Man City Fan INSISTS The Club's Success Is NOT Down To Money But Manager Pep Guardiola đ | talkSPORT
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 13. 05. 2024
- Manchester City fan reveals why they do not think the club's success is down to the amount of money they have spent but their manager Pep Guardiola.
Subscribe: / talksport
Enjoyed this CZcams video? đ
đ„ïž talkSPORT's Website: talksport.com/
đČ talkSPORT's Twitter: / talksport
đ· talkSPORT's Instagram: talksport?...
đ€ talkSPORT's Facebook: / talksport
đ± talkSPORT's Tik Tok: / talksport
đŽ Download the talkSPORT app HERE! - talksport.com/apps/
đ Want to see if you feature on our CZcams channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: âą The BEST talkSPORT Cal...
#talkSPORT
#premierleague
#manchestercity
#pepguardiola - Sport
Interesting how it's always the teams that spend the most money that say "it's not about money"
Because they're the ones that are acused of that đđ smart ass
- Utd outspent City
- If it's all down to Money
- Utd should be winning more than City,no?
@@HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings Nobody really cares about either of the teams. Just sensationalism, news paper fodder and billions of pounds thrown around like its paper. Off to super league and matches in Singapore and LA.
â@@HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings typical city goof mentioning united đ
@@HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings city spent 422m on wages, united 200m, liverpool 140, arsenal 180m
so what you say about that?
Itâs not about the money âweâre paying the biggest manager salary in the worldâ đđ
Isn't Simione the highest paid Manager?đ€Ł
Pep deserves his money. Nothing wrong with paying a man what he's worth. It's called being a good employer
Fergie was the highest paid in prem lge in his time.
Then Mourinho and recently klopp was paid the highest salary in lfc history.
Actually they don't. Believe it or not, Diego Simeone at Atletico is getting paid the most in Europe by far lol
@@HumanBeingsRThinkingBeingsi thought that by a clear margin as well double pep apparently
City's success is down to Pep? Didn't City start winning trophies under Mancini, then Pellegrini? Without, their Billionaire owners, the only titles City would be winning is the League Two and One titles.
Like 3 in a row ? Don't think so
We won the lottery but utd have spent more. And Chelsea . Arsenal since Arteta.
@@marvinbrando722 Without your owners, City would still be 50+ years without a Title. Not entirely true...they'd still have the "Noisy neighbours" title.
@@garywallace5602hhhaaa spot on lol
Funny how when they had hardly any money they didnât win a thing and were relegated a few divisions. Now they have money they win everything. Must just be a coincidence đ
They now have pep though and won a treble but previous managers with all the money didn't win a treble. Yes they won trophies but none have been as successful as pep. And I'm not a city fan.
@i.m pep has only ever managed the 3 richest clubs in spain, germany and EnglandâŠ.
Fact!
Klopp isnt about money!
It took pep.around.6 years to do that none of the other manager were there as long â@@i.m1981
@@docholiday-lm4vf klopp isn't about money... Spends half a billion on his Liverpool team đđđđđđđđđ
@@docholiday-lm4vf klopp has spent loads đđđđđđđ
Would city get pep without money? Debate solved
And all those world class players as well.
But would any other team?
What club does? Like it or not Man City have always been a working class team, before the investment they had the same amount of European trophies that Arsenal still have and no elite club in the world has stayed truly and utterly organic. Didn't United buy the best in 90s? Liverpool in the 80s? Haven't Madrid always gone for the best? 99% of the elite teams poach other great players. People will complain about City but not support their local team and if Pep or any of these top players are so charitable why don't they go play for the little teams out the kindness of their heart.
Just like all other teamsđ€Ąâ@@thisricardopalma
Would the biggest clubs in the world be were they are without money.
Why is the first caller only going back 5 years? Lets go back 10 years and look at the spending.
