Brahuis - the last Dravidians of Pakistan and Afghanistan
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 07. 2024
- Who are the #Brahui people?
They are considered the only (and the last) Dravidians of Pakistan and Afghanistan.
0:00 Intro
0:25 Main Dravidian peoples
1:12 Brahui people - Location
1:52 Where do the Brahuis come from?
2:49 First theory - Dravidian migration to India
3:50 Second theory - Dravidian migration from India
4:30 Etymology
4:55 Linguistic aspects of Brahui language
6:08 Threats to survival of Brahui language
6:54 Usage of Brahui in Education and Media
7:22 Brahui literature
7:50 Brahui script
8:07 Brahui - an endangered language
Their total estimated number is just under 3 million. Most of them, about 2.6 million, live in Pakistan in the province of #Balochistan.
In Afghanistan, although official numbers are difficult to find, it is estimated that there are around 200,000 nomads or semi-nomads of the Brahui ethnic group, located in the southern province of Kandahar.
Alongside these larger and more consistent groups, Brahui communities are found even further west. For example, in Iran, precisely in the eastern province of Sistan and Baluchestan, bordering Pakistan. Here they are estimated to be a few tens of thousands, about 20,000.
However, very surprisingly, a small Brahui community is also present in Turkmenistan, in the oasis of Merv, at the gates of the ancient silk road.
Beyond the numerical factor, the most important question is: who are the Brahuis, what is their history? Are they really the last descendants of the Dravidian people, and therefore the confirmation of the #Dravidian presence throughout the Subcontinent before the arrival of the Aryans? Or, otherwise, are the descendants of migratory groups who moved here from other parts of India, thus refuting, in whole or in part, the theory of the Aryan invasion?
Let's analyze these and other questions concerning the Dravidians of Pakistan and Afghanistan in this video!
a great research about Brahuis. I am a Brahui from Balochistan Pakistan. approximately 40 to 50percent of Balochistan's population is Brahui the area of the state kalat which lies from quetta the capital of Balochistan to to the border of province sindh is mainly Brahuis people.
Thank you for your appreciation! I am glad I could shed some light on this interesting topic.
I agree with you that Ancient pandya kings-Dravidian King... were related to Ancient indo iranian people and some pasto and baloch .
Coz southern tip of tamilnadu like madurai-Tamils have almost facial cuts are similar..big face, long facecut ,extra average forehead ,wide average thin lips,protuding chin and tall height with large fingers,feet, broad shoulders and complete body structure.. it's possibility..we have common ancestors..these people are warriors like people.
These are akhand bharat- ancient people.-Common Ancestors. Some people in south resemble like pasto people.And I claim and have solid strong proof.
Kyunki muje urdu-hindi aur tamil aati hai..uska koi masla nahi hai..par achcha laga menu
Sunkar ki hamari culture or ancestor ek hi the .❤❤❤
Ok then Pakistan should join India back , anyway they are bankrupt, so it's better u split from them.😅😂
yes sindh is 90% brahu from mother side
every 2nd sidhi have mother or grand mother brauhi
@@suniljoseph5888 we sindh fought alaudin khilji even though our king dodo soomro was muslim but he died fighting for freedomr , during arabic rule we faught arabs and gain independence too there rule was brief, we didnt let arguns turks to rule us the ondians other hamd let the turks afghna rule 400 years d
But we kept put freedom in all cost do if we join india than it will be only on condition our identity as sindh will be achieved and we will have own state with india as our big brother
Hello from tamil speaking Dravidian Muslim (moor) of sri lanka ✋️
hello there! 🙂
I am a Tamil from.tamil Nadu..
I took a DNA test and the vast majority of my DNA is Harappan, even though I'm Telugu. I'm happy to be related to the Brahui and to share a common origin from the Indus Valley!
We dravidians are descendants of Krishna ..when dwaraka submerged..18 clans came to south india..Karnataka Andhra kerala tamill..we are yadavas..it's written in pathinanooru..a Sangha kala kriti of Tamil...it sheds the light into pre history
vast majority of every Indian's DNA is Harappan (and yes I took a DNA test as well, I'm not Telugu though). They dispersed into India after all. By the way Telugu might have been the closest to the Harappan language if you look at the Dravidian language tree
A test ekkada chestharu anna
How do you say your DNA id harappan ,I mean almost any person from subcontinent would have Harappan DNA for sure unless you are pure and came from outside, Which is like case of Kalash tribes.
