In-Laws Are Out on Their Money
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 07. 2024
- The plaintiff used to be married to the defendant’s sister, and he sees him as a younger brother. He claims the defendant stole his tax refund, so he’s suing. The defendant denies taking the money. He thinks his sister took the money and is lying to him. He’s countersuing for emotional distress and slander.
#JudgMathis #Court #Mathis #RealityTV
Subscribe to our channel below:
/ judgemathis - Zábava
What's so hard to understand. She transferred the money to a capital 1 account. Her brother said it was fraud and they reversed the money back to chase. After that he cancelled the account and took the money. What's so hard to understand
It’s definitely not hard to understand. Too much extra talking from too many people messed it up for the Judge. Yall know he has adhd lol
@@tjneverdefeated4394 I don't know this was a pretty clear cut case. He's slipping
They were doing too much. You can tell drama has been going on for a while in this family.
I was confused why JM didn't understand what the plaintiff was saying. Lol
i think it was not proven. and the burden of proof is placed solely on the plaintiff. instead of accusing him they should have gotten together and got to the bottom of where the funds went. if it was reversed back to the chase acct. then start there.
Moral of the story… GET YOUR OWN BANK ACCOUNT, instead of having to go through all this mess
So simple
This
Facts, I don't like sharing shit especially money
The ex wife took it 😂😂😂
It could all be so simple
When the defendant said she stole his money last year, I knew this was a vindictive of act to retaliate.
I feel like when judge Mathis can't figure out the case he mix folks up til they purger themselves
I knew he was going dismiss the case once he started getting loud with them 11:26
🤣🤣🤣 I never thought about that
Me too he does
Yes he does this every time.
Right…. Recess, go in his chambers and talk to the producers, take a shot, come back loud and annoyed, everyone is confused,(hell I had to rewind TWICE), case dismissed, Now they file his ruling with their local courts.
He stole their money.
Yep...I believe it.
He definitely did. He has that thief look in his eyes😂
Definitely did
When JM said y’all trying to make me look like a fool case over😂
OVER WITTT
When Judge Mathis took a recess I knew he couldn’t figure it out. That’s why I like judge Judy you gotta come court with clean hands. They had account in the defendant’s name to avoid paying something, she would’ve dismissed case off that alone. 😂
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
He clearly stole the money. However, if they would shut up and stop talking over each other and get their story right, then they would have won 🙄
Exactly.
The moment I heard "taxes" I knew it would be some serious drama!
😂😂😂
JM need to calm tf down he know that man stole that money 🤦🏾♀️
Too much for this judge to handle he was overhelm fast😂😂😂😂
😂 yes! They definitely was stressing and pissing him off
Did u see how he said we need to take a recess..I ain’t never heard nor saw him do that 🫢🤣
Aries 😂
JM ALWAYS TALKING ABOUT HOW HE'S SO STREET SMART. YET, HE DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THE DEFENDANT JUST DID.
“You stole my tax money last year.” 😂 I swear yo! 😂🤣😂
Whew! Keep your family out of your business.
I think judge Mathis had a bad day on this case. I thought it was pretty cut and dry. When the deposit was reversed it went back to the original place it had been deposited to.. And then the brother-in-law closed the account.
Judge just didn't understand how the bank transfers work. They stole that money.
That lady stole the money , she playing the plantiff 😂😂
She stole her own money?
@TSR228 they were supposed to split it. I believe she took it all and split it with her brother....she gave that "oops Judge figured it out" look at one point.
@@shoogasweet5847 yea she played both of them .. she used the brother to take the fall 😂😂
@mikeaddison5697 I 100% agree!!! Plus she kept stumbling. On a case like she/they should've been air-tight/vacuum sealed🎯
@@shoogasweet5847 listen closely 4:30 4:30 4:30 they clearly say that his half went to his own account .
How come JM didn't call the bank
Good idea
good question🤔
That's up to the plaintiff and / or defendant to prove, the judge doesn't have to produce receipts for either side..
@user-ye5ku2ws6s I definitely understand that, but JM could have done that during recess.
😂😂😂cause he's not judge judy.
So, is Judge’s confusion over basic bank transaction systems due to him having the privilege of never having to watch over his own finances? lol
He always say Linda handles all the money.
He can’t assume how a basic bank system works. They have to prove it with evidence.
