public Meeting on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (Official NASA Broadcast): czcams.com/video/bQo08JRY0iM/video.html
"New people learn in new ways."
Profoundly True, and that's what is Bio-logically the consequence of "It's always NOW" everywhere-when pulse-evolution.
What, how and why inside-outside holographic presence is Panspermia.
UAP are the parallel convergence representation of defensive strategy that is the logical outcome of competitive sense-in-common cause-effect connection. (Don't believe me, think/observe for your holistic Self)
Something weak about the argument regarding us forces not able to investigate UAPs is if a fighter pilot see something weird while flying a local mission then that weird object potencially is an air space invasion and it should be investigated immediatly
I think you'd get more views if you just put this on the main channel
Dr. Kipping, I watched that entire 4 hour NASA press conference. I specifically remember the part at 2 hours, 5 minutes, and 30 seconds where your former collaborator Dr. Nadia Drake said this, speaking on behalf of the entire NASA panel: "Recently many credible witnesses have reported seeing unidentified objects in the sky, some of which are behaving rather peculiarly. In some instances, these reports include corroborating data from various instruments/sensors. The challenge we have is that the data needed to explain these anomalous sightings do not exist or are incomplete for generating a conclusive analysis."
This is a subtle point, but I think you can see the obvious issue: There is no requirement in science that a definitive conclusion or explanation follow an observation. Are you at all curious why this standard exists for this topic? Can you imagine a similar situation where NASA didn't release information about a biosignature related molecule in an exoatmosphere because they couldn't definitively explain it?
From your general trend of comments on this topic over time, this isn't surprising to me, but I still enjoy your channel and content, and hold out hope you will genuinely engage this idea with a fair and open minded perspective.
I think you could have possible evidence of a biosignature (we’ve had them already) that would be greeted with much fanfare and skepticism in equal measure. You could have strong evidence for a biosignature that could be completely convincing, but that’s not the same thing as life. There are many abiotic processes that could produce biosignatures too. So coming back to UAPs, you can have good evidence that someone saw something unidentified, no doubt, but that’s a large distance from speaking to evidence for aliens, just as with biosignatures. In fact it’s even worse because we understand our atmosphere quite poorly, as the red sprites example demonstrates.
@@CoolWorldsPodcast I bet we agree that the skepticism and fanfare are both healthy for the scientific process. But I still don't see an answer as to why NASA can't be forthcoming with the evidence from credible witnesses with corroborating sensor data until they reach a definitive conclusion. I would very much like to hear Dr. Nadia Drake's perspective on this as well. The million dollar question is if the "large distance from speaking to evidence for aliens" is larger because they decide not to publish.
An exploration on the criteria involved in these statements such as "conclusive analysis" would go a long ways towards elevating the discourse, and you've touched on the topic a few times recently. I hope you consider making a video about it.
@@CoolWorldsPodcast I believe we would both agree that fanfare and skepticism can be healthy to the scientific process. This discussion can happen because the results are published for everyone to see, often without the inclusion of "conclusive analysis." So why should the UAP topic be held to a different standard? I would very much like to hear Dr. Nadia Drake's perspective on what she said. If, as you say, there's a "large distance from speaking to evidence for aliens" - do you find that distance is increased by not publishing and asking us to trust that they have credible reports with corroborating sensor data?
@@CoolWorldsPodcast My comment has disappeared twice now trying to reply. I don't think it's a controversial reply, so I will try once more: I believe we would both agree that fanfare and skepticism can be healthy to the scientific process. This discussion can happen because the results are published for everyone to see, often without the inclusion of "conclusive analysis." So why should the UAP topic be held to a different standard? I would very much like to hear Dr. Nadia Drake's perspective on what she said. If, as you say, there's a "large distance from speaking to evidence for aliens" - do you find that distance is increased by not publishing and asking us to trust that they have credible reports with corroborating sensor data?
@@slysynthetic All claims pertaining to possible to life in the universe are held to a very high degree of skepticism because 1) there have been many spurious claims previously (Martian canals is a personal favourite) and 2) it's arguably the most important scientific discovery of all time. It warrants great due diligence. But overall I think we both agree this question is very interesting and deserves further attention!
