Video

thank you, related rates has been my nightmare lately

Thank you SIr now my concept is cleared

Am i tripping or should it be 4 divided by cosine of the angle.

Thank you for a nice, simple explanation.

excellent

Which book are you using?

You are single-handedly saving so many hours of searching for help. Thanks

thanks

Goated.

This man is clearly a god. Thank you sir!!!

Thank you for going back over the internal angle rule! It is very annoying to see videos that glide right over geometry and trig when those are the parts people struggle with the MOST.

Please can you make a video of 3 loops with multiple voltage switches

Trickiest thing about this question IMO is that it's poorly worded and somewhat unrealistic esp. for a science textbook. Initial wording makes it seems like 57.7 and 80.5 apply to "phase 1" and the remaining measures to "phase 2." They should really say, during two completely separate stopping incidents, your total distance covered (during both reaction and stopping phases) is this and initial velocity was that. Assume you have exactly the same reaction time and deceleration during these two completely unrelated events.

can u show the derivation for the equation solid sphere of uniform charge

🐐

How can the bob complete the circle if its velocity at the top is zero. If the velocity is zero at the top then it will fall down vertically downwards. The correct answer should be that the tension in the string at the top will be zero. This will give a finite velocity (instead of zero) for the bob at the top. The speed at the top should be (gL) ^0.5

omg thank you so much

Joss ❤

Thank u Man

I owe it to you man. My professor sucked at explaining this

i think the y acceleration or gravity should be positive since the mass is going downwards??? if it was negative, then the car would go backwards since negative velocity makes the object go the opposite way

Thank you so much for the videos!! It really saved me!

Explained beautifully. Thank you so much

Thanks you the goat

Thanks

Dude, I appreciate the help, but this was just flat out wrong for the exact same question on physics homework.

You are the best

Thanks for the videooo, it was a great help

You're so excellent at breaking down these problems! Thank you so much!

your handwriting is impeccable

Amazing❤❤❤❤

if the electric field wasn't constant for the J and K direction, would the Qnet have just been the addition of every side?

Now I can feel at peace . This ploblem was hard for me 😊

This was still confusing af

Thanks for this solution

This is more scientific solution than common solution in the internet for halliday. Good job . Thanks

@WNY tutor please come back sir

U save my life. I couldn't sleep all night thinking about this exercise, and now all have sence. Love u bro ❤❤❤

Thanks clearly explained

Nyc work

Wow thanks

Thank you so much your videos always help me

Thank you!

The problem stated in the description does not match the video. Did you upload the wrong file while making your video series and made two of these videos instead? Regardless, thank you for the clear explanation. I was able to use the things you taught me in the video to solve the original equation with those tools.

great explanation!

Thanks so much for making these videos available.

8:51 I just simply didn't get it! Why isn't your force normal in the direction of the object, in lieu it is perpendicular to the surface?

Thanks!

Thank you!!

ma man