बहुत ही अच्छे से आपने सारी जानकारी दी hai. कानूनी कार्यवाही में किसी छोटे से case में भी कितना समय और धन लगता है, इसे साफ होता है, पर निचली अदालते पहले हो क्यों नहीं, सभी लागल कोडस को फॉलो कर निर्णय कर पाती, उनके गलत या अधूरे निर्णय पर आम और खास लोग भी बहुत हैरान होते है और अपना बहुत सा कजसिन चैन, धन समय खोटे हैँ. क्या ऐसे इनकम्पलीट आर्डर करने वालो के विरुद्ध कार्यवाही, और कोर्ट के खर्च को वसूलने हेतु कोई कानूनी भी हैँ. जिनसे इन जजों को भी नासियत मिल सके. कानूनों में भी बहुत सी धाराएं बनी हैँ, हार धारा कि अलग परिभाषाये हैँ, कानूनी ऐसा होना चाहिए कि हर एक सामान्य आदमी समाज में आये,. यहाँ तो न्याय कि कुर्सी पर बैठे भी, इनका पूरा ध्या नहीं रख पर रहे रहे. वकील अपने क्लाइंट के लिए उसके फायदे वाली धाराव ओ पर जीराह करते हैँ जो संभवताये जजों को मालूम ही तभी होती हैँ.
This case pertains to 1987. Nowadays while registering the will, witnesses have to be present in the registrar office their biometric is recorded, in such case if witness becomes hostile what happens
Our laws and acts are a joke. Act of 1925 and act of 1857 Which were enforced by the British is being followed that means we are still under the British law. Why these laws were not up dated to 1947 act? It's so very unlawful to follow it as indian constitution. Its the mistake of our government to have not updated it. Secondly a will if registered and still can be invalid due to witnesses not seen the person signing the will is again breaking the law. So it's the mistake of the witnesses and not of the validity of the will when genuinely singed under the presence of registrar. God save this country and it's people from this supreme court who interprets laws according to it's will.
@@PardeepKumar-vb2bu yes I have read Hindu succession act. Yes even an unborn child ithe n the womb is a beneficiary. But here the case is different. When a couple have no children and the husband died then the sole right goes to wife and moreover it's not ancestry property that the husband side of family are eligible for the share. So the wife has all the right to give the assets to anyone she likes.
Bhut hi achhi jankari di h aapne, Dhanyawad, Jagruk hone se shi terha se log will bna skenge or vivado ka der nhi rhega. Or jis ko hum labh dena chahte h use hi milega. Ek bar fir se Dhanyawad.
Sir meri bahan bahut hi dayneey halat me hai. Kiraye k makan me rehti hai. Income ka koi sadhan nahi. Use uske sasural se kuchh nahi mila. Uska dewar vakeel hai. Usne hum sab se sign kara liya k ab meri bahan ka waha koi right nahi. Meri bahan ka na income hai na koi daud bhag karne wala. Marg darshan de sir
This judgement is very surprising. What happens if the witnesses turn hostile or are no longer living nor can them remeber and neither is the registration authority or person alive or able to recall. Indian law and jurisdiction unnecessarily introduces uncertainty in this process. This goes against the spirit of making will. This judgement should be scrutinised very carefully
What Standing do Witnesses have in the Execution of the Will. Witnesses do not have any Right to be contesting the Contents of the Final Wishes of the Executant. All they do is Certify/Verify with Knowledge that they know the Executant on a personal level & that He/They confirm that the Executant has signed the Will by the said Executant in his Presence.
आपने वसीयत करने के शर्तों के संबंध में माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय का संदर्भ देकर के वसीयत करने की कानूनी 18:40 शर्तों की जानकारी दी इसके लिए आपका बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद
To my knowledge, a will remains valid as long as the will was signed by the property owner in front of two witnesses of sound mind and the property owner is of sound mind. Registration of a will is not mandatory. I don't want to comment on the Supreme court's judgement, but it seems strange that after all this juggling, the original intention of the property owner got lost. What kind of judgement is this? Interestingly, when a court case takes 40 years, the original witnesses may have died.b
Property owners' wishes should be respected and maintained and not left to court to interpret. Witness should not have any interest in the contents of the will. They are simply the witness of the owner signing the will. In UP, witnesses are confirmed by the biometrics and photographed.
