AMD 65W Review - Ryzen 7 7700 & Ryzen 9 7900

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 30. 06. 2024
  • Today Luke checks out the latest line of processors from AMD - the new low power 65W Ryzen 5 7600, Ryzen 7 7700 and Ryzen 9 7900. Are they any good and do you need to buy one? We find out today. Read more in the written article here: bit.ly/3ikvYcH
    00:00 What's this then?
    01:56 Some details / test procedures
    04:07 The new CPU frequencies / PBO
    06:08 Power Consumption / Temperatures
    07:48 Blender/Cinebench/Handbrake/7 Zip/3DMark
    10:47 Gaming Performance 1080p
    12:12 Performance per Watt
    12:52 Luke's Closing Thoughts
    Discord invite link: / discord
    Steam Community steamcommunity.com/groups/kit...
    Be sure to support us on PATREON / kitgurutech and read our MANTRA on HONEST REVIEWS Here: bit.ly/2BopnF9
    KitGuru uses a variety of equipment to produce content:
    As of May 2019:
    Panasonic GH5 and GH5s Cameras
    Panasonic GH4 Cameras
    Panasonic G7 Cameras
    DJI OSMO Pocket Cameras
    Canon Cameras
    Various PC builds
    Final output - colour grading/titling etc:
    iMac Pro 18 Core/Vega 64/128GB
    iMac 2019 9900k Vega 48/64/1TB
    Adobe Premiere Pro CC (PC)
    Davinci Resolve Studio 14/15 (Mac)
    iPad Pro 12.9 inch (2018) machines with LumaFusion
    Final Cut Pro (Mac)
    Visit our facebook page over here! / kitguru.net
    Visit our Twitter page over here! kitgurupress?lang=en
    #AMD #ryzen #7600 #7700 #7900
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 124

  • @user-yz7lx3jy7o
    @user-yz7lx3jy7o Před 8 měsíci +7

    Just got a 7700 non x . Running 5150mhz with pbo curve -30. Never goes above 70c in games. Never seen it go over 80w in power consumption either.
    Those who go the intel route, good luck. We know they are better in some instances, but not at such a low power consumption. My previous intel could easily double as a room heater.

  • @lucifersheadscarf6988
    @lucifersheadscarf6988 Před rokem +26

    Great idea, getting under 100W for this kind of performance is very impressive. I like that strategy - I can even live with the pricing, quality release from AMD - well done !

    • @tilapiadave3234
      @tilapiadave3234 Před rokem

      Pricing BUT don't you need a motherboard at CRZY price ? Aren't you FORCED to use DDR5 at CRAZY prices

    • @larwiemcdonnel5322
      @larwiemcdonnel5322 Před rokem +11

      But isn’t the platform going to last longer ? Investment now. Less later ?

    • @bobsmithson8592
      @bobsmithson8592 Před rokem +1

      It’s a lot of money to change but maybe in the long run it’s worth it. I couldn’t afford it myself.

  • @MichaelW1980randoms
    @MichaelW1980randoms Před 4 měsíci +3

    I wouldn’t want a CPU that cooks itself. So the non X models are a blessing!

  • @michaelthompson9798
    @michaelthompson9798 Před rokem +11

    Thanks Luke 👍🥰😇 for your time spent on this review and testing! I feel the non-X cpus this generation for AMD are the better choice for many ….both gamers and creators alike. The lower price, lower power requirements and better value makes these a lot better value for consumers and deliver ~98% of the performance of the X-series lineup by AMD 🤯🔥💪🥳. I was considering in the future the X-line up or the X3D, but it seems for me, as an ITX builder, the non-X is the way to go 💪🍻. Cheers buddy.

  • @esimkalel515
    @esimkalel515 Před rokem +1

    That’s a fantastic test setup you’ve got there.