I don't understand why the money had to go to two separate accounts. Why couldn't her children's father just withdrawal the money when it came and gave her her portion......
She took the money and told her man her brother took it.
Bingo !
Yep she trifling
Well giiiiiyud dayum! The after party was the show And Doyle put a lil more bass in his voice with the "STAY SEATED" JM was legitimately pissed on this 1😂😂😂
JM's confusion comes from a lack of understanding on how some things work!!! The plaintiffs misspoke by saying the reversal would show Chase however a reversal means it went BACK to where it came from!! A statment likely doesn't have enough room on the line to show all the details!! The defendant ALSO said he disputed the transfer he also said he closed the account and the lady defendant no longer had access!! Whether her name was on it or not at some point she had access with a card or online and he stopped that! If JM would stop getting hung up on one word and not flip out, they could explain themselves. Plaintiffs also should've gotten a statement from the IRS showing where the money ended up before someone was able to spend it.
Spot on!
Defendant took the money. Straight up.
Exactly and didn't the defendant say he reported it for fraud..so it got reversed back..I think he took the money as well
@@dance4life1208 and kept referring to it as “my money”. How did JM moss that?
Yeah, I think Judge was stumped with this one because out of all the things they talked about, I don't understand why he flipped out because Chase wasn't on the statement.
Lesson....the next time she calls when he whoops her SAA....tell her call 911....PERIODT....and
Cut all times from them.
He told on himself when the brother said you took my tax money last year and my wife work for the bank.
No that don’t mean nothing he was saying if she was slick enough to take my tax money last year then you probably slick enough to try and scam me again.
No when he told her that she needed 500 dollars for her rent let you know she got some stuff going on
The plaintiffs did not prepare well at all for this case. The problem was that both of them were talking at the same time and that was even more confusing. I think the defendant probably did take the money, but they couldn't prove it because they kept over talking one another and instead of listening to the questions they were so quick to respond with what they wanted to say. Judge Mathis got tired and agitated and we all know once that happens, case dismissed!😂😂😂😂😂😂
Dude looks surprised 24/7 lol
LMFAO
Eyebrows on fleek!!!😂
@@ickieyon1254 lol
@@ickieyon1254Hilarious...The McDonalds' sign 😝
He's got strabismus too, a lazy eye...👁🗨.... 👀 😅
You make 60k and own your own business yet in bankruptcy chapter 12 and can't open your own bank account?
The math ain't mathing..
Ryte
Yea it does if he filed bankruptcy he most likely owed banks money I work in credit risk assessment he would be denied as soon as I say his membership app… not to mention it’s be the same ones he just put in the bankruptcy.
My eyes buck like that , it’s a thyroid issue. People always think I’m interested in their convos because I look so surprised all the time
Oh man I have thyroid problems and I didn't know that can happen!
I'm so sorry. I just know people be talking your ears off.
Is there a cure to that?
He should have dismissed this case without bias and had them try again somewhere else
This case is frustrating 😂
They wore the judge out!🤣🤣🤣🤣
How can a man with no self control, no emotional control and no patience actually be a judge?? Once again JM the only one confused about what happened!
I believe the defendant was lying the whole time, he just didn't get caught in the lie‼️‼️‼️
Right, and they kept over talking them which flustered them even more lol..then she wanna argue with him whole the dude trying to explain lol
The more they talk the more they lie.
Unclean hands ….. and it’s “TAKEN”
Ooohhh…. 😳 I know things were still crazy weird when they returned home!
The plaintiffs probably helped confuse the case because they kept on and kept on talking at the same time and talking over each other. Too much mess.
Sheesh. This was made more complicated than it had to be.
When I saw his eyes I hurried up and looked behind me 😅
😂😂😂
😂🤣😭
After he lied about having the gun pulled on him, he lost credibility. Everything after that was not going to be believed.
Exactly ain’t nobody pull a gun out on you 😂
“It was took” 🙄 So much drama! And the male plaintiff and the female defendant are brother and sister?? This is sad.
The female plaintiff (witness) and male defendant are brother and sister, the male plaintiff and female defendant (witness) are cousins...I know too much lol
@@nursecpierre 😂🤣
Lil duval 😂😂 the plaintiff
Well sue your mother 😂😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sue your mother! 😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣
😵💫😵🤔 yall making my head and eyes hurt
Thank you… mine was hurting to girl.
