Dude .get over yourself. This was a very unbiased neutral opinion given on the match. Don't keep playing the victim always. Learn to appreciate other points of opinion.
Firstly, Rahul Dravid's father didn't work in a Jam Factory. He was an engineer and played first class cricket for Karnataka state. His name was Jammie because he shot an advertisement for "Kissan Jam" which had a jingle "Jam Jam Jammie". P.S. it was a clean catch, no wobble in the boundary cushions.
Shawn Pollock and other media personnel who had a birds eye view of the catch have reaffirmed that there was green strip between the shoes and boundary cushion.The people who were absent from the stadium are the ones to have questions so they should be aware of this
Bcz of one spread low quality vedio from one black SA guys. Sky rubbed the ground during running and bcz of frictional force the grass comes off. Some soil and grass plugged out that's why it made confusion. It's completely correct catch and it's grass. Sky feet is ok. No one expert in commentry box like ponting Pollok, Steyn is ok with catch. Not a ex cricketer claim against it neither wisden, fox cricketer claim it. Bcz it's fear. No one cares what some black afrikan fan or some pak fan claim
Initially I thought the feet of sky touched the cushion but it actually not. Don't trust on some 4s vedio which spread on social media from wrong angle to creat more misconception. Watch the whole vedio then zoom both angle which has been shown and do it scientifically analysis step by step with time. You can watch it many times. 1) There was a white border line of blue cloth. You set a point of that white border line from start point and end point as a straight line. And then try to watch zoom vedio from both angle (not one angle like some SA fan spread). From left angle it is clear that only that white border line of that blue cloth could touch his shoe bcz it was border line and in front. Also it was vertical cloth with white border line and stand tall. Now watch it carefully slowly from left side angle at high quality zoom: 1) when his feet was not close to that line (where he could touch) there was no external substance initially. 2) when his feet enter to that point his shoe rubbed the ground and some external substance comes off which is grass. Now prove?????? Follow the distance from any virtual point (nearer at the ground) to that white border line and when sky left that place you follow that distance. It's will be clearly visible that some grass is infront of that white line but that white line is bit behind of that substance and that intact from left to right as a whole. Basically, bcz of that grass plugged off quickly it creat confusion. But that white borderline is some distance behind from that grass and that feet could only touch that white line. No cloth was on the ground initially. It's stand vertically. It's blue cloth with white border line. Then some grass comes off and liked like it vibrated. Again, I am saying, Initially that cloth was vertically stood tall and it had white border line. When he left the place that some external substance (clearly glass) is in front of that white line but that white line looked straight like initial state from left to r8 just the grass cover the small part of it from that angle. Also there is no vibration on blue cloth. 2) Now from another angle for RHS::: You can follow it from star sports highlights that it's clearly visible that some grass comes off and flies over that white border of the blue cloth and feel on the ground but their is some milimeter distance btwn that white line and those grass. It will clear you the whole thing altogether. You can zoom it from start sports. Don't believe others vedio why will watch you worse possible position. It's bit of understanding in depth, concentration and bit of physics. Thank you
It was absolutely a fair catch. If you slow down the real-time top view footage, which was taken from somewhere near media box, you can see the clear gap between boundary cushion and his shoes. That was a beautiful piece of work by SKY.
The most haters of Indian cricket are mainly from Aust, England n our loving neighbour. These people cannot stomach the idea of India winning any ICC tournament because for them, any other team can win but not India. It’s mostly from jealousy due to the money in Indian cricket and bcos of hatred they have for India n Indians.
I don’t think the Aussies are haters, neither are the Pakistanis. Few exceptions but the large part Aussies respect India and the Pakistan hate their own administration. The English on the other hand are something else. For sure you can see how much they hate on India by taking subtle digs
@@banditonehundred I think you have not read the narratives from some of the Aussies media, ex players, fans on how they attack the Indian team on many occasions. On Pakistanis, the less said the better as they are among the most bitter people if India does well.
Also those people are nowadays lost brain bcz of social media. They are trusting on some vedio of low resolution which made illution effect. Some people are thinking that his feet touched the cushion from LHS angle who has no idea that it was parallax effect effect btwn the shoe of sky, bottom of cushion and the grass. Clearly some grass comes off which is clear from RHS angle at high quality vedio and that made confusion from LHS angle. The bottom of cushion was vertically aligned and some grass plugged out bcz of friction btwn shoe and the soil and from that low resolution vedio it was looked like something at the bottom of cushion vibrated. It's confusion from that low resolution vedio this merely parallax effect. The bottom (white border of blue cloth) was still centimetres behind when grass comes off.
