You are FAR more knowledgeable about mics than am I. I just don't understand why - considering your review - my Stellar X2 sounds better on my spoken voice than any of my other mics, including the AT2035, Rode NT1 and AKG Perception 100. The Rode NT1 is very close, but the Stellar X2 wins for me. Other than gain adjustments to get as equal a comparison as possible, there is no pre- or post-processing involved. Yes, different mics are better suited to different voices, but my range and tone are not so dissimilar from yours. Your setup sounds so much more harsh in the high end than mine - it just doesn't sound like mine at all. Anyway, just saying, people need to do their due diligence and not just place all their trust in one or two CZcams reviews. I bought into the Stellar X2 hype and, while that goes against my own advice here (since only a couple of reviews existed at the time I purchased), I cannot say I am disappointed. On the contrary - I love it!
I just got mine, fired it up & boy was I blown away. Now I've never owned a U87 or a TLM103, nor have either been used in any one of my many studio sessions (I'm a professional voice actor in Los Angeles) but after listening back I was very happy with what I heard. I'm not saying that this is going to be a winner for every voice & every application, but for my voice (mildly on the deep end w a li'l grit) & for commercial voice over work- I'm thoroughly impressed. I'd been using an SM7b for a few years now w good results but I'm going to put that girl on the shelf & put this much cleaner, much crisper, much more "honest" X2 to work.
Hm. Call me crazy but I preferred it to every mic you tested as far as your voice. Yes, it's slightly sibilant, but not in a *cheap* way - for my ears it comes off as just a little bit extra presence and the kind that should be easy to taper in post for personal preference. I agree it doesn't sound like the Neumanns though. FTR I'm listening with a high-end DAC and Sennheiser 6XX headphones.
For 200 dollars it's a great sounding microphone IMO. Very nice and balanced and very low noise. I think people should stop comparing this to a Neumann because thats too high of a standard. Although I do think maybe you should do a noise floor test between the X2. To me, my X2 is very quiet compared to other mics I've used including many MXL mics.
I explain exactly why I compared it to the Neumann’s. It’s been done so frequently in other reviews and comments, and even in Tech Zones description for this video, that I figured, I should compare them. As I mentioned in this video, I think it is fine for $200 and an improvement over the at2020 in its smoothness. I think a lot of people in the comments are misinterpreting me saying it’s not a Neumann as me saying it’s shit. No. It’s fine for $200.
@@Podcastage I understand, yes Neumann is a too high standard for it and that makes sense. Just like the more critical reviews they have on amazon stated, its a great mic for 200 but its not Neumann especially not Neumann's build. I do look forward to seeing what the company would do. Are they going to release a more expensive version that is more like the U87 and the Vintage seems interesting... It seems like that model would fit you perfectly especially for your voice.
Man, I've been wanting to learn more about these since Booth Junkie did his review. Thanks for doing the untreated room test, which not enough people do. I think this mic did reasonably well in that. The comparisons were the most useful part of the test, although I wish you'd included a King Bee as that's what I'm on right now lol. I do think the Stellar sounds as good than the NT1 (although it has its own flavor), which I think is probably its closest competitor in price point and market segment as well as being an industry standard. I did like the Neumanns more... but not that kind of money more! Your reviews have always been great but they just keep getting better and more complete over time. Thanks for doing this!
You’re on a killer mic right now. (No pun intended). It’s a real sleeper and I was blown away by that mic. I’d pick the king bee over this mic every time.
@@Podcastage Hi Bandrew. I am having minor buyers remorse of my Rode PodMic based on yours (and others, as well) suggestion of incredible value. I do not totally dislike the microphone or anything, but I can't help but wonder if the amount of gain I have to give the microphone negates the dynamic benefits and makes it just as sensitive in my environment as my old condenser microphone was. Do you think I should try auditioning a King Bee in my untreated space? I feel like being able to turn the gain down and get on the microphone might make it less sensitive than my PodMic at 3 o'clock gain
@@codetanner5128 My question would be, are you hearing excessive hiss in your recording? If not, I don't think you have anything to be concerned with. The podmic will be better at rejecting the room tone from an untreated space compared to the King Bee, just solely based on the fact that the King Bee extends from 20Hz - 20kHz and picks up all of that relatively well. The fact that you're at 3:00 for a dynamic is not in and of it self concerning for a dynamic mic since that's what almost all of them will require.
My three favorite mics in the review were the U87, the TLM103 and surprise surprise.... the Stellar X2. The X2 is clear and has a nice flavor. Thank you so much for the review.
Ive owned 2 of them for like a year and they’re a decent bargain. The rode nt1 is pretty similar, and I’m about the try Acustica LAVA to help it sound even nicer.
Although the market is pretty rich with microphones of all types in this price range, I can totally see why someone would prefer TZ Stellar X2 over its closest competitors. It might not be warm or bassy, but for some music instruments and voices it really does a good job at emphasizing the detail in the high frequencies. It isn't the same as TLM103, U87 or NT1, but a very decent debut mic. Looking forward to their vintage mic.
I've had 2 NT1s in the space of a week and both have stopped working! This has got to be better for the reason that Rode made terrible quality products
You have a real gift to make all the mics sound just the same! I've tested most of the ones you've shown and they really sound different but for a reason your super human microphone power makes them sound like if your using only one mic. Cheers
@@RogwinMusic I hade a 103 some time ago and in my opinion you get what you pay for, good for maybe acoustic guitar, but not close to my U87Ai when I comes to vocals.
@@PinballLunatic You kidding? Vocals are what the TLM 103 does best. The U87Ai has a boxy, nasally sound in comparison to the 103. It's only as expensive as it is because there's two capsules in it instead of just one. It's not a higher quality mic at all; just a different mic. After $1K, it stops being about quality and starts being about preference.
Honestly I got the stellar x2 and got a bit dissapointed at first. Until I started using it in a mix, and especially after boosting the highs for singing it smashed my other mics.
Stellar X2 : 4:12 At2020 : 4:40 RODE NT1 - 5:08 Rosswell 5:33 Neumann TLM 102 : 6:06 TLM 103 : 6:34 -III- U87 AI : 7:09 I was looking fr rode nt1 vs the world so kudos to Bandrew as always . I d love to see how does rode nt1 compares to let s say at2035, lewitt 440pure, king bee and other great value mics in untreated spaces, as we often look fr mics (esp in that price range) to occasionally use them in less than perfect spaces aswell / ppl are also often buying better mic to be more future proof but they d like to start recording in between treatment process . Some controlled background noise, compirasion of echo etc would be amazing for all home studio starters. If anyone would ever make it happen then it s podcastage fr sure :D
That ^ + it would be amazing if he d get some yt singer(or any other that would do it for free) for bigger compirasions aswell. This channel is already the best on yt in terms of mic tests, however additional singing voice (with a different tone than Bandrew s) could make this channel huge even faster, aswell as shutting up all the online fights over the mics as he covers almost everything in his tests
Thanks for comparing all those microphones. It really showed how well the stellar x2 holds up against them. I might be considering purchasing it over the NT1 due to its tone being very similar.