Right
Ryte
I would have give them the money back. However they should of had the check traced and seen who cashed it
Soon as the judge left the room, all the tea got spilled. Everybody dry snitching!! 😂😂😂
I feel like the Ex wife took the money and she was saying anything to fool JM she wasn’t working so to me that gave her the reason to need the money more scandalous
Confusing, who's lying?
The defendant 😹😹😹😹
Ryte smh they even got JM upset confused 😂
🍃"Return of the Mack!"
😂
❤
Don't kick me off the Internet y'all 😂❤
Look I thought the same thing 😂😂😂 shout out to Mark Morrison 😅
🤣🤣🤣🤣
JM is not patient or smart enough to understand what the defendants did
Why is he buckin his eyes like that😂😂😂 he look like a cartoon....
After all that help he gave her she still came with the defendant to help be his witness.I wouldn’t even help her again.Thats why I stay out family and lovers quarrel.They always end up back together and team up against the person who was helping.
The plaintiff was doing a great job UNTIL his witness (now I see why she is the x-wife) kept talking loud and over him, and answering JM's questions wrong. She would say "yes" and he would say "no" BUT she's ao loud, JM only heard her. He should have made her sat back down
God bless the Child who’s GOT HIS OWN!!!
The defendants stole the money.
Let's see whose account they use next year..
Unclean hands and mass confusion..
Family in turmoil. Hate to see this. I'm so glad that I go alone. No family! Just me and my money with 2 cats. All this in this case is all over nonsense. But very compelling case. I didn't know what direction this would go.
I have a brother and several sisters and I'm done with them. Way too much drama, I'm the only one that stays from them. A better happier life 😊
Sorry that's your experience. Thankfully, everyone doesn't have that experience.
Adrian, Adrian, Adrian! So you have cats and money? Interesting. Is your cat in your will?
This definitely explains your disdain of women and your hypercritical comments all over JM innanet.
What they don’t realize is once a IRS deposit was reversed to your bank after that you had to go through the IRS then it goes into a investigation and you won’t get your money maybe to a year after that it’s not coming back to your bank
Yep, the defendants stole the money. Get your own money!!!
Cmon defendant marcus Houston give dat money back niqqahh
What's really sad is that neither her or her husband could get a bank account in their name.... That reads SCAM to me, and cuzo was smart enough to close the account before they charged him...
The husband had an account the wife didn’t. She got the cousin to get her account. I think the wife stole the money and not telling the husband
What’s up with the plaintiff and the defendants wife eyes
I think 🤔 they are the ones related right?
.... hilarious and it runs in the family, they're cousins...
Judge Mathis was so frustrated because he used to working with drama cases and he don’t know anything about this !
Yup 👍🏾💯 he was "SHook" because he's a know it all and didn't know how to respond so that alone made him frustrated so F it both cases is dismissed I'm not going out like that I run things you better ask somebody I'm the H.N.I.C
Im Uncle JM aka Jack a.. the Man 🐎🤨😵💫🥴🥸🤡👨🏾⚖️💅🏾
They needed to decide who was going to talk they talked over each other and failed the whole case.
JM doesn’t know how bank reversal work? Dude received the reversal money, reported fraud on the account, then closed it out. I believe the wife was in on the fraud too. Smh, to do that to family members is lower than low.
The plaintiff is giving a Great Value Nelly. Broski lookin mad surprised lol
If they had evidence that the money was transferred into one account then reversed back into the account idk why he wouldn’t believe them. He should’ve asked the defendant what or where the money was originally from and if it was his to begin with or asked why it was reversed back into his account. I feel like this case was pretty straightforward, but they kept over talking each other so it made it harder to understand.
They have gotten on my very last nerves! 🙄😂
Sometimes judge Mathis do too much. That dude stole that money period.
The plaintiff contradicted themselves AND lied about the defendant pulling a gun on him. Plus the defendant said that the plaintiff's witness was fired for stealing on the job lmao so her credibility is zero. It's one thing about a thief they know how to lie and that plaintiff female was lying her as$ off. The plaintiff's witness and baby moma stole his half of the tax return.🤣
I worked for a bank. With ach, when they are reversed it doesn't go back to the bank automatic, if he closed it the next day, before it the funds came back to the account the funds more than likely went back to the IRS, because they have no acct to go to. Now what they should've done was went to the irs, and filed fraud against him .