  • @buyingastairwaytoheaven5252

    Loads of detail luke. Quality review mate

  • @nalalin8835
    @nalalin8835 Před rokem +3

    This video is so helpful! I was trying to decide between a 7700 and a 7900 then after seeing the benchmarks presented in this video I realized 7700 will be more than enough for everyday computing and occasional gaming that I do. Thank you so much for putting this video together!!

    • @norge696
      @norge696 Před 8 měsíci +1

      How is your 7700?!?!!? I plan on getting one soon!

  • @mintydog06
    @mintydog06 Před rokem +3

    Great review! I'm thinking of going for the 7700 or 7900. I prefer to have a more efficient, and cooler CPU, than one that runs really hot. And I don't want to watercool, so I also like the included cooler.
    I currently have a 1700 and using the included cooler with that, and it's still running fine, even under full load Radeon software reports its only 61 degrees.
    I was going to wait for the 7800X3D, but decided I'd rather save the money, since I'm sure the 7700 or 7900 with perhaps a 6800xt will keep me going as long as the 1700 and Vega 64 have done. Plus AM5 entry price is quite high, so I've got to save money somewhere :)
    Also it's good to see a UK channel. Do you know when these are released in the UK? It seems that retails have NO information on their page about release date. The keynote said today, but their own page says 14th Jan. Pretty shoddy launch.

  • @oliverturner128
    @oliverturner128 Před rokem

    Great review Luke, thanks

  • @inlovewithmycar7085
    @inlovewithmycar7085 Před rokem

    Been waiting on these for a while, for my new system in the main living room - bookmarked for later!

  • @erdipar7608
    @erdipar7608 Před rokem +4

    Way better running temperatures - won’t need an AIO water cooled solution for one of these.

  • @AvroBellow
    @AvroBellow Před 2 měsíci

    These are the CPUs that most people should be buying. If I didn't already have a stellar AM4 platform setup, that R7-7700 would be my pick of the three. I currently use an AMD Wraith Prism on my R7-5800X3D and it works beautifully! I have a Wraith Spire RGB as my backup cooler but, let's be honest here... Air coolers don't die. My AM2+ cooler (which I have affectionately named "Baby Wraith") that came with my Phenom II X4 940 back in 2008, still works perfectly. It's really quite amazing that it does because I used that Baby Wraith for my Phenom II X4 940. Phenom II X4 965 and even my FX-8350 (because the AM3 cooler was absolutely horrible). That's seven straight years of use and it's still a working CPU cooler today. The Phenom II and FX CPUs weren't exactly low-power and cool-running CPUs with both having TDPs of 125W.
    If yo'u're a gamer like me, then liquid cooling is a complete waste of money as a stock AMD air cooler will work just fine. I just wish that AMD would dump the Wraith Stealth cooler and bring back the Wraith Spire because that was also an awesome cooler. My stepfather bought a Ryzen 9 3900X which came with a Wraith Prism. The problem is that he's old-school and HATES RGB lighting. My R5-3600X came with a Wraith Spire and I never even opened it because I like RGB and was quite happy with the Wraith Spire RGB that came with my R7-1700.
    However, one day I was swapping out a motherboard for him and he asked me if I knew how to "turn that goddamn RGB off" on the Wraith Prism. I truthfully told him that I didn't and asked him what the problem was. He told me that he found RGB to be "Gaudy and Tacky" so I offered to trade him my unopened Wraith Spire for his Wraith Prism. He said as long as it could cool his R9-3900X (which incidentally has a TDP of 65W), he would love to make that trade.
    Well, I popped the Wraith Spire onto his R9-3900X, ran some tests using Prime95 and Passmark Burn-in and there was only some mild throttling after about five minutes of Prime95. He said that he was perfectly happy with that because he doesn't do anything even remotely as strenuous as Prime95. I was absolutely thrilled to get the Prism because I think that it's one of, if not the, most beautiful CPU air cooler ever made. I didn't even mind relegating my Wraith Spire to perpetual emergency backup status (perpetual because, again, air coolers never die).

  • @canarychrome7012
    @canarychrome7012 Před rokem +4

    A luke review, almost as good as a leo review ! thanks!