Make nomination a valid document by attaching a photo of the nominee that will make the work easier instead going through costly legal process and troubling the people and similarly in a will,too
Simply Laughable and saddening state of Judicial interpretations. Surprised to know the judgement by Courts at different levels and each Court interpreting in it's own way. The various steps that were recommended by the Learned Advocate (in the video) are both complex and cumbersome. There could be circumstances where names of relatives to be mentioned in Lists of First, Second or Third preferences etc,. may not, even, be known or available to a Testater of a *WILL* . What used be said earlier, about WILL was that, it should be in a Written Form witnessed, duly, by Two Witnesses, who can testify, at any stage, the authenticity of the said written Statement. Suggestion to have the WILL *registered* is merely to fortify the written content and as a precautionary measure, to rule out any likelyhood of the said document being disputed at any time, for it's being fake or forged or otherwise. What should be of importance, is the INTENT of Testater and CONTENT of the written Statement- *(WILL)* The Judiciary and it's judgement should be aimed to aid Common Man rather than making these labyrinthal and complicate a matter further. Very disappointing state of affairs.
Laws must be in simple language, clearly understandable to general public. They mustn't be vague and there mustn't be any scope for imagination or interpretation according to level of ignorance of the authorised interpreters.
Sir Will is the intention of the individual and registration is done to buy peace and the question in this case was involved that the property was bequeathed by the teastor to the person of her choice whereas she also inherited the property of het husband. So she was required to detail the reason of denying class II legal heirs and giving the same to her close person.
@@anjumb9206 Yeah, par banks mei nominee ka bhi provision hai, which is less cumbersome(if one doesn't have a will). Source: Quick Googling, NAL(Not a lawyer).
Sir it is a well known fact that witness need not be aware of contents of will .Witness is just testifying that document is only signed in their presence only Nothing beyond that please clarify ..
Registration is done in subregistrar office where witnesses also are present and sign in front of subregistrar.Then how can witnesses going hostile matter?
Sir, I have two queries as follows: (1) To whom does the "Letter of Probate" issued by the Court of Law? Benificiary or Executor? (2) Are Letter of Administration and Letter of Probate same?
The willfor registration is generally submitted to Registration dept. personally. The sub-registrar certifies itand generally witnesses sign in presence of him. Hence such problem should not occur. Even if the witness doesn't retify it, as the person submitting will has signed the same in presence of the sub-registrar, it should be considered valid. In fact witnesses are necessary if it is not registered. Sir, Pl clarify.
Now Will is registered in court itself with recording in front of judge so all is well . And these are old time problems the things and system are upgraded.
Very-very important subject and points have been hilighted through this media to the common people.Slow,smooth ,attentional presantation.Many many hearty Congratulations.Awaiting many more instances.
Validity of a registered will should not be diluted on frivolous grounds because the registering authority, having collected the prescribed fee and charges, is deemed to satisfy itself about essential legal requirements in the matter. Any person who comes up to challenge a registered will must be required to prove that the registration authority had failed to do its duty.
In many states now, will registration is done via biometric Aadhaar authentication of the witnesses as well as the property owner making the will in front of the registrar at the same time. Which means section 71 of the evidence act is fully satisfied. In fact, it could also be argued that the biometric record is sufficient proof of witnesses being valid under section 63 of Succession Act. Does this mean that a modern will duly registered with aadhaar biometrics will not face this problem? It will be good to confirm that such modern registered wills are indeed 'pucca'
Bhai after seeing all these chutiya judgements, especially against Hindus(succession law) , do you think still think there is anything that is pucca? The best solution for the property owner is to transfer the property to the beneficiary via gift deed. So that chutiya courts can be kept away from interfering in our property transfer.
याने मैं गवाह बनके पहले साइन कर दूं फिर । किसी के मरने के बाद कह दूं मेने तो किसी और कारण से साइन किया था। इस एक बयान से मैं किसी का 35साल का वक्त पैसा बर्बाद करवा सकती हू😅😅😅😅😅😅
I think the Hon'ble Supreme Court order is erroneous, The Registrar examines the witness before the registration, The Hon’ble SC opens door for the witness to become hostile after receiving quid pro quo from the new beneficiary. The role of the Registrar need to be underscored. The witness cannot be permitted to become hostile after a limitation period. NOT HAPPY WITH THE SC ORDER.