Agreed, Remember them buying Robinho đ
â@Rob-hy8vb or the three or four years of spending 50 mil on defenders, who didn't work out then just replacing them the next year with more 50 mil defenders. Other clubs would have to eat those mistakes, but city just bought more solutions.
Pep is a money manger......look at the clubs his been at ....man city is a money team....but i have no problems with any of that...my point is this ...pep would not be able to win the league or champ league if his team was on a budget....thats why i ALWAYS say jose is a better manage then him (look what he did with Porto) .......pep is a hybrid manage and so is MAN city.........
did jose coach a second division team and won them a ucl
ManCheaty 115+ I call it plastic manufactured bought success
But Jose didn't win UCL with more rich teams. He shines as an underdog, not when managing the favorites.
â@@rrjgpl Roma booted that fraud out!
love how everyone conveniently forgets the doping allegations that follow Pep's squads throughout his career
100!
You only have to take one look at Haaland to know it's obvious....
It's amazing what can be achieved with ÂŁ2 billion spent. With a possible 115 allegations levied against the club including that of charges of financial irregularity! It's a real fairytale.
Seems like you crawled into this world yesterday...I'm no man city fan, but boy, you sound really dumb. Are you?
Cry hard
Notmanchester utd spent the same, difference is
422m wage bill ...
@@MrBrasserie yea never understood how notmanchester utd could afford that đ
It's sad that people forget United, Liverpool, Arsenal, and Chelsea spent to win trophies
All of them team earned their money đ° man city cheated
How did they "earn" their money? They never invested? It was organic was it?@@6figuregainz856
No where near that much city have had to spend before the money they was a mid table club at best đđđ
How many of those clubs where being invested for 100+ charges at the time of them winning?
Not chelseaâ@@6figuregainz856
Pep is a LEGEND no doubt!! When Man United usually spend loads of money to win the league .. nobody no pundits said it was money let them win .. they all have Alex Ferguson the glory.. PEP DESERVES HIS CREDIT
They donât break rules
Because the money came from winning trophies and global merchandising....remind me where City's money came from again??
@@discodave8412 kmt stop your f**kry!!! before Man United won they start spending.. they were the first club to start splash out big big money on players.. u people too BADMIND and GRUDGEFUL
@@rambochapman9844 it's not that.. Man united was the face of England and face of the Premier league afue .. they won't shame them like that.. but because Man City the blues take over Manchester and England they just want to cook something up so man ciry fall for united to rise again
City will see Simon in court.
Nobody is denying Pep is a world class coach and has created a fantastic team that City have at the moment.
Additionally nobody can deny the fact as well that Pep as a manager has now spent the most money on purchasing players in football history.
So what
And won the most trophies.
Pep might have been on a charity mission to Manchester and foregone his wages.
Lets be serious what they spent and what they REALLY spent is the 115 elephants in the roomđ„¶
50 million for Halland and the rest under the table
How much Chelsea , Liverpool , Manchester united and arsenal spent over the last 5yrs ?
Check the facts. They spent more than city and what they have to show for it ?
This club is 4ver tainted with 115 charges and bribery
Without Money Pep would be somewhere else. FACT
Without money and Messi, Guardiola would possibly just be another De Zerbi.
â@@jaysmith2858Messi?? đđđ€Łđ€Ł Where would Klopp be without Salah, Mane, Virgil, Fernino etc? See how stupid your point is?
The lack of any results in relation to Man City and its 115 charges are part of the reason why i no longer trust the EPL. All the contriversial VAR calls throughout this season has made it very clear that football is completely corrupt. We all witnessed the most Corrupt World Cup EVER. Football is no longer Legitimate sport. It's Entertainment !
It's buisness
I agree. City have had one really bad call against them that I can remember (and even that wasn't a goal). Arsenal have had several, including definite game changing decisions which were wrong.
If it wasnât for the money, City wouldnât be in the position they are now to have that manager and buy the players they have. They would NEVER have gotten to this position organically.
110% mate....this is the core of the issue. People defending Citeh are missing this KEY point
If they get found guilty, either their trophies needs asterisks plus relegation or they get stripped imo.