@@JayantaBera-yt8ls Nowadays anyone can use AI to alter the image on a photo or change wat we see on a video so we cannot accept anything we see on social media as the truth. ICC judge had made his decision and it stands as the final decision.
In the one day world cup he was playing his natural game . Like anchoring when he needs to and attack if he has the chance . In the T20 world cup he was not playing his natural game until the final . He was playing as an opening batsmen like jaiswal . But he is not an attacking batsmen like jaiswal so it was not working but he played his natural game in the final and kept the innings going and score some big runs in between .
I don't think bringing the ball inside the ground should be outlawed. Irrespective of who does it, it just increases the thrill by several notches. No matter which side they supported, almost everyone who saw Surya's catch was up on their feet: either out of disbelief and excitement, or out of shock.
Wow, in the middle of this intense game i completely missed Jay Shah running the length of the field straight past the umpires to push the boundary cushions back just before the last over was to be bowled, but of course my friends over at PAK,SA,AUS,ENG,BAN luckily we're so glued to the TV that they clearly saw that IT INDEED HAPPENED, and have since not stopped saying it on social media...#EAGLEEYES for a reason.
Bro we all know how much fit jay shah is ……so he did changed the boundary just like FLASH does the thing in web series . I wish I had the fitness like jay shah but one thing that is common in me , you and jay shah is cheating , we Indians are born cheaters , we have bought ICC and now it has become ICC= BCCI . We can’t win a match without the help of ICC . Bangladesh and Pakistan is superpower in cricket and economy and they have NO. 1 army .
Rules needs to be changed? Really?😂. When Maxwell, Warner and some other players from SENA countries took similar acrobatic catches near boundary ropes did you talk about rule change?😜 i am ok with difference of opinion but this seems to be a classic case of “ green eyed monster”
Has the 'bye runs' rule been changed since England won the world cup in 2019?? I don't know. Correct me if am wrong, but i don't think it has been changed. Now when an Indian player has taken a brilliant catch on the boundary line to win his team a world cup trophy, now suddenly the rules are needed to be changed..isn't it? Hmm.... interesting
The catch taken by SKY was clean. That's that. Rest is history. Team India won fair and square. Let's also agree that South Africa didn't choke without a fight. They need to work on mental toughness. Nerves got to them like they always have. Last 5 overs was where they were undone by brilliance of Jasprit Bumrah, Arshdeep Singh and Hardik Pandya and jangling nerves. Period.
How old these guys r... mey b heading towards Dementia 😢....my advice is please get away from rifind carbohydrates..prioritize protein n don't fear healthy fats.
By the way in baseball the rules state 1. A fielder may reach over a fence, a railing, a rope, or a line of demarcation to make a catch. 2. When the ball bounces off the wall, the team on defense tries to catch it. If they catch it before it hits the ground that is an out! So that comparison is a bit off
India won by 5 runs against Pakistan in 2007, by 7 runs against South Africa, what an innings in final by Virat Kohli, Hardik Pandya and Bumrah turned the match, Sky caught the catch of the tournament. Roko legendary retired after winning T20WC glory for India, Indian team will never be same after Roko, Jadeja retired and will be missing in dugout.
The mystery of this catch makes this all the more exciting. It's not clear if it's a right or wrong catch. His shoe tip could have kissed it by a hair or it could just be the force from the air rush generated when he thumbed his foot on the ground and the vibration as just the fabric on the Toblerone moved very so lightly.
Sir why were you watched that catch from only one angle???? Social media vedio???? From LHS angle it looked like someting moves but it not the white banner of cushion its the grass which moved. Why??? Its clear from another angle. From opposite angle (third umpire watched) RHS he is far away to touch that rope at same position. And green grass clearly comes off which was visible. From LHS angle its the soil and grass that moves not tha banner. Sky had high speed..when he replaced that place that white banner was not perturbed it was intact. Some grass was in front of that banner.
If player going outside the boundary is considered out then there must be rule if both feet touch the ground inside the boundary while ball in hand then that's a fair catch, just like NFL. In case of sky catch both feet touch the ground inside the boundary. Btw hawk eye provides 3 different camera angles for all the replays. What we see on jumbotron is not what 3rd umpire gets in his feed. That is just one of the camera angles.
Some people in SA also claiming the feet of sky touched the cushion from LHS angle. That angle (LHS) is prone to optical illusion.The other angles (RHS) show he was far from the rope and It was green grass which plugged out. The banner on the rope doesn't move at all, the soil (with some grass) does. From LHS, It was merely parallax effect effect btwn the shoe of sky, bottom of cushion and the grass. Clearly some grass comes off which is clear from RHS angle at high quality vedio and that made confusion from LHS angle. The bottom of cushion was vertically aligned and some grass plugged out bcz of friction btwn shoe and the soil and from that it was looked like something at the bottom of cushion vibrated. It's confusion bcz of optical illusions (poor resolution in zoom). The bottom (white border of blue cloth) was still centimetres behind when grass comes off. other angles show he was far from the rope.