@@breezthomas6828No bro we telugu people I mean Andra (don't know about Tamil but)supported kouravas in kurukshetra war it is mentioned in books .
There is another major independent Dravidian language is Tulu , and it is spoken in Karnataka and Kerala
Tulu is not a major Dravidian language, it has comparatively lesser number of speakers and it is not a language with much literary tradition. Gondi on the other hand is a very significant Dravidian language
yes, you are right, although the number of its speakers is smaller than those of the other main Dravidian languages. You might want to check my other video about Dravidians, where I also talk about Tulu language 😊 czcams.com/video/HW7k5_1MZCY/video.html
Excellent research done. Quite interesting video. Learnt something new. Thank you Simone. 👍
Thank you so much for your kind comment!
It is my pleasure to help spread awareness about this remote people of Asia, perhaps one of the last vestiges of the Dravidian people on the edge of the Subcontinent.
Love you brother for giving us such a information to people❤
Fantastic video. Carry on the good work
Thank you Geeky Simo, I love your channel, keep it up ❤👍
I watched a video of a Turkish professor who said the Sumerian language and Dravidian languages have similarities. I've also learned that the Dravidian languages are agglutinative languages like Turkic languages and the word order in both groups are SOV, i.e. subject+object+verb. I wonder if there are further similarities.
They are descendants from the Zagros mountain Iranian farmers. Who mixed with the aboriginal Indian population and gave birth to the Dravidians and the Indus Valley Civilization.
Your mention of the Indus Valley Civilization is very interesting point, that also lead to further discussions. Thanks for having brought it up!
See, despite many academic works conducted on this matter, so far archaeological discoveries and limited linguistic evidence available do not allow us to identify with certainty the language (or languages!) of the Indus Valley Civilization. If we add to this the presumed geographical-temporal extension of the main linguage families of present-day India (Aryan and Dravidian in particular) and the influences that the languages part of those families had on each other over the millennia, the situation is even more complicated.
As mentioned in the video, the languages of the Dravidian group, despite being mainly concentrated in southern India, also have a scattered presence in other parts of the Subcontinent. Examples are those of the Brahui language in the north-west, and the Kurukh and Malto languages in the north-east.
Beyond the hypothesis that the Brahui language could have originated from the "counter-migration" analyzed in the video (minute 3:50), the presence of groups speaking Dravidian languages in areas far from central southern India could indicate that Dravidian speakers probably had a far greater prehistoric presence in northern Subcontinent (including the regions covered by the Indus Valley Civilization) than the limited one they have today.
Another theoretical linguistic relation I suggest to to deepen is the Elamo-Dravidian one. Clearly it deserves more attention, and it could help to resolve still many questions that remain obscure about both the linguistic past of the Subcontinent and that of the Indus Valley Civilization.
Sorry for the long comment, but this topic is extremely interesting and deserves to be discussed thoroughly! 😃
Wow ! You said as if you were there while it was happening.
There are not iranian framers there are west asian hunter gathers and one more thing agriculture is independent to indus valley
You are wrong
Nope they are descdents of Oraon tribe of India who moved to North West.
Brahuis can be said to be the people who established Indus valley considering their unique culture and language which further strengthens the theory that brahuis are proto Dravidian and Indus people
Brahuis are dravidians
Completely agree..
Thank you for you excellent work.
Thank you for your appreciation!
Thanks for making a video for brahuis❤😊
Thank you for whatcing!
It’ll be interesting to see how much the South Indian Dravidian and Brahui languages match.
Brahui is classified as a Dravidian language due to its grammatical structure identical to Dravidian languages. However it is estimated that only perhaps 20% of the lexicon is Dravidian origin while the rest are predominantly derived from Iranian languages especially the neighboring Balochi language. For example: 60% to 70% of the lexicon of the English language is derived from Romance languages but the language is classified as a Germanic language due to its grammatical structure identical to Germanic languages like German and Dutch.