  • @iamChermac
    @iamChermac Před rokem

    What offset did you try with Curve Optimiser?

  • @vh9network
    @vh9network Před rokem +2

    Looking at the Ryzen 9 7900 R23 stock performance, my tuned 5900X is right behind it, hitting 23.6K with PBO/Curve Optimizer.

    • @bastianm5478
      @bastianm5478 Před rokem

      Interesting, this is exactly what I wanted to know. But I still can't get myself to buy am4 just to save 200-300 usd..

  • @omuleanu
    @omuleanu Před rokem

    I see the 13600K twice 115W 4.7GHz and 168W, is this some sort of setting that you change in the BIOS ? what is the default behaviour ? 115W or 168W ?

  • @petmey5281
    @petmey5281 Před 6 měsíci +1

    I'm fixing to start a mini-itx build using the 7900 mated to a 4060 solo. Going to be a mean little package using the smallest mini-itx case I could find (JOYJOM Mini ITX PC Case with PCI Riser,)

  • @oyunprosu5207
    @oyunprosu5207 Před rokem +5

    Wow that’s really power efficient especially compared to the X versions.

  • @mordavian
    @mordavian Před rokem

    Best test results video for these Cpu's.

  • @asdf51501
    @asdf51501 Před rokem +2

    I bought a 7900 non-x, and I'm debating whether to make this a Win10/11 machine or a Linux PC of some sort. The electrical system in my house will be happy with the reduced power usage.

  • @xyr3s
    @xyr3s Před rokem +1

    Sad, I was gonna get the 7700x so I bought an arctic freezer a35 rgb cooler for 45 aud. Now I was thinking of going 7900 cos more cores. But what would I do with the stock cooler?

  • @bavarianwolf3806
    @bavarianwolf3806 Před rokem +1

    i really interested in the 7700 with 65 W. Its like 40 W less then the 7700x so its basiclly the eco mode but cheaper and less temps

  • @MarkThomas-nu7hp
    @MarkThomas-nu7hp Před měsícem +1

    Upgrade question: My computer main components are MSI MPG X670E Carbon WiFi motherboard, MSI 3060 X12g GPU (Nvidia), 64 GB Kingston Beast DDR5 4800 memory, 850 watt power supply, Ryzen 7 7700 CPU (65w version). This is NOT used for gaming, but used for photo editing, specifically astro photos where 'stacking' is heavily used and the main programs are 'Pixinsight' and 'Affinity Photo' . I'm trying to figure out if I would gain anything significant by upgrading to the Ryzen 9 7900 CPU (65w version) and keeping all the other components the same. I have PBO enabled but no other tweaks. Can't find any good answers on the web so I'm asking the 'experts' here. Thanks!

  • @JourneysADRIFT
    @JourneysADRIFT Před rokem +2

    Killer chip for ITX builds. Now if only there were more ITX boards for AM5.

  • @Paolo0902
    @Paolo0902 Před 4 měsíci

    I am just debating upgrading my personal PC from i5-3570 cpu (I know it is old) to probably Ryzen 9 7900 (non X), because of power consumption. I use PC for a little gaming and most for productivity. I know that X3D versions are rated at 120W TDP. Is the gain in performance will justify to go for X3D version of 7900 versus price difference?

  • @historianfabulousio5128

    Awesome t hanks LUKE!

  • @PaulyDownUnder
    @PaulyDownUnder Před 7 měsíci

    Newbie question: Does PBO only work with non-'X' CPUs or can it be turned on for 'X' CPUs? If so, would the 7700X for example, perform even better again??

  • @victerino
    @victerino Před rokem

    Are you able to choose how much overclock do you want with pbo? Cause its such a huge jump with it from 90W to 180W. It would be a good thing to have something in the middle like 130W.

    • @justindavis7600
      @justindavis7600 Před rokem

      Yeah I was thinking the same thing. What system you running now ? I’d like to move to this platform myself.