Any kind of protests isn't automatically right. Or wrong. It all comes down to what you believe is true and righteous. A man or a woman of science will know this. After all, they are trained in seeing the objective, unemotional reality.
One person's "freedom fighter" is another person's "terrorist". It's a tale as old as civilization.
On the UAP subject he kind of just gave you the jedi mind trick wave of the hand these arent the droids you are looking for spheel....i watched an interview with Charles Buhler (NASA engineer) a few months back where his team has had break throughs recently (2021-2024) on a project that they have been working on for over a decade concerning propellantless propultion...if you look back at the work it is based off of in the 20s you will see the protitype sketches resemble modern day (40s-2000) disk type ufos...couldnt he have just said that.?.
He says he has discovered a new fundamental force. That is an extraordinary claim, and so requires extraordinary evidence. So far he has provided only questionable evidence.
I don't see a connection with the current video, even though the guest is very much on the woo-woo side.
@@AndrewBlucher i was just pointing out that he could mention stuff that isnt secret or classified such as Buhlers work and others work that maybe could be mistaken for strange things ....kind of tired of the whole theres nothing to see here move along smug attitudes these guys have in their 10,000 dollar outfits....maybe they have been in a bubble too long
@@darthjarwood7943 Bud, it sounds like you’ve been in the UFO community bubble for too long. You’re speaking nonsense and the only reason you’re tired is because you’re obsessing over a subject with very minimal evidence that isn’t anomalous, and you’re hoping/expecting other people to resolve the topic for you. Then you lash out when people fail to do so. It’s just weird, dude.
NASA just announced that we are five years away from being an indertiminate multiple of five year periods away from being five years away from returning to the Moon.
I'm very excited.
Commenting before watching. I hold the position that of course there are unidentified flying objects, after all they are unidentified. Equally, they are of Earthly origin. Irrationally unscientific of me.
Do optical flares / Ghosts jam your sophisticated, state of the art radar? No
I think it is a miss-nomer to call the tic-tac phenomenon an "event", simply because military personnel see this every day.
I think the fact that all the talk is about what the Navy knows is the point of what is going on. The Navy has no clue because the Air Force made them and never told them, US military branches do not tell each other what secrat projects they are working on. If you never ask the branch actually responsible, no one has to lie on camera when they say they have no clue. It is a way to spread confusion, legally.
But classified materials have been released throughout the decades. General Vandenberg famously contemplated that our biggest crisis was figuring/dealing with UFOs. "Seeing is Believing" by Peter Jennings and team, tell the history best imo. The first team dedicated to studying UFOs went to leadership and said "yes, these things are real" lol leadership said welp we can't tell the public. Nowadays the media lets authors who have studied as much leave these big revelations for these cats' book climax, but don't get it twisted, the corroboration is there. You just have to do some deductive analysis. And it's obvious why they haven't made their presence noted, because they would be responsible for changing humanity's plight. How is this < a provocative statement? It's not and totally reasonable and is why Gene (Rodenberry) pontificated that this was how they'd roll (aliens). The numbers alone don't lie. 14ish billion years this good ole universe has been thriving and we've been here for 300k of it (ish). The biggest fallacy humans can make is thinking they are unique in this biggest thing we know, the universe. Thanks for all the hard work Cool Worlds o7 < I salute you
i hate the scientific industrial complex. but i like the guest. his examples actually made me laugh. that’s a brilliant scientist 👨🔬 🥂✅💝
Umm, what are you talking about that happened regarding astronomy and how is a hedge fund guy supposed to help credibility about it?
Best podcast. Prof K is the bollocks!
Youre misusing the word bollocks
No mate … it’s the correct use 🏴
@@LB-qu2oq what a load of bollocks
If you’re interested… the term the dog’s bollocks means something that is awesome.
I apologise if your limited experience failed you.
Here’s another use …
You dropped a bollock!
@@LB-qu2oq the actual definition of something "totally bollocks" is "something that is downright terrible or even completely untrue " not me saying it... dogs bollocks is an intended compliment but ya didn't say that now did ya laddie? Oh ,only if youre interested...