Witness turning hostile is a matter of concern. The appellant can buy them off to say anything in order to deny the legitimate owner by promising them a part of the property?
सर यही कहानी हमारे साथ है विपक्ष के पास भी एक झूठी वसीयत है लेकिन जब हमरा केस तहसीलदार के यहां तो विपक्ष ने वसीयत का कोई जिक्र नहीं किया और तहसीलदार के यहां से केस हार गया लेकिन कुछ समय बाद अपील सिविल में लगाकर और झूठी वसीयत तैयार कर लिया और केस जित गया अब हमने भी अपील किया है क्या हमारे साथ भी ऐसा ही होगा क्या। सलाह बताओ
It happens only in India 😂😂😂😂 Law order ka Jo majak Banta he yaha.... Attempt to murder wale bindas ghumte... Court me tarikh pe tarikh 😂.. complaint mar jaye but nyay nahi milta😢
Can't the registrar himself be treated as good witness? Nowadays even live photo, registration process is in place where the witnesses hav to identify and remain present...
श्रीमान अगर दोनों गवाह हस्ताक्षर करते समय यह लिख दें कि मैं अपने पूर्ण होशोहवास में इस प्रपत्र पर हस्ताक्षर कर रहा हूँ तथा रजिस्ट्रार महोदय भी यह प्रमाणित करदे कि दोनों गवाहों ने मेरे सामने हस्ताक्षर किए हैं तो क्या वह वसीयत मान्य रहेगी ?
I thought the witness only witnesses the signature and not the contents as that can require legal advice. A winess can not turn hostile in these situations as they can not deny that they witnessed the signature. If the law is too prorous about this, then it is a bad law that allows manipulations and abuse.
The moot point in the case is witness. Since the witness failed to validate the document, the issue had arisen. Had the document met validity in all respects, the Registration would not have been challenged.
Very informative video. Sir, Please inform whether the PDF copy of all the pages of the registered will is preserved with the registering authority so that nobody can alter the contents of the will.
Agar witness ko baad me dusra paiso ka lalach de kar kharid le tab kya. Aisi vyavastha honi chahiye ki sahi se will ka registration ho aur baad me fir koi change na kar sake, chahe witness palat jaye ya witness ki death ho jaye. Will banane ke samay jo faisla hua wahi full and final hona chahiye Supreme court itna bewkuf hai Agar will ke registration karte sayam do gawah ne registrar ke samne sign kar diya to fir kya problem hai Agar witness baad me jakar bole ki ham nahi jante to ye nahi mana jana chahiye
God bless India. Common man at mercy of unnecessarily complicated legal system.
बहुत ही अच्छे से आपने सारी जानकारी दी hai.
कानूनी कार्यवाही में किसी छोटे से case में भी कितना समय और धन लगता है, इसे साफ होता है,
पर निचली अदालते पहले हो क्यों नहीं, सभी लागल कोडस को फॉलो कर निर्णय कर पाती, उनके गलत या अधूरे निर्णय पर आम और खास लोग भी बहुत हैरान होते है और अपना बहुत सा कजसिन चैन, धन समय खोटे हैँ.
क्या ऐसे इनकम्पलीट आर्डर करने वालो के विरुद्ध कार्यवाही, और कोर्ट के खर्च को वसूलने हेतु कोई कानूनी भी हैँ. जिनसे इन जजों को भी नासियत मिल सके.
कानूनों में भी बहुत सी धाराएं बनी हैँ, हार धारा कि अलग परिभाषाये हैँ, कानूनी ऐसा होना चाहिए कि हर एक सामान्य आदमी समाज में आये,. यहाँ तो न्याय कि कुर्सी पर बैठे भी, इनका पूरा ध्या नहीं रख पर रहे रहे. वकील अपने क्लाइंट के लिए उसके फायदे वाली धाराव ओ पर जीराह करते हैँ जो संभवताये जजों को मालूम ही तभी होती हैँ.