I was in Australia during the World Cup for holidays and none of the hotels were showing the matches . Had to do with watching footy or what ever it’s called Australian rugby. Completely agree the world cups shud be on the normal telly.
Initially I thought it touched. But actually not. There was a white border line of blue cloth. You set a point of that white border line from start point and end point as a straight line. And then try to watch zoom vedio from both angle (not one angle like some SA fan spread). From left angle it is clear that only that white border line of that blue cloth could touch his shoe bcz it was border line and in front. Also it was vertical cloth with white border line and stand tall. Now watch it carefully slowly from left side angle at high quality zoom: 1) when his feet was not close to that line (where he could touch) there was no external substance initially. 2) when his feet enter to that point his shoe rubbed the ground and some external substance comes off which is grass. Now prove?????? Follow the distance from any virtual point (nearer at the ground) to that white border line and when sky left that place you follow that distance. It's will be clearly visible that some grass is infront of that white line but that white line is bit behind of that substance and that intact from left to right as a whole. Basically, bcz of that grass plugged off quickly it creat confusion. But that white borderline is some distance behind from that grass and that feet could only touch that white line. No cloth was on the ground initially. It's stand vertically. It's blue cloth with white border line. Then some grass comes off and liked like it vibrated. Again, I am saying, Initially that cloth was vertically stood tall and it had white border line. When he left the place that some external substance (clearly glass) is in front of that white line but that white line looked straight like initial state from left to r8 just the grass cover the small part of it from that angle. Also there is no vibration on blue cloth. 2) Now from another angle for RHS::: You can follow it from star sports highlights that it's clearly visible that some grass comes off and flies over that white border of the blue cloth and feel on the ground but their is some milimeter distance btwn that white line and those grass. It will clear you the whole thing altogether. You can zoom it from start sports. Don't believe others vedio why will watch you worse possible position. It's bit of understanding in depth, concentration and bit of physics. Thank you
It's a parallax effect btwn the spike of sky, the grass and the bottom of the cushion (white line). If you watch full vedio and zoom from both angle it's some grass plugged out and comes off in front of white line of blue cloth (cushion). More clear from RHS angle. You can check it from icc uploaded vedio or hotstar. Some pak and SA fan spread a vedio of 3 sec from LHS angle with in appropriate zoom angle and poor quality vedio. Too make more confusion. That bottom of cushion was 1 or 2 cm behind to touch the shoe. It's grass comes off with some soil. Parallax effect. That's why education is important.
if kohli just by scrapping too hard wins a pott in one world cup 2023 and wins the 2024 odi world cup with potm in the final damn i wanna scrapp by too if that is a low point in kohlis career damn i wanna hit a low point like that
shaun pollock explained it that it was out. It's all about ICC playing condition. No one SA greatest like Steyn Smith claim it even SA skipper. Fox cricket (post against india most of the time) and wisden cricket not claimed about it why???? Bcz it's fair. One bowler is on the mark then the cushion is the final boundary. In many games ropes are used to shifted bcz of change of pitch. First: It could be same (white line and rope) from the start of the match. Some said northje did it during fielding when Kohli hits 4 in first over . Then whole india batting in same boundary. Second: once bowler in the mark the cushion (rope which we follow) is the ultimate boundary. After bowling a delivery If a fielder shift it first then caught the ball then the marker will be original (ICC 9:3:3). But it's of during that delivery. Once the bowler on mark the cushion is the final one which ponting Pollock explained. If it is shifted then it should be corrected otherwise ball will be considered as dead ball (9:3:2). So the ball is dead??? No it's total 6,7 rule all together presents the outcome and according to icc playing condition umpire is correct. In many games even in psl the boundary marker (line) and rope are diff bcz it used to vary in diffrent situation in diff match especially if pitches is changed or excessive rain etc. It's a serious claim and except some pak, SA fan no one cares it specialy expert, ex cricketers even in SA. Either the rope was same from ball one or it should be dead. 9:3:3 only applied for a particular delivery not the entire match which people misunderstood. They should read all 9:3:2 to all rule about that and understand the outcome also ICC playing condition. And his feet touched the rope????? Please watch it in 240p by zoom. It's the grass. His shoe rubbed the ground during fast running..bcz of frictional force btwn shoe and the ground some grass was plugged out. That ground is like mat of grass. Since he rubbed the ground some grass (maybe with some soil) plugged out and it made confusion. Umpire watch in both angle. Common sir..