I find the Prof. Spergel's evaluation of MOND (around 27:00) really hard to swallow. Sure, MOND doesn't predict lensing, microwave background, etc., but Einstein's GR doesn't predict, e.g., the flattening of rotation curves, or violation of Bell's inequality or quantum tunneling... It never anticipated any of those. While I'm not an astrophysicist, I gather that MOND has some really nice success with just one free parameter (something Prof. spergel upholds while discussing the Lambda-CDM). Sure, we would all love to have a single theory covering all known physics but .... Secondly, the failure of ST Gravity, the suggested generalization of MOND seems like a strawman argument against MOND to me? Does ST Gravity fail in the MONDian regme? The most relevant argument against MOND seems to be its claimed failure for XRay clusters.
We live in a 4k world and all they can ever show are some grainy film and a handful of quotes from a 'security personnel'... Until a physicist comes out and says something definitive, I'm very suspect of it all.
Please have Terrance Howard on and debate some of his ideas.
The
Is this the same guy who makes Astrum, sounds like the same.
That’s funny, I’ve always thought they sounded similar, but it’s a different person that narrates astrum. The name is escaping me but I think you can look at astrums about information and you can see the name of the narrator.
@@ericgraham8150 You're both thinking of Alex McColgan aka Astrum.
I just wished the head of the UAP task force had an experience of his own, he’d look at it from the angle most of us would like him too. He said if it emits a light then it’s ruled as an airplane, then explain the blue orb that illuminated the inside of my car for 10 seconds, it was the size of a football and definitely not a plane. I’m not hating on him, I would just like him to be a little more open minded. Millions of people throughout the years have experienced something from sightings to abductions, even crop circles, there’s so much to look into to get the bigger picture.
Ball lightning
@@KittyKat17985I thought the same, and it could of been. But this thing stayed with me as I drove 50mph up a dark mountain road, then zipped past my windscreen missing it by inches. Imo it moved intelligently, I just wished I had pulled the car over afterwards.
@@TheDirtyClown I've experienced it twice, one time one entered my home through the exterior wall then bounced around knocking pictures off of interior walls then flew through an exterior wall exiting the home. They definitely are strange and mysterious. I still don't understand how it went through some walls and bounced off of others. No markings on anything it touched either. Slightly larger than a basketball and the color of lightning.
That sounds incredible, and to experience it twice sounds unreal and maybe not a coincidence. And to leave no marks on the walls is insane, it sounds like the same thing I saw, size of a basketball and colour of a police siren. Did yours light up the room? Have you had any other strange experiences?
I can't get past the sensitivity of the microphone picking up every small noise his mouth is making whilst talking.
there are more than a handful of publicly available of UAP reports from military pilots of their radar being jammed by UAP’s, when the pilots were trying to “paint” or lock onto the UAP. For the military, electronic jamming is considered an act of war. why isn’t David S. talking about these unexplained events?
If Larry Lawton never went to prison
The biggest problem with studying UAP is that the intelligence behind them is superior to ours.
and someone like this who states the obvious about flashing lights I have no time for people like this on that subject
Does the universe care about our ridiculous racial squabbles?
well seeing how we are the universe looking back at itself, yes in a way it does
that being said TKD
Does the universe care about anything?
The main concern with the 'new' UAP stuff is the probability of it being a distraction technique for something much more worthy of all our attention. Our governments are that cynical it makes it more likely to be misinformation than a first contact, which is a sad indicator of where our civilization stands.
Agreed... everything is a distraction, without getting into politics or specifics we are watching the fall of our nation from within.
I can appreciate the line of thought, but logically it doesn't bear fruit. The US Government gains nothing positive from having this topic in the limelight. What it does gain, is a rabid community of sleuths poring over declassified documents from around the globe, ferrying out jnformation they should not have. UAP isn't a distraction, it's a national security risk for information best not brought to.light.
The best misinformation isn't totally fabricated, it's a combination of real and fake or twisted information. At this point there's definitely something technological here and out of the ordinary, regardless of origin. Can that be used or twisted for nefarious purposes? Certainly.
The problem is the college Administration is weak.
This UAP Task force, interesting name choice - why name it the same thing as the DoD program which David Grusch was part of. An intelligence officer from the NRO has seen all the classified stuff. This seems like a blatant attempt to muddy the waters.
Lost me after “we don’t look at eye witnesses data”. Sorry
Eyewitness testimony has been proven many times over to be unreliable at best.