Man City's success is entirely down to money, namely how it has been allowed to be accrued and how it has been allowed to be used.
Take those things away and Man City would still be at best a mid table PL club.
I never thought i'd say this in a million years, bring on the Super League so we can have our League back.
How can a man city fan say it's not about the money with a straight face đđđ be proud of the fact you are a wealthy club, I don't understand this embarrassment surrounding wealth, all the best clubs are the ones who spend the most money!!!
Gone are the days clubs were successful using local youth players coming through their academies, doesn't work like that any longer. All about the cash. Even the academy prospects are bought in now days. đ€đ€đ€đ€
it's a mix of money and ambition and a good culture. Man United has money but a bad culture.
And Liverpool have ambition and good culture but no money đ
@@Rob-hy8vb "no money" wtf?
InshAllah city will win the league đđ
Grealish was a vital part of us winning the treble. He is a great player. Agree his end product has not been good enough but his ability to give control in a game was vital the previous season. He shouldn't have gone on a bender after the treble win. I think that is what has caused him problems this season.
Ofc it's not. You just have to take the look at Chelsea & United
Obviously money is a part of it, but it's not all of it. Money is something when it comes to winning. But it's not everything. Pep took players that anyone could have signed and turned them into amazing players. Leroy Sane cost ÂŁ37m. Ilkay Gundogan cost ÂŁ20m. Manu Akanji cost ÂŁ15m. Bernardo Silva cost ÂŁ44m. KDB cost ÂŁ55m. Kyle Walker cost ÂŁ50m. It isn't Man City's fault that Man United paid ÂŁ80m for Harry Maguire and ÂŁ73m for Jadon Sancho. ÂŁ70m for Casemiro and ÂŁ66m for Alexis Sanchez and none of those moves worked out. Chelsea spent ÂŁ1b and their best recent transfer was a player that Man City gave them. Liverpool spent a fraction of this and have won way more than Chelsea. Maybe just maybe the manager is more valuable than the money.
Middlesborough 8 - 1 Man City pre oil money
Dead rubber, Svens last game, qualified for Europe, was an anomaly.
Bad mind. Fox canât get the grape so he start to tell everyone that itâs sour
Money + wins = 'success', it can be done without as much money but it's a lot more difficult & some spend with no resultsđđ€«đđ„đ
Itâs not about City, give some to Bury and Rochdale then!!
đđđđđđđđ Pep first manager to spend 2 billion and now facing over 100 charges. Yeah nothing about money
Deluded. yes, Pep is one of the best managers around, but without the oil wealth, City would still be yoyo-ing between the Prem and Championship. Plus 115.
Money doesn't equal success and it's constantly shown that they spend less on players than the likes of Man U and Chelsea.
We spent big on Robinho and he was a flop.
United spent about 4mil on Evra and Vidic. Splashed on Pogba and he was a flop.
It's all about the right players in the right setting.
Any way you look at it, it is money. You can praise the manager all you want but it wouldn't be an issue if the amount wasn't spent
I'd be interested to see how 'Pep' does at a club which isn't the pinnacle of whatever league he's in already. Then we would see.
Man City was at the pinnacle when Pep arrived?
Itâs a bit of both pep wouldâve left if he didnât get tge investment he wanted but he needs to be able to dominate football like he wants to heâs brilliant at finding players and quickly shipping them out if it doesnât work
Itâs about cheating the system! 115 charges ..
I made this comment somewhere a while back but the oligarchs that bought Man City actually wanted United way back then because Utd were seen as the biggest team in the world (rightly or wrongly, that's a different topic) and then because the Glazers didn't want to sell, they went and bought their neighbours out of spite. Man City were minnows at best and would have remained mid league fodder without all the money and ergo, were it not for the success that money brought them, they would never have attracted a manager the calibre of Pep
Pep is not the highest paid manager it's the athletico Madrid is
You telling he would have gone there if they was still in league 1
All I'm going to say is name another club that has dominated a league going 4 league titles in a row, whilst having over 5 clubs outspending them over the past 5 years.