Initially I thought the feet of sky touched the cushion but it actually not. Don't trust on some 4s vedio which spread on social media from wrong angle to creat more misconception. Watch the whole vedio then zoom both angle which has been shown and do it scientifically analysis step by step with time. You can watch it many times. 1) There was a white border line of blue cloth. You set a point of that white border line from start point and end point as a straight line. And then try to watch zoom vedio from both angle (not one angle like some SA fan spread). From left angle it is clear that only that white border line of that blue cloth could touch his shoe bcz it was border line and in front. Also it was vertical cloth with white border line and stand tall. Now watch it carefully slowly from left side angle at high quality zoom: 1) when his feet was not close to that line (where he could touch) there was no external substance initially. 2) when his feet enter to that point his shoe rubbed the ground and some external substance comes off which is grass. Now prove?????? Follow the distance from any virtual point (nearer at the ground) to that white border line and when sky left that place you follow that distance. It's will be clearly visible that some grass is infront of that white line but that white line is bit behind of that substance and that intact from left to right as a whole. Basically, bcz of that grass plugged off quickly it creat confusion. But that white borderline is some distance behind from that grass and that feet could only touch that white line. No cloth was on the ground initially. It's stand vertically. It's blue cloth with white border line. Then some grass comes off and liked like it vibrated. Again, I am saying, Initially that cloth was vertically stood tall and it had white border line. When he left the place that some external substance (clearly glass) is in front of that white line but that white line looked straight like initial state from left to r8 just the grass cover the small part of it from that angle. Also there is no vibration on blue cloth. 2) Now from another angle for RHS::: You can follow it from star sports highlights that it's clearly visible that some grass comes off and flies over that white border of the blue cloth and feel on the ground but their is some milimeter distance btwn that white line and those grass. It will clear you the whole thing altogether. You can zoom it from start sports. Don't believe others vedio why will watch you worse possible position. It's bit of understanding in depth, concentration and bit of physics. Thank you
They just can't digest india won. He is saying he doesn't like the rule, where if the ball goes over thr boundary line. It shows they just want to create something
Why last 50 over world cup Rohit catch by Head not checked again and again. He accepted that it had touch ground. Had Rohit been not out the result would have been different.
Personally I think what should be outlawed is a player throwing in a catch from outside the boundary to another player thus 2 people completing the catch. If its done by the same player, I feel that should remain a fair catch.
These folks are burning like hell. We have a special burn ointment here called Burnol. We can send you some Burnol to cope. Let us know, instead of suffering alone and in private 🤪😂
Let's be honest. This guy wouldn't be talking about changing the rule if there was an Australian cricketer instead of SKY in the same scenario
Hell no
Agree
Dude .get over yourself. This was a very unbiased neutral opinion given on the match. Don't keep playing the victim always. Learn to appreciate other points of opinion.
@@burrahhhbrrit is what it is.
@burrahhhbrr yeah, jealousy is a point of view
this sports journalist looked biased
he doubted yesterday's sky catch.....
😂😂😂
Firstly, Rahul Dravid's father didn't work in a Jam Factory. He was an engineer and played first class cricket for Karnataka state. His name was Jammie because he shot an advertisement for "Kissan Jam" which had a jingle "Jam Jam Jammie".
P.S. it was a clean catch, no wobble in the boundary cushions.
Rahul Dravid's father was in senior management position aint it?
@@anitapadhi325He used to work for Kisan foods
Jammy was a name given by Sachin to Dravid though.
You are wrong, his father retired from Kissan foods, which is a Jam company. Please delete your comment.
Jam jam Jammie ad came later, chronology samajhie
The catch was as clear as the daylight
Shawn Pollock and other media personnel who had a birds eye view of the catch have reaffirmed that there was green strip between the shoes and boundary cushion.The people who were absent from the stadium are the ones to have questions so they should be aware of this
Bcz of one spread low quality vedio from one black SA guys. Sky rubbed the ground during running and bcz of frictional force the grass comes off. Some soil and grass plugged out that's why it made confusion. It's completely correct catch and it's grass. Sky feet is ok. No one expert in commentry box like ponting Pollok, Steyn is ok with catch. Not a ex cricketer claim against it neither wisden, fox cricketer claim it. Bcz it's fear. No one cares what some black afrikan fan or some pak fan claim
Initially I thought the feet of sky touched the cushion but it actually not. Don't trust on some 4s vedio which spread on social media from wrong angle to creat more misconception. Watch the whole vedio then zoom both angle which has been shown and do it scientifically analysis step by step with time. You can watch it many times.
