Thank you for offering such a clear and accessible video about a hard-to-understand concept. Our mission at SettleShark is for American consumers to see the potential and value of using Consumer Arbitration to achieve equity, fairness, and access to Justice. Kudos to you and the American Arbitration Association (AAA)!
Question about arbitration. I go for arbitration May 2nd for a federal lawsuit and I was wondering how do I present that evidence or does the arbitrator send me a message sometime down the line before arbitration?
I'm an automobile arbitrator and the books and training purchased over the years taught me to focus on one field and boom! Here I am today. Thanks AAA.
Thank you for the informative video. I made the mistake of signing a contract that said that if the employer and I had any disagreements then we would have to go through arbitration. We have a disagreement but he gives many excuses for not wanting to go through arbitration. I imagine that he doesn't want to go because it will cost him money and he might actually lose because, I think it's very obvious that he needs to pay me for the work that I did. How can I force him to go through arbitration?
Wowww! No appeal! No control ! No checks or balances! I have a question: Why would the arbitrator bother to read the case or even think about it? Nobody can hold them accountable for any nonsense ruling!
An arbitrator can be held accountable by appealing to the state supreme court. It is difficult to overturn an arbiters ruling. You basically have to show that the arbiter was unethical, did not interpret the law correctly or made egregious mistakes. I have had an arbiters decision overturned. Let's be clear, most if not all arbitrations are decided without you knowing it. The lawyers and arbiters do everything out of your view. The rest is a shit show. How can you minimize being railroaded by these people? Most important, always get you own lawyer. NEVER use a union lawyer. At least your lawyer can keep the union lawyer from tanking your case on purpose (that happens a lot). Also, know your rights and make your counsel do their job. It is up to you to get the evidence, know the case and be prepared. Make sure everything that is involved with the case is in writing and get copies of everything. Make sure the hearing is videoed or you have a stenographer. Always ask questions and make sure you tell them that you will want to see the final summations. There is more but this is enough to help protect you.
I f you are talking about speaking at the hearing? The arbiter controls the room. If the arbiter or your advisory are out of line, then it is up to your lawyer or the union lawyer to object. I want to make something clear......an arbitration is a "casual" way of adjudicating a dispute. A lot of the things that go on in a courtroom are minimized or not done at an arbitration. The arbiter has supreme authority. To hold him, the lawyers ( both sides ) and the hearing itself to the highest standard possible you MUST have the hearing recorded ( which you are legally allowed ). The lawyers are still held to the standards of the bar association and that states laws, the recording will ensure ( with your personal attorney ) that they hold up to the highest ethics possible. Hope this helps
Arbitrator in my case was super corrupt . Subpoena was illegal also subpoena a police that had nothing to do with the case. The arbitrator knew my verification process test result was a verified negative. Also denied me from testifying.
To the World Championships in Wariewa Doping Yoshihisa Hayakawa, an arbitrator at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), has ruled that he will be allowed to participate in the Beijing Games. Pointed out that there was a "serious defect". On top of that, he pointed out "NO!" To participate in the world championships. Why was such a ruling made? For some time, Mr. Hayakawa said, "I think that CAS ruling was wrong. If I were an arbitrator, I would have made the opposite decision. " "As far as the provisions of provisional suspension are read, malicious substances (trimetazidine) are unconditionally suspended. There is no exception to exclude persons requiring protection (under 16 years old), and there is no comment that it will be treated specially. Therefore, letting Wariewa participate does not fit the original purpose. , WADA also points out that the regulations are misread. " Although the exceptions are not clearly stated, CAS allows participation with its own interpretation. This has led to various "tragedy". Mr. Hayakawa pointed out that "Warieva is suffering from the double pain of suspicion of doping and antipathy to special treatment." He concluded, "I don't think the world championships should be played."
Hello. Are you a consumer wanting to Arbitrate a dispute with a business? Or are you a business owner wanting to arbitrate a dispute with another business? In either case, do the Terms of Use (consumer arbitration) or contract (business arbitration) contain a clause or statement about using arbitration instead of a lawsuit in the court? Your answers to these questions will help to determine how arbitration is started.