How to make life difficult for common man and increase the number of cases by millions in courts: The master plan of Indian Supreme Court
This case pertains to 1987. Nowadays while registering the will, witnesses have to be present in the registrar office their biometric is recorded, in such case if witness becomes hostile what happens
Our laws and acts are a joke. Act of 1925 and act of 1857 Which were enforced by the British is being followed that means we are still under the British law. Why these laws were not up dated to 1947 act? It's so very unlawful to follow it as indian constitution. Its the mistake of our government to have not updated it. Secondly a will if registered and still can be invalid due to witnesses not seen the person signing the will is again breaking the law. So it's the mistake of the witnesses and not of the validity of the will when genuinely singed under the presence of registrar. God save this country and it's people from this supreme court who interprets laws according to it's will.
😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😊
half knowledge is very dangerous plz read Hindu succession Act and also read class of legal heirs after tht u will know right or wrong law
What's the use of those registrars and thumb impressions and photographs, when everything is dependable on the integrity of witnesses only
@@PardeepKumar-vb2bu yes I have read Hindu succession act. Yes even an unborn child ithe n the womb is a beneficiary. But here the case is different. When a couple have no children and the husband died then the sole right goes to wife and moreover it's not ancestry property that the husband side of family are eligible for the share. So the wife has all the right to give the assets to anyone she likes.
Whole power given to witnesses who can be manipulated any time by money nonsense low
Bhut hi achhi jankari di h aapne, Dhanyawad, Jagruk hone se shi terha se log will bna skenge or vivado ka der nhi rhega. Or jis ko hum labh dena chahte h use hi milega. Ek bar fir se Dhanyawad.
Every information given by you is so informative and morning dose from your side is commendable 😃
Sir meri bahan bahut hi dayneey halat me hai. Kiraye k makan me rehti hai. Income ka koi sadhan nahi. Use uske sasural se kuchh nahi mila. Uska dewar vakeel hai. Usne hum sab se sign kara liya k ab meri bahan ka waha koi right nahi. Meri bahan ka na income hai na koi daud bhag karne wala. Marg darshan de sir
With such a stand of the courts it appears the courts also are making mockery of their status.May God save people from such judges..
Correctly said ! I wonder about the calibre and probity quotient of the judges/ court !
So the court has 4 levels, and every level overturned the decision of the previous level!!!
This shows the incompetence of our Judiciary.
This judgement is very surprising. What happens if the witnesses turn hostile or are no longer living nor can them remeber and neither is the registration authority or person alive or able to recall. Indian law and jurisdiction unnecessarily introduces uncertainty in this process. This goes against the spirit of making will. This judgement should be scrutinised very carefully
काफी ज्ञानवर्धक है यह एपिसोड, धन्यवाद।
It is very necessary information everyone must know... I have shared this with everyone
What Standing do Witnesses have in the Execution of the Will. Witnesses do not have any Right to be contesting the Contents of the Final Wishes of the Executant. All they do is Certify/Verify with Knowledge that they know the Executant on a personal level & that He/They confirm that the Executant has signed the Will by the said Executant in his Presence.
Very valuable information. थँक्स.
Very very useful knowledge Sir Ji many many thanks
Supreme court interpretion about the law is very often inconsistent.
Our judges are great.
They are inconsistent fools
Very important judgment. Thanks a lot for sharing.
आपने वसीयत करने के शर्तों के संबंध में माननीय उच्चतम न्यायालय का संदर्भ देकर के वसीयत करने की कानूनी 18:40 शर्तों की जानकारी दी इसके लिए आपका बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद
What if witnesses are no more ( dead) ?
This video creates real concern as we know very well that how witnesses could be influenced according to one's interest..😢😮
WHAT HAPPENS IF BOTH THE WITNESSES DIES & REGISTRAR ALSO RETIRES & DISAPPEARS…(could not find as left the city or doesn’t remember due to age issue)?
To my knowledge, a will remains valid as long as the will was signed by the property owner in front of two witnesses of sound mind and the property owner is of sound mind. Registration of a will is not mandatory.
I don't want to comment on the Supreme court's judgement, but it seems strange that after all this juggling, the original intention of the property owner got lost. What kind of judgement is this?