1) There was a white border line of blue cloth. You set a point of that white border line from start point and end point as a straight line. And then try to watch zoom vedio from both angle (not one angle like some SA fan spread). From left angle it is clear that only that white border line of that blue cloth could touch his shoe bcz it was border line and in front. Also it was vertical cloth with white border line and stand tall. Now watch it carefully slowly from left side angle at high quality zoom: 1) when his feet was not close to that line (where he could touch) there was no external substance initially. 2) when his feet enter to that point his shoe rubbed the ground and some external substance comes off which is grass. Now prove?????? Follow the distance from any virtual point (nearer at the ground) to that white border line and when sky left that place you follow that distance. It's will be clearly visible that some grass is infront of that white line but that white line is bit behind of that substance and that intact from left to right as a whole. Basically, bcz of that grass plugged off quickly it creat confusion. But that white borderline is some distance behind from that grass and that feet could only touch that white line. No cloth was on the ground initially. It's stand vertically. It's blue cloth with white border line. Then some grass comes off and liked like it vibrated. Again, I am saying, Initially that cloth was vertically stood tall and it had white border line. When he left the place that some external substance (clearly glass) is in front of that white line but that white line looked straight like initial state from left to r8 just the grass cover the small part of it from that angle. Also there is no vibration on blue cloth.
2) Now from another angle for RHS::: You can follow it from star sports highlights that it's clearly visible that some grass comes off and flies over that white border of the blue cloth and feel on the ground but their is some milimeter distance btwn that white line and those grass. It will clear you the whole thing altogether. You can zoom it from start sports. Don't believe others vedio why will watch you worse possible position. It's bit of understanding in depth, concentration and bit of physics. Thank you
SKY catch is favor
Others are just jealous whenever india wins
They dont like India and its cricket but their cricketers earn money from IPL ironic
It was absolutely a fair catch.
If you slow down the real-time top view footage, which was taken from somewhere near media box, you can see the clear gap between boundary cushion and his shoes. That was a beautiful piece of work by SKY.
All you got to do, sow the seeds of doubt...no basis of evidence...but sow the deep of doubt...and watch...classic Anglo trait.
The most haters of Indian cricket are mainly from Aust, England n our loving neighbour.
These people cannot stomach the idea of India winning any ICC tournament because for them, any other team can win but not India.
It’s mostly from jealousy due to the money in Indian cricket and bcos of hatred they have for India n Indians.
I don’t think the Aussies are haters, neither are the Pakistanis. Few exceptions but the large part Aussies respect India and the Pakistan hate their own administration. The English on the other hand are something else. For sure you can see how much they hate on India by taking subtle digs
@@banditonehundred
I think you have not read the narratives from some of the Aussies media, ex players, fans on how they attack the Indian team on many occasions.
On Pakistanis, the less said the better as they are among the most bitter people if India does well.
Also those people are nowadays lost brain bcz of social media. They are trusting on some vedio of low resolution which made illution effect. Some people are thinking that his feet touched the cushion from LHS angle who has no idea that it was parallax effect effect btwn the shoe of sky, bottom of cushion and the grass. Clearly some grass comes off which is clear from RHS angle at high quality vedio and that made confusion from LHS angle. The bottom of cushion was vertically aligned and some grass plugged out bcz of friction btwn shoe and the soil and from that low resolution vedio it was looked like something at the bottom of cushion vibrated. It's confusion from that low resolution vedio this merely parallax effect. The bottom (white border of blue cloth) was still centimetres behind when grass comes off.
@@JayantaBera-yt8ls
Nowadays anyone can use AI to alter the image on a photo or change wat we see on a video so we cannot accept anything we see on social media as the truth.
ICC judge had made his decision and it stands as the final decision.
Not sure about the comment of kohli scraping the last few years. He looked invincible in the one day world cup
In the one day world cup he was playing his natural game . Like anchoring when he needs to and attack if he has the chance . In the T20 world cup he was not playing his natural game until the final . He was playing as an opening batsmen like jaiswal . But he is not an attacking batsmen like jaiswal so it was not working but he played his natural game in the final and kept the innings going and score some big runs in between .
I don't think bringing the ball inside the ground should be outlawed. Irrespective of who does it, it just increases the thrill by several notches.
No matter which side they supported, almost everyone who saw Surya's catch was up on their feet: either out of disbelief and excitement, or out of shock.
Wow, in the middle of this intense game i completely missed Jay Shah running the length of the field straight past the umpires to push the boundary cushions back just before the last over was to be bowled, but of course my friends over at PAK,SA,AUS,ENG,BAN luckily we're so glued to the TV that they clearly saw that IT INDEED HAPPENED, and have since not stopped saying it on social media...#EAGLEEYES for a reason.