And another thing he sounds best on the Stellar x2... The stellar x2 sounds Fantastic! Very similar to the 103 & U87 if not the better give or take what headphones or monitors you are using! But fast fix to that feeding it through a EQ or Crossover that will fixes your listening process problem! Real talk.
Good video as always Podcastage. I think the X2 is impressive. Although It might be the same as a thousand dollar microphone it has a very similar tone to that of the NT1. I have heard much harsher mics at a higher price point. So for $200 although you won't be getting a u87 sound but you will get a balanced sounding mic for a great price.
Lol sorry but there's nothing impressive about that mic. I see that even TechZone themselves wrote in the comments here that the mic is overhyped, and that's exactly what it is.
I don't care about comparisons to legendary mics or whether people agree/disagree/rag on it. I think comparisons sound different depending on a number of factors per video...all I know is that this mic consistently sounds great in all reviews I watch. I'm going purely on what it sounds like for itself, and I disagree that it sounds like the 2020...which I am not a big fan of. I've always thought that for the money, if you are going for a 20 series...go for 2035 over 2020, I personally own and love the 4040. To me, this mic is a lot smoother and complete in the frequency ranges that the 2020 is not. 2020 is a little more sibilant (not in a bad way) and lacks some balls in the mid range somewhere, whereas the X2 is just incredibly soft, smooth, and clear. I love it for how it sounds and the fact that it is not made with cheap parts like other mass-produced cheap mics.
The audio does sound like the AT2020, but much sharper than the audio other reviewers have for the X2. One theory I have is that an excessive high-ramp was somehow incorporated into your instance. A ramp of 0dB at 6KHz to -4dB at 12KHz might ease the sibilance and still have the silky sound.. It sounds better in the better-result-reviews. Maybe you are all correct and your serial number is hot at the high end? This happens in electronics sometimes.
I appreciate this review. I was able to hear different mics that Interest me. The TLM 102 is my first choice-that will be the one I work to acquire within 2-yrs. But for now, it’s the NT1 or the Stellar X2. The NT1 sounded brighter; the X2 had more presence & a more even delivery (IMHO). So I will order the X2 regular or vintage. I’ll decide & continue sound treating my walk-in closet & recording room. The real difference will be the work put forth in the shed. Peace.
What would you get for between $200 and 150 for home studio singing recording? Is there anything in this range worth the extra $ over say a AT 2020 or AKG P220? I want something warm, and sing lots of falsetto and also low range. Thanks!
What? No Neumann u47 FET comparison??? Just kidding, it didn't come close to the Neumann mics but I was impressed with how good it sounds. Another 10 years and these "budget microphones" might actually change the game.
Where to find ALL the gear for this mic? All it's sold is the mic, cover and the holder. What arm do you suggest and where do I get the wires for the mic to connect it with my computer? Please help!
Good to see differing opinions. I’m trying to decide on a new mic in this range. I really can’t hear anything as nice as the X2. Though, videos are all i have to go by. So again, it’s nice to hear varying opinions
Maybe it's just my k7xx headphones but the Stellar x2 sounded just as good as the tlm103 and u87 to me. maybe I'm biased because I bought a stellarx2 a few weeks ago but yeah it sounds really good when compared to the two of them and I am very happy with my purchase
@@goaway2174 I definitely will, but I am also the type of person who is never fully satisfied so I expect I'll probably get an NT1 sometime soon to see how it sounds on my voice and I'll check out the new tech zone audio products mic when it comes out which is supposed to have a warmer sound
@@Dracomies I can't really hear what makes the Neumann mics sound better. I have very untrained ears though so that's probably why. Like i said in my other comment I'm also planning on getting a rode nt1. My voice is not high pitched or very bassy, I'm like in the middle so I honestly cant hear if the mic is flattering on my voice or not
@@JonathanDano What was also interesting was that another actor (he owns the NT1) bought the X2. He had an AB test between the NT1 and X2. The sound was nearly identical. He added the audio clips in a Discord and people couldn't tell the two apart.
Thank you for doing a comparison on the OGs and for adding music to the testing gauntlet. While for example the Booth Junkie was over the moon about it - and it fits his voice quite well - your voice indeed sounds better on the RØDE NT1, so I know why that’s one of your favorites. I prefer the NT1 overall.
I suppose it depends on the users voice. To the reviewers with deeper voices like Booth Junkie it sounded really good, but here it doesn't sound so great. As always, excellent review.
As I say in the video I think it’s a fine microphone. I think for $150 to $200 it’s right on par. But is it as awesome as a u87 or TLM103 like so many reviews on youtube and amazon say? No not at all. I think that is incredibly misleading and to my ears, wrong.
Sorry but I think Boot Junkie either did not do an honest review, either he has trouble hearing those high frequencies (later edit: or he got a totally different capsule in his microphone). I really apreciate you did a honest review, @Podcastage, in spite of all the tons of reviewers which sounded like getting a free microphone from those bedroom mic modders guys was enough for them to give away mad props on a mediocre mic that doesn't sound nowhere near neumann mics.
Mike (Booth Junkie) does a video on EQ on his channel and he basically showed that his voice doesn't register on the high frequencies much at all, he could eliminate most of it in EQ (high shelf) and it didn't make a difference. Maybe why the X2 was such a good fit for him. Thanks again, great reviews as always!
@@goaway2174 yes, he might have to check if the capsule in his is not from the Sennheiser /Neumann spare parts store as 90% of the sound of a mic is in the capsule. Anyway, props to Booth Junkie as he generated a HUGE hype, but at least the shelf product does not deserve the attention, he might indeed gotten something really different.
Great comparison! I actually found it very similar to the NT1 tbh. I did not really found it bright or sharp sounding like you described it. It is not a Neumann for sure though but very similar to the NT1
I bought the AKG C214 recently and ordered the Stellar X2 after finding out about it. I just recorded a voice demo with both and I do not see enough of a difference to justify paying twice as much for the C214. Anyone else have opinions on this?
Great video, thanks for the comparisons . I had less than $100 and a boom mic stand so I got the Behringer B-5, I like the sound of this one better than all the mics I tested (I started with the Neewer NW7000). Well except for the Rode NTG2, but it was too expensive for me at the time. So the B-5 it is for me untill I get the, I think it's the Deity S-Mic 2 (the shotgun mic you like)..
Your reviews are great and really detailed, but for me it's pretty difficult to base any kind of decision on someone speaking into a mic, or in this case even playing guitar. The real test for me is always drums. For example the Neewer NW-700 is far too hot to use on drums and distorts easily. Since the output on this one is really high it's probably the same. I really don't see much of a advantage over the NW-700.