It's unheard of. look at Utd when they did the 3 in a row. They were outspending everyone in the league breaking 3 British transfer records in a single transfer window. And no clubs were even spending close to them.
Then you look at Bayern over the years buying every player from direct rivals whilst outspending with no one even spending close to it.
Then you look at PSG and Real Madrid currently. Both spending billions and competing to win the league against clubs like Girona that have a Netspend of ÂŁ5mil for the whole squad.
Name another club who have 'officially' spent ÂŁ1bn over a handful of years, but have in all likelihood spent much more than that, including paying the likes of ex managers loads of money via fictitious 'consultancies '.
what these muppets dont understand is that its not about what Pep has done which has to be admired but its pre Pep cooking the books to be able to build a club from nowhere to title winners in the space of a few years. If they hadnt done it then Pep wouldnt have turned up anyway because his modus operandi is to take over clubs with massive financial backing that are already successful and make them better
Ddc.. of course its about the money. As far as competition is concerned, people will accept inherent unfairness but the obvious alleged corruption is insulting. And they want respect..
So without oil money your telling me they'd of won the treble with the likes of goater?? đ€ CHEATS end of
Something tells me if you pop Pep over to Oxford United with their budgets (respectfully) he wouldn't be litfing any PL/CL trophies within a decade. Just so happens that MCity have a top flight manager however part of their success could* be due to rule breaking AS WELL, it's not that complicated or hard to understand.
What a stupid logic that is, so you think Ferguson or Wenger or Klopp get Oxford winning the PL or the UCL?
They would have more chance
@@theblues8840 no mate, that wasn't the point being made at all.
@@michaelcalvert6323 i wouldn't argue against that, there's a multitude of factors that go into it.
@wholesomedolphin387 let's be honest then. Yes Pep is a good manager and definitely improves players, but he's never proven himself at a lower team. Klopp wins with Dortmund, Fergie wins with Aberdeen, Wenger won the league and Cup with Monaco. If Pep came from a Sevilla or an Osasuna successfully then people wouldn't argue he's the greatest. Until that happens which is never will now because he's so far into his career, so will can never get a definitive answer. So I'd still have Fergie at the top, no doubt Peps matching him now or maybe slightly outshining him but he still doesnt have that mid club resume the others have.
Hes right its not about the 'money' its about the corruption and cheating that they are allowed to get away with
Lots of clubs have bought players and sold for profit. Pep is a great manager, but hes never been at an average club without the ability to cherry pick the best players. But im certain he would improve any club in the world. And the way he dealt with foden and has made him the brilliant player he is now was genius. Yes there is an element of having money, but its also about how good pep is.
Right off the bat, only Chelsea, Utd, Arsenal, and Liverpool are playing in the same league as City-Newcastle canât because of FFP. That already gives City a huge advantage. City paid ÂŁ100 M for Grealish, and heâs been a peripheral figure for most of his three seasons. Nunes and Phillips were both bought for 50M+, and both might never play any meaningful minutes for City. Other clubs simply canât afford to make such mistakes.
Did the city fan say take the punishment on the chin and move on, that tells me he thinks nothing serious will happen, i really think he is wrong
They were a bang average mid table team before a billionaire threw a bucket of oil over them
The disrespect Grealish gets is insane
If man city never did a win anything nobody would have a problem with them spending big but because there are winning things everyone has a problem
Its hard to say this isn't one of the greatest teams of all time. Its not purely down to money in the sense of buying players, but the money to set up the structure that we currently see. Having an academy that produces Foden, Lewis, Palmer and Sancho doesn't happen without money. Having a scouting network and multi club model doesn't happen without money. Having Pep, and the backroom team doesn't happen without money. But it still has to be executed
Didn't they get caught paying Mancini through shell companies? I dread to think what they're ACTUALLY paying Pep and some of their players.