Hi Rohini! There are several videos online trying to address this question, however, as far as I am concerned there are no official studies in that sense. So, we can only speculate about how Brahui and other Dravidian languages are intellegible. Furthermore, trying to compare the Brahui language to "all" the other Dravidian languages is a hopeless undertaking, considering the extension and the profound grammatical and lexical differences existing between the different languages part of the Dravidian family. We must therefore subdivide this linguistic family to look for some proximity. Therefore, considering the belonging of Brahui to the Northwestern group of Dravidian languages, the linguistic and lexical proximity occurs above all with languages such as Malto and Kurukh. Now, does this proximity mean intelligibility? Not at all. As already noted by other users, although Brahui and the other Dravidian languages share a lexical and grammatical commonality (at different degrees), millennia of isolation in a predominantly Iranian and Indo-Aryan linguistic region have determined its independent development and the loss, if there ever was, of any intelligibility with the others Dravidian languages.
All native indians have mix blood of aryan and Dravidian ok 😊 all native indians are aryadravidians ok 😊😊😊
I would recommend you use the word "Iranic" simply for the purpose of avoiding confusion or ambiguity, as most people think of the nationality of Iran when "Iranian" is mentioned rather than the broader pan-ethnic group.
They are the original Dravidians who are descended from Zagros farmers (Neolithic Iranians) and indigenous Indians mixing to form the ASI (Ancestral South Indian) population. Most likely due to geoclimatic reasons, the Indus Valley Civilisation died off and many people had migrated away from the region, mostly to peninsular India where they mixed with the native tribes. Few went west, and remained as Brahui.
Then came Aryan populations from the North-west (Eurasian Steppe), who were nomadic pastoralists and would go where the grass is green (literally). The steppe is very cold and frozen during winter, so they migrated southeast, and when they discovered the heaven that was the IVC, they decided to settle and mingled with the remaining ASIs in the IVC and formed the ANI (Ancestral North Indian) population. This new ANI society had new beginnings, publishing texts like the Vedas that made reference to all these holy places around Punjab and Indo-gangetic plain as they spread out. The dense forests of central, south and east India had made it difficult for these ANI communities to spread further with all their cattle, bullock carts, chariots, and skilled personnel. Chopping down the forests was too much hassle when they could just be happy with the slice of heaven they found, and be close to all their new 'holy' pilgrimage sites. Down the track, ANI populations had migrated through trade and conquest as part of empires such as the Mauryan empire, to help the kings establish a self-sufficient economy with the varna system and spirituality through vedic texts, whether the promoted religion was Buddhism or Hinduism or Jainism. So that is how South Indians also have ANI blood but is far more diluted, and is more common in the castes like brahmins, warriors, traders, but is even found in some remote tribes like the Chenchus of AP/ Telangana.
Punjab, where I'm from, has absorbed every ethnic gene pool, so is as "Indian" as you can get - unity in diversity. Right from the original native adivasi Indians, to Zagros/ Dravidian, Aryan/ Steppe Caucasian, Greek, Afghan/Iranian/Persian, Scythian, Turko-Mongol (Huns and Mughals) and lastly British. In Punjab, you will see enormous diversity in phenotypes.
Tussi bohat vadhia gall kitta si pa ji 👍.
I like how elaborate you were in this sharing of your knowledge, which I 100% agree with as being as historically accurate as possible.. sadly, most fellow Indians get into a bunch of mess when this topic comes up and it ends up being a messy fight between OIT-advocating Hindutva extremists and 'anti-Aryan/North-Indian' Dravidian radicals..
Bes kehna chahta hun ki bohti sukhy huyi aapki baat deekh ker, khasker kionki main bhi xud aadha Penjabi houn.. 😄
Amazing and quite interesting! iam a brahui from sindh near sindh balochistan border.
جی براہوئی
Learnt alot from You
Thank you so much for your comment! It brings me great joy when efforts in spreading knowledge are appreciated. A big thank you from the bottom of my heart!
They are the true Indus valley people.
Love from Tamil Nadu. We all have the same ancestry
No. They are different people
Indus valley civilization follow non vedic Hinduism 🕉️ as a there culture and faith 😊 they are hindus 🕉 and shiv bhakts 😌😊😊😊
All native indians have mix blood of aryan and Dravidian ok 😊 all native indians are aryadravidians ok 😊😊😊
@@tokitomuimuiIndia is Dravidian land. Aryan Brahmns not native
@@rtrt7428Dravidians are also a mix of aboriginal hunter gatherer and iranic farmer so they are also mixed , when steppe Aryan came it added one more layer of mix
So mix + mix = remix 😂
Très intéressant 😊
Merci! J’ai appris beaucoup.