There is a review that came out from Sound on Sound that tested on many applications. cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0297/1523/4954/files/techzone-stellar-x2.pdf?v=1592599538
Here is their sound cloud where you can find many different samples. This is something I submitted to them that you can check out. That was with a matched pair of Stellar X2 and let me tell you, it handles transients very well. You can hear for yourself the clarity when the drums are recorded. soundcloud.com/user-705791432/stereo-pair-drum-overheads-bamm-bamm-music-ltd?in=user-705791432/sets/voice-over-stellar-x2-samples
Thanks for the review podcastage. I was recently looking into purchasing a new microphone and I feel the X2 will make a great addition due to its tone being very similar to that of the TLM102.
I bought one and for my voice it's great but probably wouldn't work for everyone. Also have a avatone c12, and a shure ksm32 .Next song I write I will use the stellar on vocals and see how it works. The avatone is better for acoustic guitar.
I really appreciate your earnestness! I've been checking out your reviews and your genuineness and honesty and solid sense come through. Kudos and keep doing your reviews. I'd be interested in hearing your mixes to see whether those qualities are represented in your technical and musical choices. Would you consider posting some of your work or discuss your approach with some examples?
Another spot-on review. This mic wouldn't work for me because my voice is sibilant, though not high. It's awesome though, to have a product line that includes a variety of mic sounds for each of the different needs.
Forget about it. These cables are a travesty. Makes no sense for a condenser (no phantom power), makes little sense for a dynamic (onboard audio mic inputs are generally quite noisy), not to mention that you'd want to record a stereo signal and subtract one channel from the other in order to benefit from the balanced cabling. If you need just one in the foreseeable future, get a USB mic. Inexpensive ones can sound a bit ragged (thin and scratchy), but I've actually heard some decent ones around the $50 mark (e.g. Samson Meteor, Maono AU-PM401). Otherwise, assuming you actually still have a dedicated mic/line-in on the computer (most have gone headset jack, which requires a corresponding adapter so you can get a mono input at least), a little compact mixer would give a higher degree of flexibility. I think the Behringer Xenyx 502 is about the cheapest unit with full +48V phantom power, though it is supposed to be a bit noisier than the next model up, the 802, so I'd tend more towards that. I've gone the mixer route since I have an older but still very good quality consumer soundcard. Plan C is the usual ubiquitous USB audio interface, from the bargain basement Behringer UMC202HD to whatever better-quality model you prefer.
Yeah. It’s not a bad microphone. It’s just a bit sharper than I’d prefer, and that is far more apparent on other people’s voices. If you have been gifted with a deeper voice like Booth Junkie, it seems to be a much better fit.
Great review! I bought it based on why he didn't like it lol. It's perfect! Great mic if you want lots of high end detail but without scooped midrange IMO.
I think the NT1 sounds worse than the X2, because the NT1 has too much emphasis on the 'boomy' bass frequencies around 150-300Hz, The K47 sounds too muffled in some frequencies. The X2 has a more natural frequency response in my ears (I'm listening on a Beyer DT770 Pro studio headphone) close to that of the TLM102/103 that both have amazingly natural frequency response across the whole spectrum. The U87ai in my ears sounds better but the difference is minimal. There's a serious case of diminishing returns after the 200 dollar price point. Yes there's a difference, but 99,x% of people will in no way hear the difference anymore (most people don't even hear whether drums are programmed on a PC or not anymore these days...). Whatever you do with post production will likely have a 10 fold higher impact after the NT1 price point, in my opinion. And, that's a great thing. In 2020, excellent microphones are just really affordable!
Great video! I'm curious if you've used the Sontronics STC-2 and if you have an opinion as to how it compares to the Tech Zone Stellar X2 and the King Bee?
TechZone originally said they were modeling this after the U87 only. Haven’t owned one or heard one but my listening test here was to close my eyes, plug in my Sony MDR7506 monitor headphones and wait till you started speaking into the U87. And to my ears, as produced through these studio headphones, I honestly did not hear a noticeable difference. So to my ears, TechZone achieved a similar sound as designed. That said, I also didn’t hear a significant noticeable difference between the X2 and the AT2020 so a valid point that for $100 less, the AT2020 may be the better investment. For years, I’ve had raving feedback on how well my voice sounds on the USB version of the AT2020 which just makes the point clear that ultimately... all reviews are purely subjective and personal and your voice or purpose for any given mic should be tested individually before coming to a final conclusion ;)
When it comes down to it, content is king. You can absolutely get by with a $100 mic in most applications. Reviews where we nitpick to this level are for nutters. Most people will never hear a difference and it won’t matter unless you’re in a super high end studio with crazy high standards.
Very good Review, I really enjoyed it! It would be cool if you add some noise floor test to the comparisons! I recently bought an NT1, cant wait to test it!
The X2 doesn't quite pick up the bass as the Neumanns, but is definitely a very good buy for $200. IMO the average ear can't hear much difference and when mixed with instruments and a little EQ magic, is spending more really worth it?
I dunno, on my headphones is really sounded super close to the TLM103, but I completely agree with the upper frequencies. I would say the biggest winner would be the Rode NT1 or NT1a if you wanna be closer to the Stellar price point.
Pretty good value. Shock mount and fancy case and a piece of foam-- attractive if you're on a budget. But you know what? Audio Technica really owns that $100 dollar market. Pretty wide cardiod pattern on this mic. Lots of plosives. Uh-- That 103 is WORSE than the Stellar? Who is saying that???
I saw on your site that you have reviews of the Rode M5 and Se Electronics Se7 coming out.... I'm trying to order a matched pair of one of these either today or tomorrow. Have you done any comparison of these two?
The CZcams compression is doing what an old valve mic preamp would do, in a way, making them all sound very similar. I have a Rode NT-1 and it is waaaaay smoother, cleaner and quieter than, say, MXL mics. If you have the option to spend money for quality DO!!!
I'm not sure what you mean. You think the NW7000 beat this mic out or vice versa? Regardless, I'm glad that you were able to identify which mic was right for you. happy recording.
Why does the stellar x2 sounds in your review sharper than in comparable reviews? czcams.com/video/GcUQE_NyHi4/video.html ...In this review the X2 sounds on par with the Neumann with smooth High End.
First off thank you for a close to honest review and for all of you who purchased this 'mini mic' who were confused by thinking it is made by Stellar, 'THE' microphone company that has been in business for years ? As STELLAR corrected me '' It is not''. TZ sells this pocket sized wonder and I say wonder because l wonder why any one would spend 200.00 on an off brand, so so performing mic ? Podcastage does not want to come right out and tell it's viewers, who already purchased one, that it's an over priced, underperforming product. To balance off all the Phony Hype I forced myself to write this to enlighten all newbie's. There are name brands out there like sE MXL AKG to name just a few that offer so much more for the same price point. The day will come when you get serious about what your doing and will want to move up where the Pro's reign and if you hope to gain their respect ? I'm sure I will get a lot of negative crap from the site's who TZ has sent their FREE mic's to and promised more FREE gear, to evaluate in the future but that's to be understood.
