Video

Great thank you, this had all the basic info I needed

Is it possible to mod Craftsman battery to power Porter Cable & BD tools? Craftsman ones have 4 connector pins and are cheaper, too.

Are you holding the slip fitting upside down? Seems like the larger OD section should be oriented above the smaller section to keep water out.

To many cheifs, 👮not enough Indians? 😳

I don't think it's funny the girl is probably terrified and so are the people in the water yet someone's laughing shame on him

Huh?

huh

Acting like kids

Blue Line Swine 😂😂😂😂

Never use front brake unless necessary

This is who's patroling.

Makes me feel all toasty inside 🥰

fist full of brake, face full of dirt.

When the metric and standard sets of wrenches in the tool box meet.

Some clown always wearing a cowboy hat.

Tools Fighting Tools who have no Idea what there doing 😂😂

Your headline isn't true

FYI, any arrest made at a post office has never been for photography. They always use "Trespassing" as their catch all. Cause photography for News purposes is legal.

*_Poster 7 explained_* - _see the problem people have in comprehending the text of the _*_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property",_*_ IE: USPS Poster 7 is... the subject areas and conditions._ *Note: the section in the **_"Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property"_** (Poster 7) concerning **_"Photography for News",_** it covers three "Subject Areas" **_(SA#)_** and two "Conditions" **_(C#);_* _(SA1) - Photographs for News,_ _(C1) - entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings_ _(C2) - Other photographs_ _(SA2) - Advertising,_ _(SA3) - or Commercial Purposes._ _Let's review the subject areas, and their conditions._ _USPS Poster 7 (Aug 2016) text:_ *_(SA1)_** Photographs for News, **_(SA2)_** Advertising, or **_(SA3)_** Commercial Purposes* *_(SA1)_* Photographs for news purposes may be taken in *_(C1)_* entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings except where prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule. *_(C2 & SA2, SA3)_* Other photographs may be taken only with the permission of the local Postmaster or installation head. _The last sentence deals _*_"Only"_*_ with_ *_"(C2) Other photographs"_* IE: *_"(SA2) Advertising, or (SA3) Commercial Purposes"_*_ as (SA1) and its condition (C1) was already covered._ _Where readers misinterpret the last part of the first sentence covering (SA1) & (C1) is when they encounter the word_ *_"except."_* (We will refer to that as the *_"exception.")_* The *_"exception",_* which is *_"Except Where Prohibited",_* indicates that it has to be _"already prohibited"_ or is _"being prohibited";_ again, *_where prohibited._* ▫️ _NOTE that:_ *(SA1)* "Photographs for news purposes may be taken in" _Clearly establishes _*_"that photographs may be taken."_* ▫️ _And note that:_ *_(C1)_* "entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums when used for public meetings" _Clearly establishes where "photographs may be taken in."_ ● An *_"Authorized Personnel"_* or *_"Employees Only"_* sign or placard meets the *_"Except Where Prohibited"_* guidance. IE: [except where _{in any of those places it is}_ prohibited by official signs or Security Force personnel or other authorized personnel or a federal court order or rule.] Again, the key words are: *_"Except Where Prohibited"..._* ● by offical signs ▫️IE: an _"Authorized Personnel"_ or _"Employees Only"_ sign or placard. ○ Currently there is no Legal Signage prohibiting news photography in public areas. ● or Security Force personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or other authorized personnel ○ Can only restrict photography or stop someone from doing it in an "authorized/restricted" area per the USPS "Rules and Regulations Governing Conduct on Postal Service Property". ● or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it. ○ Currently the Federal Courts and the CFR allows news photography in public areas. The CFR, the DHS Order of 2018, the USPS POM, and the USPS Poster 7 all allow news photography in public areas. Cause: the *_"right"_* to take pictures or video in public areas has already been clearly established by the courts and the government/courts can not confirm a *_"right"_* then place restrictions that take that *_"right"_* away in its entirety. Even 41 CFR § 102-74.420 (linked below) clearly verifies photography is allowed for news purposes in the public areas. And the CFR is the Controlling federal regulation for Poster 7. ■ 41 CFR § 102-74.420 [2008]: *_What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes?_* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2008-title41-vol3/xml/CFR-2008-title41-vol3-sec102-74-420.xml ■ 39 CFR § 232.1(i) [2003]: *_Conduct on postal property._* www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2003-title39-vol1/xml/CFR-2003-title39-vol1-sec232-1.xml ■ USPS Poster 7 [2016]: *_Rules and Regulations Governing Conducton Postal Service Property_* about.usps.com/posters/pos7.pdf ■ DHS Operational Readiness Order of 2018 on Photography: www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Operational%20Readiness%20Order%20HQ-ORO-002-2018%20Photography%20and%20Videotaping%20....pdf □ DHS Order of 2018 covering photography *_(un edited)_* mega.nz/#!VxUmWKyA!QEJL99SkqXrlEAk9S3ZrN3tAk3PxNwiycBEGiZLQdzA ■ USPS Inspector acknowledgement: czcams.com/video/tTpT7T77DTU/video.htmlm10s czcams.com/video/tTpT7T77DTU/video.htmlm00s czcams.com/video/tZIZblghujg/video.htmlm00s czcams.com/video/3Fio7cIeRsg/video.htmlm ■ USPS Station Manager acknowledgement: czcams.com/video/U-PkfKgZlYA/video.htmlm20s ■ Settled Court Case (Aug 2020): Silverthorne pays $9,500 settlement to ‘First Amendment auditor’ following incident at post office. www.summitdaily.com/news/silverthorne-pays-9500-settlement-to-first-amendment-auditor-following-incident-at-post-office/ *_Hope it helps..._*

