Most Tested Bar Exam Rules: Contracts

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 1. 03. 2018
  • FREE Top 120 Most-Tested Rule List: studicata.com/courses/studica...
    Contracts Decision Tree: goo.gl/V8MCzQ
    📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
    Law school prep: studicata.com/law-school
    Bar exam prep: studicata.com/bar-exam
    Free courses: studicata.com/free-courses
    ❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
    Community: studicata.com/groups/community
    Testimonials: studicata.com/testimonials-an...
    Submit a review: shoutout.studicata.com
    📱 TECH
    iOS app: studicata.com/ios
    Android app: studicata.com/android
    📣 ABOUT
    Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
    Email: info@studicata.com
    Learn more: studicata.com
    🎬 VIDEO INFO
    Most Tested Bar Exam Rules (MEE): Contracts
    (1) Law Applicability: Common Law vs. UCC
    (2) Expectation Damages
    (3) Contract Formation Requirements (Mutual Assent + Consideration)
    Learn more: studicata.com

Komentáře • 32

  • @kristeneby2510
    @kristeneby2510 Před 3 lety +11

    I'm 6 days from the bar and I'm watching these videos as a replacement for therapy

  • @ChickenParmVodka
    @ChickenParmVodka Před 5 lety +18

    this man has rhythm, society has forgotten that rhythm IS time

  • @poppy5267
    @poppy5267 Před 4 lety +26

    I wish it was you in the barbri lectures :(

  • @Catzzzzz
    @Catzzzzz Před 4 lety +22

    At 6:30 I'm really glad you didn't edit this part out. I was eating breakfast and had this video on in the background, and I didn't start paying close attention until you admitted you made a mistake in not deciding first if you need to discuss UCC or common law. This really humanized the presentation of otherwise technical contracts material, and it will definitely stick in my mind as I sit for the exam. It was a great learning moment. Thank you for the honesty. It is a valuable teaching lesson.

  • @elijahporter4558
    @elijahporter4558 Před 5 lety +11

    He is thorough

  • @kerilofton1569
    @kerilofton1569 Před 3 lety +6

    Why don't law schools talk about Mike and Studicata? I'm here in 2020 getting ready for Feb exam and this is LYFE!!! shot out to all the covid examinees!!!

    • @DJKaiger
      @DJKaiger Před 3 lety +1

      Seconded. This is bar prep the way I need it to be.

  • @francisobalim1221
    @francisobalim1221 Před rokem

    Mike, I lack words to show my appreciation to your concise and simplified guide and methods but still, thank you for being a savior.

  • @asiadabner5643
    @asiadabner5643 Před rokem

    Awesome summary. Super digestibl!

  • @PapaArkansas870
    @PapaArkansas870 Před 4 lety +3

    Do you have a video where you talk about contract remedies? Having trouble locating it...

  • @johnwinters1518
    @johnwinters1518 Před rokem

    Every time I think about res ipsa, I think back to Torts 3 years ago and hear, "Burn versus BOWdull. Burn versus BOWdull." Try not saying it out loud lol. This guy is a lifesaver. Better than 90% of law professors

  • @NamasteCC
    @NamasteCC Před 5 lety +2

    Thank youuuu

  • @jessicaa6114
    @jessicaa6114 Před 4 lety +3

    Amazing, thank you.

    • @studicata
      @studicata  Před 4 lety

      No problem, happy to help! 👍

  • @alfonsocabrera485
    @alfonsocabrera485 Před 4 lety

    Hey do you do PPR/

  • @Acidroots87
    @Acidroots87 Před 5 lety +2

    Do you think that these info sessions could be useful for someone taking the Florida Bar and not just the UBE?

  • @asiadabner5643
    @asiadabner5643 Před rokem

    Appreciate this resource. The link for the 120 rules doesn’t work. I created an account and still don’t see the document.

  • @marksman9249
    @marksman9249 Před 3 lety

    Hi Michael, do you mention in your lectures that the acceptance must be communicated to the offeror or did I happen to miss that. You did mention many times that the offeror must communicate offer to the offeree.

    • @studicata
      @studicata  Před 3 lety +1

      Yes, the offeree must communicate his acceptance to the offeror.
      However, under the mailbox rule, an *ACCEPTANCE* that is sent by mail, email, or fax is valid at the moment of dispatch (*NOT* when the letter is received), unless: the offeree-sender uses the wrong address or has improper postage (e.g., forgets to put a stamp on the envelope); the offeror stipulates that the acceptance is valid upon receipt; an option contract is involved; the offeree-sender sends a termination letter *BEFORE* the acceptance letter (e.g., a counteroffer or rejection letter); *OR* the offeror detrimentally relies on a termination *BEFORE* he receives the acceptance letter. If an exception applies, then the acceptance becomes effective at the moment the offeror receives the acceptance.
      Thus, an acceptance _can_ become valid before the offeror receives the acceptance letter or otherwise has knowledge of the acceptance. This can create all kinds of interesting fact patterns.
      More info: czcams.com/video/GQ0VfUU3U9s/video.html

    • @marksman9249
      @marksman9249 Před 3 lety

      @@studicata Thanks Michael. What about when the offer is irrevocable? The Mailbox rule does not apply in that case too ryt?

  • @MsVoldemort1
    @MsVoldemort1 Před rokem

    I love you so much. My old familiar friend ❤️

  • @edwardcross1932
    @edwardcross1932 Před 5 lety +2

    The link for the 120 Free Rules only goes to the home page where everything has a fee. Please send to me. Thank you.

    • @studicata
      @studicata  Před 5 lety +2

      Sorry about that! You can use this link: www.studicata.com/frequency

  • @themistoklestheodosopoulos6253

    For some reason this doesn't sound right unless i play it at 1.25x speed.

  • @johng9095
    @johng9095 Před 5 lety +2

    Wouldnt $1 be enough for consideration. Peppercorn theory?

  • @richardeduardoscott3413

    Mike? Lol. I wrote the fucking book on contracts, civ pro, constitutional law, real property, gifts, criminal law and criminal procedure, employment discrimination, civil rights litigation, federal courts, sorry trying to remember alk the classes I took and my grades in law school.
    So Mike:

  • @morganistdiefrage3310
    @morganistdiefrage3310 Před 5 lety +2

    das ist sehr interessant

  • @legewantes7099
    @legewantes7099 Před 5 lety +3

    are you in a dancing club