Interestingly, when a court case takes 40 years, the original witnesses may have died.b
Very true and valid
Property owners' wishes should be respected and maintained and not left to court to interpret. Witness should not have any interest in the contents of the will. They are simply the witness of the owner signing the will. In UP, witnesses are confirmed by the biometrics and photographed.
आपने बहुत सुंदर ढंग से समझाया।
Absolutely excellent video to watch and be aware of pitfalls when making "Wills"! Great job Sir!
अगर वसीयत के कागजों में कोई भी कमी है तो तो रजिस्ट्रार की जिम्मेदारी होनी चाहिए कि वह उस कमी को बताए
Yes exactly
It's a old Case, Now all signature happened digitally in registrar office
biomaterials finger print or photo scan ko bhi jhootha saabit kaise kar diya gya😮😮😮
Thank u so much sir 🙏 kafi kuchh jasnkar I mili ,hamare kisi karibinka bhi case chal raha hai usame ye kaam aayegi mahiti
Agar gawah Dara dhamka kar disturb kar diya jaye to yahi isthiti hogi???
Katayi jarori suchna hai yeh dhnyawad 🙏
Excellent way to clarify the law of succession and formation of right will.
The Indian judiciary takes so many years to come to a wrong decision 😢.
The worst part of our democracy
सर, मेरा एक सवाल है कि अगर किसी कारण से दोनों गवाहों की भी मौत(आकस्मिक या नेचुरल) हो जाती है तो उस सूरत में क्या होगा ?
Bapre
Humne to will regiser kervane ke 11,000 diye.
Uperse kitni zerox, photo, court me dhakea khaye, sab 👎
Thanks Brijesh ji for sharing valuable information.
Make nomination a valid document by attaching a photo of the nominee that will make the work easier instead going through costly legal process and troubling the people and similarly in a will,too
Simply Laughable and saddening state of Judicial interpretations. Surprised to know the judgement by Courts at different levels and each Court interpreting in it's own way.
The various steps that were recommended by the Learned Advocate (in the video)
are both complex and cumbersome.
There could be circumstances where names of relatives to be mentioned in Lists of First, Second or Third preferences etc,. may not, even, be known or available to a Testater of a *WILL* . What used be said earlier, about WILL was that, it should be in a Written Form witnessed, duly, by Two Witnesses, who can testify, at any stage, the authenticity of the said written Statement. Suggestion to have the WILL *registered* is merely to fortify the written content and as a precautionary measure, to rule out any likelyhood of the said document being disputed at any time, for it's being fake or forged or otherwise. What should be of importance, is the INTENT of Testater and CONTENT of the written Statement- *(WILL)*
The Judiciary and it's judgement should be aimed to aid Common Man rather than making these labyrinthal and complicate a matter further. Very disappointing state of affairs.
Laws must be in simple language, clearly understandable to general public.
They mustn't be vague and there mustn't be any scope for imagination or interpretation according to level of ignorance of the authorised interpreters.
Sir you are my saviour 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Sir Will is the intention of the individual and registration is done to buy peace and the question in this case was involved that the property was bequeathed by the teastor to the person of her choice whereas she also inherited the property of het husband.
So she was required to detail the reason of denying class II legal heirs and giving the same to her close person.
Very nice and clear information,my all doubts are clear, thanks sir
Bech daalo immovable property, merte time. No will, no problem
Bech dalenge phir us paise ke liye bhi toe will ki zaroorat parne waali hai
@@anjumb9206 Yeah, par banks mei nominee ka bhi provision hai, which is less cumbersome(if one doesn't have a will).
Source: Quick Googling, NAL(Not a lawyer).
Sir it is a well known fact that witness need not be aware of contents of will .Witness is just testifying that document is only signed in their presence only Nothing beyond that please clarify ..
Very detailed and easy to understand information
Awareness ke ley aapka aabhar
Excellent explanation of the topic. Thanks a lot Wakeel saheb.
गवाह मुकर कैसे सकते हैं जबकि रजिस्ट्रार के सामने विल करने वाला और दोनों गाव बैठकर ही हस्ताक्षर करते हैं और साथ साथ वीडियो रिकॉर्डिंग भी होती है
😅 15:19
Thanks a lot to enlightening the senior citizens esp..