I listened to half of this on my iPad speakers and the second half on my Bose Bluetooth headphones. In other words, the two ways I always listen to CZcams. I barely heard any difference between any of the microphones. In other words, the net sound to my ears was a function of how the video file was compressed, the quality of the sound reproduction of the iPad, the quality of the speakers or the quality of the Bluetooth connection and the headphone speakers. I was really surprised at the summary given how little difference I perceived. My guess is that the presenter had very high quality playback equipment and was listening to a lossless version of the recording. If I was a podcaster and wanted to choose a nice-sounding microphone that’s would sound good to CZcams listeners, I wouldn’t hesitate spending $200 for this excellent microphone or even a lesser amount for the Audio Technica.
I really don't know what most of the people who hear a difference are talking about cause I don't hear a difference as well and the parts that sound different just may be how he is speaking.
1. I could care less (not insulting, just a premise for my comments... in other words, I have no agenda) 2. I've heard no reviews/buzz/hype whatsoever, so whatever that mic is did sound pretty good, with no expectation on my end. 3. It sounded like a decent, cheap China mic. I have some GXLs that I bought about 20 years ago for $80ish. Something like that. Good first mic. 4. It did sound quite similar to the AT2020 (and I do like the AT brand), but I think you said the 2020 is cheaper? 5. It sounded better than most of the other cheap mics you showed (less weird high end crap). 6. The mic is not the most important thing, for people that can't afford $100K in gear. The music and the musical talent are most important. Then, the room you're in. If you don't have these, then don't blow money on gear... just get cheap used stuff, pay with cash (no credit cards), until you do find some talent. Don't obsess about gear until people are paying you big bucks to record an album. Then, let them pay for the gear.
Thanks awesome review as usual! Those Neumann really sounded super smooth, haha that’s the premium $ difference. I’m interested with this mic but after hearing side by side with AT2020 (I have 2035) I might have to pass as I didn’t noticed huge differences. Great review 👏 I agree based on the comparison made, it’s not comparable to Neumann models. Yeah thanks for demystifying that hype.. please review the GTZ GototoolZ mic also, quite popular, best to check if that is for real Neumann sounding or not.
I'll wait for your release of the Raw audio of this video. the CZcams compression messes with the audio too much. cause it does sound like it can be up there with a little tweaking on the youtube video.
hey Bandrew, just asking out of curiosity..why are you doing giveaway..? the other day i read on your website why you don't do giveaways and the reasons you pointed out were actually quite valid..so what made you change your mind..?
Because I’m in a position where I can start give back and work with companies to send stuff to people. And I’m not doing them on youtube really meaning I’m not making a big “giveaway” or putting that in tags or the first three lines of the description so a lot of the people won’t find it that way. And I announce it at the outro where most people who aren’t subscribers have already clicked off. Also, I’m not asking for people to like or subscribe or comment on my videos so it’s not affecting my video performance at all.
Dear Bandrew, Just an idea, like automated microphone frequency testing: a tone / frequency generator in front of a microphone and then compare what reaches the audio interface would give a more technical analysis of a microphone, what do you think? Maybe you can address this on the @bandrewsays podcast?
This type of measurement is extremely difficult to do well. There are companies that pay hundreds of thousands, or millions to build anechoic chambers to do these tests. There are some options to do these measurements in a large room you just lose the ability to accurately measure the low frequencies. But I don’t have a big enough room for that method either.
You are FAR more knowledgeable about mics than am I. I just don't understand why - considering your review - my Stellar X2 sounds better on my spoken voice than any of my other mics, including the AT2035, Rode NT1 and AKG Perception 100. The Rode NT1 is very close, but the Stellar X2 wins for me. Other than gain adjustments to get as equal a comparison as possible, there is no pre- or post-processing involved. Yes, different mics are better suited to different voices, but my range and tone are not so dissimilar from yours. Your setup sounds so much more harsh in the high end than mine - it just doesn't sound like mine at all. Anyway, just saying, people need to do their due diligence and not just place all their trust in one or two CZcams reviews. I bought into the Stellar X2 hype and, while that goes against my own advice here (since only a couple of reviews existed at the time I purchased), I cannot say I am disappointed. On the contrary - I love it!
I just got mine, fired it up & boy was I blown away. Now I've never owned a U87 or a TLM103, nor have either been used in any one of my many studio sessions (I'm a professional voice actor in Los Angeles) but after listening back I was very happy with what I heard. I'm not saying that this is going to be a winner for every voice & every application, but for my voice (mildly on the deep end w a li'l grit) & for commercial voice over work- I'm thoroughly impressed. I'd been using an SM7b for a few years now w good results but I'm going to put that girl on the shelf & put this much cleaner, much crisper, much more "honest" X2 to work.
Hm. Call me crazy but I preferred it to every mic you tested as far as your voice. Yes, it's slightly sibilant, but not in a *cheap* way - for my ears it comes off as just a little bit extra presence and the kind that should be easy to taper in post for personal preference. I agree it doesn't sound like the Neumanns though. FTR I'm listening with a high-end DAC and Sennheiser 6XX headphones.
I completely agree. I even prefer the X2 to the X2 Vintage.
I give an edge to the TLM103. It sounds more open and natural to his voice. X2 is no slouch though.
What i love bout ur vids is that u dont even have to watch it i can lay in my bed woth closed eyes because u explain everything vocaly anyways
From all of your reviews I have watched, this mic is the one that best suited your voice.
For 200 dollars it's a great sounding microphone IMO. Very nice and balanced and very low noise. I think people should stop comparing this to a Neumann because thats too high of a standard. Although I do think maybe you should do a noise floor test between the X2. To me, my X2 is very quiet compared to other mics I've used including many MXL mics.
I explain exactly why I compared it to the Neumann’s. It’s been done so frequently in other reviews and comments, and even in Tech Zones description for this video, that I figured, I should compare them. As I mentioned in this video, I think it is fine for $200 and an improvement over the at2020 in its smoothness. I think a lot of people in the comments are misinterpreting me saying it’s not a Neumann as me saying it’s shit. No. It’s fine for $200.
@@Podcastage I understand, yes Neumann is a too high standard for it and that makes sense. Just like the more critical reviews they have on amazon stated, its a great mic for 200 but its not Neumann especially not Neumann's build. I do look forward to seeing what the company would do. Are they going to release a more expensive version that is more like the U87 and the Vintage seems interesting... It seems like that model would fit you perfectly especially for your voice.
@@alexmiller6175 I will be testing out the vintage versino when it comes out for sure.
It's a great microphone regardless of its price
TZ=turd zone ''THEE re- builders of BM-800 bottom of the barrel mics.@@Podcastage
There is something really satisfying about watching your videos! Keep up the great work!
Man, I've been wanting to learn more about these since Booth Junkie did his review. Thanks for doing the untreated room test, which not enough people do. I think this mic did reasonably well in that. The comparisons were the most useful part of the test, although I wish you'd included a King Bee as that's what I'm on right now lol. I do think the Stellar sounds as good than the NT1 (although it has its own flavor), which I think is probably its closest competitor in price point and market segment as well as being an industry standard. I did like the Neumanns more... but not that kind of money more!