Very difficult to see a path forward to ingesting personal testimony into scientific discussions of the objective reality of phenomena. Without control studies and measurable false positive/true positive rates, the nature of the claims falls short of scientific standards of evidence.
@@CoolWorldsPodcast a failure of the scientific method then. Experience is disqualifying? Ridiculous no?
@rossmcleod7983 A method is not flawed just because it gives you answers you don't like. Let's say we 100 % believe those testimonies. Pilots saw things they were unable to explain or identify. Woohoo. And now what? How does that help us to identify and explain those phenomena? Like it or not, the only way forward is to gather solid data.
@@simonklein4687 “woohoo” ??? You just demonstrated the arrogance, blindness and stupidity of your beloved scientific method. Tell me again what the remaining 95% of the universe is made of and how are my rich and extraordinary dreams and lived experience quantified, measured and valued in your world?
Your opening comments are disappointing. I had expected a more enlightened attitude. However, the rest of the video is fine.
Lol diversity 🤣 😆 😂 😄 😅 🙄 🤣 😆 😂 😄 😅 🙄 🤣 😆 😂 😄 😅 🙄 🤣
FREE PALESTINE
pfft this interview is so disingenuous...
Could be, why?
What a load of crap
Centering the distress of faculty and admin rather than highlighting the actual underlying reason for the protests (institutional complicity in an ongoing genocide) is, frankly, disappointing. You acknowledge the "enormous pain" within the academic community, but where is the support for students who are risking so much to stand up for what they believe in? The condemnation of the blatant use of state-sponsored police brutality and suppression of free speech? Think about how you would have responded to the campus protests against the Vietnam war, to the civil rights movement, or the "war on terror". This is not the time for "enlightened centrism", these are issues that require moral clarity.
Exactly this
This podcast episode not the place for that. I respect that he is only briefly commenting on his personal experience & acknowledging the current events. More can be said later in a dedicated video.
These types of protests should have no place in an University. War has nothing to do with Education. Why not protest in a zoo?
There are plenty of other podcasts and CZcams’s dedicated to this subject. It’s not really fair to expect dr. Kipping to unpack this polarizing highly charged issue in a podcast dedicated to science.
if you cannot be civil when protesting, fuck off .
I love your work and channel but i still want to say: FREEDOM AND JUSTICE FOR PALESTINE 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸❤️🇵🇰
Be quiet please... not in here man! 🙄
@@lukew4127 OK, Won't discuss further here but only this, a genocide is a genocide and many who support the perpetrators are in high positions in academia where the research discussed here was done
It's disgusting
Columbia is experiencing the most violent outburst of antisemitism among student and faculty alike. Hosting a Jewish-American scientist such as David at this time without mentioning the current situation in Columbia seems shady.
Did oyu even view this? he said it was record two weeks ago before anything on columbia happend
LMAO karen alert
The video is over an hour long and was only posted less than half an hour ago so you obviously haven’t even watched it 😂😂
Embarrassing
I discuss the situation at the start of the video
Correct on the first point, the people *conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism* are being deeply antisemitic. As if all Jewish people support the Netanyahu coalition, a sentiment shared with and espoused by neonazis... Cracking the heads of peaceful anti-war activists.😞
If you don’t condemn genocide - you condone it.
One would hope that you of all people would be aware of such an inherent truth Professor Kipping. I will not hide my disappointment with your ignorant and inconsiderate statement in regards to the brave and moral student protesters across the country (and soon the WORLD) and I will not be giving this episode the usual “like” of approval which I normally would. I sincerely hope it was Columbia who put you up to this and that it wasn’t done of your own accord - which in someways actually makes it worse and even more unacceptable. You are better than this Professor, so please, BE better. #FreePalestine 🇵🇸🙏
From the opening statement on the crushing of free speech that said NOTHING! To the conversation that said nothing. This is by far the least interesting and useful video from this channel.
The UAP Disclosure Act (UAPDA) was stripped down to 24 pages but has been reintroduced by Congressman Robert Garcia of California. Contact your Senator now and demand that the UAPDA be passed in it's full form. We, the people, must reclaim control over our government and demand transparency. "Citizens For Disclosure"