The LAW is written for driver safety, as well as for the safety of other people and property they may injure/destroy when unable to see due to the dark tint. Very much like the requirement for vehicles to have headlights. Coincidently, dark tint also obstructs an Officer's ability to detect or observe possible threats when approaching and conducting a traffic stop.

The cops bringing an arrestee into the facility have ZERO authority in that jail, the staff runs that facility. The Captain trying to enter the second room without authorization by slipping past the Deputy is 100% wrong. He was not authorized to go to that area and was told not to enter but he did so anyway. At that point, he was in violation. The county Sheriff is the ultimate authority in the jurisdiction and he runs the jail.

Jackasses can't even agree who is a prisoner and who is not! Law Enforcement please STOP blaming soft District Attorney's for kicking people loose. This is a disgrace that We the People are tired of.

They don’t even like each other, lmao. Bunch of emo infantile terrorists that have to have their way all the time.

When power tripping bullies meet other power tripping bullies.

Dear Mr. Motofy, why don't you watch all of Frank's video's and then write about what an outstanding officer he is instead of taking a clip and trying to make something of it.

"best buy security fights cop in jail"

It's like watching a bunch of kids fighting in a schoolyard.

This cop is a tool, you can tell he gets gets pleasure from the authority

appears they are not accepting a prisoner from the officer

15% tint out of 30% tint max is less than 50% from max tint and Mr. trained professional observer can't tell by 50% darkness that the window is in compliance? He is just looking to hassle people with a little bit of window tint. I would call him out for that.someone is bucking for a promotion it seems.

context??

One single officer admitted it. Not the police. Besides, anyone who thinks it's about safety is part of the sheep. They're here for revenue. Make the city/town/county/state money.

Simple to avoid, don't have illegal tint

tyrant fights tyrant

Looks like more than one agency, and a history of disagreement. Is that a Reservation Cop? "Creek Nation Lighthorsemen."

What the hell did I just watch? How about some details in the description.

What hick town did this take place in??

Not true, I watch all of Frank's videos he is all about safety and education. The tint is for officer safety and as well as driver safety the seat belt should be obvious.

Can’t we all just get along?

Damn no one in the world can get along

AT LEAST THEY DON'T DISCRIMINATE AGANIST NO ONE, THEY WILL F##K UP ANY ONE.

LoL

if they cant control themselves how can they be trusted to safeguard an inmate under the responsibility of governmental authority and all the liability that comes with it to include an inmates civil rights etc

This is THE SWEETEST video on the internet right now. 🥹🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽❤️🙏🏽 Thank you for reposting Maggie’s beautiful smile 🥰

O.K.Its completely obvious the only reason frauditors do this , is so they can make money off You Tube , because they are too lazy and stupid to get a real job. Do you guys see how popular you are ? Nobody wants you morons standing in the Post Office with your faces covered like a bunch of cowards filming them. This has NOTHING to do with any rights. So what if you think its legal. NOBODY likes you doing it. Except for your brain-dead followers who seem to think its funny. Get a life and a REAL job , instead of making money by annoying people and being an ass-hole.

100% allowed within the confide of poster 7.

If you ever think you’ve a sad miserable life, watch auditurds. You’ll be immediately thankful your life isn’t that bad.

4:05 looks exactly like the p.o. I was auditing on Friday. Video is up.

Wow. Even the Postal Popo can't help but give the same obvious directives that the standard Popo give. HILARIOUS!

Local police do NOT have any jurisdiction in any Federal public building.