They would have been able to afford all of this though, without the initial cheating.
Why do think people fear city but don't respect them.? It's money of course.!
Could pep come to city if they were not about money?
Man City's success is down to money spent to build the squad for over the past 12 years. Also, money spent wisely.
Man City was spending 50M only defender when 50 million was like 100 million of today
The only thing I want from you Simon is to tell the truth, the whole truth. The fact is Manchester city football club is the best run club in the world in EVERY area, including accountancy. The full story is;
OBVIOUSLY!!! What happened to Manchester City is ALL about money. This isn't the first time City have spent a fortune trying to catch up to Manchester United. Chairman Peter Swales in the 70s and 80s made league record player purchases. Kevin Keegan spent a fortune. And Manchester City were on the verge of doing a Leeds United. City were so broke, it is alleged that when the man turned up with the paint to paint for the white lines on the pitch, he wouldn't give over the paint until the City groundsman gave the money for the paint. (about the time of Stuart Pearce. I think that season City had scored 10 goals at home all season.) And if it hadn't been for the Thai owner, spending a fortune, City would have been bankrupt. Then the sheik came in and spent a reasonable amount LOL. No City fan is denying that isn't due to benefactors from Swales through to Sheikh Mansour. But the sheer hypocrisy from Mark Goldberg, his bitterness, sourness, and downright lying hypocrisy, is hilarious.
I hold my hands up, I don't know much about football. I'm not a real footpath fan, I'M JUST a Manchester City fan. I am completely biased to City, and a political view of football. Pep Guardiola, when paraphrasing Julius Caesar, when talking about the 115 charges absolutely nailed the political analysis when he said "there are no friends, there are no enemies, there are only INTERESTS." If you don't think The Premier League and UEFA and their members actions isn't about money INTERESTS, you are naĂŻve in the extreme. And that's what politics is, economic INTERESTS.
I knew straightaway that the sheik hadn't bought Manchester City for sports washing or any of the other lazy crass sports page analysis, this was simply oil money diversifying wealth production from oil, to other areas. I too was astounded at the level of money that was being spent. How could you ever hope to recoup such amounts of money? Is Manchester City just a plaything? But it turns out this was a simple "loss leader" business strategy.
The sheik, like in his 13 other clubs around the world, has gone into each club and bought the best advice in EVERY area. There is not a single area in Manchester City Football Club you can look at where the evidence doesn't point to the fact Manchester City Football Club is the best run football club in the world. Why? Because now he has created a massive revenue stream.
Now, 115 charges. Now if this Sheikh has bought the best advice in EVERY area, and through doing so has created a massive revenue stream, why would you buy such terrible accountancy advice that couldn't steer him round committing international fraud in collusion with other companies such as Etihad? Etihad by the way, which is going public, which means its books have to be public to people who wish to purchase it. If Etihad is guilty of fraud, would it publish this fraud to the people who wish to purchase it? And if Etihad has accounting detail proving it didn't commit fraud with Manchester City Football Group, don't you think Manchester City Football Group also have that proof?
Foden from academy and Alvalez less money spent on him during signing.
Pep only goes to teams with money, would love to see how he does at Dorkens
Are you always this stupid or do you take lessons? Why would the best coach in the world go and manage Dorkens?
Exactly he would probably go to PSG after this job
Didn't know Barcelona of 2009 was overflowing with money.
Without untold amounts of money and Messi, Guardiola would quite pissibly just be another De Zerbi.
You lost your argument because you don't even rate De Zerbi.
@@rrjgpl Currently where are Brighton in the league? Tenth. They played some nice football last season but won the sum total of zero. This season they've gone backwards both in terms of league position and style of play. They are bellow West Ham who are parting ways with their manager despite him winning a trophy bigger than anything De Zerbi and Brighton have ever won.
It's my opinion. We'll never know how Guardiola would fare without untold amounts of money, without a team/squad full of quality players, and at a team that isn't the biggest/richest club in its league because he'll never join a club that can't give him those things.