Un grand merci pour le commentaire!
Useful information
Thank you
I am a Brahui in Sindh
جی براہوئی ننا بولی ننا قوم
Then ur are tamil with sindi breed mix 🤮
following are the regions where mainly Brahuis live.
kalat,Noshki, Quetta,Surab,Mogaochar,khuzdar,wadah ,chaghi and you will not find Brahuis in the every corner of Balochistan but also in Sindh a province of Pakistan like in Shahdadkot,larkana,jacobabad, shikarpur, Hyderabad,sakkar,and karachi
I am brahui from Balochistan kalat and brahui is our language we are Baloch elum nan Baloch un tareekh E hur pehla
@@baloch3586 Han elum nan Baloch un they re dividing Balochs in to two nation brahui is just a language we Are baloch
and even half of the MPs(memeber of provincial assembly) in Balochistan and MNs( member of National assembly) from Balochistan are Brahui.. mentioning some of them under.
late sardar atta ullah mengal, sardar akhtar mengal, Sardar Sanaullah zehri, Mir Ali Haider Muhammad Hasni, Nawab Aslam Raisani
Nice ❤
Good
Congrats
The word Brahui is the name of union/confederacy of 25 tribes of Baloch which formed against Jadgaal Tribes during in 1660-1680s AD. Before Brahui Union (Baloch) dominancy in Sarawan and Jhalawan, the Brahui language Called Kurdgaal/Kurdish language . This indicates that this language was adopted by these Baloch tribes as well as other Baloch tribes who later migrated to sarawan and jhalawan. This language might formed some 7000 to 8000 years before when Neolithic Iranian farmers migrated towards modern day Balochistan ( Mehr gadh) first then to indus valley where IVC born. It was Henry potinger who for the first time in 1810 AD called Kurdgaal language as Brahui language to divide Baloch nation on the basis of Languages for the sake of Political interest of British . According to latest genetic reports Brahuis are considered to be very closest to other Balochi speakers Baloch. Similar to Other Balochs the Brahui are also share 60-70% genetic relationship with Neolithic Iranians. American linguist MC Alpin relates brahui language to Elamitic languages of Northern iran. No doubt that brahui language has few similarities with Other south Indian Dravidian languages but the genetics is totally different.
When saying the word "Brahui" might derive from "Ibrahim", you should have stated that it's just one theory. The precise origins of the name are unknown, and the explanation doesn't sound very plausible IMO.
Due to their geography, there's been a lot of mixing between Brahui and Baloch people. Pakistan has a lot of small and endangered languages across the country. There's also ethnic groups in the north, such as in Gilgit-Baltistan, from non-Indic and non-Iranic ethnolinguistic families. It would have been good if there was more cultural education about them to breed familiarity among most citizens and to preserve history.
Yes, you are right, it should have made it clearer.
So it is the use of Iranic and Iranian. Although the use of two terms is the same, it is equally true that the former has ended up assuming a national and nationalistic connotation far from the original ethnic meaning.
I wish Brahui people demand for a separate province "Brahuistan", just like in ancient time it was Kalat Princely State, which was one of most wealthy, peaceful and progressive states in Indian subcontinent, Brahuis are more peace loving, educated, progress loving, caring for their own community, less corrupt people compared to other ethnicities of Pakistan, If ever Brahuistan became a separate province, it would be alot ahead in education, infrastructure, peace and progress than being part of Balochistan. They can also then save and protect their one of the oldest language, culture, etc, and introduce their identity and culture to the whole world.
Otherwise, I fear that brahui language and culture is severely endangered, and a time might come when there would be no Brahui speaking person left on earth, I hope they realize to save their ancestoral language.
I don't know what the future of the community will be. I don't think secession is necessary. However, the Pakistani government should make efforts to protect and promote this already highly endangered language.
ty
My language is brahvi.We are baloch
NO YOU AIN'T
Welcome!
I am brahui from Balochistan kalat and brahui is our language we are Baloch
No. Brahui is our laguage and nation
Baloch ia our regional brother
so are ur ppl originally from south india?