    • @victerino
      @victerino Před rokem

      @@justindavis7600 im running i7 9700k and i want to switch to amd right now for 7900 non x.

    • @cobalt8421
      @cobalt8421 Před rokem

      @@victerinoYou won't regret it.
      i did the jump from a 9900kf to a ryzen 9 7900 and i'm really happy with it, less power consumption and better temps, idle temp 38 and 48 in games with a dark rock pro 4.

    • @TheMrmomo55
      @TheMrmomo55 Před rokem

      I was thinking the same, setting the 7900 to a 105W TDP max 141W consumption while still having better efficiency and temperatures. Would be interesting to know. Also does it effect the non X variants in a negative way to activate PBO? It shouldnt be, because they are basically X Cpus with a limit, so its not overclocking basically.

  • @nick711ful
    @nick711ful Před 5 měsíci

    Thank you, sir!

  • @boltsandbraces6261
    @boltsandbraces6261 Před rokem +4

    I just saw the prices of these, holy cat flaps batman !

  • @buddahbud1
    @buddahbud1 Před měsícem

    Thanx am just planning to upgrade from my ryzen 5900x system. This 7700 or 7900 will do well for my photography work ... be well.

  • @noisedll5611
    @noisedll5611 Před rokem +5

    So the X versions of the chips really are not worth it then considering the extra heat and cost.

    • @xyr3s
      @xyr3s Před rokem

      Doesn't the CPU put out performance up until cpu hits 95°?? So wouldn't a CPU with a lower Max limit put out less performance? Depending on the cooler ofc. Or is that not how it works?

    • @TheMrmomo55
      @TheMrmomo55 Před rokem

      ​​@@xyr3s yes, but its this way only for high tdp CPUs who get very hot. The cpu throttles as soon as you hit max temp with max TDP. You will first hit max tdp, as soon as you hit max temp, you clock speeds would throttle.
      lowering the Cpu max temp. Should force the Cpu to draw less Power, resulting slightly lower boost speeds. You could limit the 7900x to 85 max temp. This would force the cpu to automatically lower the TDP, while dont having a very significant performance loss. So its a good way to make your system more efficient.

  • @mihaibosoiu9637
    @mihaibosoiu9637 Před rokem

    So can I use the wraith prism on my 7900?

  • @VicharB
    @VicharB Před 2 měsíci

    Last week upgraded ny 5600x/asus b450/32GB 3200 to 7700/B650M PG Riptide/KingBank 6400 CL32, and with tweaks I have quite happy with the final results:
    BIOS Settings:
    Memory = 6400 @CL30/38/38/80 1.4V
    FCLK = 2133
    UCLK=MEMCLK/2 (My system fails if I run 1:1 UCLK=MEMCLK)
    PBO: Advanced/Motherboard, Scaller 10X, Positive 200
    CO: All core, Negative, -30
    iGPU = Disabled
    BIOS Thermal Limit = 89C
    Cinebench R23 Multi/Single = ~19,200/~2000 (~44-46W/~114-116W)
    Idle = ~49-51C (Windows 11; room temp ~23C)
    Games max 92C
    Load (Cinebench R23)
    All core=5.1-5.2hz @89.4C
    Single Core = 5.49Ghz (59-60C)

  • @geofftatesmate7748
    @geofftatesmate7748 Před rokem +1

    Thanks Luke these are a great idea. But the prices seem a bit excessive. Then again everything costs a fortune in 2023 😮

  • @amdforlife5591
    @amdforlife5591 Před rokem +2

    Great review on two new class leading processors. Intel must be sweating buckets ! ❤

  • @kolesamet4961
    @kolesamet4961 Před rokem +1

    Fair play to AMD for trying to make their platform more competitive.

  • @antos1951
    @antos1951 Před rokem +1

    i have a ryzen 5700x and im just wondering do u think it would be worth it to upgrade im thinking to get a rtx 4080 and im not sure if a 5700x would be a big bottleneck?