Bro we all know how much fit jay shah is ……so he did changed the boundary just like FLASH does the thing in web series . I wish I had the fitness like jay shah but one thing that is common in me , you and jay shah is cheating , we Indians are born cheaters , we have bought ICC and now it has become ICC= BCCI . We can’t win a match without the help of ICC . Bangladesh and Pakistan is superpower in cricket and economy and they have NO. 1 army .
Rules needs to be changed? Really?😂. When Maxwell, Warner and some other players from SENA countries took similar acrobatic catches near boundary ropes did you talk about rule change?😜 i am ok with difference of opinion but this seems to be a classic case of “ green eyed monster”
Who care these clowns? Dont give them any unnecessary fame.
I was in the match , I used my force powers(starwars) to move the rope line abit so that I can see the aussies seethe and cope.
Such a jedi, you are man!! Kudos!!!
Ugghhhh I love this hatred I live for this hatred
Lmao
South Africa should not be demoralised by this. They should be proud and still keep going because their trophy is not far away.
If maxwell took rhe catch, its will be wow
Sky's catch was totally genuine. You cannot always give benefit of doubts to batsman all the time. It was thoroughly checked by Third Umpire.
Don't argue with them.
There is a great heartburn across the journos in all aus nz eng media.
They really wanted india to loss
Cry more womp womp 🗿😂😂😂🏆🇮🇳🦾 Your Father India Won T20 Worldcup With Unbeaten 😎
There is one more "womp" in there somewhere, right??
19 November
@@kushajkumar6313 29 June
@@goodpersonias9857 Australia still has more ICC trophies than you guys and defeated you guys thrice in final 2003&2023 wc and WTC final
@@kushajkumar6313nepali Gurkha go back to your night duty as a watchman🤣🤣
Jealousy without sounding so and making it appear like some constructive ideas for betterment of the game. Well done. Guys get life.
Has the 'bye runs' rule been changed since England won the world cup in 2019?? I don't know. Correct me if am wrong, but i don't think it has been changed. Now when an Indian player has taken a brilliant catch on the boundary line to win his team a world cup trophy, now suddenly the rules are needed to be changed..isn't it? Hmm.... interesting
As Jarod Kimber said, just don’t bother wat others say and best is just to ignore them , so just ignore wat this Aussie says about SKY’s catch.
The catch taken by SKY was clean. That's that. Rest is history. Team India won fair and square. Let's also agree that South Africa didn't choke without a fight. They need to work on mental toughness. Nerves got to them like they always have. Last 5 overs was where they were undone by brilliance of Jasprit Bumrah, Arshdeep Singh and Hardik Pandya and jangling nerves. Period.
There is a subtle desire to undermine the success; they feel good about it.
GREEN GRASS NOT OUT 🤏
The catch was a safe catch it has been confirmed.
How old these guys r... mey b heading towards Dementia 😢....my advice is please get away from rifind carbohydrates..prioritize protein n don't fear healthy fats.
By the way in baseball the rules state
1. A fielder may reach over a fence, a railing, a rope, or a line of demarcation to make a catch.
2. When the ball bounces off the wall, the team on defense tries to catch it. If they catch it before it hits the ground that is an out!
So that comparison is a bit off
There is a choke and there is a strangle and there is a difference between the two.
Do not try to make a controversy out of a clean & genuine catch. Just discuss the cricket
India won by 5 runs against Pakistan in 2007, by 7 runs against South Africa, what an innings in final by Virat Kohli, Hardik Pandya and Bumrah turned the match, Sky caught the catch of the tournament. Roko legendary retired after winning T20WC glory for India, Indian team will never be same after Roko, Jadeja retired and will be missing in dugout.
The mystery of this catch makes this all the more exciting. It's not clear if it's a right or wrong catch. His shoe tip could have kissed it by a hair or it could just be the force from the air rush generated when he thumbed his foot on the ground and the vibration as just the fabric on the Toblerone moved very so lightly.
Could’ve would’ve should’ve. The catch was 100% legit. Get over yourself.
Sir why were you watched that catch from only one angle???? Social media vedio???? From LHS angle it looked like someting moves but it not the white banner of cushion its the grass which moved. Why??? Its clear from another angle. From opposite angle (third umpire watched) RHS he is far away to touch that rope at same position. And green grass clearly comes off which was visible. From LHS angle its the soil and grass that moves not tha banner. Sky had high speed..when he replaced that place that white banner was not perturbed it was intact. Some grass was in front of that banner.
