MILO MANARA & PAT ANDREA Jam (Huberty Breyne Gallery, Brussels)

#Manara #bandedessinée #drawing #comicsart Watch as the Italian master of erotica shares the canvas with Dutch neo-figurative painter, sculptor, and magic realist Pat Andrea in a titanic live draw-off. It becomes clear that Manara needs no models to fashion his classic beautés nues.

[@afroscifizianzcomix7836]

Thanks for posting.
I know next to nothing about these guys. Thanks for the education. Time to research. 👍

[@GodLovesComics]

I knew zero about Pat Andrea, but Manara is hugely famous. Marvel actually commissioned him to do a series of covers years ago and his version of Spider-Woman immediately caused an uproar and was pulled from the shelves. He's also gotten one of my videos Age-Restricted ;)

[@afroscifizianzcomix7836]

@God Loves Comics ahhh yes. I remember the Spider-Woman art.
WOW.

[@GodLovesComics]

@@afroscifizianzcomix7836 He also did an X-Women comic where all the female mutants effectively look like blow-up dolls ;) I included the Spider-Woman cover in two different videos talking about either Manara or censorship (the Saga video). And guess what...both got censored! I'd rather take my chances with Wertam than current CZcams or the woke mob. At least Wertham was an intellect.

[@afroscifizianzcomix7836]

@God Loves Comics I'll have to look that up. Lol. BTW there seems to be a lot of censorship and demonetization of certain videos from certain channels at the moment. Strange Brain Parts just had his Authority video demonitized and age restricted. It made me think about what happened to your channel .I honestly don't understand it. CZcams would rather promote mud slinging comic videos rather than intelligent debates and critiques. I don't get it.

[@GodLovesComics]

​@@afroscifizianzcomix7836 Really there is no rhyme or reason. I fully understand why CZcams cannot review every one of the zillions of videos that are uploaded daily, and why they will never tell you specifically what is offensive or needs to be removed from a video. That reason is clear: I get a video Age-Restriicted for cartoon nipples and if they specify that, then I can so easily come back with 100 examples of videos with not only comic book nipples, but real women exposing them. So they keep it willfully vague. But they also have far more categories that you can report for sexual content than for violent content. The most blatant example is there is a Report category for "Graphic Sexual Content" (which is intentionally subjective). But there is no corresponding category for "Graphic Violent Content." And yet my Frazetta video, which is so obviously a researched, historical and academic-oriented video was flagged for "Shocking, Adult Content." Meanwhile, just a week ago I waw served a video on YT that was about the brutral retribution murder of a female Mexican cartel member and it had her body on the thumbnail! And the whole channel was dedicated to greusome crime scenes. Similarly, the Age-Restriction for the Manara/Bilal original art video was because of the Cat Goddesses nipples in Nikopol. It took me 30-seconds to find a video about Nikopol where the thumbnail showed a main female character completely nude and pregnant. These are the thumbnails! And of course a verrry popular comics channel's most-watched videos are on Penthouse Comics, and Wally Wood's porn comix in which they show ample illustrations of graphic sex and nudity (fine by me), but with no evidence they are restricted and certainly their channel wasn't deleted. The irony is that the larger the channel the less likely they face any restrictions although so many more people are seeing the content. Instead, the smaller channels which are seen by few (and thus not remotely as influential or corrupting) are the channels YT picks on the most. I guess cause those channels don't make money for them. Anyway, I could go on but I know this is way more than you wanted to hear. ;)