    • @pedromvuus
      @pedromvuus Před rokem +1

      I am assuming with that card you would be playing in 4K, haven't seen videos on this particular topic, but Hardware Unboxed summary puts the 7700 around 35% higher average fps than 5700x at 1080p with rtx 4090
      So based on other Hardware unboxed numbers of average fps at 4K, I don't think it will matter, at 1440p maybe, but this is based on averages, it will depend on specific games and what framerate you target

    • @pedromvuus
      @pedromvuus Před rokem

      Found one, in short, not worth it with 4090 so even less with 4080 czcams.com/video/yqviii515kI/video.html

    • @powermaster5004
      @powermaster5004 Před rokem +1

      Yeah it wouldn’t matter imo

    • @antos1951
      @antos1951 Před rokem

      Yea i would be playing mostly in 4k. And maybe odd times in 1440p
      So i should be ok mostly then?

    • @justindavis7600
      @justindavis7600 Před rokem +1

      Yeah you will be fine pedro. It’s more gpu limited at 4k

  • @omuleanu
    @omuleanu Před rokem +1

    btw I think on idle the intels draw much less power than AMD (something like 5W vs 50W AMD)

  • @gtansiklopedisi5196
    @gtansiklopedisi5196 Před rokem +2

    So just but a non-x chip and overclock it and you’ve got basically the same performance for way less money.

  • @overclockingdemon7179

    Good to see AMD making chips with LESS power demand, shall watch this after work, the prices seem quite high however on first look ..

    • @tilapiadave3234
      @tilapiadave3234 Před rokem

      Yes ,, they use far more than Intel in real world ,,, I wonder if these non x chips still use 48 watts at IDLE?

    • @powermaster5004
      @powermaster5004 Před rokem

      Lukes idle tests in this review show much higher than 65w

  • @justbegula
    @justbegula Před rokem +1

    7900 or 7700X? Got a 1440p screen, fits in budget, and have a PSU that supports all of these.

    • @joepiazza3756
      @joepiazza3756 Před rokem

      If it's just for gaming and general processes then it's 7700x. This set of gaming reviews isn't really the best.

    • @cobalt8421
      @cobalt8421 Před rokem +2

      i say the 7900, much easier to cool and better power efficiency.

    • @TheMrmomo55
      @TheMrmomo55 Před rokem +1

      If you are also doing some productivity like video editing and 3D the 7900 seems to be an amazing option. You will also benefit from multicore Performance in the near future. You could built a monster productivity and gaming machine while having basically a silent Pc when you use a decent cooler like noctua.

    • @guto2755
      @guto2755 Před rokem

      7900

  • @shahrukhwolfmann6824
    @shahrukhwolfmann6824 Před rokem

    Cheers

  • @TechGamer-pq1gu
    @TechGamer-pq1gu Před rokem

    looks like they got a dud for the 7700 which didn't OC very well which is within my experience with all non X Ryzen CPU's.

  • @hairsprungdutchtechnique9626

    ohhhh 65W Ryzen chips very nice indeed !

  • @MximRyzen
    @MximRyzen Před 7 měsíci

    Does anyone use the Ryzen 9 7900 (non X) in mining... how does it perform in mining using the randomX algorithm?

  • @rufusmctavish1164
    @rufusmctavish1164 Před rokem

    How much are they?

  • @DereckR
    @DereckR Před rokem

    I mean losing like 5 to 10% of performance and using less power. Thats pretty good. Im down for it.

  • @SoarDoesGaming
    @SoarDoesGaming Před 11 měsíci

    i dont get how my 240mm aio cooled 7700 is still going to 95c all the time...

    • @partenopis7604
      @partenopis7604 Před 5 měsíci

      Attenzione al dissipatore . Alcuni di essi anche se compatibili con Am5 non aderiscono alla perfezione sulla CPU che e leggermente diversa fisicamente . Oltrettutto la pasta termica mettila distesa completamente sulla CPU con una palettina con strato fine e non utilizzare la pallina al centro .