@@jiensuyang3915 nope they aren't, brahui isn't even a completely Dravidian language, its writing style is the reason why people classify it as a Dravidian language, it has more language similarities to balochi and pashtho (iranic languages). And even when we look at the DNA, they are completely different from south indians. I'm a mix of mullahzai baloch(my great grand mother and great great grand father were Iranians who came to Pakistan) and zehri brahui and ik that the culture is 99% same, and the language has similarities too. And there isn't a lot of facial differences between them either, both my dad and moms side are light skinned with Iranian facial features.
You are welcome to Kerala later with your people.
Good to hear that we are related with Telugu peoples but alhamdulillah we all brahvis are muslim
Iam a telugu guy , recently I have seen one video on CZcams comparing brahvi and Tamil ,but most of those words matched with Telugu.
You mean Brahui shared more similarities with south central Dravidian languages than the southern ones?
Wwoow Nice Too Bro I.m Brohi
I see The Me Too Bruhui World's
جی براہوئی
we are not Dravidiann we are mixer of afghan baloch persian and kurd
that is exactly what I tried to analyze in the video. Isn't quite strange that a Dravidian language pocket came to exist in such of a distant area from the Dravidian homeland? Are the Brahuis a "forgotten tribe"?
Did Dravidian languages originate among indigenous South Asians (AASI) or indigenous Iranians?
Interesting question. One of the most plausible hypotheses is that considering the formation of the Dravidian languages to be the result of (more or less) spontaneous integrations with the different ethnic and linguistic groups that came to populate the Subcontinent. Specifically, the mix occurred between 5000 and 4000 years ago between the Iranian farmer communities coming from the North and the pre-existing aboriginal inhabitants of India, the direct descendants of the first human populations that reached South Asia following the big migration waves from Africa between 70-50,000 years ago, genetically labelled as Ancient Ancestral South Indians (the AASI you correctly mentioned).
@@TheGeekySimo what is the correct origin of Dravidian languages. I can find more similarities between Dravidian and Indo-European language family and also with Japanese & Korean.
சிறப்பு.
Brother i want to mention you one thing, Punjabi language is having 42 dialects in which top of them are Kashmiri, Sariki(formerly Multani & Riasti), Hindko, Pahari, Dogri, Pothwari, Majhi, Doabi, Malwi and Jatki. Please keep updated, your video is highly explanatory about amazing Brahvi people.
Lots of Love & Respect to you.
Thank you so much for your appreciation and for having further specified about Punjabi language!
Dogri is Jammu
And what about haryanvi??
In Bengali also there are more than 100 dialects, even in our small state Tripura there are so many Bengali dailects spoken
The Kashmiri language (koshur) is not mutually intelligible with Punjabi and therefore not a dialect
"Hui" is found in Sino-Mongolian ethnic labelling for a Muslim group of Ningsia. It may relate to Han Chinese "wei" meaning Western. If so, it could make Brahui a locator ethnonym for Brahmi language users & date it to the Moguls
.
interesting point
Sir please make history of malto peoples videos
Brahui word originated from the word Brahmi scripts, In the course of migration from Iran, These are the few core Dravidian settled at Baruch
That's possible. In the minute 04:30 I have provided an explanation for the etymology of the word Brahui.
That background song 😂😂 Love 💕 it Because I am belong to Brahui's
South Indian dravidian-speakers derive most of their ancestry from Andamanese islanders like the onge, Brahuis are the direct descendants of the real original Dravidian people, the descendants of the bmac culture
No, south indians andamanese are completely different from us. South Indians has more J2(Neolithic farmers) and then H and R1a1.
You do know Tamil language is 70% similar with Proto Dravidian language? And yet we are not the original Dravidian? Interesting....
😂😂.. south indians are very distantly related to andmanese people..and another studies say ..modern andmanese are a mix of Dravidians with real andmanese people
No, it is not.
@@Honey_Bee007 No, Andamanese are related to east Asians.
No these r Baluch from Mehrgarh civilisation. Yes their language is a mix of Baluchi & dravidian and other neighboring languages but ethnically they r Baluch.
Brahvi should be the official language in Balochistan along with Balochi? Why do you people promote Urdu, a foreign language originating in India?