Your reviews have always been great but they just keep getting better and more complete over time. Thanks for doing this!
You’re on a killer mic right now. (No pun intended). It’s a real sleeper and I was blown away by that mic. I’d pick the king bee over this mic every time.
I agree, I think it sounds very similar to the NT1. Actually sounds slightly similar to the TLM102 too but def closer to the NT1.
@@Podcastage Hi Bandrew. I am having minor buyers remorse of my Rode PodMic based on yours (and others, as well) suggestion of incredible value. I do not totally dislike the microphone or anything, but I can't help but wonder if the amount of gain I have to give the microphone negates the dynamic benefits and makes it just as sensitive in my environment as my old condenser microphone was. Do you think I should try auditioning a King Bee in my untreated space? I feel like being able to turn the gain down and get on the microphone might make it less sensitive than my PodMic at 3 o'clock gain
@@codetanner5128 My question would be, are you hearing excessive hiss in your recording? If not, I don't think you have anything to be concerned with. The podmic will be better at rejecting the room tone from an untreated space compared to the King Bee, just solely based on the fact that the King Bee extends from 20Hz - 20kHz and picks up all of that relatively well. The fact that you're at 3:00 for a dynamic is not in and of it self concerning for a dynamic mic since that's what almost all of them will require.
I don't think it sounds similar to the Nt1...
My three favorite mics in the review were the U87, the TLM103 and surprise surprise.... the Stellar X2. The X2 is clear and has a nice flavor. Thank you so much for the review.
Ive owned 2 of them for like a year and they’re a decent bargain. The rode nt1 is pretty similar, and I’m about the try Acustica LAVA to help it sound even nicer.
I would go with GTZ U 87.
Although the market is pretty rich with microphones of all types in this price range, I can totally see why someone would prefer TZ Stellar X2 over its closest competitors. It might not be warm or bassy, but for some music instruments and voices it really does a good job at emphasizing the detail in the high frequencies. It isn't the same as TLM103, U87 or NT1, but a very decent debut mic. Looking forward to their vintage mic.
I agree completely with this.
It sounds pretty warm and bassy to me
What’s a good condenser around that price range that is warm and bassy. Want to use it for overhead drums
I've had 2 NT1s in the space of a week and both have stopped working! This has got to be better for the reason that Rode made terrible quality products
You have a real gift to make all the mics sound just the same! I've tested most of the ones you've shown and they really sound different but for a reason your super human microphone power makes them sound like if your using only one mic. Cheers
That really inexpensive mic - you said "Neewer 700" but the on-screen graphic and your notes say "Neewer NW7000" - which one was it?
Damn, that U 87 sounds good!
So did the 103!
Haha, not $3200 good. No doubt it's a good mic, but the others sounded good as well.
T3beatz them mics are not even good for them prices 🤣
@@RogwinMusic I hade a 103 some time ago and in my opinion you get what you pay for, good for maybe acoustic guitar, but not close to my U87Ai when I comes to vocals.
@@PinballLunatic You kidding? Vocals are what the TLM 103 does best. The U87Ai has a boxy, nasally sound in comparison to the 103. It's only as expensive as it is because there's two capsules in it instead of just one. It's not a higher quality mic at all; just a different mic. After $1K, it stops being about quality and starts being about preference.
This is a perfect review. Funny and perfectly setup for comparison. You are doing the Lords work. Thank you!
Honestly I got the stellar x2 and got a bit dissapointed at first. Until I started using it in a mix, and especially after boosting the highs for singing it smashed my other mics.
I thought it was rich in highs.
Stellar X2 : 4:12
At2020 : 4:40
RODE NT1 - 5:08
Rosswell 5:33
Neumann TLM 102 : 6:06
TLM 103 : 6:34
-III- U87 AI : 7:09
I was looking fr rode nt1 vs the world so kudos to Bandrew as always . I d love to see how does rode nt1 compares to let s say at2035, lewitt 440pure, king bee and other great value mics in untreated spaces, as we often look fr mics (esp in that price range) to occasionally use them in less than perfect spaces aswell / ppl are also often buying better mic to be more future proof but they d like to start recording in between treatment process . Some controlled background noise, compirasion of echo etc would be amazing for all home studio starters. If anyone would ever make it happen then it s podcastage fr sure :D
That ^ + it would be amazing if he d get some yt singer(or any other that would do it for free) for bigger compirasions aswell. This channel is already the best on yt in terms of mic tests, however additional singing voice (with a different tone than Bandrew s) could make this channel huge even faster, aswell as shutting up all the online fights over the mics as he covers almost everything in his tests
Thanks for comparing all those microphones. It really showed how well the stellar x2 holds up against them. I might be considering purchasing it over the NT1 due to its tone being very similar.
And another thing he sounds best on the Stellar x2... The stellar x2 sounds Fantastic! Very similar to the 103 & U87 if not the better give or take what headphones or monitors you are using! But fast fix to that feeding it through a EQ or Crossover that will fixes your listening process problem! Real talk.
@@rhythmstruck1299 Could not agree more
Good video as always Podcastage.
I think the X2 is impressive. Although It might be the same as a thousand dollar microphone it has a very similar tone to that of the NT1. I have heard much harsher mics at a higher price point. So for $200 although you won't be getting a u87 sound but you will get a balanced sounding mic for a great price.
Lol sorry but there's nothing impressive about that mic. I see that even TechZone themselves wrote in the comments here that the mic is overhyped, and that's exactly what it is.
I bought one refurb from their website for the studio at work, on a budget, and thoroughly happy with the mic, will buy another for the home office.
103 sounded cleaner - but the x2 seems pretty clean too. U87 is flawless
That tlm 102 sounds amazing
Hmm, it sounded muddy and boxey in comparison like it needed a lot of eq. Ymmv
To clarify, the TLM sounded muddy to me, not the X2.
I don't care about comparisons to legendary mics or whether people agree/disagree/rag on it. I think comparisons sound different depending on a number of factors per video...all I know is that this mic consistently sounds great in all reviews I watch. I'm going purely on what it sounds like for itself, and I disagree that it sounds like the 2020...which I am not a big fan of. I've always thought that for the money, if you are going for a 20 series...go for 2035 over 2020, I personally own and love the 4040. To me, this mic is a lot smoother and complete in the frequency ranges that the 2020 is not. 2020 is a little more sibilant (not in a bad way) and lacks some balls in the mid range somewhere, whereas the X2 is just incredibly soft, smooth, and clear. I love it for how it sounds and the fact that it is not made with cheap parts like other mass-produced cheap mics.
The audio does sound like the AT2020, but much sharper than the audio other reviewers have for the X2. One theory I have is that an excessive high-ramp was somehow incorporated into your instance. A ramp of 0dB at 6KHz to -4dB at 12KHz might ease the sibilance and still have the silky sound.. It sounds better in the better-result-reviews. Maybe you are all correct and your serial number is hot at the high end? This happens in electronics sometimes.