If player going outside the boundary is considered out then there must be rule if both feet touch the ground inside the boundary while ball in hand then that's a fair catch, just like NFL. In case of sky catch both feet touch the ground inside the boundary. Btw hawk eye provides 3 different camera angles for all the replays. What we see on jumbotron is not what 3rd umpire gets in his feed. That is just one of the camera angles.
India beat Aussies, England, South africa, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, and they truly are deserving winners of t20 world cup
Some people in SA also claiming the feet of sky touched the cushion from LHS angle. That angle (LHS) is prone to optical illusion.The other angles (RHS) show he was far from the rope and It was green grass which plugged out. The banner on the rope doesn't move at all, the soil (with some grass) does. From LHS, It was merely parallax effect effect btwn the shoe of sky, bottom of cushion and the grass. Clearly some grass comes off which is clear from RHS angle at high quality vedio and that made confusion from LHS angle. The bottom of cushion was vertically aligned and some grass plugged out bcz of friction btwn shoe and the soil and from that it was looked like something at the bottom of cushion vibrated. It's confusion bcz of optical illusions (poor resolution in zoom). The bottom (white border of blue cloth) was still centimetres behind when grass comes off. other angles show he was far from the rope.
No actually someguys editing the catch with vfx probably someone who doesn't like us. I saw that video too.
Fully agree.. that boundary rule is like- I enter your house and keep jumping in the air like a monkey and claim that I am still outside!
I was in Australia during the World Cup for holidays and none of the hotels were showing the matches . Had to do with watching footy or what ever it’s called Australian rugby. Completely agree the world cups shud be on the normal telly.
Maybe we should start looking at having 2 or 3 separate teams. One for the test and another team for the white ball contest.
Initially I thought it touched. But actually not. There was a white border line of blue cloth. You set a point of that white border line from start point and end point as a straight line. And then try to watch zoom vedio from both angle (not one angle like some SA fan spread). From left angle it is clear that only that white border line of that blue cloth could touch his shoe bcz it was border line and in front. Also it was vertical cloth with white border line and stand tall. Now watch it carefully slowly from left side angle at high quality zoom: 1) when his feet was not close to that line (where he could touch) there was no external substance initially. 2) when his feet enter to that point his shoe rubbed the ground and some external substance comes off which is grass. Now prove?????? Follow the distance from any virtual point (nearer at the ground) to that white border line and when sky left that place you follow that distance. It's will be clearly visible that some grass is infront of that white line but that white line is bit behind of that substance and that intact from left to right as a whole. Basically, bcz of that grass plugged off quickly it creat confusion. But that white borderline is some distance behind from that grass and that feet could only touch that white line. No cloth was on the ground initially. It's stand vertically. It's blue cloth with white border line. Then some grass comes off and liked like it vibrated. Again, I am saying, Initially that cloth was vertically stood tall and it had white border line. When he left the place that some external substance (clearly glass) is in front of that white line but that white line looked straight like initial state from left to r8 just the grass cover the small part of it from that angle. Also there is no vibration on blue cloth.
2) Now from another angle for RHS::: You can follow it from star sports highlights that it's clearly visible that some grass comes off and flies over that white border of the blue cloth and feel on the ground but their is some milimeter distance btwn that white line and those grass. It will clear you the whole thing altogether. You can zoom it from start sports. Don't believe others vedio why will watch you worse possible position. It's bit of understanding in depth, concentration and bit of physics. Thank you
It's a parallax effect btwn the spike of sky, the grass and the bottom of the cushion (white line). If you watch full vedio and zoom from both angle it's some grass plugged out and comes off in front of white line of blue cloth (cushion). More clear from RHS angle. You can check it from icc uploaded vedio or hotstar. Some pak and SA fan spread a vedio of 3 sec from LHS angle with in appropriate zoom angle and poor quality vedio. Too make more confusion. That bottom of cushion was 1 or 2 cm behind to touch the shoe. It's grass comes off with some soil. Parallax effect. That's why education is important.