First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol. On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable. Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“) The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition.
Thank you for offering such a clear and accessible video about a hard-to-understand concept. Our mission at SettleShark is for American consumers to see the potential and value of using Consumer Arbitration to achieve equity, fairness, and access to Justice. Kudos to you and the American Arbitration Association (AAA)!
Yes, she is, pragmatic, direct, clear.
Good information thank you
I really appreciate this❤
Can you please tell me what should be an opening statement for the arbitrator?
Arbitrations are a joke. Been there done that and had 1 decision overturned. Get your own lawyer. Otherwise you are toast.
You didn't know how to present your case obviously
How many arbitrators does the American Arbitration Association use whom support the concept of Right-To-Work laws?
Question about arbitration. I go for arbitration May 2nd for a federal lawsuit and I was wondering how do I present that evidence or does the arbitrator send me a message sometime down the line before arbitration?
This lady is awesome
I have to agree
My Union should be prepersre , provide clear and convincing evidence. They have an obligation
Thank you.
I'm an automobile arbitrator and the books and training purchased over the years taught me to focus on one field and boom! Here I am today. Thanks AAA.
what does an automobile arbitrator do?
@@DuttyBoukmansToe Are you available to answer questions that I have about an automobile purchase?
@@leimagesalon_bylenab9421 absolutely. I can't provide info here but Google search me and I will pop up. Thanks
How does one subpoena witnesses or documents in arbitration? specifically when appearing pro se.
Thank you for the informative video. I made the mistake of signing a contract that said that if the employer and I had any disagreements then we would have to go through arbitration. We have a disagreement but he gives many excuses for not wanting to go through arbitration. I imagine that he doesn't want to go because it will cost him money and he might actually lose because, I think it's very obvious that he needs to pay me for the work that I did. How can I force him to go through arbitration?
hi im going through same thing with a used car i purchaased. i signed the arbitration form in good faith without reading until it was to late
Wowww! No appeal! No control ! No checks or balances!
I have a question: Why would the arbitrator bother to read the case or even think about it? Nobody can hold them accountable for any nonsense ruling!
An arbitrator can be held accountable by appealing to the state supreme court. It is difficult to overturn an arbiters ruling. You basically have to show that the arbiter was unethical, did not interpret the law correctly or made egregious mistakes. I have had an arbiters decision overturned. Let's be clear, most if not all arbitrations are decided without you knowing it. The lawyers and arbiters do everything out of your view. The rest is a shit show. How can you minimize being railroaded by these people? Most important, always get you own lawyer. NEVER use a union lawyer. At least your lawyer can keep the union lawyer from tanking your case on purpose (that happens a lot). Also, know your rights and make your counsel do their job. It is up to you to get the evidence, know the case and be prepared. Make sure everything that is involved with the case is in writing and get copies of everything. Make sure the hearing is videoed or you have a stenographer. Always ask questions and make sure you tell them that you will want to see the final summations. There is more but this is enough to help protect you.
its the evidence, and common sense, otherwise the strawman/scare crow OZ (Arbitrator) still doesnt have a brain
@@markbuonagura7746HELP😃CAN YOU OBJECT to keep the other party from speaking👏
I f you are talking about speaking at the hearing? The arbiter controls the room. If the arbiter or your advisory are out of line, then it is up to your lawyer or the union lawyer to object. I want to make something clear......an arbitration is a "casual" way of adjudicating a dispute. A lot of the things that go on in a courtroom are minimized or not done at an arbitration. The arbiter has supreme authority. To hold him, the lawyers ( both sides ) and the hearing itself to the highest standard possible you MUST have the hearing recorded ( which you are legally allowed ). The lawyers are still held to the standards of the bar association and that states laws, the recording will ensure ( with your personal attorney ) that they hold up to the highest ethics possible. Hope this helps
@@markbuonagura7746HELP🤐dont federal law over power State law😇
Arbitrator in my case was super corrupt . Subpoena was illegal also subpoena a police that had nothing to do with the case. The arbitrator knew my verification process test result was a verified negative. Also denied me from testifying.
what a fake judge with zero accountability was corrupt? shocking
Mines is corrupt too so I’m trying to find a way to ruin them
After 2 -3 months you leave I need to know if still exist a chance to go to arbitration
To the World Championships in Wariewa Doping
Yoshihisa Hayakawa, an arbitrator at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), has ruled that he will be allowed to participate in the Beijing Games.