Honestly, it sounds good on acoustic guitar.
Yeah not gonna lie it's great for that if you have two.
I agree, in my testing, I found that the X2 did best on acoustic instruments.
I appreciate this review. I was able to hear different mics that Interest me. The TLM 102 is my first choice-that will be the one I work to acquire within 2-yrs. But for now, it’s the NT1 or the Stellar X2. The NT1 sounded brighter; the X2 had more presence & a more even delivery (IMHO). So I will order the X2 regular or vintage. I’ll decide & continue sound treating my walk-in closet & recording room. The real difference will be the work put forth in the shed. Peace.
What would you get for between $200 and 150 for home studio singing recording? Is there anything in this range worth the extra $ over say a AT 2020 or AKG P220? I want something warm, and sing lots of falsetto and also low range. Thanks!
This has a very sweet sound.
finally between an AT4040 and the STELLAR X2 ... which one would you recommend?
Excellent Excellent Excellent comparison! Really enjoy your videos, and the consistency of your demonstrations.
What? No Neumann u47 FET comparison???
Just kidding, it didn't come close to the Neumann mics but I was impressed with how good it sounds. Another 10 years and these "budget microphones" might actually change the game.
what did you listen to it with?
Where to find ALL the gear for this mic? All it's sold is the mic, cover and the holder. What arm do you suggest and where do I get the wires for the mic to connect it with my computer? Please help!
I'm trying to upgrade my XLR from a Samson Co1, is this the best for this price? My price range is only 200.
Oh and this is for voice acting.
Good to see differing opinions. I’m trying to decide on a new mic in this range. I really can’t hear anything as nice as the X2. Though, videos are all i have to go by. So again, it’s nice to hear varying opinions
Maybe it's just my k7xx headphones but the Stellar x2 sounded just as good as the tlm103 and u87 to me. maybe I'm biased because I bought a stellarx2 a few weeks ago but yeah it sounds really good when compared to the two of them and I am very happy with my purchase
It sounds like a good $200 microphone, just not like a Neumann. As long as you are happy and can make good recordings, just enjoy it!
Nah I have a K7xx headphone too and it doesn't sound anywhere near as good as the U87. It's very similar to the Rode NT1.
@@goaway2174 I definitely will, but I am also the type of person who is never fully satisfied so I expect I'll probably get an NT1 sometime soon to see how it sounds on my voice and I'll check out the new tech zone audio products mic when it comes out which is supposed to have a warmer sound
@@Dracomies I can't really hear what makes the Neumann mics sound better. I have very untrained ears though so that's probably why. Like i said in my other comment I'm also planning on getting a rode nt1. My voice is not high pitched or very bassy, I'm like in the middle so I honestly cant hear if the mic is flattering on my voice or not
@@JonathanDano What was also interesting was that another actor (he owns the NT1) bought the X2. He had an AB test between the NT1 and X2. The sound was nearly identical. He added the audio clips in a Discord and people couldn't tell the two apart.
As always, a very good video. Thanks Podcaststage.
Fantastic and comprehensive review. This helped a lot!
-Me knowing the box has a case inside
“OH GOD DID HE TAKE THE CASE OUT FIRST”
Chucks box
Me- oh thank god.
Thank you for doing a comparison on the OGs and for adding music to the testing gauntlet. While for example the Booth Junkie was over the moon about it - and it fits his voice quite well - your voice indeed sounds better on the RØDE NT1, so I know why that’s one of your favorites. I prefer the NT1 overall.
Totally unrelated @podcastage where did you get the wooden vented rack spacers? I tried looking for some but couldn't find any
I suppose it depends on the users voice. To the reviewers with deeper voices like Booth Junkie it sounded really good, but here it doesn't sound so great. As always, excellent review.
As I say in the video I think it’s a fine microphone. I think for $150 to $200 it’s right on par. But is it as awesome as a u87 or TLM103 like so many reviews on youtube and amazon say? No not at all. I think that is incredibly misleading and to my ears, wrong.
Sorry but I think Boot Junkie either did not do an honest review, either he has trouble hearing those high frequencies (later edit: or he got a totally different capsule in his microphone). I really apreciate you did a honest review, @Podcastage, in spite of all the tons of reviewers which sounded like getting a free microphone from those bedroom mic modders guys was enough for them to give away mad props on a mediocre mic that doesn't sound nowhere near neumann mics.
Mike (Booth Junkie) does a video on EQ on his channel and he basically showed that his voice doesn't register on the high frequencies much at all, he could eliminate most of it in EQ (high shelf) and it didn't make a difference. Maybe why the X2 was such a good fit for him. Thanks again, great reviews as always!
Mike actually reviewed a different microphone - different capsule and slight changes to the electronic circuit. It was a prototype with gold grill.
@@goaway2174 yes, he might have to check if the capsule in his is not from the Sennheiser /Neumann spare parts store as 90% of the sound of a mic is in the capsule. Anyway, props to Booth Junkie as he generated a HUGE hype, but at least the shelf product does not deserve the attention, he might indeed gotten something really different.
Great comparison! I actually found it very similar to the NT1 tbh. I did not really found it bright or sharp sounding like you described it. It is not a Neumann for sure though but very similar to the NT1
Not as good as nt1 tho. Nt1 has a more fuller and "dynamic" sound
That Neumann tlm103 sounds amazing
I bought the AKG C214 recently and ordered the Stellar X2 after finding out about it. I just recorded a voice demo with both and I do not see enough of a difference to justify paying twice as much for the C214. Anyone else have opinions on this?
Great video, thanks for the comparisons . I had less than $100 and a boom mic stand so I got the Behringer B-5, I like the sound of this one better than all the mics I tested (I started with the Neewer NW7000). Well except for the Rode NTG2, but it was too expensive for me at the time. So the B-5 it is for me untill I get the, I think it's the Deity S-Mic 2 (the shotgun mic you like)..
Your reviews are great and really detailed, but for me it's pretty difficult to base any kind of decision on someone speaking into a mic, or in this case even playing guitar. The real test for me is always drums. For example the Neewer NW-700 is far too hot to use on drums and distorts easily. Since the output on this one is really high it's probably the same. I really don't see much of a advantage over the NW-700.
There is a review that came out from Sound on Sound
that tested on many applications.
cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0297/1523/4954/files/techzone-stellar-x2.pdf?v=1592599538
@@letsplayhd4345 nothing about drums on there though
That's a whole different purpose.
Here is their sound cloud where you can find many different samples. This is something I submitted to them that you can check out. That was with a matched pair of Stellar X2 and let me tell you, it handles transients very well. You can hear for yourself the clarity when the drums are recorded.
soundcloud.com/user-705791432/stereo-pair-drum-overheads-bamm-bamm-music-ltd?in=user-705791432/sets/voice-over-stellar-x2-samples
thanks and i was about to buy an X2 from the hype i saw, Cheers!