@@jaysmith2858 well he has coached Barca B and promoted them in Psanish lower division football. He also brought those same players into the main team and won UCL with them. So, it's not stretch to imagine that with the right recruitment, he can get a poor team to heights.
And you rank De Zerbi poorly because of one bad season? This is why EPL fans can have nothing good. They don't recognize the quality they have until they are gone.
@@rrjgpl Barca B contains better/more expensive footballers than most other clubs in world football. Chris Wilder got Sheffield United promoted to the PL. Is he a world class manager? I think not.
I need to see a manager have more than one good (but not great) season before I start lauding them to the rafters, especially when they lose a couple of their players and everything goes to pot. If a manager is that good they can get others to pick up the slack so that at worst they don't fall off a cliff and they still maintain their footballing philosophy.
Any sensible football fan can recognise the truth, and the truth is that De Zerbi still has a lot to prove.
Guardiola won the CL with a stacked, Messi led Barca side, failed to win the CL with Bayern Munich, and it took him 7 years to win the CL despite being in charge of the richest, most stacked and highly paid club/team in world football. That suggests that he wouldn't be anywhere near as successful if he wasn't handed every possible advantage he could have over his rivals.
Let Guardiola manage porto and make them win the champions league. Or may be try managing sheiffled united and make them win the league. Without money he definitely can't. Its all down to money.
City cheated by spending more than the club generates. But as a Utd fan, I am still mad and salty about the fact that Haaland, Rodri,Dias, De Bruyne, Silva are cheaper than the likes of Pogba,Maguire,Antony, Sancho and Lukaku. It's hard to troll plastic city fans about money when Utd are the ones overspending on flops
If its not about money then let Pep join Aston Villa,Everton or Brighton and win the Premier league. Pep is a freaking check book manager.
Mancini has won , pelligirini won -
very smart fan, look at the money Ten Hag has spent, don't see United doing anything amazing
Shut up! @shutup2751
Money is not a guarantee (ETH and United are good examples) - But you're silly if you think it's not about money. There's a general correlation between spending and success. Man CIty laboured for decades without winning anything. They obtained Saudi funding and used that money to bring in the best manager and the best players. Like Jordan said - they've spent the MONEY well. You cant spend (well) what you dont have. Arsenal are where they are now because they've spent (relatively) well.
they literally cooked the books for a decade which made it look like they made more money than they actually did... and therefore be able to spend more money... and buy the best players. and the only defense any of the 15 city fans have is to say "cry more."
it was already proven by UEFA but there was statue of limitations in place so it couldn't be convicted. there's no possible way to defend it. the only people who will be crying is the fans of a billion dollar team playing Sunday league.
Well I tell you what apart from the new signing this season arsenals players are more than how much they got them for.
Bought Nunez benched him no one cares. Bought grealish bench him no problem movie to the next winger Doku with ease
Utd fans were always called glory supporters, city fans canât take it
Even before pepcame to city, they where dominating the league. Of course its money
It is true. Otherwise, Man Utd would be winning it all. It's disingenuous to discredit Pep. He's arguably the greatest manager of all time.
And even the manager has to defend the club
It's down to money and money alone what are you talking about đđđđđ
ManCheaty 115+ Relegation to the conference league beckons.
W/o wo Steady on young man
You bad mind mug
Real Madrid spend money every season, you never see or hear anyone complain đđđ. I love me a club owner that spend money
bro is just jealousy
They're going to be the first team to leave and go off to a Super League. AND then the Spanish will complain.
Why is it every other club gets points taken away city brings them to court
chelski and shiitty are literally an artificial club. I'm 36 yrs old an I have only met 1 chelski fan all my lifeđ
36yrs going on 10yrs going off your post.