Pointed out that there was a "serious defect". On top of that, he pointed out "NO!" To participate in the world championships.
Why was such a ruling made? For some time, Mr. Hayakawa said, "I think that CAS ruling was wrong.
If I were an arbitrator, I would have made the opposite decision. "
"As far as the provisions of provisional suspension are read, malicious substances (trimetazidine) are unconditionally suspended.
There is no exception to exclude persons requiring protection (under 16 years old), and there is no comment that it will be treated specially.
Therefore, letting Wariewa participate does not fit the original purpose.
, WADA also points out that the regulations are misread. "
Although the exceptions are not clearly stated, CAS allows participation with its own interpretation.
This has led to various "tragedy".
Mr. Hayakawa pointed out that "Warieva is suffering from the double pain of suspicion of doping and antipathy to special treatment."
He concluded, "I don't think the world championships should be played."
+1
How to start an arbitration ?
Hello. Are you a consumer wanting to Arbitrate a dispute with a business?
Or are you a business owner wanting to arbitrate a dispute with another business?
In either case, do the Terms of Use (consumer arbitration) or contract (business arbitration) contain a clause or statement about using arbitration instead of a lawsuit in the court?
Your answers to these questions will help to determine how arbitration is started.
No fault?
om Asddhh
здравствуйте
xxx
здравствуйте 738297001
First, the Con Edison has failed to prove that Butler’s non-criminal consumption of a legal substance rose to the level of abuse or that Butler’s consumption of alcohol adversely affected his job performance or the public’s trust (whatever that is). Moreover, the only consequence of off-duty chemical substance abuse is that the employee will be sent for a JFE. Here, Butler was sent for a JFE on December 16, 2014 tested negative for drugs and alcohol.
On December 13, 2014, Butler was purported observed by Officer Brito moving from the driver’s seat to the passenger seat a couple of hundred yards from the DWI checkpoint. Officer Brito did not testify that Butler was driving erratically or displayed other indicia of someone that was driving while impaired. The Union concedes that Officer Brito’s assumption that Butler’s actions were to avoid being identified as either a driver who had been drinking or a driver who might not have had a valid license is reasonable. It is also reasonable for Officer Brito to assume that if he could see Butler then Butler could see him. That assumption is not reasonable.
Officer Brito also demonstrated his expertise and training in many facets of alcohol and drug testing but the only verified test result was the breathalyzer results. This is important because clearly Brito had an animus against Butler. Brito testified that Butler was quietly being difficult and when Brito was asked why he issued Butler a summons for refusing to test AFTER he submitted to a breathalyzer test Brito testified that Butler was walking out of the police station with a summons regardless. Butler was issued a summons that was so patently meritless that the Westchester District Attorney’s office did not even submit opposition to Butler’s motion to dismiss. (Union Exhibit “2“)
The Union submits that Brito’s testimony is troubling. A police officer charged with upholding the law and who described himself as an expert in the observation of behavior under the influence of drugs and alcohol and who is also charged with knowledge of the NYS Vehicle and Traffic Law issued a summons that (based on his expertise) he had to know was invalid Brito practically admitted that since Butler gave him a hard time and wasted his time that night (because he did not engage in criminal conduct), he was going to give Butler a hard time. That hard time translated into the issuance of an invalid summons that forced Butler to retain counsel and utterly wasted the time of the Court that dismissed the summons that the Westchester County determined unworthy of opposition.
здравствуйте
здравствуйте 738297001