What if witnesses are bribed to turn hostile by the party challenging the will
बहुत ही बेहतरीन जानकारी।
अगर गवाहो की मृत्यु हो गयी हो तब क्या होगा?
Very crucial topic covered Thanks Sir
Registration is done in subregistrar office where witnesses also are present and sign in front of subregistrar.Then how can witnesses going hostile matter?
सर, बहुत अच्छी जानकारी दी। धन्यवाद।
Sir, I have two queries as follows:
(1) To whom does the "Letter of Probate" issued by the Court of Law? Benificiary or Executor?
(2) Are Letter of Administration and Letter of Probate same?
संक्षेप मे सारगर्भित जानकारी के लिए धन्यवाद। कृपया ऐसी ही जन उपयोगी प्रमुख बातों पर आपके वीडियो का इन्तजार रहेगा।
Radhe radhe,avashyak jankari
The willfor registration is generally submitted to Registration dept. personally. The sub-registrar certifies itand generally witnesses sign in presence of him. Hence such problem should not occur. Even if the witness doesn't retify it, as the person submitting will has signed the same in presence of the sub-registrar, it should be considered valid. In fact witnesses are necessary if it is not registered. Sir, Pl clarify.
Now Will is registered in court itself with recording in front of judge so all is well . And these are old time problems the things and system are upgraded.
Very-very important subject and points have been hilighted through this media to the common people.Slow,smooth ,attentional presantation.Many many hearty Congratulations.Awaiting many more instances.
In case both witness died?
Very nice information to us .
Intention of will maker should be taken in to account and not witness issue.There is no guarantee witness person s need not alive after so many years
You are right but then ex muder says that will was 6:12 made under influence or pressure of the beneficiary. Indian judiciary system is waste of time
Excellent detailed information regarding will. 👌 hats off to you 👏
रजिस्ट्रार जिसने विल रजिस्टर की उसको बताना चाहिए था कमी के बारे में। Penalty should be imposed on registrar ek आम आदमी इतने पेच कहां समझता है
आपकी जानकारी को हमारा शुक्रिया जी 🙏🇮🇳
3:18 - in matter of "Dhani Ram Legal Representatives & Others vs Shiv Singh (SC). Civil Appeal no 8172 of 2009 . Date of order : 6.10.2023
Is there any official sample of a will showing the list of mandatory ìnformation essential?
Bhout hi upyogi jankari di so Thanks sir🎉
A witness can be bribed to become hostile. In such a case how can it be proved.
Namaste sir 🙏 bhout bhout dhnyawad aapka mene will register karali hai lakin iska aur dhyan dena padega😮
Validity of a registered will should not be diluted on frivolous grounds because the registering authority, having collected the prescribed fee and charges, is deemed to satisfy itself about essential legal requirements in the matter. Any person who comes up to challenge a registered will must be required to prove that the registration authority had failed to do its duty.
Dhanyavadagalu. Very analysis.
In many states now, will registration is done via biometric Aadhaar authentication of the witnesses as well as the property owner making the will in front of the registrar at the same time. Which means section 71 of the evidence act is fully satisfied.
In fact, it could also be argued that the biometric record is sufficient proof of witnesses being valid under section 63 of Succession Act.
Does this mean that a modern will duly registered with aadhaar biometrics will not face this problem? It will be good to confirm that such modern registered wills are indeed 'pucca'
Bhai after seeing all these chutiya judgements, especially against Hindus(succession law) , do you think still think there is anything that is pucca? The best solution for the property owner is to transfer the property to the beneficiary via gift deed. So that chutiya courts can be kept away from interfering in our property transfer.
@@kiranbabu5938pata nahi usme b kucchh Kand kar sakte he😢
Sir I have only one daughter is it necessary to write a will.She is the only legal heir to the property.My wife passed away two years back.
याने मैं गवाह बनके पहले साइन कर दूं फिर ।
किसी के मरने के बाद कह दूं मेने तो किसी और कारण से साइन किया था।
इस एक बयान से मैं किसी का 35साल का वक्त पैसा बर्बाद करवा सकती हू😅😅😅😅😅😅
If the property is self acquired of first deceased then how it will go to nefew of Sohanlal. He can give his property to anyone.