Not about money how deluded. Without money you wouldn't be able to buy all the players, the manager and wouldn't have any of success. As the past 100 yrs before money coming in proves that! Having more money then any team to boost an already title challenging team when pep comes in, so other teams can't compete with the finances but it's not down to money đ
Money argument is so dumb as MU have proven it. Money gives you opportunities but NEVER guarantees you success. Football, money and being a chef are quite similar.
Just look at Chelsea past few years, MU for the last 10 and even Arsenal since Arteta came in. If Arteta wins the PL, he will have spent ÂŁ700m+ to do it. When Pep came to City, he had one of the oldest teams in the league and needed to clear a lot out especially given the style of football he wanted to play. He spent big the summer going into the 2017/18 season (close to ÂŁ300m gross I believe) but won the PL with 100pts. The following summer he spent around another ÂŁ130m gross and won it again by 1 point. So in 3 seasons with a gross spend of ÂŁ430m he won back to back titles.
The difference is not the money as Arteta has spent more and had far more time and you can make similar arguments for MU and Chelsea and perhaps Klopp to a degree (it took him more time and more money to win a PL than Pep). Itâs all about the manager. Depending on the time frame, Klopp proves it and Pep def does. Thereâs a reason top class managers are paid so much as itâs not simply about having the best players money can buy, otherwise, clubs would spend the big money on the players and anyone could be manager, which is clearly not the case
? They were in the third division 20 years ago!!! Pep doesn't do it as a charity. And Man City now have one of the most expensive teams in history...what do you not understand, or do you just think of the top 4 teams..they need to disappear to the Super League and play their matches in Singapore and LA. It's clearly all about the $$$$$$. Do you think ANY of their owners care about the football league?
@@adriandenton6637 Firstly, how many seasons were City in the 3rd division? How many seasons were they in the second division?
As for money, prove me wrong. Show me where money guarantees success regardless of the manager
Without the takeover and money City would still be an average premier league side.
Exactly. These kids born in 2000s have only seen manchester city be top class little do they know the foundations of their club has been built off of money. Liverpool, man utd and arsenals foundation was not built of off money. Key word âfoundationâ.
Every team started somewhere. Chelsea wasnât this good yrs ago, United too, lpool.
Whatâs Martinelli, Odegaard, Saliba, Saka worth ? lol
If anything City have embarrassed everyone else with how well theyâve spent the money. I bet the people crying hadnât even seen Rodri , Alvarez , Dias ,Akanji ect play before pep brought them in. Not a city fan but itâs a masterclass how they buy players. You also give any other manager this team and they arenât winning the league every year , trust me.
Not a single player Pep has bought at City was ever considered the best in their positions beforehand.
Amazing how he never won the treble at bayern forget about barcelona because the team was already made for him. Didn't have a bottomless wallet at bayern and couldn't win champions league, bottomline. End of... cheaters, overstating profits. Owner putting personal money above the budget. All the charges are correct, no doubt but they will get away with it.
Where were they before the money?
Lets not pretend pep guardiola doesnt deserve credit. He does. But to say money and therefore resources arenât a factor is just silly
Man city Fans wants Man united attention đ, which is hard with charges laying around.
It Is a balanced debate???
Its not even balanced criticism
Itâs just bitter arguments and insults half the time
I bet that fan laughs when he farts in the bath too
And how did they pay peps wages?
Yeah right!.
Funny that forest and Everton get deducted points and city get away with constant cheating
its called money well spent.
Leicester broke FFP to get into the prem the couple years before they won it
They will win the league 4 times in a row yet no one cares! đ
If not about money tell me wat they have won before money came
What did Man City do before money without that money pep wouldnât be the city manager ever come on tell the truth
That is a whole new way of being in denial .
Respect is earned, not bought.
Good job City are only the sixth in the net spend table.
@@robertmclellan3658 We still prentending to trust Man City's financial records?
Next you will tell me Haaland actually cost the ÂŁ51mil that was claimed.
@@vPzWalkerx City have the most scrutinised accounts in the world and NOBODY has ever found any discrepancies .
Who do you respect in the P. L
@@robertmclellan3658 Not sure about that