  • @marvel764
    @marvel764 Před rokem

    The board price dont matter it is upgradable for a couple years its an investment.

  • @kingarthur7250
    @kingarthur7250 Před rokem

    Am5 is great ..but as it involves a new mb..ddr5 ram...and pu thats alot to pay out for when am4 running just fine.

  • @OptLab
    @OptLab Před rokem +2

    Idle power consumption please. Most power time is used at idle and light loads

    • @SirWolf2018
      @SirWolf2018 Před rokem +1

      Yeah I want to know too!

    • @tilapiadave3234
      @tilapiadave3234 Před rokem

      probably same 48 Watts for AMD ,, 9 watts for Intel ... But the SHILLS keep going with the LIES than AMD uses less power ,, that is simply untrue in REAL WORLD usage

    • @SirWolf2018
      @SirWolf2018 Před rokem

      @@tilapiadave3234 There are some numbers shown by reviews on the Internet, about 10W more than previous generation.

    • @OptLab
      @OptLab Před rokem +1

      ​@@tilapiadave3234 the problem is that many websites or reviewers don't want to spend too much time. Many don't have the knowledge and only want free gear and grow the channel. Some don't mind pushing for more consumption as it forces the consumer to upgrade the psu, screen and every part. By the way, the 5600G and 3600 seem to have lower power consumption, the other recent Ryzens on steroids do spend more at idle. But please don't mix total pc power and cpu power :)

    • @tilapiadave3234
      @tilapiadave3234 Před rokem

      @@OptLab Agree it is somewhat time consuming but i also feel it is a VERY important number we all should know. The AMD shills that keep spreading lies regarding the "efficiency" of AMD need to be called out. I am NOT anti AMD in any way but REAL LIFE facts need to be shown.
      See here for the "beginnings" of the truth coming out : czcams.com/video/JHWxAdKK4Xg/video.html

  • @thelasthallow
    @thelasthallow Před rokem

    i dont get why nearly every review ive seen the a 5800x they can only get it to run at around 4.5GHz stable, with some minor tweaking im able to get my 5800X to all core boost to 4.7GHz, and under ligher workloads like gaming easily 4.9GHz, and i havnt even touched the voltage yet, its all stock settings in the bios. and if you just comment to tell me that its not stable, ive been running it this way for 6+ months and i have multiple weeks of up time usually 2+ weeks before i need to restart. EDIT: so far 4.92GHz stable for over a week now, still stock voltage settings. im gonna get that 5GHz baby.

  • @ghv2717
    @ghv2717 Před rokem +1

    The platform looks really good but it requires such a lot of investment its virtually a whole new PC.

    • @Penfolduk001
      @Penfolduk001 Před rokem

      Well when Intel 14th Gen comes along, that is almost certainly a whole new PC anyway. So once you take the leap on AMD, you're probably going to get more years of upgradeability out of it.

    • @powermaster5004
      @powermaster5004 Před rokem

      But it should last a lot longer. Saving money in the long run. But you make a good point.

    • @nostrum6410
      @nostrum6410 Před rokem

      well ya,new board, ram and cpu is basically a new pc

  • @stickyfingers9710
    @stickyfingers9710 Před rokem +2

    well its not really 65W - even the review shows its closer to 90w ....

    • @chippyjohn1
      @chippyjohn1 Před 8 měsíci

      65W is heat output, not power consumed. TDP is basically the efficiency rating for electronic devices. 65W is quite efficient.

  • @cuongtang9539
    @cuongtang9539 Před rokem

    i like the 13600k more. i dont like this new head spreader

  • @trilexi
    @trilexi Před rokem

    Why would anyone buy the 7900X Instead of the 7900 ? I don't see any downside

    • @vh9network
      @vh9network Před rokem

      My guess, for those who want the top performance out the box and requires little to no BIOS tweaking would be the case, which has always been the case with X CPUs until ZEN3 came, and X CPUs had more room under the hood to go even further through tweaking.
      Looks like AM5 is back to the old ways. X CPUs you get top speed, requires little effort . Non-X you got to either tweak or have a good bin to match an X, or you aren't concerned with top / matching X performance and interested in lower power consumption.