Thanks for the review podcastage. I was recently looking into purchasing a new microphone and I feel the X2 will make a great addition due to its tone being very similar to that of the TLM102.
please bring pizza pronto
You treat those 733t W keys with respect!
Great review. As always. You review the Sennheiser MK4 before. How do you feel this mic compared to the MK4 (vocals, acoustic guitar, ...)? Thanks.
Of all those mics I think you sound the best on the TLM102. Has a really pleasing smoothness to it.
agree. His voice sounds good on the 102.
Is interesting that some new mic brands are coming up and with good quality
My favourites are totally the at2020 and the u 87
I bought one and for my voice it's great but probably wouldn't work for everyone. Also have a avatone c12, and a shure ksm32 .Next song I write I will use the stellar on vocals and see how it works. The avatone is better for acoustic guitar.
It would be be helpful to edit the video so the audio simultaneously changes. The gaps make it a little harder to hear differences between the mics.
For the price point, I’m going with the Neumann Tlm 102. Excellent German compact sound.
I really appreciate your earnestness! I've been checking out your reviews and your genuineness and honesty and solid sense come through. Kudos and keep doing your reviews. I'd be interested in hearing your mixes to see whether those qualities are represented in your technical and musical choices. Would you consider posting some of your work or discuss your approach with some examples?
Another spot-on review. This mic wouldn't work for me because my voice is sibilant, though not high. It's awesome though, to have a product line that includes a variety of mic sounds for each of the different needs.
Regards from italy! I agree with you 100%👍
What type of microphone I can connect "directly" to my laptop?
I mean without using phantom power supply. Using only the XLR to 3.5mm jack cable?
Forget about it. These cables are a travesty. Makes no sense for a condenser (no phantom power), makes little sense for a dynamic (onboard audio mic inputs are generally quite noisy), not to mention that you'd want to record a stereo signal and subtract one channel from the other in order to benefit from the balanced cabling.
If you need just one in the foreseeable future, get a USB mic. Inexpensive ones can sound a bit ragged (thin and scratchy), but I've actually heard some decent ones around the $50 mark (e.g. Samson Meteor, Maono AU-PM401).
Otherwise, assuming you actually still have a dedicated mic/line-in on the computer (most have gone headset jack, which requires a corresponding adapter so you can get a mono input at least), a little compact mixer would give a higher degree of flexibility. I think the Behringer Xenyx 502 is about the cheapest unit with full +48V phantom power, though it is supposed to be a bit noisier than the next model up, the 802, so I'd tend more towards that. I've gone the mixer route since I have an older but still very good quality consumer soundcard.
Plan C is the usual ubiquitous USB audio interface, from the bargain basement Behringer UMC202HD to whatever better-quality model you prefer.
I have this mic and I love it. Maybe it fits with my voice a little better? Good review.
Yes, everyone's voice is different. Podcasting also made it clear that it's not that he hates the microphone it's just it's not Neumann sound.
Yeah. It’s not a bad microphone. It’s just a bit sharper than I’d prefer, and that is far more apparent on other people’s voices. If you have been gifted with a deeper voice like Booth Junkie, it seems to be a much better fit.
Me to, but I have a low voice so that may be the difference
Great review! I bought it based on why he didn't like it lol. It's perfect! Great mic if you want lots of high end detail but without scooped midrange IMO.
I think the NT1 sounds worse than the X2, because the NT1 has too much emphasis on the 'boomy' bass frequencies around 150-300Hz, The K47 sounds too muffled in some frequencies. The X2 has a more natural frequency response in my ears (I'm listening on a Beyer DT770 Pro studio headphone) close to that of the TLM102/103 that both have amazingly natural frequency response across the whole spectrum. The U87ai in my ears sounds better but the difference is minimal. There's a serious case of diminishing returns after the 200 dollar price point. Yes there's a difference, but 99,x% of people will in no way hear the difference anymore (most people don't even hear whether drums are programmed on a PC or not anymore these days...). Whatever you do with post production will likely have a 10 fold higher impact after the NT1 price point, in my opinion. And, that's a great thing. In 2020, excellent microphones are just really affordable!
great comment
Amazing video. My friend was telling me about this mic and was compare it with u87 and other expensive mic.
Great video! I'm curious if you've used the Sontronics STC-2 and if you have an opinion as to how it compares to the Tech Zone Stellar X2 and the King Bee?
STC 20 is also a good mic.
TechZone originally said they were modeling this after the U87 only. Haven’t owned one or heard one but my listening test here was to close my eyes, plug in my Sony MDR7506 monitor headphones and wait till you started speaking into the U87. And to my ears, as produced through these studio headphones, I honestly did not hear a noticeable difference. So to my ears, TechZone achieved a similar sound as designed. That said, I also didn’t hear a significant noticeable difference between the X2 and the AT2020 so a valid point that for $100 less, the AT2020 may be the better investment. For years, I’ve had raving feedback on how well my voice sounds on the USB version of the AT2020 which just makes the point clear that ultimately... all reviews are purely subjective and personal and your voice or purpose for any given mic should be tested individually before coming to a final conclusion ;)
When it comes down to it, content is king. You can absolutely get by with a $100 mic in most applications. Reviews where we nitpick to this level are for nutters. Most people will never hear a difference and it won’t matter unless you’re in a super high end studio with crazy high standards.
Is it good for recording demos?
Very good Review, I really enjoyed it! It would be cool if you add some noise floor test to the comparisons! I recently bought an NT1, cant wait to test it!
Is it good?
It's great!!
Sounds like a winner 👍
This is an amazing mic for $200 but when you compare to the Nuemanns it just lacks that smooth low end.
This had been my best mic so far.Love the lows & highs so crisp.Wonder if sound engineers would be ok with the sparkle though.
The X2 doesn't quite pick up the bass as the Neumanns, but is definitely a very good buy for $200. IMO the average ear can't hear much difference and when mixed with instruments and a little EQ magic, is spending more really worth it?
Love my little TLM 102..
I dunno, on my headphones is really sounded super close to the TLM103, but I completely agree with the upper frequencies.
I would say the biggest winner would be the Rode NT1 or NT1a if you wanna be closer to the Stellar price point.
Through my LCD-2C it sounded about as good as the U87 and had no sibilance
Amazing vid as always, love the methodology of this channel
Pretty good value. Shock mount and fancy case and a piece of foam-- attractive if you're on a budget. But you know what? Audio Technica really owns that $100 dollar market. Pretty wide cardiod pattern on this mic. Lots of plosives. Uh-- That 103 is WORSE than the Stellar? Who is saying that???
I think it did well up against most of the others, just not with the Neumann's or that Roswell.
Who can tell me what to choose ? Aston origin or stellar x2 ?
I saw on your site that you have reviews of the Rode M5 and Se Electronics Se7 coming out.... I'm trying to order a matched pair of one of these either today or tomorrow. Have you done any comparison of these two?