Because pakistan government doesn't allow
It is not 'Aryan Invasion' theory. It is 'Aryan migration' theory. Aryan tribes had been migrating to Afghanistan and India since the Indian sub continent parted from Africa and hit the Asian continent. Since then, the only way to get to India is through Afghanistan. Since then large number of Aryans came and attacked India with Babar leading the army. Since the Mugals came to India, Central Asian Aryans had been coming to India in large numbers and it has not stopped yet.
Correct, it would be more appropriate to talk about "Aryan migration" rather than "invasion". We cannot exclude that this human migration involved invasions as it moved southwards into the Subcontinent. However, it is more correct to talk about migration. But pay attention to the dates. It is claimed that the Aryan migration to the Subcontinent occurred as soon as it rejoined Asia (approximately two million years ago). In reality, an approximate date for the appearance of the modern human being in the world (specifically in Africa), the homo sapiens, would be 300,000 years ago, well beyond the junction of the Subcontinent with Asia. Furthermore, the Aryan migration would have occurred no later than the second millennium BC.
Keep dreaming. You might have bigger bodies but to win wars you need intelligence. South India was always invading north for thousands of years that's the reason why you will see dark skinned people even in the middle East because of the invasions from south through coast route
Great Video.
But, please use the correct maps of India. 🙏
Thank you for your appreciation. Where is the Indian map depicted incorrectly exactly?
@@TheGeekySimo Kashmir dispute
according to brahuis they are 1st dravidians who migrated from moin jo daro to india also in afghanistan
Hi, thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, their origin is still uncertain. So, to a certain extent, everything would be possible. Personally, I like to think that they are the last vestige, given their isolation over the centuries, of a much more extensive Dravidian presence in South Asia before the migrations of other people from central Asia and Iran. Practically, this corresponds to what I reported in the video at minute 02:49 in relation to the first theory - Dravidian migration to India
Most of Reactistan male stars are Brahavi.
Any balochi brahui’s show your hand 😹🤚🏻
🙋🏻♂️🙋🏻♂️💔💔🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
٨/١٠/٢٠٢٣
Are brahvi baloch or not? Please clear it?
Not linguistically, although over centuries the two groups intermingled extensively. In fact, nowadays the 'pure' Brahuis are those who could live in isolated communities in a highly majoritarian Balochi region.
They were migrated to Pakistan region in medieval period from India
No, the theory of the migration from India would move the date earlier, around the 7th century AD, as I described at minute 03:50 of the video.
The maps mostly used in this video especially of India are incorrect…..
Where exactly?
@@TheGeekySimothe northern part Kashmir... I think u r unaware about that
@@mip5981wedont want to join India...
And pakistan has a small part of kashmir , gilgit baltistan isnt even kashmir
I think they are the sumerians
Brahui isn't even a completely Dravidian language, its writing style is the reason why people classify it as a Dravidian language, it has more language similarities to balochi and pashtho (iranic languages). And even when we look at the DNA, they are completely different from south indians. I'm a mix of mullahzai baloch(my great grand mother and great great grand father were Iranians who came to Pakistan) and zehri brahui and ik that the culture is 99% same, and the language has similarities too. And there isn't a lot of facial differences between them either, both my dad and moms side are light skinned with Iranian facial features.
i did more research majority of brahui speaking balochs arent even ethnically brahui e.g lehris are rinds but they speak brahui, baranzai ahmedzai mengal these are other brahui speaking baloch and if u look at them they are nothing alike dravidians
Thanks for your interesting comment! What do you mean by "writing style", the alphabeth? They do not use a distinct alphabeth, rather an adapted form of the Arabic one, as I described in the video at minute 07:50. Whatever their origin, I think it is obvious that genetic, cultural and linguistic similarities exist between the Brahuis and the populations/communities around them, given that they have shared the same geographical space for centuries. Nonetheless, the main fact is still unanswered, that is why a Dravidian language, or with numerous Dravidian linguistic, lexical and grammatical presences, has been detected in this remote part of Asia, thousands of kilometers away from the Dravidians' homeland.