  • @MARCO-vj9oy
    @MARCO-vj9oy Před rokem

    7900 é muito eficiente , se fizer as contas no final do ano o que economizou de energia dá pra comprar um intel i7 e ainda sobra dinheiro, kkkkkkkkk

    • @Xulusbangos
      @Xulusbangos Před 9 měsíci

      Comprei um Ryzen 9 7900 de um amigo, o processador é novo e ele me vendeu por um preço bacana. Agora quero comprar uma gpu, mas quero que fique bem equilibrado, sabe? Pra que não fique com gargalo. É meu primeiro Pc, então se você puder me recomendar uma placa de vídeo seria de grande ajuda.

    • @MARCO-vj9oy
      @MARCO-vj9oy Před 9 měsíci

      a minha placa mãe é uma B650 AORUS ELITE AX - memorias 16x2 - 32 GB - dois SSD 1 TB ( UM 990 PRO SAMSUNG E OUTRO NETAC NV7000 + UM EVO 870 EVO SATA (BACKUP + HD 1TB (BAKUP DO BAKUP) minha placa video é uma 2080 TI 11 GB , roda qualquer coisa e um pouco mais, uso pra meus projetos - REVIT , NAVIS, CIVIL 3D , CAD, PROGRAMS DE CALCULOS ESTRUTURAIS e logico jogos................. MAIS EU POSSO TE DIZER QUE QUALQUER RX5700 XT OU 2060 SUPER VAI DE BOA , ou uma 3060 TI vai ficar tranquilo

  • @JS-wl3gi
    @JS-wl3gi Před 10 měsíci

    I only go for the 65w now, and you really give up almost nothing in really world production

  • @Direwoof
    @Direwoof Před rokem

    Teh processor price doesnt bother me, its teh motherbaords and ram still way overpriced. 200+ doubloons for entry level is not cool.

  • @JayzBeerz
    @JayzBeerz Před 7 měsíci +1

    Not really 65W as my 7600 went to 105W during gaming.

  • @ikaan6937
    @ikaan6937 Před rokem

    This is way more like it from AMD.

  • @Last_Tutmos
    @Last_Tutmos Před rokem

    B650 AM5 board with huge price increase is compared to B550 is no go for me any time soon.
    That boards should not cost more then $100$ - $120.
    With price $200 for cheapest B650 board this is begging of the end of PC gaming.
    Everyhing is so expensive that I will not spend a single coin any more on hardware.

    • @chippyjohn1
      @chippyjohn1 Před 8 měsíci

      It's expensive because less and less computers are being sold. My computer is 12 years old and still works fine. Most people have a far more powerful computer than they need.

  • @Oceanborn712
    @Oceanborn712 Před rokem

    X-rated siblings? 🤔

  • @lightward9487
    @lightward9487 Před rokem

    Lo siento mucho, amd no tiene ventaja porque i9 13900ks ha vuelto de mundo contra ventajas de amd ni un brillo!! Te dije tan cuidado por intel mas ventajas peligrosas, mejor no seras capaz de saber imposible, amd no tiene ventaja? No necesita placa madre AM5? Un ejemplo amd sin am5 no se puede hacer nada, intel es unico varias ventajas usa liga 1850 contra am5

    • @partenopis7604
      @partenopis7604 Před 5 měsíci

      Mai intel.macsrnlre ryzen consumi più bassi . Ciao 😂

  • @nostrum6410
    @nostrum6410 Před rokem

    still prefer 13th gen intel, but I can see a use for a 7900 especially. 13600k is superior to 7600 and 7700 in any way I care about

  • @smallgames1715
    @smallgames1715 Před rokem +1

    Still prefer the Intel 13th gen..

  • @tyrand
    @tyrand Před rokem

    14:47 - It's £439.99 😩