I have not done a comparison of them yet. I haven't even plugged them in once.
@@Podcastage Fair enough. I ordered the Se7 so we'll see how that goes. (Side note you make my favourite review videos. Thanks man)
The CZcams compression is doing what an old valve mic preamp would do, in a way, making them all sound very similar. I have a Rode NT-1 and it is waaaaay smoother, cleaner and quieter than, say, MXL mics. If you have the option to spend money for quality DO!!!
for $200 this actually is very nice sounding
Bandrew, do you know where I can buy this mic? It's not showing up on Amazon if I use your affilated link.
I would check their website!
In my opinion my ear says 😁 NW 7000 Matchable its was outstanding ... While comparing to this Toy 😁
I'm not sure what you mean. You think the NW7000 beat this mic out or vice versa? Regardless, I'm glad that you were able to identify which mic was right for you. happy recording.
Hi, Could you review the Rode NTG4/NTG4+ Condenser Shotgun Microphones please. Could be a AT875R killer?
Why does the stellar x2 sounds in your review sharper than in comparable reviews? czcams.com/video/GcUQE_NyHi4/video.html ...In this review the X2 sounds on par with the Neumann with smooth High End.
I don't hear similar sound with the At2020,i hear similar sound with the NT1.
This thing sounds amazing!
Amazing review 👏👏👏👏👏
First off thank you for a close to honest review and for all of you who purchased this 'mini mic' who were confused by thinking it is made by Stellar, 'THE' microphone company that has been in business for years ? As STELLAR corrected me '' It is not''. TZ sells this pocket sized wonder and I say wonder because l wonder why any one would spend 200.00 on an off brand, so so performing mic ? Podcastage does not want to come right out and tell it's viewers, who already purchased one, that it's an over priced, underperforming product. To balance off all the Phony Hype I forced myself to write this to enlighten all newbie's. There are name brands out there like sE MXL AKG to name just a few that offer so much more for the same price point. The day will come when you get serious about what your doing and will want to move up where the Pro's reign and if you hope to gain their respect ? I'm sure I will get a lot of negative crap from the site's who TZ has sent their FREE mic's to and promised more FREE gear, to evaluate in the future but that's to be understood.
I listened to half of this on my iPad speakers and the second half on my Bose Bluetooth headphones. In other words, the two ways I always listen to CZcams. I barely heard any difference between any of the microphones. In other words, the net sound to my ears was a function of how the video file was compressed, the quality of the sound reproduction of the iPad, the quality of the speakers or the quality of the Bluetooth connection and the headphone speakers. I was really surprised at the summary given how little difference I perceived. My guess is that the presenter had very high quality playback equipment and was listening to a lossless version of the recording.
If I was a podcaster and wanted to choose a nice-sounding microphone that’s would sound good to CZcams listeners, I wouldn’t hesitate spending $200 for this excellent microphone or even a lesser amount for the Audio Technica.
I really don't know what most of the people who hear a difference are talking about cause I don't hear a difference as well and the parts that sound different just may be how he is speaking.
Best test vid out there! Please do the new Stellar X2 VINTAGE vs the Neumann U47 (when you recover from bankruptcy ;-)
Afraid I won’t be able to do a comparison to the U47, because I can’t afford that mic.
@@Podcastage totally understood (the original tube mics go for 10k on ebay). But seriously, test the X2 Vintage if you could vs these same mics.
@@Podcastage Do a comparison to the Roswell MiniK47! The closest thing you have to a U47 I believe haha.
I think the U87 is overrated. The TLM 103 sounds pretty good. The X2 is a bit bright. The NT1 is such a great mic, specially for the price.
1. I could care less (not insulting, just a premise for my comments... in other words, I have no agenda)
2. I've heard no reviews/buzz/hype whatsoever, so whatever that mic is did sound pretty good, with no expectation on my end.
3. It sounded like a decent, cheap China mic. I have some GXLs that I bought about 20 years ago for $80ish. Something like that. Good first mic.
4. It did sound quite similar to the AT2020 (and I do like the AT brand), but I think you said the 2020 is cheaper?
5. It sounded better than most of the other cheap mics you showed (less weird high end crap).
6. The mic is not the most important thing, for people that can't afford $100K in gear. The music and the musical talent are most important. Then, the room you're in. If you don't have these, then don't blow money on gear... just get cheap used stuff, pay with cash (no credit cards), until you do find some talent. Don't obsess about gear until people are paying you big bucks to record an album. Then, let them pay for the gear.
Wise words sir. After 7 years in the game with mxl’s, I’m upping my game with cash with Rme babyface and Austrian Audio 0818.
Bruh I laughed my butt off half way through. Booth junkies reviewed that mic as well.! I'm sold wow!! Thanks
Thanks awesome review as usual! Those Neumann really sounded super smooth, haha that’s the premium $ difference. I’m interested with this mic but after hearing side by side with AT2020 (I have 2035) I might have to pass as I didn’t noticed huge differences.
Great review 👏
I agree based on the comparison made, it’s not comparable to Neumann models.
Yeah thanks for demystifying that hype.. please review the GTZ GototoolZ mic also, quite popular, best to check if that is for real Neumann sounding or not.
Really happy to know that the video helped.
I'll wait for your release of the Raw audio of this video. the CZcams compression messes with the audio too much. cause it does sound like it can be up there with a little tweaking on the youtube video.
hey Bandrew, just asking out of curiosity..why are you doing giveaway..? the other day i read on your website why you don't do giveaways and the reasons you pointed out were actually quite valid..so what made you change your mind..?
Because I’m in a position where I can start give back and work with companies to send stuff to people. And I’m not doing them on youtube really meaning I’m not making a big “giveaway” or putting that in tags or the first three lines of the description so a lot of the people won’t find it that way. And I announce it at the outro where most people who aren’t subscribers have already clicked off. Also, I’m not asking for people to like or subscribe or comment on my videos so it’s not affecting my video performance at all.
@@Podcastage oooof..so thought out as always..love your work man..
Hola no se si alguien sabe español pero quiero saber si el unl directional dynamic microphone ho-304 sirve para cantar y grabar un poco de rap???
Si, pero usa almohadas en los rincones del cuarto
Gracias
Should try to do a Synco Mic-D2 shotgun test! I'd like to see that
I will not be reviewing the Synco. Check this video if you want to know why: czcams.com/video/PB7CGGGaFaw/video.html
Great review
Dear Bandrew, Just an idea, like automated microphone frequency testing:
a tone / frequency generator in front of a microphone and then compare what reaches the audio interface would give a more technical analysis of a microphone, what do you think? Maybe you can address this on the @bandrewsays podcast?
This type of measurement is extremely difficult to do well. There are companies that pay hundreds of thousands, or millions to build anechoic chambers to do these tests. There are some options to do these measurements in a large room you just lose the ability to accurately measure the low frequencies. But I don’t have a big enough room for that method either.