Brahui is classified as Dravidian due to its grammatical structure identical with other Dravidian languages especially the more well-known Tamil. It is the only known Dravidian language spoken in present day Pakistan. At first the Brahuis were though to be descended from Dravidian migrants from southern India, but DNA testing has shown that they are genetically indistinguishable with their Balochi speaking neighbors as well are genetical distinct from the Dravidians of southern India. This may indicate that perhaps Dravidian languages were far more widespread in the past and perhaps the Baloch people were once spoke a Dravidian language before changing it for an Iranian language. The ancestors of the Brahui on the other hand retained their Dravidian language while incorporating loanwords from their Balochi neighbors.
He missed Tuluvas😂😂😂. Nevermind they exist anyways
Hi there! I mentioned Tuluvas in my previous video about Dravidians 🙂
How could I miss quoting them?🙂
Excellent scyto n aryans came from central asian chased by turcommongols n Dravidians came from thé south to thé north
No Dravidians came from elamites of Iran.
👏🏻👏🏻🤍
٣٠/٩/٢٠٢٣.
Brahvi speaking tribe include Raisani, Shahwani, Sumulani, Sarparrah, Bangulzai, Mohammad Shahi, Lehri, Bezenjo, Mohammad Hasni, Zehri , Sarparrah, Mengal, Kurd,Sasoli, Satakzai, Lango, Rodeni, Kalmati, Jattak, Yagazehi and Qambarani
Magar ye tribe baloch Hain
@@rockyhandsome9207 they speak brahui, I'm zehri and mullahzai rind mix. The zehri side of my family speaks brahui while the mullahzai rind side of my family speaks balochi. But they have zero to no difference between the races
Brahuis may as well be the FIRST dravidians of that region. They have a legend that they migrated from Central India
Thank you for your comment! Yes, I have described that possible theory about a Dravidian migration from India at minute 03:50 of the video.
Maybe they are real indus valley people
Could be. At the time, we do not have any clear evidence whether the Dravidians are last the descendants of the Indus Valley Civilization or not (for which Brahuis might be a pocked stayed isolated from the rest).
Some of them are also in Iran , weird people
Why is that?
Brahuis are descendants of Black natives of Africa,out of which Gondwana portion separated,but for several thousand years the black skins remained same,which some compares them with British invented so called Dravid clan !😅
Ever heard about this human invention called a "boat"?
I am sorry, this does not make sense.
not true
so the harappans and their civilization in the indus valley were basically Dravidian and middle eastern but the brahuis and dravidians who stayed and mixed while other south indians mixed with the remnants of the middle eastern dravidians and that why south Indians are genetically Australoid but the speak dravidian langauge due to mixing with indus valley people
Are you American ?
Dravidians are the migraters from africa thru Nubian dessert and the civilization of dravidians starts now where the brahuis are found and they keep expanding towards sindu vally, the mohenjo daro civilization is the evidently dravidians(the most ancient piese of archiolgical evidance is a tamil inscription ) and the archiolgical wotk was by abondoned by indian goverment due to this. The reason dravidians were pushed down to south the invation of aryans(the word breakup of iran mixture of euro middleeasten orgins) and after that the islam invation brahuis too as others forced to embrace islam. The funny thing is that brahuis language is given a arabic touch as in maldives. All this informations are mine after gathering informations for longer period. Thank you.
Do you know about King Cheraman Perumal who lived in 600 AD.
After that only all of them embraced Islam.
@@user-hg2fx1rv4t no if you have any solid information please share in link form thank you.
Islamophobia at its height !no forced conversions hv been there in entire indus Valley,Islam spread here due to the peaceful missionary activities of Sufi saints .
Hum sab baloch hai jhot mat blo
Translation 😂
They are not Dravidian indians
Lol some Dravidins are descendants of Brahuis...
That's debatable. So far, the origin of Brahuis is still unnown. In the video I have reported two possible theories 02:49 First theory - Dravidian migration to India, 03:50 Second theory - Dravidian migration from India.
Mengal nasalan baloch or zuban.bravhi
Mengal Naslan Mangol aur Zaban Brahui
Sir please request to u don't call the name dravidan
Ok telugus will be called as aryans 🗿
Why should he not?
But why
🤣🤣 Then what to call south indians??
Indus valley civilization only tamilnadu tamilan civilization not Dravidian civilization keeladi civilization only tamilnadu not other state Brahui people Tamil people relationship