I think the Hon'ble Supreme Court order is erroneous, The Registrar examines the witness before the registration, The Hon’ble SC opens door for the witness to become hostile after receiving quid pro quo from the new beneficiary. The role of the Registrar need to be underscored. The witness cannot be permitted to become hostile after a limitation period. NOT HAPPY WITH THE SC ORDER.
All judges must hv knowledge of all acts or they must readbit before giving court order
If both the witnesses dye then . What will be the status of will
Sir ji namaskar 🙏bhout khub jankari
Witness turning hostile is a matter of concern.
The appellant can buy them off to say anything in order to deny the legitimate owner by promising them a part of the property?
Sir Witness ka agar death ho Jata hai to supreme court Kya adesh deta, please give your opinion. Thanks.
सर यही कहानी हमारे साथ है विपक्ष के पास भी एक झूठी वसीयत है लेकिन जब हमरा केस तहसीलदार के यहां तो विपक्ष ने वसीयत का कोई जिक्र नहीं किया और तहसीलदार के यहां से केस हार गया लेकिन कुछ समय बाद अपील सिविल में लगाकर और झूठी वसीयत तैयार कर लिया और केस जित गया अब हमने भी अपील किया है क्या हमारे साथ भी ऐसा ही होगा क्या। सलाह बताओ
Bahut hi achi jankari pradan ki Thanks
Very useful video. Thank you for sharing this
I request lawyers community to help sr. Citizen free of cost or with very less fees on a humanity ground..
Congratulations on new scenario
Then what is the right legal procedure of transferring property ?
हर judge अपने अपने मूड के हिसाब से फैसला दे रहा है 😂
Excellent
It happens only in India 😂😂😂😂
Law order ka Jo majak Banta he yaha.... Attempt to murder wale bindas ghumte... Court me tarikh pe tarikh 😂.. complaint mar jaye but nyay nahi milta😢
Sahi hai. It will be easy by a claimant to buy out witnesses and challenge the will.
Mood मतलब ₹ है क्या ?
एसे ही होता हैं..
If witnesses expired,then what the status of registered will
Can't the registrar himself be treated as good witness?
Nowadays even live photo, registration process is in place where the witnesses hav to identify and remain present...
श्रीमान अगर दोनों गवाह हस्ताक्षर करते समय यह लिख दें कि मैं अपने पूर्ण होशोहवास में इस प्रपत्र पर हस्ताक्षर कर रहा हूँ तथा रजिस्ट्रार महोदय भी यह प्रमाणित करदे कि दोनों गवाहों ने मेरे सामने हस्ताक्षर किए हैं तो क्या वह वसीयत मान्य रहेगी ?
Yes sir
वसीयत के bare me kuch puchna hai to call kar lo 8650000408
Thanks. So. Much. Achi. Jankari. Mili.
The laws must be very simple and not complicated like in this case. Indian laws are horrible.
Then what is the purpose of registering the will.
I thought the witness only witnesses the signature and not the contents as that can require legal advice. A winess can not turn hostile in these situations as they can not deny that they witnessed the signature. If the law is too prorous about this, then it is a bad law that allows manipulations and abuse.
English version may be made for better understanding.
Sir, the registered will is of no use it means, judgement should be reconsidered...
The moot point in the case is witness. Since the witness failed to validate the document, the issue had arisen. Had the document met validity in all respects, the Registration would not have been challenged.
Very informative video. Sir, Please inform whether the PDF copy of all the pages of the registered will is preserved with the registering authority so that nobody can alter the contents of the will.
Agar witness ko baad me dusra paiso ka lalach de kar kharid le tab kya.
Aisi vyavastha honi chahiye ki sahi se will ka registration ho aur baad me fir koi change na kar sake, chahe witness palat jaye ya witness ki death ho jaye. Will banane ke samay jo faisla hua wahi full and final hona chahiye
Supreme court itna bewkuf hai
Agar will ke registration karte sayam do gawah ne registrar ke samne sign kar diya to fir kya problem hai
Agar witness baad me jakar bole ki ham nahi jante to ye nahi mana jana chahiye
Witness and other things documents are proper or not it should be ascertained by the Registrar.Registrar should be responsible for that
Mutation nehi karne se kya problem hoga.?