😆Lol. The plaintiff, who conveniently was his ex-wife at the time, and who always did his taxes, took that money. Now the 💩 hits the fan she's gotta blame her brother. Go to @12:00-12:04 and check out her face when JM asks her if she took it.
JM said “making a fool out of me”🤣🤣🤣
Can we all just get along
When she said he took me off she clearly meant he took whatever she had to access the account SMH I'm not sure how he doesn't understand
I was hoping he would take the pen and scribble 'chase' on the paper lol
Why did her brother have to open an account for her, especially receiving the amount she would receive?
They were all confused and weird.
It's the thumbnail for me 😂😂🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Cases like this need to go to Judge Milan.
Poor baby he don't even know his ex-wife took that money
Somebody help me. Is the plaintiffs wife and the defendant- are they brother and sister? Suing each other? This is complicated.
Yep..
the ones ORIGINALLY related by blood are the plaintiff and the defendant's wife (they are cousins to each other)
@@phaldaz so the two crazy eyed people are cousins
We gone call him walkn eye balls😂😂😂
Eyeballs that’s what I call my 13 year old she has big pretty eyes
So why the judge didn’t ask where the documents showing he has proof she took the money out
Because he don’t need to prove he is innocent when he didn’t file the case.
The only time he would want to prove his innocence is if the evidence against him is strong yet he can prove he is innocent with his own receipts. Hope this makes sense. It’s similar with murder case. As a defendant you don’t need to prove you’re innocent. It’s the plaintiff that needs to prove you are guilty.
Did they not prove the money was taken back out of the account? He looking the word chase but I’ve been banking with USAA since I was 15 and never when something was reversed would it say flat out this or that bank. So why wasn’t he made to provide proof that she took the money and the account was closed. They misspoke and then on he was just listening to respond. He took the defendant word for everything he said without proving what he said was true. I’m not understanding how the defendant didn’t have to counter their proof because like they said that money didn’t reverse to no where. It didn’t reverse on its own without somebody doing it and their statement shows it was sent back to the account the defendant admitted she no longer had access to because it was allegedly closed but not without changing the address where any information being sent about the account to where he would only be able to see it.
@@MommyKi there was confusion in the plaintiff statement. Not that the Judge believed the defendant he wasn’t sure based of what the plaintiffs said and the evidence at hand. That’s why he didn’t give them ruling they became untrustworthy.
But I was answering your question as to why he didn’t ask for proof from the defendant. But lesson learned. Have your own account in your own name. The whole of them come across dodgy. If you have an account to transfer money why would you put in your brother’s account?
The whole tax returns when the child don’t live with you. Check bouncing back. Nothing of this makes sense.
They definitely stole that money. Every time the judge asked him what happened to the money he start talking about how she took his money first. lol so they even now.
Sounds like she was trying to say she had the log in information not that she was on the actual account. & when he got mad he changed the password & the address for the statement.
Serves the plaintiffs right tho cus they can’t even get bank accounts in their own name cus of all the money they owe. Prolly ducking child support
We all know he stole their money. That's why he closed the account so fast
Moral of story get your own bank account !
This case is a damn mess 🤦🏿♀️
She should have been quiet and let him speak! She kept not answer the direct question saying yes when the answer was no. And he clearly was able to articulate the details better and explain the transactions but she kept yapping 😭
The planiff ex-wife lie 3 times trying to fast talk JM cause them to lose the case😮
He dropped the ball on this one
I think the defendants and in the plaintiff witness was all in on it
If yall don't have your ducks in a row lie on judge Mathis you already lost your case
I’m so confused 😂
Income tax money is the devil
1. Why the defendant saying they told him his money was gone when he went to the bank when he says the money was his sisters? It was just in his name but the money was his?
2. Why he calling to reverse money or do anything on the account if it isn’t his money unless they ask him?
3. Who can you trust? None of these 😂😂
Judge mathis should have asked why the money reversed in the first place . the transaction was reversed by the brother when he reported the transfer as fraud thats why it went back. he got the money back and closed the account.
A lot of fraudulent activities. Even down to dividing up the tax return. The kids didn’t live with him full time but he claimed them anyway because she was jobless.
Which is why he can’t even report the defendant to the IRS. I mean he could but he’ll probably get in trouble too.
JM didnt understand... This is a case for Judge Judy!!!!!
Bro in the green looking at the camera smirking 😂😂😂