Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Profile vs Runout for GD&T Applications

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 16. 08. 2024
  • This video shows the coaxial controls of total runout and profile tolerance per ASME Y14.5 on coaxial shafts. It shows the differences between them as well as practical applications of where to use one versus the other.
    ►► Check out our self-paced online GD&T course→ GeoTol Pro 2020: bit.ly/GeoTolP...
    ►► Check out our GD&T workbook to ASME Y14.5-2018 and ISO-GPS→ GeoTol Pro 2020: bit.ly/GeoTolPro2020Book
    GeoTol Inc. is a full-service training and consulting firm on geometric dimensioning and tolerancing. Please visit our website for information regarding onsite training, online training, virtual training, consulting, books, pocket guides, DVD video, leader PowerPoint and model set packages.
    www.geotol.com

Komentáře • 22

  • @randatatang9222
    @randatatang9222 Před 11 měsíci +3

    Still my best gd&t and gps go-to guy. Thanks 😁

  • @sem7207
    @sem7207 Před 11 měsíci +1

    Fantastic explanation! 👏👏👏

  • @Ashnek34
    @Ashnek34 Před 9 měsíci +1

    Great content

  • @axeonhand
    @axeonhand Před 9 měsíci +1

    Well explained video

  • @printlife9016
    @printlife9016 Před 11 měsíci

    Thanks. That's very informative and helpful!

  • @DS-hz4ie
    @DS-hz4ie Před 10 měsíci

    On the first example: For profile I thought you could add a tolerance to the diameter if you wanted. In that case the profile would not control the size but it would still control the location, form, and orientation. Is this correct? Does the diameter need to be a basic if we use profile?

    • @GeoTolPro
      @GeoTolPro  Před 10 měsíci

      Profile tolerance requires a true profile to be equally disposed about. The true profile (the diameter in this case) is set by basic dimensions. Runout requires the separate size and runout tolerance.

  • @Norse1957
    @Norse1957 Před 10 měsíci

    We have a part drawing for a long cylindrical component that has a sharp point at the end (made by grinding 3 flat surfaces at an angle). We currently have called out on the drawing a runout of 0.1mm for the sharp tip. But a vendor we sent the drawing to is saying we should use "position" rather than runout. This component is spun in a drill for driving it into bone, and if the point is off center, it will not behave properly. Which do you recommend, runout or position?

    • @GeoTolPro
      @GeoTolPro  Před 10 měsíci

      The feature is circular, right? It sounds like the surface of this feature is important and not just the "axis of the mating envelope". Circular runout seems like the best option to keep that "surface centered"

  • @kaushikiyer9445
    @kaushikiyer9445 Před 10 měsíci

    Hey, great video. I have one doubt though. On the brake drum example, why not use profile by adding size and runout tolerance to profile. So that would be profile tolerance of 0.025 inches?

    • @anantakumar3581
      @anantakumar3581 Před 10 měsíci

      What is the future of this gdnt and Siemens nx and package after 3YOE IN India?

    • @kaushikiyer9445
      @kaushikiyer9445 Před 10 měsíci

      @@anantakumar3581 wrong tag?

    • @anantakumar3581
      @anantakumar3581 Před 10 měsíci

      @@kaushikiyer9445 I am asking about package. What is wrong tag....

    • @GeoTolPro
      @GeoTolPro  Před 10 měsíci

      The function of the brake drum is to have a large size tolerance but tight runout. If it were converted to profile tolerance, the size would be basic. Then you must have a single value for size and coaxiality. You lose the large size tolerance that runout allows.

    • @kaushikiyer9445
      @kaushikiyer9445 Před 10 měsíci

      ​@@GeoTolProbut as you said, it is easier to maintain coaxiality on a lathe than size. So maybe that machine is able to achieve coaxiality of 0.003 and the remaining 0.002 can be used as an extra size tolerance adding to a total of 0.022 size tolerance

  • @asaholey
    @asaholey Před 4 měsíci

    Can i use total runout as secondary datum?

    • @GeoTolPro
      @GeoTolPro  Před 4 měsíci

      Not sure I understand your question. Total runout is a geometric tolerance. A datum is an axis or plane.
      I assume you are asking: can I tolerance a secondary datum feature with total runout?
      The answer is usually no. Runout must reference a datum axis. If your primary datum is a plane, then no. If your primary datum is an axis, then a perpendicular planar feature may be controlled with runout. However, I recommend a simple perpendicularity in that case.

    • @asaholey
      @asaholey Před 4 měsíci

      @@GeoTolPro in the brake drum example when you add the total runout to the diameter of the brake drum which is 10 inches, is that the same as point the runout to the outer diameter? In my understanding is that when you put the fcf in the diameter, you are controlling the axis

    • @asaholey
      @asaholey Před 4 měsíci

      I think your answer contradicts this video, which suggests that runout can be used as a datum: czcams.com/video/NE7qDGybv5U/video.htmlsi=E7x0SqQy3PLI3uWH
      Each person with different interpretation of the gd&t standard?

    • @GeoTolPro
      @GeoTolPro  Před 2 měsíci

      A runout tolerance may be used to control a primary set of common datum features (A-B).
      A runout is a tolerance not a feature. You are getting your terms mixed up.