if kohli just by scrapping too hard wins a pott in one world cup 2023
and wins the 2024 odi world cup with potm in the final
damn i wanna scrapp by too
if that is a low point in kohlis career
damn i wanna hit a low point like that
shaun pollock explained it that it was out. It's all about ICC playing condition. No one SA greatest like Steyn Smith claim it even SA skipper. Fox cricket (post against india most of the time) and wisden cricket not claimed about it why???? Bcz it's fair. One bowler is on the mark then the cushion is the final boundary. In many games ropes are used to shifted bcz of change of pitch. First: It could be same (white line and rope) from the start of the match. Some said northje did it during fielding when Kohli hits 4 in first over . Then whole india batting in same boundary. Second: once bowler in the mark the cushion (rope which we follow) is the ultimate boundary. After bowling a delivery If a fielder shift it first then caught the ball then the marker will be original (ICC 9:3:3). But it's of during that delivery. Once the bowler on mark the cushion is the final one which ponting Pollock explained. If it is shifted then it should be corrected otherwise ball will be considered as dead ball (9:3:2). So the ball is dead??? No it's total 6,7 rule all together presents the outcome and according to icc playing condition umpire is correct. In many games even in psl the boundary marker (line) and rope are diff bcz it used to vary in diffrent situation in diff match especially if pitches is changed or excessive rain etc. It's a serious claim and except some pak, SA fan no one cares it specialy expert, ex cricketers even in SA. Either the rope was same from ball one or it should be dead. 9:3:3 only applied for a particular delivery not the entire match which people misunderstood. They should read all 9:3:2 to all rule about that and understand the outcome also ICC playing condition. And his feet touched the rope????? Please watch it in 240p by zoom. It's the grass. His shoe rubbed the ground during fast running..bcz of frictional force btwn shoe and the ground some grass was plugged out. That ground is like mat of grass. Since he rubbed the ground some grass (maybe with some soil) plugged out and it made confusion. Umpire watch in both angle. Common sir..
Initially I thought the feet of sky touched the cushion but it actually not. Don't trust on some 4s vedio which spread on social media from wrong angle to creat more misconception. Watch the whole vedio then zoom both angle which has been shown and do it scientifically analysis step by step with time. You can watch it many times.
1) There was a white border line of blue cloth. You set a point of that white border line from start point and end point as a straight line. And then try to watch zoom vedio from both angle (not one angle like some SA fan spread). From left angle it is clear that only that white border line of that blue cloth could touch his shoe bcz it was border line and in front. Also it was vertical cloth with white border line and stand tall. Now watch it carefully slowly from left side angle at high quality zoom: 1) when his feet was not close to that line (where he could touch) there was no external substance initially. 2) when his feet enter to that point his shoe rubbed the ground and some external substance comes off which is grass. Now prove?????? Follow the distance from any virtual point (nearer at the ground) to that white border line and when sky left that place you follow that distance. It's will be clearly visible that some grass is infront of that white line but that white line is bit behind of that substance and that intact from left to right as a whole. Basically, bcz of that grass plugged off quickly it creat confusion. But that white borderline is some distance behind from that grass and that feet could only touch that white line. No cloth was on the ground initially. It's stand vertically. It's blue cloth with white border line. Then some grass comes off and liked like it vibrated. Again, I am saying, Initially that cloth was vertically stood tall and it had white border line. When he left the place that some external substance (clearly glass) is in front of that white line but that white line looked straight like initial state from left to r8 just the grass cover the small part of it from that angle. Also there is no vibration on blue cloth.
2) Now from another angle for RHS::: You can follow it from star sports highlights that it's clearly visible that some grass comes off and flies over that white border of the blue cloth and feel on the ground but their is some milimeter distance btwn that white line and those grass. It will clear you the whole thing altogether. You can zoom it from start sports. Don't believe others vedio why will watch you worse possible position. It's bit of understanding in depth, concentration and bit of physics. Thank you
They just can't digest india won. He is saying he doesn't like the rule, where if the ball goes over thr boundary line. It shows they just want to create something
Why last 50 over world cup Rohit catch by Head not checked again and again. He accepted that it had touch ground. Had Rohit been not out the result would have been different.
White man crying nonstop challenge
when Australia becomes Lostralia it is cos'tralia, you know cos this cos that
Don’t get worked up over the comments, I think it was a fair analysis with some opinion mixed. This isn’t Godi media
Useless Jealous Blabbering Journalists as expected.
Personally I think what should be outlawed is a player throwing in a catch from outside the boundary to another player thus 2 people completing the catch. If its done by the same player, I feel that should remain a fair catch.
This guys are basically jealous on India’s victory!
Biased commentary.
This is the stupidest coverage/commentary I’ve seen of the world cup final and kohli. Non sense by Robert
Guys, Guys. Don't worry. Let us come to their shore for the BGT. We'll see then. All the bitching and moaning
Useless cricket expert
He is not just a king he is a genius... What a line you said Gerrard
That was Gerrard who said it originally, not Robert Craddock!
True@@blitzkrieg9782
I love this guy for his commentary on Virat Kohli's innings in MCG against Pakistan
Cry hard 😂
These folks are burning like hell. We have a special burn ointment here called Burnol. We can send you some Burnol to cope. Let us know, instead of suffering alone and in private 🤪😂
And it has a yellow cover and Color too😂😊